Public Procurement and Sport Events · Olympic Games - one host city and football cities. Ministry...
22
Public Procurement and Sport Events Eliane Viegas Mota Director, Auditing of Social Policies Ministry of Transparency and Comptroller General
Transcript of Public Procurement and Sport Events · Olympic Games - one host city and football cities. Ministry...
Public Procurement and Sport Events
Eliane Viegas MotaDirector, Auditing of Social Policies
Ministry of Transparency and Comptroller General
The Challenges of Hosting Major Sports Events
The Brazilian Experience
Panamerican/Parapanamerican Games Rio 2007
Federations Cup FIFA 2013
World Cup FIFA 2014
Olympic/Paraolympic Games Rio 2016
Collegiate Bodies To Coordinate and Plan the World Cup 2014 (Olympic Games 2016)
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE (Strategic Coordination / Planning Cycles)
World Cup’s Management
Committee (CGCOPA)
World Cup’s Executive Group (GECOPA)
Responsibility Committee (Host Cities)
CGCOPA(STRATEGIC)
GECOPA(TACTICAL)
Chambers(OPERATIONAL)
Steering Committee for the World CupDevelops directives for the strategic plan for the World Cup
Executive Committee for the World CupEstablishes the strategic plan and goals
Earmarks related actions in the budget
Coordinates actions carried out with federal resources
Thematic Chambers (Ministries)
Proposes policies and technical recommendations
Health, sustainability, touristic development & culture, education & labor, and
transparency
Private events, with requirements definition by theorganizers (FIFA and IOC)
Public investments (investments made by governmentagencies)
Public investments and public procurement
World Cup - 12 host cities (unnecessary)
Olympic Games - one host city and football cities
Ministry of Sport with a central role in coordinating theorganization of major events
Lack and difficulty of adequate coordination of initiatives(central government and local governments)
Situations that stand out
- Severe planning failures
- Problems regarding the disclosure of information related to the investments made (resources applied)
- Rigid timeline for completion of interventions
- Excessive requirements imposed by organizers
- Selection process of host countries/cities
Some (good) practices – the "brazilian case”- Development of specific sections of the Transparency
Portal (“Copa 2014” and "Jogos Rio 2016”)- Creation of a Task Force under the MPF (Federal
Prosecutor Office) for monitoring the works for the WCup
- Audit actions conducted by CGU (WCup and Olympics)- Creation of a Task Force for monitoring the works for
the WCup and Olympics – federal level (initiatives/deadlines/schedules)
- Monitoring conducted by Federal Court of Accounts
Transparency Portal - Section “Copa 2014”
Information were available (but no longer available)
Transparency Portal - Section “Jogos Rio 2016”
“Incomplete, unclear and disorganized”
Very difficult to obtain the informations required
http://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/rio2016/
Infrastructure
Summary Table
Highlights
Security Actions
Development of High Performance Athletes
MPF Task Force (World Cup 2014)
Recommendations to Public Managers- Arena Amazônia- Maracanã- Arena Pantanal
Schedule was an important concern
Olympic/Paraolympic Games: no task force
Improve the detailing of designs
Revision of the composition of services
Implementation of control mechanisms Adjustments in procurements
Analysis performed by CGU – World Cup
Stadium/Arenas
Analysedaprox. USD 1 billion (3 Stadiums)
In engineering Designsand their Execution
(Manaus, Rio de Janeiro, Cuiabá)
Overestimated Budget (Unit Price and/or Quantities);
Designs of poor quality;
Effective Reduction of Aprox. USD 100 million
Analysis performed by CGU – World Cup
Maracanã Stadium – Rio de Janeiro/RJ – March/2012
• The initial analysis by CGU in August
2011 found USD 87 Million overprice
and other irregularities
• Decision by the Federal Court of
Accounts in September 2011 – USD
48.4 Million overprice after consultations
between CGU and the state government
Analysis performed by CGU – World Cup
Amazon Stadium – Manaus/AM – March/2012
• The initial analysis by CGU in November
2011 found USD 34 Million overprice and
other irregularities
• Decision by the Federal Court of Accounts
in August 2012 – expanded the scope of
audits. USD 43 Million overprice after
consultations between CGU and the state
government
Analysis performed by CGU – World Cup
Pantanal Arena – Cuiabá/MT – February 2013
• The analysis by CGU in July 2011
found an amount of USD 34 Million in
irregularities in the execution of the
contract, like unjustly anticipated
payments and additions to the
contract.
Analysis performed by CGU – World Cup
Technical visits (once a month) to monitor the development of Stadiums/Arenas (schedule, stage of works, procurement informations)
Publication of the information at Transparency Portal
Analysis performed by CGU – Olympic/Paraolympic Games
The analysis performed by CGU in December 2015 foundan amount of USD 34 Million in irregularities in theexecution of a contract (25% of the contract value)for the contruction of venues in the cluster of Deodoro.
Eliane Viegas [email protected]
+55 61 20207009
Visit de Transparency Portalwww.portaldatransparencia.gov.br
