Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

download Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

of 28

Transcript of Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    1/28

    Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    1,3-Buatadiene Polymerization Case Study

    By

    G. A. Melhem, Ph.D.

    [email protected]

    A Presentation to the

    DIERS USERS GROUP

    April 28-30, 2003, Philadelphia, PA

    www.iomosaic.com

    2003, ioMosaic Corporation, 93 Stiles Road, Salem, New Hampshire 03079, USA. All rights reserved

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    2/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 2

    Incident statistics of reactive storage

    Survey recently completed bythe chemical safetyinvestigation board

    Storage vessels and drumsaccount for 32 % of allaccidents surveyed

    Source: J. Murphy, CSIB Public Hearing Staff Preliminary Conclusions, May 2002, Paterson,New Jersey.

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    3/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 3

    Polymerizations: How much do we know ?

    Free radical polymerizations are the best studiedreactions in all of chemistry[1]

    The kinetics of alkyllithium initiation for styrene anddiene polymers in hydrocarbon solutions has beeninvestigated extensively[10]

    In 1998, the chemical and petrochemical industries

    produced 87 Billion lbs of polymers including

    thermoplastics, thermosets, synthetic fibers, andsynthetic rubber[2]

    Many companies have developed and tunedpolymerization models (anionic, free radical, etc.)that can be coupled with thermally initiated

    polymerization kinetics for relief design underrunaway reaction scenarios[3][4][5]

    Millions of lbs

    Thermoplastics

    Polyethylene - Low Density 7,578

    Polyethylene - Linear Low Density 7,227Polyethylene - High Density 12,924

    Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers 14,502

    Polypropylene 13,825

    Polystyrene 6,327

    Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene 3,086

    Thermosets

    Phenolic 3,940

    Urea 2,581

    Unsaturated Polyester 1,713

    Epoxy 639

    Melamine 290

    Synthetic Fibers

    Polyester 3,911

    Nylon 2,847

    Olefin 2,800

    Acrylic 346

    Acetate and Rayon 365

    Synthetic Rubber

    Styrene-Butadiene 960

    Polybutadiene 580

    Ethylene-Propylene 321

    Nitrile 89

    Polychloroprene 72

    Totals 86,923

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    4/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 4

    The heats of reaction/polymerization are well known[6]

    Monomer Bond Polymer Bond

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (Kcal/gmol)

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (BTU/lbmol)

    C=C -C-C -20 -35,977

    C=O -C-O -5 -8,994C=N -C-N -1.4 -2,518

    CN -C=N- -7.2 -12,952

    C=S -C-S- -2 -3,598

    S=O -S-O- -7 -12,592

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    5/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 5

    The heats of reaction/polymerization are well known[7][8][9]

    Monomer

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (kcal/gmol)

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (BTU/lbmol)

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (cal/g)

    Heat of

    Polymerization

    (BTU/lb)

    LOWMethyl Styrene -8.4 -15,110 -71 -128

    Methyl Methacrylate -13.5 -24,284 -135 -243

    Styrene -16.7 -30,041 -160 -288

    Vinylidene Chloride -18 -32,379 -186 -334

    Methyl Acrylate -18.8 -33,818 -218 -393

    Isobutene -12.3 -22,126 -219 -394Vinyl Acetate -21 -37,776 -244 -439

    Isoprene -17.8 -32,019 -261 -470

    1,3-butadiene -17.4 -31,300 -322 -579

    Vinyl Chloride -22.9 -41,193 -366 -659

    Tetrafluoroethylene -37.2 -66,917 -372 -669

    Propylene -20.5 -36,876 -487 -876

    Ethylene -22.7 -40,834 -809 -1,456

    HIGH

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    6/28GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 6

    The mechanism of free radical polymerization involves three steps:initiation, propagation, and termination[1][2][8][10]

    [ ]2 [ ]

    dk

    d

    d I I R k I

    dt

    =Initiation

    1

    [ ][ ][ ]

    pk

    n n p

    d MM M k M M

    dt

    ++ =Propagation

    2[ ]dead polymer 2 [ ]tk

    n m t

    d MM M k M

    dt

    + =Termination

    At steady-state (> 1 min), the net rate of production of free radicals iszero so that the initiation and termination rates are equal

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    7/28GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 7

    Other important data can be estimated using the steady state assumptionsuch as termination rates and average degree of polymerization [1][2][8][10]

