Promoting the Success of a New Academic Librarian Through a Formal Mentoring Program The State...
-
Upload
osborn-wilkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Promoting the Success of a New Academic Librarian Through a Formal Mentoring Program The State...
Promoting the Success of a New Academic Librarian Through a Formal
Mentoring Program
The State University of West Georgia Experience
By Brian Kooy and Allyson Davis
2
Our definition of mentoring
Mentoring is a cooperative and nurturing
relationship where one person (the mentor)
invests time, know-how, and effort in enhancing
another person’s professional growth,
knowledge, and skills, in ways that prepare the
Individual for greater productivity or
achievement in the future.
3
Developing the program
Structure of the program Factors in the selection of a mentor Who should participate in the program Length of the program Roles of the participants Documentation and assessment of the
program
4
Informal programs
Less structured Provide greater flexibility Allow participants to “find” each other Allow for a more casual relationship Have the potential to be less time consuming Allow mentoring to “just happen”
5
Formal programs
Are more structured Have a beginning and an end Have a method of no-fault termination Establish measurable goals and outcomes Develop a timeline to meet agreed upon
goals Document Progress Develop a system to appraise the program
6
Factors in the selection of a mentor
Potential mentors should be identified All new librarians should be highly encouraged to
participate New “experienced” librarians should be given the
opportunity to participate Protégés should have the opportunity to seek a
mentor on their own After a mentor is chosen, the mentor, protégé, and
department head should meet
7
What makes a good mentor?
Supportive Patient People-Oriented A Good Motivator Respectful of Others An Effective Teacher A Good listener Self-Confident
8
A good mentor also needs
Desire Time Nurturing personality, but able to provide a
reality check The ability to develop an individual career
development plan
9
Length of the relationship
Long enough for protégé to grow Reasonable duration with clearly stated
expectations Ultimately – length depends on the needs of
your institution and participants
11
Role of the mentor, cont.
Provide practical answers Serve as a link to the Library faculty and staff Smooth the way Be a source of suggestions, advice, and
information Offer insights about professional
experiences.
12
Responsibility of the protégé
Be willing to learn Accept constructive feedback Identify short term and long range career
goals and accept that those goals may change
Provide open and honest communication and feedback to mentor
13
Participate in mentoring process
Do the appropriate “homework” for meetings Work to gain the skills, knowledge, and
abilities to grow Be flexible in considering new options and
way to approach a situation or task Take initiative to seek advice from mentor
when needed
14
Purpose of mentoring
Explain how the organization works Identify perceived strengths and develop a plan to
eliminate perceived deficiencies Share critical knowledge that would directly impact
the successful completion of my job responsibilities Help build self-confidence Offer encouragement Increase the likelihood for retention and tenure.
15
Building the relationship
Establishing a protected time when meetings will be held
Establishing where meetings will be held Creating a connection – getting to know each
other Agreeing to confidentiality
16
Building the relationship, cont.
Fostering an open dialogue Ensuring the mentor offers support, “not”
criticism Nurturing self-sufficiency Encourage problem solving
17
Individual goals of the protégé
Specific Directly related to the protégé’s job
responsibilities Measurable Able to be accomplished within a specified
time period.
18
A few examples of goals
Performance criteria (job description) Library policies and procedures Liaison duties Merit pay evaluation procedures Tenure / Promotion guidelines Teaching responsibilities Reference desk responsibilities Professional development
19
Continue the partnership
Working toward the completion of goals. Filling in the gaps Building self-esteem Evaluating each meeting
20
Documenting the process
Keep records Put goals in writing Fill out progress reports at intervals Include accounting of expenses Include narrative of program’s successes or
failures
21
Have a periodic checkup
Review progress Review the Individual Career Development
Plan Ask questions
22
Benefits of mentoring
Personal support Psychological Support Confidence Building Valuable direction Gaps filled in Make Aware of Professional Development
Opportunities
24
Is a mentoring program right for you? Consider these facts:
RETIREMENT: Based on 1990 Census data, almost 58 percent of
professional librarians will reach the age of 65 between 2005 and 2019.
In 1998, 57 percent of professional librarians were age 45 or older (July 2000 Monthly Labor Review).
Based on a 2000 survey published by Library Journal, 40 percent of library directors said they would retire in nine years or less.
25
Is a mentoring program right for you? Consider these facts:
LIBRARY SCHOOLS AND GRADUATES: As of December 2000, there were 58
graduate programs in library and information studies in the United States and Canada accredited by the American Library Association.
Every year since 1990, more than 4,000 persons received their master's degree from these programs.
26
Advice on starting a program
Design the program so that it fits the culture of your organization.
Start early Establish and set clear goals Communicate the program’s goals to all
participants Enlist the cooperation of the entire
organization, including the administration.
27
Advice on starting a program
Develop a selection process for the mentor/protégé Be assured of the commitment of the
mentors/protégé Give freedom (within established guidelines) to the
mentor/protégé to assess and develop objectives based on the individual needs of the protégé.
Permit withdrawal from the program Give the program a long-term test period Evaluate the program continually