Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (In dia) L...
Transcript of Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (In dia) L...
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
1
ANNEXURE: 1Executive summary of the project:Name of the Project : M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd
Location : Plot no 63,6A,6B, Rasayani Road, Vill. Madap, Tq. Khalapur,
Dist. Raigad.( Maharashtra)
Project M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd is located at Madap at private land , falling under Medium Scale category
manufacturing products as mentioned under for which the company had obtained consent to establish andOperate from Maharashtra pollution Control Board.
The company proposes to enhance the capacity of existing products under the category “Synthetic OrganicChemicals”
Proposed Project Cost: Rs. 24.05 Cr.
Applicability of EIA notification – 2006 Category as per the EIA notification- 2006 as amended: existing and proposed products (i.e. Synthetic Organic
Chemicals) are covered under the Category-5(f) A–. Hence, Environmental clearance is required. Submission for obtaining EC under provision of EIA notification 14 September 2006 as amended.
Project Proponent Indian Limited Firm comprising 4 directors Medium Scale Unit
LIST OF FINISHED PRODUCTS & BY- PRODUCTS:
No Product MT/MONTHExisting Proposed Total after
proposed expansion
1 Esters 80 0 80
2 Ethoxylates 80 0 80
3 Speciality Chemicals 40 0 40
4 Amphoterics 5 0 5
5 Propoxylates 0 120 120
6 Ester Emulsions 0 300 300
7 Blending Chemicals 0 300 300
8 Block Co polymer ( EO /PO) 0 200 200
Total 205 920 1125
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
2
Resource Requirement Raw material Consumption
Product Name of RM RM consumption in MTPer ton of product Per month
Existing After ProposedExpansion
Esters Sorbitol ( 70% ) 0.464 37.12 37.12Oleic acid 0.755 60.4 60.4
Total 1.219 97.52 97.52Ethoxylates Lauryl alcohol 0.3195 25.56 25.56
Ethylene oxide 0.6804 54.432 54.432Total 0.9999 79.992 79.992
SpecialityChemicals
Diethylene triamine 0.28 11.2 11.2Tall oil fatty acids 0.86 34.4 34.4
Total 1.14 45.6 45.6Amphoterics Dimethyl amino propyl
amine0.0934
0.467 0.467coconut oil 0.199 0.995 0.995Sodium meta bi sulphite 0.1084 0.542 0.542Epichlohydrin 0.0993 0.4965 0.4965Water 0.500 2.5 2.5
Total 1.001 5.005 5.005Pro poxylates Di propylene glycol 0.378 0 45.36
Propylene oxide 0.621 0 74.52Total 0.999 0 119.88
Ester Emulsions Poly iso butylene 0.91 0 273Maleic anhydride 0.09 0 27
Total 1 0 300Blending
ChemicalsCetostearyl alcohol 0.447 0 134.1Ethylene oxide 0.461 0 138.3Phosphorous pentaoxide
0.0900 27
Total 0.998 0 299.4EOPO 2-Propyl heptanol 0.23 0 46
Ethylene oxide 0.39 0 78Propylene oxide 0.38 0 76
Total 1 0 200
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
3
UtilitiesComponents Existing Proposed Resources availability
Power, KVA 225 200Will be sourced fromMSEDCL
Fresh Water, kl/day 72 8Will be sourced fromIrrigation dept.
Briquittes forThermopack 1 No & Steam Boiler
3 MT/Day 5 MT/Day local dealer
Fuel (HSD) for D.G.Set(Capacity: 750 KVA)
300 Lit/day 0Will be sourced Local Dealer
Water and Waste Water Management Total Raw Water requirement is 80 kl/day supply will be met from Patalganga river. Copy of permission obtained
from irrigation department Raigad is enclosed herewith. Total industrial Waste Water Generation is 22 KL/Day. Domestic waste water (3.0 KL/day) will be disposed off through Septic Tank.
Air Emission and its Control MeasuresFlue gas emission: At present, the unit is having one number of Thermopac and 1 number of Steam Boiler. At present, the unit is having one number of 350 KVA of D G set (standby). It will be used only during power
failure. Adequate stack height and stack monitoring facilities are provided as per rule.
Process gas emission: There is no process emission from manufacturing process since it is close vessel reaction.
Hazardous Wastes and its Management
Sr. No. Type of hazardouswaste
Category Quantity, TPA Place ofStorage
Disposal
Existing Afterproposedexpansion
1 Waste from ETP 34.3 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF2 Used oil 5.1 0.06 1.5 Drum Sell to registered
re-refiner3 Waste & Residue 23.1 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
4
Annexure 2The map showing general location, specific location and project boundary and project site layout of M/s. LakelandChemicals (India) Ltd located at Plot no 63,6A,6B, Rasayani Road, Vill. Madap, Tq. Khalapur, Dist. Raigad.( Maharashtra). The location of the project site can be viewed in Figure 2.1
Fig . 2 Location map showing the project site
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
5
10 KM radius
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
6
Site Plan
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
7
ANNEXURE: 3Detailed project description with process details - MANUFACTURING PROCESSThe company is using the latest available process technology for the production. This chapter includes themanufacturing process of the product, chemical reactions, and material mass balance & mole balance for theproduct.(1.0) Esters: FLOW DIAGRAM & DETAILS
Procedure:
1) Charge sorbitol & oleic acid to the reaction vessel & heat it to 210 -230°c temperature to achieve requiredspecifications of sorbitan monooleate.
2) Then cool the product , filter through filter press & pack in suitable container.
SORBITOL
By pump
by
Reaction vessel
Oleic acid bypump
SorbitanMonooleate
Filtration Packing
NaOH catalyst
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
8
Calculation for the Molecular weight Of Esters
Sorbitan Monoleate
Molecular weight of Sorbitol C6 H14 O6
C6 = 6 X 12 = 72
H14 = 14 X 1 = 14
O6 = 6 X 16 = 96
Total = 182 (100%)
Molecular weight of oleic acid C18 H108 O8
C18 = 18 X 12 = 216
H34 = 34 X 1 = 34
O8 = 2 X 16 = 32
Total = 282
1 mole Sorbitol 70 % + 1.5 mole Oleic acid = Sorbitan Mono oleate + Water
i.e 260 + 423 = 560 + 18 X 6.83(123)
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Sorbitol ( 70% ) – 0.464 Kg2) Oleic acid - 0.755 Kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
9
(2.0) Ethoxylate: FLOW DIAGRAM & Details
Procedure:
1. Charge Lauryl alcohol & catalyst to the reaction vessel & remove the air from the reactor by applyingvacuum & subsequently replacing by nitrogen.
