Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference ... · Action . Program Office/Industry...

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

March 2011

Defense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC)

Executive Overview Brief

Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Agenda

• Introduction

• Mission & Function

• Organizational Structure

• Infrastructure

• Key Products and Services

• Efficiency Innovations

• Summary

2


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Introduction

• Defense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC) Office was established by OSD in 1998 to centrally manage the Contractor Cost Data Report (CCDR) requirement for the entire DOD acquisition community

• CCDRs have evolved to include Software Resource Data Report (SRDR) and the program is today known as the Cost and Software Data Report (CSDR) system

• The DCARC Office provides a centralized management structure for the CSDR requirement, and the collection and distribution of these data

• The DCARC Office also is DOD’s agent for the collection, storage and distribution of Earned Value Management (EVM) reports

• Our primary mission goal is to provide both secure, on-line, access to CSDR and EV reports to DOD cost analysts

• This briefing will highlight our key infrastructure, mission and function, business process, IT tools and efficiency innovations we utilize to meet our primary mission goal

3


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Mission and Function • Mission:

– Provide an accurate record of historical program cost data, within a searchable and easy to use system, for the government cost analyst to create realistic budgets and credible cost estimates

• Goals: – Primary: Cost collection, planning, and execution of the

CSDR process

– Secondary: Cost collection and administration of the EV Central Repository

4


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Organization Structure

Deputy Director of Cost Assessment

DCARC Director

CSDR Operations Support Staff

CSDR Requirement Development & Implementation Support

CSDR Validations

Communications

Outreach & Training

Government Staff IT Product Development & Support Staff

DCARC Helpdesk

Server Maintenance

Software & Web Development

5


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Infrastructure

6

The DCARC staff and IT infrastructure ensure the collection, storage and distribution of CSDR and EV reports for the DOD

Organization Number of CSDR Users by Organization

ARMY 223 AF 310 NAVY 353 OSD 61 DCMA/DCAA 112 Weapons CTR 788 TOTAL 1847

Organization Number of EVM-CR Users by Organization

ARMY 277 AF 451 NAVY 449 OSD 85 DCMA/DCAA 210 Weapons CTR 639 TOTAL 2111


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Key Products and Services

• Products – Deliver CSDR & EV Data to the DOD cost community in secure, on-line systems

• Contractor Cost Data Reports (CCDRs) • Software Resource Data Reports (SRDRs) • Contract Performance Report (CPR)

– Develop and manage CSDR policy & contractual implementation instruments • DoDM 5000.04-M-1 Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual • Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) • Contracts Data Requirement List (CDRLs) • DFARS CSDR Clauses • Policy/Product Innovations

– New 1921-4 Contractor Sustainment Report

– Develop and deliver IT tools • CSDR Planning & Execution Tool (cPet)

– CSDR Plan Development (WBS, Contractual deliverable cost reports) – CCDR Report Validation Tool

• DCARC Knowledge Portal – DACIMS CSDR Data Repository – Earned Value Central Repository – Submit-Review Website – Secure CSDR data submission portal – Innovations to transform DACIMS Repository into Relational Database – Innovations to develop new “Views” of CSDR Data

7 OSD CAPE owns CSDR policy- PARCA owns Earned Value Policy


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED


• Services – Leadership

• OSD CAPE CSDR Steering Committee • CSDR Focus Group • CAPE Cost Assessment Monthly Service Cost Center Chiefs Meeting • CSDR monthly compliance metrics within Defense Acquisition Executive

Summary (DAES)

– Technical Support • Support every MDAP & MAIS Government Program Office • Validate every CSDR Submission and upload into DACIMS • Support every US & Foreign supplier of CSDR data • Manage the CSDR IPT Process

– Training and Outreach • CSDR Training Classes to Government/Industry • DODCAS & SCEA • Support every CSDR Post Contract Award Meeting

8


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CSDR Reporting System

CWBS Dictionary

Cost Data Summary

Report

Functional Cost Hour

Report

Progress Curve Report

Contractor Business

Data Report

Software Resource

Data Reports


9

DD Form 1921

DD Form 1921-1

DD Form 1921-2

DD Form 1921-3

Final Software Developer Report


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Efficiency Innovations

10

Goal Efficiency Innovations Performance Metric

1 Reduce cost of report preparation for industry

• Cpet “flat file” tool used by industry to prepare and validate CCDR reports

# hours required to develop, validate and submit CSDR reports

2 Improve compliance

• Developed, fielded and trained government users on new cPet tool for CSDR Plan development

