PLASMA PROCESSING FOR FUEL CELL - RSPhys - ANU · Nowadays, fuel cells are being developed to power...
Transcript of PLASMA PROCESSING FOR FUEL CELL - RSPhys - ANU · Nowadays, fuel cells are being developed to power...
PLASMA PROCESSINGPLASMA PROCESSINGFOR FUEL CELLFOR FUEL CELL
A. Caillard, C. Charles, D. Ramdutt,R. W. BoswellSP3 - PRL – RSPhysSE – ANU Canberra,
Australia
P. BraultGREMI - CNRS, Université d’Orléans, France
J. Durand, S. RoualdesIEMM CNRS- Université de Montpellier II,
France
C. Coutanceau, C. LamyLACCO CNRS – Université de Poitiers, France
The greenhouse effects of current CO2 emissions have resulted in extensiveinternational research on the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier for a loweremissions society.
From 1960, NASA has been using fuel cells in space and military operations (GEMINI)Nowadays, fuel cells are being developed to power cars, homes (stationaryapplication) and mobile electronic devices.
Fuel cell Technologies
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd(26 jan 2004)
NTT DoCoMo (30sep 2004)
FC classe A (june 2004)
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
1 kW electricmodule (GEMINI)
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel cell (PEM)
Fuel cell
PEMFC
Proton Exchange
Membrane FC
PAFC
Phosphoric acid
FC
MCFC
Melted carbonate
FC
SOFC
Solid Oxide FC
Electrolyte Proton exchange
membrane Phosphoric acid Melted carbonate Solid Oxide
Temperature 70 - 100°C 150 -210°C 650 -1000°C 800 -1000°C
Transport Ion H+ H+ CO3- O2-
Combustible H2 & Methanol H2 H2 H2 & CH4
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Anode Cathode
e-
Cathodic fuelAnodic fuel
Electrolyte
Transportion
Electrodes Requirements :-High ionic and electronic conductivities-High fuel diffusion coefficient-High chemical and thermal stabilities-High and selective reactivity of theanode and cathode chemical reactions
Electrolyte Requirements :-High ionic conductivities-Low electronic conductivities-High chemical and thermal stabilities-Low fuel permeability
Protonic solution
2H+ + 1/2 O2 + 2e- H2O
Catalyst
cathode
H2 2H+ + 2e-
anode
CxHxO CO2 + 2H+ + 2e-Catalyst
Chemical PEM Fuel cell : structure
Electrodes(Gas diffusion layer and
catalyst layer )
H2O / O2
H2 O2
Membrane ElectrodeAssembly(MEA)
Bipolar plate(gas feeding channel )
Proton exchangemembrane
H2
Active catalyst
Inactive catalyst
Protonic Membrane
Carbon particleBacking support
e- e-
H+
e-
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
H+
H+
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Chemical PEM Fuel cell : structure
1 – Backing (carbon cloth)
2 - Electrode mixture : a) Carbon particles (50-150 nm) (50 µm) b) Nafion polymer (50 µm) c) Catalyst nano-particles (50 µm)
3 - Nafion membrane (150/250 µm)A
1
1
2
23
100 µm
H+
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
SEMSEM
Chemical PEM Fuel cell : ProcessingCarbon support (nano-particles,nanofibers, …) + Catalyst salt
Catalyst supported on carbon
Colloidal, carbonyl methods
Proton solution
Ink ( Catalyst supported on carbon,proton solution, alcohol)
Isopropanol
Electrode supported on abacking
Spraying, painting methods
Auto-supported ProtonExchange Membrane
Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA)
Hot pressing methods
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Catalyst
Protonpolymer
Catalyst
Catalyst
Protonpolymer
Catalyst
Plasma PEM Fuel cell
Platinum price dramatically increases
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Only 10% of the platinum load is active in a chemical fuel cell. To decrease platinumload (increase platinum activity), the electrode structure must be optimized :