2. Heat it to required temperature of reactions ranging from 130 -160°c.3. React ethylene oxide maintaining specific temperature & pressure to achieve required specifications of
LAKPOL LAL -9004. Then cool the product , filter & pack in suitable container.
Ethylene oxide
Lauryl alcohol/ Fatty acids/HCO/Amines
Reaction vessel
Filtration
KOH catalyst
Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
10
Calculation for the Molecular weight of ETHOXYLATES (LAL -900)
Molecular weight of Lauryl alcohol C12 H26 O
C12 = 12 X 12 = 144
H26 = 26 X 1 = 26
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 186
Molecular weight of Ethylene oxide C2 H4 O
C2 = 2 X 12 = 24
H4 = 4 X 1 = 4
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 44
Molecular weight of LAKPOL LAL 900
Lauryl alcohol + 9 mole of ethylene oxide = LAKPOL LAL 900
I.e. 186 + (9 X 44) = 582
Raw material requirement per kg
1. Lauryl alcohol – 0.3195 Kg2. Ethylene oxide - 0.6804 Kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
11
(3.0) Speciality Chemicals : FLOW DIAGRAM AND DETAILS
Procedure:
1. Charge Diethylene triamine & Tall oil fatty acid to the reaction vessel & heat it to initially at 160-170 °c &then at 220 -225°c temperature to achieve required specifications of Imidazoiln 18 DA.
2. Then cool the product , filter through filter press & pack in suitable container
DiethyleneTriamine
By dosing pump
by
Reaction vessel
Tall oil fatty acidby pump
Filtration Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
12
Calculation for the Molecular weight of Specialty (IMIDAZOLIN 18 DA)
Molecular weight of Diethylene triamine (DETA) C4 H13 N3
C4 = 4 X 12 = 48
H13 = 13 X 1 = 13
N3 = 3 X 14 = 42
Total = 103
Molecular weight of Tall oil fatty acid C18 H33 O2
C18 = 18 X 12 = 216
H34 = 34 X 1 = 33
O2 = 2 X 16 = 32
Total = 281
1.6 mole Diethylene Triamine + 1.8 mole Tall oil Fatty acid = Imidazoline 18 DA + Water ofreaction
103 (1.6) + 281 X 1.8 = 585 + 18 X 4.75
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Diethylene triamine – 0.28 Kg2) Tall oil fatty acids - 0.86 Kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
13
(4.0) Amphoterics : Flow diagram & details
Procedure:
1. Charge Dimethyl amino propyl amine & coconut oil to the reaction vessel & heat it to 150 -160°ctemperature to achieve required specifications of CPA (Stage I).
2. Charge sodium metabisulphite, epichlohydrin, catalyst & water to the reaction vessel & heat it to 60 -70 °ctemperature to achieve required specifications of HPS (Stage II).
3. Charge CPA, catalyst & water to the reaction vessel & heat it to 70-95 °c temperature to achieve requiredspecifications of CAHS (Stage III).
4. Then cool the product , filter through filter press & pack in suitable container.
Dimethyl aminopropylamine
By dosing pump
by
Dimethyl aminopropylamine
By dosing pump
byReaction vessel
CPA
Coconut oil
By pump
Filtration
Epichlohydrin
By dosingpump
by
Sodiummetabisulphite
Reaction vessel
HPS
Waterbypump
Reaction vessel
LAKTONE CAHS
Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
14
Calculation for the Molecular weight of AMPHOTERICS
(LAKTONE CAHS)
Stage: I Coco amidopropyl amine (CPA)
Molecular weight of Dimethyl amino propylamine C5 H14 N2
C5 = 5 X 12 = 60
H14 = 14 X 1 = 14
N2 = 2 X 14 = 28
Total = 102
Molecular weight of coconut oil C40 H76 O6
C40 = 40 X 12 = 480
H76 = 76 X 1 = 76
O2 = 6 X 16 = 96
Total = 652
Molecular weight of CPA
3 mole Dimethyl amino propyl amine + 1 mole coconut oil = 3 mole of CPA
102 X 3 + 652 = 958
Stage: II HPS
Molecular weight of Sodium metabisulphite Na2S2O5
Na2 = 2 X 23 = 46
S2 = 2 X 32 = 64
O5 = 5 X 16 = 80
Total = 190
Molecular weight of Epichlohydrin C3 H5Cl O
C3 = 3 X 12 = 36
H5 = 5 X 1 = 5
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Cl = 1X35.5 = 35.5
Total = 92.5
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
15
Molecular weight of HPS
1 mole of Sodium metabisulphite + 1.89 mole of Epichlohydrin + 42.2 mole of water = HPS
190 + 174 + 760 = 1124
Stage: III LAKTONE CAHS
Molecular weight of CAHS
3 mole of CPA + 1.87 mole of HPS + 12 mole of water = CAHS
958 + 1.87 X 1124 + 216 = 3276
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Dimethyl amino propyl amine – 0.0934 Kg2) coconut oil - 0.199 Kg3) Sodium metabisulphite -0.1084 kg4) Epichlohydrin -0.0993 kg5) Water - 0.500 Kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
16
(5.0) Propoxylates : FLOW DIAGRAM & DETAILS
Procedure:
1. Charge dipropylene glycol & catalyst to the reaction vessel & heat it to 110 -130°c temperature.2. React propylene oxide maintaining temperature & pressure to achieve required specifications Indow 4003. Then cool the product , filter to remove suspended impurities & pack in suitable container
Propylene oxide KOH catalyst
Dipropylene glycol
Reaction vessel
Filtration Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
17
Calculation for the Molecular weight of Propoxylates (Indow 400)
Molecular weight of Dipropylene glycol C6 H14 O3
C6 = 6 X 12 = 72
H14 = 14 X 1 = 14
O3 = 3 X 16 = 48
Total = 134
Molecular weight of Propylene oxide C3 H6 O
C3 = 3 X 12 = 36
H6 = 4 X 1 = 6
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 58
Molecular weight of Indow 400
1 mole dipropylene glycol +3.8 mole of Propylene oxide = Indow 400
I.e. 134 + (3.8 X 58) = 354.4
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Dipropylene glycol – 0.378 Kg2) Propylene oxide - 0.621 kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
18
(6.0) Ester Emulsions : PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM & DETAILS:- Ester Emulsions ( LAKPOL TP 1050)
Polyisobutyleneby pump
Reaction vesselMaleicanhydride
Filtration
Polyisobutylene succinicanhydride
PIBSA
TEPA Reaction vessel Solvent naphtha,heavy aromatic
Filtration
Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
19
Procedure:
Stage I: Polyisobutylene succinic anhydride (PIBSA)
1. Charge Polyisobutylene to the reaction vessel & heat it to required temperature210 -230°c, then charge theMaleic anhydride & continue the digestion till achieve required specifications PIBSA .
