Pultrusion in Wind - STRUCTeam Ltd€¦ · Why Pultrusion? Industry Perspective ¤ Historically,...
Transcript of Pultrusion in Wind - STRUCTeam Ltd€¦ · Why Pultrusion? Industry Perspective ¤ Historically,...
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 1
Pultrusion for Wind Blade SparcapsA n A s s e s s m e n t o f B u s i n e s s C a s e s a n d C h a l l e n ge s
14th World Pultrusion Conference
1-2 March 2018, Vienna, Austria
Dr. Rakesh Raj
Dr. Yves Didier
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 2
S T R U C Te a m I n t ro d u c t i o n
150+ completed projects
One of the leading independent composite consultancy
Cross-sector experience and great flexibility
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 3
I n t ro d u c t i o n
Business cases for wind energy rotor blades design are heavily affected by cost of chosen manufacturing technology¤ Structural composites = prepreg and/or infusion – dominant technologies
(established and developed in other markets).
OEMs continuously looking for cost effective and robust technologies. ¤ So blade design and associated manufacturing processes must deliver an
overall package for low cost, high quality and high production volumes, scalable anywhere in the world.
PULLWIND
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 4
W hy P u l t r u s i o n ?
Industry Perspective¤ Historically, Pultrusion introduced in wind energy in 2010
• Only limited to carbon. No glass fibres-based pultrusion!
• Driven by cost and product robustness requirements
• Used in the spar cap region of the blade
¤ OEMs are actively seeking their own pultrusion solutions. But without adequate supply chain positioning and relevant expertise, this is challenging.
• Expertise required in Design, Materials technology and Manufacturing
• Supply chain knowledge required for Equipment, Resin and Fibres
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 5
W hy P u l t r u s i o n ?
Design consideration¤ Pultrusion offer benefits on FVF and therefore Specific Stiffness
Designing with pultrusion is difficult
Benefits are easily identifiable in the design
Supply Chain is complex for very high volumes
STL785C – STRUCTeam 80m Blade design deploying carbon sparcaps
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 6
W hy P u l t r u s i o n ?
Product Robustness
¤ Cost of Poor Quality
• Sparcap is structurally critical!
• Known fatigue failure in large blades due to sparcaps wrinkles
• NCR/ factory downtime costs for wrinkle repairs (12% capacity)
• Scrap rate for blades affected by wrinkles is 1-3%
• Pultrusions = level of ‘guaranteed’ quality
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 7
W hy P u l t r u s i o n ?
Cost Implications¤ Pultruded solutions offer lower overall blade cost (vs. infusion)
¤ Material Cost
• GRP and CFRP both show potential EUR/kg savings
• Pultrusion use lower cost resin systems
• Sparcaps are approx. 30% of total blade mass, so large potential material volume
¤ CAPEX
• Pultusion tooling fairly basic
• Lower workshop space costs
¤ OPEX
• Suited to automated processes
• Shorter blade manufacturing cycle times
Blade masses (kg)
Rest of the bladeSparcaps
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 8
O E M s ’ U n m e t N e e d s
Current Spar Cap Technology
• 90% infusion-based/ 5% prepreg-based (Carbon)/ 5% pultrusion-based (Carbon)
• CF Pultruded spar cap pioneered and patented
Unmet Needs
• Epoxy solution for GF / CF pultrusion
• Enhanced fiber impregnation and easy
processing at pultrusion speed > 1 m/min
• Solid supply chain for pultruded part
• Technology freedom to Practice
• Ready to use integrated solution
OEMs need a solution¤ Robust ‘off-the shelf’ pultrusion
product
• Specific properties, pricing, supply chain security, DNV-GL
¤ Tailored blade designs
• Demonstrable performance gains
• Certifiable designs
PULLWIND AS A SOLUTION
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 9
C o n c e p t P re s e n t a t i o n - P U L LW I N D
For a typical 80 m blade
• 5-15% Lower cost blade
• 15% CAPEX reduction
• 20% Man Hour reduction
• Lower defect rate
Spar cap
Root section Main mold finishing
Blade manufacturer
Spar capModules supplier
Root section Main mold finishing
Blade manufacturer
Today
Tomorrow
Blade Fabrication process
BENEFITS FOR BLADE
MANUFACTURER
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 10
B u s i n e s s c a s e - S T L B l a d e Po r t fo l i o