Three separate layers (MEA)with hot press assembly
US$/carUS$/gg/car
7503025
Platinum for a 50 kW car (6 persons) :
Three progressive layerscontinuously deposited by plasma
processing (in situ assembly) :
30
20
US$/g
2000 2002 2004
Catalyst, carbon and polymer deposition
1 - Catalyst clusters deposition onuncatalysed chemical electrode (≈GDL)by plasma sputtering
2 - Carbon nanostructure deposition onbacking by plasma enhanced chemicalvapor deposition and by plasma sputtering
Catalyst clusters deposition on this newgas diffusion layer
3 – Polymer deposition by PECVD and plasmasputtering
4 – Proton Polymer deposition by PECVD
Plasma processing for PEM Fuel cell
Carbon particles (Vulcan CX72, 40 nm)surronded by platinum no-particles
Electrode
Electrolyte
Carbon Nonofibre (CNF) deposited on a carbon paper (FCbacking) + platinum deposition by a chemical method
Proton membrane deposited on achemical electrode
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Platinum catalyst
Carbon
Polymer
CATAPULP (GREMI, Orleans, France)
-
+
Pump
+
Catalyst GDL
TCP Antenna
Argon in
++
+ +
+
+
Vc
BA (L)
13.56 MHz(0/20gauss)
Z (mm)
0
170
PIGLET (PRL, Canberra, Australia)
GDL
Catalyst
Vc < 0
++
+
+
+
+
++
+
+
+
++
+
+
++
++
+
Double saddle antennaArgon in
BA (π)
13.56 MHz(0/40 gauss)
(0/200 gauss)
Z (mm)
0
Catalyst deposition by plasma sputteringFuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
After Pt deposition
(0.08 mg/cm²) – 20 µbar
Before Pt deposition
Pt : 0.08 mg/cm² : clusters size φPt< 10 nm
GDL (80% Carbone + 20% PTFE – porosity ~ 50 %)
Catalyst Sputtering on (into) GDLPt deposition morphology, MEB
J. Durand, IEM, Montpellier
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Proton polymerCatalyst + Carbon
Catalyst + carbon
?Carbon
Carbon
Proton polymer
Carbon
Carbon
T. Cacciagerra, CRMD Orléans
5 µbar 5 µbar
50 µbar 50 µbar
<∅Pt> = 2,5 nm , σ(∅Pt) = 1 nm 10 nm
10 nm 10 nm
<∅Pt> = 7 nm , σ(∅Pt) = 4 nm Porous Pt deposit
Dense and smooth Pt deposit
Catalyst Sputtering on (into) GDLPt deposition morphology, TEM
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
0 500 1000 1500 20000
2000
4000
6000
8000
Energie (keV)
Counts
Experience
Simulation
PtProgram principle :
(1) Build a virtual target(mathematical Pt profil)whose RBS spectrum isclosest to theexperimental spectrum
(2) Minimize error betweenexperimental andsimulated RBS spectrum
Ei = f(MPt,z)
T. Sauvage, CERI, Orléans
GDL + Pt(MPt)
Eo He(α)
Experimental principle
C
0 1000 2000 30000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Depth (nm)
Pt (µg/cm?/nm)
Pt:stretched exp
C :Heveaside
F :Heveaside
Pt Concentration gradient :solution of porous media
equation
Catalyst Sputtering on (into) GDLPt depth density, RBS
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Asymmetric Pt peak Pt deposition into
the GDL
0 200 4000
0.2
0.4
0.6
Depth (nm)
Pt (µg/cm
2/nm)
5 µbar 10 µbar20 µbar
T. Sauvage, CERI, Orléans
Catalyst Sputtering on GDLPt depth density, RBS
0 100 2000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Depth (nm)
Pt (µg/cm
2/nm)
Pt = 7 µg/cm_Pt = 14 µg/cm_Pt = 33 µg/cm_Pt = 66 µg/cm_Pt = 109 µg/cm_Pt = 138 µg/cm_Pt = 159 µg/cm_
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
5
6
7
Platinum diffusion into porous GDLduring deposition process :
1 – When the deposition pressure decreases,diffusion depth of platinum atoms in GDLincreases.
2 – When the deposition pressure increases, aporous platinum layer forms on the GDL surface.
