Proper Waste Management(Pjo.) Daryll

7/28/2019 Proper Waste Management(Pjo.) Daryll

1/67

PROPER WASTE

MANAGEMENT


2/67

CHAPTER IThis research paper contains a vital information that the

readers should determine the importance of a proper waste

management, on how this activity should undergo in acommunity and should undertake by the citizens of the

community. This research paper states its objectives, its

benefits, its interpretation and analysis based on the study, and

many others. It is also states the number of household in a

particular community practicing the proper waste management

such as proper disposal of human and animal wastes, properdisposal and segregation of the garbage and their awareness of

its possible effects to their health, to their environment, and

most especially to their own community.


3/67

* HISTORY OF THE BARANGAY(Barangay Tayamaan, Mamburao, Occ. Mindoro)

The name of the barangay came from a medicinal plant called tayam

which grew abundantlyin this place during the early days. To cure chest

pain and cough, the medicine man of the indigenous people used to boil

the roots of the said plant and tell the sick person to drink the solution

when asked as to where did he get the medicinal plant, the medicine man

would answerf rom tayamaan .Due to the inward shape of the coast of this place which made it a good

harbor, the Chinese bartered goods with the indigenous people living in

this area during the pre-Spanish era. They avoided pirates who also

sought at the coast of Tayamaan during stormy weather.

When the pirates made Mamburao as their headquarters during the

height of their piratical activities in the Philippines, they used to unloadin Tayamaan the goods they have forcibly taken from the places they

raided.


4/67

The indigenous people left Tayamaan when the pirates as harbor fortheirvintaswith the exception of its coast, the wide plains of this placebecame a forest again.

Since the sea near from Tayamaan is a good fishing ground, a few

families from Lubang, Romblon, Panay, and Cebu decide to settle in thisplace. They built hut along the coast. Aside from fishing, they engagedin logging and farming. Despite the presence of malaria, they stayed inthis settlement until the Japanese soldiers occupied Mindoro in 1942.The people evacuated to their places, to avoid foreign invaders.

When peace was restored, the families who evacuated to other placesreturned to Tayamaan. Years later, families of Ilocano and Bicolano

farmers also migrated to this place. The community grew until it becamea sitio of Mamburao.

In 1949, the people in Tayamaan requested the Municipal Council ofMamburao that their sitio created as barrio. The request was granted.Tayamaan was elevated to the status of a barrio in 1950. Sario de Lunawas elected as the first teniente del barr io

In order that their children would not walk kilometers to be able to

attend classes at Mamburao Elementary School, the parents requestedto the government authorities to open a Public school in Tayamaan. Thedepartment of Education granted this request. In 1960, an elementaryschool was opened in this place.


5/67

Due to benevolence, active service and good relationship with the people,

Tenient e del Barr iode Luna served as the leader of Tayamaan for twenty five

long years. He retired in 1975, during martial law. He was succeeded by

Barangay Captain Rolando Rosales.

During Martial Law period, when Honorable Cesar Servando served asMunicipal Mayor of Mamburao, a concrete pier was constructed in Tayamaan.

The number of sea vessels which loaded and unloaded goods and

passengers in this pier increased.

During the administration of Barangay Captain Segundo Maguad, a

number of school buildings were constructed in Tayamaan. It include the

building donated by the officers and members of Filipino-Chinese Chambers

of Commerce.

In 1998, a tragic incident happened when Barangay Captain Michael

Quintos of Tayamaan and his brother Paul, both sons of Assemblyman

Richardo Quintos, were killed by undentified armed men in a party which

they attended. A group of men, together with a well-known politician of

Occidental Mindoro were tried before the court and sentenced with the

maximum penalty allegedly the crime. The case is presently on appeal before

the Supreme Court.

Aside from the aforementioned leader, those who served as Barangay

Captain of Tayamaan were Silvero Taroma, Salus Sanchez, Domingo

Umerez, Tita Aguilar and Noberto Inmenzo. The leader of the Barangay at

present is Barangay Captain Rocky Gupilan.


6/67

BARANGAY OFFICIALSBarangay Captain:

Hon. Rocky Gupilan

Barangay Councilors:

Hon. Alfredo Cabalagnan

Hon. Noberto Inmenzo Jr.

Hon. Ernesto LiwanagHon. Teresita Robles

Hon. Manolito Navarro

Hon. Arnaldo Insigne

Hon. Christopher de Luna

Treasurer:Hon. Elsie de Luna

Secretary:

Hon. Elizabeth de Guzman

Sangguniang Kabataan Chairman:Hon. Reyghieron Gallardo

Sangguniang Kabataan

Councilors:

Hon. Rachelle Rezari

Hon. Faireen Debie RoblesHon. Kriselle Robles

Hon. Rainer Eugenio

Hon. Gemma Gallardo

Hon. John Evangelista


7/67

THESIS STATEMENT:

A descriptive study about the proper

waste management of 218 household on

Barangay Tayamaan (proper), Mamburao

Occidental Mindoro and its possible effects tothe community, year 2011-2012.