    2[ ]dead polymer 2 [ ] 2 [ ]tk

    n m t d

    d MM k M k f I

    dt

    + = =

    Termination

    [ ]where

    [ ] 2

    p

    d t

    kM DP k k

    I k k f = =

    Average Degree of Polymerization*

    * Molecular weight of polymer / molecular of monomer

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    8/28GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 8

    Often, the free radical rate expression is simplified such that the rate ofpolymerization is represented using a composite form[1][2][8]

    ( )

    3

    1

    2

    1[ ] [ ]

    is the number of moles in ( )and[] in ( / )

    where f is theinitiatorefficiency

    1exp where and

    2

    exp an

    monomerc monomer

    l

    dc p

    t

    c dc c c p c p d t

    t

    dd d

    dNk N I

    V dt

    N kmol is kmol m

    kk k f

    kE A

    k A A A f E E E E T A

    Ek AT

    =

    =

    = = = +

    =

    3 3 1

    d

    Total liquid volume in , and are in ( / / ) and is in

    d

    l p t d

    dI k Idt

    V m k k m kmol s k s

    =

    =

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    9/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 9

    There are many published values for kd[1][8][11]

    INITIATOR REFERENCE SOLVENT Ad Ed (/K) Kd at 50 C

    sqrt(Kd/K*)

    at 50 C

    2,2-Azo-bis-isobutyronitrile (AIBN) Polymer Handbook Benzene 1.438E+15 15,449 2.485E-06 1.189

    2,2-Azo-bis-isobutyronitrile (AIBN) Principles of Polymerization Benzene 1.881E+14 14,842 2.129E-06 1.100

    Benzoyl peroxide Polymer Handbook Benzene 5.281E+12 13,990 8.349E-07 0.689Benzoyl peroxide Principles of Polymerization Benzene 7.390E+13 14,950 5.983E-07 0.583

    Benzoyl peroxide ATOFINA Catalogue 3.184E+14 15,318 8.254E-07 0.685

    Butadiene Polyperoxide Butadiene Safety Manual 2.400E+07 9,864 1.329E-06 0.869

    Cumyl peroxide Polymer Handbook Benzene 1.318E+18 20,481 3.933E-10 0.015

    Cumyl peroxide Principles of Polymerization Benzene 1.290E+18 20,482 3.832E-10 0.015

    Lauroyl Peroxide Polymer Handbook Benzene 2.142E+15 15,298 5.907E-06 1.833

    Lauroyl Peroxide* ATOFINA Catalogue 1.300E+16 16,272 1.759E-06 1.000

    tert-Butyl hydroperoxide Polymer Handbook Benzene 3.223E+15 20,531 8.228E-13 0.001

    tert-Butyl hydroperoxide Principles of Polymerization Benzene 2.868E+15 20,531 7.342E-13 0.001

    tert-Butyl hydroperoxide ATOFINA Catalogue 1.523E+12 17,321 8.033E-12 0.002

    tert-Butyl perbonzoate Polymer Handbook Benzene 2.314E+15 17,462 7.886E-09 0.067

    tert-Butyl perbonzoate ATOFINA Catalogue 1.754E+14 16,465 1.307E-08 0.086

    tert-Butyl peroxide (TBP) Polymer Handbook Benzene 8.568E+13 17,110 8.685E-10 0.022

    tert-Butyl peroxide (TBP) Principles of Polymerization Benzene 3.236E+14 17,668 5.825E-10 0.018

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    10/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 10

    There are many published values for kp, and kt[1][8]

    Kp = Ap exp ( -Ep/T)

    Kt = At exp (-Et/T)

    Ep and Et are in /K

    Ap and At are m3/kmol/s

    References [1] and [8] provide guidance and typical values on activation energies, pre-exponential factors, rateconstants, and rate constant ratios

