Pulsecor Presentation

52

Transcript of Pulsecor Presentation

Page 1: Pulsecor Presentation
Page 2: Pulsecor Presentation

What is this?

• Simple accurate means of Simple accurate means of measuring arterial waveforms from measuring arterial waveforms from a regular blood pressure cuff.a regular blood pressure cuff.

Page 3: Pulsecor Presentation

• Analyzes components of the arterial Analyzes components of the arterial pulse wavepulse wave

Page 4: Pulsecor Presentation

Arterial Pulse Wave

• Result of 2 processes:Result of 2 processes:

– Ejection wave from the heart (stroke Ejection wave from the heart (stroke volume)volume)

– Modification of wave as it is ejected Modification of wave as it is ejected into a somewhat non-compliant or stiff into a somewhat non-compliant or stiff arterial system (impedence/vascular arterial system (impedence/vascular resistance)resistance)

Page 5: Pulsecor Presentation

Analysis of the Vascular Wave

• In theory, can provide informationIn theory, can provide information

– Cardiac functionCardiac function

– State of the arterial systemState of the arterial system

Page 6: Pulsecor Presentation

• The analysis is complex and The analysis is complex and interrelated and the term interrelated and the term “ventriculo-vascular coupling” has “ventriculo-vascular coupling” has been introduced to describe this been introduced to describe this relationship.relationship.

Page 7: Pulsecor Presentation

How is it recorded?

• Use a regular blood pressure cuff Use a regular blood pressure cuff around the armaround the arm

• Sensor system in the boxSensor system in the box

• Analyze the oscillometric signalAnalyze the oscillometric signal

– Therefore, cuff position does not matterTherefore, cuff position does not matter

Page 8: Pulsecor Presentation

Sequence

• Record blood pressure normallyRecord blood pressure normally

• Cuff deflates for ≈ 5 secsCuff deflates for ≈ 5 secs

• Cuff is reinflated to 30 mmHg above Cuff is reinflated to 30 mmHg above systole (suprasystolic)systole (suprasystolic)

• Held for 12 secs (2 respiratory cycles)Held for 12 secs (2 respiratory cycles)

• Cuff deflatesCuff deflates

Page 9: Pulsecor Presentation

• Recording of suprasystolic signals is Recording of suprasystolic signals is analyzedanalyzed

• Means of multiple variablesMeans of multiple variables

Page 10: Pulsecor Presentation
Page 11: Pulsecor Presentation

Features of Suprasystolic Recording

• Subaudible signals (<20 Hertz)Subaudible signals (<20 Hertz)

– 95% of energy of pulse wave is <1 95% of energy of pulse wave is <1 HertzHertz

• Reproducible at 20-30 mmHg above Reproducible at 20-30 mmHg above systolic pressuresystolic pressure

Page 12: Pulsecor Presentation

Benefits Over Intra-arterial Measurements

• Not influenced by dampening secondary Not influenced by dampening secondary to air or thrombus in arterial lineto air or thrombus in arterial line

• Not influenced by kinking of catheterNot influenced by kinking of catheter

• Stable, reproducible signalsStable, reproducible signals

• Non-invasive, sterility issues, etc.Non-invasive, sterility issues, etc.

• No technical skill requiredNo technical skill required

Page 13: Pulsecor Presentation

Benefits over Tonometry at the Wrist (AtCor – Omron)

• More proximal signals (axillary vs. radial More proximal signals (axillary vs. radial artery)artery)

• Less technician dependentLess technician dependent

• Single measurement (Tonometry Single measurement (Tonometry measures BP separately)measures BP separately)

• Quicker and more simpleQuicker and more simple

Page 14: Pulsecor Presentation

• What can you measure?What can you measure?

• What do the waves mean?What do the waves mean?

Page 15: Pulsecor Presentation

Physiology

Distal aorta

Exit of heart

DirectDirect

Reflected

Page 16: Pulsecor Presentation

Pulse Wave

• Incident waveIncident wave

•Reflection waveReflection wave

Page 17: Pulsecor Presentation

Wave Reflections

Page 18: Pulsecor Presentation

Intra-arterial Tracing

Incident Incident wavewave

Aortic Aortic reflection reflection

wavewave

Late Late reflection reflection

wavewave

Dicrotic Dicrotic notchnotch

Page 19: Pulsecor Presentation

Intra-arterial tracing

Pulsecor suprasystolic waveform

Concurrent Signals

Page 20: Pulsecor Presentation

RWR = Reflection Wave Ratio (da/ab x 100)

PS1 = Suprasystolic pressure wave amplitude

dp/dt = Contractility (Peak change in slope of PS1)

RWTT = Reflected Wave Transit Time (a-c)

SEP = Systolic Ejection Period (a-e)

RWR (reflection wave ratio) = da/ab x 100

PS1

RWTT

a

b

c

d

e

ab

da

SEP

dp

/dt

Page 21: Pulsecor Presentation

What can waves tell you or be used for?