• MIL-STD-881C WBS based • Produces all key CSDR documents • Improves consistency and utility of all return CSDR data

# hours to develop/approved CSDR Plans

3 Improve Data Quality

• New CSDR IPT business rules • Greater emphasis on Program Office involvement in report validations

# of report acceptances

4 Improve security • Developed and testing new Submit-Review Portal that will replace Erooms

# of security issues

5 Expand application of the CSDR requirement

• New DD Form , DID and CDRL for the 1921-4 Contractor Sustainment Report

# of CSDR Plans and 1921-4 reports for CLS contracts


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Summary

• DCARC Office established in 1998 to provide centralized management of the CCDR requirement and facilitate the storage and distribution of CCDR data to DOD cost analysts

• Today, we collect, store and distribute CSDR reports on every MDAP ACAT 1 and MAIS Program

• Today, we collect, store and distribute all DOD MDAP Earned Value reports

• Today, we offer on-time, direct support to every MDAP and MAIS Government Program Office

• Today, we offer on-time, direct support to US and foreign suppliers of CSDR data

• Today, we continue to listen to our customers to evolve our products and services to the changing needs of the DOD cost community

• Today, the DCARC Office ensures “Data Driven” cost estimates are supported by credible, validated and comprehensive evidence.

11


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

BACKUP

12


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CSDR Data Collection Process

DDCA Approves

Plans ICE

Review

DAB Program Review/

Milestone Approval

PM Issues Solicitation to

Industry

Develop Draft CSDR Plans

Contract Award Industry Submits CSDRs

DCARC Validates CSDRs

Source Selection

13

Final Report

Submitted

6-12 months 6 months

Contract Closeout

24 months

CAPE/DCARC Action

Program Office/Industry

Action


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Setting the stage

• DoD Decision Makers want: – Accurate, timely and authoritative evidence that drives “data driven

resource decisions”

• CSDR Data providers must: – Be consistent in definitions, mapping and WBS structures across

contracts and programs – Provide data of the highest quality, integrity and utility – Adhere to all CSDR policies, procedures, manuals, Data Item

Descriptions, and DCARC business processes

• CSDR Data users must: – Know what data is available and how to obtain it – Apply the data sensibly to your program’s estimating needs – Document methodologies rigorously – Articulate the “evidentiary chain” from actual raw data to estimate

14


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Fundamentals of Cost and Software Data Reports

(CSDR)

15


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Cost Analysis Data Sources

1. Return resource data (i.e., actuals) – Internal contractor accounting records – Deliverable contractor cost reports Cost Performance Report (CPR) Cost/Schedule Status Report Cost & Software Data Reports (CSDRs)

Labor Hours, direct cost, indirect costs, functional cost, G&A, fee

2. Contract line item data (i.e., CLIN or Schedule B prices)

3. Historical obligation data (i.e., historical budgets) 4. Proposal data (i.e., bids, vendor quotes, etc.)

CSDR data is the best data for estimating DoD programs

16


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CSDR = CCDR + SRDR

• Contractor Cost Data Reports (CCDR) Provide standardized cost and hours information across programs Provide recurring/non-recurring split by Work Breakdown Structure

element Provide plan-wide direct and indirect resource data per contractor

facility Provide CWBS Dictionary Will soon provide contractor logistics support cost data

• Software Resources Data Reports (SRDR) Provide software information across programs Provide size, effort, schedule, and other descriptive development

data

What is a CSDR

17


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CCDR

Please see DCARC website for detail descriptions of these forms; http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/default.aspx

DD Form 1921

Displays all WBS elements

Nonrecurring and Recurring costs for all WBS elements

Contract Totals

G&A, Undistributed Budget, Management Reserve,

Facilities Capital Cost of Money, and Profit/Fee

Units for all hardware elements

DD Form 1921-1

Select WBS elements reported

Nonrecurring and Recurring cost breakout

Detailed breakout of all resource data: Labor, material,

and overhead dollars; labor hours

Reporting by all functions: Engineering, Tooling, Quality Control, and Manufacturing

