PMR INDONESIA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS REPORT (ISR)

The PMR Project Implementation Status Report should be prepared by the Implementing Country or Technical Partner, with the support of the Delivery Partner and/or the PMR Secretariat. For any questions related to the preparation of the PMR Project Implementation Status Report, please contact the PMR Secretariat at: pmrsecretariat@worldbank.org.

1. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION

Implementing Country/ Technical Partner: Republic of Indonesia

Reporting Period: From 10/01/2017 to 09/28/2018

Report Date: 09/28/2018

Implementing Agency: Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs (CMEA)

Contact Person: Mr. Dida Gardera (CMEA) Mr. Roy Rahendra (PMU)

Grant Executed By: UNDP Indonesia

Grant Effectiveness and Closing Dates: 11/11/2016 – 10/10/2020

Grant Amount (USD): USD 3,000,000

Funding Mobilized (USD): USD 2,057,352.98 (t0tal expenses until Sep 2018)

Funding Committed (USD): USD 432.855,36

2. OVERVIEW

Since starting in early 2017, the project has been progressing to date with completion of GHG emissions profiles in power and industry sectors (Component 1), finalization of the MRV systems for both sectors (Component 2) and preparation to pilot the MRV systems (Component 3). Works in development of market-based instrument framework (Component 4) is ongoing as the study of MBI options assessment is being completed and various stakeholders are being consulted on MBI implementation. Complementary to the MBI study, opportunities to develop carbon offsetting mechanism and voluntary ETS(s) is being discussed. Technical discussions on cap setting for power sector is also held between the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and the National Power Company (PLN). Organization, communication, consultation and stakeholder engagement (Component 5) is implemented continuously as the overarching component of PMR Indonesia activities.

3. IMPLEMENTATION REPORT BY COMPONENT

Differences between the Objectives/Activities in the Market Readiness Proposal and the

Grant Agreement.

Are there any important and material differences between the objectives/activities proposed in the Market Readiness Proposal and endorsed by the Partnership Assembly of the PMR and those agreed to in the Grant Agreement with the Delivery Partner and described in the Project’s Results Framework?

No.

n/a

Implementation Progress by Component

A. Component 1: Profiling emissions in the power and industry

Status: Completed

Completed ✓ The component focusses on providing information to support the development of policies on GHG mitigation action in the target area, including the decision making on the implementing of a marked-based instrument. The study was implemented to calculate and project baseline emissions, estimate potential emissions reduction, and estimate CO2 abatement cost of mitigation actions in power and energy intensive industry. The scope of the study including:

1. Preparation of the overview of Indonesia’s power and industry sectors 2. Provide and develop GHG emissions baseline for the Indonesia’s

power sector 3. Estimate potential of emission reductions and abatement cost of

mitigation actions 4. Develop a comprehensive final report 5. Ensuring stakeholder participations

The areas covered within this study were power sector and energy-intensive-industry sectors. For power sector, the study involved data collections from 1,140 out of 6,138 generation units across Indonesia. This 1,140 units represents 92% of total national production of 248 TWh. While for industry, the study involved 8 energy-intensive-industry sub-sectors (e.g.: cement, pulp and paper, chemical, fertilizer, food and beverage, iron and steel, textile, and ceramic and glass) with more than 40 industry clusters across Indonesia.

The report has been submitted and now is being used as valuable references in

discussions among government partners. Executive summaries for both sectors

are available on the PMR Indonesia website. A final version of the report will be

shared with the PMR Secretariat for sharing on the PMR website.

Comments:

This work was ambitious, due to the large scale of target populations and complexity of power-plants and industry sub-sectors to be engaged within the study, and the limited period of time to complete it (10 months). However, the consultant delivered – working closely with the working groups- using various methodology to collect data and engage stakeholders such as meetings and site visits.

B. Component 2: Design of governance aspects of an MRV system

Status: Under Implementation

As proposed in the MRP, the project will design the governance aspects of the MRV system using the existing building blocks and initiatives. So far, there are some capacity for measurement, calculation and reporting within MEMR for electricity production and within MoI with their initiative in Industries’ GHG reporting system. To date, key important milestones and activities among others: Design of MRV system in power sector (Completed) ✓

• Series of working group meeting have been conducted to discuss the design of MRV system in power sector. The MRV system in power sector have been running since 2003. PMR is strengthening the MRV system in power sector by developing the MRV Guideline and an online reporting system.

• The MRV guideline for power sector has been completed in May 2018, and the Guidelines was launched on May 15th, 2018. The guideline was developed in line with the international and national recognized procedures to calculate GHG emission from power sector.

• Along with the design the MRV system, PMR also supporting the MEMR in developing the online reporting system for GHG Emission for power generations, called APPLE-GATRIK (Aplikasi Penghitungan dan Pelaporan Emisi Ketenaga-listrikan). The online system was completed in June 2018 and officially launched (with training) in August 2018. The pilot MRV for Jamali will be started in late October 2018. APPLE-GATRIK is being embedded into the MEMR website. The MEMR will utilize APPLE-GATRIK to replace the offline system that has been running since 2003. PMR has supported the MRV training workshop covering three different areas (i.e. West Indonesia, Java and Kalimantan, and East Indonesia) involving representative from all power plants (including IPPs). All power plants company has been granted with specific account to access the APPLE-GATRIK.

• Two draft regulations were prepared to be the legal basis for full implementation of the MRV system: (1) Minister Regulation on the GHG Inventory and Mitigation in Energy Sector (2) DG Electricity Decree on Guidelines on MRV and Mandatory Reporting System The draft of Minister’s regulation has been submitted to MEMR Legal Bureau on December 2017. The draft DG Electricity decree on MRV implementation, will be submitted after the Minister’s regulation is issued. Despite of delayed issuance of the two regulations, MEMR continuing the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions from power generations using the existing regulation (Presidential Regulation 61/2011 - on National Action Plan on GHG Emission Reductions) – as the legal basis.

Design of MRV system in Industry sector (on-going) In industry sector, MRV systems are being designed by MoI for GHG inventories and National Communications purposes, also to verify the emission reductions in each of sub-sectors (to report progress on mitigation actions). In 2017, MoI has taking the “basic MRV” process one step further by integrating the industry GHG reporting system in sub-sectoral level with the MoI’s national main platform for pool of information and data submission. MoI has built a web-based integrated system collecting both GHG and non-GHG related-data, including Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) data. Developed in-house using state budget, the Information System for National Industry (SIINAS), has a sub-menu of Online Information Monitoring System for GHG emission (SIM Online). The system is built for Indonesia to have a national database of all industries and allows the industry to enter data directly into the system using a formal account. The SIM Online will support MoI in developing an aggregated GHG inventory data in sub-sectoral level. SIM-Online has been developed independently since 2013, however its use has not yet being fully implemented across the industry sector, thus it is now integrated into SIINas to reach wider stakeholders and have wider data range. At sub-sectoral level, MoI is now at the planning/design stage of MRV development and are developing systems with different scales and scopes, utilizing a range of different guidelines tailored specifically for each of the sub-sectors. Currently, PMR is supporting MoI in sub-sectoral level of MRV, which indirectly also will contribute to the overall

MRV in sectoral level.