2. Then cool the product, filter through filter press & transfer to intermediate vessel.
Stage II: LAKPOL TP 1050 (PIBSI)
1) Charge Tetraethylene pentamine , PIBSA, & solvent naphtha heavy aromatic to the reaction vessel & heat itto 130 -170°c temperature to achieve required specifications of LAKPOL TP 1050.
2) Cool the product.3) filter through filter press & pack in suitable container
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
20
Calculation for ESTER EMULSION (LAKPOL TP 1050) (PIBSI)
Stage I: Polyisobutylene succinic anhydride (PIBSA)
Molecular weight of Polyisobutylene (C71 H141)
C71 = 71 X 12 = 852
H141 = 141 X 1 = 141
Total = 993
Molecular weight of Maleic anhydride (C4 H2O3)
C4 = 4 X 12 = 48
H2 = 34 X 1 = 2
O3 = 3 X 16 = 48
Total = 98
1 mole of Polyisobutylene + 1 mole Maleic anhydride
= Polyisobutylene succinic anhydride
993 + 98 = 1091
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Polyisobutylene – 0.91 Kg2) Maleic anhydride - 0.09 Kg
Stage II: ESTER EMULSION (LAKPOL TP 1050) (PIBSI)
Molecular weight of Polyisobutylene succinic anhydride (C75 H143O3)
C75 = 75 X 12 = 900
H143 = 143 X 1 = 143
O3 = 3 X 16 = 48
Total = 1091
Molecular weight of Tetraethylene pentamine (TEPA) C8 H23 N5
C8 = 8 X 12 = 96
H23 = 23 X 1 = 23
N5 = 5 X 14 = 70
Total = 189
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
21
1 mole Tetraethylene pentamine + 1.51 mole polyisobutylene succinic anhydride + Solvent naphtha heavy aromatic
= LAKPOL TP 1050 + Water of reaction
189 + 1091 X 1.51 + 360 = 2170 + 18 X 1.5
Raw material requirement per kg
3) Polyisobutylene succinic anhydride - 0.76 kg4) Tetraethylene pentamine – 0.09 Kg5) Solvent naphtha,heavy aromatic - 0.17 Kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
22
( 7.0) Blending Chemicals : PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM & DETAIL
Procedure:
1. Charge Cetostearyl alcohol & catalyst to the reaction vessel & heat it to 130-160°c temperature.2. React ethylene oxide maintaining temperature & pressure to achieve required specifications of Cetostearyl
alcohol ethoxylate3. Then cool the product to 50°c , & add slowly phosphorous pnetaoxide maintaining 50-70°c temperature &
maintain the reaction mass till specifications of Lakpol P6 are achieved4. Cool the product & pack in suitable container.
Ethylene oxide
Cetostearyl alcohol
Reaction vessel
Cetostearylalcoholethoxylate
Phosphorouspenta oxide
Packing
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
23
Calculation for the Molecular weight of BLENDING CHEMICALS (LAKPOL P6)
Stage: I Cetostearyl alcohol ethoxylate
Molecular weight of Cetostearyl alcohol C17 H36 O
C17 = 17 X 12 = 204H36 = 36 X 1 = 36O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 256Molecular weight of Ethylene oxide C2 H4 O
C2 = 2 X 12 = 24H4 = 4 X 1 = 4O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 44Molecular weight of Cetostearyl alcohol ethoxylate
Cetostearyl alcohol + 6 mole of ethylene oxide = Cetostearyl alcohol ethoxylate I.e. 256 + (6 X 44) =520
Stage: II LAKPOL P 6 (Phosphorelation of Cetostearyl alcohol ethoxylate)
Molecular weight of Phosphorous penta oxide P2O5
P2 = 2 X 32 = 64O = 5 X 16 = 80
Total = 144Molecular weight of LAKPOL P61 mole Cetostearyl alcohol ethoxylate + 0.36 mole Phosphorous penta oxide = LAKPOL P 6
520 + 0.361 X144 = 572
Raw material requirement per kg
1) Cetostearyl alcohol – 0.447 Kg2) Ethylene oxide - 0.461 Kg3) Phosphorous pentaoxide -0.090 kg
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
24
( 8.0) Block Co-polymer (EOPO) : FLOW DIAGRAM & DETAILS
Procedure:
1. Charge 2-Propyl heptanol & catalyst to the reaction vessel & heat it to 120 -135°c temperature.2. React ethylene oxide & propylene oxide maintaining temperature & pressure to achieve required
specifications ORISURF LF -13. Then cool the product , filter to remove suspended impurities & pack in suitable container.
Propylene oxide Ethylene oxide
2-Propyl heptanol
Reaction vessel
Filtration Packing
KOH catalyst
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
25
Calculation for the Molecular weight EO PO (Orisurf LF-1)
Molecular weight of 2-Propyl heptanol C10 H22 O
C10 = 10 X 12 = 120
H22 = 14 X 1 = 22
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 158
Molecular weight of Ethylene oxide C2 H4 O
C2 = 2 X 12 = 24
H4 = 4 X 1 = 4
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 44
Molecular weight of Propylene oxide C3 H6 O
C3 = 3 X 12 = 36
H6 = 4 X 1 = 6
O = 1 X 16 = 16
Total = 58
Molecular weight of ORISURF LF-1
2- Propyl heptanol + 6.1 mole of ethylene oxide +4.5 mole of Propylene oxide = ORISURF LF -1
I.e. 158 + (6.1 X 44) + (4.5 X 58) = 687.4
Raw material requirement per kg
1) 2-Propyl heptanol – 0.23 Kg2) Ethylene oxide - 0.39 Kg3) Propylene oxide - 0.38
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
26
ANNEXURE: 4RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
The proposed product is widely manufactured and is old and steady products. All the raw materials are easilyavailable indigenously in the local market and some of the raw material is imported. The sources of raw materialsrequired for proposed products are market driven and they will be transported through road. The List of productwise raw material with consumption is mentioned in executive summary.
