Prepared by: Amar kabashi ( [email protected] ) &&

A Technical Framework for Designing Wireless Sensor Networks for Agricultural Monitoring in

Developing Regions

Prepared by: Amar kabashi ([email protected])&&

Presented by: Hamada Alshaer ([email protected])

mailto:[email protected]

Outline• Motivations • Objective • Monitoring System Characteristics • Agricultural application-specific characteristics • Monitoring Framework Design Challenges• Technical Monitoring Framework • Contributions under investigation

– Zone-based joint topology control and power scheduling – Multi-Sink Architecture and Back-link/Storage aware

complementary routing – Network self buffering and Back-link/Storage aware

complementary routing – Parameter-Energy-Environment aware Task Scheduling

• VESEL System • System Testing

www.veselproject.net

Motivations• Developing the underdeveloped countries through information and

communication technologies deployment.

• Improving the quality of life in the least developed poor environments.

• Ubiquitous wireless sensor networks and context-aware applications.

• Wireless sensing for agricultural applications development:

– Maximizing the productivity of irrigation and farming resources while maintaining the quality and integrity of land and environment.

– Optimizing natural resource utilization to maximize production and minimize environmental and economic risks.


Objective

Design and implementing an efficient and optimal field monitoring system that:

1. provides valuable data about land conditions, water usage and climate variability

2. back-supported by a capable data processing platform for analysis and interpretation which leads to eventual proper dissemination of the learned outcomes.


Monitoring System Characteristics

• It should be continuous, fairly accurate, automated and able to cover wide fields, while being affordable by the resource-limited communities and tolerant to technical faults and environmental conditions.

• The system’s life time should be typically long; covering at least a whole cropping season of 4-6 months, without maintenance.

• It should be remotely accessible and controllable to enable distant analysis and decision making by centralized expertise, typically in distant urban areas, or by foreign expertise.

• It should enable long term nationwide research/modelling/planning as well as short term, quasi-real-time, local response.


Monitoring Framework Design Challenges

• Scarce deployment of nodes in relatively large fields.

• Unreliable, intermittent upload links.• Informatics gap; Lack of proper IS infrastructure

for data analysis, modelling, interpretation and dissemination.


Agricultural application-specific characteristics

• It is highly preferable to have a fairly good idea about the field conditions for long time than having a high precision field mapping over a short period. With a relaxed accuracy requirement, many power conservation strategies could be adopted at the physical layer, e.g. signal conditioning and data conversion.

• Spatial homogeneity (field zoning) could be used to optimize the WSN topology and deployment of the scarce nodes. This has a direct impact on the power consumption and network life.

• Real time and accuracy requirements are fairly relaxed. Closed-loop real time sensing-and-control solutions are generally not feasible to be deployed in such a highly resource-limited environment. Such a tolerance for delay enables better optimization of the network resources and relaxes the burden on the communication protocols.


Technical Monitoring Framework

Node Scarcity Network Lifetime Unreliable Back-links

Zone-based Topology Control& Power Scheduling

- Multi-Sink Architecture.- Back-link/Storage aware Complementary Routing

Parameter-Energy-Environmentaware Task Scheduling.

Informatics Back-support

VeSeL’s Knowledge Management System


Zone-based joint topology control and power scheduling• To guarantee adequate field coverage, each field ‘zone’ could be covered by a single

node, leading to a highly reduced node density. • This approach, however, risks the coverage and reliability of the network when nodes

fail. • To address this problem we propose a new zone-based topology control mechanism that

dynamically projects the network topology on the ‘field homogeneity map’.

Figure 1. Zone-based node deployment with two possible connected graphs

Zone (D) Zone (C)

Zone (A)

Zone (B)

Zone (E)

Network nodes belonging to different connected graphs Network coordinator node.


Zone-based joint topology control and power scheduling

START

INITIALI--ZING

ACTIVE

IDLE/ SLEEP

IDLE/ AWAKE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Figure 2. State diagram of the Zone-based joint topology control and power scheduling mechanism

Path Number

Transition Triggers

1 First network power-on.

2 a. First network initialization process.b. Failure of an active node.

3 Belonging of a node to the current selected graph.

4 Non-belonging of a node to the current selected graph.

5 Idle mode duty cycle. (Periodic).

6 On-zone active mode is alive and no further instructions.

7 Instruction from the network coordinator to re-initialize.

By using this technique, significant power conservation could be realized while maintaining good field coverage and network reliability, with a typical scarce deployment.

In the Idle-Awake state, only the RF module, and partially the processing module, are ‘on’.


Multi-Sink Architecture and Back-link/Storage aware Complementary Routing

• To address the challenge of unreliable back-links, and the optimization of back-link usage for cost purposes, we propose a new architecture and protocol inspired by the Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) concept.

