Public Attitudes to the use of Biometrics in Transport Smartcard Schemes Phil Blythe Professor of...
-
Upload
edmund-davis -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Public Attitudes to the use of Biometrics in Transport Smartcard Schemes Phil Blythe Professor of...
Public Attitudes to the use of Biometrics in Transport Smartcard Schemes
Phil BlytheProfessor of Intelligent Transport SystemsDirector:Transport Operations Research Group,University of Newcastle upon Tyne
SNF Northern Showcase Event, Kingston Park, 26th October 2004
Structure Why Biometrics Identity Theft Authentication and
Identification Options Biometric Characteristics Assessment of Options Applications of
biometrics in Transport Attitudinal Questionnaire Summary of Findings
TORG Research in Area of Smartcards
TORG is an established centre of excellence in the area of smartcard research.
Research covers application development, standards, policy, innovative service delivery, market/business analysis and expert advice to Governments, local authorities and agencies.
Developed an innovative solution for smartcard applications software for a high-speed multi-lane electronic tolling and Congestion charging application Coordinated a highly successful Integrated Applications of Digital Sites project In the 4th Framework which developed a framework for future citizen-based Smartcards. More than 2 million cards are now in use.Developed the University smart campus card using the DISTINCT architecture
Integrated Transport Smartcard Organisation has developed an Interoperable ticketing specification for the UK. TORG undertook the initial auditing role for the ITSO steering committee As well as a study of the implication for legacy smartcard ticketing schemes
TORG is a member of the Transport Card Forum Steering Committeeand advises on smartcard standards and emerging technologies
TORG is a member of the eEurope smartcard charter
TORG is a member of the North East Regional Smartcard Consortium Steering Committee. They provide advice and research to support the development of a region-wide local authority and transport smartcard schemeTORG provided expertise to the eEnvoy’s Smartcard Policy Working Group ( SCPWG) which is developing a policy Framework for the future of Government SmartcardsTORG provides expertise on policy and standardisation to European and International bodies
Why Biometrics? Smartcards are increasingly being used as a
payment and access token by the transportation sector.
High value ticketing (such as an annual rail pass) and the need to ensure the card-holder is indeed who he or she is claiming to be suggest some form of authentication may be required for certain applications.
Following 9/11 criminal activity is not the only concern and identity fraud for terrorist purposes is also a major worry.
Biometrics may offer some solutions to this problem – but not yet well researched within the transport sector
Why? Identify Fraud The total cost of all types of economic fraud in
the United Kingdom is thought to be at least £13.8 billion per annum (Cabinet Office, 2002).
Of this identity theft/fraud is estimated to cost the economy a minimum of £1.3 billion each year, split equally between the public and private sectors (Secretary of State, 2002).
Whilst in America some 1,200 people suffer from identity fraud each day (Etzioni, 1999).
There is growing consensus, between the public and private sectors that the amount of identity fraud is growing in the UK
The problem is increasing!
Figures from CIFAS, the United Kingdom’s fraud prevention service showed an increase of identity fraud of 462% in 2000 compared to 1999 and an increase of a further 122% in 2001 (Cabinet Office, 2002).
3 Elements that make an identity
1. Biographical identity - Which builds up over time. This covers life events and how a person interacts with structured society
2. Attributed identity - The components of a person’s identity that are given at birth, including their full name, date and place of birth, parents’ names and addresses.
3. Biometric identity: Attributes that are unique to an individual, i.e. fingerprints, voice, retina, facial structure, DNA profile, hand geometry, heat radiation, etc.
Source: Cabinet Office 2002
Categories of Authentication
1. Something you know – This generally involves a password, personal identification number code, a secret handshake, mother maiden name etc.
2. Something you have – This generally involves some type of ‘token’ to allow access, e.g. a key, a ticket etc.
3. Something you are – This is a unique individual living trait of some kind that an individual possesses i.e. biometrics.
Level of security increases from 1 -3
Level of Security
Source: Smartcard Alliance (2002)
A Preference for Biometrics
Biometrics are preferred over the other categories of authentication, because:
The person who wishes to ‘gain access’ has to be physically present at the point of identification.
Biometrics removes the need to remember or carry any form of token that can be forgotten, borrowed, lost or stolen.
So, what are the biometric techniques available?
Primary Characteristics and Requirements: Universality – Every person must have the
characteristic. Uniqueness – There must be sufficient
variability of the characteristic in the population that the application will be used within (no 2 people can be exactly the same).
Persistence – The characteristic must not change with time or be changeable.
Collectability – The characteristic must be easily accessible for collection in a quantitative measurement.
Main Biometric Behavioural and Physical Characteristics
Physical Antibody signatures Blood chemistry Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Ear structure Face Finger Fingerprint Hand geometry Iris scan Nail bed analysis (ridges in finger
nails) Odor (scent) analysis Retina scan Skull measurement Sweat pore analysis Teeth Vascular (vein) heat patterns Voice verification (pioneering
technique)
Behavioural Gait recognition (manner of walking) Keystroke dynamics analysis
(typing patterns) Signature (look) Signature geometry (look as well as
pen pressure, signature speed etc.) Driving style …etc
To be practical? For transport services the biometric
measure must be:Readily accessibleStorable (on a smart card/in a central
system)Non-intrusiveFast(ish) to processSecure and fraud-proofAddress privacy and DPA concerns…. and be reliable to measure…. ….. at an acceptable cost.
