Presentation SONA Q4
-
Upload
silvia-prastani -
Category
Business
-
view
182 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Presentation SONA Q4
![Page 1: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SONA Q3 :July- September
“Health + Performances = Success"
![Page 2: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PARAMETERs:
PERFORMANCEs: - Exchange
- Exchange + Leadership - Leadership Role - Members - n° of member for each X realized
HEALTH : - costumers relation
- Exchange - Communication - Talent Management - Finance - Organizational Structure
![Page 3: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Modality of Evaluation:
1. Each Parameter has a score
2. I define the total score for performance and health
3. I calculate an average between performance and health
4. The average is the indicator for the status of each LC
![Page 4: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LC’s SITUATION for Q4
![Page 5: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RANKING Q3
LCs (31 Dec 2010)
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Serie1
![Page 6: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What is the “campione ottimale”
It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best LC.
In this way you can understand in which situation are your areas comparing these
with the “ campione ottimale”
![Page 7: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ANCONA
ANCONA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 8: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
BARI
BARI
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exc
hang
e
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 9: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
BOLZANO
BOLZANO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 10: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CATANIA:
CATANIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 11: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
GENOVA
GENOVA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 12: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MILANO CATTOLICA
MILANO CATTOLICA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 13: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 14: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 15: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PALERMO
PALERMO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 16: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PAVIA
PAVIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 17: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PISA
PISA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 18: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ROMA SAPIENZA
ROMA SAPIENZA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 19: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ROMA TRE
ROMA TRE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 20: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
TORINO
TORINO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 21: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
TRENTO
TRENTO
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 22: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
TRIESTE
TRIESTE
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 23: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
VENEZIA
VENEZIA
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Cus
tom
erR
elat
ion
Exch
ange
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Stru
ctur
e
Com
mun
icat
ion Fi
nanc
e
Tale
ntM
anag
emen
t
ca
mpi
one
ottim
ale
Serie1
![Page 24: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Best LC for each subsystem
Costumer Relation: Ancona, Bari, Genova, Napoli Parthenope, Sapienza, Roma Tre, Venezia
Exchange: Ancona, Catania,Palermo, Roma Tre
Communication:Palermo, Torino
Finance:Venezia, Pavia, Palermo
Talent Management:Ancona, Milano Cattolica, Palermo
![Page 25: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CLUSTERs Q4
![Page 26: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Explenation:
In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on performance and health.
In the next slide you can discover the average of each LCs.
Average = (Perf. + Heal.) / 2
![Page 27: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Average of LCs:
LC name PERF. HEALTH TOT
Ancona 2 1,7 1,85
Bari 1 2,1 1,55
Bolzano 0,8 1,4 1,1
Catania 1,4 1,6 1,5
Genova 0,6 2 1,3
Milano Cattolica 0,6 1,7 1,15
Napoli Federico 2 0,8 1,5 1,15
Napoli Parthenope 1,2 2 1,6
Palermo 1,4 2,1 1,75
Pavia 1 1,4 1,2
Pisa 0,4 1,1 0,75
Roma Sapienza 1 1,7 1,35
Roma Tre 1,4 1,9 1,65
Torino 1,6 2,1 1,85
Trento 0,8 1,7 1,25
Trieste 0,8 1,3 1,05
Venezia 0,2 1,9 1,05
![Page 28: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
1th Cluster
10X 3 X+L 8 LR
40 M 18-24 H
AVERAGE
2,51 – 4
No one LC is in this cluster for the Q4
WHO WANT TO COVER THIS POSITION ???
![Page 29: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2th Cluster
6 X 2 X+L 6 LR
30 M 12-17 H
AVERAGE
1,51 – 2,50
LC:
-Ancona
-Bari
-Napoli Parthenope
-Palermo
-Roma Tre
-Torino
![Page 30: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3th Cluster
3 X 1 X+L 2 LR
10 M 6-11 H
AVERAGE
0 – 1,50
LCs
Bolzano
Catania
Genova
Milano Cattolica
Napoli Federico II
Pavia
Pisa
Roma Sapienza
Trento
Trieste
Venezia
![Page 31: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
CONGRATULATION TO:
Napoli Parthenope
Ancona
Bari
Roma Tre
Palermo
For their new position in Cluster 2
![Page 32: Presentation SONA Q4](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062707/5584bb1dd8b42a85768b4e33/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Italian Do it Better…
For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project
Good Work…