• Vascular screeningVascular screening

• Monitoring long term medical Monitoring long term medical therapy, e.g., antihypertensivetherapy, e.g., antihypertensive

• Monitoring acute physiological Monitoring acute physiological changes in critical care changes in critical care environmentenvironment

Page 22: Pulsecor Presentation

Vascular Screening

• RWR increases withRWR increases with

– AgeAge

– HypertensionHypertension

– Vascular stiffnessVascular stiffness

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

RWR = 17%

RWR = 65%

RWR = 325%

Page 23: Pulsecor Presentation

Baseline Reflection Wave Ratio vs. Age (n=200 hips)

R = 0.491

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

30 40 50 60 70 80 90

RWR > 400% are over 70 years of age

Age

Page 24: Pulsecor Presentation

Baseline RWTT* vs. Age(n=200 hips)

*surrogate of pulse wave velocity

Age

.08

.1

.12

.14

.16

.18

.2

.22

.24

.26

.28

.3

30 40 50 60 70 80 90

R = 0.495

Page 25: Pulsecor Presentation

Arterial Stiffness vs. Brachial Blood Pressure

• Stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease and better guide to treatmentStronger predictor of cardiovascular disease and better guide to treatment• Stronger than other cardiovascular risk factorsStronger than other cardiovascular risk factors

Major Clinical Study OutcomeCAFE STUDY (Part of the Pfizer-

sponsored ASCOT study) - measured more than 2000 patients in the UK and Scandinavia, 2001-2006

Central blood pressure measurement showed big differences using two different drug regimens, clearly explaining different patient outcomes where brachial pressures showed no difference

USA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH’s STRONG HEART Study – measured more than 2400 patients for an average 4 years

Showed central pressures were strong predictors of cardiovascular outcomes, while brachial pressures were less predictive

REASON – Q: Does central pressure augmentation predict CV outcomes in renal failure patients?

Pressure augmentation was independently predictive of outcomes

ROTTERDAM - Q: Is arterial stiffness associated with risk of coronary heart disease and stroke?

Showed arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease and stroke in asymptomatic individuals

Page 26: Pulsecor Presentation

Response to Medical Treatment: Effect of Stopping Losartan 50 mg/day

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4Day 5 after stopping LosartanOn Losartan

• BP = 112/68 (80)BP = 112/68 (80) mmHgmmHg

• RWR = 33%RWR = 33%• dp/dt = 10 mmHg/secdp/dt = 10 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.6 mmHgPS1 = 0.6 mmHg

• BP = 144/85 (101) mmHgBP = 144/85 (101) mmHg

• RWR = 125%RWR = 125%• dp/dt = 15 mmHg/secdp/dt = 15 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.98 mmHgPS1 = 0.98 mmHg

Page 27: Pulsecor Presentation

CAFE Study

• Williams et al: Differential impact of Williams et al: Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation 2006; 113: 1213-25Circulation 2006; 113: 1213-25

Page 28: Pulsecor Presentation

Monitoring Acute Monitoring Acute Physiological Physiological ChangesChanges

Page 29: Pulsecor Presentation

Total Hip Replacement

• 200 patients on operating table200 patients on operating table

• Supine and awake prior to sedationSupine and awake prior to sedation

• Non-selectedNon-selected

– Many treated with ACE inhibitors etc.Many treated with ACE inhibitors etc.

Page 30: Pulsecor Presentation

Total Knee Replacement

• 44 patients44 patients

• Randomized to ephedrine versus Randomized to ephedrine versus phenylephrine under extensive phenylephrine under extensive epidural anesthesiaepidural anesthesia

Page 31: Pulsecor Presentation

Pulsecor Changes

PropofolPropofol VasodilatorVasodilator

PhenylephrinePhenylephrine VasoconstrictorVasoconstrictor

Phenyl + Extensive Phenyl + Extensive epidural anesthesiaepidural anesthesia Cardiac DepressionCardiac Depression

Ephedrine (inotropic Ephedrine (inotropic agent)agent) Cardiac StimulationCardiac Stimulation

FluidFluid

Page 32: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Propofol

• Sedative/anesthetic agentSedative/anesthetic agent

• Known arterial dilatorKnown arterial dilator

• Mild cardiac depressionMild cardiac depression

Page 33: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Propofol(n=200)

