PLASTIC SOEP IS OVERAL - WUR...G.Mauger, - GECC Shipping (incl. fisheries) considered as the main...

89
NZG Martin Heubeck Mick Mellor Eric Meek Keith Fairclough Dan Turner Jane Gollan Nicole Girard Gilles le Guillou Christine Blaize Eric Stienen Wouter Courtens Marc vd Walle Elisa Bravo Rebolledo Susanne Kühn Kees Camphuysen André Meijboom David Fleet Nils Guse Stefan Garthe John Pedersen Helle Schulz Poul Lindhard Hansen Kare Olav Olsen Bergur Olsen Johannes Danielsen Jens-Kjeld Jensen PLASTIC SOEP IS OVERAL 27e NIBI Onderwijsconferentie, 12-jan-2013, Lunteren pdf copy of conference presentation to be used only in school classrooms Jan van Franeker and the Save the North SeaFulmar study group The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Transcript of PLASTIC SOEP IS OVERAL - WUR...G.Mauger, - GECC Shipping (incl. fisheries) considered as the main...

  • NZG

    Martin HeubeckMick MellorEric MeekKeith FaircloughDan TurnerJane GollanNicole Girard Gilles le GuillouChristine BlaizeEric StienenWouter CourtensMarc vd WalleElisa Bravo RebolledoSusanne KühnKees CamphuysenAndré MeijboomDavid FleetNils GuseStefan GartheJohn PedersenHelle SchulzPoul Lindhard HansenKare Olav OlsenBergur OlsenJohannes DanielsenJens-Kjeld Jensen

    PLASTIC SOEP IS OVERAL27e NIBI Onderwijsconferentie,

    12-jan-2013, Lunteren

    pdf copy of conference presentation to be used only

    in school classrooms

    Jan van Franekerand the

    ‘Save the North Sea’Fulmar study group

    The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the

    Environment

  • “a day at sea” as an introduction to marine litter types

  • offshore oil and gasindustry

  • Coastal recreation

  • Shore-based industries

  • agriculture

  • coastal dump sites

    Punta Arenas, Chile

  • Faroe Islands (2009)

  • Los Angeles river, USA

  • smallmarine

    litter

  • INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS

    +colourants, fillers, softeners, anti-oxidants,

    flame-retardants, uv-protectors, biocides,…..

    USER PLASTICS

  • Maximenko 2008 IPRC Climate, vol. 8, no. 2

    Plastic soup… garbage patches

  • Grey PhalaropePhalaropus fulicaria

    Plastic soup in Texel Ferry Harbour

  • PLASTIC SOUP is not

    a ‘distant’ problem,it’s

    EVERYWHERE

    Corsica, April 2011

    © Jan van Franeker

    For short film on this picture see:http://youtu.be/nuHpjKHEsx8

  • why worry about marine litter ?

  • DAMAGE economic

  • Foto G Timmerman (TC)

  • economical damage from litter: possibly over 1.000.000.000 Euro per year !

  • DAMAGE ecological

  • http://marine-litter.gpa.unep.org/

  • Minke WhaleBalaenoptera acutorostrata

    stomach contents of youngMinke Whale

    beachwashed in FrancePhoto: G.Mauger, Groupe d'Étude des Cétacés du Cotentin - GECC

  • Directe doodsoorzaak

    Indirecte effecten• schade maagwand• verminderde maagfunctie• onderdrukt hongergevoel• kleinere maaginhoud• opname giftige chemicaliën

    afname conditie toename sterfteafname broedsucces

    GEVOLGEN VAN HET ETEN VAN PLASTIC :

  • “Plastic Soup”

    effects microscopicplastics on

    filter feeders and on food web ???

  • marine litter = problem

    DAMAGE economical

    DAMAGE ecological

  • http://zeevogelgroep.nl/SchoonStrandTexel2005/

  • Northern Fulmar – Fulmarus glacialis

  • Lesser Black-backed Gull

    Northern Fulmar

  • • talrijk, wijdverspreid, dode vogels op strand• eet allerlei soorten afval• fourageert alléén maar op open zee• hoopt plastic afval op in de maag• integreert vervuilingsniveaus in zijn voedselgebied op zee

    Stormvogels zijn dom

    maar juist daarom misschien …

    een handige graadmeter voor

    afval op zee

  • NetherlandsFulmar-Litter

    monitoring1982 – 20…

    ‘North Sea’Fulmar Study

    2002-20....

