Psychology of Risk 20091009
Transcript of Psychology of Risk 20091009
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
1/25
Liverpool John MooresUniversity
Faculty of Technology & Environment
School of the Built Environment, Liverpool, UK
The Psychology of Risk
Lecture 20091009
Dr Wilfred M. Matipa
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
2/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Why study Psychology?
Risk Management is shaped by the decisionsthat humans have to make
The decision process is characterised by 2important schools of thought
Decision Theory
Prospect Theory
We need a proper understanding of how humans
make risk judgements in various situations This helps us consider the usefulness of
various risk management strategies
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
3/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Something to think about
Understanding risk taking such as gambling,potholing and driving represent one of the mostperplexing problems in the field of psychology.
The need for safety (physical, financial etc) isfundamental, are people who take huge riskstherefore illogical or even mentally ill?
Recent research suggests that normal people aremotivated to take risks as a result of theirpsychological makeup and the nature of thesituation they find themselves in
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
4/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (1) The process of defining a problem setting
boundaries too!!
Framing is a fundamental problem with allforms of risk assessment.
In particular, because of bounded rationality(our brains get overloaded, so we take mentalshortcuts) the risk of extreme events isdiscounted because the probability is too lowto evaluate intuitively.
As an example, one of the leading causes ofdeath is road accidents caused by speeding -partly because any given driver frames theproblem by largely or totally ignoring the riskof a serious or fatal accident
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
5/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (2)
Many of you may have wondered what the point ofstudying Systems Theory
Bounded rationality is a fundamental problem in risk
and we considered this in the context of closed andopen systems
Developed by the Chicago School of the 1950s and1960s
Many definitions of what bounded rationality is Decision making that takes place within an environment of
incomplete information and uncertainty
A form of behaviour associated with uncertainty where individualsdo not examine every possible option open to them, but simply
consider a number of alternatives which happen to occur to them
Complexity TheoryIssue!!
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
6/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (3)
What factors will affect theframing process?
Cultural Bias
Cognitive Bias
NotationalBias
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
7/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (4)
Some typical elements of cognitive biases
Retrospective (Hindsight) bias sometimes called the "I-knew-it-all-along" effect, is the inclination to see past eventsas being predictable
Confirmation bias the tendency to search for or interpretinformation in a way that confirms one's preconceptions.
Self-centeredbias the propensity to claim moreresponsibility for successes than failures (gamblers again!!).It may also manifest itself as a tendency for people to
evaluate ambiguous information in a way beneficial to theirinterests.
The social scientists continue to explore other types!!!
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
8/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (5)
The impact of cultural biases on the framing theproblem
Cultural biases are introduced by the intuitive thoughtprocesses and ways of doing things that are associated
with a certain culture Culture can be taken to mean anything from nationality to
organisational
The problems of cultural bias is central to many schools ofthought difficult to model though!!
In Philosophy, this subject has raised many discussionsparticularly regarding the notion that a willingness tochallenge - That is, whether people who violated the normswere "crazy.
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
9/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Framing (6)
And finally notational biases This sounds rather esoteric but makes perfect sense when
you think about it
Terms used to describe a problem may affect ourunderstanding we touched upon this when discussingdifferences between briefing and project definition
Semantics
How do we intuitively interpret information which is given tous this element of differentiation is the essence ofnotational bias
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
10/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Problem Solving
Framing the problem
Defining the problem
Identifying and evaluating optionsavailable for solving the problem
Deciding which of the options
provides the best solution inthe circumstances
ImplementationFeedback
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
11/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Concepts: Regret
Regret is a concept that is wellversed in Decision Theory whichwe shall cover in a sec
A theory that states that humansintuitively anticipate regret if theymake a wrong choice,
They take this anticipation intoconsideration when makingdecisions.
Fear of regret can play a large role indissuading or motivating someone todo something.
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
12/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory
Decision Theories can help us understand therisk taking/averting process
Decision Theory can be qualitative (social
science application) and quantitative (maths,stats and economics)
Decision Support Theories/Tools/Softwarehave been developed to help solve complexproblems
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
13/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory: Fundamentals
Decision Theories relate to the choice of ONEindividual
The other theory involving multiple individuals
is Game Theory The most famous example of Game Theory
is the Prisoners Dilemma
Li l J h M U i i
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
14/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
The most widely used form of decision theoryargues that preferences among risky alternativescan be described by the maximization the expectedvalue of a numerical utility function (money etc.)
