Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results

1
Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results Uncertainty introduced for Uk and other targets. Tying in health and carbon and bringing UK strategies together. Sustainable consumption and consumer is heartbeat and choice editing. Copenhagen about national targets whereas footprinting is about international. Rewarding people for lower energy use in factories. Didn’t talk about energy source today. Talked about deforestation. Discussion of food waste. Importance of total vs household. Packaging hasn’t arisen today. Is food waste now the dominant. (Alan saying a lot on packaging has been done). Challenge of competitive environment. What about completely transforming eating habits. Viz iPod. If we need a revolution we might need to continue with these sort of meetings. Copenhagen result stronger than we thought. Choice editing was interesting. Pepsi and M & S spreading the word. Value rainforests more alive than dead. Water and water globally, quality and quantity is key to the future, 2030 and 2050. Got the highest score. Complexity of communication to consumers. How can we boil it down. How to manage disappearing rainforests with the role of GM. AK: In awe, water crept in. Global v UK food security. Pulling diverse issues under title Carbon. Climate change v sustainability v food security. Emerging close issues. Looked at relationship with nature and what diets we should be eating. Profound new debate. Carbon as headline, but something different happening.

description

Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results. Uncertainty introduced for Uk and other targets. Tying in health and carbon and bringing UK strategies together. Sustainable consumption and consumer is heartbeat and choice editing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results

Page 1: Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results

Post Copenhagen Planning Table Results

• Uncertainty introduced for Uk and other targets.

• Tying in health and carbon and bringing UK strategies together.

• Sustainable consumption and consumer is heartbeat and choice editing.

• Copenhagen about national targets whereas footprinting is about international.

• Rewarding people for lower energy use in factories.

• Didn’t talk about energy source today.• Talked about deforestation.• Discussion of food waste. Importance of total

vs household.• Packaging hasn’t arisen today. Is food waste

now the dominant. (Alan saying a lot on packaging has been done). Challenge of competitive environment.

• What about completely transforming eating habits.

• Viz iPod.• If we need a revolution we might need to

continue with these sort of meetings.• Copenhagen result stronger than we thought.

Choice editing was interesting.• Pepsi and M & S spreading the word.• Value rainforests more alive than dead.• Water and water globally, quality and quantity is

key to the future, 2030 and 2050. Got the highest score.

• Complexity of communication to consumers. How can we boil it down. How to manage disappearing rainforests with the role of GM.

• AK: In awe, water crept in. Global v UK food security. Pulling diverse issues under title Carbon. Climate change v sustainability v food security. Emerging close issues. Looked at relationship with nature and what diets we should be eating. Profound new debate. Carbon as headline, but something different happening.