QCD Plasma Equilibration, Collective Flow Effects and Jet-Quenching – Phenomena of Common Origin
description
Transcript of QCD Plasma Equilibration, Collective Flow Effects and Jet-Quenching – Phenomena of Common Origin
QCD Plasma Equilibration, Collective Flow Effects and Jet-Quenching –Phenomena of Common Origin
C. Greiner,
24th winter workshop on nuclear dynamics, South Padre Island, 2008
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Institut für Theoretische Physik
in collaboration with
A. El, O. Fochler, B. Schenke, H. Stöcker, Zhe Xu
Y
X
Fast Thermalization from QCD:
3-2 important!
Equilibr. time short in 2-3!
Elliptic flow v2 high in 2-3!
Viscosity small ~ 0.08!
RAA,gluon ~ 0.1 !
Three body effects in parton cascades!
P.Huovinen et al., PLB 503, 58 (2001)
from R. Bellwied
Initial production of partons
dt
dpxfxpxfxK
dydydp
d cdab
tbtadcbat
jet
),(),( 2
222
11,;,21
2
minijets
string matter
color glass condensate
Momentum space anisotropy:Time dependence
Michael Strickland
Thermalization driven by plasma instabilitiesRefs.:
Mrowczynski;
Arnold, Lenaghan, Moore, Yaffe;
Rebhan, Romatschke, Strickland,
Bödeker, Rummukainen;
Dumitru, Nara;
Berges, Scheffler, Sexty
Dumitru, Nara, Strickland, PRD 75, 025016 (2007)
Dumitru, Nara, Schenke, Strickland, arXiv:0710.1223
QCD thermalization usingparton cascade
VNI/BMS: K.Geiger and B.Müller, NPB 369, 600 (1992)
S.A.Bass, B.Müller and D.K.Srivastava, PLB 551, 277(2003)
ZPC: B. Zhang, Comput. Phys.Commun. 109, 193 (1998)
MPC: D.Molnar and M.Gyulassy, PRC 62, 054907 (2000)
AMPT: B. Zhang, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li, and Z.W. Lin, PRC 61, 067901 (2000)
BAMPS: Z. Xu and C. Greiner, PRC 71, 064901 (2005); 76, 024911 (2007)
),(),(),( pxCpxCpxfp ggggggggg
BAMPS: Boltzmann Approach of MultiParton Scatterings
A transport algorithm solving the Boltzmann-Equations for on-shell partons with pQCD interactions
new development ggg gg,radiative „corrections“
(Z)MPC, VNI/BMS, AMPT
Elastic scatterings are ineffective in thermalization !
Inelastic interactions are needed !
Xiong, Shuryak, PRC 49, 2203 (1994)Dumitru, Gyulassy, PLB 494, 215 (2000)Serreau, Schiff, JHEP 0111, 039 (2001)Baier, Mueller, Schiff, Son, PLB 502, 51 (2001)
)cosh()(
12
)(2
9
,)(2
9
222
22
222
242
222
242
ykmqkk
qg
mq
sgM
mq
sgM
gLPM
DDggggg
Dgggg
J.F.Gunion, G.F.Bertsch, PRD 25, 746(1982)T.S.Biro at el., PRC 48, 1275 (1993)S.M.Wong, NPA 607, 442 (1996)
screened partonic interactions in leading order pQCD
),3(16),( 1)2(
223
3
qfgppd
sDD fnftxmm
screening mass:
LPM suppression: the formation time g1 cosh
ykg: mean free path
radiative part
elastic part
gg gg: small-angle scatterings
gg ggg: large-angle bremsstrahlung
distribution of collision angles
at RHIC energies
3-2 + 2-3: thermalization! Hydrodynamic behavior! 2-2: NO thermalization
simulation pQCD 2-2 + 2-3 + 3-2simulation pQCD, only 2-2
at collision center: xT<1.5 fm, z < 0.4 t fm of a central Au+Au at s1/2=200 GeVInitial conditions: minijets pT>1.4 GeV; coupling s=0.3
pT spectra
A.El, Z. Xu and CG, arXiv: 0712.3734 [hep-ph]
ggg gg !This 3-2 is missing in the Bottom-Up scenario(Baier, Dohkshitzer, Mueller, Son (2001)).