Marketing area of final products:These products are especially used in Food, Cosmetics, Pharmaceuticals, Textiles, Household Cleaning, IndustrialCleaning, Metal Working, Mining, Lubricants, Oil Fields, Agriculture, Paints and Pigments.
Transport of Raw material and Finish products:Most of the raw materials will be procured by tanker & drums in standard packing by road.Also the product will be packed in drums and will be transported by road/rail and by air for export purpose.There is no much impact on transport of raw material as well as finish product.
DETAILS ON PRODUCT – TRANSPORTATION
Sr.No.
Product Physical State Dispatch Means ofTransportation
1 Esters LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
2 Ethoxylates LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
3 Speciality Chemicals LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
4 Amphoterics LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
5 Propoxylates LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
6 Ester Emulsions LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
7 Blending Chemicals LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
8 EOPO LIQUID IN MS HDPEDRUM
TRUCK ORCONTAINER
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
27
DETAILS ON RAW MATERIAL – TRANSPORTATION
Sr.No.
Substance Physical State Source ofSupply
Means ofTransportation
Distance ofsupplier from
project site(km)
1 2 EH AMINE ( 2 Ethyl HexylAmine)
LIQUID Alkyl Amine TRUCK 250
2 2EHA ( 2 Ethyl HexylAlcohol)
LIQUID PCL Oils TRUCK
3 2 PHA (2 Propyl Heptanol) LIQUID K-L-J- Plasizers TRUCK
4 AEEA (Amine Ethyl Ethaol) LIQUID AKZO Nobel TRUCK
5 C-10 ( Exxal-10) LIQUID Exxon mobil TRUCK
6 C-13 ( Tri Decyl Alcohol) LIQUID KH Neochem TRUCk
7 CASTOR OIL LIQUID Risinash Oil TRUCK
8 COCOAMINE (RM 210) LIQUID Gianergy International TRUCK
9 COCONUT OIL LIQUID N.A. TRUCK
10 DAMPA LIQUID Alkyi Amine TRUCK
11 DCFA ( Distilled CocnutFatty Acid)
LIQUID PT. MuusimasIndonesia.
TRUCK
12 DEA ( Di Ethyl Amine) LIQUID Petronus Chem. TRUCK13 DEG ( Di Ethylene Glycol) LIQUID Crystel India. TRUCK
14 DES (Di ethyl Sulphate) LIQUID Dharmasi Morarji TRUCK
15 DETA ( Di Ethyl Tri Amine) LIQUID BASF TRUCK
16 DMS ( Di Methyl Sulphate) LIQUID Aarti Industriers TRUCK
17 GLYCERINE LIQUID KL- Kepon Oleomas TRUCK
18 HCO ( HydrogenatedCastrol oil)
POWDER Ricinash Oil mill ltd. TRUCK
19 H202 (Hydrogen Peroxide) LIQUID Solvay TRUCK20 IPA (Iso propyl Alcohol) LIQUID Deepak Farstilizers TRUCK21 LAURIC ACID POWDER PT.musim mas TRUCK22 LAURYL ALCOHOL LIQUID Saudi Basic
internationalTRUCK
23 LLP (Light Liquid Paraffin) LIQUID Savita Oil TRUCK24 MALEIC Anhydride POWDER Excel Chem. TRUCK
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
28
25 METHANOL LIQUID N.A. TRUCK26 Caustic Soda Flakes POWDER Meghamani fine chem. TRUCK27 NBA ( Normal Butanol) LIQUID PCI Oil CONTAINER28 OLEIC ACID LIQUID American Chemie TRUCK29 OLEYL AMINE LIQUID Akzo Nobel TRUCK30 P2O5 ( Phosphorus
Pentoxide)POWDER Prasol Chem. TRUCK
31 PALMITIC ACID POWDER PT-Nubika TRUCK32 PHENOL LIQUID SI Group TRUCK33 PIB (Poly Iso butanol) LIQUID Duleim Corpo. CONTAINER34 POP (Para Octyl Phenol) POWDER Maruzen petro TRUCK35 PPA (Poly Phospheric Acid LIQUID Prasol TRUCK36 PPG 1000 LIQUID N.A. TRUCK37 ACRYLIC ACID LIQUID Formosa Plastics TRUCK38 SAS 60 LIQUID Weylchem TRUCK39 SMBS ( Sodium Meta Bi
sulphate)POWDER Hans Chem, TRUCK
40 SMCA (Sodium MonoChloro aceted)
POWDER CABB Kamavti Rasyan. TRUCK
41 SORBITOL LIQUID Kasyap sweetners TANKER42 SOYA FATTY ACID LIQUID Ruchi Soya TRUCK43 SOYA OIL LIQUID N.A. TRUCK44 STERIC ACID POWDER Jocil ltd. TRUCK45 STERIC ALCOHOL N.A. TRUCK46 STYRENE MONOMER LIQUID Supreme Petrochem TRUCK/TANKER47 SULPHAMIC ACID POWDER Guljan Industries TRUCK48 TEPA (Tri Ethyl Propyl
Amine)LIQUID Delamine B.N. TRUCK
49 TMP ( Tri Methyl Propane) POWDER Lanxess TRUCK50 WAX 392 POWDER Honeywell TRUCK51 BAL 7733 LIQUID Genotek TRUCK52 ARROW 100L LIQUID Genotek TRUCK53 WAX 629 Honeywell TRUCK54 DEEA ( Di Ethyl Ethanol
Amine)LIQUID Balaji Amines TRUCK
55 Ethylene Oxide LIQUID Reliance Ind. TANKER56 Propylene Oxide. LIQUID Expanded. CONTAINER
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
29
SAFE STORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS
No
Name of theRaw
Materials
Quantity stored,MT/Day
BP. 0C MP0C
Placeof its
Storage
Stateoperatingpressuretemperat
ure
Possibletype ofhazards
Controlmeasuresprovided
Required
Actual
1 EthyleneOxide
7 7 10.7 StorageTankArea
3.5 Kg/cm2 Underinert N2Purging10-150C
Explosion& fireHealtheffect
Keep away fromHeat, Ground &
bonding allequipment,
Chilling watercirculation,
Using adequatePPE
2 PropyleneOxide
7 3 34.2 -112 StorageTankArea
3.5 Kg/cm2 Underinert N2Purging10-150C
Explosion& fireHealtheffect
Keep away fromHeat, Ground &
bonding allequipment,
Chilling watercirculation,
Using adequatePPE,
3 Phenol 20 5 CoolDry
ventilated area
High Toxic,Corrosive,
Combustible
Avoid skin, eyecontact &
incompatiblematerial
4 PhosphorusPentaoxide
0.2 0.1 360 580 DrumCoolDry
ventilated are
Ambient Corrosive,Reactive
Store away fromwater &
incompatiblematerial, Avoid
contact withskin, Using
adequate PPE
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
30
ANNEXURE: 6Availability of water its source, Energy/power required and its source. Water Requirement
WATER CONSUMPTION (M3/DAY)
Sr.No.
