Principals’ Meeting

19
Stan Rounds, Superintendent December 10, 2013 Principals’ Meeting

description

Principals’ Meeting. Stan Rounds, Superintendent December 10, 2013. The goal 85-5-16 What is working and what isn’t? ( R eviewing initial EPSS goals and charting progress prior to PED review in January 2014) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Principals’ Meeting

Page 1: Principals’ Meeting

Stan Rounds, Superintendent December 10, 2013

Principals’ Meeting

Page 2: Principals’ Meeting

Thank you for your work and dedication this first semester

*The goal 85-5-16*What is working and what

isn’t? (Reviewing initial EPSS goals and charting progress prior to PED review in January 2014)*Teacher Evaluation –

providing leadership at the school level to insure that teachers understand the new system*Data/PLC meetings – are

they focused on the learning needs of our students?

Two weeks to the Winter holiday – please ensure that instructional time is maximized until the last day of school.

Passage of the bond issue – schedule time for discussion during your SAC meeting

Thank you for attendance at the District Advisory Committee

January 7, 2014 professional development day schedule emailed to you last week – please contact Dr. Sanchez with questions

Page 3: Principals’ Meeting

Procedural GuidanceK-5 Report Card

Page 4: Principals’ Meeting

Before You Generate Report Cards…

*Grade books must be set up correctly*Assignments must be created correctly*Assignments must be correlated to subject and domain*Grades should be entered for the following subject:*English Language Arts (to include all domains)*Math (to include all domains)*Science *Social Studies*Specials*Life skills

**If you need assistance with any of these then use the resources on the next slides.

Page 6: Principals’ Meeting

Now You Are Ready to Proceed…*If teachers didn’t attend one of the six offered trainings by the Information Operations Department then follow the directions on the PDF, “ How to Generate a Report Card.”

*(This PDF will be available on Dec. 16th 2013 on the following web page)*http://lcps.k12.nm.us/departments/finance/information-

operations/

Page 7: Principals’ Meeting

Assistance with 3-5 Grade Book Setup*http://lcps.k12.nm.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Gen

erating-Progress-Reports-for-3-5-Grades.pdf

*Or call 527-4357

Page 8: Principals’ Meeting

Important Information *The generated report card is only one page.*Send home the one page report card in the report card envelope that

was sent to your school.

*DO NOT SEND HOME DISCOVERY REPORTS*Reserve all Discovery reports for parent/teacher conferences. Do not

give them to parents during report card or progress report distribution. *Specials Teachers MUST have grades in the grade book by Dec. 20th. *The Report Card window is Dec. 18th – Jan. 8th *Homeroom teachers need to verify that the correct report card is

selected for their students before the Report card window opens (if teachers fail to do this, it will cause grades to be lost for Specials teachers).

Page 9: Principals’ Meeting

Assessment RequirementsLegal Requirements and & Potential Consequences for Non-participation

*Federal and state laws require all students to participate in state accountability assessments (ESEA: HR1, Title 1, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 1111, (b), 3, C and Section 22-2C-$ NMSA 1978)*While these laws do not offer an exemption or right of refusal a parent may refuse but must notify the Office of Assessment, Accountability, & Research and sign appropriate document

Page 10: Principals’ Meeting

*School must meet 95% participation or grade drops one letter*School submits test as parent refusal but the data counts

in grade

SCHOOL CONSEQUENCES

Page 11: Principals’ Meeting

STUDENT CONSEQUENCES

*Students must exhaust all SBA/HSGA opportunities to pass reading, math, & science before they can initiate an alternate demonstration of competency in these three areas*Writing and Social Studies competency is

demonstrated through End of Course Exams first then through an alternate means*If students do not demonstrate competency in one or

more of the core areas they will not receive a NM Diploma of Excellence

Page 12: Principals’ Meeting

Class of 2014 Graduation RequirementsCredit Requirements Assessment Requirements Alternate

Demonstrations29 credits Demonstration of

Competency in these areas:

If students don’t meet the initial demonstration, one of these can be employed:

4 English Reading (NMSBA) EOC/CCR 4 Math Mathematics (NMSBA) EOC/CCR 3 Science (2 lab) Science (NMSBA) EOC/CCR/Lab

Science class* 3.5 Social Studies Social Studies (End of

Course) CCR

1 Physical Education

Writing (End of Course) CCR

1 Career Cluster 12.5 Electives (1 of the above must be

Advanced Placement, Dual Credit, or Distance Learning)

Passing Scores:2273 composite in Reading/Math1138 in Science26 U.S. History EOC15 Writing EOC

EOC-End of Course examCCR-College and Career Readiness Indicators (AP exam, SAT, ACT, PSAT, ACCUPLACER, Compass, PLAN, IB)*Class of 2014 only

Page 13: Principals’ Meeting

*Class of 2014 Parent Notification Timeline

Deadline Date Action

November 22 High School counselor meetings with Secondary Instruction and Assessment, Accountability and Research

December 6Counselors complete a credit and assessment analysis for all Seniors 

December 13 Each school compiles a list of students who are missing a graduation requirement (credit and/or assessment)

December 20Notification of parents & students of missing graduation requirements(Letter and face-to-face or phone conference)

January 17 Finalized list of students missing graduation requirements (minus students who passed SBA and EOC re-takes)

Class of 2014 Notification Timeline

Page 14: Principals’ Meeting
Page 15: Principals’ Meeting

Spring 2014

*Students will be offered additional tutoring and review sessions to prepare for required assessments*District-wide and school specific sessions will be

offered based on need*Parents and students will be advised of these

opportunities

Page 16: Principals’ Meeting

Maintenance Program Spanish speaking students with an ACCESS score below

5.0 must be enrolled in Spanish Language Arts. Spanish Language Arts must be taught by a Bilingually Endorsed teacher, *Level 300 teachers must have a MCNL and Bilingual Endorsement

Spanish speaking students with an ACCESS score below 5.0 should be enrolled in either ESL or ELA - Taught by a TESOL Endorsed teacher

Read 180 does not replace ESL or Spanish Language Arts

* Speakers of other languages should be enrolled in either ELA, or ESL by a TESOL endorsed teacher but are NOT participating in a Maintenance Program.

ELL Secondary Scheduling

Page 17: Principals’ Meeting

Dual Language Spanish speaking students with an ACCESS score below

5.0 must be enrolled in Spanish Language Arts and ESL. Spanish Language Arts must be taught by a Bilingually Endorsed teacher, *Level 300 teachers must have a MCNL and Bilingual Endorsement

Speakers of other languages with an ACCESS score below 5.0 should be enrolled in ESL - Taught by TESOL Endorsed teacher

Students are scheduled into a core content area course taught in Spanish – Teacher must have Bilingual Endorsement and highly-qualified in the content area

Read 180 does not replace ESL or Spanish Language Arts

ELL Secondary Scheduling

Page 18: Principals’ Meeting

Why Gómez & Gómez for LCPS?

Best practices in the mainstream classroom are increasingly important as more and more mainstream classroom teachers have ELLs in their classrooms, yet less than 15% of them have some professional development related to ELLs (de Jong & Harper, 2005).

This creates a serious issue for ELLs in the classroom and for their teachers as the teachers are not able to understand how language influences their teaching and their students’ learning. Many teachers are not getting ELL best practices in their teacher education programs …(O'Hara & Pritchard, 2008).

*Gómez & Gómez: “Here Today, Here to Stay”

Page 19: Principals’ Meeting

Monitoring

Schedules – Required Time

- Core content areas - BLC/BRC

(Bilingual Learning Centers and Bilingual Research Centers)

Environment - Labeling

- Word walls - Desks arranged to

promote collaboration Instructional practices

- Language of Instruction

- Hands on learning- Rigor

What makes the Gómez & Gómez DL framework “Well Implemented”?

In well-implemented DL programs, both ELLs and SLLs do as well or better than peers in other

monolingual programs. (Bruck, Lambert and Tucker, 1974; Hakuta, 1986; Weatherford, 1986)

*Gómez & Gómez: “Here Today, Here to Stay”