DD Form 1921-2

Select WBS elements reported by Unit or Lot

Direct Recurring Costs to Date

Detailed breakout of direct costs

Reporting by all functions: Engineering, Tooling, Quality Control, and Manufacturing

18


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CCDR

• Provides for one Report per contractor site

• Covers all DoD business

• Direct Costs by Program

• Indirect Cost Categories

• Facility-wide specifics

• Direct labor rates (Functional Categories)

• Total FPR Unit Revenue (Sales)

• Organization Changes

• Accounting Changes

• Remarks

DD 1921-3 Contractor Business Data Report

Please see DCARC website for a detail description of this form; http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/default.aspx

19


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CCDR-continued

• A report for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) contracted efforts

• Recurring-Nonrecurring-Total, To-Date & At-Complete

• Unit Operations

• Unit Level Manpower

• Maintenance

• Sustainment Support

• Continuing System Improvements

• Installation and Personnel Support

• Summary

DD 1921-4 (Contractor Logistics &

Support (CLS) Detail Report

20


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SRDR

1. SRDR formalizes contractor reporting of software development/upgrade metric data and consists of: – Data Reports – Data Dictionary

2. SRDR records both the expectations and actual

results of new software developments or upgrades

21


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

The benefits of CSDR Data 1.Return cost data (i.e. actuals)

– Data from completed development and production contracts for ACAT 1 Programs

2.Data fields that facilitate rigorous cost analysis

– Learning curves using labor hours and recurring costs at various levels of the WBS

– Investigations of direct cost and indirect cost behavior – Contract fee rates – Visibility in major subcontracted items

3.Comparability – The CSDR process is designed to maximize

consistency of data across companies, services, weapon systems types and programs

22


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CSDRs vs other return cost data

1. CSDRs vs CPRs – CPRs typically (& understandably) report costs according to either a process or

organizational structure that is program/contract specific Facilitates program/contract management Does not facilitate cross-program/contract cost analysis OSD AT&L Policy Memorandum states that the CPR, CSDR and IMS should

share a “common WBS” but this is not happening DoD wide – CPRs generally do not identify nonrecurring vs. recurring costs – Widely understood that a common WBS between CPR and CSDR reports is

desirable

2. CSDRs vs. internal contractor accounting records – Internal accounting records typically report costs according to a structure that

does not facilitate cross-program/contract cost analysis – Accounting data is more detailed than CSDRs but takes considerable

time/effort to map and normalize prior to use

Cost data that is organized according to a standard, end-item product oriented WBS is highly desirable

23


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Applications of CSDR Data

24


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

1. PROGRAM 2. PRIME MISSION PRODUCTa. MDAP: Cruize Missile H X PRIME / ASSOCIATEb. PHASE: EMD DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR5. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER 6. CUSTOMER (Direct-Reporting Subcontractor U

a. CONTRACT NO.: N12345-98-C-234b. LATEST MODIFICATION:

8. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 12. REPORT AS OF (YYYYMMDD)INITIAL

a. START DATE (YYYYMMDD) : b. END DATE (YYYYMMDD) : INTERIMX FINAL

13. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) 14. DEPARTMENT 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include Area Code) 16. EMAIL ADDRESS 17. DATE PREPARED (YYYYMMDD)

18. WBS ELEMENT CODE 19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENTX

a. TO DATE: 8.0 b. AT COMPLETION:

ENGINEERING

(1) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS 1.2 7.1 (2) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARS $150.4 357.5 (3) ENGINEERING OVERHEAD DOLLARS $199.0 468.2 (4) TOTAL ENGINEERING DOLLARS $349.4 825.7MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS

(5) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (6) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (7) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (8) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (9) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (10) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (11) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (12) MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS OVERHEAD DOLLARS (Including To XXXX XXXX (13) TOTAL MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 6, 7 XXXX XXXXMATERIALS

(14) RAW MATERIAL DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (15) PURCHASED PARTS DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (16) PURCHASED EQUIPMENT DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (17) MATERIAL HANDLING/OVERHEAD DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (18) TOTAL DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (19) TOTAL MATERIAL DOLLARS XXXX XXXXOTHER COSTS (20) OTHER COSTS NOT SHOWN ELSEWHERE (Specify in Remarks) XXXX XXXXSUMMARY (21) TOTAL COST (Direct and Overhead) XXXX XXXX