8/67

GENERAL OBJECTIVE:

Generally, this research paper would

like to identify the percentage and the total

number of Respondents who undertakes proper

waste management among 218 households inbarangay Tayamaan(proper), Mamburao,

Occidental Mindoro and its possible effect to

the community, year 2011-2012


9/67

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:Specifically, this research paper seek to:

Define proper waste management;

Determine how is waste management done by every households in suchBarangay;

Give the possible effects of practicing proper waste management of wasteproduct;

Enumerate the beneficiaries of the proper practice of the management wasteproduct;

Provide households basic ways on how to manage waste products; Determine the reason why every community and people should make their

own ways on practicing proper waste management;

Render a big help for those in position to make an immediate actionconcerning the proper waste disposal in such Barangay, based on thecollected answers from the residents;

Get the highly recommended way on how to make every barangay cleaners;

Discover the potential of a community to have a healthy and cleanenvironment as well as its residents; and

Explain how important is proper waste management in every household,animals, community and in global concern, by starring it in Barangay.


10/67

SCOPE AND LIMITATION:This study focused on proper waste management

of about 218 households in Barangay Tayamaan(proper),

Mamburao, Occidental Mindoro, having the total number

of population 1,254. the data was gathered for about three

days and a half, started on January 13, 2012 and was

completed on January 16, 2012, which was Friday up to

Monday noon.

This study highlights the different ways of managing

waste products of every households in the said Barangay,

but it doesnt cover the changes that may happen when

this study was conducted.


11/67

SIGNIFICANCEOFTHE STUDY: For the Researchers:

The researchers would find out the real score in the proper waste

management done by his/her fellow residents in his/her barangay. For the future Researchers:

They can used this thesis as a guide and can innovate this more.They would find their own strategies to conduct and finish the research.

For the Government:

They were benefited because with the help of this study, they can be

able to know the things concerning on waste management that they need tofulfill and supervise.

For the Residents:

The residents are the most benefited because with this study, theywould discover know-how about proper waste management. They are alsobenefited for having clean, healthy and eco-friendly community.

For the Community:

The Community, with the help of this study would maintaincleanliness and orderliness. May taste the real progress and satisfaction forhaving safety environment and a healthy residents.


12/67

OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONOF TERMS: Research:

Research means to search again; to take another carefully look; to find out more; is a

term used in this study; to signify the another look taken because it is possible thatsomething maybe wrong with what we already know.

Knotty:

Something that is hard to solve (problem); it was used as an indication that having

not been collected garbages are not that knotty if only officials in position would

implement a project involving the said condition.

Conceive:To form an idea; indicated as; to make an idea on how to encourage children about

the proper way of waste disposal.

Maneuver:

Skillfully act; noted to be referred to those in position to their people to participate

with them.

Barangay:Is a particular area consisting of community of people, and own government; used

pertaining to the particular area where the survey takes place.

Population:

Refers to the number of people living in a particular area.


13/67

Findings:

Anything that was discovered by seeking; these are the original

data, quantitative and otherwise, derived and taken from the original

sources and which are results of the questionnaires.

Imbibe:To take into the mind in a gradual process; to sink in mind.

Survey:

An activity taken to gather general details or data; a word used in

this study for an objective of seeing a general picture of the population

under investigation and to gather their knowledge about and behaviors

towards the phenomena.

Tots:

A little amount of confident or ability; a word used to express the

confidence burst up to the researchers mode.

Vigilance:

Concern for something; a word used to show how vigilance theevery youth for their community development.

Tayam:

According to the history of the Barangay Tayamaan, it is a

medicine for cough and chest pain; use to denote where the name of

tayamaan came from.


14/67

CHAPTER IIIMETHODOLOGY


15/67

HOW DID YOU UNDERTAKE THERESEARCH?Its Friday afternoon, the first day we started to survey, we went to the first

target household, they refused to face us. Someone shouted that they haveno time. It was the very first day and we already taste refusal, we felt we werebusted, but still, we went on to the next target household, at last someoneface us, then a man shouted to our interview to mind first her child before thenonsense survey were doing, but still she stayed with us; at the end of thevery first day of our survey we gathered forty eight data from the householdwe surveyed.

Until the next day came, another shameful but a bit exiting work to be done.On that sunny day, we went from house to house, for the second time aroundwe encountered households who are interested for the questionnaires webrought for them and there are also some who remained idle, but we werehappy because we accomplish the second day having another eighty sevensurveyed households. As we interviewed then they seriously answered thequestion like it was an examination, but there are some who took it only tofilled their mouth with laugh and judgment, they answered it just for fun, butstill we accepted their answers because we needed it. On our moment ofpissed from that idle respondents, we approach by a woman, she got onequestionnaire from us, while answering it she commented good andencouraging words which filled our vinegar-like gnawing stomach andderived us to continue to continue surveying.


