Practice patterns in high-risk bariatric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
Transcript of Practice patterns in high-risk bariatric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
Practice patterns in high-risk bariatric venous thromboembolismprophylaxis
Howard I. Pryor II • Adam Singleton •
Elissa Lin • Paul Lin • Khashayar Vaziri
Received: 11 April 2012 / Accepted: 30 July 2012 / Published online: 6 October 2012
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Abstract
Background In the morbidly obese population that
undergoes bariatric surgery, venous thromboembolism
(VTE) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality.
Certain factors place a patient at higher risk for VTE. No
consensus exists on VTE screening or prophylaxis for the
high-risk patient. This report describes the results of a
survey on VTE screening and prophylaxis patterns in high-
risk bariatric surgery.
Methods Members of the Society of American Gastro-
intestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were queried
on factors that identified bariatric patients as high risk for
VTE and on routine screening and prophylaxis practices.
This included mechanical and chemical prophylaxis,
duration of therapy, and use of inferior vena cava (IVC)
filters.
Results Of the 385 surgeons who responded to the survey,
81 % were bariatric surgeons, and the majority managed
more than 50 cases annually. One or more of the following
risk factors qualified patients as high risk: history of VTE,
hypercoagulable status, body mass index (BMI) exceeding
55 kg/m2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) lower
than 60 mmHg, and severe immobility. Preoperative
screening of patients for VTE was practiced routinely by
56 % of the surgeons, and 92.4 % used preoperative che-
moprophylaxis. The most common agent used preopera-
tively was heparin (48 %), and Lovenox was most
commonly used postoperatively (49 %). Whereas 48 % of
the patients discontinued chemoprophylaxis at discharge,
43 % continued chemoprophylaxis as outpatients, and
47 % routinely screened for VTE postoperatively. Use of
IVC filters was routine for 28 % of the patients, who most
commonly removed them after 1–3 months.
Conclusions This study describes current practice pat-
terns of VTE screening and prophylaxis in high-risk bari-
atric surgery. Nearly all surgeons agree on risk factors that
qualify patients as high risk, but only half routinely screen
patients preoperatively. Preoperative VTE chemoprophy-
laxis is used by nearly all surgeons, but the duration of
therapy varies. Use of IVC filters is not routine, and
postoperative screening was performed by less than half of
the respondents. An understanding of current practice
patterns yields insight into the rates of VTE and shows
variability in the need for evidence-based prophylaxis and
standardized screening.
Keywords Bariatric � Obesity � Pulmonary � Vascular
Approximately 32.2 % of adult men and 35.5 % of adult
women are considered obese, and in 2009, almost 220,000
bariatric surgeries were performed in the United States
[1, 2]. In the morbidly obese population that undergoes
either open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery, venous
thromboembolism (VTE) is the leading cause of morbidity
and mortality. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary
embolism (PE) are major complications of bariatric sur-
gery, with nearly 50 % of all deaths due to PE [3]. The
increasing number of obese individuals coupled with the
increased number of bariatric surgeries performed each
year makes VTE an ever more important pathology.
The risk of VTE is faced by all patients who undergo
bariatric surgery. However, several other factors place a
patient at an even higher risk for the development of DVT/
H. I. Pryor II � A. Singleton � E. Lin � P. Lin � K. Vaziri (&)
Department of Surgery, The George Washington University,
2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 6B, Washington,
DC 20037, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848
DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2521-z
and Other Interventional Techniques
PE. The role of obesity as an independent risk factor for
VTE is debated. Recent studies indicate that obesity places
patients at a higher risk for VTE [4–7], and in addition to
obese status, numerous other risk factors have been iden-
tified including a history of DVT/PE, a known history of a
hypercoagulable disorder, severe immobility, estrogen
medication, and advanced age [5, 8, 9]. This suggests that
all bariatric surgery patients are at increased risk.
A study that surveyed members of the American Society
for Bariatric Surgery in 2000 demonstrated that 86 % of
the patients who had surgery performed by bariatric sur-
geons were considered to be at high risk for VTE [10].
However, the specific factors that place an obese patient in
the high-risk category were not elucidated, and since then,
no consensus has been formulated.
Due to the silent nature of VTE and the difficulty
establishing a diagnosis of DVT/PE before the onset of
symptoms, prophylaxis against VTE is paramount. A
variety of treatment regimens for prophylaxis of VTE have
been proposed. The majority of studies describe some form
of pharmaceutic treatment coupled with the use of
mechanical compression devices or mechanical compres-
sion devices alone [10–14]. However, no universally
established protocol exists specifically for the high-risk
bariatric patient.