BaselineBaseline PropofolPropofol P ValueP Value

MAPMAP 100 ± 11100 ± 11 80 ± 1280 ± 12 <0.0001<0.0001

Pulse Pulse PressurePressure 60 ± 1260 ± 12 45 ± 845 ± 8 <0.0001<0.0001

RWR (%)RWR (%) 130 ± 110130 ± 110 70 ± 5070 ± 50 <0.0001<0.0001

RWTTRWTT 0.16 ± .030.16 ± .03 0.19 ± .030.19 ± .03 <0.0001<0.0001

dp/dtdp/dt 9.4 ± 4.49.4 ± 4.4 8.2 ± 3.88.2 ± 3.8 <0.0001<0.0001

PS1PS1 0.541 ± .270.541 ± .27 0.498 ± .240.498 ± .24 0.00070.0007

Page 34: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Propofol (vasodilator)

• BP = 136/84 (99) mmHgBP = 136/84 (99) mmHg• HR = 79 bpmHR = 79 bpm

• RWR = 111%RWR = 111%• dp/dt = 5.63 mmHg/secdp/dt = 5.63 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.31 mmHgPS1 = 0.31 mmHg

• BP = 113/66 (78) mmHgBP = 113/66 (78) mmHg• HR = 80 bpmHR = 80 bpm

• RWR = 59.5%RWR = 59.5%• dp/dt = 5.91 mmHg/secdp/dt = 5.91 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.34 mmHgPS1 = 0.34 mmHg

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Page 35: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Intravenous Phenylephrine

• VasoconstrictionVasoconstriction

Page 36: Pulsecor Presentation

Vasoconstriction(TKR; n=22)

PropofolPropofol EA* + EA* + PhenylPhenyl P ValueP Value

MAPMAP 76 ± 876 ± 8 84 ± 884 ± 8 <0.0001<0.0001

HRHR 77 ± 1077 ± 10 59 ± 959 ± 9 <0.0001<0.0001

RWRRWR 56 ± 3056 ± 30 149 ± 69149 ± 69 <0.0001<0.0001

RWTTRWTT 0.193 ± .020.193 ± .02 0.178 ± .030.178 ± .03 =0.0378=0.0378

*EA = Epidural anesthesia

Page 37: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Phenylephrine (vasoconstrictor)

• BP = 115/70 (82) mmHgBP = 115/70 (82) mmHg• HR = 76 bpmHR = 76 bpm

• RWR = 42%RWR = 42%

• BP = 117/71 (84) BP = 117/71 (84) mmHgmmHg

• HR = 63 bpmHR = 63 bpm

• RWR = 212%RWR = 212%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Page 38: Pulsecor Presentation

Hand in Ice

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

• BP = 122/64 (81) mmHgBP = 122/64 (81) mmHg• HR = 61 bpmHR = 61 bpm

• RWR = 40.7%RWR = 40.7%• dp/dt = 17.6 mmHg/secdp/dt = 17.6 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 1.05 mmHgPS1 = 1.05 mmHg

• BP = 152/88 (103) mmHgBP = 152/88 (103) mmHg• HR = 75 bpmHR = 75 bpm

• RWR = 74.7%RWR = 74.7%• dp/dt = 19.96 mmHg/secdp/dt = 19.96 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 1.2 mmHgPS1 = 1.2 mmHg

Page 39: Pulsecor Presentation

Cardiac Depression (Clinical model)

• Extensive epidural Extensive epidural autonomic autonomic blockade of the heartblockade of the heart

• Vasoconstriction Vasoconstriction no cardiac no cardiac stimulationstimulation

Page 40: Pulsecor Presentation

Cardiac Depression (TKR; n=22)

PropofolPropofol EA* + EA* + PhenylPhenyl P ValueP Value

MAPMAP 76 ± 876 ± 8 84 ± 884 ± 8 <0.0001<0.0001

Pulse Pulse PressurePressure 46 ± 946 ± 9 48 ± 848 ± 8 NSNS

HRHR 77 ± 1077 ± 10 60 ± 960 ± 9 <0.0001<0.0001

dp/dtdp/dt 8.6 ± 2.78.6 ± 2.7 5.4 ± 25.4 ± 2 <0.0001<0.0001

PS1PS1 0.52 ± 0.52 ± 0.170.17 0.35 ± 0.140.35 ± 0.14 <0.0001<0.0001

*EA = Epidural anesthesia

Page 41: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Phenylephrine + Extensive Epidural Anesthesia (Cardiac depression)

• BP = 115/70 (82) mmHgBP = 115/70 (82) mmHg• HR = 76 bpmHR = 76 bpm

• RWR = 42%RWR = 42%• PS1 = 0.58 mmHgPS1 = 0.58 mmHg• dp/dt = 11 mmHg/secdp/dt = 11 mmHg/sec

• BP = 117/71 (84) BP = 117/71 (84) mmHgmmHg

• HR = 63 bpmHR = 63 bpm

• RWR = 212%RWR = 212%• PS1 = 0.23 mmHgPS1 = 0.23 mmHg• dp/dt = 3.62 mmHg/secdp/dt = 3.62 mmHg/sec