    Monomer Ap Ep kp at 60 C At Et kt at 60 C kp/kt

    Vinyl Chloride 3.300E+06 1,924 10,231 1.474E+12 2,117 2.564E+09 3.990E-06

    Vinyl Acetate 1.532E+06 2,165 2,307 7.899E+10 2,634 2.910E+07 7.926E-05

    Acrylonitrile 6.813E+05 1,948 1,965 2.719E+11 2,717 7.800E+07 2.519E-05

    Methyl acrylate 1.000E+08 3,572 2,205 2.884E+10 2,670 9.534E+06 2.313E-04

    Methyl methacrylate 8.700E+06 3,175 631 1.876E+09 1,431 2.555E+07 2.471E-05

    Styrene 4.500E+06 3,127 377 1.079E+09 962 6.008E+07 6.281E-06

    Ethylene 1.862E+05 2,213 243 8.636E+08 156 5.401E+08 4.494E-07

    1,3-Butadiene 1.200E+07 2,923 1,8591,3-Butadiene [15] 8.050E+07 4,292 205 1.130E+10 711 1.337E+09 1.530E-07

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    11/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 11

    1,3-Butadiene thermally initiated polymerization occurs in both thevapor and liquid phases[16][11]

    Thermal dimerization of butadiene to form vinylcyclohexene proceedsaccording to the rate equation (dominant dimerization reaction at 600BTU/lb of BD) and is second order in BD.

    7 21 12,3443.47 10 exp [ ]BD BDdN

    CV dt T

    =

    Thermal dimerization of butadiene to form 1,5-cyclooctadiene proceedsaccording to the rate equation (a few percent of COD typically formed)

    8 21 14,3121.8 10 exp [ ]BD BDdN

    CV dt T

    =

    Where N is the number of moles (kmol), V is the total liquid volume (m3), T is the temperature in (K), t is the timein (s), and CBD is concentration of butadiene in (kmol/m3).

    Thermal trimerization of butadiene to form 3,3-octahydro diphenylproceeds according to the rate equation

    131 19,1228 10 exp [ ][ ]BD BD VCH

    dNC C

    V dt T

    =

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    12/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 12

    We conducted several adiabatic calorimetry tests to verify thebutadiene kinetics reported in the literature

    The TBC was removed by vacuum distillation

    Test A, B, and C were conducted in the accelerating rate calorimeter

    (ARC) Test D was conducted in the advanced pressure tracking adiabatic

    calorimeter (APTAC)

    Lauroyl peroxide was used to simulate the effect of butadiene

    polyperoxide on butadiene polymerization

    The test data clearly shows (as stated in various literature sources) thatthe onset temperature of the butadiene polymerization is loweredconsiderably in the presence of active oxygen

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    13/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 13

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    14/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 14

    TEMPERATURE (C)

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    dT/dt(C/MIN)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    Test A

    Test B

    Test C

    Test A Test B Test C

    Inert gas Argon Argon Argon

    1,3-Butadiene Sample Mass (g) 2.089 2.057 4.345

    Active Oxygen Concentration (ppmw) 0 557 2,682

    Test Cell Weight (g) 10.447 10.414 6.834

    Test Cell Volume (ml) 9 9 9

    Test Cell + Fittings Weight (g) 21.157 21.087 17.55

    Detection Sensitivity (C/min) 0.02 0.02 0.02

    Start Temperature (C) 28.8 18.65 23.2

    Heat Step (C) 3 3 3

    Wait Time (min) 20 20 20

    Starting Pressure (psia) 40.5 33.4 38.1

    Detected Onset Temperature (C) 112 73 55

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    15/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 15

    TIME (MIN)

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000

    TE

    MPERATURE(C)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    Test A

    Test B

    Test C

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    16/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 16

    TIME (MIN)

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000

    PR

    ESSURE(PSIA)

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    Test A Test B Test C

    Inert gas Argon Argon Argon

    1,3-Butadiene Sample Mass (g) 2.089 2.057 4.345

    Active Oxygen Concentration (ppmw) 0 557 2,682

    Test Cell Weight (g) 10.447 10.414 6.834

    Test Cell Volume (ml) 9 9 9

    Test Cell + Fittings Weight (g) 21.157 21.087 17.55

    Detection Sensitivity (C/min) 0.02 0.02 0.02

    Start Temperature (C) 28.8 18.65 23.2

    Heat Step (C) 3 3 3

    Wait Time (min) 20 20 20

    Starting Pressure (psia) 40.5 33.4 38.1

    Detected Onset Temperature (C) 112 73 55

    Test ATest B

    Test C

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    17/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 17

    TEMPERATURE (C)

    0 100 200 300 400

    PR

    ESSURE(PSIA)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    Test A Test B Test C

