Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Design...

56
Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Design Project Doug Astler Leah Krombach Calvin Nwachuku Andrew Will

Transcript of Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Design...

Power, Propulsion, and

Thermal Design Project

Doug Astler

Leah Krombach

Calvin Nwachuku

Andrew Will

Mission Specifications

• 10 day mission with 3 contingency days

o 3 days to Moon

o 4 days on Moon

o 3 days to return to Earth

• Gross mass of 4795 kg

• Design a reaction control system

o 6 degree of freedom control

o ∆V of 50m/s

o Hold altitude in dead band

o Overcome entry aerodynamic moments

o Rotate 180 degrees in less than 30 seconds

Team B3 2 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Mission Specifications Cont.

• Design a power system

o Provide power to spacecraft

o Support all mission phases

• Design thermal control system

o Radiator temperature

o Radiator size

o Radiator location

o Maintain cabin temperature during all mission

phases

• Choose design from crew system design project

Team B3 3 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Outline

• Selecting a Design

• Coordinate System

• Propulsion

o Dead Band Control Algorithm

Attitude Trajectories in the Phase Plane

Phase Plot of Reaction Control System

Duty Cycle vs Tau/I

o Dead Band Control Thrust

o Reentry Control

o Cold-gas Thruster

o Propellants for Cold-gas Thruster

Thrust vs Area

Mass vs Gas Type

Volume vs Gas Type

Team B3 4 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Outline Cont.

o Cold-gas Reaction Control System

o Nitrogen Mass Breakdown

o Thrusters Structure and Location

o Reaction Control System

• Power System

o Solar Cells

o Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

o Batteries

o Fuel Cells

o Power Trade Study

Mass vs Time

Volume vs Power

Team B3 5 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Outline Cont.

• Thermal

o Temperature of Environment

o Internal Temperature Calculations

o Internal Cabin Temperature Without External Radiator

o Temperature Control

o Temperature vs. Emissivity in LLO Eclipse

o Selection of Emissivity

o Radiator Sizing

o Temperature of External Radiator vs. Area of External Radiator

o Selection of Radiator

o Final External Radiator Temperature

o Radiator Mass (Aluminum)

• Total Mass and Volume

• CAD

Team B3 6 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Selecting a Design

Name Power (Watts) Mass (kg)

Leah 443 1,331

Doug 839 1,352

Calvin 421.3 1,340.8

Andrew 1,126.6 1,303.1

Fig 1. Power vs Mass Considerations from Previous Design

Team B3 7 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Selecting a Design Cont. • Picked Andrew's team design (A4)

• Lowest value of mass

• Highest value of power required

o Team A4 considered power required for:

E.D.C CO2 scrubbing

Trace Contaminants Control

Water Distillation

Dehumidifier

O2, N2 and H2 Storage

o Picked highest value of power

Took into account the most systems requiring power

Safer to over design for max power

Team B3 8 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Coordinate System

• Right hand

system

• Y direction points

into the page

• Origin at the

center of mass

Fig 2. Coordinate System

Team B3 9 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Propulsion System

Team B3 10 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Propulsion

• Cold-gas system

• Analyzed dead band for our spacecraft to find duty

cycle and thrust required

• Analyzed thrust required for aerodynamic moment

• Analyzed thrust required for roll on reentry

• Nitrogen was chosen as the propellant

Team B3 11 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Dead Band Control Algorithm

• Zero thrust o Theta varies between -10 and 10 degrees

o Theta dot varies between -0.8 and 0.8 degrees per

second

• Negative Thrust

o Falls below dead band

• Positive Thrust

o Rises above dead band

Team B3 12 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 3. Phase Plot of Spacecraft Under Different Torques [1]

Team B3 13 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 4. Simulation of Dead Band Algorithm With Initial Angular Displacement and Velocity

Team B3 14 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 5. Duty Cycle vs. Torque Over Moment of Inertia for Dead Band Algorithm

Team B3 15 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Dead Band Control Thrust

