Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.
-
Upload
juniper-jefferson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.
![Page 1: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Publication / Fit for Purpose
Kirsty AndersonPrincipal Information Analyst
![Page 2: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Publication – Consultation
• Existing cancer waiting times statistics need to be replaced with a new series of figures
• Consultation document produced to summarise ISD’s proposals for the new series of official statistics due to be published
• Consultation started on 23rd October 2009. Consultation document / feedback form emailed to various colleagues and published on the ISD website
• Consultation closed on 8th January and analysis of feedback completed
![Page 3: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Publication – Consultation Feedback• ISD received 31 feedback responses from the
consultation on publication of new cancer waiting times statistics
• Approximately 75% of responses on behalf of the whole organisation or as an individual
3% 3%
16%
3%
3%
56%
3%
10%3%
Academia Audit ScotlandCancer charity ISD ScotlandNHS Board (special - excluding NSS*) NHS Board (territorial)NHS National Services Scotland (excluding ISD) Other UK Government organisationScottish Government
![Page 4: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Publication – Consultation FeedbackProposed tables showing performance against the 62/31day target
• 83% of respondents agreed that Tables 1 & 2 met their needs in full
Area of receipt of referral Number of eligible
referrals1
Number treated
within 62 days
Percentage treated
within 62 days
One or more additional columns for
optional statistics2
Scotland ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZ.Z% ??? ??? NOSCAN3 YYYY YYYY YY.Y% ??? ??? Grampian 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Highland 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Orkney 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Shetland 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Tayside 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Western Isles 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? SCAN4 YYYY YYYY YY.Y% ??? ??? Borders 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Dumfries & Galloway 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Fife 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Lothian 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? WOSCAN5 YYYY YYYY YY.Y% ??? ??? Ayrshire & Arran 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Forth Valley 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Greater Glasgow & Clyde 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ??? Lanarkshire 0000 0000 00.0% ??? ???
![Page 5: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Publication – Consultation FeedbackProposed table outline for trend information on performance
against targets
• 87% of respondents said that they were happy with the proposed presentation of trend data
Area of receipt of referral
Indicator Patients first treated during quarter ending
31st Mar 2010
30th June 2010
30th Sept 2010
31st Dec 2010
31st Mar 2011
Scotland Number of
eligible referrals1 ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ
Number treated within 62 days
ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ
% treated within 62 days
ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z%
Other optional statistics2
??? ??? ??? ??? ???
NOSCAN3 Number of
eligible referrals1 YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY
Number treated within 62 days
YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY
% treated within 62 days
YY.Y% YY.Y% YY.Y% YY.Y% YY.Y%
Other optional statistics2
??? ??? ??? ??? ???
Grampian Number of
eligible referrals1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
Number treated within 62 days
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
% treated within 62 days
00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0%
Other optional statistics2
??? ??? ??? ??? ???
Repeated below for all other cancer networks and Boards
![Page 6: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Publication – Consultation FeedbackProposed graphs and tables showing the overall distribution of waiting times
• Nearly 70% of responders were happy with the distribution of waiting times proposals
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Days since receipt of referral
Per
cen
tag
e o
f p
atie
nts
sti
ll w
aiti
ng
62-day target
5% tolerance on target
Cancer type Length of wait from receipt of referral to treatment2 0-14
days 15-28 days
29-42 days
43-62 days
63-69 days
70-79 days
80 days or more
All cancer types* ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% ZZ.Z% Breast 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Colorectal 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Head & Neck 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Lung 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Lymphomas 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Melanoma 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Gynae – ovarian Gynae - cervical 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Upper GI 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Urological 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% 00.0%
![Page 7: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Publication – Consultation FeedbackProposed tables showing exclusions and waiting times adjustments
• 79% of respondents agreed with the proposals to publish data on exclusions and waiting times adjustments
A B C D E F G H I Area of receipt of referral Total
referrals2 Referrals not covered by
62-day target3
Referrals covered by 62-day target Referrals included in analysis but with waiting time
adjustment made7
Initial number4 Excluded from target calculations5
Number included in analysis6
Number Median adjustment8
One or more additional columns for further information9
Scotland ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZ ??? NOSCAN YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY ??? Grampian 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? Highland 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? Orkney 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? Shetland 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? Tayside 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? Western Isles 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? SCAN YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY YYYY ??? Borders 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ??? etc. (Further rows removed for reasons of space here)
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ???
![Page 8: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Publication – Consultation (Next steps)
• Further comments made by responders on these tables/publication are being considered at present
• Working with the Scottish Government statisticians to propose recommendations for final publication tables/layout
• A paper will be produced for the consideration of the National Cancer Waiting Times Delivery Group
• Finalised Consultation Feedback Report will be published (March 2010)
![Page 9: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Publication – Timeline
New 62-day targetExcluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during January–March 2010
(Quarter 1)
June 2010
September 2010New 31- and 62-day targetsExcluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during
April–June 2010(Quarter 2)
December 2010New and 31- and 62-day
targetsIncluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during
July–Sept 2010(Quarter 3)
FROM WHAT COVERING
New 62-day targetExcluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during January–March 2010
(Quarter 1)
June 2010
September 2010New 31- and 62-day targetsExcluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during
April–June 2010(Quarter 2)
December 2010New and 31- and 62-day
targetsIncluding patients referred
through screening programmes
Patients who started their treatment during
July–Sept 2010(Quarter 3)
FROM WHAT COVERING
• Existing cancer waiting times targets will be published up until May 2010
• Communication to Board Chief Executives confirming that current data collection for existing targets should cease, to focus on the publication of new targets in June 2010
![Page 10: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Fit for Purpose
• Publication timeline requires the new cancer waiting times data being fit for purpose
– New cancer waiting times information recorded by NHS Boards must be of sufficient quality and reliability to publish
– Figures showing performance against the new targets will first be published on ISD’s website during June 2010
– ISD Scotland will work with NHS Boards and the Scottish Government to monitor the completeness and quality of the information submitted by NHS Boards
![Page 11: Publication / Fit for Purpose Kirsty Anderson Principal Information Analyst.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082818/56649f0b5503460f94c1e775/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fit for Purpose
• Fit for Purpose exercise to monitor the completeness and quality of the information submitted by NHS Boards
Work with boards and the Scottish Government to assess fit for purpose by:
• Seeking advice from the boards, Scottish Government, ISD New Ways colleagues, and our English and Welsh counterparts
• Produce high-level plan of work activities/tasks, for example:
- Quarterly case ascertainment report - Calculate cohort/baseline for each cancer site - Number of Patients Diagnosed During Quarter (Actual from SCWaTS) - 3 year (2004-2006) Quarterly Average Number of Cancer Registrations - Estimated Case Ascertainment (actual/cancer reg*100) - Compare with existing CWT targets (indicative levels)
• Require boards to re-submit Oct – Dec 09 data, in order to generate an accurate and complete quarterly extract to use as a baseline to analyse fit for purpose