    Inert gas Argon Argon Argon1,3-Butadiene Sample Mass (g) 2.089 2.057 4.345

    Active Oxygen Concentration (ppm) 0 557 2,682

    Test Cell Weight (g) 10.447 10.414 6.834

    Test Cell Volume (ml) 9 9 9

    Test Cell + Fittings Weight (g) 21.157 21.087 17.55

    Detection Sensitivity (C/min) 0.02 0.02 0.02

    Start Temperature (C) 28.8 18.65 23.2

    Heat Step (C) 3 3 3

    Wait Time (min) 20 20 20

    Starting Pressure (psia) 40.5 33.4 38.1

    Detected Onset Temperature (C) 112 73 55

    Test C

    Test A

    Test B

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    18/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 18

    TEMPERATURE (C)

    0 50 100 150 200

    dT/dt(C/MIN)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100 Test DInert gas None

    1,3-Butadiene Sample Mass (g) 60.31

    Active Oxygen Concentration ppmw 570

    Test Cell Weight (g) 34.82

    Test Cell Volume (ml) 133

    Test Cell + Fittings Weight (g) 38.88

    Detection Sensitivity (C/min) 0.06

    Start Temperature (C) 25

    Heat Step (C) 2Wait Time (min) 20

    Starting Pressure (psia) 56

    Detected Onset Temperature (C) 50Dead End

    Polymerization

    Dimerization

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    19/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 19

    TEMPERATURE (C)

    0 50 100 150 200

    dP

    /dt(PSI/MIN)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1000 Test DInert gas None

    1,3-Butadiene Sample Mass (g) 60.31

    Active Oxygen Concentration ppmw 570

    Test Cell Weight (g) 34.82

    Test Cell Volume (ml) 133

    Test Cell + Fittings Weight (g) 38.88

    Detection Sensitivity (C/min) 0.06

    Start Temperature (C) 25

    Heat Step (C) 2Wait Time (min) 20

    Starting Pressure (psia) 56

    Detected Onset Temperature (C) 50

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    20/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 20

    Model fit for free radical and thermally initiated 1,3-butadiene kinetics

    TEMPERATURE. F

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    dT/dt(C

    /MIN)

    0.001

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    Model Predictions

    Experimental

    10

    ,

    1

    210

    1 13,7862.7815 10 exp [ ]

    where

    13,786

    2.7815 10 exp

    BD BD active ppmw

    d

    pt

    dNC C

    V dt T

    k

    k fT k

    =

    =

    Where N is the number of moles (kmol), Vis the total liquid volume (m3), T is thetemperature in (K), t is the time in (s), CBDis concentration of butadiene in (kmol/m3),and Cactive is the concentration of activeoxygen/free radicals in ppm

    Dimerization

    Note that dimerization kineticsare based on knownliterature data and were not fitfrom this data set.

    Dead EndPolymerization

    Source: SuperChems Expert Version 5.2

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    21/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 21

    Model fit for free radical and thermally initiated 1,3-butadiene kinetics

    TEMPERATURE. F

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    dP/dt(PS

    I/MIN)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    Experimental

    Model Predictions

    Source: SuperChems Expert Version 5.2

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    22/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 22

    Dilute concentrations of butadiene polyperoxide decompose at highertemperatures than Lauroyl peroxide[11][12]

    TEMPERATURE. F

    0 100 200 300 400

    C/CoAFTER

    60MINUTES

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    BDP

    LP

    Where C is in ppm, k is in /s and T is in Kelvins.

    7

    16

    9,8642.4 10 exp

    16,1721.3 10 exp

    BDP

    LP

    dC k Cdt

    kT

    kT

    =

    =

    =

    The decomposition rate of Lauroyl (LP) andbutadiene polyperoxide (BDP) at diluteconcentrations are give by the following rateexpressions:

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    23/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 23

    The presence of active butadiene popcorn polymer increases the ratesof the butadiene free radical polymerization and lowers its onsettemperature[15]

    Active butadiene popcorn polymer always contains peroxides, which areformed by the peroxidation of butadiene by dissolved oxygen

    The peroxide, required for the formation of popcorn polymer, and theperoxide containing butadiene popcorn polymer itself are known to initiatethe free radical polymerization of butadiene at low temperatures

    Adiabatic data indicate the potential for a runaway reaction at atemperature at least 50 C lower than would be expected for neatbutadiene

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    24/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 24

    Popcorn kinetics model predictions based on 1950s data[11][13][14]

    EXPERIMENTAL POPCORN MASS RATIO. M/Mo

    0 10 20 30 40

    PR

    EDICTED

    POPCO

    RN

    MASSRATIO.