• As the previous slide indicates

o Lowest duty cycle is 0.005

o Occurs at a torque over moment of inertia of 0.0011s-2

• Important Constants needed

o Ixx = Iyy = 8.33x103 kgm2

o Izz = 1.12x104 kgm2

o Moment Arm = 1.34 m

• For the X and the Y direction and using Tau/I = .0011 the

thrust required is 3.37 N

• For the Z direction and using the same Tau/I the thrust

required is 4.6 N

Team B3 16 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Reentry Control

• Overcome 500 Nm in pitch and yaw

o Centroid of thrusters aligned with center of mass

Moment arm of 1.34 m

o 500𝑁𝑚 = 2𝑇 ∗ 1.34𝑚 where T is thrust

o T = 186.57 N

• Rotate 180 degrees in 30 seconds

o Same thrust as pitch and yaw thrusters

o T=186.57 N

o Izz = 1.12x104 kgm2

o1

2

𝜏

𝐼𝑡2 = 𝜋

o t=5.93 seconds Team B3 17 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Cold-gas Thruster

Fig 6. Schematic of a Cold-Gas Rocket System [2]

Team B3 18 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Propellants for Cold Gas Thruster

Propellant Molecular Mass Density (lb/ft3) Isp (sec)

Hydrogen 2 1.21 296

Helium 4 2.37 179

Methane 16 12.1 114

Nitrogen 28 17.37 80

Air 28.9 19.3 74

Argon 39.9 27.6 57

Krypton 83.8 67.2 39

Freon 14 88 60.01 55

Fig 7. Properties of Propellants Used in a Cold-gas Thruster [3]

Team B3 19 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 8. Thrust vs Area for a Cold-gas Rocket System for varying propellants

Team B3 20 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 9. Reaction Control System Total Mass vs. Species of Gas

Team B3 21 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 10. Reaction Control System Total Volume vs. Species of Gas

Team B3 22 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Cold-gas Reaction Control System

• Nitrogen was chosen for the reaction control system

o Total Mass (including tank) = 439.3 kg

o Volume = 1.43 m3

• Able to overcome entry aerodynamic moments

• Supports rotation of spacecraft on reentry

• Three levels of thrust

o Three valve settings

3.37 N

4.6 N

186.36 N

Team B3 23 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Nitrogen Mass Breakdown

System Nitrogen Mass (kg)

Translational ∆V 296.3

Reentry (Yaw and Pitch) 42.9

Reentry (Roll) 1.4

X-axis Dead Band 20.2

Y-axis Dead Band 20.2

Z-axis Dead Band 29.4

Total Mass 410.4

Fig 11. Mass Breakdown of Propellant

Team B3 24 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Thrusters Structure and Location

• Four thruster pentads surround the capsule at 90

degree intervals

• Thrusters have five nozzles each 90 degrees from the

others

• Diameter of each thruster is 15 cm

• Centroid of each thruster pentad aligned with capsule's

center of mass

o 96 cm above base of cone

• Thrusters fire in a coupling fashion to achieve purely

rotational or translational motion

o 6 DOF

Team B3 25 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Thruster Structure

Fig 12. Pentad Thruster Configuration

Team B3 26 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Power System

Team B3 27 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Power Systems

Possible Power Systems

• Flywheels

• Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Generators

• Solar Cells

• Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

(RTGs)

• Batteries

• Fuel Cells

Team B3 28 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Power Systems Cont.

• Flywheels and magnetohydrodynamic

generators eliminated as possibilities for our

spacecraft

o Flywheels cannot sustain the amount of power

required for the length of the time this mission takes

place [4]

o MHD generators are capable of producing enough

power, but they also cannot sustain that power for

the mission length [4]

Team B3 29 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Solar Cells

• Use photons from the Sun to power spacecraft

• Opting to consider modern Stretched Lens Array SquareRigger (SLASR)

technology for solar arrays [5]

o Specific Power >300 W/kg [5]

o Areal Power Density >200 W/m2 [5]

o Volume (per unit specific power) 3.33x10-8 m3 [5]

Fig 13. CAD Drawing of Solar Cell [5]

Team B3 30 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

• Radioisotope Thermoelectric

Generators (RTGs)

o Long-lived power source

that converts heat into

electricity

o Minimum lifetime of 14

years [7]

o Specific Power

= 2.8 W/kg [7]

o Volume (per unit specific

energy) = 0.0085 m3 [7]

Fig 14. MMRTG Diagram [6]