We report the results of a survey encompassing mem-
bers of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endo-
scopic Surgeons (SAGES) who perform bariatric surgery.
The respondents were asked to identify factors that put
bariatric patients at high risk for VTE. The respondents
also were asked to report the prophylactic treatment regi-
mens they used to prevent DVT/PE in the high-risk bari-
atric patient group.
Materials and methods
Members of SAGES were contacted and asked to complete
an online survey. The survey consisted of 26 questions
regarding their current practices. The surgeons were asked
to identify whether they performed bariatric surgery, their
approach, and the total number of cases they managed
annually. They were further queried on the preoperative
risk factors they thought identified patients at high risk for
VTE. Routine preoperative screening methods and pro-
phylaxis patterns among high-risk patients were queried,
including mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis.
Members were asked to identify the chemoprophylactic
agent together with initiation and duration of treatment.
Their use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and postop-
erative screening also was queried. The results are descri-
bed as percentages of completed surveys.
Results
Of the 385 surgeons who responded to the survey, 313
(81 %) reported themselves to be bariatric surgeons. The
majority of the respondents were from the United States
(75.8 %). They were stratified into three groups based on
the number of bariatric cases they managed annually: fewer
than 50 cases (25.6 %), 51–100 cases (31.6 %), or more
than 100 cases (42.8 %). Most of those surveyed (98.7 %)
routinely performed bariatric procedures laparoscopically.
The respondents were asked about their practice patterns
with regard to preoperative, operative, and postoperative
VTE prophylaxis for high-risk patients.
Preoperative risk factors
The respondents identified the following individual factors
as qualifying their patients to be considered at high risk for
VTE: history of DVT/PE (99.7 %), known hypercoagula-
ble status (99.7 %), severe immobility (98.6 %), body mass
index (BMI) exceeding 55 kg/m2 (88.6 %), and partial
pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) lower than 60 mmHg
(65.9 %). A history of DVT/PE was identified by 69.9 % of
respondents as the most significant single factor, followed
by known hypercoagulable status (17.8 %), severe immo-
bility (9.6 %), BMI exceeding 55 kg/m2 (1.4 %), and PaO2
lower than 60 mmHg (1.4 %) (Fig. 1). Nearly half of those
surveyed (47.7 %) considered that three or more of these
Fig. 1 The most important
single factor for determining
VTE risk for bariatric patients
844 Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848
123
factors placed a patient at high risk for VTE compared with
7 % who considered high risk to be indicated by two fac-
tors. For 44.4 %, only one factor was necessary to identify
a patient at high risk, whereas 1 % thought none of these
factors placed a patient at high risk for VTE.
More than half of the surgeons (56 %) routinely
screened high-risk patients preoperatively for DVT:
33.1 % by clinical exam alone and 20.9 % with routine
ultrasound. As reported, 46 % did not routinely screen
high-risk bariatric patients for DVT. Only 23.2 % of the
respondents routinely screened patients for previously
unidentified hypercoagulable status.
Routine preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis was
applied by 92.4 % of the respondents (Fig. 2), with 48 %
using unfractionated heparin, 33.4 % using Lovenox,
2.6 % using Fondaparinux, and 8.3 % using another anti-
coagulant. As reported, 28.1 % of the surgeons routinely
used retrievable IVC filters preoperatively for high-risk
bariatric patients, 0.3 % routinely used permanent filters,
and 71.5 % did not routinely use IVC filters for high-risk
patients.
Operative and postoperative prophylaxis
Intraoperatively, 96.3 % of respondents placed sequential
compression devices (SCD) on high-risk patients. As
reported, 15 % used additional intraoperative chemical
prophylaxis beyond the preoperative dose, with 7.3 %
using additional heparin, 4.3 % using Lovenox, 0.7 %
using Fondaparinux, and 2.7 % using other agents.
Postoperatively, 91.6 % of the surgeons used SCDs on
their high-risk patients, with 97 % also using chemical
prophylaxis. The most commonly used postoperative che-
moprophylactic agent was Lovenox (49.5 %), followed by
heparin (33 %), other agents (9.1 %), and Fondaparinux
(5.4 %).
Postoperative chemoprophylaxis was started most
commonly on postoperative day 0 (70 %), followed by
postoperative day 1 (27.3 %). Chemical prophylaxis was
discontinued at discharge in most cases (48.5 %). How-
ever, 43.8 % of the surgeons continued postoperative
chemoprophylaxis for outpatients. The most common
chemoprophylactic agent used for outpatients was Lovenox
(39.7 %). The most common durations of outpatient ther-
apy were 2 to 4 weeks (40.1 %) and fewer than 2 weeks
(20.2 %).