• Initial draft of MRV guidelines for the fertilizer industry is available and currently under finalization process (target November 2018). The scope of the guidelines includes emission reporting procedures through an online SIM. The expert team will be on a trial-visit to a large fertilizer company, PT Pupuk Kaltim (PKT III and V units) to improve the guidelines and assess GHG data reporting in facility level.

• The pulp and paper industry will begin discussions on the preparation of technical guidelines for GHG emission calculation and reporting in September 2018.

Two draft regulations (Minister of Industry regulation) were prepared to be the legal basis for full implementation of the MRV system, namely: (1) Draft of Minister of Industry Regulations on “Activity Data

Reporting on GHG Emission Sources in Industry Sector” (2) Draft of Minister of Industry Regulations on “MRV on GHG

Inventory and Climate Change Mitigation for Cement Industry”.

Both drafts were submitted to the MoI Legal Bureau for further review. Following this review, they would be presented for signature by the minister.

Capacity building on MRV (Completed) ✓

• Series of capacity building events and awareness raising campaign on MRV of GHG emission were conducted parallel with the profiling study. Training on measurement and quantification of GHG emission also has been implemented in nine sub sectors as indicated above. Awareness raising campaign on MRV also conducted targeting relevant senior staff of government and private sectors related to the climate change.

• Another aspect of capacity building on MRV is training focusing on calculation and measurement of GHG emission. In 2018, more than 14 workshops were held, inviting and involving the industry and industry associations from all 8 (eight) energy intensive industry sub-sectors. More than 1,120 staffs from around 560 companies/industry were participated in the training.

• For power sector, the training involved more than 600 staffs of PT PLN and IPPs, representing 1,400 out of 6,138 generation units. This data from 1,400 units represents 92% of total national production of 248 TWh

• Moreover, related with GHG emission reporting in industry sector, in October 2017, MoI claimed only 1 company submitted their report to SIM Online, which was a pulp and paper company. With PMR support parallel with the activity of MRV capacity building and

GHG emission profiling study, almost 100 companies have now submitted their data to the SIM Online, ranging from cement industry, pulp and paper, fertilizer, to ceramic and glass industry.

Comments:

Despite of delayed issuance of the two regulations, MoI continuing the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions using the existing regulation (Presidential Regulation 61/2011 - on National Action Plan on GHG Emission Reductions) – as the legal basis. The issuance of Minister decree on “Activity Data Reporting on GHG Emission Sources in Industry Sector” are on hold awaiting Minister’s decision on the integration the industrial GHG reporting into the larger national industry information system and database ( SIINAS). Until the new regulation is issued, the monitoring and reporting for GHG emissions for industry sector will continue to be carried out using the (existing) Presidential Regulation no. 61/2011 - on National Action Plan on GHG Emission Reductions Meanwhile for cement sector, the monitoring and reporting for CO2 emission reduction is being (continuously) implemented under (existing) Minister of Industry Regulation no. 12/2012 on “Roadmap on CO2 Reduction of Cement Industry Emissions”. A Technical Guideline for Calculation and Reporting of CO2 Emissions Cement Industry has also been published by MoI in 2013, followed by development of Guideline for MRV of Cement Industry in 2016.

C. Component 3: Piloting an MRV system

Status: Under Implementation

The works in Component 3 is closely related to the works in Component 2. The MRP proposes to develop and pilot MRV systems for:

• Electricity generations – with the JAMALI interconnected grid as the pilot area; and

• Energy intensive industries – with cement and fertilizer as pilot area. To date, key important milestones and activities among others: Mapping of MRV system (Completed) ✓

• In order to have an updated and clear information of MRV system, a study was conducted to mapping the MRV of GHG emission in the national and sectoral level, especially in the power and industry sectors. The study was completed on March 2018 and the report has been presented at the power and industry working group meetings to equipped them with the current progress/status on national MRV systems and its implementation.

• The study shows that there are at least 4 GHG reporting system that

exists in Indonesia and being implemented by different line ministries for the same purposes. With this situation, data management systems and harmonization between relevant ministries / institutions are one of many challenges in implementing the MRV system at the national level. At the sectoral level and facilities, understanding the calculation of emissions, as well as data collection is still inadequate. Development of standards and methodologies for calculating GHG emissions also needs to be done.

• Efforts to improve the implementation of the MRV emission system in Indonesia have its own challenges in each sector. Capacity building for the calculation of GHG emissions at the personal, institutional and social levels are also needed. Improvement efforts should be focused on the sources that have been identified as key categories and to improve the quality of the GHG inventory to a higher tier. In the data supply management system, improving the quality of activity data and emission factors, documentation and the QA / QC system are priority improvements in the implementation of the emission MRV system in Indonesia.

• This study later triggered the initiative of having all the systems to be harmonized (integrated/synchronized) to avoid information overlaps and to avoid additional burdens to the industry and private sectors.

Piloting MRV for Power (on-going)

• Power generation capacity in the islands of Java, Madura, and Bali is accounted for around 65% of total Indonesia’s power generation capacity in 2016. These islands have integrated grid connection, which is known as JAMALI interconnected grid. JAMALI grid itself consists of more than 300 powerplant units of various types and technologies and is the main source of GHG emissions from Indonesian power sector.

• The working group is now discussing the coverage and strengthening the preparation for piloting implementation. The piloting activities will be implemented using the developed guideline and the online reporting system. Piloting is expected to begin in October 2018

• PMR has conducted MRV training workshop inviting all power plant companies in JAMALI areas on 27-28 August in Jakarta. The training was aimed to increase familiarity with the newly adopted guideline and online reporting tool involving all relevant stakeholders (including PLN and IPPs). This event was conducted to align with the start of pilot implementation on October 2018.

• For power sector, existing monitoring protocols and data management system had been reviewed in integrated manner with the processes to develop MRV guideline and online reporting tool for power sector, i.e. the online reporting tool will also serve as data management system for power sector. A separate study was held to assess the possibility to include CEMS as a monitoring protocol for power sector and it was decided so and correspondingly included in the MRV guideline.

Piloting MRV for Industry (on-going)

• Related to the MRV pilot for industry, series of working group meeting have been conducted to discuss the preparation of design of MRV system for industry sectors. There has been a discussion within the working group on selecting the pilot for industry sectors and it was decided that the MRV pilot activities will involve the cement and fertilizer sectors. In addition, PMR will support MoI in developing draft of technical guideline on reporting and calculation of GHG emission for pulp and paper industry.

• To strengthen the verifiability of GHG emissions data in cement and fertilizer industry, experts were and being hired to refine the results of implementation map of data protocol/data management system at the facility level. This scope is integrated in the development of respective MRV guidelines.

Comments:

For MRV pilot in cement and fertilizer industries, the level of support from PMR will differ taking into consideration the readiness level of each sector. Technical support for MRV in cement industries will be emphasized in building the capacities for verification instead of monitoring and reporting.