Probability theory is heavily used in order torepresent the uncertainty of outcomes, and BayesLaw is frequently used to model the way in whichnew information is used to revise beliefs.
Decision theory is often used in the form of decision
analysis, which shows how best to acquireinformation before making a decision
Decision Theory
Li l J h M U i i
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
15/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Bayesian Statistics relate to the School of the thought ofEnglish Statistician Thomas Bayes
Considers what degree of confidence we may have, invarious possible conclusions, based on the body ofevidence available (risk/uncertainty)
Consider several alternative hypotheses we test them by predicting consequences of each one, then
conducting experimental tests to observe whether or not thoseconsequences actually occur.
If an hypothesis predicts that something should occur, and thatthing does occur, it strengthens our belief in the truthfulness of thehypothesis.
Conversely, an observation that contradicts the prediction wouldweaken (or destroy) our confidence in the hypothesis
An aside..Bayesian Theories
Li l J h M U i it
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
16/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory
Decision Theory
DecisionTheory underUncertainty
DecisionTheory underRisk
Li l J h M U i it
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
17/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Uncertainty
Two approaches to decision making underuncertainty Optimistic Decision
a decision maker considers the best possible outcome for each
course of action, and chooses the course of action thatcorresponds to the best of the best possible outcomes
Pessimistic Decision
used by a pessimistic decision maker who wants to make aconservative decision. Basically, the decision rule is toconsider the worst consequence of each possible course of
action and chooses the one that has the least worstconsequence.
Li l J h M U i it
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
18/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Uncertainty -Optimistic
Choices Profit
Strong market Fair market Poor market
invest 8000 800 200 -400
invest 4000 400 100 -200
invest 2000 200 50 -100
invest 1000 100 25 -50
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
19/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Uncertainty -Pessimistic
Options Profit
Strong market Fair market Poor market
invest 8000 800 200 -400
invest 4000 400 100 -200
invest 2000 200 50 -100
invest 1000 100 25 -50
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
20/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Uncertainty
Regret is also a decision route!
The difference between what we actually get, and thebetter position that we could have got if a differentcourse of action had been chosen.
Regret is sometimes also called "opportunity loss
Select the option which presents the minimum regret
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
21/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Uncertainty
Choices Regret
Strong market Fair market Poor market
invest 8000 0 0 350
invest 4000 400 100 150
invest 2000 600 150 50
invest 1000 700 175 0
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
22/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Risk
When we are dealing with a decision where thepossible outcomes are given specific probabilities,we say that this a case of decision making underrisk.
In such situations the principle of expected value isused. We calculate the expected value associatedwith each possible course of action, and select thecourse of action that has the highest expected value.
To calculate the expected value for a course of
action, we multiple each possible payoff associatedwith that course of action with its probability, andsum up all the products for that course of action.
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
23/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
Decision Theory Under Risk
Choices Profit expected value
Strong market(probability =0.1)
Fair market(probability= 0.5)
Poor market(probability =0.4)
invest8000
800 200 -400800x0.1+200x0.5+(-400)x0.4=20
invest
4000
400 100 -200400x0.1+100x0.5+(-
200)x0.4=10invest2000
200 50 -100200x0.1+50x0.5+(-100)x0.4=5
invest1000
100 25 -50100x0.1+25x0.5+(-50)x0.4=2.5
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
24/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Faculty of Technology & Environment school of the Built Environment
In Context
Dealing with risk decisions is strongly correlated tothe subjective opinions of humans
In construction, risk decisions are made daily suchas when to order material deliveries
Is it maths, experience or a combination
Try to keep this in mind as we progress through themodule
Liverpool John Moores University
-
8/2/2019 Psychology of Risk 20091009
25/25
Liverpool John Moores University
Key References
1. Kelly, Male and Graham (2004) Value Management of ConstructionProjects, Blackwell
2. Smith, N. J. (1999) Managing Risk in Construction Projects
3. Boussabaine and Kirkham (2003) Whole Life Cycle Costing: Riskand Risk Responses, Blackwell
4. Godfrey, P.S (1996) 'Control of risk: :a guide to the systematicmanagement of risk from construction: SP125' ConstructionIndustry Research Info' Assoc.
5. Chapman C B & Ward S (1997) 'Project Risk Management' Wiley
6. Akintoye, A. (2003) Public Private Partnerships: Managing Risksand opportunities, Blackwell
7. Flanagan, R (1993) Risk Management for Construction, Blackwell
8. Kelly (ed) (2002) Best Value in Construction, Blackwell