Routine use of IVC filters for high-risk bariatric patients
was reported by 28.1 % of the respondents, and 51.2 % of
the surgeons routinely discharged patients using IVC filters
coupled with chemoprophylaxis. The most common agent
used was Lovenox (36.4 %), followed by other agents
(8.8 %), heparin (3.7 %), and Fondaparinux (2.4 %). The
most common duration of therapy was 2–4 weeks, fol-
lowed by fewer than 2 weeks. The IVC filters were most
commonly removed 30–90 days postoperatively (55.2 %).
The remaining filters were removed after 90 days (23.2 %)
or within 30 days (21.5 %).
Discussion
A significant percentage of morbidly obese bariatric
patients are described as high risk by surgeons, but no
consensus exists regarding which risk factors or what
number of risk factors are required by physicians to iden-
tify a patient as high risk. Our study sought to identify
these factors and also to describe current practice patterns
regarding screening and the use of chemoprophylaxis and
IVC filters.
Among the risk factors identified for considering patients at
high risk (BMI [ 55 kg/m2, history of DVT/PE, hypercoag-
ulable status, severe immobility, and PaO2 \ 60 mmHg), the
majority of respondents considered a history of DVT/PE as the
Fig. 2 Routine chemical prophylaxis for high-risk bariatric patients
Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848 845
123
most important single risk factor. Whereas 44 % of surgeons
needed only one of these risk factors to identify a patient at
high risk, 47 % required a combination of three or more
factors.
Previous VTE has been established as an independent
risk factor for future VTE [15], and research has shown that
among patients with previous VTE events, recurrent DVT/
PE occurred for 33 % of patients who underwent bariatric
surgery [16]. The same study demonstrated that among
patients with no history of VTE, the incidence of sub-
sequent DVT/PE was zero.
Our study found that 69.9 % of the respondents identi-
fied a history of DVT/PE as the most important risk factor
for VTE, but only 54 % routinely screened high-risk
patients preoperatively for DVT. As reported, 33.1 % of
the surgeons used clinical exam alone, and 20.9 % used
ultrasound. Overall, the majority of surgeons used a history
of DVT/PE as an important marker to identify high-risk
patients, but only 20 % screened patients with preoperative
ultrasound.
The inconsistency between evaluation of risk and pre-
operative screening also was seen in patients with possible
hypercoagulable status. Although 99.7 % of the surgeons
considered a patient with known hypercoagulable status at
high risk for VTE, only 23.2 % evaluated for a previously
unrecognized hypercoagulable status.
Research has shown that up to 70 % of patients pre-
senting with VTE have a demonstrable inherited or
acquired thrombophilia. These include protein C and pro-
tein S deficiency, antithrombin deficiency, factor V-Leiden
mutation, elevated factor VIII, antiphospholipid syndrome,
and hyperhomocysteinemia [17]. Further research has
shown that patients wishing to undergo bariatric surgery
have high rates of both acquired and inherited thrombo-
philias [18].
Although no currently existing data links bariatric sur-
gery patients with known thrombophilias to higher rates of
DVT/PE, inference from previous research suggests that
this could be the case. Surgeons should strongly consider
preoperative assessment for the high-risk patient with
inherited or acquired hypercoagulable status.
Severely obese patients, especially those with BMIs
exceeding 55 kg/m2, tend to experience respiratory insuf-
ficiency, which consists of obesity hypoventilation syn-
drome (arterial PaO2 \ 60 mmHg or arterial partial
pressure of carbon dioxide [PaCO2] [ 47), obstructive
sleep apnea, or both [19].
Obesity hypoventilation syndrome was considered by
65.9 % of our respondents as a factor placing a bariatric
patient in the high-risk category. Patients with respiratory
insufficiency who undergo bariatric surgery have a mor-
tality rate seven times higher than patients without respi-
ratory insufficiency before surgery [20]. This further
establishes low PaO2 as a significant preoperative risk
factor.
The stratification of morbidly obese patients into a high-
risk category should prompt a more aggressive VTE pro-
phylaxis regimen. However, no prophylactic regimen is
uniformly accepted, and no evidence-based approach has
been defined. Although the overall incidence of VTE from
bariatric surgery is 1–3 % and considered low, the presence
of VTE among patients undergoing surgery likely is
underreported [21]. Clinically evident PE may occur
without prodromal signs or symptoms of DVT, so the
opportunity for medical intervention may have already
passed. Additionally, the increasing number of bariatric
procedures performed each year likely will further increase
the number of VTE events that occur.
