Planning Field TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM … SITK CONTROL DIVISION Remedial Planning Field Investigation...

$: Planning Field TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM … SITK CONTROL DIVISION Remedial Planning Field Investigation Team (REM FIT) ZONE II CON I R AC I \(). 0 l-()()*)2 CHj.\ \HHILL Lc:olo^y& Environment$
HAZARDOUSSITK CONTROL

DIVISION

RemedialPlanning

FieldInvestigation

Team(REM FIT)

ZONE II

CON I R AC I \().0 l - ( ) ( ) * ) 2

CHj.\ \HHILLLc:olo^y&

Environment

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMPHASE II WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

VERONA WELL FIELDBATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN

May 17, 1985

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMPHASE II WATER QUALITY SAWM.ING


May 17, 1985

0003071

May 17, 1985 TC-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

INTRODUCTION 1

A. Purpose and Scope 1

B. Phase I Investigation Errata 2

C. General 2

METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 3

A. General Procedures 3

B. Special Sampling Methods 6

C. Decontamination Procedures 6

D. Tracer Test 7

E. Chain of Custody 9

F, Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review 9

RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 10

A. Groundwater Flow 10

B. General Water Quality Results 11

C. Off-Site Volatile Organic Results 15

1. Southern Plume 16

2. Eastern Plume 20

D. Thomas Solvent's Volatile Organic Results 22

1. Thomas Solvent's Annex 22

2. Thomas Solvent's Raymond Road Facility 25

SUMMARY 29

CLOSING REMARKS 29

REFERENCES 30

0003075

flay 17, 1985 -1-

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMPHASE II WATER QUALITY SAMPLING


INTRODUCTION

A. Purpose and Scope

This technical memorandum describes the methods and results of the Remedial

Investigation, Phase II Water Quality Sampling at the Verona Well Field,

Battle Creek, Michigan. This report Includes the work efforts described in

Subtask 6-8 of the July 3, 1984 Work Plan Revision, Remedial Investigation/

Feasibility Study and In part satisfies the technical memorandum described

in Subtask 6-10. The technical memorandum titled "Phase II Drilling and

Sampling, Verona Well Field, Battle Creek, Michigan" describes the well

installation, development procedures and other work efforts described in

Task 6. The purpose of the water quality sampling was to obtain a second

round of samples from selected wells sampled in the Phase I investigation

and to sample recently Installed wells in areas which required further

characterization of the horizontal and vertical extent of contaminated

groundwater. The sampling program encompassed water sampling within the

well field, at two Thomas Solvent facilities, within the Grand Trunk Western

Railroad's (GTWRR) Marshaling Yard, and other monitoring wells and private

wel ls within the study area.

The discussion of the results of this Investigation relies In part on the

general discussion of the hydrogeology as described In the technical memorandum

titled "Phase II Drilling and Sampling, Verona Well Field, Battle Creek,

0003076

May 17, 1985 TC-2

Page No,LIST OF TABLES ———

Table 1 - Phase II Sampling Sequence 4

Table 2 - General Water Quality Parameters 13

Table 3 - Results of Sampling While Drilling at Well W-2I 22

Table 4 - Selected Volatile Organics - Thomas Solvent's 24Annex

Table 5 - Results of Sampling While Drilling at Well B-8I 25

Table 6 - Chlorinated Ethenes and Ethanes - ThomasSolvent's Raymond Road Facility 28

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 - Study Area

Figure 2 - l,2-D1ch1oroethene Isoconcentration Map - August, 1984

Figure 3 - Tetrachloroethene Isoconcentration Map - August, 1984

Figure 4 - Total Chlorinated Volatlles Isoconcentration Map - August, 1984

Figure 5 - Cross Section G-G1 1,2-D1chloroethene - August, 1984

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A - Summary of Water Quality Analyses - Volatile Organics

Appendix B - Summary of General Water Quality AnalysesAppendix C - Summary of Water Quality Analyses - Tracer Test

Appendix D - Summary of Water Quality Analyses - Volatile OrganicsSamples Obtained While Drilling

Appendix E - QA Technical Memorandum

Appendix F - Product Specification Sheet - DOWCLENE«

Appendix G - Revised Drawings - Technical Memorandum, Phase IDrilling and Soil Sampling

Appendix H - Revised Drawings - Technical Memorandum, Phase IWater Quality Sampling

0003077

May 17, 1985 -2-

Mlchigan". A brief update of the groundwater flow direction using the most

recent water table maps is provided for clarity. The water table maps are

presented in the Phase II Drilling and Sampling Technical Memorandum.

3. Phase I Investigation Errata

Two Technical Memorandums were issued presenting the results of the Phase I

investigation, Phase I Drilling and Soil Sampling, and Phase I Water Quality

Sampling. Several cross sections were presented 1n these reports which had

minor errors In scale. Appendix G contains a new set of drawings for the

Technical Memorandum Phase I Drilling and Soil Sampling and Appendix H contains

a new set of drawings for the Technical Memorandum Phase I Water Quality

Sampling. Results of the investigation or discussion presented in the text

of these Technical Memorandums are basically unaffected.

C. General

The water quality sampling took place between August 7 and August 15, 1984.The sampling methods followed the plans outlined In the August 3, 1984 updated

sampling plan. Water samples were collected from wells as shown in Table 1(see Figure 1 for well locations). A summary of the volatile organic results

is 1n Appendix A and a summary of the general water quality results are

included in Appendix B. Appendix D contains analytical results of water

samples collected during drilling. The results of these samples provide

additional data as to the vertical distribution of the contaminants. The

methods used to collect these samples is contained in the Phase II Drilling

and Soil Sampling Technical Memorandum.

0003073

May 17, 19&5 -3-

The selected private wells, located In the subdivision north of Emmett Street

and west of the GTWRR Marshaling Yard, included three wells that had previously

shown high concentrations of contaminants identified in the well field and

two private wells located west of the private wells previously shown to be

slightly affected.

All laboratory results, quality control information and chain of custody

records are included 1n a separate document titled Support Documentation,Phase II Investigation, Remedial Investigation, Verona Well Field, BattleCreek, Michigan. The Information In that document is summarized 1n this

Technical Memorandum and 1s not essential for review of this TechnicalMemorandum.

METHODS OF INVESTIGATION

A. General Procedures

The depth to groundwater was measured using a clean, fiberglass measuring

tape with a sounding device. Water levels were recorded to within -0.02

feet. Groundwater depth measurements were referenced to the top of thesurveyed well pipe. All tools and devices were decontaminated before

entering the well as discussed below.

0003079

May 17, 1985 -4-

TABLE 1

PHASE IIWELL SAMPLING SEQUENCE

Sampling Crew: 1 Sampling Crew: 2

Date

3-7-84

3-8-84

8-9-84

8-10-84

8-13-84

8-14-84

8-15-84

SampleNumber

W-7ST-9

E-7W-13SW-14ST-6W-10I

W-12DB-23T-58-24B-25

6-88-8 1B-9B-19B-20

8-22B-21B-14

B-17B-17IB-18IB-18A8-18

5 PrivateWells(H1-H5)

PurgingMethod

Pitcher PumpPitcher Pump

Stainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerPitcher Pump

Pitcher PumpStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless Bailer

Stainless BailerPitcher PumpStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless Bailer

Stainless BailerStainless BailerStainless Bailer

Stainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless Bailer

Pump Installed1n well (Jet Pump)

Date

8-8-84

8-9-84

8-10-84

8-13-84

8-14-84

SampleNumber

T-7W-11DT-16B-lT-lW-5S

W-1SW-1IW-3SU-2SW-2IT-ll

T-10W-4SW-4IW-40

W-6SW-6IW-6DE-8w-asW-8IW-80

W-9SW-16SW-16IE-14

PurgingMethod

Pitcher PumpPitcher PumpPitcher PumpPitcher PumpPitcher PumpStainless Bailer

Pitcher PumpStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerPitcher PumpPitcher Pump

Pitcher PumpPitcher PumpPitcher PumpPitcher Pump

Stainless BailerPitcher PumpPitcher PumpStainless BailerStainless BailerPitcher PumpPitcher Pump

Stainless BailerStainless BailerStainless BailerStainless Bailer

[blc-65-12]

0003050

May 17, 1935 -5-

The total well depth was measured with the weighted tape, then the volume

of water 1n the well was calculated. Generally, 4 to 7 well volumes were

purged from each well before obtaining a sample. Wells 1n relatively lower

permeable areas (8-1, W-3S, W-14S) had 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 well volumes purged

before obtaining a sample. Two methods of purging were used:

1. Pitcher pump with, or without, galvanized steel riser pipe;

2. Hand balling using either a top loading or bottom loading stainlesssteel bailer. (See Table 1 for specific methods employed at eachwell.)

A hand-operated pitcher pump was used where groundwater was at a shallow

depth, the well could produce water quickly, and personal protection could beaccommodated. At some wells, the pitcher pump could be threaded on to the

top of the well. At others, decontaminated 1 1/4-Inch diameter galvanizedsteel pipe was threaded together and Inserted Into the well with the pitcher

pump attached. A small volume (about 1 liter) of twice distilled bottledwater was used to prime the pitcher pump. Purge water was discharged Into a

40-gallon wastewater receptacle for measuring the purged volume. The purge

water was transferred to a 300-gal Ion holding tank for disposal Into the

sanitary sewer. At the end of purging, the pitcher pump and galvanized

steel pipe were removed and placed 1n a clean area for later decontamination.

The well was then hand balled using a decontaminated stainless steel bailer

to remove the volume of water placed under suction 11ft by pitcher pumping

(about 3 gallons). Finally, the well was sampled using the same bailer.

0003081

May 17, 1985 -fa-

Hand bailing was used for collection of all groundwater samples and as a means

of purging where other methods were not practical. Two types of bailers were

used for purging and sampling: stainless steel bottom loading and stainless

steel top loading. The bailer was attached to a stainless steel cable for

raising and lowering. The stainless steel cable was pulled up onto clean

polyethylene sheeting. Care was taken during bailing to minimize aeration

of the groundwater sample.

B. Special Sampling Methods

At Well 8-18 a sample of an immiscible floating oily layer was obtained before

purging. This sample was collected using a top-loading stainless steel

bailer. The top of the bailer was lowered just below the fluid level, 1n

order to collect a sample of the oily layer. This sample is labeled as 8-18A

in Appendix A. The well was then purged and sampled as with any other well,

and labeled 8-18.

C. Decontamination Procedures

Before mobilizing to Battle Creek, all galvanized receptacles used for

washing and all galvanized steel pipe used with the pitcher pump were steam

cleaned. Each sampling crew was equipped with two clean decontamination

receptacles. One contained a tr1-sod1um phosphate (TSP) solution, the

other contained twice distilled bottled water. All water used for on-sita

decontamination came from twice distilled, glass bottled commercially

available water. All equipment and tools (measuring tapes, purge pipe,

bailers, stainless steel cable, retrieval tools, etc.) were washed in the

TSP solution utilizing stiff bristled brushes and/or clean disposable rags

attached to cleaning rods. The equipment was then doused 1n the clean water

0003082

May 17, 1985 -7-

receptacle and placed on clean polyethylene sheeting. Immediately prior to

introduction to the well, equipment was given a final rinse with clean water

directly from glass bottles. All wash water, rinse water, and purge water

was held in 300-gallon tanks for disposal at the end of the day. This water

was disposed into a sanitary sewer at the corner of Brlgden Drive and Darlene

Street.

D. Tracer Test

A tracer test was conducted between Municipal Wells v-31, and V-27 and v-28with the intent to aid in determination of the aquifer dlsperslvity between

these wells. A sodium bromide tracer was injected Into Mundpal Uell V-31

on August 11, 1984, then Municipal Wells V-27 and V-28 were monitored for

the breakthrough of bromide through time. Sampling 1s still being conducted.

A water truck, previously used for clean drilling water, was filled from

a hydrant outside of the Verona Well Field pumphouse. A 1-Hter sample was

collected from the tank to prepare a standard of 1.29 grams of sodium bromide

mixed with 1000 mllliliters of water. The specific conductivity of the

standard was measured as 1839 umhos at 25° C. A predetermined mass (11.4

pounds) of MalHnckodt analytical grade sodium bromide was slowly poured

into 1000 gallons of water while the water was being mixed with a centrifugalpump. The sodium bromide solution was mixed until specific conductlvy

measurements were observed to be within 10 percent of the standard. Results

of analysis of the tank samples showed the concentrations of the injected

water was 1002 mg/1 and 1028 mg/1 for Tanks 1 and 2, respectively.

0003033

May 17, 1985 -8-

The sodium bromide solution was then pumped into Municipal Well V-31 by way

of an Injection hose coupled to the 3/4-inch diameter airline hole in the

well head. The 1000-gallon solution was pumped at a rate of approximately

20 gallons per minute.

Before mixing a second tank load, the tank was rinsed with hydrant water to

flush out any residual sodium bromide solution. A second tank load was mixed

as before and Injected Into Well V-31. A total of 2000 gallons with an average

concentration of 1015 ppm sodium bromide salt was injected into Well v-31.