D. Component 4: Development of a market-based instrument framework

Status:

Under Implementation

This particular Component is under the supervision of Working Group of Market-Based Instrument, led by Ministry of Environment and Forestry, to elaborate the MBI options for Indonesia and its development roadmap. In parallel with the underway MBI options study, technical discussions with various stakeholders has been initiated to explore possibilities of piloting and cap setting approaches. To date, key important milestones and activities among others: Study to get a comprehensive assessment on MBI options for Indonesia is being conducted through a consulting firm. The final report is expected to be completed by November 2018 together with the models of four market-based instruments scenarios, namely:

• ETS for power and industry sector;

• Energy efficiency certificate for industry sector;

• Cap-and-tax; and

• Carbon offset mechanism. The models will estimate the macro economic impacts as well as the mitigation impact of the MBI scenarios whilst estimating the reasonable carbon price of emission reduction units from several types of mitigation actions. Aside from the modelling, the study had finished several reports in carbon market condition scoping, compilation of several MBI experiences from

other country, and a policy gap analysis. The study is very important since it will be an important reference for further MRP implementation. After successfully organized series of special workshops and training on MBI in 2017, the WG MBI shifted the approach in 2018 by organizing the MBI knowledge and awareness as embedded program in MRV training workshops. This approach proven to be more effective and having strong relevancies with the MRV discussions. To this point, there were more than 23 meeting with MBI awareness component has been conducted jointly by WG MBI and others in in 2018.

Comments:

The MBI Working Group had agreed on revised work plan that consists of efforts to accelerate the Component 4 implementation, including the MBI pilot implementation, as soon as the MBI design for selected component were completed by end of 2018.

E. Component 5: Organization, communication, consultation and engagement Status: Under Implementation

A. Organization

Key important milestones and activities were implemented, among others:

A Steering Committee and three Technical Working Groups were established, which responsible to work on three different thematic program:

• WG for Power – lead by MEMR

• WG for Industry – lead by MoI

• WG for MBI – lead by MoEF

The CMEA (Coordination Ministry for Economic Affairs) is the primary beneficiary of this project, while MEMR (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources) and MoI (Ministry of Industry) are the main beneficiaries of the program. In the implementation arrangement, the MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forestry) as the focal point of UNFCCC were invited and involved to lead the MBI discussion, together with the Ministry of Finance (MoF), and National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas) who would play an important role in mainstreaming this project into the national development plans and the national budgeting system.

Figure 3 - PMR Implementation Strategy

B. Communication, Consultation and Engagement Key important milestones and activities were implemented, among others: The kick-off meeting was conducted on 1 March 2017, led by CMEA and attended by all relevant agencies, among others: Bappenas, Ministry of Finance (MoF), Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF), Ministry of

Industry (MoI), Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR), PT PLN (state owned electricity company), industry associations (cement, fertilizer, pulp and papers, etc.) Series of technical discussions has been conducted to facilitate the PMR program implementation for the three thematic areas on: power, industry, and MBI. Since the program launch on March 1st 2017, more than 150 meetings were conducted, ranging from mini internal meetings, focus group discussions, into large seminars (see Annex 1). Series of public discussions were also held during August and September 2018 to discuss issues on carbon market and carbon pricing instruments. These public discussions were part of PMR communications strategy for awareness raising and engagement activities. PMR Indonesia, jointly with Directorate General of Climate Change (DG-PPI), MoEF Research and Development Center (Balitbang KLHK), and the Advisory Board of Climate Change (DP-PPI) collaboratively organized 5 weekly public discussions to discuss the role of carbon market and carbon pricing instruments to promote Low Carbon Development Pathways in the Context of NDC Implementation.

The discussion series were inviting decision makers from MoEF, MEMR, MoI, Bappenas, and Ministry of Finance – along with national and international experts, including private sectors and industry associations.

The discussion series was intended to:

• Increase stakeholder awareness and understanding of market-based mitigation instruments and its implementations.

• Obtain input from stakeholders regarding the implementation of market-based mitigation instruments in Indonesia, especially in the energy sector.

• As a means of national discussion related to the issue of using market-based instruments in climate change mitigations and supporting the achievement of the country’s national NDC.

The speakers, among others:

• Director General of Climate Change, MoEF

• Deputy for Coordination on Energy, Natural Resources, and Environmental Protection, CMEA

• Director General of New, Renewable Energy, and Energy Conservation, MEMR

• Senior Adviser to the Minister of Environment and Forestry and National Focal Point for UNFCCC, MoEF

• Director General for Electricity, MEMR

• Head of Industry Research and Development Center, MoI

• Head of National Fiscal Policy, MoF

• Director for Regional and Sectoral Resources Mobilization, MoEF

• Assistant to the Special Envoy on Climate Change A national seminar on Carbon Market and Carbon Pricing Instruments also plan to be held on late October 2018. Development of PMR Indonesia Websites, and other communications materials. For extensive outreach, a special website was established and

launched on October 1st,2017 (www.pmr- indonesia.org.) For communications and awareness raising, the project produced brochures and other communications/campaign materials that currently being distributed and used to campaign and promote the PMR’s program and activities. The communication material includes: leaflet and brochures, monthly/quarterly bulletin, booklets, etc. (copies are available at www.pmr- indonesia.org). Public Perception Survey on MBI related issues in December 2017. One public perception survey has been completed in late 2017 and another one is being prepared for 2018. The 2017 survey shows that MBI understanding is growing and some key messages from the survey were taken, e.g. that MBI is effective to encourage mitigation actions, emissions units should be accessible for all stakeholder, etc. The perception survey indicated that the project should include specific outputs on communicating results to stakeholders and engaging stakeholders during all stages of the Implementation Phase. The activities under those outputs will demonstrate the value of the project which may strengthen the Government’s appreciation of the results and recommendations, and therefore make it more likely that the Government will support the approval of results and recommendations for post-project implementation.

Comments:

This component is being and continuously be implemented in parallel with the

other components of PMR program.

4. PROGRESS, CHALLENGES, AND LESSONS LEARNED

Important policy or regulatory developments related to the Grant’s objectives and

activities:

1. Issuance of Government Regulation No. 46/2017 on Environmental Economic

Instruments.

On 10 November 2017, the Indonesian government issued Government Regulation No. 46 of 2017 on Environmental Economic Instruments (“GR 46/2017”), which came into effect on the same date. GR 46/2017 was issued as the implementing regulation of Articles 42 and 43 of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Environmental economic instruments are a set of economic policies designed to encourage each stakeholder to carry out an effective and efficient environmental management and boost public compliance with precautionary principles and environmental sustainability in Indonesia. In principle, GR 46/2017 provides a reward for any party that preserves and protects the environment; and on the other hand, punishment/liability for any party that causes pollution or damage to the environment. It is hoped that the implementation of GR 46/2017 will create a balance between the utilization of natural resources and environmental protection and management. There are three environmental economic instruments under GR 46/2017, namely: i) economic activities and development planning; ii) environmental funding; and iii) incentive and/or disincentive; all of which are divided into sub-instruments. Several key sub-instruments of the environmental economic instruments, are set out below:

Compensation/Reward Based on Article 10 of GR 46/2017, the government will grant compensation/reward to any party that provides environmental services (provider) to protect and preserve the environment, among others:

• water system protection;

• biodiversity protection;

• carbon absorption and storage;

• preservation of natural beauty; and/or

• other environmental services (including natural resources provisioning, environmental and natural regulation, and preservation of cultural values; also includes, among others, waste storage/stockpiling and waste purifier services or sink).