Blade Name Unit STL50 STL50c STL565 STL635 STL635-2 STL690c STL800 STL785c STL820cBlade Length [m] 50.0 50.0 56.5 63.5 63.5 69.0 78.5 78.5 82.0Rated Power [MW] 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 6.0 6.0 5.0Wind Class [IEC] IIIB IIIB S S IIIA IIIA IIA IIA IIIBAverage Wind Speed [m/s] 7.5 7.5 7 9 7.5 7.5 8.5 8.5 7.5PCD [mm] 2110 2110 2110 2600 2600 3000 4100 4100 3600Root Connection Solution T-Bolt T-Bolt T-Bolt T-Bolt T-Bolt T-Bolt Insert Insert InsertRoot Connection 60xM36 60xM36 64xM36 74xM36 64xM39 82xM36 140xM36 140xM36 82xM36
96xM42 96xM42Pre-bend [m] 1 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3Max Chord Length [m] 3.63 3.63 3.55 4.16 4.00 4.58 5.36 5.10 5.30Process Infusion Infusion Infusion Infusion Infusion Prepreg Infusion Prepreg PrepregSparcap MaterialMaterial
Glass/Epoxy
Carbon/Epoxy
Glass/Epoxy
Glass/Epoxy
Glass/Epoxy
Carbon/Epoxy
Glass/Epoxy
Carbon/Epoxy
Carbon/Epoxy
Core PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVCNominal Rotational Speed [rpm] 15 15 12 12.5 12.5 11.1 12 12 11.34Cut-in Wind Speed [m/s] 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Cut-out Wind Speed [m/s] 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25Center of Gravity [m] 14.8 12.2 15.9 20.11 22.77 16.35 27.35 23.27 23.65Weight (excl. root connection) [kg] 9100 7200 11030 21150 17100 18390 33600 23870 225601st Flapwise Freqruency [Hz] 0.67 0.86 0.547 0.442 0.427 0.652 0.387 0.492 0.5311st Edgewise Frequency [Hz] 0.97 1.272 0.878 0.914 0.693 0.989 0.703 0.806 0.823
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 11
B l a d e Te c h n o l o g y O p t i o n s
Core Choice
Spar Cap Process/Form
Primary Material Choice
STL800/STL785c Blade Design Material Options
Glass
Infusion
PVC C70 PVC+Balsa PET T92 PET T10
PrePreg Pultrusion
Carbon
PrePreg Pultrusion
STL Detailed Cost Model 80m Blade¤ Material Costs
¤ Labour Costs
¤ CAPEX (Tooling)
¤ Cycle Time
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 12
B l a d e We i g h t
42%47%
35%21% 18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
Blade Weight
Shell + SW Sparcap Root
100%
107%
79%
100%
80%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
Sparcap Weight
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 13
C A P E X & O P E X
100%
93%
91%
100%
89%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
CAPEX
100%
72% 70%
100%
72%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
OPEX
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 14
C yc l e T i m e
100%
95%
92%
100%
97%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
Cycle Time Reduction
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Infusion Pultrusion
Tack Time
Post cure
Bonding
Lightning fittings
Prefeb to Shell
Demoulding
Curing
Bagging & Infusion
Lay up
Tool preparation
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 15
B l a d e To t a l C o st
100%
98%
94%
100%
91%91%
88%88%
TM+ Glass ECT-Glass TM+ Glass SM Carbon SM Carbon
Infusion Pultrusion Prepreg Pultrusion
Total Blade Cost
Total Blade Costs - Europe with European Pultrusions Total Blade Costs - Europe with Asia Pultrusions
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 16
O E M C h a l l e n ge s - a d o p t p u l t r u s i o n
Integration into Blade design
Blade manufacturing
process development
Pultruded product process
development
Resin formulation
Fiber type and grade selection
Pultruded section
definition
Blade designer Resin supplier Blade Manufacturer Pultruder Fiber supplier
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 17
P U L LW I N D – C o n s o r t i u m O rga n i s a t i o nB
lad
e D
esig
nSu
pp
ort
–ST
L &
DN
V-G
LB
lade
Man
ufactu
ring P
rocess
Develo
pm
ent -
STL
Pultruded Product Development - STL
Pultruded Section
Definition
Resin Formulation
Pultrusion Production
Process
Fibre Type and Grade
Carbon – on demand
Integration into Blade Technology - STL
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 18
C o n c l u s i o n
Pullwind Business case:¤ Overall cost savings achievable for all Business Cases with pultruded sparcaps
• Between 9% and 12% for 80m Blades
• Most benefitial case is for a blade manufactured in Europe with pultrusionsshipped from low labour cost country (i.e. China)
¤ Pultruded sparcap designs:
• Allow for high reduction in OPEX (labour costs - 15 - 30%)
• Allow for reduction in CAPEX
→ 10% CAPEX reduction for 80m blade
→ No need for prepreg cutting machine, consolidation table and cold storage
• Allow for overall Blade weight reduction (up to 3 - 7%)
Pullwind as a Solution¤ Established pultruded product – Fulfil DNV-GL requirement for blade
¤ STL have design and manufacturing support to help adopt pultrusion in retrofit existing blade and or new generation blade designs
¤ Flexibility of supply chain
© Copyright STRUCTeam Ltd Slide: 19
C o n t a c t :
Julien Sellier– Managing Director
E-mail: [email protected]
www.structeam-ltd.com