16/67

We stop for a while to have some rest and eat our launch. Aftermaybe an hour we started again, begun in a shanty, we didnt knew who

lived, a little boy approach us and give us five peso coin and said thats all we have . (Maybe they thought we were soliciting, ) welaugh for that matter. Until that second day ended, were still laughing

for that funny day.

Our last day, was not that hard because most of the respondents

cooperate actively and we saw in their face that they are very eager to

participate. But on our way to a house then another house we sawmountains of soft things its kind a irritating, but we still went on until

we gathered date from the needed numbers of respondents.

On that survey we've done though we had encountered such bad

moments but we still learned much as we go.


17/67

KINDOF RESEARCH:

We used Descriptive Research, a widely used research design. This

study had undertaken a design called descriptive research, for the

reason that this design aims to describe the nature of a situation in the

existing time of the study; due to the fact that the main objective of our

study is to obtain information by exploring the causes of a particularphenomena which is waste disposal. Another reason is, the fact that we

had undertaken a survey for an objective of seeing a general picture of

the population under investigation, in terms of socially and

economically characteristics opinions and their knowledge about and

behavior towards proper waste management. Questionnaire, personal

interviews and observation also made it reliable that descriptive

research had made this study.


18/67

FEELINGSAT FIRST:Were hearing the word Thesis before, we heard that its too

difficulty; the most difficult activity which is necessary matter to bedone to utterly accomplish the degree your taking up. We heard thisfrom junior college students, the way they pronounced the worddifficult is very intense; you would feel it even youre not the onedoing it, and yes we certainly felt it. Thats the reason why the wordThesis was glued into our mind; we should be ready!

Then suddenly, not expecting we was astonished with what we heardfrom our professor, Mrs. Resa T. Suarez; she said that we are going tohave a Thesis.

Wow! What a word? Thesis? Then immediately, with just only a winkof an eye, the five W questions revolved into our mind: What? When?Where? Why? How?. I thought it is done only by those junior college

students, we are only a freshmen students, then why? How we can? Wedont have any idea about it.(we are wondering).

These were the reactions of mine we are so much surprised with ourprofessors given work. Were kind a nervous and alittle bit excited withit.


19/67

TOOLS OF RESEARCH:The tool used in this study is Statistics because of the

interpretation of the data represented by a graph.Statistics also mean Interpretation.


20/67

INSTRUMENT USED:We used to collect information in our survey using Questionnaires as

an instrument. We used it to supply the necessary informations to

complete this research study. A questionnaire is a list of planned,

written questions related to a particular topic with space provided for

indicating the response to each questions, intended for submission to a

number of persons for reply. It is commonly used as informative survey

studies and in measurement of attitudes and opinions, in other words aQuestionnaire is simply a set of questions, which should be answered

properly by a required number of proper selected respondents.

We used this instrument, due to the fact that it is a commonly used in

behavioral research or social research which are both took by us, the

researchers. We had conducted a questioning method because for all

we know, it is the most effective technique in the survey approach. Wemade the questions more reliable which are structed beforehand. The

sample questions needed for the research problem which is about

proper waste management.


21/67

DESIGN USED:

*descr ipt ive research design

*survey

The survey weve done in our Barangay; we are a group of two

individual who pool our resources and full effort to gather information

on a 90% of the households in Barangay Tayamaan proper with the total

population of 1,254, concerning the given phenomenon which is Proper

Waste Disposal.


22/67

NUMBEROF RESPONDENTSThe total number of respondents from whom we gathered

information about proper waste management in Barangay

Tayamaan(proper) , Mamburao, Occidental Mindoro is about 148

households which is 90% of the total number of households.


23/67

STATISTICALTREATMENTOF DATATo determine Frequency:

F=n

*where F is stand for Frequency

*where n is stand for number of respondents

To determine percentage:

P=F/100

*where P is stand for percentage(%)

*the percentage is the quotient of the Frequency

divide by 100.


24/67

PRESENTATION OF TABLES ANDITS INTERPRETATION ANDANALYSIS OF DATATHROUGH THEUSE OF THE PIE GRAPH


25/67

1.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDHASATOILETINYOURHOUSE?

78.38

%

21.62

%

Percentage

Yes

No

Response Frequency Percentage

Yes 116 78.38%

no 32 21.62%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are 116 households who responded Yes and itspercentage is 78.38% while there are 32 households who

responded no, 21.62% its percentage , consuming 148 total

number of respondents where is equal to 100%.


26/67

2.) HOWMANYTOILETSDOESYOURHOUSEHOLDHAVE?