In addition, it is to be noted that compensation/reward shall be implemented based on an underlying cooperation agreement between the government and environmental services provider. Environmental Guarantee Fund In principle, GR 46/2017 obliges any party/activities causing pollution or damage to the environment to provide environmental guarantee funds, of which the fund shall be used by the government to restore the damaged and/or polluted environmental quality. The forms of guarantee funds, among others, are reclamation guarantee fund, post-mining guarantee fund and hazardous waste management insurance.

Article 22 paragraph (1) of GR 46/2017 stipulates that the guarantee funds shall be provided in the forms of time deposit, joint account, bank guarantee, insurance policy and/or other forms in accordance with prevailing laws. Please note that some of the guarantee funds are not new, since in practice, several forms of the guarantee fund have been implemented by the government before, among others: environment pollution insurance, which applies to a waste management company based on Article 8 of Minister of Environment Regulation No. 18 of 2009 on Licensing Procedures of Hazardous Waste Management; and reclamation guarantee fund and post-mining guarantee fund, which applies to a mining company based on Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 7 of 2014. Incentive In order to encourage environmental protection and sustainability, GR 46/2017 adopts the economic benefit approach. Based on Article 31 paragraph (2) of GR 46/2017, the government will grant certain incentives/benefits for parties (including company) with activities involving positive impacts to the environment, among others, as follows:

• liability relief;

• convenience and/or allowance of requirements for activities;

• facilities and/or assistance;

• encouragement and guidance;

• recognition and/or award; and/or

• public announcement to acknowledge positive performance.

GR 46/2017 does not mention the specific form of incentive which will be granted by the government. In addition, based on information we gathered from a relevant government institution, implementation of Article 31 paragraph (2) of GR 46/2017 is still pending to issuance of its implementing regulation. However, although its implementation is still pending, in principle there are similar forms of incentives which are already regulated under other regulations, e.g. exemption of import duty for waste producer company and waste management company based on Minister of Finance Reg. No. 101/PMK.04/2007 on the Exemption of Duty on Equipments and Materials Used to Prevent Environment Pollution. Tax Pursuant to Article 38 of GR 46/2017, the government will apply provincial taxes (pajak pusat) and district/local taxes (pajak daerah) to any party with business and/or activities utilizing natural resources, among others, related to the utilization of groundwater, surface water, edible bird’s nest, non-metal and rock, motor vehicle fuel and motor vehicle. In principle, such provision is similar with and already implemented by the government, according to Article 2 of Law No. 28 of 2009 on Local Tax and Retribution (“Local Tax and Retribution Law”). Therefore, in principle there are no new types of taxes (i.e. environmental tax) under GR 46/2017. Nevertheless, GR 46/2017 sets out environmental impact criteria, which as a result, by a business or activity, would affect the basis of tax charge (dasar pengenaan pajak). However, at the moment, there are no clear mechanisms on how the government will implement it. Retribution/Levies

In addition to taxes, based on GR 46/2017, the government also imposes general services retribution (Retribusi Jasa Umum) to a waste producer company that use services, facilities and infrastructure for waste management provided by the government. Similar to taxes, such general service retribution has been stipulated by the government under Local Tax and Retribution Law. Under GR 46/2017, the government will charge retribution tariff based on the amount of services utilized. In addition, Article 40 paragraph (3) of GR 46/2017 also authorizes the government to charge retribution tariff on a progressive basis according to the characteristic and volume of the waste garbage produced by parties/activities. However, GR 46/2017 does not provide a clear mechanism on how the government will implement it. Award/Appreciation The government also provides an award/appreciation to any party that contributes to environmental protection and management. Pursuant to Article 50 paragraph (1) of GR 46/2017, the government will grant such award/appreciation in the form of money and/or other forms of appreciation. However, based on information we gathered from a relevant government institution, granting of the award under GR 46/2017 is still pending for the issuance of its implementing regulation.

2. Issuance of Presidential Regulation No 77 Year 2018 on Environmental Fund Management

As a complement to the issuance of Government Regulation No. 46/2017 on Environmental Economic Instruments, the government of Indonesia on September 2018 has concluding the inter-ministerial discussions and agreement for the establishment of the Public Service Agency (BLU) institution, named the Agency for Environmental Fund Management (BPDLH). The Presidential regulation which establishes the agency just recently issued as PR No. 77/2018 on Environmental Fund Management. The initial tasks of the Public Service Agency is to develop and implement mechanisms for REDD+ incentive distribution in result-based manner, as the international support for REDD+ is currently available. However, the upcoming BPDLH’s operation procedures is being discussed by related ministries to enable result-based incentive mechanism for sectors other than forestry. The BPDLH establishment will then become another readiness element for implementation of market-based instrument in Indonesia, in particular result-based payment. Challenges: Climate change is gaining attention and commitment of the Government of Indonesia. More and more sectoral policies are issued or being developed to cope with climate change challenges. Whilst this is an overall positive development, both for PMR and low carbon development, there might be aspects that will need better inter-ministerial harmonization. CMEA, as one of the coordination entities in Indonesia, is working closely with sectors to identify overlaps/gaps and improve the policy frameworks where necessary. Upcoming election is also a potential challenge, as at this stage both candidates have not

yet developed and elucidated their vision, mission, program and strategies. However, the

Ministry of National Development Planning (BAPPENAS) is currently finalizing the

development of Indonesian Low Carbon Development Planning (PPRK) initiative which will

be outlined in the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) 2020-2024.

BAPPENAS has targeted to finalize the draft RPJM 2020-2024 before the start of election,

and as always, Bappenas (and the National Election Commission) will obligate presidency

candidates include the RPJM 2020-2024 into their vision, mission and program.

This however, still not a guarantee that specific issues such as carbon pricing and market

mechanisms for climate change mitigation.

Delayed issuance on sectoral MRV regulations will also pose a risk on the full implementation of a sectoral obligatory RV system. However, this does not fully prevent the government/sectoral-ministries from continuing to carry out sectoral reporting obligations using the existing regulation (Presidential Regulation 61/2011 - on National Action Plan on GHG Emission Reductions) – as the legal basis. Lessons learned: Involve key stakeholders throughout the dialogue process. Changes in government

regimes often encourage policy changes that sometimes occur quickly in a short time. This

changes occassionally create disharmony among institutions that culminate in the non-

synchronization of inter-ministerial policies. Proactive engagement of key stakeholders in

early stage of the process will be useful in reducing the disharmonization of policies

between ministries and agencies. With updated information acquired by CMEA (as one

among coordination entities), PMR project could quickly adapt or fine-tune its activities in

accordance with the newest policy development or contribute in the policy development

processes.

