PowerPoint · PDF fileSK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London...

28
SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-14 1 ISO 19030 Scope and implications for buyers and sellers of performance enhancing technologies and solutions London, 14 th March 2017 Stein Kjølberg – Global Sales Director HPS

Transcript of PowerPoint · PDF fileSK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London...

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-141

ISO 19030Scope and implications for buyers and sellers of performance enhancing technologies and solutions

London, 14th March 2017Stein Kjølberg – Global Sales Director HPS

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-142

• Hull performance refers to impact of hull on the fuel efficiency of a ship

• Deterioration in hull & propeller performance between dry-dockings

currently accounts for around 1/10 of world-fleet fuel costs and GHG emissions

• Implications:

~ 20-30 billions in additional fuel cost

~ 0.3% increase in man-made carbon emissions

Hull performance – a ship efficiency killer

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-143

Hu

ll an

d p

rop

elle

r p

erfo

rman

ce

docking interval • Average over period drop in hull & propeller performance caused by bio-fouling and mechanical damage: 15-20%

Biofouling

Mechanicaldamage

Root cause; biofouling and mechanical damage

• 15 to 20% loss in hull & propeller performance 9 to 12% increase in energy cost and GHG emissions

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-144

PAINT MAKER’S DILEMMA

LACK OF MEASURABILITY!

IF I CAN’T MEASURE A RETURN, AN EXTRA INVESTMENT HAS

NO VALUE!

OWNER’S DILEMMA

Why does performance remain poor?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-145

• As a part of our Hull Performance Solutions Jotun developed and launched own measurement method in 2011

- JHPMM

ISO 19030

• Asked to join in a call for an International standard to make JHPMM available as a starting point for work on same

• Became convinced of the benefits of /

need for a commonly agreed upon measurement method

- Reliability

- Comparability

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-146

% deviation

in shaft power

required

to achieve a

given speed

…due to changes in the condition of the underwater hull and propeller

The change in power required to move the ship through water at a given speed...

Fuel & Air

Engine

Gear Box & Clutch

Shaft Bearings

TorsiometerPropulsion power (kW)

Propeller

Hull

Speed sensor(m/s)

Water

Ground

Speed (m/s)

Power (kW)

ISO 19030Practical methods for measuring hull and propeller performance

…and a set of relevant performance indicators for hull and propeller related maintenance, repair,

retrofit activities.

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-147

DDn DDn+1

R

E

t

H

PI-2

DDI

Where:

H Hull and propeller performance t TimeDDn Present dry-docking (or in the case of a new ship, date of entry into service)DDn+1 Next dry-dockingDDI Dry-docking intervalR Reference period: hull and propeller performance following present out-dockingE Evaluation period: average hull and propeller performance over the remainder of the dry-docking intervalPI-2 Performance Indicator 2: In-service performance

In-service performance: The average change in hull and propeller performance over the period following out-docking to the end of the dry-docking interval

Determine the effectiveness of the AF solution (including any maintenance activities that have occurred over the course of the full dry-docking interval)

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-148

E

H

DDn DDn+1t

DDI

Where:

H Hull and propeller performance t TimeDDn Present dry-docking DDn+1 Next dry-dockingDDI Dry-docking intervalR Reference period: average hull and propeller performance following previous out-dockingsE Evaluation period: hull and propeller performance following present out-dockingPI-1 Performance Indicator 1: Dry-docking performance

Dry-docking performance: Change in hull and propeller performance following present out-docking as compared with the average from previous out-dockings

Rp3Rp3R

PI-1

Determining the effectiveness of the dry-docking (repair and/or retrofit activities)

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-149

R

E

H

PI-3

DDn DDn+1t

DDI

Where:

H Hull and propeller performance t TimeDDn Present dry-docking (or in the case of a new ship, date of entry into service)DDn+1 Next dry-dockingDDI Dry-docking intervalR Reference period: hull and propeller performance following present out-dockingE Evaluation period: moving average hull and propeller performance at any chosen timePI-3 Performance Indicator 3: Maintenance trigger

Maintenance trigger: Change in hull and propeller performance from the start of the dry-docking interval to a moving average at any chosen time

Trigger underwater hull and propeller maintenance, including propeller and/or hull inspection