Percentage

onlyone

morethanone

64.19%

14.19%


only one 95 64.19%

More than

one21 14.19%

Total: 116 78.38%

Interpretation:

There are 95 households responded that there are only one

toilet and its percentage is 64.19%, while there are only 21 households

responded that there are more than one toilet and its percentage is

only 14.19%. The total number of household who have toilet is 116,

where it is equal to 78.38%.


27/67

3.) IFYOURHOUSEHOLDHAVEMORETHANONETOILET,WHATISTHEUSAGEOFYOUROTHERTOILET/S?

Percentagefor visitors and neigbors usage

for personal usage

both

7.43%

4.73%2.03%


For visitors and

neighbors usage 3 2.03%

for personal

usage 7 4.73%

Both 11 7.43%

Total: 21 14.19%

Interpretation:There are only 3 households responded that the usage of their

other toilet/s is for visitors and neighbors only, 2.03% its percentage;

while there are 7 responded that the usage of their other toilet/s is for

personal use only, 4.73% its percentage; there are 11 households

responded both, 7.43% its percentage. The total frequency is 21 and

14.19% its total percentage.


28/67

4.) HOWOFTENDOYOUUSEYOURTOILET/S?

Percentage

always sometimes

5.40%

72.98%


always 108 72.98%

sometimes 8 5.40%

Total: 116 78.38%

Interpretation:There are 108 households responded that they always

use their toilet/s, and its percentage is 72.98%; while there are 8

responded sometimes and its percentage is 5.40%. The total is 116

and the total percentage is 78.38, which is the total percentage of

the respondents who have toile/s.


29/67

5.) HOWOFTENDOYOUCLEANYOURTOILET/S?

Percentage

always sometimes

14.86%

63.52%


Always 94 63.52%

Sometimes 22 14.86%

Total: 116 78.38%

Interpretation:

There are 94 households responded that they alwaysclean their toilet/s, and its percentage is 63.52%; while there are

22 responded sometimes and 14.86% its percentage. 166 the

total frequency and the total percentage is 78.38%.


30/67

6.) IFYOUHAVENOTOILET, HOWYOUWILLDISPOSEOFYOURWASTE?

Percentageby using the neighbor's toilet

by disposing it in any process

by using public toilet

13.51%

8.11%


By using

neighbors toilet12 8.11%

By disposing it inany process

0 0

By using public

toilet20 13.51%

Total: 32 21.62%

Interpretation:There are 12 households who have no toilet

responded that they often use the toilet of their neighbor

which is 8.11%; while there are 20 responded that they use

public toilet which is 13.51%. The total frequency is 32 which

is 21.62 its total percentage.


31/67

7.) WHEREISTHEPUBLICTOILET/SPLACED?

Percentage

along the highway

near from the Brgy. Hall

near from the resedential places

100%


Along the highway 0 0%

Near from the Brgy. Hall 0 0%

Near from the residentialplaces 148 100%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

The public toilets were placed at near from the

residential place, having the total number of respondents which is

148 and total percentage of 100%.


32/67

8.) AREWOMENSTOILETSEPARATEDFROMMENSTOILET?

Percentage

yes no

100%


Yes 0 0%

No 148 100%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

The womens toilet was not separated from mens

toilet.


33/67

9.) WHATISTHEUSAGEOFTHEPUBLICTOILET?

Percentagefor emergency for waste disposal

25.68%

74.32%


For emergency 110 74.32%

For waste disposal

38 25.68%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 110 households responded that the usage of

the public toilet is for emergency which is 74.32% its percentage;

there are 38 responded for waste disposal which is 25.68%,

having the total frequency of 148 and total percentage of 100%.


34/67

10.) HOWMUCHGARBAGEDOESYOURHOUSEHOLDSPRODUCEDAILY (INKILOS)?

Percentage

1 kilograms 2 kilograms

3 kilograms more than 3 kls.

15.54%

35.81%

15.54%

33.11%


1 kls. 23 15.54%

2 kls. 53 35.81%

3 kls. 23 15.54%

More than 3 kls. 49 33.11%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 23 frequency and 15.54 % households

responded that there is only 1 kilogram garbage that their

household produced daily, same result to 3 kilograms of garbage.

There are 53 households produced 2 kilograms of garbage daily

which is 35.81% its percentage; having the total frequency of 148

and the total percentage of 100%.


35/67

11.) WHATISTHENUMBERONEGARBAGETHATYOURHOUSEHOLDPRODUCED?

Percentagepapers plastics leaves bottles/cans

8.11%

35.14%43.24%

13.51%


Papers 12 8.11%

Plastics 52 35.14%

Leaves 64 43.24%

Bottles/cans 20 13.51%Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 12 households responded that paper is the number one

garbage that they produced, which is 8.11% its percentage; there are 52 responded

that plastic is the number one that their household produced, 35.14% its

percentage; 64 responded that leaves is the most producible garbage which is

43.24%; and there are 20 responded that the bottle/can are the number one which is

13.51%; having the total frequency of 148 and total percentage of 100%.