Additional: Lessons from the 2017 perception survey indicated that the project should include specific outputs on communicating results to stakeholders and engaging stakeholders during all stages of the Implementation Phase. The activities under those outputs will demonstrate the value of the project which may strengthen the Government’s appreciation of the results and recommendations, and therefore make it more likely that the Government will support the approval of results and recommendations for post-project implementation.

Important changes in the technical design or approach related to the Grant’s activities:

Developments: n/a Challenges: n/a Lessons learned: n/a

Key capacity issues (implementation, technical, financial management, procurement)

related to the Grant’s activities:

Developments:

• As reported in previous ISR, several relevant ministries were developing MRV system of GHG emission both in national level and sectoral level, without proper inter-ministerial coordination. Integration is needed to ensure systems’ effectiveness, efficiency, and compatibility among different MRV systems. the team has identified overlaps among different systems in data collection process owned by MoEF, MEMR and MOI.

• However, the current capacity to develop seamless integration among reporting system is still lacking. MoI, MEMR, and MoEF proposed to CMEA for PMR to support the system integration (linking), for example to link the web-based reporting system at MEMR, MoEF and MoI.

• After series of trainings and capacity building workshops conducted for working groups members in 2017, the team had identified that awareness and knowledge of industries and industry associations on the topics of MRV and market-based instrument are also insufficient to smoothly move the PMR program further.

Challenges:

• Different MRV systems are being developed without proper inter-ministerial coordination, and without a clear reference to types of MRV which often leads to confusion because the nature of MRV- related activities differs per context and application. Not to mention, several Ministries have their own different modalities for GHG emission reporting.

• Trainings are needed to bring the private sectors understanding at the same level. Different target sectors may require different modules of the training, depending on which type of guideline they will use (i.e. cement using CSI protocol, others using IPCC GL 2006, etc.)

Lessons learned:

• Promoting a system for inter-ministerial coordination and policy harmonization mechanism under the CMEA is critical. The mechanism should promote an open atmosphere for a continuous and gradual discussion process, resulting in mutual agreement and mutual understanding to achieve a common goal in order to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining national economic growth - which in its implementation is sometimes contradictory.

• A tailored training program (and training modules) should be developed by the ministry to facilitate a continuous learning process for its stakeholders, especially the relevant private sectors in power generations and energy intensive industries.

Coordination with other carbon pricing initiatives, including those funded by other donors:

Developments:

A couple of carbon pricing-related initiatives funded by other donors are described as below:

1. Global Green-Growth Initiatives (GGGI) Program on Energy Sector

One of the GGGI program in Indonesia is to develop a study on energy sector’s NDC review.

GGGI, UNDP and Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has been discussing possibilities for GGGI to jointly support the works on formulization of cap for power sector. The support can be in form of a study and/or dialogue facilitation. The support’s scope and modalities are now under discussion and the actual works in expected to start in October 2018.

Challenges: As each program has its own project modalities, the decision on cooperation’s scope has to follow the applicable procedures. The different stakeholders also contribute to additional time and efforts to appropriately explain the cooperation plan. Lessons learned: n/a

2. Danida Initiatives in Power Sector

The current support from Danida in power sector includes energy audits for power plants. PMR Indonesia has provided input to MEMR so that the energy audit can also cover identification of mitigation potentials. Other Danida output is the technology catalogue for power where it provides standard CAPEX and OPEX for different power plant technologies. The report and its values is used in the GHG profiling study, in particular during development of MACC. Challenges: n/a Lessons learned: To be well informed about other program’s output proved to be beneficial to avoid duplication as well as using resources efficiently.

3. GIZ Program in Climate Change

One of GIZ Programs named Policy Advice for Environment and Climate Change (PAKLIM) supports Bappenas and MoI in identifying mitigation options and developing strategies to implement measures to reduce GHG emissions, including in industry sector. Since 2012, PAKLIM supports MoI as well as industrial actors on the development of various tools in sub-sectoral level, such as development of NAMAs in industrial estate, cement, fertilizer and pulp and paper industry, development of technical guideline on CO2 emission calculation and MRV guideline for cement industry, development of technical guideline on GHG emission calculation for fertilizer industry, and various GHG and non GHG related capacity buildings for industry sectors.

PAKLIM new phase which starts in 2017-2020 only focuses in selected sub-sectors, including cement and pulp and paper. PMR Indonesia envisions a joint preparation and implementation of a cooperation with PAKLIM. Identification of potential of cooperation with PMR Indonesia has been discussed in a formal meeting facilitated by MoI. The joint-cooperation is made not based on co-funded activities and not necessarily shared resources; rather, each party will support MoI in different area/level of activities under the same umbrella, which in this case on cement MRV guideline. The overall objective remains the same, which is to improve and ensure that the cement MRV guideline is implemented in the facility level. Amongst 41 plants of cement industry in Indonesia, 7 plants were already

assessed (both for GHG emission reported and GHG emission reduction) by PAKLIM during 2015-2017. Hence, it was agreed PAKLIM will conduct the assessment related with GHG emission and GHG emission reduction in other 3 plants. Whilst, PMR Indonesia will conduct assessment only for GHG emission data in 3 other plants. Although PAKLIM and PMR are both working in different area (i.e plants), however each result can give inputs and feedback to each other, and the total plants assessed will be 6 plants.

Moreover, PAKLIM will also improve the GHG data collection conducted by PMR in pulp and paper sub-sector, and support the pulp and paper industry in developing guideline on mitigation action measures.

Challenges:

• Although both parties shared the same partner involved in MoI (Research and Development Centre for Green Industry and Environment/IHLH), however there is a difference in contact person in-charged for each donor-supported programme. For this issue, one should understand the nature of work within IHLH itself, in which every donor-supported program shall be accompanied with one designated person (in echelon 3 and 4 level). In this case, The Division of Environment is designated to PAKLIM, and Division of Energy is designated to PMR; although both programmes share the same objectives. Both divisions have different level of knowledge, different commitment, involvement and engagement to the programmes. This situation then became the root of challenges in implementing the joint-cooperation between PAKLIM and PMR, as not to mention, between both divisions itself there is lack of coordination.

• For both PAKLIM and PMR, mostly the communication with MoI in daily basis also related with several certain MoI staff in each of the divisions. The loss of key staff members (due to rotation and other reason) were found to create gaps in the flow of information between the two divisions.

Lessons learned:

• Although it is not necessarily cutting the project costs of each party, the joint-cooperation has avoided activity duplications due to lack of coordination within MoI itself. This cooperation can be considered effective and beneficial not only to MoI but also to PMR and PAKLIM. All parties are able to reach more sources of focus areas for MRV pilot in cement industry, as access of information from the results of all activities are shared.

• Communicating the joint cooperation to MoI is the key to ensure successful of activity planning and to gain the same level of acknowledgement from MoI related with each party’s needs (both have different programme indicators to achieve) and limitations (both parties have each own limitation related with budget allocations, scheme of budget disbursement to MoI, etc). Thus, MoI will recognize that both parties have their own different limitations.