Concurrent with Injection into Well V-31, background sampling was performed

at Municipal Wells V-27 and V-28. The line of purge wells (V-20, Y-22, V-25,

V-27 and V-28) were pumped continuously throughout the duration of the test.

Municipal well sampling Is still being conducted (March, 1985) (see Appendix c

for results of this sampling).

Review of the data indicates that the bromide was not detected at the down-

gradient municipal wells. This could be due to any one or combination of

the following reasons:

• The dilution of the bromide *as larger than expected;

• Variations In background were too high to detect the bromide plumeat the downgradient municipal wells; or

• The plume migrated to other municipal wells, due to unknown localheterogeneities within the aquifer

The latter reason 1s not supported by the groundwater flow direction shown

by the August and November, 1984 water table maps.

0003084

May 17, 1985 -9-

E. Chain of Custody

All samples were subject to rigorous chain of custody procedures In the field.

In general, the procedures followed CHgM Hi l l 's Chain of Custody Procedures.

The specific details are as follows;

1. All sample bottles were labeled at the well using stick-on labels.Information provided on the label included the sample number, dateand time collected, and the samplers initials;

2. The sampler maintained custody of the sample by keeping it inhis/her possession or In a locked vehicle in an iced cooler;

3. The samples were returned to the field station (the Verona UellField Pumping Station) frequently, and there relinquished to thepreparation area technician (PAT). The PAT accepted sample custody;

4. Sample preparation Included the paperwork, affixing labels tosample jars, and packing them into coolers with vermiculite andice;

5. Samples were shipped on the same day they were collected to theappropriate laboratory via Federal Express for overnight delivery.

Documentation of the chain of custody 1s contained In the document titled

"Support Documentation, Phase II Investigation, Verona Well Field, Battle

Creek, Michigan".

F. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review

The EPA's Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Review is contained in

the document titled "Support Documentation, Phase II Investigation". A

memorandum summarizing the data's quality control and how the data can be

used is contained in Appendix E. In general, the QA/QC for the volatile

organlcs analyses indicates the volatile compounds identified and reported

concentrations can be reliably used quantitatively.

0003085

May 17, 1985 -10-

RESULT5 OF INVESTIGATION

A. Grounowater Flow

The hydrogeology, including the direction of groundwater flow in the

vicinity of the Verona Well Field, is discussed in detail in previous

Technical Memorandums. However, a brief summary of the groundwater flow

system 1s necessary within this report to properly interpret the water

quality data.

Water level data were collected on August 11 and November 1, 1984. The

corresponding water table maps are presented on Figures and 5 and 6,

respectively, of the Phase II Drilling and Sampling Technical Memorandum.

The August water table map Indicates two cones of depression centered on

Municipal Wells B-14 through B-16, and on Wells V-20, V-22, V-25, V-27,

V-28, V-39 and V-40. These wells were being pumped during the period water

levels were obtained. No data was available in the vicinity of MunicipalWells V-51, V-52 and V-53 which were also pumping at this time. Locally,

the cones of depression cause groundwater flow within the aquifer to be

toward the pumping municipal wells.

The November water table map Indicates two cones of depression located southof the river and centered on Wells V-20, V-22, V-25, V-27, V-28, V-39 and

Wells V-51 and V-52. No cone of depression is shown by the selected contour

interval west of the river because of the low drawdown associated with low

pumpage rates in.that area (Well V-14 was the only pumping well).

000308G

May 17, 1985 -11-

The Thomas Solvent Annex facility is located above a broad groundwater divide.

The divide separates flow north, to the well field, and flow northwest toward

the Battle Creek River. Groundwater 1n the vicinity of the Thomas Solvent 's

Raymond Road facility Is primarily toward the northwest to the well field.

The GTWRR Marshaling Yard Is located on the southeastern flank of the well

field cone of depression. Flow is generally toward the northwest in the

direction of the well field.

3. General Water Quality Results

Groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds ( V Q C ' s ) at

all sampled wells and all the following general water quality parameters

were analyzed on samples from the selected wells, as shown below:

Parameters Wells

pH T-lspecific conductivity T-9total alkalinity E-7chloride B-lni tri te-n1trogen B-17nitrate-nitrogen B-17Iammonia-nitrogen B-18total KJeldahl-nitrogen B-18Isulfate W-6Isulflde W-6Stotal organic carbon (TOO W-16I

Appendix B contains a summary of the general water quality parameters and

Appendix A contains a summary of the volatile organic analyses. The following

discussion covers the general water quality parameters.

Specific conductance and pH were analyzed shortly after sample collection, in

the field laboratory, at most existing and Phase II monitoring wells to:

000308

May 17, 1985 -12-

a) Determine if there are Impacts on water quality due to wellconstruction (for example, grout invasion which may result inhigh pH and high conductivity); and

b) Obtain an indication of general water chemistry in the area.

The pH of water samples ranged from 6.65 (Well W-16S) to 7.65 (Well W-8S).

Conductivity values ranged from 240 umhos/cm at Well W-8S to 2880 umhos/cm

at Well W-3S. Most samples had a conductivity of 1000 umhos/cm or less

(excluding W-3S, W-13S, W-16S, B-18 and B-21). This range of pH and

conductivity 1s within the normal range for this aquifer and does not

indicate a problem with grout Invasion. The source of the high conductivity

at Well W-3S Is unknown. The source of elevated conductivity at the other

locations 1s discussed below.

The results of pH, the nitrogen series, sulfate, sulflde and alkalinity are

within normal range for these parameters in sand and gravel and sandstone

aquifers. In addition, these parameters do not present a recognizable trend

within the area.

Conductivity, chloride and TOC present recognizable trends within the area.

In the vicnlty of Thomas Solvent's Raymond Road facility, Wells B-17, B-18

and W-16S indicate levels of all three parameters substantially over the

average of the remaining samples as shown 1n Table 2.

0003083

May 17, 1985 -13-

TABLE 2

GENERAL WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS

Conducti vi ty Chlorlde TOG(umhos) (mg/1) (mg/1)

B-17 910 92 6.4

B-18 1160 122 324

W-16S 1360 193 650

T-9 865 77 2.4

E-7 755 52 3.9

Mean of all samples 742 33 2.8Excluding B-17, B-18 and W-16S

Standard Deviation (unbiased) 360 24 1.3Excluding 8-17, B-18, W-16S

Upgradlent of the facility, Wells E-7 and T-9 have substantially lower

concentrations of conductivity, chloride and TOC Indicating the Raymond Road

facility Is the probable source of these elevated parameters. The elevated

TOC Is correlated directly with the volatile organic contaminants.

Between Wel ls B-18 (on the Raymond Road site) and W-16S (a short distance

downgradlent), there Is a decrease In chlorine associated with volatile

organlcs (62 mg/1), and an Increase In chloride concentration (71 mg/1).

This is reasonably good agreement, and may be fortuitous, but taken together

with other data, there Is good reason to believe that the Increased chloride

concentrations may be a result of the degradation of chlorinated organlcs by

reductive dehalogenatlon (e.g., removal of cl from trichloroethene to form a

0003089

May 17, 1985 -14-

cHchloroethene). Conductivity has a similar trend to chloride and appears

to be directly related to the source of chloride. Chlorinated compounds

which were handled on the site include tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane,

trichloroethene and methylene chloride. Substantial decreases in concentration

for these substances (except methylene chloride) were observed between We l l s

B-18 and W-16S. (See the detailed description of the observed organic

compounds contained in subsequent sections.) Substantial increases in

probable degradation products, Including dlchloroethanes, dichloroethenes,

and vinyl chloride, were observed between these same two locations.

Degradation of organlcs by microorganisms is reported to take place in anoxic

or anaerobic environments, when there Is another more readily biodegradable

carbon source available. Some of the observed water quality data are consistent

with biological activity and development of anoxic conditions. Under these

conditions, one would expect lower concentrations of oxidized species of

nitrogen and sulfur. Between Wells 8-18 and W-16S, reductions 1n nitrate,

nitrite, and sulfate were observed. One would also expect a carbon source

attributable to non-halogenated organlcs. Among the volatiles, there are

several aromatics (benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene) and ketones

(acetone, 2-butanone, 4-methy1-2-pentanone), present at B-18, which all show

lower concentrations at W-16S. In addition, there Is organic carbon, not

associated with the volatHes, at both locations. Analysis of the TOC data

shows an increase In TOC between Wells B-18 and W-16S, from 324 mg/1 to 650

rng/1. At these same locations, the organic carbon associated with the

volatiles was calculated to be 148 mg/1 and 60 mg/1, respectively, using

molecular formula stolchlometry and the data in Appendix A. The volatile

organlcs data therefore shows a decrease In total organic carbon between

0003090

May 17, 1985 -15-

Wells B-18 and W-16S, attributable 1n large part to the decrease in non-

halogenated volatile* (aromatlcs and ketones). At both locations there

appears to be a substantial carbon source in addition to the VOC's, to support

mlcrobial growth.

C. Off-Site Volatile Organic Results

The results of the volatile organic analyses indicate distinct contaminant

plumes within and upgradlent of the well field. The discussion In this

section describes the condition of the plumes in terms of the general source

areas and distribution downgradlent of the sources. Specific contaminant

distribution on the two Thomas Solvent facilities is discussed in the section

"Thomas Solvent Volatile Organic Water Quality Results".

The volatile organic analyses used to develop this groundwater quality

discussion Include:

a) Sampling performed at monitoring wells and selected private watersupply wells during August, 1984; and

b) Results from sampling of Municipal Wells by Michigan Department ofPublic Health (MDPH).

c) Results from groundwater sampling performed concurrent withwell drilling;

Isoconcentratlon maps of 1,2-DCC (Figure 2) tetrachloroethene (Figure 3} and

total chlorinated volatile* (Figure 4) were developed from samples collected

during August, 1984. The contours of these maps are based on the highest

concentration observed at each well nest or inferred to be 1n the aquifer.

The values for municipal wells represent samples collected at approximately

the same time as the monitoring well samples or represent a range from samples

collected before and after the monitoring well samples.

0003091

May 17, 1985 -16-

The results of the August, 1984 sampling confirm the general contaminant

distributions as shown by the Phase I {February, 1984} Investigation. AS

discussed In the Technical Memorandum, Phase I Water Quality Sampling, two

contaminant plumes are present, a southern plume and an eastern plume. These

two plumes were distinguished based on contaminant types and distribution.

Briefly, the southern plume originates south of the well field, extends

throughout the central and western portion of the well field and is dominated

by the compound 1,2-DCE. As pointed out in Phase I, the two Thomas Solvent

facilities are sources of the southern plume. The eastern plume was identified

in the eastern portion of the well field and 1s dominated by tetrachloroethene

and 1,1,1-trlchloroethane. The Phase I Technical Memorandum did not identify

a specific source of the eastern plume.

1. Southern Plume

The southern plume, as characterized by 1,2-DCE, 1s similar in areal extent

to the plume described in the Technical Memorandum, Phase I Water Quality

Sampling.

The contaminant distribution beneath the two Thomas Solvent facilities 1sdescribed in more detail 1n the section, "Thomas Solvent Facilities Ground-

water Quality". The following discussion of the southern plume focuses on

two areas where the Phase II data fills In areas where the Phase I data was

inconclusive.

0003092

May 17, 1985 -17-

As stated 1n the Phase I Water Quality Technical Memorandum, the water

quality between Well U-5S and Well Nest W-8 was inferred because Well W-5S

1s a shallow well and previous private well sampling in the area indicated

contamination. Phase II investigation sampled five functional private

wells within the residential area. No drilling logs were available for

these wells, however, they are assumed to be deeper than Monitoring Well

W-5S (40 feet deep). The 1,2-DCE concentration at Private Wel ls H-l (9.40

ug/1), H-2 (680 tig/1) and H-4 (570 ug/1) were relatively high compared to

Well W-5S (below detection) Indicating the plume is probably at a greater

depth than the 40-foot deep shallow monitoring well in the area. Therefore,

on Figure 2 the 10 ug/1 contour line extends beyond Well W-5S to account for

the plume which appears to be at a greater depth.

The Phase I data was also Insufficient to characterize the southern plume

between Well W-9S and Well Nest T-6/W-10I. Wells W-16S and W-16I were located

based on the soil gas sampling In this area and the flow system described

in Phase I. 1,2-DCE was not detected at Wells W-9S, T-6 and W-10I for both

the Phase I and Phase II samplings. However, Well W-16S has a 1,2-DCE

concentration of 40,000 ug/1. Figure 2 Indicates a high concentration

1,2-DCE plume leaving the Thomas Solvent's Raymond Road site and migrating

past W-16S, 1n « narrow width between Well W-9S and Well Nest T-6/W-10I.