Initial conditions: Color Glass Condensate Qs=3 GeV; coupling s=0.3
pT spectra
Bottom up is not working as advocated: no tremendous soft gluon production,soft modes do not thermalize before the hard modes
time scale of thermalization
0
2
2
02
2
2
2
2
2
exp)()(tt
E
pt
E
p
E
pt
E
peq
ZZeq
ZZ
= time scale of kinetic equilibration.
fm/c 1Theoretical Result !
mb 0.57
mb 0.82
MeV 400T,3.0 for s
ggggg
gggg
Cross section does not determine !
relvnR
11~
Z. Xu and CG, arXiv: 0710.5719 [nucl-th]
ggggggggg
What determinesthe equilibration time scale ?
2tr sin section cross transport
d
dd
trgggg
trggggg BUT, this is not the full story !
Transport Rates
trggggg
trggggg
trgggg
trdrift RRRR
1
Z. Xu and CG, PRC 76, 024911 (2007)
ggggggggggggggi
vn
Cpd
vCvpd
R
z
iziztri
,,
,)
31
(
)2()2( with
2
3
322
3
3
• Transport rate is the correct quantity describing kinetic equilibration.
• Transport collision rates have an indirect relationship to the collision-angle distribution.
trggggg
trggggg
trgggg
trggggg
RR
R
R
3
2
53
Transport Rates
2222 )(ln~: sstrRgggg
01.0for)(ln~: 2223 ssstrRggggg
01.0for)(ln~ 2323 ssstrR
Large Effect of 2-3 !
Shear Viscosity Z. Xu and CG, arXiv: 0710.5719 [nucl-th]
)3(2
2
uu
TTT
zz
zzyyxx
From Navier-Stokes approximation
Cfv From Boltzmann-Eq.
Cpd
vuun
Cvpd
fvvpd
zzz
zz
3
32
23
32
3
3
)2()41()3(
15
2
)2()2(
322323
31
31
1)(
5
1
2
2
2
2
RRR
En
tr
E
p
E
p
z
z
relation between and Rtr
)(7
1)( gggg
sggggg
s
Ratio of shear viscosity to entropy density in 2-3
AdS/CFTRHIC
Z. Xu, A. El
transverse flow velocity of local cell in thetransverse plane of central rapidity bin
Au+Au b=8.6 fmusing BAMPS =c
22yx vv
Collective Effects
Elliptic Flow and Shear Viscosity in 2-3 at RHIC 2-3 Parton cascade BAMPS Z. Xu, CG, H. Stöcker, arXiv: 0711.0961 [nucl-th]
viscous hydro.Romatschke, PRL 99, 172301,2007
322323
31
31
1)(
5
1
2
2
2
2
RRR
En
tr
E
p
E
p
z
z
/s at RHIC > 0.08
Z. Xu
Rapidity Dependence of v2: Importance of 2-3! BAMPS
evolution of transverse energy
Dissipative HydrodynamicsShear, bulk viscosity and heat conductivity of dense QCD matter could be prime
candidates for the next Particle Data Group, if they can be extracted from data.
Need a causal hydrodynamical theory.What are the criteria of applicability?
Causal stable hydrodynamics can be derrived from the Boltzmann Equation:
-Renormalization Group Method by Kunihiro/Tsumura-->stable 1st Order linearized BE with f=f
0+εf
1+ε²f
2 yields (2nd Order – work in progress)
can be solved by introducing projector P on Ker{A}, where A-linearized collision operator
-Grad‘s 14-momentum method-->2nd Order causal hydrodynamics.
Calculate momenta of the BE. Transport coefficients and relaxation times for dissipative quantities can be calculated as functions of collision terms in BE.
Compare dissipative relaxation times to the mean free pass from cascade simulation.
Andrej E
l
nuclear modification factor
relative to pp (binary collision scaling)
experiments show approx. factor 5 of suppression in hadron yields
Hard probes of the medium
high energy particles are promising probes of the medium created in AA-collisions
QM 2008, T. Awes
LPM-effect transport model: incoherent treatment of ggggg processes parent gluon must not scatter during formation time of emitted gluon
discard all possible interference effects (Bethe-Heitler regime)
kt
CM frame
p1 p2
lab frame
kt
= 1 / kt
total boost
O. Fochler
first realistic 3d results on jet-quenching with BAMPS
LPM cut-off increases
dE/dx, static medium (T = 400 MeV)<qT
2/, static medium (T = 400 MeV)
RAA ~ 0.1
cf. S. Wicks et al.Nucl.Phys.A784, 426
nuclear modification factorcentral (b=0 fm) Au-Au at 200 AGeV
O. Fochler
Jet propagation within YM fields
Poynting vectors
Dynamical simulation of jet propagation in the plasma
Björn Schenke
preliminary
Stronger longitudinal broadeningcaused by domains of strong chromo-fields with
Explaining the “ridge”
Additional near-side long range correlation in
(“ridge like” corrl.) observed.