Team B3 31 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Batteries

• Li Ion LiMn2O4 battery

packs to provide

electric power

• Specific Energy = 130

Wh/kg [9]

• Volume (per unit

specific energy) =

1.25x10-6 m3 [9]

Fig 15. Li Ion LiMn2O4 Battery Pack [8]

Team B3 32 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fuel Cells

• Use methanol-based EFOY 1600-M28 fuel

cells

• Convert chemical energy to electricity

• Specific Energy =

805.1 Wh/kg [10]

• Volume (per unit

specific energy) =

1.24x10-6 m3 [10]

Fig 16. Diagram of Fuel Cell System [10]

Team B3 33 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 17. Trade Study of Mass vs Time for Power Systems

Team B3 34 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 18. Trade Study of Volume vs Power for Power Systems

Team B3 35 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Power System

• Systems not considered o RTG system

Volume exceeds 10 m3 for 13-day mission

o Lithium ion batteries

Mass exceeds 1000 kg for power required

o Solar cells

Present an additional problem of extra surface

area required

Even though most power efficient

Team B3 36 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Power System

• EFOY 1600-M28 fuel cells were chosen for

this mission o Mass = 518.9 kg

o Power: 839 W (Crew Systems) + ~500 W (Avionics)

= 1339 W

o Maximum Energy: 1339 W x 13 days = 417.8 kWh

o Volume = 0.0835 m3

• All mission phases use the same power

o No dependency on sun

o No dependency on heat

Team B3 37 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Thermal Control System

Team B3 38 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Temperatures of Environment

• Space = 4 K

• LEO eclipse = 116 K

• LEO with sun= 280 K

• Lunar Surface [11]

o Polar = 160 K

o 45 degrees Sun= 340 K

o Noon equatorial = 378 K

o Dawn equatorial = 90 K

o Dusk equatorial = 120 K

Team B3 39 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Internal Temperature Calculations

Team B3 40 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Internal Cabin Temperature Without

External Radiator LTO - Full Sun Cone Illuminated 371.4 K

LTO - Full Sun Base Illuminated 371.4 K

LEO - Full Sun Cone Illuminated 398.3 K

Eclipse LEO 321.6 K

Eclipse LLO 320.2 K

Lunar Surface Polar 414.0 K

Lunar Surface 45 Degree 434.1 K

Lunar Surface Equatorial Noon 410.1 K

Lunar Surface Equatorial Dawn 371.6 K

Lunar Surface Equatorial Dusk 371.9 K

Max: Lunar Surface 45 Degree 434.1 K

Min: Eclipse LLO 320.2 K

Team B3 41 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Temperature Control

In order to maintain cabin temperature

• Design spacecraft to have an emissivity to

keep crew warm during the coldest part of the

mission (LLO eclipse)

• Design radiators to dissipate extra heat in the

warmest part of the mission (Lunar Surface)

Team B3 42 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 19. Trade Study of Temperature vs Emissivity in LLO Eclipse

Team B3 43 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Selection of Emissivity

• Emissivity between .165 and .173 to keep

the crew at a comfortable temperature

during LLO eclipse

• Absorptance is not a factor because the

spacecraft is not receiving any sunlight

(Qsolar=0)

• Select SiOx on VDA tape for capsule

covering[12]

o Emissivity = .12

o Absorptance = .14 Team B3 44 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Radiator Sizing

After selecting spacecraft coating

• Determine size of radiators needed by o Hottest location

Lunar surface

o Requirement to maintain cabin temperature at 273K

(room temp)

Team B3 45 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Fig 20. Trade Study of Temperature vs Area of External Radiator

Team B3 46 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Selection of Radiator

• Based on the curve a radiator size of 30 m2 was

chosen

• Radiator material chosen is aluminum for its light

weight

• Painted with Z93 white paint for its high

emissivity and low absorptance[12]

o Absorptance = .17

o Emissivity = .92

Team B3 47 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Final External Radiator