The l,2-OCE'plw» exhibited a change from the Phase I sampling time (Feburary,

1984) to the Phase II period (August, 1984) in the area north of the purge

wells (Wells V-20, V-22, V-25, V-27 and V-28). After startup of the purge

wells, concentrations decreased north of the purge line. This change is

manifest when comparing the Phase II, 1,2-DCE isoconcentratlon map (Figure 2)

0003093

May 17, 1965 -18-

wlth the 1,2-OCE map from Phase I (see Figure 2 of the Phase I Water Quality

Sampling Technical Memorandum). The detection limit contour line has been

pulled back to the line of purge wells (Wel ls V-20, V-22, V-25, V-27 and

V-28) from Its position extending to the north end of the well field in

February, 1984 (Phase I). However, south of the purge line, the 100 ug/1

concentration contour line is In approximately the same location in both

Phase I and Phase II maps. Therefore, the purge system appears to be blocking

contaminant migration from the southern plume north of the purge well line,

while overall concentrations of 1,2-DCE south of the purge line are not

substantially different as shown In the monitoring wells.

The distribution of other volatile organic parameters 1n the southern plume

generally shows a similar but less extensive distribution than 1,2-DCE. These

parameters Include tetrachloroethene (Figure 3), trlchloroethene, and to a

lesser extent, I,l-d1chloroethane, 1,1,1-trlchloroethane, and l,2-d1chloroethane

The tetrachloroethene plume (Figure 3) 1s presented to Illustrate the similar,

but less extensive plume distribution, as well as to distinguish the southern

plume from the eastern plume.

An Isoconcentratlon map of total chlorinated volatlles (Figure 4) Is also

Included to present a composite view of the southern plume's components. The

southern plume, however, does overlay the eastern plume, as shown by this map

in the vicinity between Wells V-32 and V-25.

0003094

May 17, 1985 -19-

Flgure 5, Cross Section G-G', presents the concentration contours for 1,2-DCE

1n cross section. The section Is drawn from Well T-9 upgradlent of the Thomas

Solvent Raymond Road Facility, approximately through the centerllne of the

1,2-DCE plume. The section generally follows a flow line from the facility

Into the well field and Is oriented to provide a clear representation of the

vertical distribution of 1,2-DCE between the Thomas Solvent's Raymond Road

facility and the well field.

Inspection of Figure 5 Indicates that the deeper Piezometer B-18I, showed a

1,2-OCE level below detection while the shallow water table well (well B-18)

showed a level of 4200 ug/1 1n the composite sample. This indicates that

the vertical extent of the 1,2-DCE plume 1s limited to less than 33 feet

below the water table surface In the vicinity of the Thomas Solvent Raymond

Road facility, consistent with the water quality collected during drilling

Well B-18I (see Appendix D for results). This sampling shows that the 1,2-DCE

concentration dropped from 14,000 ug/1 at a depth of 23.5 feet to below

detection at a depth of 48-53 feet.

A similar situation occurs downgradient of the Raymond Road facility at Well

Nest W-16S/W-16I. Piezometer W-16I Indicates a 1,2-OCE level below detection

while the shallow water table well (Well W-16S) indicates a 1,2-DCE level of

40,000 ug/1. Sampling perforned while drilling Well W-16I also indicated

1,2-OCE was below detection at the 39 to 52 foot depth sample. However, the

tetrachloroethene 1s shown to extend Into the bedrock aquifer at this location

(540 ug/1 at 39-52 feet and 280 ug/1 at 52-60 feet). This well nest Is

important in determining both the vertical and horizontal extent of the

plume downgradient of the Raymond Road facility.

0003095

nay 17, 1985 -20-

Cross Section G-G (Figure 5) indicates that the deeper portions of the bedrock

aquifer are uncontamlnated directly below the Raymond Road facility, however,

downgradlent of the facility the plume deepens progressively so that at Well

Mest W-4, the center!ine of the plume is at least 45 to 50 feet beneath the

water table. Nearby Municipal Well V-35 1s similarly a- -:ted.

The 1,2-DCE, tetracnloroethene and total chlorinated volatile plumes are

inferred in the vicinity of Well Nest T-1/W-12D. As shown on Cross Section

G-G' (Figure 7), the wells are placed at the top and near the base of the

aquifer. As shown at Well Nests W-6 and W-4, on the same section, the center

line of the plume is 1n the middle of the aquifer. Therefore, the plume on

the isoconcentration maps (Figures 4, 5 and 6) and Cross Section G-G' (Figure

7), is shown to extend through this area.

2. Eastern Plume

Figure 3, the August, 1984 tetrachloroethene Isoconcentration map indicates

two separate plumes, an eastern and southern plume. The eastern tetrachloro-

ethene plume, as shown by this data, 1s centered 1n the eastern portion of

the well field and extends upgradient to Wells W-13S and W-14S. Results of

the August, 1984 sampling confirms results of the Phase I Investigation

which indicated that the eastern plume 1s characterized by tetrachloroethene,

1,1,1-trlchToroethane, I,l-d1chloroethane and I,l-d1chloroethene, 1n that

order of predominance. The eastern plume does not have trichloroethene,

1,2dlchloroethene, or l,2-d1chloroethane 1n significant concentrations.

000309G

May 17, 1985 -21-

The locations of W e l l s W-13S and W-14S were based on the soil gas investigation,

observations at the site and through information obtained from discussions

with GTWRR employees. Well W-14S is located adjacent to the highest soil gas

reading, and in the vicinity where GTWRR employees indicated waste liquids

had been disposed of. Wel l W-13S is located outside the "paint roon" of the

GTWRR Car Department Building.

Based on discussions with GTWRR employees, DOWCLENE* was used for at least 12

years in the area and stored in the Car Department Building's "paint room".

Its use was discontinued approximately 2 years ago (discussions held on July 19,

1984 with GTWRR employees by investigation team leader). DQWCLENE* consists

of 75* 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 25% tetrachloroethene (a product specification

sheet is included in Appendix F).

It appears the GTWRR Car Department Building Area is the source of the eastern

plume, based on:

1. The distribution of tetrachloroethene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane;

2. The use and probable disposal of these materials (DOWCLENE®) inthe area of Wells W-13S and W-14S;

3. The presence of these compounds in the soils above the water table(see Phase II, Drilling and Sampling Technical Memorandum); and

4. The apparent absence or low concentrations of these compoundsupgradlent of the GTWRR Car Department Building (at Well T-7).

Based on concentrations of tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and

1,1-dichloroethane, it appears that the centerllne of the plume downgradient

of the GTWRR Car Department Building progressively deepens so that at Well Nest

W-2 it is at a depth of approximately 40 feet below the water table surface.

0003097

May 17, 1985 -22-

Analyses at shal low well W-2S did not detect these three parameters while

deeper Piezometer W-2I indicated significant concentrations (tetrachloroethene

81 ug/1, 1,1,1-trichloroethene 41 ug/1 and 1,l-d1chloroethene 41 ug/1). It

appears that the shallow sand deposit is relatively unaffected near Wel l

Nest W-2, while the deeper sandstone aquifer is impacted. Although the

vertical extent of the plume has not been defined at Well Nest W-2, results

of sampling performed while drilling (Table 3 and Appendix D) indicate lower

levels of V O C ' s at depth.

TABLE 3

RESULTS OF SAMPLING WHILE DRILLING AT WELL W-2I

Parameter/Sample Depth 46'-59' 57'-70' 73'-80'

Tetrachloroethene 110* 120 191,1,l-tr1ch1oroethene 210 68 101,1-dichloroethene 26 64 61,1-dlchloroethene 19 17 3Other VolatHes 10 8 _2

Total Volatiles 375 277 40

* All values in ug/1

0. Thomas Solvent Volatile Organic Water Quality Results

1. Thomas Solvent's Annex

The water quality at the Annex 1s characterized by a high concentration

of V O C ' s at Wells B-8, B-9, B-24 and B-25. Compounds with the highest

concentration at these wells are summarized 1n Table 4.

0003093

May 17, 1985 -23-

The highest concentration of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene (TCE) is

found at Wells 3-24 and B-25 on the southern portion of the Annex. The

highest concentration is close to the southern end of the dock (previously a

waste liquid-drum storage area). Table 4 also shows a sum of the total

chlorinated ethenes and ethanes. The table indicates concentrations of the

chlorinated ethenes is approximately the same between Wells B-24 and 6-3.

This indicates the contaminants may have migrated from B-24 to 6-8, following

the flow system, but the solvents tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene have

probably partially degraded to dlchloroethene. Downgradient of Well 6-8,

at Wells 3-9 and T-5, the concentration of chlorinated ethenes is somewhat

less. This could be because the center of the plume may be below the

bottom of these monitoring wells (T-5 depth-39 feet, B-9 depth-24 feet).

This would be similar to the plume configuration downgradlent of the Thomas

Solvent Raymond Road site shown on Cross Section G-G (Figure 7). The

chlorinated ethanes do not show a similar continuity in concentration.

Upgradient Wells 3-1, W-11D and T-16 Indicated very low levels of volatile

organlcs (see Table 4 and Appendix A).

Deeper Piezometer 8-81 (54 feet deep) Indicated a very low level of VOC's,

in contrast to shallow Well B-8 (24 feet deep). Likewise, sampling while

drilling indicated a reduction 1n tetrachloroethene, trlchloroethene and1,2-OCE with depth as shown on Table 5.

0003099

TABLE 4

SELECTED VOLATILE ORGANICSTHOMAS SOLVENT'S ANNEX

(ug/1)

Parameter/Well

Tetrachloroethene

Trichloroethene

Oichloroethenes(1,1 and 1,2)

Total ChlorinatedEthenes

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

Dichloroethanes(1,1 and 1,2)

Total ChlorinatedEthanes

Ethyl Benzene

Toluene

Xylene

B-l

9

3

BDL (5)

12

BDL(5)

BDL(5)

BDL

BDL(5)

BDL(5)

BDL(5)

B-8

6,600

1,000

11,000

18 ,600

BOL (100)

150

150

1,900

750

4,900

B-9

1,700

660

4,500

6,860

BDL(IOO)

BDL (100)

BDL

BDL (100)

380

BDL(IOO)

B-24

5,300

9,000

4,040

18,300

2,300

110

2,410

50

2,700

760

B-25

4,000

6,300

1,300

11,600

530

750

1,280

1,500

3,900

4,800

T-5

40

40

5,000

5,080

BDL (50)

90

90

BDL (50)

BDL (50)

BDL (50)

T-16

2

27

BDL(S)

29

BDL(5)

Bl)L(5)

BDL

BUL(5)

BDL(5)

BDL(5)

W-11D

BDL(5)

Bl)L(5)

BDL(5)

BDL

BDL(5)

BDL(5)

BDL

BDL(5)

bDL(5)

BDL(5)

UDOOin

INJ-P-I

Otooo

BDL(IOO) - Below Detection Limit with Detection Limit shown in Parentheses

[blc-l

"ay 17, 1985 -25-

TABLE 5

RESULTS OF SAMPLING WHILE DRILLING AT WELL B-8I

_Sample Depth Selow Ground

Parameter 25'-40' 42 ' -50 ' 52 ' -60 ' 62 ' -70 '

Tetrachloroethene* 2,096 66 13 BDLTrichloroethene 270 12 4 BDL1,2-Dichloroethene 196 9 4 BDLTotal Chlorinated Ethenes 2,562 87 21 BDL

* All parameters in ug/1

BLD - Below Detection Limit of 1 ug/1

It appears that the affected groundwater 1s limited mainly to within 37-49

feet below the water table surface at this location (50 to 62 feet below

ground surface).

2. Thomas Solvent's Raymond Road Facility

As shown on the Total Chlorinated Volatile map (Figure 6), the Raymond Road

facility is a major source of contamination to the southern plume. The

contaminants on this site Include the same chlorinated ethenes and ethanes

(see Table 6) and the non-chlorinated solvents acetone, toluene and xylene

as at the Annex. The Raymond Road site also contains methylene chloride,

2-butanone (methyl-ethyl-ketone) and 4 methyl-2-pentanone (isopropylacetone

or methyl isobutylketone), not present at the Annex. Thomas Solvent handled,

by name, all tne compounds present in the groundwater at the facility except

the dichloroethenes, dichloroethanes, chloroform and 4 methyl-2-pentanone.

Benzene and ethyl benzene are both components of diesel fuel and are commonly

found as constituents of (e.g. VMP Naptha), or as impurities in the other

0003101

May 17, 1985 -26-

solvents handled on the property. The dichloroethenes and dichloroethanes

have been shown in recent studies to be degradation products of the higher

chlorinated compounds. (Cline and Viste, 1984, Parsons, et al. 1984).

iThe occurrence of organic compound degradation is supported by the following

observations:

1. The presence of "parent" compounds such as the products used on-site(tetrachloroethene, trlchloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane) on theproperty and the virtual absence of the degradation products on thesite (dichloroethenes, vinyl chloride, and dichloroethanes);

2. The presence of the degradation products off site, downgradient ofthe facility; and

3. The presence of degradation by-product chlorine, 1n the presence ofchlorides, In approximately the mass predicted by the degradation ofparent compounds to daughter compounds (See discussion in 6. GeneralWater Quality Results).

The highest concentration on the property has been Identified at Well B-18,

both in the oil phase (NAPL - Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid) and water phase.

