Ppt 05

34
Chapter 5 Information Gathering: Unobtrusive Methods Systems Analysis and Design Kendall & Kendall Sixth Edition

Transcript of Ppt 05

Page 1: Ppt 05

Chapter 5Information Gathering: Unobtrusive Methods

Systems Analysis and DesignKendall & Kendall

Sixth Edition

Page 2: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-2

Major Topics

•Sampling

•Quantitative document analysis

•Qualitative document analysis

•Observation

•STROBE

•Applying STROBE

Page 3: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-3

Sampling

•Sampling is a process of systematically selecting representative elements of a population.

• Involves two key decisions:•Which of the key documents and Web

sites should be sampled.

•Which people should be interviewed or sent questionnaires.

Page 4: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-4

Need for Sampling

The reasons systems analysts do sampling are:•Reducing costs.

•Speeding up the data-gathering process.

•Improving effectiveness.

•Reducing data-gathering bias.

Page 5: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-5

Sampling Design Steps

To design a good sample, a systems analyst needs to follow four steps:•Determining the data to be collected or

described.

•Determining the population to be sampled.

•Choosing the type of sample.

•Deciding on the sample size.

Page 6: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-6

Sample Size

The sample size decision should be made according to the specific conditions under which a systems analysts works with such as:•Sampling data on attributes.

•Sampling data on variables.

•Sampling qualitative data.

Page 7: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-7

Types of Sampling

•The four types of sampling are:•Convenience.

•Purposive.

•Simple random.

•Complex random.

Page 8: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-8

Convenience Sampling

•Unrestricted, nonprobability samples

•Easy to arrange

•Most unreliable

Page 9: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-9

Purposive Sampling

•Based on judgment

•Analyst chooses group of individuals to sample

•Based on criteria

•Nonprobability sample

•Moderately reliable

Page 10: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-10

Simple Random Sampling

•Based on a numbered list of the population

•Each person or document has an equal chance of being selected

Page 11: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-11

Complex Random Sampling

•The three forms are:•Systematic sampling.

•Stratified sampling.

•Cluster sampling.

Page 12: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-12

Systematic Sampling

•Simplest method of probability sampling

•Choose every kth person on a list

•Not good if the list is ordered

Page 13: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-13

Stratified Sampling

Stratification is the process of :• Identifying subpopulations or strata• Selecting objects or people for sampling

from the subpopulation• Compensating for a disproportionate

number of employees from a certain group

• Selecting different methods to collect data from different subgroups.

• Most important to the systems analyst

Page 14: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-14

Cluster Sampling

•Select group of documents or people to study.

•Select typical groups that represent the remaining ones.

Page 15: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-15

Deciding Sample Size for Attribute Data

Steps to determine sample size are:•Determine the attribute to sample.

•Locate the database or reports where the attribute is found.

•Examine the attribute and estimate p, the proportion of the population having the attribute.

Page 16: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-16

Deciding Sample Size for Attribute Data

Steps to determine sample size (continued)• Make the subjective decision regarding the

acceptable interval estimate, i• Choose the confidence level and look up the

confidence coefficient (z value) in a table• Calculate σp, the standard error of the

proportion as follows: i

σp = z

Page 17: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-17

p(1-p)

n = + 1σp2

Deciding Sample Size for Attribute Data

Steps to determine sample size (continued)

•Determine the necessary sample size, n, using the following formula:

Page 18: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-18

Confidence Level Table

99% 2.58 98% 2.33 97% 2.17 96% 2.05 95% 1.96 90% 1.65 80% 1.28 50% .67

Page 19: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-19

Hard Data

In addition to sampling, investigation of hard data is another effective method for systems analysts to gather information.

Page 20: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-20

Obtaining Hard Data

Hard data can be obtained by:•Analyzing quantitative documents

such as records used for decision making.

•Performance reports.

•Records.

•Data capture forms.

•Ecommerce and other transactions.

Page 21: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-21

Qualitative Documents

Examine qualitative documents for the following:•Key or guiding metaphors.

•Insiders vs. outsiders mentality.

•What is considered good vs. evil.

•Graphics, logos, and icons in common areas or Web pages.

•A sense of humor.

Page 22: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-22

Analyzing Qualitative Documents

Qualitative documents include:•Memos.

•Signs on bulletin boards.

•Corporate Web sites.

•Manuals.

•Policy handbooks.

Page 23: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-23

Observation

•Observation provides insight on what organizational members actually do.

•See firsthand the relationships that exist between decision makers and other organizational members.

Page 24: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-24

Analyst’s Playscript

• Involves observing the decision-makers behavior and recording their actions using a series of action verbs

•Examples:•Talking.•Sampling.•Corresponding.•Deciding.

Page 25: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-25

STROBE

STRuctured OBservation of the Environment-- a technique for observing the decision maker's environment

Page 26: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-26

STROBE Elements

Analyzes seven environmental elements:• Office location.

• Desk placement.

• Stationary equipment.

• Props.

• External information sources.

• Office lighting and color.

• Clothing worn by decision makers.

Page 27: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-27

Office Location

•Accessible offices•Main corridors, open door

•Major traffic flow area

•Increase interaction frequency and informal messages

• Inaccessible offices•May view the organization differently

•Drift apart from others in objectives

Page 28: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-28

Desk Placement

•Visitors in a tight space, back to wall, large expanse behind desk•Indicates maximum power position

•Desk facing the wall, chair at side•Encourages participation

•Equal exchanges

Page 29: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-29

Stationary Office Equipment

File cabinets and bookshelves:

• If not present, person stores few items of information personally.

• If an abundance, person stores and values information.

Page 30: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-30

Props

•Calculators

•Personal computers

•Pens, pencils, and rulers

• If present, person processes data personally

Page 31: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-31

External Information Sources

•Trade journals or newspapers indicate the person values outside information.

•Company reports, memos, policy handbooks indicate the person values internal information.

Page 32: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-32

Office Lighting and Color

•Warm, incandescent lighting indicates:•A tendency toward more personal

communication.

•More informal communication.

•Brightly lit, bright colors indicate:•More formal communications

(memos, reports).

Page 33: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-33

Clothing

•Male•Formal two piece suit - maximum

authority

•Casual dressing (sport jacket/slacks) - more participative decision making

•Female•Skirted suit - maximum authority

Page 34: Ppt 05

Kendall & Kendall © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall 5-34

Anecdotal List with Symbols

• The five symbols used to evaluate how observation of the elements of STROBE compared with interview results are:• A checkmark, the narrative is confirmed.• An “X” means the narrative is reversed.• An oval or eye-shaped symbol serves as a

cue to look further.• A square means observation modifies the

narrative.• A circle means narrative is supplemented by

observation.