36/67

12.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDPRACTICEGARBAGESEGREGATION?

Percentageyes no

19.60%

80.40%

Respons

e

Frequency Percentage

Yes 119 80.40%

No 29 19.60%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are 119 households responded thattheyre practicing garbage segregation, which is 80.40%;

there are 29 household responded that they not often

practicing garbage segregation, and 19.60% its

percentage; having the total of 148 and the total

percentage of 100%.


37/67

13.) DOESTHEHEADOFHOUSEHOLDTEACHTHEIRCHILDRENABOUTGARBAGESEGREGATION?

Percentage

yes no

30.40%

69.60%


Yes 103 69.60%

no 45 30.40%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are 103 head of households responded that they

teach their children about garbage segregation, which is 69.60%;while there are only 45 households who did not which is 30.40%

of the total percentage of 100% and the total number of

respondents is 148.


38/67

14.) HOWDOYOUDISPOSEOFYOURGARBAGE?

Percentage

dispose it properly

keep it in a space provided

burning it

29.73%

18.92%

51.35%


Dispose it properly 76 51.35%

Keep it in a space 28 18.92%

Burning garbage

44 29.73%Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 76 households responded that they were

disposed their garbage properly, 51.35% its percentage; 44

households said that they were burning their garbage which is

29.73%; and there are 28 households keeping their garbage in a

space, which is 18.92%; the total frequency is 148 and 100% total

percentage.


39/67

15.) DOESTHEIRGARBAGEGETCOLLECTEDBYTHEGARBAGESCOLLECTOR?

Percentage

yes no

100%


Yes 0 0%

no 148 100%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

Therefore, their garbage did not collected by the garbage

collector having the total number of respondents of 148 which is

100%.


40/67

16.) DOYOUCLEANYOURHOUSEDAILY?

Percentage

yes no

100%


Yes 148 100%

no 0 0%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:All the households were clean their house daily having the

total number of respondents of 148 which is 100%.

17 ) DOES YOUR HOUSEHOLD CLEAN YOUR OWN YARD


41/67

17.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDCLEANYOUROWNYARDDAILY?

Pecentage

yes no

8.10%

91.90%


Yes 136 91.90%

no 12 8.10%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are 136 households responded that they

always clean their yard, 91.90% its percentage; there are only 12

households responded that they did not clean their yard daily

which is 8.10% of the total percentage of 100%. The total

number of respondents is 148.

18 ) DOES YOUR HOUSEHOLD CLEAN THE STREET IN FRONT OF


42/67

18.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDCLEANTHESTREETINFRONTOFYOURHOUSE?

Percentage

yes no

6.08%

93.92%


Yes 139 93.92%

No 9 6.08%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 139 households responded that they clean the

street in front of their house which is 93.92%; while there are only

9 out of the total number of responded which is 148 did not clean

the street and 6.08% its percentage of the total percentage which

is 100%.

19 ) D E HE H EH D P P G B GE HE EE ND


43/67

19.) DOESTHEHOUSEHOLDPICKUPGARBAGETHEYSEEANDTHROWITINATRASHCAN?

Percentage

yes no

5.40%

94.60%


Yes 140 94.60%

No 8 5.40%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 140 households responded that they throw

garbage in a trash can they see which is equal to 94.60%; only 8

household responded that they did not pick up garbage which is

5.40%; having the total number of respondents of 148 which is

equal to 100%.


44/67

20.) WHATDOESTHEHOUSEHOLDDOWITHTHEWRAPPERSAFTEREATINGCANDIESORSNACKS?

PercentageThrow it immediately

put in a pocket

look for s trashcan

55.40%

10.14%

34.46%


Throw it

immediately15 10.14%

Put in a

pocket51 34.46%

Look for atrashcan

82 55.40%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 82 households responded that they look for a trashcan

then throw the wrappers after eating candies or snacks, 55.40% its

percentage; there are 51 households responded that they put it in a pocket

which is 34.46%; and only 15 households look for a trashcan before they

throw the wrappers which is 10.14%; having the total number respondents of

148 which is equal to 100%.


45/67

21.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDHASPET/SIN YOURHOUSE?

Percentage

yes no

34.46%

65.54%


Yes 51 34.46%

no 97 65.54%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are only 51 households who have pet/s in theirhouse which is 34.45%; while 97 households without pet in their

house which is 65.54%; the total frequency is 148 which is equal

to 100%.


46/67

22.) AREYOURPET/SLEASHED, CAGEDORRUNNINGFREE?