Preoperative use of unfractionated heparin or its low-
molecular-weight variant is well agreed upon as a mainstay
of VTE chemoprophylaxis for all bariatric surgery patients
[11, 12, 14, 15]. Most (92.4 %) of our respondents used
preoperative chemoprophylaxis for high-risk patients. This
chemoprophylaxis was continued postoperatively, with the
majority (70 %) receiving the first dose on postoperative
day 0. The duration of chemoprophylaxis was much more
variable. Whereas 5 % of the surgeons discontinued che-
moprophylaxis at ambulation, 48.5 % discontinued treat-
ment at discharge. For high-risk patients, 43.8 % of the
surgeons continued chemoprophylaxis on an outpatient
basis for 2–4 weeks. Despite continuation of chemopro-
phylaxis for outpatients, only 47.4 % of the surgeons
routinely screened high-risk patients postoperatively for
DVT, with the majority of screening performed by physical
examination alone.
Although previous studies have shown that high-risk
patients are more likely to experience VTE formation for
3 months postoperatively and that continued chemopro-
phylaxis reduces the incidence of VTE [15, 22], no defin-
itive practice pattern was identified by our study. Nearly
half of the respondents continued chemoprophylaxis,
whereas the other half did not, and the surgeons did not
identify whether the patients discharged with medication
were considered higher risk than the patients discharged
without medication. Furthermore, no standardized postop-
erative screening method was used before discontinuation
of chemoprophylaxis.
Even more aggressive treatment is used by some sur-
geons, with placement of IVC filters. The use of IVC filters
has increased dramatically from 7 % of bariatric patients in
1997 to 55 % in 2007 [23]. Our survey demonstrated that
28.5 % of surgeons routinely use IVC filters in high-risk
bariatric patients. Nearly all the filters placed (99 %) are
the retrievable form (rIVCF). Although findings have
shown the permanent form of IVC filter to be beneficial in
preventing VTE for bariatric patients [24] in the short term,
846 Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848
123
a long-term study has shown an increase in DVT frequency
during a period extending to 8 years [25].
In the high-risk bariatric patient population, rIVCFs are
shown to have a low incidence of DVT, no clinically
evident PE, and the advantage of removal when the
greatest risk to the patient subsides [26]. The literature is
replete with data both supporting and refuting the use of
IVC filters. However, our survey showed that the majority
of surgeons do not use IVC filters routinely for high-risk
bariatric patients.
Conclusions
Overall, our study describes practice patterns with respect to
VTE identification, screening, and prophylaxis among high-
risk bariatric surgery patients. Nearly all the surgeons
(99.7 %) who responded to this survey agreed that high-risk
patients are identified by a group of risk factors (history of
DVT/PE, BMI [ 55 kg/m2, hypercoagulable disorders,
severe immobility, and PaO2 \ 60 mmHg). However, only
half (54 %) routinely screen for DVT preoperatively. Of
these, the majority use clinical examination alone.
Preoperative chemoprophylaxis for high-risk patients
was used by 92 % of the respondents, but the duration of
chemoprophylaxis varied. Nearly half of them discontinued
VTE chemoprophylaxis at discharge, with the remaining
surgeons doing so at 2–4 weeks. As reported, IVC filters
were not routinely used for the high-risk bariatric surgery
population, and less than half of the responding surgeons
routinely screened for DVT postoperatively.
Although certain practice patterns were apparent in this
survey, the duration of treatment and screening varied
significantly. Further studies are needed to determine
whether this variability is clinically significant. Ideally,
future prospective studies will compare screening and
prophylaxis patterns in an effort to determine which
regimen is the most efficacious and to establish an evi-
dence-based prophylactic treatment for VTE as well as
standardized screening for the high-risk bariatric patient.
Disclosures Howard I. Pryor II, Adam Singleton, Elissa Lin, Paul
Lin, and Khashayar Vaziri have no conflict of interest or financial ties
to disclose.
References
1. ASMBS (2010) Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Fact Sheet.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/publicASMBS/Resources/Fact-Sheets/
Metabolic-Bariatric-Surgery-Fact-Sheet-ASMBS2012.pdf
2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence
and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. J Am Med
Assoc 303:235–241
3. Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens CM, Nguyen NT
(2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review
of 3,464 cases. Arch Surg 138:957–961
4. Abdollahi M, Cushman M, Rosendaal FR (2003) Obesity: risk of
venous thrombosis and the interaction with coagulation factor
levels and oral contraceptive use. Thromb Haemost 89:493–498
5. Di Minno G, Mannucci PM, Tufano A, Palareti G, Moia M,
Baccaglini U, Rudelli G, Giudici GA (2005) The first ambulatory
screening on thromboembolism: a multicentre, cross-sectional,
observational study on risk factors for venous thromboembolism.