3 – When the platinum load increases, diffusioninto the GDL is limited deposition on thesurface of a low active area layer
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Maximum diffusion length is around200 nm
Proton polymerCatalyst
Catalyst200 nm
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Densité de courant (mA/cm_)
Pote
ntiel (V
)
E-Tek (0,35 mgPt/cm_)MEA2MEA3MEA4MEA8
Carbon paper05MEA8
Carbon cloth05MEA4
Carbon cloth-405MEA3
Carbon cloth020MEA2
CathodicBacking
GDLbias(V)
Pressure(µbar)Parameters
C. COUTANCEAU, LACCO, Poitiers
Catalyst Sputtering on cathode GDLElectrochemical efficiency for oxygen reduction
Fuel cell I-V characteristics (70°C, 4 bars, chemical anode)
Results on H2 fuel cell tests:1 - Better proton conductivity at high depositionpressure due to the porous catalyst layer (SEMand TEM)2 Better active surface area at low depositionpressure due to smaller catalyst nano-particles(SEM and TEM)3 Voltage drop at high current density due tocatalyst absence in the GDL : catalyst diffusionlength is around 200 nm (FC electrode model)
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Platinum and carbon nanostructuresmust be mixed / deposited together
in around a 1 µm thickness.
Proton polymerCatalyst + Carbon
Catalyst + carbon 200 nm 1 µm
Carbon
Carbon
Requirements : High surface area, chemical and thermal stability and high electronic conductivity
Gas diffusion layerCarbon nanostructures deposition on carbon paper
Carbon graphitic (amorphous) nanostructures
CNT/CNF ((PECVD)Nano-horns (laser ablation)
Nanosheets (PECVD)Nanocoils (PECVD)
Nano-particles(Dusty plasma)
Nano-particles (carbonsputtering in Tokamak )
a-C layer (plasma sputtering)
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Gas diffusion layerCNT / CNF
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Methods of synthesis :- laser vaporization,- arc discharge,- catalytic-CVD,- catalytic-PECVD
High quality CNT/CNF in large quantity, uncontrolled spatialarrangement, high temperature.
High quality CNT/CNF in quite small quantity, controlled spatialarrangement in particular with a C – PECVD, quite lowtemperature.
Helicon - PECVD for CNT/CNF growing :- Ni catalyst clusters : Ar sputtering- CNT/CNF : CH4 / (N2 or Ar) PECVD- Pt nano-particules : Ar sputtering
π13.56 MHz
PumpGas input(CH4 / Ar )
Target(Ni)
Target(Pt)
Heating and bias hold – substrate(200 < T < 400 °C, - 300 V < V < 0 V)
Carbonpaper
ArgonH2 +
Styrene HC-CH2
Triflic acid(CF3-SO3H)
+ H2
40 kHz ~50 W
+
Pump
Precursor
+++
+ +
Circular gasinput
+ +
3.10-4 mol/cm²/sMethanol permeability
0,2 10-2 σ/mProton Membrane Conductivity
~ 250 nm/minDeposition rate
~ 50 WPower
- 10 VSubstrate bias
0,5 mbarTotal pressure
~ 0,1 mbarH2 / Triflic acid partialpressure
~ 0,025 mbarH2 / Styrene partial pressure
Membrane deposition by PECVDS. ROUALDES, IEM, Montpellier, France
(IEM, Montpellier, France)
Requirements :- High proton conductivity,- Chemical and thermal stability,- Low methanol / gas permeability,- Low cost and long Life
Reference membrane Nafion (DuPont) :- Perfluorated membrane with fix acid groups SO3-
- Conductivity = 0.2 S/m ( T, hydration )- T > 90°C : water evaporation conductivity
decreases
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Membrane deposition by PECVD
Plasma membraneMembrane Nafion® 117
100 µm
2 µm
⇒ Plasma membrane is dense
3 10-4
2 10-3
MeOH Flux(mol.m-2.s-1)
Up to 120°0,6Plasma membrane (1µm)
Up to 90°0,5Nafion® 117
Thermal StabilityResistivity (mΩ)
Plasma membranes are adapted for micro fuel cell andhave a good chemical and thermal stability.
S. ROUALDES, IEM, Montpellier, France
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer
Fuel cell Membrane depositionCatalyst Sputtering Gas diffusion layer