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1410

R

E

H PI-4

DDn DDn+1t

DDI

Where:

H Hull and propeller performance t TimeDDn Present dry-docking (or in the case of a new ship, date of entry into service)DDn+1 Next dry-dockingDDI Dry-docking intervale Maintenance eventR Reference period: hull and propeller performance before maintenance eventE Evaluation period: hull and propeller performance after maintenance eventPI-4 Performance Indicator 3: Maintenance effect

e

Maintenance effect: Change in hull and propeller performance measured before and after a maintenance event

Determine the effectiveness of a specific maintenance event, including any propeller and/or hull cleaning

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1411

ISO 19030Basic performance indicators

Dry-docking performanceIn-service performance

Perf

orm

ance v

alu

e time

kHP

Perf

orm

ance v

alu

e time

kHP

DDnDDn-1

Maintenance trigger

Perf

orm

ance v

alu

e time

kHP

Maintenance effect

Perf

orm

ance v

alu

e time

kHP

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1412

Part 1: General principles Part 2: Default method Part 3: Alternative methods

• Outlines general principles

• Defines a set of basic performance indicators for hull and propeller maintenance, repair and retrofit.

• Defines the default method for measuring changes and calculating the basic performance indicators

• Describes the expected accuracy of the basic performance indicators.

• Defines a set of alternative methods for measuring and calculating the basic performance indicators

• Based on typically available measurement infrastructure.

Organization

ISO 19030-2(default method)

+/- 0.3 p.p. accuracy

ISO 19030-3(alt. methods)

+/- 0.4 to 4.6 p.p. accuracy depending on implementation

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1413

Process and conclusion

• 53 experts representing…- ship owners, ship builders, class societies, paint makers,

performance monitoring companies, various research institutions and others

• …invested > 12 000 hours in developing, reviewing & achieving consensus on drafts

- Improved accuracy and applicability

- Alignment with ISO 15016

93%

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1414

How will ISO 19030 impact your business…?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1415

ISO 19030 will enable…

Better decisions

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1416

Best: 1.2% average

over period power increase

Better: 8.1% average

over period power increase

Typical: 19.2% average

over period power increase

$1.8 million ($202/m2)

16 000 ton CO₂

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1417

Best: 1.2% average

over period power increase

Better: 8.1% average

over period power increase

Typical: 19.2% average

over period power increase

1. Can the method used be relied upon…?

2. Is the level of uncertainty acceptable…?

3. Are the comparisons meaningful…?

4. Is the sample relevant & large enough…?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1418

Best: 1.2% average

over period power increase

Better: 8.1% average

over period power increase

Typical: 19.2% average

over period power increase

1. Can the method used be relied upon…?

2. Is the level of uncertainty acceptable…?

3. Are the comparisons meaningful…?

4. Is the sample relevant & large enough…?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1419

ISO 19030 will enable…

Increased transparencyBetter decisions

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1420

ISO 19030 will enable…

Better decisionsCloser alignment of

stakeholder incentives

BUYER SELLERS

BUILDERSCHARTERERS

Increased transparency

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1421

BUYER SELLERS

BUILDERSCHARTERERS

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1422

ISO 19030 will enable…

Better decisionsCloser alignment of

stakeholder incentives

BUYER SELLERS

BUILDERSCHARTERERS

Increased transparency

…and quantifiable reductions in energy cost and GHG emissions!

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1423

Who forces you to useISO 19030?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1424

For buyers & sellers advances in measurements of hull performance will enable…

Digitization

EU MRV

Industry 4.0

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1425

What next?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1426

How can this benefit the chemical and tanker industry?

• An ISO standard for Hull and Propeller performance is now in place

• Could a similar idea for cleaning and coating of tanks help the industry move forward?

“Increasingly strict tank cleaning standards required by charterers are also being addressed. Such requirements result in over-cleaning and a subsequent waste of fuel, energy and time, as well as increased costs and an impact on the environment. The Committee is working on the production of a set of cleaning standards which could be deployed as an industry standard.”

• How about the selection of the correct coating product?

− On what basis are charterers or owners making their decisions?

− Could a similar approach help the industry make better decisions?

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1427

Creating customer value by

Delivering measurable performance and not just paint…

SK / HPS / 9th Chemical and Product Tanker conference / London 2017-03-1428