Which culminates in a current market share for the leading techniques:
13%
36%17%
5%7%
20% 2%Voice
Fingerprint
Face
Signature
Iris
Hand
Other
Source, Logica 2002
Considering applications in the Transport Sector
Airport Security Airport Check-in General Travel ID Passport Control Vehicle Security Vehicle Preferences
(customised to a particular driver)
Access Control
Transport Sector Applications Employees ID Secure Parking High-Value Ticketing Identification of
Individuals who may be exempt from charges (i.e congestion charging)
Driving licence
Template: On ID Card?
Hand/Finger Scan
Retina Scan
Determining which biometric techniques may be acceptable
Prior to considering what biometric techniques are most applicable for implementation in the transport sector it is necessary to obtain a ‘feel’ as to how such techniques are perceived and understood by the public and which, if any, is accepted by them
Public attitudes Questionnaire In the summer of 2003 a questionnaire was
designed that to examine 4 aspects of attitudes to biometrics: To establish whether the population know what biometrics are. To establish whether the potential user population would be
willing to use a biometric authentication systems in order to identify themselves.
To establish which would be the most preferred options for the way a biometric system is setup e.g. storage template method, most preferred biometric authentication method, etc.
To establish if a biometric system was introduced would there be a need to educate users how to use it.
Questionnaire
The questionnaire was piloted in July 2003
Surveys took place in Newcastle and Manchester in July to September 2003
Second Round Surveys February/March 2004
Sample population by age
61 Or Over
51 To 60
41 To 50
31 To 40
21 To 30
20 Or Under
Missing
Fre
qu
en
cy
100
80
60
40
20
09
39
52
58
92
8
Female respondents: 130Male respondents: 127No gender declared!: 2
Knowledge of biometrics
Knew What Biometrics Means
NoYes
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gender
Female
Male
Missing
5147
4951
Overall:
Yes: 53 responses (20%)No: 206 responses (80%)
Similar response forKnowledge of smartcards
Consider themselves IT literate
Consider Themselves To Be IT Literate
NoYes
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gender
Female
Male
Missing
6146
38
54
Overall
73% (186) IT Literate26% (71) not IT Literate
IT Literate by Age
Consider Themselves To Be IT Technology Literate
NoYes
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Age Category
61 Or Over
51 To 60
41 To 50
31 To 40
21 To 30
20 Or Under
Missing
7
329
20
20
15
25
21
41
Willingness to accept a smartcard identity card in order to access certain service?
Willingness To Accept Smart Card ID Card
Definitely
Probably
Unsure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Fre
qu
en
cy
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
62
146
34
14
Most Preferred Biometric Method
Most Preferred Biometric Method
No Preference
Voice
Signature
Iris
Hand
Fingerprint
Face
Missing
Fre
qu
en
cy
100
80
60
40
20
0
25
711
48
26
94
39
9
Least Preferred Biometric
Least Preferred Biometric Method
No Preference
Voice
Signature
Iris
Hand
Fingerprint
Face
Missing
Fre
qu
en
cy
80
60
40
20
0
25
63
70
33
4
12
42
10
Rank order of preferenceBiometric Method
Most Preferred Frequency
Least Preferred Frequency
Most – Least Preferred
Frequencies
Rank Order Preference
Fingerprint 94 12 82 1st
Hand 26 4 22 2nd
Iris 48 33 15 3rd
Face 39 42 - 3 4th
Voice 7 63 - 56 5th
Signature 11 70 - 59 6th
Would you accept a smartcard Identity card if it contained your preferred biometric method?
Willingness To Accept Biometric Smart Card ID Card
Definitely
Probably
Unsure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Fre
qu
en
cy
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
65
144
30
12
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Missing
Would definitely not use
Would probably not use
Unsure
Would probably use
Would definitely use
Banking
Transport
Willingness to accept most preferred biometric method on a bank card or transport card?
Willingness to accept most preferred biometric method on a bank card?
Willingness To Accept Most Preferred Biometric Method For Banking
Definitely
Probably
Unsure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gender
Female
Male
Missing
4550715633
5450
29
44
67
Breakdown by Gender
Preference for the storage of the biometric template
Preferred Method For Storage of Anonymous Biometric Template
WNLBISAT
No Preference
On A Smart Card
Central Database
Missing
Fre
qu
en
cy
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
40
51
114
53
Would you have privacy concerns if you knew a Government Organisation had a copy of your biometric template?
Privacy Concern Level
Definitely
Probably
Unsure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
Missing
Fre
qu
en
cy
100
80
60
40
20
0
49
66
43
84
15
0102030405060708090
100
Would use
Would Probably use
Unsure/no opinion
Would probably not use
Would definatly not use
Passport
Airline Boarding
Access Control
High value PT tickets
Charging Exemptions
Driving Licence
Use of biometrics in Transport
Summary Smartcards clearly offer new means of
payment and access to transport services. Authentication and the validation of a
persons identity is likely to become more of an issue as fraud and identification theft increases
DVLA, Passport Agency and Home office are all advancing plans for biometric smartcards
Revisions to Homeland Security Act (USA)
Summary (2) Biometrics offers a range of methods for
uniquely identifying the individual However, in practice many of these techniques
are not practical for implementation in the transport environment, either due to cost, complexity, the intrusive nature of the biometric or privacy concerns
Few members of the general public are yet aware and knowledgeable of biometrics of smartcards
Because of that they tend to select authentication methods that they are familiar with and understand (like a finger print)
Summary (3) A majority of respondents would be willing to have a
biometric on a smart card for general government, transport and banking applications (with varying degrees of enthusiasm)
Feel that the biometric information should be retained on the smartcard
Would have privacy concerns if a Government Agency held such information
Need for education and making the case why such biometrics may be needed
New round of surveys are complete – will determine whether attitudes have changed in the past 18 months and whether there is now a greater general knowledge of biometrics and associated issues.