Particulars Existing Proposed After Proposedexpansion
A Industrial Purpose 32.0 6.0 38.0A1 Used in process as dilution waterA2 Floor/equipment/container
washingA3 ProcessB Cooling/Boiler 30.0 0 30.0C Domestic purpose 3.0 2.0 5.0D Gardening 7.0 0 7.0
Total 72.0 8.0 80.0
Energy Requirements and its source:Sr.No.
Particulars Existing Proposed Source
1 Steamrequirement
1500 Kg 2500 Kg The additional steam will be generatedfrom existing boiler.
2 Heat 200,000 Kcal 400,000 Kcal The additional heat will be generatedfrom existing Thermic fluid heater.
Power Requirements and its source:Sr.No.
Particulars Existing Proposed Source
1 Power –Electricity requirement 225 KVA 200 KVAWill be sourced from
MSEDCL.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
31
Permission letter from irrigation department for water supply.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
32
ANNEXURE: 7Quantity of waste to be generated (liquid and solid) and scheme for their Management/disposal.
Quantity of Waste Water (liquid waste) generation and its management :
Sr.No.
Particulars Existing Proposed After Proposedexpansion
A Industrial Purpose 20.0 2.0 22.0A1 Used in process as dilution waterA2 Floor/equipment/container
washingA3 ProcessB Domestic purpose 1.5 1.5 3.0
Total 21.5 3.5 25.0Mode of Disposal 0
A ETP to CETP 20.0 2.0 22.0B Septic tank/soak pit 1.5 1.5 3.0
The generated waste water will be treated in effluent treatment plant (ETP). The details of the existingtreatment plant is as given below :
Existing Effluent Treatment Plant
TECHNICAL NOTE ON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANTFOR
M/S. LAKELAND CHEMICALS LTD. MADAP1.0 Name Of The Company : M/s. Lakeland Chemicals Ltd. Madap
2.0 Raw waste Quantity for Design : 20 m3/day
3.0 Raw waste Quality :
Sr. No. Parameter Value1 pH 62 Oil & Grease 100 – 200 mg/l3 Suspended solids 800 mg/l4 Dissolved solids 700 mg/l5 3 day’s 27oC BOD 1900 mg/l6 C.O.D. 8500 mg/l7 Chlorides 21 mg/l8 Sulfates 35 mg/l
4.0 Treated water standards as per MPCB Consent.
Sr. No. Parameter Value1 pH 5.5 to 9.02 Oil & Grease < 10 mg/l3 Suspended solids < 100 mg/l4 3 day’s 27oC BOD < 100 mg/l5 C.O.D. < 500 mg/l6 Chlorides < 1000 mg/l7 Sulfates < 600 mg/l
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
33
5.0 Details of ETP process :
The effluent treatment plant receives two streams viz. Ethylene Oxide(EO) and Non Ethylene Oxidecondensates (NEO). These are received separately. For each stream following units are provided,
1. Bar screen to remove large objects ( 300 wide x 500 long and equipped with screens having 20 mmopenings),
2. Oil and Grease traps : 2.4m x 0.3m x0.5m total depth.3. Equalization tanks,
For EO stream : 17 m3 capacity
For Non EO stream : 10 m3 capacity
Effluent after equalization tanks is processed through four stages,
Stage I - Primary Treatment,
Primary treatment comprises of Dissolved Air Floatation unit to remove suspended solids and floatingsubstances like oil etc. This also helps in reducing BOD and COD by about 30 to 40%, thereby reducing loadon Activated sludge process.
Stage II - 1st stage Activated sludge process,
After primary treatment, effluent is sent to an aeration tank for biological treatment with Activated SludgeProcess (ASP). This comprises of following inits,
- An aeration tank equipped with fine air diffusers & Twin lobe blowers.- Secondary settling tank, and- Return sludge pumps.
Using microbial culture, effluent will be degraded and reduced to minerals and water. Aeration tankcontents are sent to settling tank for sludge separation. Settled sludge will be recycled back to Aerationtank, where as clear treated effluent will be sent to Second stage of ASP.
In the 1st stage we expect about 70% reduction of BOD, COD etc.
Stage III - 2nd stage Activated sludge process,
Second stage of ASP is exactly similar to 1st stage and provides overall 90% BOD, COD reduction.
Stage IV - Tertiary treatment plant.
This comprises of Duel Media sand and Activated carbon filters.
Though after treatment all the parameters specified by MPCB are conformed, still effluent will be passed
through a Duel Media and Activated Carbon Filter to ensure better quality of treatment at all the times.
Sludge : Sludge is sent to sludge drying beds for dewatering.
Disposal : Treated effluent meeting MPCB standards is used within factory premises for gardening purpose.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