Percetage

leashed caged running free

4.05%


Leashed 5 3.38%

Caged 6 4.05%

Running free 40 27.03%

Total: 51 34.46%27.03%

3.38%

Interpretation:

There are 40 households responded that their pet/s are

leashed, 3.38% its percentage; 6 households responded that their

pet/s are caged, 4.05% its percentage; and there are 40

households responded that their pet/s are running free which is

27.03% of the total percentage of 34.46%; the total number of

households who have pet/s is 51.


47/67

23.) HOWDOYOUDISPOSEOFTHEPETSWASTE?

Percentge

dispose properly no reponse

15.54%18.92%

Response FrequencyPercentage

Dispose

properly28 18.92%

No respond 23 15.54%

Total: 51 34.46%

Interpretation:

There are 28 households which is 18.92% disposed their

pet/s properly; 23 which is 15.54% households not responding this

statement. The total respondents who have pet/s is 51 which is

34.46%.


48/67

24.) DOESYOURHOUSEHOLDHASPIGGERYORPOULTRYINYOURHOUSE?

Percentageyes no

25.68%


Yes 38 25.68%

No 110 74.32%

Total: 148 100%

74.32%

Interpretation:

There are only 28 households which is 25.68% who have

piggery/poultry in their house; while there are almost 110 and its

percentage is 74.32% households without piggery/poultry in their

house; having the total frequency of 148 which is 100%.


49/67

25.) IFYES HOWDOYOUDISPOSEOFTHEIRWASTE?

Percentage

dispose properly

do not dispose

25.68%


Dispose

properly38 25.68%

Do not

dispose it.0 0%

Total: 38 25.68%

Interpretation:

Therefore, all the respondents who have

piggery/poultry were disposed the waste properly having the

total frequency of 38 which is 25.68%.


50/67

26.) AREYOUAWAREOFTHEPOSSIBLEEFFECTSOFIMPROPERDISPOSALOFALLKINDSOFWASTE?

Percentageyes no

100%


Yes 148 100%

No 0% 0%

total 148 100%

Interpretation:

All the respondents are aware of the possible

effects of improper disposal of all kinds of waste, having the

total number of respondents of 148 which is 100%.

27 ) W


51/67

27.) WHATDOYOUTHINKISTHEBESTTHINGYOUCANDOTOMAKEABARANGAYCLEANER?

Percentagepractice garbage segregation

cleaning the house

teach the childen about wastemanagement

58.11%

23.65% 18.24%


Practice garbage

segregation27 18.24%

Cleaning the house 86 58.11%

Teach the children about

waste management

35 23.65%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:There are 27 households which is 18.24% think that the best

thing they can do to make a barangay cleaner is to practice garbage

segregation; 86 households which is 58.11% the best thing is cleaning

their own houses; 35 households which is 23.65% teach the children

about waste management is the best thing; having 148 total number of

respondents which equal to 100%.

28 ) WHO DO YOU THINK WOULD BE BENEFITED FROM


52/67

28.) WHODOYOUTHINKWOULDBEBENEFITEDFROMPROPERWASTEMANAGEMENT?

Percentage

all the residents none

100%


All the residents of

the barangay148 100%

None 0 0%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

All the respondents know that all the residents of thebarangay would be benefited from waste management having

the total of 148 which is 100%.

29 ) W


53/67

29.) WHATDOYOUTHINKISTHEBENEFITOFPROPERWASTEMANAGEMENT?

20%7%

10%

17%

46%

Percentagesecure health

community beautification

maintain cleanliness

avoid pollution

all of the above


Secure health 30 20%

Community beautification 10 7%

Maintain cleanliness 15 10%

Avoid pollution 25 17%

All of the above 68 46%

Total: 148 100%

Interpretation:

There are 30 households which is 20% responded that securehealth is the benefit of a proper waste management; 10 which is 7%

households responded that community beautification is the benefit; 15

households which is 10% responded that maintain cleanliness is the

benefit; while 25 households which is 17% avoid pollution is a benefit, 68

which is 46% all of the above.


54/67

CHAPTER IVSUMMARYANDFINDINGS

Based on the data gathered from the survey weve done


55/67

Based on the data gathered from the survey we ve done ,

the following were found that:

there are 116 households who responded that they have toilet/s and its percentage

is 78.38% while there are 32 households who responded none, 21.62% its

percentage , consuming 148 total number of respondents where is equal to 100%;

there are 95 households responded that there are only one toilet and its

percentage is 64.19%, while there are only 21 households responded that there are

more than one toilet and its percentage is only 14.19%. The total number of

household who have toilet is 116, where it is equal to 78.38%;

there are only 3 households responded that the usage of their other toilet/s is forvisitors and neighbors only, 2.03% its percentage; while there are 7 responded that

the usage of their other toilet/s is for personal use only, 4.73% its percentage; there

are 11 households responded both, 7.43% its percentage. The total frequency is 21