The NAPL layer contains high concentrations of compounds found in wells at

the facility with the addition of benzene and ethylbenzene. The analytical

results from sampling the NAPL are designated as B-18A and are contained in

Appendix A. The NAPL at Well B-18 was of similar thickness and concentration

as observed In the Phase I Investigation. Since the Phase I investigation,

Thomas Solvent's consultant has been monitoring wells in the vicinity and

removing the oil phase when it builds up in Well B-18. Records of thismonitoring and removal have been sent to EPA.

0003102

May 17, 1985 -27-

The vertical distribution of contaminants on the Raymond Road site at Wel ls

B-18 and B-18I 1s discussed along with the southern plume 1n the Off-Site

Volatile Organic Analysis Results section of this report. The results at

Wells B-17 and B-17I are similar.

The horizontal distribution of each of the contaminants on the property

has generally been described through discussion of Cross Section G-G' .

The highest concentration occurs at Well B-18, and lower concentrations

upgradient at Wells 6-14 and 8-21. Wells B-22, and W-16S. installed in

Phase II, confirm the inferrence In Phase I, that a major plume 1s leaving

to the northwest, between Well W-9S and Well Nest T-6/W-10I. Results of the

Soil Gas Investigation, described In the Technical Memorandum Phase II

Drilling and Soil Sampling, indicates a portion of the tetrachloroethene

plume may be migrating undetected in the groundwater through the area of

Well T-6. Because Well T-6 1s open at a depth of 30 to 39 feet, approximately

15 feet below the water table, this appears unlikely, but possible. However,

the total volatlles soil gas results are generally consistent with the

groundwater quality results, in that the major plume is migrating northwest

of the facility.

0003103

TABLE 6

Parameter/Wen

Tetrachloroethene

Trichloroethene

Dlchloroethene(1,1 and 1,2)

Total ChlorinatedEthenes

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

Dlchloroethane(1,1 and 1,2)

Total ChlorinatedEthanes

CHLORINATED ETHEMES AND ETHANESTHOMAS SOLVENT'S RAYMOND ROAD FACILITY

(ug/1)

B-14

1,300

BDL (50)

BDL(50)

1,300

BDL (50)

BDL(50)

B-17

75,000

710

BDL(500)

75,710

570

BDL (500)

B-171

BDL(l)

BDL(l)

BOL(l)

BDL

BDL( l )

BDL(l )

B-18

25,000

53,000

6,200

84,200

37 ,000

5,400

B-181

93

11

BDL(l)

104

BDL(l)

BOL(l)

B-18 A(Oil)

35X106

35xl06

BDLC(IxlO6)

70xl06

20X106

BDL(IxlO6)

B-19

210

190

6

416

220

B D L ( l )

B-20

510

400

15

925

350

BDL(5)

B-21

32,000

1,400

11,000

44,400

10,000

BDL (500)

B-22

170

110

65

345

270

8

BDL 570 BDL 42,400 BDL 20xl06 220 350 10,000 278

ooin

1IV)001

BDL - Below Detection Limit with Detection Limit Shown In Parentheses

ooCO

[blc-65-12]

May 17, 1985 -29-

SUMMARY

Based on this discussion of the Phase II Water Quality Sampling Results, the

following points can be made:

1. Results of this Investigation has further defined the extent of thesouthern and eastern contamination plumes.

2. The southern plume Is limited to within approximately 20 to 25 feetbelow the water table surface In the vicinity of the Thomas SolventRaymond Road facility and Annex. The plume deepens progressivelydowngradlent of these two facilities.

3. The eastern plume appears to originate near Wel ls W-13S and W-14S1n the vicinity of the car department building on the GTWRR MarshalingYard property. This plume also appears to be concentrated atthe water table at the source area and to deepen downgradlent.

CLOSING REMARKS

This Technical Memorandum has summarized the Phase II Water Quality Sampling

investigation conducted In August, 1984. Results of this Investigation will

be integrated Into the total site analysis in the Remedial Investigation Report.

Respectfully submitted,

UARZYN,ENGINEERING INC.

Kenneth J. Qufnn, CPGSProject Manager

AJS/KJQ/cac/DRVCblc-65-12]

0003105

May 17, 1985 -30-

REFERENCES

CHne, P.V.; and V1ste, D.R. 1984. Migration and Degradation Patterns ofVolatile Organic Compunds. In 5th National Conference on Managementof Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, HMCRI, November 1984.

Parsons, F., Wood, P.R., and OeMarco, J. Transformation of Tetrachloroetheneand Trlchloroethene 1n Microcosms and Groundwater, JAWWA, February1984, P. 56-59.

000310G

ICOCNO

-= ••— MltD KMB

=.--";=; HTMU V*0

————• IUI1

WILBIM

UILIMO

FENCC

MMOMI1

c^>WO WMJIMIHC tfu

NWICIMi Wll

NOTE*

MIWTE MIL LOUUtM

iU( NV MtMMB >T CHlOKO MERIM SUtttf fMM IIISliKMM M* All fMIO IfCNHMl IMt).

[UMIIM ««» OF « MO I lltKI Kill HOMHCI l¥ CHICMO MIM IMrtI IKMMWI 10M «• MOtflMOI).LOUIIOM OF * uiiu mis Mill m uiuiwi wr MOVIMB•t M cm 01 Mini OKU.I.E. Ml ( 1MKS Hill. MB MU* H MB Ml IOU!IO» MMU MU.S.fi.I. MUUHMIt MtUU MK MB "Mil* FiIOM.

SCALE200i 1600

800 2000

M/ARZYN

FIGURE 1STUDY AREAREMEDIAL INVESTIGA!1UNVERONA WELL FIELDBATTLE CREEK, MIGUbAHDRAWING NO. Cll lBb-ti lu

000310

r

*»-' MOM IN KMK Or JIM >.). Of • 10.KH "•/'

ODJWO MCM lIFttMO. <-l«CI«HS HLOM HlttTIQH)

> Mill lOWIIOH MO MMU H1IN COEWMIIOI !• .«/!

«IF(JI 10 FIBM I (OHHMC W. C111M -lit) f•ttli DM LKM.CUCUIMIIM OMIOMU «KIN MWKEI HUMMUS! « KM*

»l«€i! CWCMIMIKH

M ML MHIKWIM Kill W F«M *Hill* MMttl r , 1M4 TO WGHH IS . IM4.>*IH M •-!• ii ret cavosin iMvit.•ligtS AT »-!(«] (1 UtLll Mi KIMIS FKH TIC rUIODJULT 11 • MQKI ».1M4.«-S£llEi Will MMKIl It N.O.F.M. MO UUN. Mi OTHtKoi WSIM canMcr

t>SCALE

I6OO

800 200O

WARZYN

FIGURE 21.2 DICHLOftOCTHENEISOCONCENTRATION HAPAUGUST.1964REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONVERONA WELL FIELDBATTLE CHEEK, MICHIGANDRAWING NO. C11185-826

0003103

t

j-JU

kCOCNO

liOOMCUIMIION COnOW (COIKM 1NIERM1 Li—10—" ym. IN KM is of iu •.«. W* • 10.000 »t/i

DAIHIB IMtt IMIMCB, <-IMIUKl KLOM HIU11MI

*2i> WU iOUII« «<• «•«• «"" »tt«Mlt» M .»/'*»

KF(I 10 FIUM I 1MUMIM, M. ClllK-Ut) 10* JWUIMIf I MO UCOB.

llSCALE

1600

800 2000

WARZYN

FIGURE 3TETRACHLOROETHENtISOCONCENTRATION HAPREHEDIAL INVEST IUU luNVEROMA HELL FILIDBATTLE CREEK, M lCn i t .ANDRAWING NO. CMlti'j ii./

0003109

liOOKIBTMIIH CMIOM |OMHU IMKIMl 11TIB •-«. It* • I0.0M ••"

UHMtt. <.|MIU!UHllWafl[tIIOi

LOUTIOI MB MMU HUH OW(«UU(M !• -ft/:

•**

1111)

-"N

1111Li

#•

ss''(/ \l>f

u*.

1. MFEI 10 HCM 1 (MUWUK tt.iMill MB UtfM.

SCALE200 1600

800 aooo

WARZYN

FIGURE 4TOTAL CHLORINATEDISOCONCENTRATION HAPAUGUST.1984REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONVERONA HUL FIELDBATTLE CREEK, MICHIGANDRAWING NO. C11185-B32

tie HO.otic w«i uciioH ut UREMI. » MIWE MO u>«H rtMKM 10 M W EUC1 KnuUHHOl Of SU1UVKC

OETKU HUMS.1. MSTIM NMK$ MDCtH ««0tl( Win 1NBIUTEI WE MHKT

II MttMEI.}. *I (MM GMMUNMfl MNITMM UELl 01 ttVOCIC OM1NG IK

lOCATUM M OQHUt l« II MtUMIElt lOCAHl HITH MSMCI1» NMIIOI1M. IKJIIIOi MB (UIICM BETTM Of tfdOCIC Win.DC ««M!C Win NM KM OUEMllItl. KMIIEB KtCOir-T1«M Mi MIKKTU W M MM IOB II M KOWMfHCnn Mwsciin.

*. *U CHUKIC WIT CCHIICn MD DC MIEI IMU UWKt MEMOW to M cum or iw MM iac. M.I MIIWIM tisiMcnMf WtUOC* HIM KIKtl » M CUTE! Of E*U MIW tM.

*. MU KPTM M» ICMIOtO 01 OHN inEklKLI Mt MOW ffl*ItLWItallN fWMKt. MfEOUCE KN*T WHMICES fOk HEllCOniOKIMi KHIlt tm OWING IOSS rot KCUT H * ISEMItl KLII Km OOtlOBI. WHICINL «Ll IOB •!»!*» f««TIC CIK «F MHU COfU.

«. GMWOMKO «*UJ ( -2- ) Bf TEMMB (KM UMtt IC«EL•uoMfjon Munu M MGWI n.im.

i. MM ueu union ME (IMCMMIEB «taiic«.i 10 n«s

LCOEMD

—1OO— cona»i«*i

HORIZONTAL |QO SCALE800

LEGEND VERTICAL 10

400

SCALE

1000

40

TVPCAL weu. oeiAi,

D ma IM M •••! !•••)•(.VBI »^ " ^^——1 - -

II ••*• •* • MB MU MM UUttW* mm W11M UM1HHB.

80

100

WARZYN

FIGURE 6SECTION G-G'1,2 DICHLOROETHENEAUGUST.19B4REHEDIAL INVESTIGAIIUNVERONA U£LL FIELDBATTLE CfttEK, MICHIGANDRAWING NO. Clllbb-BJJ

APPENDIX A

SUMHARY OF WATER QUALITY ANALYSES VOLATILE ORGANICS

WAMBVN

0003112

PHASE IIHftTEfc QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVERONA WELL FIELDCASE 3070

VOLATILE OfcGANICS fll BlOUP

BB BBI B14 B17 B17I BIB B16DUP

AcroleinAcrylonitrilcBenzen*Carbon Tetrachlori.deChlorobenzen*1 . 2-Dichlorootbanel,l,l-Trlchloro«thaniI . l-Dichtor<Mtb*n*1.1,2-Trlchlorcwthan*1.1.2, 2-Tetrachloco«thaneChlorocchan*2-Chloro»thjrlvinyl EtherChloroform1 . 1-Dichlorootbcnc1 ,2-Dicbloro«tb«n«1 ,2-DichloropropancTrans-1 . 3-Oichloroprop«n«Cia . 1 , 3-Dictaoroprop«n*Ctbylb«nxancHetbyl«n* ChlorideChloroaethancBr omomc t ha.n«firovofor*

FluorotricblorovethaneCh lor odibroaoM thaneTetracblorocthen*TolueneTrichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideAcetone2*butanoneCarbondiaulf ide2 -Hexanone4-Methyl-2-PentanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesTotal VolatilesTotal Chlorinated Volatile*

2420

150

150

11,000

1,900200

6,600750

1.000

1.600

4.90028,25016,950

570

2.300 2,BOO

5,400 6,80037,000 43,000

4,500

160

1,700380660

290

1.300

6904,800

75.0001.400

710

5,600

11

2.0004.200

3.40012,000

55.00015,000

4.700

2.5004,600

4,10013,000

25,000 22.00055.000 59.00U53,000 67,000

62,00016,000

4,900

7.4007,020

1,5901,590 Bl.OBO

15,000 IS.OOu11 289,000 322,70011 138,600 153,900

ooO

PHASE nHATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVEfeONA «3.L FIELDCASE 3070