J Thromb Haemost 3:1459–1466
6. Kucher N, Tapson VF, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Risk factors asso-
ciated with symptomatic pulmonary embolism in a large cohort
of deep vein thrombosis patients. J Thromb Haemost 93:494–498
7. Stein PD, Beemath A, Olson RE (2005) Obesity as a risk factor in
venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 118:978–980
8. Goldhaber SZ, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA,
Speizer FE, Willett WC, Hennekens CH (1997) A prospective study
of risk factors for pulmonary embolism in women. J Am Med Assoc
277:642–645
9. Keenan CR, White RH (2005) Age as a risk factor for venous
thromboembolism after major surgery. Curr Opin Pulm Med
11:398–402
10. Wu EC, Barba CA (2000) Current practices in the prophylaxis of
venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg
10:7–13 discussion 14
11. Frezza EE, Wachtel MS (2006) A simple venous thromboem-
bolism prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing bariatric
surgery. Obesity Silver Spring 14:1961–1965
12. Gugliotti DV (2006) What is the optimal venous thromboembo-
lism prophylaxis for patients undergoing bariatric surgery?
IMPACT consults. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Cleveland
Clinic Perioperative Medicine Summit. Cleve Clin J Med
73(1 (Electronic Suppl)):S17–S18
13. Kalfarentzos F, Stavropoulou F, Yarmenitis S, Kehagias I,
Karamesini M, Dimitrakopoulos A, Maniati A (2001) Prophy-
laxis of venous thromboembolism using two different doses of
low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) in bariatric surgery: a
prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg 11:670–676
14. Miller MT, Rovito PF (2004) An approach to venous thrombo-
embolism prophylaxis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
surgery. Obes Surg 14:731–737
15. Spyropoulos AC, Anderson FA Jr, Fitzgerald G, Decousus H,
Pini M, Chong BH, Zotz RB, Bergmann JF, Tapson V, Froehlich
JB, Monreal M, Merli GJ, Pavanello R, Turpie AG, Nakamura M,
Piovella F, Kakkar AK, Spencer FA (2011) Predictive and
associative models to identify hospitalized medical patients at
risk for VTE. Chest 140:706–714
16. Prystowsky JB, Morasch MD, Eskandari MK, Hungness ES,
Nagle AP (2005) Prospective analysis of the incidence of deep
venous thrombosis in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery
138:759–763 discussion 763–755
17. Bauer KA (2001) The thrombophilias: well-defined risk factors
with uncertain therapeutic implications. Ann Intern Med
135:367–373
18. Overby DW, Kohn GP, Cahan MA, Galanko JA, Colton K,
Moll S, Farrell TM (2009) Prevalence of thrombophilias in
patients presenting for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg
19:1278–1285
19. Zavorsky GS, Hoffman SL (2008) Pulmonary gas exchange in the
morbidly obese. Obes Rev 9:326–339
20. Boone KA, Cullen JJ, Mason EE, Scott DH, Doherty C,
Maher JW (1996) Impact of vertical banded gastroplasty on
respiratory insufficiency of severe obesity. Obes Surg 6:454–458
21. Rocha AT, de Vasconcellos AG, da Luz Neto ER, Araujo DM,
Alves ES, Lopes AA (2006) Risk of venous thromboembolism
Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848 847
123
and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized obese medical
patients and in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Obes Surg 16:1645–1655
22. Hamad GG, Choban PS (2005) Enoxaparin for thromboprophy-
laxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery:
findings of the prophylaxis against VTE outcomes in bariatric
surgery patients receiving enoxaparin (PROBE) study. Obes Surg
15:1368–1374
23. Barba CA, Harrington C, Loewen M (2009) Status of venous
thromboembolism prophylaxis among bariatric surgeons: have
we changed our practice during the past decade? Surg Obes Relat
Dis 5:352–356
24. Gargiulo NJ III, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, Suggs WD, Ohki T,
Goodman E (2006) Experience with inferior vena cava filter
placement in patients undergoing open gastric bypass procedures.
J Vasc Surg 44:1301–1305
25. PREPIC Study Group (2005) Eight-year follow-up of patients with
permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embo-
lism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par
Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112:416–422
26. Vaziri K, Devin Watson J, Harper AP, Lee J, Brody FJ, Sarin S,
Ignacio EA, Chun A, Venbrux AC, Lin PP (2011) Prophylactic
inferior vena cava filters in high-risk bariatric surgery. Obes Surg
21:1580–1584
848 Surg Endosc (2013) 27:843–848
123