and 14.19% its total percentage;

there are 108 households responded that they always use their toilet/s, and its

percentage is 72.98%; while there are 8 responded sometimes and its percentageis 5.40%. The total is 116 and the total percentage is 78.38, which is the total

percentage of the respondents who have toile/s;

there are 94 households responded that they always clean their toilet/s, and its

t i 63 52% hil th 22 d d ti d 14 86% it


56/67

percentage is 63.52%; while there are 22 responded sometimes and 14.86% its

percentage. 166 the total frequency and the total percentage is 78.38%;

there are 12 households who have no toilet responded that they often use the toilet

of their neighbor which is 8.11%; while there are 20 responded that they use public

toilet which is 13.51%. The total frequency is 32 which is 21.62 its total percentage;

the public toilets were placed at near from the residential place, having the total

number of respondents;

the womens toilet was not separated from mens toilet;

there are 110 households responded that the usage of the public toilet is for

emergency which is 74.32% its percentage; there are 38 responded for waste

disposal which is 25.68%, having the total frequency of 148 and total percentage of

100%;

there are 23 frequency and 15.54 % households responded that there is only 1kilogram garbage that their household produced daily, same result to 3 kilograms

of garbage. There are 53 households produced 2 kilograms of garbage daily which

is 35.81% its percentage; having the total frequency of 148 and the total

percentage of 100%;

there are 12 households responded that paper is the number one garbage that they


57/67

p p p g g y

produced, which is 8.11% its percentage; there are 52 responded that plastic is the

number one that their household produced, 35.14% its percentage; 64 responded

that leaves is the most producible garbage which is 43.24%; and there are 20

responded that the bottle/can are the number one which is 13.51%; having the total

frequency of 148 and total percentage of 100%;

there are 119 households responded that theyre practicing garbage segregation,

which is 80.40%; there are 29 household responded that they not often practicing

garbage segregation, and 19.60% its percentage; having the total of 148 and the

total percentage of 100%;

there are 103 head of households responded that they teach their children aboutgarbage segregation, which is 69.60%; while there are only 45 households who did

not which is 30.40% of the total percentage of 100% and the total number of

respondents is 148;

There are 76 households responded that they were disposed their garbage

properly, 51.35% its percentage; 44 households said that they were burning their

garbage which is 29.73%; and there are 28 households keeping their garbage in aspace, which is 18.92%; the total frequency is 148 and 100% total percentage.

therefore, their garbage did not collected by the garbage collector having the total


58/67

therefore, their garbage did not collected by the garbage collector having the totalnumber of respondents of 148 which is 100%;

all the households were clean their house daily having the total number of respondentsof 148 which is 100%;

there are 136 households responded that they always clean their yard, 91.90% itspercentage; there are only 12 households responded that they did not clean their yarddaily which is 8.10% of the total percentage of 100%. The total number of respondents is148;

there are 139 households responded that they clean the street in front of their housewhich is 93.92%; while there are only 9 out of the total number of responded which is148 did not clean the street and 6.08% its percentage of the total percentage which is100%;

there are 140 households responded that they throw garbage in a trash can they seewhich is equal to 94.60%; only 8 household responded that they did not pick up garbagewhich is 5.40%; having the total number of respondents of 148 which is equal to 100%;

there are 82 households responded that they look for a trashcan then throw thewrappers after eating candies or snacks, 55.40% its percentage; there are 51 householdsresponded that they put it in a pocket which is 34.46%; and only 15 households look fora trashcan before they throw the wrappers which is 10.14%; having the total numberrespondents of 148 which is equal to 100%;

there are only 51 households who have pet/s in their house which is 34.45%; while


59/67

97 households without pet in their house which is 65.54%; the total frequency is

148 which is equal to 100%;

there are 40 households responded that their pet/s are leashed, 3.38% its

percentage; 6 households responded that their pet/s are caged, 4.05% its

percentage; and there are 40 households responded that their pet/s are running

free which is 27.03% of the total percentage of 34.46%; the total number of

households who have pet/s is 51;

there are 28 households which is 18.92% disposed their pet/s properly; 23 which

is 15.54% households not responding this statement. The total respondents who

have pet/s is 51 which is 34.46%;

there are only 28 households which is 25.68% who have piggery/poultry in their

house; while there are almost 110 and its percentage is 74.32% households without

piggery/poultry in their house; having the total frequency of 148 which is 100%;

therefore, all the respondents who have piggery/poultry were disposed the wasteproperly having the total frequency of 38 which is 25.68%;

all the respondents are aware of the possible effects of improper disposal of all


60/67

all the respondents are aware of the possible effects of improper disposal of all

kinds of waste, having the total number of respondents of 148 which is 100%;

there are 27 households which is 18.24% think that the best thing they can do to

make a barangay cleaner is to practice garbage segregation; 86 households whichis 58.11% the best thing is cleaning their own houses; 35 households which is

23.65% teach the children about waste management is the best thing; having 148

total number of respondents which equal to 100%;

all the respondents know that all the residents of the barangay would be benefited

from waste management having the total of 148 which is 100%; and

there are 30 households which is 20% responded that secure health is the benefit

of a proper waste management; 10 which is 7% households responded that

community beautification is the benefit; 15 households which is 10% responded

that maintain cleanliness is the benefit; while 25 households which is 17% avoid

pollution is a benefit, 68 which is 46% all of the above.