• During the implementation of activities, communication between project implementers are important throughout the stages, to ensure that both parties are informed on each other’s’ progress.

Stakeholder engagement related to the Grant’s activities:

Developments:

Stakeholders were engaged through various means. At the 1st level, engagement managed through the establishment of Project Steering Committee (SC) and 3 technical working groups (WGs). The memberships of the SC and WGs consists of representatives from relevant line ministries (CMEA, Bappenas, Min. of Finance, MEMR, MOI, MoEF, etc.), and also from relevant private sectors (industry and industry associations). Engagement at 2nd level, were managed through various training workshops and capacity building program, were wider audience from government and private sectors (in energy and industry) were involved in the disseminations, trainings and knowledge sharing activities. Engagement at 3rd level, were managed through seminars and public discussions workshops at national level – involving general public (including non-energy private sectors, civil societies, NGOs, academia, etc.). During 2018, there were 5 events (public discussions at national level were held jointly with ministries) – on the topics of MRV and MBI to scaling up national mitigation actions.

Various tools and media were also developed to communicate and disseminate the PMR programs, namely:

• Briefing Papers / Policy Papers

• Website (www.pmr-indonesia.org)

• Newsletter, brochures, infopack, etc.

• Multimedia presentation materials

Challenges:

Inter-ministerial Dialogues Most of the works in PMR requires strong support and involvement from relevant institutions/ministries. To get all stakeholders into a dialogue and come to an agreement is the main challenge. This is a multi-stakeholders’ process which requires intensive consultations and dialogues – which potentially could delay program implementation.

To mitigate this risk, the project includes several approaches. During the early implementation, consultations were organized with key stakeholders to increase their understanding of the project and establish networks of collaboration. Once implementation of the project begins, key stakeholders meet on a regular basis so that they are aware of the progress of the project and contribute to the project. The technical working group were established to facilitate open and transparent inter-ministerial dialogues. Under effective and strong leadership (of CMEA), this arrangement is a good set-up to build consensus/agreement among institutions involved. Change in Government staffs or structure There is a risk is that changes in government staffs/structure could result in a change in leadership among the key government bodies, with implications for the loss of institutional memory. Between January and September 2017, there has been changes of staffs (heads of technical or administrative departments) at CMEA, MEMR, and MoI.

To mitigate this risk, capacity building activities were conducted through series of training involving key individuals from relevant institutions. Knowledge preservation also carried-out through development of PMR project database within the PMR Indonesia website, accessible to all stakeholders. The project also undertook targeted awareness-raising activities to secure high-level commitment from key decision-makers and foster a sufficient number of project champions

to sustain project outcomes following project completion.

Managing Political Risks Perhaps the most important risks to the project are sustainability/replicability and coordination. There is a risk that results produced by project will not be sustained beyond the project lifetime. There is also a risk that project results will not be scaled up. This risk is largely due to political commitment to apply policy reforms. Given that these results emerged through external financing and support, key project results must be sufficiently institutionalized if the larger outcomes are to be sustainable. Learning from other ICPs also facing this issue is important and welcome.

For this reason, the project always engaging stakeholders during all stages of the project implementation phase which may strengthen the Government’s commitment of the results and recommendations, and therefore make it more likely that the Government will support the approval of results and recommendations for post-project implementation. Project will take efforts to mainstreaming the PMR program to overall national strategies and plans.

Lessons learned:

Strong government leadership and continuous engagement is important in the managing the conflicting priorities and interests of each institution/ministry. The project is responsible to facilitate the dialogues process to be constructive and point towards achievement of planned (targeted) output. Additionally, the project must select activities to strengthen institutional mechanisms for improved coordination and collaboration. These include negotiating best consultative processes and memoranda of understanding.

Champions (key-individuals) within each institution needs to be supported/encouraged to anticipate changes of leadership in the key government bodies, to preserve and retain the institutional memory.

Other issues related to the Grant’s activities:

Developments: n/a Challenges: n/a

Lessons learned: n/a

Please describe any developments, challenges and lessons learned regarding any other issue

related to the achievement of Grant’s objectives and the implementation of the Grant’s activities.

5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

In this Section, please provide any additional information that may be relevant for the achievement

of the Grant’s objectives and/or the implementation of the Grant’s activities. Please also provide any

relevant information related to carbon pricing and the use of market-based instruments for climate

change mitigation.

The year 2017 and 2018 are important years that provide positive momentum for climate change mitigation efforts in Indonesia. During this period, the Indonesian government has issued several important decisions and regulations related to climate change mitigation efforts, including (among others):

• Government Regulation on Environmental Economic Instruments, which provide policy basis for MBI and mandate to establish ETS before 2024; and

• Presidential Regulation concerning Management of Environmental Funds, which established a fund management agency with climate change incentive distribution tasks.

In response to this and at the same time utilizing the existing momentum and positive energy of sectoral ministries, the three technical working groups of PMR recommended to CMEA that some of the main activities of PMR components be accelerated. The decision to accelerate had allowed three (of five) main components of PMR to be completed in 2018, namely the development of emission profiles and MACC, the development of MRV system design, and preparation of pilot implementation for MRV. The completion of the study for the development of MBI options for the power sector and selected industrial sub-sectors are also underway and ready to be piloted will support readiness to develop MBI pilot(s) in selected sub-sectors. This has left us with two remaining activities, namely piloting the MRV and piloting the MBI in power and selected industry sub- energy sectors. Based on our projection with UNDP, the funding support for PMR Indonesia activities will run-out by mid of 2019, when the remaining activities completed. The 2019 is a political year, in which Indonesia will hold a general election (for presidents and parliaments). At this moment, we will face a big challenge to ensure that (when the transition takes place in 2019), all achievements of PMR can be secured and continued by the new period of administrations. For this reason, it is important for PMR to prepare measures to ensure that sustainability and continuation of all programs and achievements of PMR program, among others by: (1) ensuring the emission reductions policy in energy sector (especially for power generation and industry) are incorporated into the upcoming Mid-Term Development Plan for 2020-2024, (2) ensuring sufficient (APBN) budget will be available to support the continuation of the MRV system implementation, and including the further implementation of the selected MBI options, (3) ensure that relevant capacities and knowledge related to MRV and MBI have been established and institutionalized within the responsible units.

Faced with this challenge, Indonesia would like to propose additional support from PMR to

ensure that the works and discussions at the technical working groups can continue

throughout the transition in 2019.