DD FORM 1921-1, 20070416 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. SECURITY CLASSIFICAT

$207.1$269.2$476.3

5.9$207.1$269.2

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Unclassified

COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED AT COMPLETIONFUNCTIONAL DATA ELEMENTS

A. NONRECURRING B. RECURRING C. TOTAL D. NONRECURRING E. RECURRING F.TOTAL

c. SOLICITATION NO.:d. NAME:

O&M

21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&EPROCUREMENT

11. RESUBMISSION NUMBER

XXXX

FUNCTIONAL COST-HOUR REPORT

4. NAME/ADDRESS (Include Zip Code)

7. TYPE ACTION

10. SUBMISSION NUMBER

4 20001231

XXXX

357.5

825.7

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXX

7.1

468.2

XXXX

$476.3

1.2$150.4$199.0

XXXX

XXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX22. REMARKS

XXXXXXXX

Unclassified

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXX

XXXX

20010201

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

1.1.4.7

COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE

Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)

5.9

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXX

$349.4

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

3. CONTRACTOR TYPE (X One)

N-09-C-C1 Navy

8.0

20. NUMBER OF UNITS

9. REPORT CYCLE

Missile

• Analysis conducted to reveal correlation between NR Engineering Hours and physical, performance, programmatic characteristics.

Hours data taken from Program H and pooled with several other programs to build a normalized, standardized dataset

NR Engr Hrs = α × (Biasβ1) × (Volβ2) × (Schedβ3)

• Develop estimating relationship used to project NR Engineering hours for a DIFFERENT IMU.

NonrecurringEngineering

Hours Bias Volume Schedule

Program A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Inertial Measurement Unit

5,900

Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p.1 of 3)

18. WBS ELEMENT CODE 19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENTX

a. TO DATE: 8.0 b. AT COMPLETION:

ENGINEERING

(1) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS 1.2 7.1 (2) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARS $150.4 357.5 (3) ENGINEERING OVERHEAD DOLLARS $199.0 468.2 (4) TOTAL ENGINEERING DOLLARS $349.4 825.7

$207.1$269.2$476.3

5.9$207.1$269.2

COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED AT COMPLETIONFUNCTIONAL DATA ELEMENTS

A. NONRECURRING B. RECURRING C. TOTAL D. NONRECURRING E. RECURRING F.TOTAL

O&M

21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&EPROCUREMENT

357.5

825.7

7.1

468.2$476.3

1.2$150.4$199.0

1.1.4.7

COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE

Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)

5.9

$349.4

8.0

20. NUMBER OF UNITS

25


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

IMU Design Engineering Hours

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

- 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

Observed

Pred

icte

d A

E

G

B

FH

C

D

Engineering Hours = 46.5 * (Bias)-0.47 * (Volume)0.43 * (Schedule)1.12

NonrecurringEngineering

HoursBias

(degrees)Volume(cu. cm.)

Schedule(months)

Program A 24,200 1 30 54

B 11,000 2 40 40

C 5,500 2.5 20 32

D 3,500 10 30 34

E 13,750 1 28 48

F 6,200 2 30 24

G 11,350 1 30 40

H 5,900 5 25 36

Inertial Measurement Unit

Data pulled from programmatic and schedule documents

Data pulled from technical documents

Data pulled from CCDR DD Form 1921-1Functional Cost-Hour Report

Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p. 2 of 3)

26


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p.3 of 3)

Engineering Hours = 46.5 * (Bias)-0.47 * (Volume)0.43 * (Schedule)1.12

NonrecurringEngineeringHours

Bias (degrees)

Volume(cu. Cm.)