• A multi-sink architecture is proposed where the sensed data is aggregated in several nodes, providing an alternative way for data collection. These sink nodes are to be located along the edge of the field for automatic data logging when some

• Complementary hand-held devices pass by. (In the VESEL project these devices are part of a community Resource Kit which also serves other purposes). Here their frequent existence around the field is opportunistically exploited. The multiplicity of sinks is then primarily for storage and distributed data collection purposes.

• Each node relays its data to only one sink, depending on the route cost and storage availability, while keeping a list of all reachable sinks for reliability. The sinks then mirror their storage through their inter-sink backbone. This is to avoid increased power consumption and interference.


Network self-buffering & Back-link/Storage aware Complementary Routing

Routing Request at a Router Node

Execute rules of the multi-hop routing protocol to find next

hop.

Route locally according to ‘Storage Space Balancing’ Rules

Is the back-link available & of

acceptable Quality?

Enough Capacity in Sinks’ Storage ?

NO YES

YES

NO

Network nodes exchange current storage availability info. The network gateway node periodically broadcasts the backbone link status.

When the back-link is not available, or of bad quality, and the storage capacity of the sink (s) is not appropriate, then the data will be either locally buffered or routed within the network until circumstances change.

neighboring nodes are treated as temporary external buffers

The basic routing criteria are :- Balancing the overall ‘storage space’ of the network so as to maximize data life time by minimizing memory capacity run-outs and consequent data overwrites. •- Minimizing the added energy cost for both storage (using non-volatile flash memories) and delivery (radio + processing). By specifying an upper bound for the permitted added energy for every packet, the network could specify the furthest node that it could route the packet to under ‘no-back-link’ condition.


Parameter-Energy-Environment aware Task Scheduling

Figure. 4. System interrelations in the proposed task scheduling mechanism

Physical Parameters Available Energy Environmental Sensors

ADC Bit Resolution

Sampling Rate

Frequency of Transmission

Processing Module Sensing Module RF Module

Propagation Conditions

Parameter Variability

Triggered Sensing

Scheduling Indicators

System

Parameters

Node Modules

Extending the well known cross-layer power optimization concept we propose a dynamic task scheduling mechanism that is aware of the different parameters to be sensed, the energy resources available and the environmental factors that affect the sensing and network operation.

Accordingly, three system parameters are adaptively rescheduled ;Sampling Rate, Bit Resolution and Frequency of Transmission.

This mechanism optimizes power consumption across the three basic modules of a typical sensor node, namely; sensing, processing and radio.


VeSeL System

Agricultural Parameters Soil moisture, soil temperature, relative humidity, air temperature, ambient light, solar radiation and barometric pressure.

Node Processor Atmel Atmega128L, 8-bit, 7.37 MHz.

Memory 512 KB (Flash), 4 KB (RAM), 4 KB (EEPROM)

RF Transceivers a. Chipcon CC2420, 2.4 GHz, 250 kbps, IEEE 802.15.4 (Zigbee) for intra-networking (all nodes).b. GPRS for back-linking (gateway node).c. IEEE.15.1 (Bluetooth) for alternative local data collection (sink nodes + gateway).

Sensors a. UC-Berkely MTS400 Multi-sensor board .b. Decagon ECH2O Soil moisture + temperature probes (EC-TM)- ±%3 accuracy without calibration.

Energy Sources AA batteries – (Solar recharging for sink nodes).

CoreOperating Sys. Tiny-OS (Open Source- nesC programming )

Zigbee

Wireless Sensor Network

Data logging & Storage. Processing: - Interpolation. - Correlation. - Analysis & Modelling.

Decision Making / Planning. Final Interpretation & Formulation

of output.

Dissemination to Agricultural Decision Makers.

Dissemination to Community

GPRS

GPRS

Bluetooth

Resource Kit

Resource Kit

Data Acquisition

Server/KMS

Figure. 5. VESEL System Architeture

Technical specification summary for prototype -1, vesel project

Colour-coded parametric field maps & network topology.

Temperature

Humidity

Sensor node in the test field


VeSeL SystemVisualization Alerting

Learning/Research Network Control

WSN usage interfaces

Within VeSeL the sensor network is part of an ecology of resources that also include Distributed Resource Kits (DRK) as a knowledge mobilizer and Knowledge Management System (KMS) as a system hub.

VeSeL’s ecology of resources

The real value of the sensing technology in a development context is ultimately shaped by the degree of creativity in designing the usage scenarios and user interfaces. This will widen the accessibility scope and extend the usability to other spaces such as education and capacity building. It will also aid in properly disseminating the learned outcomes to different parties in the community.


System Testing

Network Testing in Kew Gardens(London) where the proposed techniques are being investigated under real-world conditions.

Final research results will be ready towards the end of the year. www.veselproject.net

Thank You!

Prepared by: Amar kabashi ( [email protected] ) &&

Documents

Transcript of Prepared by: Amar kabashi ( [email protected] ) &&