34
6.0 The stage wise reduction of various parameters is as follows,
Sr. No. Parameter Value After
DAF
After 1st
stage ASP
After 2nd stage
of ASP
After
Tertiary
MPCB
Limits
1 pH 6 7 6.5 to 7 6.5 to 7 6.5 to 7 5.5 to 9
2 Oil & Grease 200 mg/l < 10 < 10 < 10 BDL BDL
3 Suspended solids 800 mg/l < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 100
4 Dissolved solids 700 mg/l 700 700 700 700 < 2100
5 3 day’s 27oC BOD 1900 mg/l 1330 399 < 40 < 30 < 100
6 C.O.D. 8500 mg/l 5950 1785 < 200 < 100 < 250
7 Chlorides 21 mg/l 21 21 21 21 < 600
8 Sulfates 35 mg/l 35 35 35 35 < 1000
7.0 Treatment Plant units.
Sr. No. Name of the unit (Tanks) Nos. Dimensions
1 Bar screen chambers 2 300 wide x 500 long
2 Oil & Grease chambers 2 2.4m x 0.3m x0.5m total depth
3 E.O. Equalization tank 1 3.5mx3.16mx1.53m swd
4 Non E.O. Equalization Tank 1 2.6m x 3.36 x1.14m depth
5 Dissolved Air floatation unit 1 2000 dia.
6 Aeration tank Stage I 1 2.4m x1.82m x 3.5m
7 Settling tank I 1 1.2m x1.82m x 1.76m swd
8 Aeration tank II 1 2.4m x1.82mx 3.3m swd.
9 Settling tank II 1 1.2m x1.82mx1.76m swd
10 Treated water tank 1 10 m3 capacity
11 Pressure filter 1 300 diax1800 HOS
12 Activated Carbon Filter 1 300 diax1800 HOS
13 Sludge drying beds 3 2mx2m
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
35
Flow Diagram of ETP
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
36
Proposed Effluent Treatment Plant for additional effluent
The existing ETP will be upgraded by installing the UASB tank as per following.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
37
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
38
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
39
Proposed ETP layout
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
40
PERMISSION FROM CETP FOR DISPOSAL OF EFFLUENT
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
41
Quantity of Solid Waste generation and its management :
Sr. No. Type of hazardouswaste
Category Quantity, TPA Place ofStorage
Disposal
Existing Afterproposedexpansion
1 Waste from ETP 34.3 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF2 Used oil 5.1 0.06 1.5 Drum Sell to registered
re-refiner3 Waste & Residue 23.1 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
42
MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE OF CHWTSDF, TALOJA
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
43
ANNEXURE: 8
A schematic representation of the feasibility drawing
Proposed Activity:The proposed expansion project involves the
production of "Existing products (Synthetic OrganicChemicals"
Submission of Form-1 andPre-Feasibility Report &
Draft TOR
Resource requirmentsRaw Material : Sourced from Manufacturer / Traders of the same.Land :Expansion in Existing premises ,At Vill.Madapwater: will be sourced through Patalganga river.Power: power will be sourced through MSEDCL.Fuel : Local delear
Env. Mgt. Plan (EMP)Air Pollution Control Measures: Air Pollution contol system will beprovided due to Boiler/Thermopack emissionsWater Pollution : ETPGreenbelt Area: 33% of the Total Area will be developed.Health & Safety measures will be followed properly.
Domestic: Will be disposed off through Soak pit/ Septic Tank
Industrial: Industrial wastewater will be discharged through CETPFlue Gas emissions: Adequate chimney height will be provided.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
43
ANNEXURE: 8
A schematic representation of the feasibility drawing
Type of IndustryExisting unit mfg. of "Synthrtic Organic
Chemicals"
Type of cataegory as per EIAnotification
(Catagery -5(f)-A
Proposed Activity:The proposed expansion project involves the
production of "Existing products (Synthetic OrganicChemicals"
Submission of Form-1 andPre-Feasibility Report &
Draft TOR
Resource requirmentsRaw Material : Sourced from Manufacturer / Traders of the same.Land :Expansion in Existing premises ,At Vill.Madapwater: will be sourced through Patalganga river.Power: power will be sourced through MSEDCL.Fuel : Local delear
Env. Mgt. Plan (EMP)Air Pollution Control Measures: Air Pollution contol system will beprovided due to Boiler/Thermopack emissionsWater Pollution : ETPGreenbelt Area: 33% of the Total Area will be developed.Health & Safety measures will be followed properly.
Domestic: Will be disposed off through Soak pit/ Septic Tank
Industrial: Industrial wastewater will be discharged through CETPFlue Gas emissions: Adequate chimney height will be provided.
Presentation before EAC for TOR
Preparation of EIA, Publicconsultation & final presentation
before EAC for EC
Site location :The company located at Plot
No.63,B,6A,6B,RasayaniRoad,Vill Madap,
Tq.Khalapur,Dist . Raigad
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
43
ANNEXURE: 8
A schematic representation of the feasibility drawing
Type of IndustryExisting unit mfg. of "Synthrtic Organic
Chemicals"
Presentation before EAC for TOR
Preparation of EIA, Publicconsultation & final presentation
before EAC for EC
Site location :The company located at Plot
No.63,B,6A,6B,RasayaniRoad,Vill Madap,
Tq.Khalapur,Dist . Raigad
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
44
ANNEXURE: 9Topography Map of Madap
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
45
ANNEXURE: 10
Land ownership documents
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
46
ANNEXURE: 12
Site map with green belt planning
For Green Belt Development, as per the layout plan the company proposing 33% green belt of the total land, i.e.,17575 sq. mt. The company shall develop green belt along the periphery of the proposed site and in commonpremises available outside the company premises.
While selecting the plants species to be grown in the green belt zone, following points will be taken into account:
1. Climatic condition and soil characteristics of the region.2. The air pollution emitted by the industry – gaseous and particulate matter. Plant interacts with both gaseous
and particulate pollutants and to a great extent absorbs them and thus, removes them from theatmosphere.
3. Characteristics of plants including shapes of crowns considered necessary for effecting absorption ofpollutant gases and removal of dust particles.
4. Height of the plants should not be too high to be lethal.5. For absorbance of gases, the duration of the foliage should be longer.6. Vegetation controls soil erosion rates significantly. The decrease of water erosion rates with increasing
vegetation cover is exponential. This review reveals that the decrease in water erosion rates with increasingroot mass is also exponential. Plant species having good root system are selected, so that soil erosion can bechecked.
Area Statement for Existing & Proposed
Sr. No Particulars Area in m2
Existing Proposed Total
1.0 Total plot Area 17575 0 17575
1.1 Production Plant ( 1 & 2) 770.50 250.00 1020.501.2 Office & lab area 232.00 0 232.001.3 Store 210.00 210.00 420.001.4 Green Belt 6019.97 2000.00 8019.971.5 Raw materials & other Storage 520.00 0 520.001.6 Tank Farm 197.00 0 197.001.7 Utility 120.00 0 120.001.8 Boiler & Briquette shed area 406.00 0 406.001.9 ETP & solid waste storage area 250.00 50 300.00
1.10 Toilet block 60.00 0 60.001.11 Open space 8789.53 0 6279.53
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
47
Site plan showing for Green belt development
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
48
ANNEXURE: 13
Solid and Hazardous Waste Generation & Disposal Method – After Proposed Expansion Quantity of Solid Wastegeneration and its management:
Sr. No. Type of hazardouswaste
Category Quantity, TPA Place ofStorage
Disposal
Existing Afterproposedexpansion
1 Waste from ETP 34.3 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF2 Used oil 5.1 0.06 1.5 Drum Sell to registered
re-refiner3 Waste & Residue 23.1 0.6 1.2 HW storage CHWTSDF
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
49
ANNEXURE: 14Estimated project cost along with the analysis in terms of economic viability of the project.
