Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project...

9
Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th , 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath, International Consultant

Transcript of Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project...

Page 1: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Project situation analysis and technical reporting

UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3rd Project Steering Committee, March 13th, 2012, Tehran, IranPeter Herkenrath, International Consultant

Page 2: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Contents

1. The outputs of the project2. Status of delivery of outputs3. Some conclusions4. Next steps for outputs

13 March, 2012

2Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 3: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

The project outputs

International Consultant: Global situation analysis – reporting

requirements (output 1.1)Pilot countries: National analysis study (output 1.2) National manual (output 1.3) Recommendations for improved information

management and national reporting (outputs 2.1 and 2.2)

Needs analysis: training and technology (output 2.3)

Report on the quality of reporting (output 2.4)

13 March, 2012

3Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 4: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Testing the joint reporting format: additional outputs (added to output 1.3/ national manual)

International Consultant: Assessment of options for joint reporting Draft joint reporting format for the three

Rio ConventionsPilot countries: Completed report using the draft joint

reporting format Questionnaire on experience with testing

the draft joint reporting format

13 March, 2012

4Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 5: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Status of output delivery

• National situation analysis: done by all countries (one country: draft only)• National manual for integrated reporting: 5 countries: 1st/2nd draft (final: end of project)• Recommendations for improved information management and national reporting and the needs analysis for training and technology: 3 countries• Testing the joint reporting format: all countries have expressed their willingness to do so

13 March, 2012

5Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 6: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Preliminary conclusions from outputs• Approaches to reporting vary between countries• Key priorities: collaboration between focal points/ agencies in charge of different conventions• management of national environmental data & information required for reporting• Workshops & consultations have brought stakeholders together• Improved communication between stakeholders• Key personnel has been trained

13 March, 2012

6Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 7: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Next steps for outputs: pilot countries

• Completed joint reporting format (output 1.3): 30th April• Completed questionnaire on experiences with joint reporting format (output 1.3): 30th April•Outstanding outputs : 30th June (relevant pilot countries)• Final version of national manual (output 1.3): 30th September• Report on quality of national reports (output 2.4): 30th September

13 March, 2012

7Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 8: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Next steps for outputs: International consultant

• Report on pilot country experiences with joint reporting format (output 1.3): 31st May• Report on pilot country project experience (output 2.4): 31st October

13 March, 2012

8Project situation analysis and technical reporting

Page 9: Project situation analysis and technical reporting UNEP/GEF FNR_Rio project – 3 rd Project Steering Committee, March 13 th, 2012, Tehran, Iran Peter Herkenrath,

Key outcome: Improved systems of reporting to the Rio Conventions• Improved collaboration of focal points, agencies and stakeholders across the three conventions• Improved management of national environmental data & information• Improved reporting rate for Rio Conventions• National manual capturing the project experience, recommendations and improvements

13 March, 2012

9Project situation analysis and technical reporting