VOLATILE ORCAMICS B18A B1BI BIS B20 B20 fi21 B22 B23 B24 B25(U9/1I OOP

AcrolelnAcrylonltrllefianzen* 1,400,000 1,000 92 90 20Carbon T*teachlorideChlorobcnsan*1.2-Dichloro«than* 21.1,1-TricblortMtban* 20,000.000 220 350 470 10,000 270 12 2,300 5301,1-Dtchloroathan* 4 B 120 110 7501.1,2-Trichloroethane1.1,2,2-T*tracblor<Mthan«Chloroethan*2-Cblorocthylvlnyl EtherChlorofom 9 10 720 4 21.1-Dichloro«tb*n* 13 2B 40 301.2-Dichloro«tbcn« e 15 21 11,000 . 52 820 4.000 1,3001,2-OichlOropropan«Tran»-1.3-Dichlorof>ropeneCi», 1,3-DicblorOf>rop*MEthylhcnzenc 6.400,000 « 1.600 So 1,500Hethylcm Chlorjda 2.700,000 13 13 18 4,200 37Chlorovethan*firomomttbaneBrcwofor*fir oaod i chlor ovethanePluorotrichloroncthane 20 20ChlorodibroBOMcthaneTetracbloroeth*nc 35,000,000 93 210 510 fibO 32,000 170 390 5,300 4,000Toluene 46.000.000 7 17,000 1 53 2.700 3,900Trichloroethene 35,000,000 11 190 400 400 14,000 110 720 9.000 6,300Vinyl ChlorideAcetone 27 6,000 902-butanoneCarbondisulfide2-Hexanone ^94-Hethyl-2-Pencanone ?StyreneVinyl AcetateTotal Xylenes 24,000.000 13 5>,buo 130 7bO 4,800Total VoUtlles 170,500,000 172 626 1,297 1,769 103,120 t>65 2.405 2 4 , 3 7 0 23,240Total Chlorinated Volatiles 92.700,000 121 626 1,297 1.769 71.920 bb4 2.094 20,770 12,930

oooCO

oooOJ

PHASE IIHATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVERONA HELL FIELDCASE 3070

VOLATILE ORGAN I CS Mil HIS H2I M2S H3S M4S H4I H4l H4D H5S U6Slug/It DUP

AcroleinAcrylonitriltBenx*ncCarbon TetrachlorideCblorobenzvn*1 . 2-Dicbloroctban*1,1,1-TricblorovthAiw 3 4 1 1 7 7 1 6l,l-Dichloro*tban* 41 14 141 . 1 , 2-Tricblorcttthani1.1.2. 2-T*tracbloro*thaneChl or o« than* 15 132 -Chl or «t by 1 vinyl EtherCbloroforB1 . 1-Dicbloroetfacnc 6 11.2-Oicbloroctbmc 210 220 51 .2-Dicbloroprof>*n*Truni- 1 . 3-DichloropropeneCi» , 1 , 3-OicbloropropcncEthylbenzcncM*tbyl«n* Cblorid* 1 24 11 IB 30Chl or o»e t h>nc

bromotonBr o»od i chl or o»et baneFluorotrichloroMethane 2 2 2 3 3 2Ch 1 or od i br omomf t haneTetrachloroecbcne 4 61 2 1 12 11 jTolueneTrichloroettiene S 2 9 1 9 1 i t > uVinyl Chloride 140 130 7Acetone 6 5 1 42-butanone 10Carbondi sulf ide2-Hexanone4 -Methyl - 2-pcntanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesTotal Volatilea S 17 173 10 12 2 514 497 30 2 .',JTotal Chlorinated Volatile* 9 7 173 4 7 2 514 497 30 2 - tt>

PHASE IIHATEft QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVEkOMA HELL FIELDCASE 3070

VOLATILE ORGANICS H6I M6D H7S H6S HBI M80 H9S H9S N10I W11D H12Dlug/11 DUP

AcrolcinAcrylonitrlleB*nz*n« l 530 5bOCartoon TetrachlorideChlorob*nz*n«1 , 2-Dicbloroccbane 3 5l.l.l-Trichloro*tbane 2 3 41 , 1-Dicblorotthan* 12 4 1 . BOO 1 , BOO1.1, 2-Tri cbloroctfaan*1.1.2. 2-TctracbloroetbaneCbloroccbanc2-Cbloroctbylvinyl EtherChl or of or*1 .1-Oicfalorocthene 31.2-Dichloro*th«n« 130 91 67 51,2-DichloropropaneTrans-1 .3-Oichloroprop«neCii , 1 . 3-Dichloroprofwn*EthjLbcnzenettetbylenc Chloride 21 32 51 16 13 960 960Chl or OM than*

Broaof or»Br ovod i chl or o»e t banePluorotnchloroqethane 4 2ChlorodibroKOBe thaneTetrachloroethene 52 3 22 22 2 , 300 1 , 200Toluene 4 , 300 4 . 300Trichloroethene 1/0 6B 24Vinyl Chloride 25 2 610 530Acetone 12 12 6 5,600 5,1002-Butanone I ,100CarbondiauHide2-Hexanone4 -Het hy 1 - 2 -Fentanone 560 680StyreneVinyl AcetateTotal Xylenes 330Total Volatiles 431 44 13 235 144 13 17.010 16.230 2Total Chlorinated Volatiles 416 32 7 235 144 13 5,670 4,490 2

oo

oooCO

PHASE IIHATES QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVERONA WELL FIELDCASE 3070

OftGAMICS H13S H14S U14S H16S H16I Tl TS T6 T7 TS T10tug/ It OOP

AcroUiaAerylonitril*

«M 1 . 900 SOorotxnxtiM

1 , 2-Dlchloro» thane 11 . 0001 .1 .i-TrichlorocthaiM 1 .350 1 .050 1 ,300 4 .800 2 101 , 1-DichlorMthan* 40 1 ,630 2. 100 5 90 31.1, 2-Tr ichloro*tJ>*n* 401.1.2. 2-T«tr«cbloro«thaneChloroethane 14 202-Cbloroetbylvinyl EtherChlorofor*1.1-Dichlorocthcra 41 60 501 . 2-Dlchlorocthuie 10 6 40 , 000 IB 5 , 000 B1 ,2-DichloropropaneTrans-1 , 3-DicbloropropeneCi». 1 ,3-Dichloroprop«n«

H«tbyl«nc Cblorld* 16.000 S3CblorOMtbui*brovovethanc

broauii4chl oro»e LhtneFluorotricbloro«ethane 2 2 3 0 2 1 0 0 4 3Ch 1 or od i broKcmet h*neTetrachloroetttcne 3,070 10.500 9.700 3.200 170 40 3Toluene 26.000Trichloroechene 190 160 46 40 5 7Vinyl Chloride 2 2,300Acetone 26,000 92 72-butanoneCar bond i sulf ide2-hex*non*4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 3.200StyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesTotal Volatile^ 4 .513 13.456 13,360 136,400 223 73 5 .452 0 4 29 l^Total Chlorinated Voiatiles 4,513 13,456 13,360 77,300 223 73 5,310 0 4 22 19

PHASE IIHATE* QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVERONA tCLL FIELD

3070 ORGAMICS T16 £7 Efl £14

AcrolM*AcrylenltrlU

HI H2 H3 H4 H570 PICKFORD 46 HAXftELL 72 PICKFORD 135 BRIGDCN QUAD L

Cartoon TetracfalorideChlorobenMM1 .2-Dlchloroa thane1 , 1 . 1 -Tricolor oethaoe1 . 1 -Oicbl or MtlutiM1.1. 2-Trlehloro«tbu»1,1.2. 2-TtttrAchloro«thuMChlorocthuw2-Chloro*tbylvliirl EtharChloroform1 ,1-DicbloroctlMM1.2-Dicbloro*tlMM1 . 2-DichloropropWMTrana-l . 3-DichloropropwwCi» , 1 . 3-CUchl.oropropwie

ttethylam Chlorid*ChlorcNHtbMW

10

40 13

SS43

980 12

36

27

680

ISO

hfomoiormfir oaod i chl orOPluorotricblorcNMtbancCblorodibroMMtbvttTetracbloroethMMTolueneTr i chl or octhciwVinyl Chlorid*Acetone2-ButanoneCftrbondi »ulf id*2-Hexanone4-Hechyl-2-Pcnt«noneStyreneVinyl AceteteTotal XylenecTotal VolatileaTotal Chlorinated Volatile*

27 370

632

260

107

3232

46846B

33876

290160320

300240

2.4641.784

12

570

120

4B2661

170130

2424

905905

1.125799

IBI B

ooCO

PHASE IIWATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTSVEfcOMA tCLL FIELD

nnriNrrn TANK i TANK 2 010 on FIELD BLANKS ——012 014 015

MrylcnftriJeItntMMCarbon Tvtracblorid*

1 ,2-DicblorMthaM1,1. 1-Tricfcloroetttao*1 . 1-DichlarMtbftM1 , 1 ,2-Trlchloro>tlMm1.1,2, 2-T*tr«chloro*tb*neChloroctbanc2-ChlorcMtbylTinrl EtterCblorofor*1 .l-Dichlorocthww1 ,2-DicblorovttwM1 , 2-DlchloropropwwTrans-1 . 3-Olchloropropane

Ethflb«nx«ncHethyltn* Cblorid*Chl oroMtban*

24

Broaofor*fir o«od i cb J oroM CbancFluorotrichloroMthancCh 1 or odlbroMwc thaneTetracbloroethuwTolueneTrichloroctbcn*Vinyl Chlorid*Acetone2-EtutanoneCarbond i a u if ide .2-Hexanonc4-MethyJ-2-PentanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenexTotal Volatile*Total Chlorinated Volatilea

23

19

17

15 1213

4424

4223

13B

316

1919

ooo00

APPENDIX B

SUMMARY OF GENERAL HATER QUALITY ANALYSES

WAftZVftl

0003120

WARZYPJ

ENGINEERING INC

_ ,*nm run

DATE SAMPLED: 8/7/84

Sample No.W7ST7T9E7


W10IT6MUDTl 6-808W5S81TlW13S-808145-808


W2IW2S824

825W1IW3S

B23T5

W12D

W1STil

APJAUYTICAU UABORATORY "NRESUUTS n ^ r o 5 p r p w p H . g /7 - 1 5 /34

» -M Verona Well Field ' Project NO: C 1 1185 . jbheet I i of 3 1

,___ Battle Creek, Michigan ^fL- -App d~ |

-TL ttr-i, -«- —— -^

FIELD ANALYSIS SUMMARY "NConductivity !

pH I? 258C Alkalinity(S.U.) (umhos/cm) (mg/1)6.90 5006.90 4906.90 870 . 3956.95 755 372

7.05 5357.20 6007.35 5057.30 8157.30 7557.35 510 2397.30 630 2447.00 11607.30 820

7.20 7607.40 5007.00 7607.05 5657.20 5056.95 28806.90 8757.10 8907.25 4957.20 7557.05 760

0003121

ANALYTICAL LABORATORYWARZYIM

ENGINEERING INC

i^HQ EMtL. 3T»B«T • P O. «OX «3». MADISON, WI3. 3J / . 3 "• •- •

RESULTS -a.a ?*r*, ,^.-'"~'~ "'Verona Well Field Pro je<- f Nn- C 1 1 1 3 5

Proiect ——— —————————— ————— ———— 5heet 2/ of 3

————— Battle Creek. Michigan —————— Cr"^d. ^'^L^^Bi1^" —————————— - — •• Date issued. _ ____ ___

«Tmm,T . P 0 BOX «3«. MAD.SON, w.a. 33713 • TSL. («O«I 337-18-8 ————————————————— */

DATE SAMPLED: 8/10/84 Conductivityu 3MMrLl- pH 0 25°C Alkal inity

Samole No. (S .U. ) (umhos/cm) (mg/1)T10W4D

W4SW4IB-8

B-8I8-9B-19

B-20

7.20 5907.20 4957.45 3607.30 3457.00 3007.35 6006.90 9757.15 6407.25 735

DATE SAMPLED: 8/13/84W6DW6IW6SB14B21B22E-8W8DW8Iwas

7.00 5507.30 540 2567.40 4607.10 7557.05 10707.25 6857.45 8557.00 5057 . 20 9057.65 240

DATE SAMPLED: 8/14/84W9SE14W16IW16SB17B17I818

B18I

7.05 8857.00 5707.20 755 3146.65 1360 324

7.10 910 364

7.15 555 2527.00 1160 3997.40 575 264

___ • —— —— •

0003122

WARZYN

ENGINEERING INC

ANALYTICAL. LABORATORYRESUUTS

Verona Well Field

Uocatton Battle Creek, Michigan

O d t e aprpi vo i - 3 / 7 - 1 5 / 3 4Project No: C 11185Sheet 3 ^f 3

Apo'Date Issued:

14O9 CMIL STHKET O. BOX 993%. MAOI9ON. wia. 33719 • TCL. (AOt) 337


Sample No.HIH2H3H4H5

PH(S.U.)7.107.207.207.257.10

Conductivity(3 25°C(umhos/cm)8958659907101240

Alkalinity(mq/1)

0003123

\^

WARZYIM^^^^ ^^^_^^^^^^^^^^

^^^^r ^^^^r

ENGINEERING INC

Sample pHNo. (S.U.)