    M/Mo

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    where T is in Kelvins, k is in /s, andM is the BD popcorn mass

    7 10,1318.0 10 exp

    dM

    k Mdt

    kT

    =

    =

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    25/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 25

    The free radical model established for 1,3-butadiene using lauroylperoxide can easily be extended to other free radical initiators

    1

    210

    ,

    ,

    ,

    1

    2

    ,

    1 13,7862.7815 10 exp [ ]

    exp

    For 2,2-Azo-bis-isobutyronitrile,benzoyl peroxide,and butadiene polyperoxide

    1 at 50C

    dBD BD active ppmw

    d LP

    active ppmw dd

    d

    d LP

    kdNC C

    V dt T k dC E

    kdt T

    k

    k

    =

    =

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    26/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 26

    An Example of an anionic radical polymerization for acrylonitrile

    TEMPERATURE (C)

    0 100 200 300

    dT/dt(C

    /MIN)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100Test cell becomesliquid full due to expansion

    Thermally initiatedpolymerization

    Anion initiatedpolymerization

    ARC test / Thermal Inertia = 1.81Total sample mass = 3.6 g (20 % Active A)Anionic species mass = 0.6 g

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    27/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 27

    Summary / Conclusions

    Polymerization reactions are the best studied reactions in all of chemistry

    Well known heats of polymerization and thermal polymerization models

    Free radical and anionic polymerizations of many common polymer systemscan easily be established and modeled: (a) using literature data, or

    (b) Established experimental techniques of adiabatic/isothermal calorimetry, or

    (c) in-house proprietary production kinetic models.

    Free radical polymerization models should be run in parallel with thermallyinitiated polymerization models

    It is possible for a free radical/anion initiated polymerization to jump-startthermally initiated polymerizations if sufficient initiator is present

    Polymerization models are simple and can easily be applied in SuperChemsfor DIERS or other simulation computer codes for performing relief design forreactive systems and process optimization as well

  • 8/7/2019 Polymerization Modeling for Relief Systems Design

    28/28

    GAM/Spring 2003 DIERS 28

    References

    [1] Polymer Chemistry, An Introduction, R. B. Seymour and C. E. Carraher, Jr., Mercel Dekker, NY, 1981

    [2] http://www.stanford.edu/class/cheme160/lectures/lecture1.pdf

    [3] Identification and Validation of a VSL Polymerization Reactor Model, Bayer Inc., Sarnia, Canada, 1998-2002,

    http://www.uni-bayreuth.de/departments/math/~kschittkowski/proj_bay.htm

    [4] Styrene-butadiene rubber synthesized by anionic polymerization, M. C. Iovu et al., 2000,

    http://www.sun.ac.za/unesco/Conferences/Conference2000/Abstracts2000/Iovu/IOVU.pdf[5] Modeling of ionic polymerization process: styrene and butadiene, A. Sirohi and K. Ravindranath, AIChE Spring 1999 Meeting, Houston.

    [6] http://www.stanford.edu/class/cheme160/lectures

    [7] G. Moad and Solomon, The Chemistry of Free Radical Polymerization, Pergamon, ISBN 0080420788

    [8] G. Odian, Principles of Polymerization, 3rd Edition, Wiley, 1991

    [9] http://www.chem.warwick.ac.uk/ug/ugcourses/year3/ch3a4/downloads/Background.pdf

    [10] Anionic Polymerization, Principles and Practical Application, H. L. Hsieh and R. P. Quirk, Mercel Dekker, 1996

    [11] Butadiene Safety Manual, D. G. Hendry and F. R. Mayo, Stanford Research Institute, 1966

    [12] ATOFINA Peroxide Catalogue

    [13] Butadiene Popcorn Polymer, G. H. Miller et al., Journal of Polymer Science, 1952, pp. 453-462

    [14] Proliferous Polymerization, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Wiley, 1988, 2nd Edition, pp. 453-463

    [15] H. G. Fisher, DIERS Users Group Presentation, May 11, 2002

    [16] International symposium on runaway reactions, effluent handling and pressure relief design, G. A. Melhem and H. G. Fisher, Editors,AIChE, 1998.