Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.
-
Upload
johnathan-mcgee -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.
![Page 1: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presented to the R2PC Executive CommitteeApril 12, 2012
![Page 2: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Census Bureau has been collecting data on migratory patterns since 1940• Migration data released March 28 as
part of American Community Survey (ACS)• First release of migration data since
2000 • ACS Data collected on a rolling annual
average
![Page 3: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Question from ACS: “Where did this person live 1 year ago.
• Respondents provide full address.
• Sample gathered over five years.
![Page 4: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• In-Migration – 128,400
• Out-Migration – 206,600
• Difference – 78,200 net loss
![Page 5: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1. Florida – 13,3002. Ohio – 13,2593. Illinois – 11,1504. California – 7,8285. Indiana – 7,4616. Texas – 6,7397. New York – 4,8878. Wisconsin – 4,8649. North Carolina – 3,70010.Georgia – 3,520
![Page 7: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1. Florida – 23,6452. Ohio – 16,2133. Illinois – 13,7424. Texas – 13,1445. Indiana – 12,0896. California – 11,7647. Arizona – 10,8268. North Carolina – 7,8299. Georgia – 7,55610.Tennessee – 6,404
![Page 9: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. Alaska - 8052. Connecticut – 4393. Vermont - 1444. New Hampshire – 95. Rhode Island - 9
![Page 10: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Michigan has had a net outflow of population since 1998-99
• Still losing population due to negative out-migration, but significant improvement since 2007-2008
• Dependent on economic conditions the automobile industry
• Out-migration peaks in mid-1970’s, early 1980’s (worst), and since 2000.
![Page 12: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Estimates released April, 2012 by Census Bureau
• Components of population change include:• Natural increase/decrease (births minus deaths)• Net international migration (immigrants, emigrants,
military personnel)• Net domestic migration
![Page 13: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 46,626
• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 73• Net international migration – 27• Net domestic migration – (208)
• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 46,518
![Page 14: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 160,168
• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 319• Net international migration – 72• Net domestic migration – (815)
• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 159,744
![Page 15: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 99,762
• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 116• Net international migration – 83• Net domestic migration – (524)
• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 99,437
![Page 16: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 306,556
• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 508• Net international migration – 182• Net domestic migration – (1,547)
• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 305,669
![Page 17: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033105/56649ce55503460f949b2462/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Timothy Anderson, AICP, Principal Planner(517) [email protected] sites of interest:American Community Surveyhttp://www.census.gov/acs/www/index.htmlMichigan Censushttp://www.michigan.gov/cgi/US Census Bureauhttp://www.census.gov/