Annex: PMR INDONESIA

LIST OF MEETINGS AND EVENTS

2018

No. Date Activity Remark Type

1 9 – 10 January 2018 Industry WG Meeting #18 Discussions of emission baselines and preparation of

MRV Guidelines for Fertilizer Industry W1

2 Friday, January 12, 2018 Site Visit to Fertilizer Industry Field Visit to PT. Pupuk Sriwijaya. SV1

3 Friday, January 12, 2018 Power WG Meeting #11 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (3) FGD1

4 Thursday, January 18, 2018 MBI WG Meeting #6 Follow-up Meeting: Implementation of Study Options for

Market-Based Climate Change Mitigation Policy Options. M1

5 Thursday, January 25, 2018 Power WG Meeting #12 Power working group general meeting M1

6 Friday, January 26, 2018 Power WG Meeting #13 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (4) FGD2

7 Tuesday, January 30, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTU PT. Lestari Banten Energi. SV1

8 Wednesday, January 31, 2018 PMR Steering Committee Meeting Discussions of carbon market and GHG National Action

Plans (RAN GRK). GCM

9 Friday, February 2, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTU PT. Cikarang Listrindo. SV2

10 Monday, February 5, 2018 Power WG Meeting #14 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (5) FGD3

11 6 – 7 February 2018 Industry WG Meeting #19 Technical Workshop for Calculating GHG Emissions in

Textile Industry (3). W2

12 Wednesday, February 7, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTU PLTU Jateng 2 Adipala, PT Indonesia Power. SV3

13 Thursday, February 8, 2018 Site Visit to Textile Industry Field Visit to PT. Sritex. SV2

14 Friday, February 9, 2018 Power WG Meeting #15 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (6) FGD4

15 Monday, February 12, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTGU Tanjung Priok, PT. Indonesia Power. SV4

16 14 – 15 February 2018 Industry WG Meeting #20 Discussions of emission profile and baseline for Cement

Industry W3

17 Wednesday, February 14, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTU 1 Cirebon, PT. Cirebon Elektrik Power. SV5

17 Wednesday, February 21, 2018 Power WG Meeting #16 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (7) FGD5

18 Monday, February 26, 2018 Site Visit to Steel Industry Field Visit to PT Krakatau Steel. SV3

19 Wednesday, February 28, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTDG Pesanggaran, PT Indonesia Power. SV6

20 Wednesday, February 28, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #21 Working Group Planning Meeting 2018 M1

21 Friday, March 2, 2018 Power WG Meeting #17 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (8) FGD6

22 6 – 7 March 2018 Industry WG Meeting #22 Discussions of emission profile and baseline for Pulp and

Paper Industry W4

23 Wednesday, March 7, 2018 Site Visit to Power Generation Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Field Visit

to PLTDG Trisakti, PT.PLN Kalimatan Selatan dan Tengah. SV7

24 Thursday, March 8, 2018 Power WG Meeting #18 Discussion on Emission Cap-Setting for Power Sector (1). FGD7

25 8 – 9 March 2018 Industry WG Meeting #23 Discussions of emission profile and baseline and

identification of MACC for Chemical Industry W5

26 Monday, March 12, 2018 MBI WG Meeting #7 Potential of Market-based Instrument and ITMOs to

comply NDC Targets. FGD1

27 14 – 15 March 2018 Power WG Meeting #19 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (9) FGD8

28 15 – 16 March 2018 Industry WG Meeting #24 Discussion on 1st draft report on GHG Emission Profile

and MACC for Industry sector M2

29 19 – 20 March 2018 Industry WG Meeting #25 Discussions of emission profile and baseline and

identification of MACC for Ceramic and Glass Industry W6

30 Thursday, March 22, 2018 Power WG Meeting #20 Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Progress

Discussion on GHG Emission Profile Report in the Power Sector.

M2

31 Friday, March 23, 2018 Power and Industry WG Meeting Study of Electricity and Industrial GHG Emission Profile

Profiles - Evaluation of the Study of GHG Emission Profile Assessment for Power and energy-intensive Industry.

GCM

32 26 – 27 March 2018 MBI WG Meeting #8 Follow-up to the Implementation of Study Options for

Market-based Climate Change Mitigation Policy. M2

33 Monday, March 26, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #26 Discussions of emission profile and baseline for Food and

Beverage Industry (1) M3

34 Monday, April 2, 2018 Power WG Meeting #21 Discussion on Emission Cap-Setting for Power Sector (2). FGD9

35 Monday, April 2, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #19 Discussions of emission profile and baseline for

Mitigation of Nitric Acid Industry. FGD1

36 Monday, April 2, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #20 Discussions of emission profile and baseline for Food and

Beverage Sub-Sector Industry (2) FGD2

37 Wednesday, April 4, 2018 Power WG Meeting #22 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (10) FGD10

38 Thursday, April 5, 2018 Site Visit to Pulp&Paper Industry Field Visit to PT. Bukit Muria Jaya. SV4

39 Friday, April 6, 2018 Site Visit to Pulp&Paper Industry Field Visit to PT. Fajar Surya Wisesa. SV5

40 Friday, April 6, 2018 Power WG Meeting #23 MRV System Development-Discussion of Online GHG

Emission Reporting System Power Sector FGD11

41 Tuesday, April 10, 2018 Power WG Meeting #24 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (11) FGD12

42 Wednesday, April 11, 2018 MBI WG Meeting #9 Discussion of IBP Options to Support Climate Change

Mitigation Policy. M3

43 Thursday, April 12, 2018 Power WG Meeting #25 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (12) FGD13

44 Thursday, April 12, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #21 Data synchronization for Online GHG Monitoring System

(SIM GRK) and the National Industrial Information System (SIINAS).

M4

45 Thursday, April 12, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #22 Discussion on 1st draft report on GHG Emission Profile

and MACC for Industry sector M5

46 16 – 17 April 2018 Industry WG Meeting #23 Technical Workshop for Calculating GHG Emissions in

Chemical Industry (4). W7

47 Monday, April 16, 2018 Site Visit to Food Industry Field Visit to PT. Mayora Indah, Tbk. SV6

48 Tuesday, April 17, 2018 Power WG Meeting #26 MRV System Development-Discussion of Comparative

Study of Calculation Methodology of CO2 Emissions in Power Sector

FGD14

49 Tuesday, April 17, 2018 Site Visitto Food Industry Field Visit to PT. Dagsap Endura Eatora. SV7

50 Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Power WG Meeting #27 MRV System Development - Continuing Discussion on

Draft of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (13) FGD15

51 Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Site Visit to Food Industry Field Visit to PT. Bungasari Flour Mills. SV8

52 Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Site Visit o Beverage Industryt Field Visit to PT. Torabika Eka Semesta. SV9

53 Thursday, April 19, 2018 Site Visit to Food Industry Field Visit to PT. Jawamanis Rafinasi. SV10

54 Thursday, April 19, 2018 Site Visit to Food Industry Field Visit to PT. Alu Aksara Pratama. SV11

55 Friday, April 20, 2018 Power WG Meeting #28 Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Progress

Discussion on GHG Emission Profile Report in the Power Sector

M3

56 Friday, April 20, 2018 Site Visit to Food Industry Field Visit to PT. SMART. SV12

57 24 – 27 April 2018 Partneship Assembly Meeting (PA18) CMEA and UNDP attending the 18th PA Meeting PA

58 Wednesday, April 25, 2018 Power WG Meeting #29 Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Progress

Discussion on GHG Emission Profile Report in the Power Sector

M4

59 25 – 26 April 2018 Industry WG Meeting #24 Technical Workshop for Calculating GHG Emissions in