Schedule(months)

Generic Supersonic Cruise Missile 11,356.7 1 24 40ESTIMATE

11,356.7 Hrs40.00$ Engineering Labor Rate

454,268.0$ Direct Engineering Labor Dollars

115% Engineering Overhead Rate522,408.2$ Engineering Overhead Dollars

120,000.00$ Material Dollars

46,787.0$ ODC Dollars

1,143,464.4$ Total Engineering Dollars

INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT

27


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Unclassified

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

a. MDAP:

b. PHASE:

6. CUSTOMER (Direct-Reporting Subcontractor Use Only)a. CONTRACT NO.:b. LATEST MODIFICATION:

12. REPORT AS OF (YYYYMMDD)a. START DATE (YYYYMMDD): INITIALb. END DATE (YYYYMMDD): INTERIM

FINAL15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include Area Code) 17. DATE PREPARED (YYYYMMDD)

18. WBS ELEMENT CODEX

X

A4

31.040.00.0

(5a) (5b) (5c)

5.0 26.0$175.0 910.0

0.7 3.6$12.6 64.8$4.0 18.00.8 4.0

$17.6 88.06.8 33.7

$102.0 505.5$136.2 676.3

DD FORM 1921-2, 20070416 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE.

$0.0

Unclassified

16. E-MAIL ADDRESS

20. UNITS/LOTS COMPLETED

C. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE

A3

7.0$245.0

11.020.0

B. WORK IN PROCESS (WIP)

$111.0$170.5

5. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER

AIRFRAME

13. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) 14. DEPARTMENT

LOT TOTAL PROCUREMENT

10. SUBMISSION NUMBER8. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9. REPORT CYCLE

1. PROGRAM

7. TYPE ACTION

PRIME / ASSOCIATE

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.

21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&E

(1) MODEL AND SERIES (2) FIRST UNIT 1.0

A2

0.0

21.0

O&M

A. COMPLETED UNITS/LOTS

PROGRESS CURVE REPORT

8.3

1.0$18.0$6.01.0

0.8

$22.0

UNIT TOTAL

0.0$0.0

$0.0

$19.8

$148.2

22. REMARKS

(3) LAST UNIT0.0

d. NAME:

0.0

$0.00.0

$0.0$0.0$0.0

SpeedPower

(6) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS (7) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARSMANUFACTURING OPERATIONS (RECURRING ONLY)

6.0$210.0$280.0

10.0

8.0

(4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0

ENGINEERING (RECURRING ONLY)

CHARACTERISTICS

Weight

30.0

(15) TOTAL DIRECT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 9,10,12, and (14) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS

$14.4

$168.0

(8) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS (9) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS (10) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS

(19) TOTAL DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR DOLLARS

(13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS

$3.00.9

$19.87.4

$5.0

$124.5

(11) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS

OTHER COSTS (RECURRING ONLY) (21) OTHER DIRECT COSTS NOT SHOWN ELSEWHERE (Specify in Remarks)

MATERIALS (RECURRING ONLY)

(16) RAW MATERIALS DOLLARS (17) PURCHASED PARTS DOLLARS (18) PURCHASED EQUIPMENT DOLLARS

(20) TOTAL DIRECT MATERIAL DOLLARS

(12) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS1.3

$28.611.2

$221.4

2. PRIME MISSION PRODUCT 3. CONTRACTOR TYPE

DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR

4. NAME/ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code)

11. RESUBMISSION NUMBER

b. SOLICITATION NO.:

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

(22) TOTAL DIRECT COSTSUMMARY (RECURRING ONLY)

1.1

DATA ELEMENTS

1.1.3

19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENT

A1

Estimating Manufacturing Hours

example (p.1 of 3)

Quantity data

Hours and Dollars data

Progress Curve Report

A4

31.040.00.035.3

DATA ELEMENTS

A1

10.0 (4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0 (3) LAST UNIT

0.0


0.0

21.030.0


A2

11.020.0

A3

Calculated Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3

0.7$12.6$4.00.8

$17.6$6.8

$102.0$136.2

$111.0$170.5

$8.3

1.0$18.0$6.01.0

0.8

$22.0

$19.8

$148.2

MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS (RECURRING ONLY)

(15) TOTAL DIRECT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 9,10,12, and (14) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS

$14.4

$168.0

(8) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS (9) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS (10) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS

(13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS

$3.00.9

$19.8$7.4

$5.0

$124.5

(11) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS (12) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS

1.3$28.6$11.2

$221.4

1.1

28


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Estimating Manufacturing Hours example (p. 2 of 3)

A4

31.040.00.035.3

6.8

Calculated Lot Average Unit Hours 0.68

DATA ELEMENTS

A1

11.2 (13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS 7.4

10.0 (4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0 (3) LAST UNIT

0.0


8.3

0.0

21.030.0


A2

11.020.0

A3

1.12 0.83 0.74

Calculated Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3

Lot Avg Unit Hrs Lot Midpoint1.12 4.20.83 15.20.74 25.30.68 35.3

• Analysis conducted to reveal relationship between lot midpoint quantity and lot average unit direct manufacturing hours • Data plotted and regressed to calculate first unit (T1) hours and progress curve slope

Lot Avg Unit Mfg Hrs = T1 (midpoint)

b

Quantity data taken from LRIP I are used to calculate Lot Midpoints. Hours data used to calculate lot average unit hours.