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Page 42: Pulsecor Presentation

Ephedrine

• Cardiac stimulantCardiac stimulant

Page 43: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Ephedrine(n=109)

Post FluidPost Fluid Post Post EphedrineEphedrine P ValueP Value

MAPMAP 47 ± 747 ± 7 63 ± 1063 ± 10 <0.0001<0.0001

Pulse Pulse PressurePressure 38 ± 7.638 ± 7.6 46 ± 7.846 ± 7.8 <0.0001<0.0001

RWR (%)RWR (%) 29.5 ± 1829.5 ± 18 24.4 ± 2024.4 ± 20 0.0050.005

RWTTRWTT 0.241 0.241 ± .03± .03 0.228 ± .030.228 ± .03 0.00020.0002

dp/dtdp/dt 6.2 ± 2.46.2 ± 2.4 9.4 ± 3.89.4 ± 3.8 <0.0001<0.0001

PS1PS1 0.43 ± .160.43 ± .16 0.62 ± .240.62 ± .24 <0.0001<0.0001

Page 44: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Ephedrine(cardiac stimulant / inotrope)

• BP = 68/30 (40) mmHgBP = 68/30 (40) mmHg• HR = 57 bpmHR = 57 bpm

• RWR = 20%RWR = 20%• dp/dt = 4.72 mmHg/secdp/dt = 4.72 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.36 mmHgPS1 = 0.36 mmHg

• BP = 94/45 (58) mmHgBP = 94/45 (58) mmHg• HR = 64 bpmHR = 64 bpm

• RWR = 14%RWR = 14%• dp/dt = 8.6 mmHg/secdp/dt = 8.6 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.66 mmHgPS1 = 0.66 mmHg

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Page 45: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Exercise(15 min stationary bike, HR ≈130 bpm)

• BP = 129/70 (87) mmHgBP = 129/70 (87) mmHg• HR = 65 bpmHR = 65 bpm

• RWR = 44%RWR = 44%• dp/dt = 11.75 mmHg/secdp/dt = 11.75 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 0.66 mmHgPS1 = 0.66 mmHg

• BP = 164/72 (97) mmHgBP = 164/72 (97) mmHg• HR = 134 bpmHR = 134 bpm

• RWR = 6.2%RWR = 6.2%• dp/dt = 24.6 mmHg/secdp/dt = 24.6 mmHg/sec• PS1 = 1.01 mmHgPS1 = 1.01 mmHg

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Page 46: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Low Dose Epinephrine

• Low dose Low dose 3 µg/min 3 µg/min

• Increase stroke volumeIncrease stroke volume

• Decrease arterial toneDecrease arterial tone

Page 47: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Low Dose Epinephrine

• BP = 91/56 (66) mmHgBP = 91/56 (66) mmHg• HR = 57 bpmHR = 57 bpm

• RWR = 41%RWR = 41%• dp/dt = 7.94 mmHg/secdp/dt = 7.94 mmHg/sec• RWTT = 0.22 sec.RWTT = 0.22 sec.• PS1 = 0.64 mmHgPS1 = 0.64 mmHg

Epinephrine (3 Epinephrine (3 µg/min)µg/min)

No EpinephrineNo Epinephrine

• BP = 109/73 (83) mmHgBP = 109/73 (83) mmHg• HR = 49 bpmHR = 49 bpm

• RWR = 118%RWR = 118%• dp/dt = 7.81 mmHg/secdp/dt = 7.81 mmHg/sec• RWTT = 0.17 sec.RWTT = 0.17 sec.• PS1 = 0.46 mmHgPS1 = 0.46 mmHg

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Page 48: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Fluid(n=109)CVP increased 4 mmHg (mean)

Pre FluidPre Fluid Post FluidPost Fluid P ValueP Value

MAPMAP 43 ± 643 ± 6 47 ± 747 ± 7 <0.0001<0.0001

Pulse Pulse PressurePressure 36 ± 736 ± 7 38 ± 7.638 ± 7.6 <0.0001<0.0001

RWR (%)RWR (%) 31 ± 1931 ± 19 29 ± 1829 ± 18 NSNS

RWTTRWTT 0.242 ± .040.242 ± .04 0.241 ± .030.241 ± .03 NSNS

dp/dtdp/dt 5.2 ± 25.2 ± 2 6.2 ± 2.46.2 ± 2.4 <0.0001<0.0001

PS1PS1 0.344 ± .120.344 ± .12 0.431 ± .160.431 ± .16 <0.0001<0.0001

Page 49: Pulsecor Presentation

Effect of Snoring

Page 50: Pulsecor Presentation

Snoring

dPP = 122%

Page 51: Pulsecor Presentation

Snoring Eliminated

dPP = 59%

Page 52: Pulsecor Presentation

Atrial Fibrillation