Progress and achievements in kharif grain Sorghum Breeding ... · CV (%) 16.8. 14.3: 3.26. 2.36:...

Progress and achievements in kharif grain Sorghum Breeding: 2016-17

Aruna C.IIMR, Hyderabad

Trial No. Multi-location 4

Collaborative experiments

3

TeamZone I (N&S): Bhilwara, Bapatla, Deesa, Diggitonk, Udaipur, Coimbatore, Kovilpatti, Palem (8)

Zone II: Akola, Aurangabad, Buldhana, Chamarajnagar, Dharwad, Indore, Mangrol, Parbhani, Somnathpur, Surat, Yavatmal, Ajeet seeds, Devgen, Hytech seeds (14)

Major Recommendations & action taken-Agm16

Recommendation Action takenPlot size should be uniform across locations

Most of the centres have followed the recommended plot size

Testing centers should report plant population correctly at the time of thinning and time of harvest.

All the centres have given the plant population data and the data from the centres with low plant population was not included in the analysis.

F2 populations developed at IIMR will be shared with the centers

69 F2 populations were shared with 6 centres- Chamarajnagar (15), Indore (8), Udaipur (8), Diggitonk (15), Bapatla (15), Deesa (8) for making appropriate selections

Efforts to continue on sorghum breeding for red grain

Efforts on red sorghum is being taken up at IIMR and Akola

Kharif Sorghum Breeding AGM 17 25/4/17

Progress report

• Multi-location AICSIP trials

• Coordinated sorghum breeding research

• Publications


Multi-location AICSIP yield trials

Kharif trials

• Advanced Hybrid Trial (AHT: 11 entries at 28 locations –21 reported)

• Advanced Varietal Trial (AVT: 19 entries at 21 locations –16 reported)

• Initial Hybrid Trial (IHT: 14 entries at 11 locations – 10 reported)

• Initial Variety Trial (IVT: 25 entries at 11 locations – 10 reported)

Efficiency of trial execution: 83.3%


Performance of hybrids in AHT Zone I5673 5585

52945102

4919 4754

3426

128

111.3

137.4

123.5

108.3113.6

120.4

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

SPH 1778 SPH 1820 SPH 1816 SPH 1779 SPH 1817 CSH 16 CSH 30

GY (kg/ha)

DFY (q/ha)

Entries- 7 (3+4) Checks- 4Locations-7

SPH 1778 and SPH 1820 were promising with >15% increase in grain yield over the checks

SPH 1779 is early with >20% increase in GY over early check, CSH 30


Performance of hybrids in AHT Zone II3953 3911 3896

3742 3681

3780 3241128

126136

118

147142

118

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

SPH 1778 SPH 1820 SPH 1779 SPH 1817 SPH 1813 CSH 25 CSH 30

GY (kg/ha)

DFY (q/ha)

Entries- 7 (3+4) Checks- 4Locations-14

SPH 1778 and SPH 1820 were promising with >5% increase in grain yield over the check

SPH 1779 and SPH 1817 are early with >15% in GY over early check, CSH 30 SPH 1813 recorded better level of resistance to grain molds (3.3 GMS vs 3.8

in CSH 25)

Hybrids evaluated over 3 years- SPH 1778

• Zone I- 7% increase in grain yield and 14% increase in dry fodder yield over CSH 30

• Zone II- 10.5% increase in grain yield and 6% increase in dry fodder yield over CSH 25

Performance of SPH 1778 over 3 years

020406080

100120140

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPH 1778

CSH 30

0100020003000400050006000

2014 2015 2016 Av

GY (kg/ha) DFY (q/ha)

0

50

100

150

200

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPH 1778

CSH 25

0100020003000400050006000

2014 2015 2016 Av



Hybrids evaluated over 3 years- SPH 1779

• Hybrid based on A2 cytoplasm

• Zone I- 6% increase in grain yield and 20% increase in dry fodder yield over CSH 30

• Zone II- 7% increase in grain yield and on par for dry fodder yield over CSH 25

Performance of SPH 1779 over 3 years

0

50

100

150

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPH 1779

CSH 30

0100020003000400050006000

2014 2015 2016 Av


0

50

100

150

200

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPH 1779

CSH 25

0100020003000400050006000

2014 2015 2016 Av



Performance of varieties in AVT- Zone I[VALUE]*

30862889 2786 4919 2702 2659 2596

2468 2374

1527

128

111116

123 125119 123

110

81.574.7

131

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

SPV 2301

SPV 2358

SPV 2362

SPV 2363

SPV 2296

SPV 2366

SPV 2364

SPV 2293

SPV 2370

CSV 17 CSV 23

GY (kg/ha)

DFY (q/ha)

Entries- 14(4+10) Checks- 5Locations-5

SPV 2301 had significant improvement for GY over the check, CSV 17 SPV 2358, SPV 2362, SPV 2363, SPV 2296, SPV 2366, SPV 2364 recorded >10%

increase in GY over CSV 17 SPV 2358 and SPV 2366 are early SPV 2366, SPV 2372, SPV 2373, SPV 2307 had bold seed (>3g/100 seed)

Performance of varieties in AVT Zone II3674 3653

3474

3362 4919

3237

3422

128

135

128

126125

133

132

118

120

122

124

126

128

130

132

134

136

138

3000

3100

3200

3300

3400

3500

3600

3700

3800

SPV 2357 SPV 2307 SPV 2293 SPV 2385 SPV 2308 SPV 2364 CSV 20

GY (kg/ha)