61/67

CHAPTER VSUGGESTION /RECOMMENDATIONANDCONCLUSION


62/67

SUGGESTION / RECOMMENDATIONBased on the findings, it was further recommended that every

barangay government should conceptualized an advocation focusing on

the waste products produced by the activities done by its people and

from its people also. In some ways Barangay officials of Barangay

Tayamaan should have proper implementation of policies concerning

the proper way of disposing waste products. Multa sa Bawat MalingPatatapon ng Basura strictly and effectively is a project which is

further suggested. Barangay officials should do their maneuver in

encouraging their people to practice garbage segregation as well as

disposing it. It was also further recommended that SK Members

especially the SK Chairman should assemble the youths vigilance on

their community and fellowmen. Projects such as placing trash cans

with labels-Biodegradable, Non-biodegradable and recyclable in eachsideways in their Barangay; Oplans-Linis with youth participation or

youth participants and placing posts showing proper waste disposal are

further suggested.

Based on the tally results most of the households interviewed


63/67

Based on the tally results most of the households interviewed

said and answered that Barangay Tayamaan has public toilets but

womens are not separate from mens toilet, ergo, a further

recommendation is accounted that it is better to have separate public

toilets for different gender for safety and for the better. As an addition

Barangay Officials should visit this public toilets even once a week forthe assurance, that it is a properly used and cared by the resident when

using it. Residence should invoke to the Barangay Government or on

the Municipal Government for Garbage Collectors for the collection of

garbage's of every household, for them to avoid burning it to minimize

Global warming, of course.

it was also further recommended that households in the focusedBarangay should continue the maintenance of cleaning their toilets

always. The head of households also continue inducing their children to

the practice of right manner of disposing wastes. It was found out also

that most of the households practice garbage segregation but they

should still be responsible in the proper disposal of the segregated

garbage's. This is not a knotty matter if only people would make the

initiative act.

It was highly further recommended that this kind of research


64/67

should be done also by some other Barangay in any other Municipality

for the know-how, satisfaction cleanliness and progress of all.


65/67

CONCLUSIONIt was therefore concluded, that proper waste management has

become ambiguous; which are the act of just throwing waste in a

garbage can or any garbage place, and the other one is the manner of

disposing, monitoring, collecting, transporting, managing and

processing garbage in any appropriate way. It was ergo concluded, that

waste management can be done by such ways like proper segregation

whether it is Biodegradable or Non-biodegradable and recyclable. The

right manner of practicing waste disposal render possible effects; we,as a human, would be vested with a safe and healthy life and a

wonderful community free from perilous diseases and illness; the

community itself for having an eco-friendly environment and satisfied

residents. The animals with tier existence would feel really at home in

an environment plenty and fresh air; and also the most important

beneficiary, the next generation for the assurance of having safe, cleanand green environment, as an addition would taste the real essence of

existence; living in an environment free from danger of early death

(because of disease), cause of pollution in the coming years as what

theyre longing for.

It was also concluded that making our own simple ways showing


66/67

the proper manner of waste disposal would give invaluable change for

the whole, every single persons simple moves about the matter are the

most accounted for a stunning community. It was further concluded that

cleaning are own house is a highly recommended way to make every

society cleaner, for the reason that cleanliness should start from

yourself, from your own home, it would reflect who you are and your

Barangay. It was determined and further concluded that every

community has the potential to acquire a healthy and clean environment

as well as its residents, every Barangay is considered eco-friendly, if it

has what it takes to be safe and green environment, discipline people

are those who are responsible especially in their communitys

cleanliness.A further conclusion should be bear, that Global community

development as well as its cleanliness always starts in the smallest unit

of society (household) with their weapon of Proper Waste Management.

Republic of the Philippines

P l t h i U i it f th Phili i


67/67

Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Sablayan Campus

PROPER WASTE MANAGEMENT

A Thesis Presented

to:

Professor Resa T. Suarez

Professor in Writing in the Discipline

In Partial Fulfillment of a Final Examination

by:

Daryll Boy V. Zubiri

and

Brendalyn U. Ruben

Coop 1-4

Proper Waste Management(Pjo.) Daryll

Documents

Transcript of Proper Waste Management(Pjo.) Daryll