Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

62
positive interactions & ecosystem function in deserts @cjlortie

Transcript of Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Page 1: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

positive interactions & ecosystem function in deserts

@cjlortie

Page 2: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

theory time

rich & controversial dialogue in community ecology

Page 3: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts
Page 4: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

community assemblygradients

negative versus positive interactionsplant-animal interactions

community resilienceinvasive species

foundation versus keystone speciesstress-gradient hypothesis

collapse

Page 5: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

the sure-thing principle from the philosophy of causality

Savage (1954), Pearl (2016)

Page 6: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Simpson’s paradox

(x,y) <- z

Simpson (1951), Blyth (1972)

Page 7: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Simpson’s paradox in ecology is context dependency

Page 8: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Chamberlain et al 2014

Page 9: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

150 years of competition research

grasslands

Page 10: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

25 years of facilitation research

deserts

Page 11: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

grasslands versus deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 12: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

grasslands versus deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 13: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

grasslands versus deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 14: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 15: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 16: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

deserts

Germano et al. 2011

Page 17: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

alternative ecosystem classification = different management strategies

Germano et al. 2011

Page 18: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

alternative ecosystem classification = different ecological theories

Page 19: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

the sure-thing in desert communities

positive plant interactions

Page 20: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

the sure-thing in desert communities

positive plant interactions

(+, 0)

(+, +)

(+,-)

+ net outcome

facilitation

Page 21: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

the sure-thing in desert communities

Bertness & Callaway 1994

Page 22: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

He et al. 2013

Page 23: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

frequency does not necessarily = importance in communities

Brooker (2010), Kikvidze et al. (2011)

Page 24: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

facilitation theory: assembly

Lortie et al. 2004

Page 25: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

facilitation theory: diversity

Michalet et al. 2006

Page 26: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

facilitation theory: niche

Bulleri et al 2015

Page 27: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

facilitation theory: function

Lortie et al. 2016

Page 28: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

facilitation theory: ecosystem function

carbon capturewater retention

pollinatorsmoderating climate

reduced evaporation transpirationrefuges

biodiversityfood

pollinator maintenance

function research decoupled from interactions

Page 29: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

shrubs in the San Joaquin Desert

Page 30: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

ecological function of shrubs in San Joaquin Desert

niche theory for the San Joaquin Desert

Page 31: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1. niche & ranges

Sotomayor et al. (2016)

Hypothesis: Dominant plants in deserts provide additional fundamental niches for protégé species expanding their ranges.

Page 32: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1. niche & ranges for local plant species

Sotomayor et al. (2016)

Page 33: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1. niche & ranges for local plant species

Sotomayor et al. (2016)

Page 34: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

field tests: two-phase model

Pescador et al. (2014)

Page 35: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1I. shrub loss

Liczner, Westphal, Filazzola

Page 36: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1I. shrub loss

Liczner, Westphal, Filazzola

Hypothesis: Shrubs and shrub mimics have a positive influence on the activity of Gambelia sila by providing shelter for hunting, light, or

predators.

Page 37: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1I. shrub loss

Liczner, Westphal, Filazzola

Page 38: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1I. shrub loss

Liczner, Westphal, Filazzola

Page 39: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test1I. shrub loss

Liczner, Westphal, Filazzola

Page 40: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test III. regional survey of shrub effects & seed addition

Filazzola, Westphal

Hypothesis: Positive shrub-annual interactions increase with abiotic stress and reduced nutrient availability along a regional gradient of

continentality.

Page 41: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test III. regional survey of shrub effects & seed addition

Filazzola, Westphal

Page 42: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test III. regional survey of shrub effects & seed addition

Filazzola, Westphal

Page 43: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test IV. regional survey of shrub effects

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal

Hypothesis: Facilitation by desert shrubs within the San Joaquin Desert region is species specific.

Page 44: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test IV. regional survey of shrub effects

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal

Page 45: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

20142013 2015

E. californica L. tridentata E. californica L. tridentata E. californica L. tridentata

decreasing abiotic stress decreasing abiotic stress decreasing abiotic stress

test IV. regional survey of shrub effects

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal

Page 46: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test V. shrub-animal effects in the Carrizo

Noble, Westphal, Saslaw, Germano, Butterfield

Hypothesis: Desert shrubs provide direct benefits to small animals (shelter) & indirect benefits (prey & protection).

Page 47: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Noble, Westphal, Saslaw, Germano, Butterfield

test V. shrub-animal effects in the Carrizo

Page 48: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Noble, Westphal, Saslaw, Germano, Butterfield

test V. shrub-animal effects in the Carrizo

Page 49: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

Noble, Westphal, Saslaw, Germano, Butterfield

test V. shrub-animal effects in the Carrizo

Page 50: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

440,000 pictures

~0.5% animal detection rate

presence of listed species

Noble, Westphal, Saslaw, Germano, Butterfield

test V. shrub-animal effects in the Carrizo

Page 51: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Hypothesis: Shrubs directly and indirectly buffer local changes in the microenvironment thereby functioning as refuges for other species

within regions subject to dramatic global change drivers.

Page 52: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Page 53: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Page 54: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Page 55: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Page 56: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Lortie, Filazzola, Westphal, Butterfield

Page 57: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VI. climate mediation by shrubs in the Cuyama Valley

Page 58: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VII. shrub-pollinator functions

Ruttan

Hypothesis: Shrub resource islands have positive, non-additive effects on pollinator communities.

Page 59: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

test VII. shrub-pollinator functions

Ruttan

Page 60: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

implications & opportunities

shrubs are a lucky charm for experimental structure & restorationin deserts

Page 61: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

implications & opportunities

other taxaconnections to shared data

informed management

Page 62: Positive interactions and ecosystem function in deserts

NSERCBLMTNC

ecoblender.org