Tl

T9

E7

Bl

Bl

7.30

6.90

6.95

7.35

dup. 7.35

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY RESULTS

Projec t

1 nrat_ ion

- 14O» EMIL

Conductivity£ 25°C

(umhos/cm)

630

865

755

510

510

Verona

Battle

Alkalinity

244

395

372

237

240

Uell hie Id

Creek, Michigan

Chloride

-

77

52

5

8

53715 - TEL.

NitriteNitrogen

-

<0.005

<0.005

0.015

<0.005

NitrateNitrogen

-

<0.10

<0.10

0.95

0.98

Date Received- .Project No: CSheet 1 ofCkd Cfo>Date Issued: _4,

AmmoniaNitrogen

-

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

8/7,8/84

JUS5- — — -__j! __ jrr^j

\pp'd Vvt/*/.-i J___..._

TotalKjeldahlNitrogen

-

0.16

0.17

0.42

0.65

Results are in mg/1 unless otherwise stated.

Oc>OCJ

WARZYIM

ENGINEERING INC

^

SampleNo.

Tl

T9

E7

Bl

Bl dup.

Sulfate

•

63

8

50

48

AIMALYT

Project

Location

^^14O» EMIU STREET

Sulfide

-

0.20

0.60

<0.10

<0.10

ICAL. UAHtJHATDHY Ht=SUL_T5 8/7,8/84Date Received-

- --Verona Well Field Proiect Nn- C 11185Sheet 2 of _ . . . _ _ 2 _ ^Ckd .VIM App'd ffjc^'

Battle Creek. Michigan Oate issued: -l'^L/£^--

• P.O. BOX 0338. MADISON. WIS. 53713 • TEL. (6OB) 257-4846 —— •••• ••- ' ' —————— ———— ——————— — — .• *•

Total OrganicCarbon

-

2.4

3.9

2.5

3.0


cr

WARZYIM

ENGINEERING INC

SamplNo.

B17

B17I

818

81 81

W6I

W16S

W16I

ANALYTICAL

Project _ ._ .....

Location .. . ....—— — 14O9 EMIU STREET - P.O. BC

GENERALConductivity

e pH ? 25°C(S.U.) (umhos/cm) Alkalinity

7.10 910

7.15 555

7.00 1160

7.40 575

7.30 540

6.65 1360

7.20 755

364

252

399

264

256

324

314

LABORATORY 1

Verona Well Field

Battle Creek, Michigan

>X »93B. MADISON, WIS. 93715 •

WATER QUALITY SUMMARY

NitriteChloride Nitrogen

92 0.032

23 0.006

122 0.028

24 0.017

25 <0.005

193 0.014

48 0.018

RESULTSDate Received" - - . - - ._ _ L_... .Project No: _C 111»5Sheet 1 of.. ._„__£Ckd tyii) App'd^ffiz?Date Issued: -;/.v/vs '

TEL. (6O8) 257-4046- —— ————————————————————————————————

TotalNitrate Ammonia KjeldahlNitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen

0.28 0.13 0.24

<0.10 <0.10 0.18

0.30 0.24 0.78

0.13 <0.10 0.11

<0.10 <0.10 0.10

0.16 0.32 0.86

0.16 <0.10 0.16


WARZYIM

ENGINEERING INC

ANALYTICAL

Project _ Verona Well Field

RESULTS

Location Battle Creek, Michigan

EMIU STREET • P.O. BOX OS3S. MADISO*4, WIS. 53715 • TEL, (6OB) 257-4848'

B/13/84Date Received- .Project No: C 11185_Sheet ? of 2Ckd .C&i,*Date Issued: _*£

Sample No. Sulfate SulfideTotal Organic

Carbon

B17

B171

B18

B18I

W6I

W16S

W16I

44

43

52

44

39

9

42

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0 1

<0.1

6.4

1.1

324

4.2

<1.0

650

<1.0


APPENDIX C

SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY ANALYSES TRACER TEST

WAffZVN

0003125

DISPERSIVITY TEST kEiULTSVERONA WELL FIELD

DATES

OOoCO^*f^^4

f\3CD

ll-Aua-8413-Aug-8415-AUQ-6416-Aug-B4l7-Aua-8420-Aug-8422-Aug-8424-Aug-8427-Aug-8429-Aua-8431-Auq-8404-Sep-8405-Sep-B407-Sep-8410-Sep-8412-Sep-8414-Sep-B417-Sep-B419-Sep-8421-Sep-8424-Sep-8426-Sep-8428-Sep-84Ol-Oct-8403-Oct-8405-Oct-B4Oe-Oct-8410-Oct-8412-OCC-84lS-Oct-8417-Oct-8419-Oct-8422-Oct-8424-Oct-6426-Oct-8413-Nov-84lS-Nov-8403-Dec-8405-Dec-8407-Dec-B410-Dec-fl412-Dec-8414-Dec-8417 -Dec -8419-Dec-8421-Dec-842b-Dec-8428 Dec-8431 -Dec -8404-Jan-85U7 Jdn-85

64.6184.6284.6234.6384.6384.6484.6484.6584.6684.6684.6784.6884.6884.6984.7084.7034.7184.7184.7284.73B4.73B4.7484.7484.7584.7684.7684.7784.7884. 7B84.7984.8084.8084.8184.8284.8284.8784.8884.9384.9384.9484.9484.9584.9684.9684.9784.9784 .9984.9985.0085.0185.02

PLANT TAP

0.53

0.42

0.71

0.5

0.6

WELLSV 2 7

0.550.160.890.710.590.440.460.430.490.550.480.560.640.510.430.530.580.570.670.680.570.590.670.520.650.720.460.570.610.470.570.650.640.640.490.350.480.4

0.350.440.450.410.560.48i*. 550.620 . 4 70.450.460.520.55

V260.520.320.610.630.520.3

0.280.310.390.410.360.5

0.520.570.40.50.5

0.580.680.760.450.6

0.650.620.730.740.480.540.490.520.530.5

0.550.580.5

0.580.620.490.490.5

0.470.40.3

0.580.590.710.580.420 .460.450 .49

U22 V25 V39

0.25

V40

0.64

V41

0.6

V42

0.58

V43

0.69

0.380.3

0.520.49

DISPERSWITY TKST RESULTSVERONA WELL FIELD

DATES09-Jan-6511-Jan-aS

PLANT TAP85.03B5.03

WELLSV27 V280.52 0.530.52 0.55

V22 V25 V39 V40 V41 V42 V43

NOTES;1. ALL RESULTS IN MG/L21 AVERAGE INJECTION CONCENTRATION 1015 MG/L3. INJECTION VOLUME 2000 GALLONS4. ANALYSIS BY CH2M HILL

Ooo

to

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY ANALYSES - VOLATILE ORGANICSSAMPLES OBTAINED WHILE DRILLING

WAMZYN

0003131

WATER QUALITY SAMPLINGDUffING DRILLINGPHASE II DRILLINGVERONA HELL FIELDCASE 2938

VOLATILE OKCANICS<UC/L>

BAILER B6I fiBI BBI BBI B17IBLANK 25-40' 42-50' 52-60' 62-70' 51-59'(B9-726)

B17I B17I B1BI62-70' 62-70' 23.5'

filfil B16I23.5-26.5' 29-34'

ooo

COio

AcrolelnAcrylonitrileBenzeneCarbon Tetr*chlori<leChl or obenzene1.2-Dichloroe thane1 . 1 . 1-Trichloroethane1 . 1-Dichloroethan*1.1, 2-Trichloroetbane1.1.2. 2-TetrachloroetnaneChloroe thane2-Chloroethylvinyl EtherChl or of or*1 . 1-Dichloroethene1.2-Oichloroethene1 ,2-DichloropropaneTram- 1,3-Di color opropeneCi».l,3-DlchloropropeneEthylhenzeneHethylene ChlorideChloroMethaneBrOKOBC thane

broaodichloroaethanePI uor ot r i chl or ome thaneChlorodibroBoaethaneTetrachloroetheneTolueneTrichloroecheneVinyl ChlorideAcetone2-butanoneCar bondi suit" ide2-Hexanone< -Hethy J - 2-FentanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XyienesTotal VolatilesTotal Chlorinated VolatilesOTHEft COMPOUNDS (NO-TOTAL UG/L)

136

196

1269

2096

270

12

4000

1600068000

1500400014000

660043000

66

12

13

4

39B939B9

9999

2626

790009bOOO130000

JOOOOO32000

26000

300002 6720002 377500& 1-7000

L" HtlXANE 7000 UG/I,UU1- - KIUJi DUPLICATENUii - NOT DETECTED BECAUSE OF Ul.ANK CONTAMINATION

1500 1100

300022000 16000

780

1500

7200

190003000037000

2600012000

1000016696067460

560650

1500

690

13000210002900U

Ibuuu

WATEfc QUALITY SAMPLINGUUhJNG DfclLLJNUPHASE I] DRILLINGVEhONA HEI.l. FIELDCASE 2938

VOLATILE OKGAJUCSiUC/L)

HI HI34-39-

U1BI38-43'

fllBI43-48'

biei48-53'

Mil75-78'

Mil7B-BB-

Mil88-98- Mil

BB-98DUP

Mil100-110

H2146-59' 57-70

oooCJ(—*COCO

AcrolcinAcrylonitril«BenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobcnzcne1,2-Oichloroethuie1,1. 1-Trichloroethane1 ,1-Dichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroeth*ne1.1,2, 2-TetrachloroetbaneChloroethone2-Chloroethylvinyl EtherChlorofor*1.1-Dichloroethene1.2-Oichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropan«Trans-1 , 3-DlchloropropeneCie.l ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzeneMethylene ChlorideChloro»ethane

520

150010000

2604602000

3BO5300

BroaofornBroaodi chl or omt thaneFluorotrichloroaettumeChl or odibroMOMe thaneTetr*chloroetheneTolueneTrichlorottheneVinyl ChlorideAcetone2-EiutanoneCarbondisulf ide2 -Hexanone4 -Methyl -2-f-entanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesTotal VolatilesTotal Chlorinated VolatilesOTHER COMPOUNDS I NO-TOTAL UG/L1

61001 300019000

4100

J400

30006702044620

180

3903500

87150210

3501400

12

540 190

12

70

1100 240 15

21026

19

10

6B64

17

41004 1 005600

32001700

15002666715637

1000 2801000 2801200 340

110 120

1

49103910

14014941062

3030

1111

375375

tf HQ1AHE 7000 UC/LDUF - FIELD DUPLICATENDb - h('T DtTEXTTED BECAUSE Of BLANK CONTAMINATION

• \( (

MATE* QUALITV SAMPLINGDURING DRILLINGPHASE II HULLINGVEKONA WELL FIELDCASE 2a38

VOLATILE OBGAIIICS H2I H16I. Hlfcl Hlfcl(UG/Lt 73-BO 39-52' 52-60' 62-70'

AcroleinAcrylonitrileBenzeneCarbon Tetrachlorid*Chlorobenzene1.2-Dichloroetbane1.1.1-Trichloroethane 101,1-Dichloroethane 61.1,2-Trichloroethan*1,1.2.2-TetrachloroethaneChloro*thane2-Chloroetbylvinyl EtherCbloro/ora 111.1-Dichloroethenc 31.2-Dichloroethen* • 21,2-Dlchloropropan*Trana-l,3-DichloropropeneCis,1.3-01chloropropeneEthylbenzeneMethylene Chloride 2 140 25 SCh1or one t hanebro»o»ethaneBroBOfarmBroHodichloroBethaneFluorotr i chloro«ethaneChlorodibroHonethaneTetrachloroethene 19 S40 260 9TolueneTrichloroethene SVinyl ChlorideAcetone2-butnnoneC»rbondisulfide2-Heitanont•l-Methyl-2-FentanoneStyreneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesTotal Vol»tiles 40 fc^l 312 14

_. Total Chlorinated Volatile* 40 691 312 14t~p OTHER COMPOUNOS(NO-TOTAL UC/LtOCSCO

& HO iNt 7000 UC/L•"" DUP - FIELD DUPLICATECO NDb - HOT DETECTED BECAUSE OF tJLANK CONTAMINATION

APPENDIX E

QA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

WAMEVM

March 14, 1985C 11185

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

To: Kenneth J. Quinn

From: ,'lichael J. Llnskens

Re: Phase II Battle Creek Results: QA Rev iew

All results of Phase II volatile testing for 122 soil and water samples areacceptable under the ERA QA/QC review process. All results are consideredQuantitative. A more in-depth discussion of QA/QC as it relates to each ofthe individual contract laboratories used during Phase II is provided in thefollowing paragraphs.

All 16 soil samples collected in Phase II were sent to EnvlroOyne Engineers(EE) for analysis. The EPA review process found surrogate and matrix spikerecoveries to be within the acceptable limits for all samples. An unusuallylarge number of volatile compounds were found at significant concentrationsin laboratory analysis blanks. Since the procedure for the volatile methodfor son analysis Involves subsampHng the soil and addition of 5 mis oflaboratory blank water, followed by the normal purge and trap procedure,these laboratory contaminants were found in all samples. The results of fourlaboratory analysis blanks were provided by EE and the following compoundswere found to be laboratory contaminants in the concentration range given.