Plant & Machinery, Pipeline & Fittings, Electrical Installation, Safety systems, etc. are the major heads considered inthe Capital Cost Projection for the proposed expansion project. Environment Protection has also been considered inplanning the Cost Projection, which will include Green belt development, safety systems, etc.
Capital Cost Projection
Sr. No. Particulars Cost in Rs.(crore)for Existing
Proposed Total
1.0 Land 17575 m2 5.0 0 5.0
2.0 Building 8.0 7.1 15.10
3.0 Plant & Machinery 17.0 12.25 29.25
4.0 Electrical installation 2.0 2.15 4.15
5.0 Environmental ManagementSystem
2.52 2.55 5.07
5.0 Total Project Cost 34.52 24.05 58.57
Project viability:
Sr. No. PARTICULARS AMOUNT IN Cr.
1 Proposed Sale 30.25
2 Raw Material Cost 9.82
3 Power & Fuel 3.25
4 Labor Cost 6.76
5 Environmental Management System 0.625
6 Maintenance Cost 1.37
7 Selling, packing & Office Expenses 2.20
8 Proposed Profit 6.225
The company will provide budgetary provision for the recurring expenses for environmental issues while planningthe allocation of funds during the annual budgetary planning.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
50
Recurring Cost per annum
Sr. No. ComponentProposed
(Rs. in Lacs/annum)
1. Environment & Safety Management System 50
2. Greenbelt Maintenance 2.5
3. Solid waste Disposal 10
Total 62.5
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
51
ANNEXURE: 15DETAILS OF AIR POLLUTION & ITS CONTROL MEASURES AT EXISTING & AFTER PROPOSED EXPANSION
The utility emissions will be from the Thermopac (1 No.) of 600,000 Kcal/Hr capacity & Steam Boiler ( 1 No.) of 4Tons/Hr Capacity. Briquettes/FO as fuel will be used in the Thermopac & Steam Boiler. Also D.G. Set of 350 KVAcapacity to use in case of power failure and HSD is used as a fuel.
From the existing plant TPM & SO2 is generated. Cyclone separator is provided to arrest the dust particles andCombine stack of 15 M height and id of 800 MM at Bottom and 700 MM at Top is provided to curb the pollution asper MPCB guidelines. Details of which are as under;
Sr. No. Particulars Existing After ProposedExpansion
Pollutioncontrol
equipment
Remarks
1.0 Capacity of Thermopac 600,000 Kcal/Hr 0Cyclone
separatorand 15 M
height stackprovided.
ExistingThermopacwill be used
for fullcapacity tomeet theadditional
requirement.
1.1 Fuel Used Briquettes/Furnaceoil
Briquettes/Furnaceoil
1.2 Fuel Consumption 3 MT/day 5 MT/day1.3 APC provided Cyclone separator Cyclone separator1.4 Height/dia of chimney 15 meters 15 meters
2.0 Capacity of Steam Boiler 4 TPH 0 ExistingBoiler will beused for fullcapacity tomeet theadditional
requirement
2.1 Fuel Used Briquettes/Furnaceoil
Briquettes/Furnaceoil
2.2 Fuel Consumption 3 MT/day 5 MT/day2.3 APC provided Cyclone separator Cyclone separator2.4 Height/dia of chimney 15 meters 15 meters
3.0 Capacity of D G set 350 KVA (Standby) 03.1 Fuel Used HSD HSD3.2 Fuel Consumption 100 liters/hr 100 lits/hr
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
52
Photograph of existing system
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
53
ANNEXURE: 16
NOISE POLLUTION
Basically, being a chemical factory, noise pollution chances are form air compressor, DG Sets,Termopac/Boiler room etc.
The company has proposed following steps for controlling noise pollution. There will be a regular program of preventive maintenance of preventive maintenance of all the
mechanical equipment, which is meticulously followed. Anti-vibrating pads & acoustic enclosure shall be provided to DG Set and compressors. Separate cabin shall be provided to the DG Set and boiler. The operators working in the DG Set and boiler area shall be provided earmuffs.
EXPECTED NOISE LEVEL
Sr. No. LOCATION NOISE LEVEL
Day Time Night Time
1. Near boiler 70.1 dB (A) 69.3 dB (A)
3. Near D.G. set room 74.4 dB (A) 69.2 dB (A)
4. Near Gate no 2 71.3 dB (A) 67.1 dB (A)
5. Backside near compound wall 66.8 dB (A) 62.6 dB (A)
6. In side production plant 67.3 dB (A) 65.5 dB (A)
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
54
ANNEXURE: 17
RISK ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction: Name of the Project : M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd Address : Plot no 63,6A,6B, Rasayani Road, Vill. Madap, Tq. Khalapur, Dist. Raigad.( Maharashtra)
Location:
The project is located at village Madap which is very well connected to National Highway no 4, Central Railways. Andthe nearest air port (Mumbai) and port are 60 KM away from the project site by road.Objective:
The proposed project provides a potential growth opportunity for the already running business of the company. Thecompany is already engaged in the business of manufacturing of Specality Chemicals. The project would decreasethe overall import and also save the foreign currency. Products are now well established and acceptable in the localand international markets.Additional capacities of product range required over & above our existing capacities, as the company expect stronggrowth to the extent of 40-50%.The company intends to expand the existing Specality Chemicals products & expand the capacity of the plant. Theseproducts are especially used in Food, Cosmetics, Pharmaceuticals, Textiles, Household Cleaning, Industrial Cleaning,Metal Working, Mining, Lubricants, Oil Fields, Agriculture, Paints and Pigments.
Project:
As explained above this project is having objects to expand the Specality Chemicals product capacity with bestquality and needs of the markets today and tomorrow. Hence all factors going into the making of quality product areconsidered prior to implementing the project.
The said products intend to manufacture in the existing plot located at notified industrial area.
The group therefore intends to focus on Health & safety. As part of its efforts to enhance the overall safety in theplant as well as generate Health & safety awareness, M/S Lakeland Chemicals ( India ) Ltd has entrusted experiencedsafety auditor to conduct Risk assessment for the proposed expansion project.
Objective:The objectives of the risk assessment
Assessing risk level due to the operation.
Identification of the risk mitigation measures to bring the potential risk within acceptable range.
To suggest general safety improvement measures for facility.
To help generate accident free hours in turn increase production.
