Professor Jack Rieley, UNINOT Alternative Approaches to Sustainable Development of Peatland in...
-
Upload
martina-french -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Professor Jack Rieley, UNINOT Alternative Approaches to Sustainable Development of Peatland in...
Professor Jack Rieley, UNINOT
Alternative Approaches to Sustainable Development
of Peatland in Borneo
EU INCO-DEV STRAPEAT PROJECT
STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF
PEATLAND IN BORNEO
Bio-rights
GREATER SEBANGAU CATCHMENTS KALTENG
Palangka Raya
Sg. Sebangau
Mega Rice Project
Banjarmasin
Natural Laboratory
Sg. Katingan
Sg. Kahaya
n
Sg. Kapuas
Sg. Barito
Bio-rights
PARADIGM 1: TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF PEATLAND
IN KALTENGPropelling forces: population, poverty,
food, trade
Underlying forces: politics, profit,
corruptionMain consequences:
failed projects, increased poverty, racial tension, low investment, environmental
degradation, increased fire risk
Indonesian promoters: National and Provincial Governments
Main funders: International aid
agencies and banks
Main reasons: lack of knowledge, management
and monitoring; agriculture/forestry no longer
engines of development
Overall: much money
spent for little lasting return
Overlooked: Aspirations have changed
Bio-rights
PARADIGM 2: TRADITIONAL CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Propelling forces: NGOs, international conventions,
scientists, individuals
Underlying forces: international conservationists; developed countries; funding
agencies; Planet Earth
Main consequences: National Parks; minimum
convention obligations; resource degradation
Main reasons: lack of commitment, knowledge,
money; land reserved for traditional development; lack of public support
Indonesian promoters: ministries with international convention obligations; NGOs
Main funders: Government; aid
agencies and banks; NGOs;
developed country
governments Overall: Biodiversity and natural resource functions loss; increased fire, poverty, racial tension
Bio-rights
PARADIGM 3: SUSTAINABLE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT - A NEW APPROACH!
Propelling forces: conventions, funders, NGOs and scientists; national,
provincial and local governments
Underlying forces: poverty alleviation; sustainability of natural resources, socio-economic
fabric; cultural identity and land rights of indigenous people
Main consequences: local decision making and management; most money remains in Central Kalimantan; poverty reduced and
incomes guaranteed; environment protected
Main reasons: bottom up and top down approach; stakeholder directed; accountability and transparency
Promoters: Ministries; Provincial and Local Government; local communities; NGOs; scientists
Funders: aid agencies and
banks; funding NGOs;
national, provincial and
local governments;
developed countries
Bio-rights
OPTIMIZATION APPROACH: GREATER SEBANGAU CATCHMENT
CENTRAL KALIMANTAN
Stakeholders: ministries, provincial and local
governments, local people, logging concessionaires, scientists, NGOs, orang
utanCurrent land use: forestry, agriculture,
transmigration
Proposed land use: sustainable conservation
and development
Implementing and managing agency: foundation operating as a business, receiving
income, managing natural resources (biodiversity, carbon store and spending surplus for benefit of
local people and local/national government
Income: investors
purchasing carbon
credits and bio-rights
Urgent requirements: new structure plan; foundation with strong links to government and international advisors
Bio-rights
STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF PEATLAND IN
CENTRAL KALIMANTAN
WATER BIODIVERSITY CARBON SOCIO-ECONOMICS
Control Forest quality
Mitigation Sustainable developme
nt
Manage-ment
Bio-rights Carbon credits
Green energy
Expertise Trading Trading Energy policy
Bio-rights
ROLE OF BIO-RIGHTS IN SUSTAINABLE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PEATLAND
IN KALTENG
Indonesian Government Agencies and Ministries
Bio-rights managers
CIMTROP
Kalteng Provincial and local government
Local communitie
s
Greater Sebangau
Foundation
Bio-rights Funders
International scientists/advis
ers
Business ventures
Bio-rights:PEAT SWAMP
FOREST
Bio-rights
The losers without bio-rights?
Bio-rights
POTENTIAL BENEFICIARIES:
•Contributors
•Governments
•Local communities
•Wildlife conservationists
•Global and regional environments
•Biodiversity and natural resource functions
Thank you for listening
Bio-rights