Pond/Impoundment Closures: Jonathon Weier Business-Case ...

20
PAGE 1 Industrial Process Pond/Impoundment Closures: Business-Case Opportunities to Create Ecosystem Services Jonathon Weier

Transcript of Pond/Impoundment Closures: Jonathon Weier Business-Case ...

PAGE 1

Industrial Process Pond/Impoundment Closures: Business-Case Opportunities to Create Ecosystem Services

Jonathon Weier

PAGE 2

Source: Google Earth

Source: Google Earth

Source: RemedX Remediation Services

PAGE 3Traditional Isolation Cap

• Sheds water• Poor growing conditions• Limited edaphic variability• Typically mown• Expensive

Vegetative Layer

Contaminated Soil

Clay

Sand and GravelDrainage Layer

Geomembrance

Water Table

Clean Soil

Drainage Pipe

Clean Soil

Monitoring Well

PAGE 4Traditional Cap on Closed Impoundment13 Plant Species

PAGE 5Alternatives to Traditional Isolation Cap

MonolithicEvapotranspiration (ET)Soil Cover

ET CapillaryBarrier

BioengineeringManagement Asphalt Barrier Subaqueous

No Action

A

PAGE 6Potential Benefits

Lower Cost Less Maintenance Longer Life

More Habitat Value More Human Use Value

PAGE 7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

A B C D E F G H I J

Tota

l Num

ber o

f Tax

aSpring 2008

Spring 2017

Open Water Littoral Zone

PAGE 8

Water-Associated Birds

Family Group Total # of Species Migratory Only

Pandionidae Ospreys 1 0

Anatidae Ducks, Geese, Swans 21 19

Charadriidae Plovers, Dotterels, Lapwings 1 0

Laridae Gulls, Terns and Skimmers 1 1

Scolopacidae Sandpipers, Curlews and Snipe 2 1

Alcedinidae Kingfishers 1 0

Rallidae Rails 1 1

Hirundinidae Swallows, Martins 2 1

Ardeidae Herons 3 1

Podicipedidae Grebes 1 0

TOTALS 34 24

PAGE 9

13 Plant Species 28 Plant Species

Traditional Cap vs Soil Cover

PAGE 10

Plant Species2015 (46)2016 (58)2017 (74)

PAGE 11

Types of Arthropods• Primary Consumers• Pollinators• Secondary Consumers• Detritivores

Source: Castagneyrol and Jactel, 2012

PAGE 12

Construction

Resources

Adjacent Area

Supply Chain

Compartmentsof Opportunity

Footprint

PAGE 13Challenges

EcologyRegulatory approval of alternative closuresConcerned stakeholders Successful implementation of innovative/nonconventional designs

PAGE 14Source: Birds in the Yard

Source: WikiwandSource: Roy Wood

Source: USFWS

PAGE 15

Source: Guertin et al., 2018

Ecosystem Services Identification & Inventory Tool

PAGE 16

Active and Passive Human Use Services ($)

Identifies the protective options that create the greatest net environmental benefit at the lowest cost.

Ecological Services(discounted service acre years)

Net Environmental Benefit Analysis

PAGE 17

Closure Option Protective? Cost ($)

Ecological Service Value

(dSAYs)

Human Use Value

(NPV $)

Net dSAYsper $ Spent

Net Human Use Value per

$ Spent

NO ACTION (BASELINE) N 0 300 0 na na

CAP Y 2,500,000 1500 50,000 0.0005 0.02

SOIL COVER Y 1,100,000 4000 300,000 0.003 0.27

Example Output from NEBA Analysis

PAGE 18Field Pilot Testing

PAGE 19

Geomorphic DesignSource: Hopkinson et al., 2017

PAGE 20

Closing Thoughts