Contaminant Range (ppb)

Methylene chloride 88-1214-Methyl-2 pentanone 38-1042-Hexanone 49-110Toluene 5-72-Butanone 26-77Senzene 2-4Styrene 10-35o-Xylene 17-49Ethylbenzene 9-27Acetone 32-51Acrylonitrile 18-73

Results reported within five times (EE used 1 gram sample size; normal 5 grans)of the highest contamination level shown for the above compounds may be dueto laboratory contamination. All 16 soil samples {listed below with theirOrganic Traffic Report (OTR) numbers) seem to be contaminated at significantlevels by at least one of the above compounds.

WAPZYN

0003136

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM -2- "arch 14, 19S5Phase II Battle Creek Results: C 11185

QA Review

Sample I.D. OTR Number Sample I.D. QTR Number

HI E7301 H2 E7302H3 E73C3 H4 £7304B22-S3 E7310 321-S2 £7311B24-S2 E7312 B25-S2 E7313323-S2 'E7314 W14-SA-S2 E7315W14SA-S3 E7316 W14SA-S4 E7317W14SA-S4 E7318 W13S-S2 E7319W13S-S4 £7320 W13S-S6 E7321

A field duplicate was collected at sampling location W14SA-S4. The naincompound of interest, tetrachloroethene, did not reproduce well : 116 ppbversus 458 ppb. Poor replication 1n soil samples for volatile analysis isnot unusual.

Twenty-seven (27) water samples were sent to Environmental Research Group(ERG) for analysis. The surrogate recoveries were generally good for thesedata. Those surrogate recoveries outside of the contract quality controllimits were found to be slightly above the limits. Matrix spike and matrixspike duplicate results were found to be outside of the contract limits forfour out of five compounds. No data was provided for ERG laboratory analysisblanks. The field blank (Sample Field Number 010, OTR number E7328) sent toERG with these samples was found to have trace contamination for the compoundsmethylene chloride, chloroform, fluorotrlchloromethane and 2-butanone. Otherfield blanks (listed later) sent to different contract laboratories were alsofound to contain trace levels of these compounds as contaminants. Seven (7)samples, listed below, analyzed by ERG were not properly diluted.

Sample Field Number OTR Number

W13S E7334W14S E7335W14S E7336323 E4478T5 E4479824 £4480B25 E4481

For exanple, sample WHS was found to contain 10,500 ppb tetrachloroetheneand not diluted at all. A proper dilution for this amount of compound wouldbe 1 to 20 or 1 to 50. Results for these seven samples that exceed 200 ppb(the upper limit of the instrument standard curve for an undiluted sample)nay be biased somewhat high or somewhat low depending upon the compound ofinterest and the instrument used for analysis. It was noted 1n the EPA CA/QCreview that several compounds were quantified on a secondary ion basis, anindication of the above problem.

WARZYN

0003137

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM -3- Varch 14, 1965Phase II Battle Creek Results: C 11185

QA Review

The remaining 79 water samples were analyzed by IT Corporation. The data forthese samples appear to be excellent as far as precision ana accuracy. Allsurrogate and matrix spike duplicate recoveries *er« found to be within the£PA contract control limits. Results, for seven sets of field duplicates(W1I, B17I, B20, VJ4I, W9S, R18 and W7I) reinforce the excellent QA/QC reportgiven by the EPA review process. Results for each of the seven duplicatesets replicated well. Mine laboratory analysis blanks were provided by ITand only inethylene chloride was found (less than 10 ppb) as a contaminant.Field blanks (Sample Field Numbers Oil, 012, 014, 015 and 016) analyzed byIT again showed trace levels of chloroform, methylene chloride, acetone and2-butanone contamination.

MJL/cac[cwl-74-6]

WARZYN

000313

APPENDIX F

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION SHEETDOWCLENE*

WAffZYN

0003133

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE 22697SALES SPECIFICATION

PAGE: 1PRODUCT CODE: 22697 EFFECTIVE: 9 JUL 34 SUPERSEDES: 24 MAY 34

NAME: DOWCLENE <R> EC SOLVENT

DESC: COLORLESS LIQUID, FREE OF SUSPENDED MATTER AND SEDIMENT.

TEST ITEM ' : UNIT : LIMITS

APPEARANCE

TEST METHODS

VISUAL

i6322A;ASTM E20316322A;ASTM D210316322A;ASTM D210?VISUAL

16320;ASTM D1073

16320;ASTM D21 1 1

FREE OFSEDIMENT ANDSUSPENDED MATTER1001010

74-122 (NOTE 1>

P (NOTE 1)

WATER CONTENT, MAX. PPMCOLOR, APHA, MAX. PT-CONON-VOLATILE RESIDUE, MAX, PPM——TYPICAL PROPERTIES——DISTILLATION RANGE @760MM, IBP-DP CRELATIVE DENSITY (SPECIFICGRAVITY) 8 25/25 C

PI: 1423409 SAMPLEPI: 1013218 55 GAL DRPI: 1015213 BULK

SALES NOTE:(1) IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT MATERIAL MEETING THE LIMITS IMPOSED

UNDER 'TEST ITEMS' UILL FALL WITHIN THE LIMITS INDICATED. THESEARE NOT ROUTINE TEST ITEMS.

(2) OTHER,BLEND RATIOS CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE ON THE BASIS OF A CUSTOMERSPECIFICATION.

READ-PRECAUTIONARY INFORMATION AND MATERIAL SA.FETY DATASHEETS. THIS PRODUCT IS SHIPPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH AP-PLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CLASSIFICATION,PACKAGING, SHIPPING, AND LABELING.

(R) INDICATES A TRADEMARK OF THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANYLAST PAGE

0003140

M A T E R I A L S A F E T Y D A T A S H E E T PAGE: iOQUI CHEMICAL U.S.A. MIDLAND MICHIGAN 48640 EMERGENCY PHONE: 517*636-4400

EFFECTIVE DATE: 2? MAY 34 DATE PRINTED: 26 OCT 34 PRODUCT CODE: 2269?

PRODUCT NAME: DOWCLENE (R) EC SOLVENT MSD: 0077f .

INGREDIENTS (TYPICAL VALUES-NOT SPECIFICATIONS) : 7. :

1.1.1-TRICHLORQETHANE (NOMINAL) : 72.5 :PERCHLOROETHYLENE (NOMINAL) : 25 :

SECTION 1 PHYSICAL DATA

BOILING POINT: 165-252F, 74-122C : SOL. IN WATER: SLIGHTVAP PRESS: 35 MMHG 8 20C :' SP. GRAVITY: 1.335 @ 25/25C'./AP DENSITY (AIR = 1): 4.3 : X. VOLATILE BY VOL: 100 (ESSEN,>

APPEARANCE AND ODOR: COLORLESS LIQUID, IRRITATING ODOR AT HIGHCONCENTRATIONS.

SECTION 2 FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA

FLASH POINT: NONE " : FLAMMABLE LIMITSMETHOD USED: TOC, TCC, COC : LFL: 6.5X @ 50C UFL: 12.0% @ 50C

EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: WATER FOG.

SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND HAZARDS: SELF-CONTAINED, POSITIVEPRESSURE RESPIRATORY EQUIPMENT.,

i'ECTION 3 . REACTIVITY DATA

STAEHLITY' AVOID OPEN FLAMES, WELDING ARCS, OR OTHER HIGHfEhFERATIJRE SOURCES WHICH INDUCE THERMAL DECOMPOSITION. .

INCOnPATIBILITY: WATER-SLOW HYDROLYSIS PRODUCES CORROSIVE ACID. AVOIDPROLONGED CONTACT WITH OR STORAGE IN ALUMINUM OR ITS ALLOYS.^ METALLICALUMINUM AND ZINC POWDERS SHOULD BE AVOIDED.

HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION*PRODUCTS: HYDROGEN CHLORIDE AND VERY SMALLAMOUNTS OF PHOSGENE AND CHLORINE.

HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: WILL NOT OCCUR.

SECTION 4 SPILL. LEAK, AND DISPOSAL PROCEDURES

.'-iCnuN JO fAKE FOR SPILLS' SMALL SPILLS - MOP UP. WIPE UP OR SOAK UPliiiMEDlAiELr. REMOVE TO OUT-OF-DOORS,LiUVG£ SPtLLS - EVACUATrT. AREA, CONTAiN LIQUID. TR'ftNSFEP TO CLOSED METAL

000314I

M A T E R I A L S A F E T Y D A T A S H E E T RAGE' "DOU CHEMICAL U.S.A. MIDLAND MICHIGAN 48640 EMERGENCY RHONE: 517-63-6-4400

EFFECTIVE DATE: 29 MA/ 34 DATE PRINTED: 26 OCT 34 PRODUCT CODE- 6?7PRODUCT (CONT'D): DOUCLENE (R> EC SOLVENT MSD: 0077

SECTION 4 SPILL, LEAK, AND DISPOSAL PROCEDURES (CONTINUED)

ACTION TO TAKE FOR SPILLS: (CONTINUED)CONTAINERS. KEEP OUT OF WATER SUPPLY.

DISPOSAL METHOD: WHEN DISPOSING OF THE UNUSED CONTENTS, THE PREFERREDOPTIONS ARE TO SEND TO LICENSED RECLAIMER, OR TO PERMITTED INCINERATORS,IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS INCLUDINGSUBTITLE C OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT. DUMPING INTOSEWERS, ON THE GROUND, .OR INTO ANY BODY OF WATER IS STRONGLY DISCOURAGEDAND MAY BE ILLEGAL. CONSULT THE DOU CHEMICAL COMPANY FOR FURTHERINFORMATION.

SECTION 5 HEALTH HAZARD DATA

EYE: MAY CAUSE PAIN, AND SLIGHT TRANSIENT IRRITATION. VAPORS MAYIRRITATE EYES.

SKIN CONTACT: PROLONGED OR REPEATED EXPOSURE MAY CAUSE SKIN IRRITATION.MAY CAUSE MORE SEVERE RESPONSE IF CONFINED OR SKIN IS ABRADED.REPEATED CONTACT MAY CAUSE DEFATTING OF SKIN.

SKIN ABSORPTION: A SINGLE PROLONGED SKIN EXPOSURE IS NOT LIKELY TORESULT IN ABSORPTION OF HARMFUL AMOUNTS. THE LD50 FOR RABBITS IS>30,000 MG/KG.

INGESTION: SINGLE DOSE ORAL TQXICITY IS LOW. THE LD50 FOR RATSIS 14.35 G/KG. IF ASPIRATED, MAY CAUSE RAPID ABSORPTION THROUGHTHE LUNGS WHICH MAY RESULT IN SYSTEMIC EFFECTS.

INHALATION: MINIMAL ANESTHETIC OR NARCOTIC EFFECTS MAY BE SEEN OVER 500 PPMPROGRESSIVELY HIGHER LEVELS OVER 800 PPM MAY CAUSE EYE OR NASAL IRRI-TATION;" DIZZINESS, DRUNKENNESS; CONCENTRATIONS IN EXCESS OF 3,000 PPMCAN CAUSE UNCONSCIOUSNESS AND DEATH. IN CONFINED OR POORLY VENTILATEDAREAS, VAPORS WHICH READILY ACCUMULATE CAN CAUSE UNCONSCIOUSNESS ANDDEATH. THESE HIGH LEVELS MAY. ALSO CAUSE CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS(IRREGULAR HEARTBEATS).

SYSTEMIC & OTHER EFFECTS: REPEATED EXPOSURES MAY CAUSE LIVER.ANDKIDNEY EFFECTS. ' THE PREPONDERANCE OF INFORMATION INDICATESPFRCHLQROETHYLENE IS NOT LIKELY TO BE A CARCINOGEN IN MAN ALTHOUGH ONELIFETIME STUDY WITH TOXIC DOSES OF PERCHLOROETHYLENE GIVEN BY STOMACHTUBE INDICATED A CARCINOGENIC RESPONSE IN LABORATORY MICE. BUrNOT INRATS EXPOSED BY INGESTION OR INHALATION.

SECTION 6 FIRST AID

EYES: IRRIGATE IMMEDIATELY WITH WATER FOR AT LEAST 5 MINUTES.

SKIN: WASH OFF IN FLOWING WATER OR SHOWER. WASH CONTAMINATEDCLOTHING BEFORE REUSE.

(CONTINUED ON PAGE 3 )(R) INDICATES A TRADEMARK OF THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY

000314

M A T E R I A L S A F E T Y D A T A S M E E T PAGE' 3DOU CHEMICAL U.S.A. MIDLAND MICHIGAN 43640 EMERGENCY PHONE- 517-436-4400

EFFECTIVE DATE: 29 MAY 84 DATE PRINTED- 26 GCT 84 PRODUCT CODE 697PRODUCT (CONT'D): DOWCLENE <R> EC SOLVENT rtSD: 0077

SECTION 6 FIRST AID (CONTINUED)

INGESTION: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING- CALL A PHYSICIAN AND/OR TRANSPORT TOEMERGENCY FACILITY IMMEDIATELY.