Temperatures Cabin Internal Temperature 293 K

LTO - Full Sun Cone Illuminated 282.9 K

LEO - Full Sun Cone Illuminated 355.3 K

LEO Eclipse 211.7 K

LLO Eclipse 203.8 K

Lunar Surface Polar 249.6 K

Lunar Surface 45 Degree 363.6 K

Lunar Surface Equatorial Noon 391.4 K

Lunar Surface Equatorisl Dawn 205.4 K

Lunar Surface Equatorial Dusk 209.6 K

Max: Lunar Surface Equatorial 391 K

Min: Lunar Surface Eclipse 204 K

Team B3 48 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

15𝑚2 ∗ (100𝑐𝑚

𝑚)2∗ 1𝑐𝑚 = 150000𝑐𝑚3

150000𝑐𝑚3 ∗2.7𝑔

𝑐𝑚3= 405000𝑔

405000𝑔 ∗1𝑘𝑔

1000𝑔= 405𝑘𝑔

Radiator Mass Calculation

(Aluminum)

Volume

Mass

Mass in kg

Team B3 49 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Radiator Configuration

5 .75mx1m panels (unfolded) Panels fold in for travel to and from moon

Team B3 50 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Total Mass

System Mass (kg)

Crew Systems 1303.1

Nitrogen Tank 439.3

Radiator 405

Fuel Cells 518.9

Total Mass 2666.3

Total Allotted 4795

Margin 44.4% Fig 21. Mass Allocation

Team B3 51 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Volume Budget

System Volume (m3)

Initial Volume 6.77

Crew Systems 3.01

Nitrogen 1.34

Fuel Cells 0.84

Remaining 1.58

Margin 23.3%

Fig. 22. Volume Allocation

Team B3 52 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

Team B3 53 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

References

1. Akin, Dave. Lecture 14 PPT/Rocket Propulsion, 2012

2. Zandbergen B.T.C., Modern liquid propellant rocket engines; 2000

Outlook, Internal Publication, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of

Aerospace Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, March 2000.

3. G.P. Sutton, Rocket Propulsion Elements (5th ed.) John Wiley and Sons,

1986.

4. Akin, Dave. Lecture 15 PPT/Power Systems Design, 2012

5. O’Neill, Mark, Joe Howell, Louis Lollar, and Connie Carrington.

"STRETCHED LENS ARRAY SQUARERIGGER (SLASR) TECHNOLOGY

MATURATION." N.p., 2007. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.

<http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20090022305_20090

22268.pdf>

6. Bechtel, Ryan. U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Energy, n.d. Web. 6

Nov. 2012.

<http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/pdf/MMRTG_RyanBechtel_DOE.pdf>.

Team B3 54 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

References Cont.

7. Caponiti, Alice. "Space Radioisotope Power Systems: Multi-Mission

Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator." N.p., Sept. 2006. Web. 6 Nov.

2012. <http://nuclear.gov/pdfFiles/MMRTG.pdf>.

8. "Ningbo Yingda Lithium Ion Battery Technology Industrial Co., Ltd." 48V

150Ah UPS Li Ion LiMn2O4 Battery,View 48v Battery,YINGDA Product

Details from on Alibaba.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Nov. 2012.

<http://yingdalithium.en.alibaba.com/product/487232050-

212674626/48V_150Ah_UPS_Li_Ion_LiMn2O4_Battery.html>.

9. Narayan, S. R., and Thomas I. Valdez. "High-Energy Portable Fuel Cell

Power Sources." N.p., Winter 2008. Web. 6 Nov. 2012.

<http://www.electrochem.org/dl/interface/wtr/wtr08/wtr08_p40-45.pdf>.

10. "High Energy Density Fuel Cell Systems." Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.,

n.d. Web. 6 Nov. 2012.

<http://www.parc.com/content/attachments/fuelcells_arpa-e_parc.pdf>.

Team B3 55 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483

References Cont.

11.Harris, Daniel K. "Chapter 7: Thermal Considerations of Lunar Based

Systems." Chapter 7. ESMD Course Material: Fundamentals of Lunar and

Systems Engineering for Senior Project Teams, with Application to a Lunar

Excavator, n.d. Web. 07 Nov. 2012.

<http://education.ksc.nasa.gov/esmdspacegrant/LunarRegolithExcavatorC

ourse/Chapter7.htm>.

12.Gilmore, David G. Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook. El Segundo,

CA: Aerospace, 2002. Print.

Team B3 56 Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design

ENAE 483