Pulp and Paper Industry W8

60 Wednesday, April 25, 2018 Site Visit to Textile Industry Field Visit to PT. Sinar Para Taruna. SV13

61 Thursday, April 26, 2018 Site Visit to Beverage Industry Field Visit to PT. Aneka Coffee. SV14

62 Friday, April 27, 2018 Site Visit to Pulp&Paper Industry Field Visit to PT. Ekamas Fortuna. SV15

63 Monday, April 30, 2018 Power WG Meeting #30 Progress Discussion on Study of Power Sector GHG

Emission Profile. M5

64 Monday, April 30, 2018 Site Visit to Beverage Industry Field Visit to PT. Santos Jaya Abadi. SV16

65 Wednesday, May 2, 2018 Site Visit to Steel Industry Field Visit to PT. Krakatau Posco. SV17

66 Thursday, May 3, 2018 Power WG Meeting #31 MRV System Development - Finalization of Draft of MRV

Guidelines for Power Sector FGD16

67 Thursday, May 3, 2018 Site Visit to Steel Industry Field Visit to PT. Ispatindo. SV18

68 Monday, May 7, 2018 Site Visit to Steel Industry Field Visit to PT. Gunung Garuda. SV19

69 8 – 9 May 2018 Industry WG Meeting #25 Discussions of emission baselines and preparation of

MRV Guidelines for Fertilizer Industry (2) W9

70 Wednesday, May 9, 2018 Power WG Meeting #32 MRV System Development - Preparation for the

Launching of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (1). FGD17

71 11 – 12 May 2018 Power WG Meeting #33 Discussion on Emission Cap-Setting for Power Sector (3). FGD18

72 Monday, May 14, 2018 Power WG Meeting #33 MRV System Development - Preparation for the

Launching of MRV Guidelines for Power Sector (2). FGD19

73 Tuesday, May 15, 2018 Power WG Meeting #34 MRV System Development - Launching Event of MRV

Guidelines for Power Sector FGD20

74 Wednesday, May 16, 2018 Power WG Meeting #35 Emissions Profile Study - Discussion of Final Draft of

Report on GHG Emission Profiles for Power Sector. M6

75 Wednesday, May 16, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #26 Emissions Profile Study - Discussion of Final Draft of

Report on GHG Emission Profiles for Industry Sector. M6

76 Friday, May 18, 2018 MBI WG Meeting #10 Discussion on GHG Emission Profiles and Carbon Pricing

Instruments in Power and Industry Sector. W1

77 Wednesday, May 23, 2018 Site Visit to Fertilizer Industry Field Visit to PT Pupuk Kujang. SV20

78 Monday, May 28, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #27 Discussions of emission baselines for Fertilizer Industry

(3) W10

79 Wednesday, May 30, 2018 Power WG Meeting #36 Study of Power Sector GHG Emission Profile - Discussion

of Final Draft of GHG Emission Profile Report in the Power Sector

M7

80 30 – 31 May 2018 Industry WG Meeting #28 Meeting with the Cement Industry Association on MRV

and MBI Pilot Implementation FGD3

81 Monday, June 4, 2018 Power WG Meeting #37 Discussion on Emission Cap-Setting for Power Sector (4). FGD21

82 Tuesday, June 5, 2018 Power WG Meeting #38 MRV System Development - Dissemination and Training

on MRV Guideliness for Power sector FGD22

83 Wednesday, June 6, 2018 MBI WG Meeting #11 Harmonization of GHG Emission Reporting Systems in the

Power and Industry Sector. FGD2

84 Thursday, June 7, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #29 Emissions Profile Study - Discussion of Final Draft of

Report on GHG Emission Profiles for Industry Sector (2) M7

85 Thursday, June 28, 2018 Power WG Meeting #39 Discussion on Emission Cap-Setting for Power Sector (5). FGD23

86 Friday, June 29, 2018 Power WG Meeting #40 Discussion on Report on Comparative Study of GHG

Emission reporting for Power Sector. M8

87 Friday, July 6, 2018 Power WG Meeting #41 Discussion on Report on Final Draft of GHG Emission

Profile Study for Power Sector. M9

88 Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #30 Emissions Profile Study - Submission and Presentation of

Final Report on GHG Emission Profiles for Industry Sector FGD4

89 Monday, July 16, 2018 PMR Steering Committee Meeting NDC and Carbon Market in Indonesia GCM

90 Tuesday, July 17, 2018 Power WG Meeting #42 Discussion on the Development Power Sector Roadmap

for Reducing GHG Emissions in Indonesia M10

91 Wednesday, July 25, 2018 Industry WG Meeting #31 Emissions Profile Study - Discussion on Facts and

Findings of the Report on GHG Emission Profiles for Industry Sector

M8

92 27 -28 July 2018 Power WG Meeting #43 Development of Online Reporting System for Power

Sector (APPLE - GATRIK) M11

93 Wednesday, August 1, 2018 MBI Event - Carbon Pricing Weekly

Week 1

Carbon Pricing Weekly: Week 1 - Development of Market Based Instruments to Achieve NDC Targets

W1

94 Monday, August 6, 2018 Power WG Meeting #44 Development of Online Reporting System for Power

Sector (APPLE - GATRIK) M12

95 7–8 August 2018 Power WG Meeting #45 Training for Trainers for Online Application for GHG

Emission Calculation and Reporting (APPLE-GATRIK) - session 1

M13

96 Wednesday, August 8, 2018 MBI Event - Carbon Pricing Weekly

Week 2 Carbon Pricing Weekly:

Week 2 - Lesson Learned from Carbon Market FGD4

97 13-14 August 2018 Power WG Meeting Training for Trainers for Online Application for GHG

Emission Calculation and Reporting (APPLE-GATRIK) - session 2

M14

97 Wednesday, August 15, 2018 MBI Event - Carbon Pricing Weekly

Week 3

Carbon Pricing Weekly: Week 3 - Emission Data for Market Based Instruments Implementation

FGD4

98 Tuesday, August 21, 2018 MBI Event - Carbon Pricing Weekly

Week 4 Carbon Pricing Weekly:

Week 4 - National Policy on Market Based Instruments FGD4

99 27-28 August 2018 Power WG Meeting

Launching Event APPLE-GATRIK Dissemination and Training for Online Application for GHG Emission Calculation and Reporting (APPLE-GATRIK) - central region

M14

99 Wednesday, August 29, 2018 MBI Event - Carbon Pricing Weekly

Week 5

Carbon Pricing Weekly: Week 5 - Implementation Strategy for Market Based Instruments based on Cost and Emission Reduction Potention

FGD4

100 3-4 September 2018 Power WG Meeting Dissemination and Training for Online Application for

GHG Emission Calculation and Reporting (APPLE-GATRIK) - western region

M15

101 13-14 September 2018 Power WG Meeting Dissemination and Training for Online Application for

GHG Emission Calculation and Reporting (APPLE-GATRIK) - eastern region

M15