Quantity data

Hours data

29


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Estimating Manufacturing Hours example (p. 3 of 3)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Lot Midpoint

Ave

rage

Uni

t Man

ufac

turin

g H

ours

(Tho

usan

ds)

1.12

0.83

0.740.68

Lot I Lot II

0.58

Using the LRIP I Progress Curve data, the analyst can estimate Lot Average Unit Direct Manufacturing Hours for the LRIP II option of 60 airframes (units #41-100 ) as 0.58 hours (thousands). The analyst may also want to model rate effects.

LRIP II (option)Quantity 10 10 10 10 60Unit # 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-100Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3 35.3 67.8Lot Avg Unit Hrs 1.12 0.83 0.74 0.68 0.58

LRIP I

Lot Average Unit Manufacturing Hours (thousands) = 1.57 (Lot Midpoint) -0.23

30


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DCARC Systems Overview

31

DCARC Portal Provides Single Login Access To CSDR and EVM Systems


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

CSDR Systems Overview

• Key DCARC IT Systems Supporting CSDR Functions – cPET (Web): Preparing CSDR Plans, RDT, Validations – cPET (Desktop): Preparing CSDR submissions, pre-validation – CSDR-SR: Manages CSDR Submission and Review Business

Functions – DACIMS: CSDR Repository Supporting Cost Estimating

Functions

32 Core CSDR IT Systems


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Access to CSDR data • Defense Automated Cost Information Management System (DACIMS)

is the DCARC’s repository of CSDR type data • CSDR data is proprietary, therefore access is controlled • Government Employees

– On-line access to the DACIMS repository requires registration through the DCARC website

– A DACIMS account allows users to access CSDR data only

• Support contractors – Must demonstrate a Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA) with industry – An NDA will not grant you on-line access – Access to CSDR reports must be through your registered government

customer, or by ad-hoc data pulls by the DCARC staff • FFRDC’s – Similar to Support Contractors • Outside Agencies- Not currently permitted access

33


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Final Thoughts

• Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) = CCDRs + SRDRs

• CCDRs are the ‘best’ standardized source of return cost (& labor hour) data – Organized according to standard, product oriented WBS (i.e., MIL-

HDBK-881) – Provide useful visibility into resources (cost and hours)

• SRDRs are the ‘best’ standardized source of software metrics

• CSDRs are required for all – Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP), i.e., ACAT I programs – Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS), i.e., ACAT IA programs

• The OSD CAPE Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) Office manages the collection and dissemination of this data

• The Defense Automated Cost Information System (DACIMS), DCARC’s repository for CCDRs & SRDRs, houses contract data for all ACAT 1C/1D MDAPs since 1960

An essential part of every cost analyst’s toolbox

34


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Credible cost estimates enable realistic budgets, executable contracts & program stability – A win/win for DOD & industry

• DoD experience indicates that return cost data (i.e., actuals) for

completed development & production contracts facilitate credible cost estimates – Used in the proper context, actuals are far & away the best basis of

estimate

• CSDRs are DoD’s only systematic mechanism for capturing actuals that provide the right visibility and consistency needed to develop credible cost estimates

In Closing-Why CSDRs?

Cost analysts must be strong CSDR advocates

35


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Additional Resources

• Bi-annual CSDR Training sponsored by the DCARC

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/index.aspx • Complete on-line CSDR training class

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/tutorials.aspx • DCARC Website

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/ • Ad Hoc Inquires Mike Augustus, Director DCARC, (571) 372-4267 [email protected] Rob Currie, CSDR Lead Instructor, (571) 372-4262

[email protected]

36


http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/index.aspx

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/tutorials.aspx

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference ... · Action . Program Office/Industry...

Documents

Transcript of Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference ... · Action . Program Office/Industry...