To identify emergency scenarios and suggest mitigation measures.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
55
Methodology:The risk broadly carried out as follows:
Identification of hazardous or HAZID this involves a systematic approach to identify possible hazardous situation. Thehazard identification involves study of storage of the different chemicals and also storage quantity and theircompatibility with each other.
Study of process hazardous this covers assessing the hazard in various process reactions which can be due torunaway potential of reaction, incompatibility of raw materials etc. the study of process reactions is done using aninternational database of process reactions which is help in determining the hazard potential of reaction.
Organogram:The management has given proper status & importance to health, safety & environment area.
Health & Safety Policy:The management has already prepared the health & safety policy & display at certain places & circulates it to theworkers.
Safety Manuals:The management has prepared the safety manual, safety booklet etc. for enhance safety culture in the company.
Onsite emergency plan:The management has already prepared & upgraded the on site emergency plan. It is placed and focused on all theemergencies those are likely to arise in the factory.
Disclosure of information to general public:The management has prepared the booklet on disclosure of information to general public, workers and authorities.
MSDS:The MSDS of hazardous chemicals is prepared & available with the management.
Instruction boardsThe various instruction boards, cautionary notices, etc. are displayed at different locations.
Occupational health:Medical check up of all the employees carry out periodically by qualified medical officer and health records aremaintained in prescribed format.
Inspection & maintenance:The frequency for various activities in the plant, process & storage is maintain with attentively by the managementas per following.
Daily Inspection: Critical equipment, controls, indicators, levels, switches, settings, drain valves, leakages, storagetanks.
Weekly: Inspection & maintenance of rotary equipments.
Monthly: Al interlocks
Quarterly: All indicators alarms, trip & control
Half yearly: Ultrasonic thickness gauge, earthing check
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
56
Annual: All valves, safety valves, painting of vessels, pipe lines.
Accident Record Keeping:Accident investigation format is available. Records of investigated accident are maintained in this format. Reportingof accidents shall be maintained in prescribed form No. 29.
Safety training programme:Safety training programme is organized for all level of workers, supervisors including contract workers.
Safety department:A safety department is headed by Manager (Safety) and one safety officer assisting him.
Safety features and emergency capabilities:Some of the main features include; Compliance of statutory rules and regulations such as factory act and their rulesas applicable like manufacture, storage and import of hazardous chemicals (MSIHC), gas cylinder rules, hazardouswaste ( Management & handling rules) 1989 as amended environment protection act.
The plant is carrying a high tension connection from Gujarat Electricity Board. The plant is also be kept powered by DG set in the event of schedules owner cut by GEB.
All liquid raw materials from underground and above ground tanks are taken to reactors via vessels by pump. Pumpmotors and reactors are properly earth.
Training regarding safety awareness, hazardous material handling, storage and use, contract workers are trained inSOPs.
The safety department are look after the process person.
Normal as well as emergency communication facilities including sirens, phone, intercom, internet etc. are provided.
Portable fire extinguishers are provided throughout the plant and these are carefully placed near the hazard areas.These are maintained and also tested periodically.
The company is maintaining the records of annual pre medical and periodic medical examinations.
Hazard posed by hazardous chemicals:The hazardous posed by the chemicals could be one or more of the following.
Fire/explosion involving flammable liquids.Release of toxic liquids vapour that may be fatal for employees and/or surroundings population from storage orprocess.
Injuries to employees due to falling of objects, materials, slip and falls, electric hazards etc.
Exposure of employees to corrosive/irritating chemicals during manual handling.
These hazards need to be minimized through good design, operations and maintenance practice and through strongsafety culture building.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
57
ANNEXURE: 18ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN: EMP:
Based on the environmental impact matrix and considering the proposed product mix, the following EnvironmentalManagement Plan is suggested.
1. The unit should properly equalize the normal effluent and taken for treatment and disposal.2. ETP should be operated properly.3. Avenues for water recycling is to be evaluated and if possible, to be implemented.4. Monitoring of emissions to be done regularly5. Hazardous wastes temporary storage is to be properly maintained and stock should be minimum.6. Proper labeling on Hazardous Waste containers to avoid mishap.7. The company should make continuous efforts in waste minimization.8. Noise monitoring to be done regularly and efforts should be made to reduce them.9. For the equipments and pipelines, leakage detection and repair is to be scheduled to minimize fugitive
emissions.10. The company should continue implementation and improvisation of EMS.11. The tree plantation program should be continued with focus on developing green belt along the
periphery of the unit.
ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PLAN:
SAMPLES PARAMETERS FREQUENCY
RAW/TreatedEFFLUENT
24 Hrs.comp. pH, COD, SS, Oil & Grease PER DAY
ETP Sludge L.O.D. PER MONTH
Third party monitoring pH, COD, BOD, SS, TDS,Oil & Grease,Chlorides,Sulpahtes Ambient air monitoring as per NAQS Stack monitoring & Noise level monitoring
Once in month
MPCB SAMPLE - As & when
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN: DMP
1. HAZOP study has to be conducted before setting up of the expansion plant.2. Onsite emergency plan has been up graded and mock drills are regularly conducted.3. Emergency Response Team (ERT) activities are continued.4. Training is imparted regularly to all employees on safety and health aspects of chemicals handling.
Prefeasibility Report M/s. Lakeland Chemicals (India) Ltd.
58
ANNEXURE: 19
SOCIO - ECONOMIC IMPACTS
1) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
The manpower requirement for the proposed expansion is expected to generate some permanent jobs and
secondary jobs for the operation and maintenance of plant. This will increase direct / indirect employment
opportunities and ancillary business development to some extent for the local population. This phase is expected to
create a beneficial impact on the local socio-economic environment.
2) INDUSTRIES
Required raw materials and skilled and unskilled laborers will be utilized maximum from the local area. The
increasing industrial activity will boost the commercial and economical status of the locality, to some extent.
3) PUBLIC HEALTH
The company regularly examines, inspects and tests its emission from sources to make sure that the emission is
below the permissible limit. Hence, there will not be any significant change in the status of sanitation and the
community health of the area, as sufficient measures have been taken and proposed under the EMP.
4) TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION
Since the existing factory is having proper linkage for the transport and communication, the development of this
project will not cause any additional impact.
In brief, as a result of the expansion there will be no adverse impact on sanitation, communication and community
health, as sufficient measures have been proposed to be taken under the EMP. The proposed expansion is not
expected to make any significant change in the existing status of the socio - economic environment of this region.