INHALATION: REMOVE TO FRESH AIR. IF NOT BREATHING, GIVE MOUTH-TO-MOUTHRESUSCITATION. IF BREATHING IS DIFFICULT. GIVE OXYGEN. CALL APHYSICIAN.

NOTE TO PHYSICIAN: BECAUSE RAPID ABSORPTION MAY OCCUR THROUGH LUNGS IF ASPIRAAND CAUSE SYSTEMIC. EFFECTS, THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INDUCE VOMITINGOR NOT SHOULD BE MADE BY AN ATTENDING PHYSICIAN. IF LAVAGE IS PERFORMED,SUGGEST ENDOTRACHEAL AND/OR ESOPHAGEAL CONTROL. DANGER FROM LUNG ASPIRA-TION MUST BE WEIGHED AGAINST TOXICITY WHEN CONSIDERING EMPTYING THESTOMACH. EXPOSURE MAY INCREASE 'MYOCARDIAL IRRITABILITY'. DO NOT ADMIN-ISTER SYMPATHOMIMETIC DRUGS UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. NO SPECIFICANTIDOTE. SUPPORTIVE CARE. TREATMENT BASED ON JUDGMENT OF THE PHYSICIANIN RESPONSE TO REACTIONS OF THE PATIENT.

SECTION 7 SPECIAL HANDLING INFORMATION

EXPOSURE GUIDELINE(S) : 1 , 1 , 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE - OSHA STANDARD IS 350 PPM ANDCURRENT ACGIH TLV IS 350 PPM (450 PPM STEL ) ; PERCHLOROETHYLENE - OSHASTANDARD IS 1 OO PPM AND CURRENT ACGIH TLV IS 50 PPM.

VENTILATION: PROVIDE GENERAL AND/OR LOCAL EXHAUST VENTILATION TO CONTROLAIRBORNE LEVELS BELOW THE EXPOSURE GUIDELINES.

RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: APPROVED ORGANIC VAPOR-TYPE RESPIRATOR REQUIRED INABSENCE OF PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. FOR EMERGENCIES, APOSITIVE-PRESSURE BREATHING APPARATUS OR A FULL-FACE RESPIRATOR WITHAN APPROVED ORGANIC VAPOR CANISTER IS RECOMMENDED.

PROTECTIVE CJ.OTHING: NO SPECIAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING NEEDED. HOWEVER,FOR FREQUENT OR PROLONGED CONTACT, USE GLOVES MADE OF VITON,NEOPRENE, OR POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; BOOTS AND APRON DEPENDING UPONTME EXTENT jftND SEVERITY OF EXPOSURE. LIKELY.

EYE PROTECTION: SAFETY GLASSES. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT AN EYE-WASHSTATION BE AVAILABLE.

SECTION 3 SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: AVOID PROLONGED ORFREQUENTLY REPEATED SKIN CONTACT. AVOID BREATHING VAPORS. STORE INA COOL PLACE. VAPORS OF- THIS PRODUCT ARE HEAVIER THAN AIR AND WILLCOLLECT IN LOW AREAS SUCH AS PITS, DEGREASERS, STORAGE TANKS, ANDOTHER CONFINED AREAS. DO NOT ENTER THESE AREAS WHERE VAPORS OF .THIS PRODUCT ARE SUSPECTED UNLESS SPECIAL BREATHING APPARATUS IS USEDAND AN OBSERVER IS PRESENT FOR ASSISTANCE.

1 ,1 , i --TRICHLOROETHANE PRODUCTS SHOULD NOT BE PACKAGED IN ALUMINUMAEROSOL CANS OR WITH FINELY DIVIDED ALUMINUM OR ITS ALLOYS IN ANAEROSOL CAN.

(CONTINUED ON PACE 4 0003143

M A T E R I A L S A F E T Y D A T A S H E E T PAGE 4-*OW CHEMICAL U.S.A. MIDLAND MICHIGAN 43640 EMERGENCY PHONE: 517-636-4400

EFFECTIVE DATE: 29 MAf 84 DATE PRINTED: 26 OCT 84 PRODUCT CODE; 22697PRODUCT (CONT'D): DOtdCLENE (R) EC SOLVENT MSD: 0077

SECTION 3 SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

•RECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: (CONTINUED)

ALUMINUM IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PUMPS,MIXERS, FITTINGS, STORAGE TANKS FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE PRODUCTSOR FORMULATIONS. METALLIC ALUMINUM AND ZINC POWDERS SHOULD BEAVOIDED.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON TOXICITY, HANDLING PRECAUTIONS, ANDFIRST AID, REFER TO CHLORINATES SOLVENTS LITERATURE FORM NO. 100-5792.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: REVISED SECTIONS: 2 AND 4.

LAST PAGE(R) INDICATES A TRADEMARK OF THE DOU CHEMICAL COMPANY*HE INFORMATION HEREIN IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH, BUT NO WARRANTY,iXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE. CONSULT THE DOU CHEMICAL COMPANYFOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

000314]

APPENDIX G

REVISED DRAWINGSFOR

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMPHASE I DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING

WAftXYN

0003145

rl ^ ^I i - V- f.1

[Li VAT IMS

JOVTH DOCK

TANK TRUCK UNLOADING ARC*P———

tAST DOCK UNOERCKHMO TANK AREA

••11 I IB

1. Sit FIGURES ii 10 FOR GCNEML NOUSAND ltO.HO.

2. VAiUES INDICATE TOTAL CHLORINATED VOLA1ILEOfUWIC COMPOUNDS RESULTS FROM SOIL ANALYSIS(bG/KC). Stl APPENDICES FOR DETECTION LIMITSAND SPECIFIC RESULTS.

I. All SAMPLES COILtCUO DICfHRfR 19B3-

E1

FIGURE 11SECTION {-['IOTA1 CM.ORINAUU VULDATMOHD ROAD FACILITY

fttMfDIALVERONA UtLi Fl f lDtAIUt CRtfK. HJCH1U*

0003147

ELEVATIONS

TANK TRUCK LWLOA01HG AREA

SOUTH DOCK ' E«l HOCK UNDERGROUND I*"*. AM A

2 SEE f JUUtt 1 FOR C«OiS &ECT1GM lOLAHUN

[ L E V A T I O M L

•M

6*0

Bib

810

US

•20

eii

-

31

I

-

2

r"'"1

0 I* •»

o » 10

^

V

:

I i

SAND

SECTION E-E'

NOTES

—— ——————————

•

V

-

1. i£t H6U« i FOR UNERAi MIES AMD UUND

•u

MS

B40

U10

FIGURE 10StCMON l-f.'IHtWAi SOLVEN1RAtHUNO ROAD UULMi

820

HI HI DIM IHYliT ItAl ILViVINUNA HLU FlElDMITLl CREEK. MltHIW

^ MT W(, NI.

000314S

D

L Tl

J

D'

tu

no

HI

iii

•i*

r - mi* a IKK.« *iu«iiii lu iim<>i —— fLMfiwt/ X 1 i 1

i i—— WPKJ.IIHH (JUMU WtflCl -- — POCK ,,

—

<-

«,

1

:

i

^

SAND

2 ————————————————i <.-

1

a

ui-

110-

u

9

a,-

• — ~

nn-

L

•

] Ml 1 I«J«1 i UU b >«l UWM. 1.1111 MH1

P

§

IM-

,..-

k

2

M*-

«•--

^_^r-

~-~"~

|.)

H-

/I

/

i-

WEATHEREDSANDSTONE

1

=E

=

J10-

X.

L;!»-

I4J-

t •

...

11 -

J -

"'t

1*0-,

IIJ

|

•i

I -

' :

<1

LIUMI

j yfcWi INIUJIU IUIAI imumuilu mi.tlui * ttiwii mm BinijJ'- »-' f"*1 *•'!OMJUIC (OmuiUl USUlll HUB Mill MWl'l 1 tlBiUill". Mllllli IK , 111 Hit ll-M

\ _- - - - - ' r

" ' I

SAND' -

v

•~^--_

~ "—•—.-.'

1 * ———— * ________ .^

| , » m -

'" . —————— j———— - ,-. -_

.

.-,

'

lUb/IC) Ul WMUliUl', 10* MHC1 W UK I', '«• DlituiiH"

, „,,«,,,,«.. M.US „„. «,,«„„ SECTION D-D

IW

Hi

HO

tit

HI

0003140

DD

i~~ I Mini I* BX.a ax. WUUIHI IL, ,Ki

SAND

WEATHEREDSANDSTONE

,SECT,ON__ D-D ,

MOUi^

1 UI HUM •. F(W UMUi I*JH- ULi ilUHP

Ul MUM 2 'OK CH011 HillW LWJIIIUB

ar

O0031.rj(

1U7 // /

SHALE

.»**-

SAND/SAND &GHAVEL

SECTION A-A

-,-,

// >^

/ X' ^/ s.-'

•

i ii

SHAU

000315i

I 3

i §

! «!=-; * < S*. 5 i aI* ; S i - , -is ! I ii I :

=1 i ? *a s iI ! iM ! ill !

E3 3D a 9

ii

5 I3 l

iiii '-i

: 23- <!i|5 Mi j«i siPx iiB&ih:! H

Oii* i s

'•., v.^r-ti'!'i • t V" ; ' -f- -1 '.' ' • ' • * > ' : f,Mj

< • .)' : ) 5J-- "if,. '! '.}-'..-.»' : ' •!: . • '•i

f!

i1:

iSAND/ SAND •

—— — — _ ,_n _

.

• -S

:

"• b

!

~ ——— ~-——— mSAND/SAND & GRAVEL

* —————— =

"

SANDSTONE

QUOj |

RAYMOND P '3

T6

LEGEND

""."""" P*VED TOAD

WO I ~ ~ ~ UNWHfED «O»0

IN AIL

BUILDlNb

RAILROAD

—— j— '

WlOGE

WALL

CULVERTWATCH 01DRAINAGE

rn

21

FENCE

GUARD RAIL

0 UIDClUaOUWO TANK (3) MANHOLERISE-

O1 FlRE H1DHANT

75

SO IOO

CO

mm

•Hit

I. M( flMM I fOt CHUM. Mill.

i. I*M louiiMi iwiuii tin ut

ISO

>M WKHUUMlD

FIGURE 3THOMAS SOLVENTMrHONO ROAD FACILITY

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONVERONA WELL FIELDBATTLE CREEK. MICHIGAN

WARZYN

DUG. NO.i.-HJ00031,',,'

LEGEND

Do

FWVED KOAD

UNfWtD "O AD

eun DIN&

RAILROAD

FENCE

GUARD RAIL

TRANSMISSIONT OwC ft

TANK

n CULVER/— •—-y M>AI[R c

^- — CRAIMAGIHLt

. • t[)Gt OFFOLIAGE

O POLE

A" "tLL

©FIRE nlOhHf,

MOTIt

KU MT WM0 »T fMICte At UAL (F»UiMr. ifM). if. LCCAtW M fUMUM MtET tf -V Mi *•' Ullll WUS

IMllCt II OIICMO «««. M«l (fUMWI, IIM).

1. M*. *(* M* f If tUf lAU t«UT>« Mi (l(«* II (Hi MiU I•Ut NlilMNUII Mil Alt MM M» MUM flUI MlItlAIIM.

4. KM I Mi A -I IMIM4[fi il UCl taKlLtlM MK

FIGURE 2THOMAS SOLVENTANNEX FACILITY

REHEDIAl INVESTIGATIONVERONA WELL FIELDBATTLE CHEEK. MICHIGAN

DWG. NCllJdi,

'</• ( ^•k, -, .*- t ^A

APPENDIX H

REVISED DRAWINGSFOR

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUMPHASE I WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

)

)

WAAZVN

000315o

] •,-.: '! 1 T*i ! - H - ^ . {, !*

1 i

oo

IN

1v«*•*

v ?

*v»

v* 1V*»

-V•*

J

* £>/V 'r<y ' */

i>3

a

I5

jj

IIi!i!ii

*MIf!ii!

if= *litj115ii?':1!>i

fni *! !«• I!5 *£* *ii if

3»J

1

t

ti

1i

s

«

LEGENOJ NTMIl

B "a

H*B IIM I* IUMI «•. IHtl 11 UIHI ULl. l««a ItIII* N OMM MINI (V. v-». U).

Jj] kM«*UMl (I | I HIIIlKtLl) taiLl HUI1PII*

[Jl HH (!• MB IB Ull UWM <». A. X)

r ||M U *(MI MM, »• III I.

WELL DETAL

L..-JI000316(1

I ' \ i\ =i *S i l! | l i

rL

tf A? 9 ,* r- tj? v \ * w **/ \*\'1/

V *».

;• A?

i*

Csoou;Ci

H1^i 4* ;*s ii?: if

'*

Planning Field TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM … SITK CONTROL DIVISION Remedial Planning Field Investigation...

Documents

Transcript of Planning Field TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM … SITK CONTROL DIVISION Remedial Planning Field Investigation...