Dan Magestro, Hard Probes 2004, STAR, nucl-ex/0509030, Phys. Rev. C73 (2006) 064907 and P. Jacobs, nucl-ex/0503022
Au+Au 0-10%
STAR
preliminary
J. Pu
tschke, QM
2006
Dumitru, Nara, Schenke, Stricklande-Print: arXiv:0710.1223 [hep-ph]
Inelastic/radiative pQCD interactions (23 + 32) explain:
fast Thermalization
large Collective Flow
small shear Viscosity of QCD matter at RHIC
realistic jet-quenching of gluons
Summary
Future/ongoing analysis and developments:
light and heavy quarks
jet-quenching (Mach Cones, ridge)
hadronisation and afterburning (UrQMD) needed to determine
how imperfect the QGP at RHIC and LHC can be
dissipative hydrodynamics
Au+Au – Setup central (b=0 fm) Au-Au collision at 200 AGeV sampling of initial gluon plasma:
initial momentum distribution (mini-jets) according to
Glück-Reya-Vogt parameterization for structure functions; K = 2 lower cut-off: p0 = 1.4 GeV (reproduces dET/dy)
particle production via standard nuclear geometry(Wood-Saxon density profile, Glauber-Model)
each parton is given a formation time 35 testparticles simulate evolution of fireball up to ~5 fm/c when energy density in a cell drops below = 1 GeV
free streaming (in the respective cell)
Initial conditions
dcba
cdab
TbTa
T
jet
td
dpxfxpxfxK
dydydp
d
,;,
2
22
2
11
21
2 ˆ),(),(
ppjetAA
AAjet bTN )0(2
Glauber-type: Woods-Saxon profile, binary nucleon-nucleon collision
700/ dydN gfor a central Au+Au collision at RHICat 200 AGeV using p0=1.4 GeV
minijets production with pt > p0
Stochastic algorithm P.Danielewicz, G.F.Bertsch, Nucl. Phys. A 533, 712(1991)A.Lang et al., J. Comp. Phys. 106, 391(1993)
for particles in 3x with momentum p1,p2,p3 ...
collision probability:
23321
3232
32323
32222
)(823
32
22
x
t
EEE
IPfor
x
tvPfor
x
tvPfor
rel
rel
)()2(2)2(2)2(2
1'2'1321
)4(42
'2'1123'2
3'2
3
'13
'13
32 pppppME
pdE
pdI
cell configuration in space
3x
Simulations solve Boltzmann equation:→ test particles and other schemes
Semiclassical kinetic theory:
(Quantum mechanics: )
Important scales for kinetic transport & simulations
E
dmfp
... kinetic transport still valid
5.
22
.32
.23 tr
trtr
R
RR
The drift term is large.
.
.32
.23
.22
trdrift
tr
tr
tr
R
R
R
R
ggggg interactions are essential for kinetic equilibration!
0
2
2
02
2
2
2
2
2
exp)()(tt
E
pt
E
p
E
pt
E
peq
ZZeq
ZZ
(t) gives the timescale of kinetic equilibration.
,/ 22 EPQ Z
),,(
),,(
3
3
3
3
)2(
)2(
txpf
QtxpfQ
pd
pd
t
fpdtfpd tQ
nQ
ntQ 3
3
3
3
)2()2()(
11)(
322322 IIIfE
P
t
f
322322)( CCCCtQ drift
,1 .
32.
23.
22. trtrtrtr
drift RRRR
)(
)(
tQQ
tQ
eq
bottom-up scenario of thermalization
R.Baier, A.H.Mueller, D.Schiff and D.T.Son, PLB502(2001)51
• Qs-1 << t << -3/2 Qs
-1 Hard gluons with momenta about Qs are freedand phase space occupation becomes of order 1.
• -3/2 Qs-1 << t << -5/2 Qs
-1 •(h+h h+h+s)Hard gluons still outnumber soft ones, but soft gluons give most of theDebye screening.
• -5/2 Qs-1 << t << -13/5 Qs
-1
(h+h h+h+s; s+s s+s; h+s sh+sh+s)Soft gluons strongly outnumber hard gluons.Hard gluons loose their entire energy to the thermal bath.
• After -13/5 Qs-1 the system is thermalized: T ~ t-1/3, T0 ~ 2/5 Qs
Au-Au – Reconstruction partons with high-pt too rare simulate large number of initial conditions select events according to highest pt-(test)particle simulate only selected events and weight results
full: 200000 events; reconstruction: 40 events per pt-bin, ~1000 total