  • Average mass ± se of plastics in stomachs of fulmars in the Netherlands (running 5-year arithmetic average for all ages, all plastics)

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1980s(69)

    1995-1999(222)

    1996-2000(258)

    1997-2001(304)

    1998-2002(329)

    1999-2003(294)

    2000-2004(318)

    2001-2005(331)

    2002-2006(304)

    2003-2007(309)

    2004-2008(290)

    2005-2009(226)

    Plastic mass(gram)

    5-year periods (sample size)

    Current 5-year period2005-2009 Netherlands:

    incidence 95 %average nr 27 particles / birdavg mass 0.28 gram / bird

  • Average mass ± se of industrial and user plastics in stomachs of fulmars in the Netherlands (running 5-year arithmetic average for all ages)

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    1980s(69)

    1995-1999(222)

    1996-2000(258)

    1997-2001(304)

    1998-2002(329)

    1999-2003(294)

    2000-2004(318)

    2001-2005(331)

    2002-2006(304)

    2003-2007(309)

    2004-2008(290)

    2005-2009(226)

    INDUSTRIAL plastic mass

    (gram)

    USER plasticmass (gram)

    5 -year periods (sample size)

  • Kwaliteitsdoelstelling (Ecological Quality Objective ‘EcoQO’) voor ZWERFVUIL in de Noordzee

    Kwaliteits meterdood aangespoelde

    Noordse Stormvogels

    Doelstelling< 10 % van de vogels

    heeft> 0.1 gram plastic

    in de maag(alle deelgebieden; voor aaneengesloten

    periode van tenminste 5 jaar)

  • North Sea Regional Pattern (EcoQO performance 2005-2009)

    The pattern indicates major local sources of pollution (rather than ‘ background’ from e.g. Gulf Stream)

    The southern area, in particular the Channel, is most heavily polluted: ±twice the level of that in the Scottish Islands

    1

    2

    3

    5

    4

    Region

    10%target

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    ScottishIslands

    NEEngland

    Channel SE NorthSea

    Skagerrak

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    % of birds with > 0.1 g plastic

  • Canadian Arctic data from Mallory et al. (2006; 2008), Provencher et al 2009 & pers. inf. authors

    North Atlantic comparisonEcoQO performance(% birds with more than 0.1g plastic in stomach)

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    NorthSea

    FaroeIslands

    Iceland ArcticCanada

    10%target

  • doelstelling:Zwerfvuil veroorzaak “geen schade” aan kust en zeemilieu

    Graadmeters : trends in hoeveelheid vuil op kust en in het water, ook voor microplastics, en ‘invloeden van zwerfvuil op het leven in zee *

    * = gemeten aan het eten van plastics door zeedieren, naar het voorbeeld van de stormvogel EcoQO in de Noordzee

    Europese KaderRichtlijn Marien(KRM 2008) :

    “Goede MilieuToestand (GMT) in 2020

  • in regions where fulmar sampling is not possible other options for bio-monitoring have to be explored

    Photo: G.Mauger, Groupe d'Étude des Cétacés du Cotentin - GECCmammals ? turtles ? fishes ? Other birds ?

    European Marine Strategy Framework Directive :

  • Harm ?

  • North Sea 2003-2007 95% plastic incidence;

    0.31 gram per bird

  • HARM?

    Fulmar wreck 2004:highly unusual sex & age

    compositionserious deficiencies in down

    plumage illogical reproductive decisions

    Suggesting a disturbed endocrine hormonal system !

    Hormonal disruptions are a known effect of the types of contaminants accumulated by fulmars through food and/or plastic ingestion

    From Honolulu 2011 5IMDC presentation: Chemicals in marine plastics and risks: a mass mortality incident among fulmars in 2004 showed many characters of hormonal disturbance,

    potentially related to plastic ingestion

    Foto: Johan Kroll

  • Fulmar - symbol of the Save the North Seamarine litter campaign

    Fulmar is a

    high quality scientific toolplus a

    strong public relations tool

    to create the political and public awareness that is essential to accept and support measures

    aimed at the reduction of litter in the marine environment

    John Mouat Rick Nickerson Melanie Schultz van Haegen(NL North Sea Deputy Minister)

  • Salko de Wolf, EcoMare

    to the benefit of all marine life

    G.Mauger, - GECC

  • Shipping (incl. fisheries) considered as the main source of marine litter.

    (measures: e.g. EU Directive on

    Port Reception Facilities)

  • remains of balloonsaverage 6 per km

    (Texel, april 2005)

  • IMARES

    Thank you for

    listening !