DFY (q/ha)

SPV 2357 and SPV 2307 recorded 7% increase in grain yield over the check

SPV 2307 and SPV 2366 had bold seed (>3.0 g/100 seeds) SPV 2307 had better level of resistance to GM and SF

Entries- 14(4+10) Checks- 5Locations-9


Varieties evaluated over 3 years- Zone I

• SPV 2293 and SPV 2296 were promising over 3 years

• SPV 2293- 11% increase in grain yield and on par for dry fodder yield over CSV 20


Performance of SPV 2293

0

50

100

150

200

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPV 2293

CSV 20

0500

100015002000250030003500

2014 2015 2016 Av


0

50

100

150

200

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPV 2296

CSV 20

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

2014 2015 2016 AvGY (kg/ha) DFY (q/ha)


Varieties evaluated over 3 years- Zone II

• SPV 2307 and SPV 2293 were promising over 3 years




120125130135140145150

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPV 2307

CSV 20

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

2014 2015 2016 Av


110

120

130

140

150

160

2014 2015 2016 Av

SPV 2293

CSV 20

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

2014 2015 2016 AvGY (kg/ha) DFY (q/ha)



Performance of Hybrids in IHT- Zone I

The check, CSH 30 is ranking first SPH 1846 and SPH 1850 were early and yielding on par with CSH 30

36703427

2718

3308

3655

2287

32303454 3532

2823

3724 3725

113105

133

119124

111

96

125 121 118

134

106

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

SPH 1846

SPH 1847

SPH 1848

SPH 1849

SPH 1850

SPH 1851

SPH 1852

SPH 1853

SPH 1854

SPH 1855

CSH 25 CSH 30

Grain Yield (kg/ha) Fodder Yield (q/ha)

Entries- 10 Checks- 4Locations-4


Performance of Hybrids in IHT- Zone II

• SPH 1846 recorded more GY over the check, CSH 25• For fodder yield, SPH 1855 was slightly better than CSH 25

3816

33313084

3701

30282785

3604 3559 3438 3344

37023388129

111

125131 133

121112

117126

138 135

114

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

SPH 1846

SPH 1847

SPH 1848

SPH 1849

SPH 1850

SPH 1851

SPH 1852

SPH 1853

SPH 1854

SPH 1855

CSH 25 CSH 30

Grain Yield (kg/ha) Fodder Yield (q/ha)

Entries- 10 Checks- 4Locations-6


Performance of varieties in IVT

Genotype GY (kg/ha) % > over check DFY (q/ha) % > over check

SPV 2438 3368 7.4 164 3.65

SPV 2424 3298 5.2 159 0.66

SPV 2437 3289 4.9 160 1.35

CSV 20 3136 - 158 -

Cd 5% 1295 39.0

Genotype GFY (q/ha) % > over check DFY (q/ha) % > over check

SPV 2423 4027 14.4 138 -

SPV 2433 3717 5.7 144 2.4

SPV 2438 3680 4.6 142 0.6

SPV 2436 3652 3.8 150 6.9

CSV 20 3519 - 141 -

Cd 5% 1741 - 44.0 -

Zone I

Zone II

Entries- 21 Checks- 5Locations-4&6


Inter-institutional hybrid program

Kharif sorghum

Sl. No. Hybrid GY FY DTF DTM PH GW1 CMS 15-4 A x AKR 529 4206 127.6 71 111 218 2.882 IMS34A x 841 4028 128.2 77 117 218 2.863 CMS15-1A x AKR530 3983 124.2 75 115 197 2.414 IMS15A x I26 3969 121.2 76 117 202 2.625 IMS34A x I26 3852 128.3 76 116 206 2.666 IMS15A x KR125 3837 124.0 74 114 222 2.727 IIMR3003A x AKR456 3877 119.5 72 107 151 2.788 CSH 25 4398 120.8 74 114 202 2.819 CSH 30 3432 108.5 65 105 179 2.6510 General Mean 3666 120.0 73 113 203 2.81

CD(5%) 647 16.6 2.5 2.58 20.6 0.24CV (%) 16.8 14.3 3.26 2.36 7.92 11.3

GY: grain yield (kg/ha), FY: Fodder yield (q/ha), DTM: days to maturity; PH: plant height (cm), GW: 100 grain weight (g)

New MS lines shared : 9 from 4 centersNew test hybrids developed : 21 hybrids developed


Inter-institutional breeding program- contd..

Publications from the group• Journal publications- 40• Conference papers- 21• Popular articles- 11

Centre No. of F2populations

No. of selections made

Main selection criteria

Udaipur 8 163 Compact panicle with bold grain

Akola 15 220 Higher Grain yield, better grain qualities including grain shape, grain luster, grain boldness, earliness, with higher no. of primaries and secondaries

Diggitonk 15 186 Earliness, compact panicle

Indore 8 156 Yield and grain quality

Deesa 8 34 Dual purpose types with compact panicle


Future plans

Utilization of unused germplasm for creating genetic diversity

Population breeding derivatives will be evaluated for grain mold resistance and related traits to identify stable lines

Inter-institutional hybrid trial with early hybrids

The segregating lines from the shared F2s will be advanced a generation at different centres

Multi-location trials


Progress and achievements in kharif grain Sorghum Breeding ... · CV (%) 16.8. 14.3: 3.26. 2.36:...

Documents

Transcript of Progress and achievements in kharif grain Sorghum Breeding ... · CV (%) 16.8. 14.3: 3.26. 2.36:...