PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the...
-
Upload
kate-kilton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the...
![Page 1: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PK and PD as predictors of clinical PK and PD as predictors of clinical effecteffect
![Page 2: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
•drug action– the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site
e.g. receptor, carrier, channel
•drug effect– a measurable consequence of drug binding or drug action
e.g. EEC change, QT prolongation
•drug response– a desirable or undesirable clinical outcome
e.g. reduced frequency of seizures, reduction in blood pressure
![Page 3: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
How do we find and test new drugs?
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
clinical
○ dose ranging (empirical)
○ PKPD modeling
○ optimal study design
preclinical
○ screening (empirical)
○ molecular modeling
○ molecular design
screening learning design
![Page 4: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
…modeling may be understood as mechanized intuition
applying the rules of
– biology
– logic
– mathematics
– statistics
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
![Page 5: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
to learn from experience
to develop models based on data………what data do we need?
Preclinical:
◦ affinities of active drug molecules for the binding site (in vitro, in situ, in vivo)
◦ mechanism between binding and measurable effect including auto-regulation (feedback, synthesis)
◦ in vivo: dose(time) – concentration(time) – measurable effect(time)
![Page 6: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
to learn from experience
to develop models based on data………what data do we need?
Clinical:
◦ ideally everything measured in the preclinical program (in vivo affinities will be difficult to obtain), but at least the
following:
dose(time)
concentration(time)
effect(time)
◦ in addition, drug response data as a function of time
![Page 7: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
How can this strategy be incorporated into R&D planning?
◦ Every preclinical experiment and every clinical study is designed to add data to the PKPD knowledge base.
◦ The modeling and simulation (M&S) scientist participates in the project teams.
◦ For the M&S scientist there exists no boundary between preclinical and clinical development.
The design route will prove to be faster than the “shortcut”.
![Page 8: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
…from the work of EMF-Consulting: Example1
Selection of optimal doses for a new anti-epileptic drug
to be tested in patients.M. Marchand1, O. Petricoul1, E. Fuseau1, D. Bentley2, D. Critchley2
1 EMF consulting, BP 2, 13545 Aix en Provence, France2 EISAI Global Clinical Development, 3 Shortlands, London W6 8EE, UK
○ Rufinamide modulates the activity of sodium channels thus suppressing seizures induced by electroshock (maximal electroshock, MES) or by injection of pentylenetrazole (PTZ) in mice (PD). In clinical studies, rufinamide significantly reduced seizure frequency (PD).
○ Drug X is a new chemical entity with a novel mechanism of action. It shows anticonvulsant effects in rodents. The dose(time)-concentration(time) relationship (PK) was studied in epileptic patients.
![Page 9: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
○ PKPD modeling in mice:
− Population PKPD modeling used NONMEM. − A one-compartment model with first order
elimination was chosen for both rufinamide and Drug X.
− For PKPD modelling, drug concentrations were predicted in male mice according to weight, the administered dose in mg/kg, population PK parameters (previously estimated), and time of test.
![Page 10: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
PKPD modeling in mice – where are the problems?+ mice are cheap+ mice are genetically well defined+ small interindividual variability
− mice are small− difficult to dose accurately− difficult to obtain more than one blood sample
![Page 11: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
PKPD modeling in mice – Population approach:
Population PK model based on toxicokinetic data
-free choice oral dosing (continuous input during dark hours)
-blood sampling at steady state
-destructive, only one sample per mouse
Cl/F =DR
Css
-oral dosing by gavage (controlled time of drug input)
-blood sampling after single or multiple doses
-destructive, only one sample per mouse
C(t)=D·ka
V/F·(ka – k) · (e-k·t
− e-ka·t
)
![Page 12: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
PKPD modeling in mice – Population approach:
Population PD model using predicted individual concentrations at the time of the effect measurement
Individual concentrations are predicted based on:
-the dose given at the PD experiment
-the gender and weight of the mouse
-the time of the effect measurement after the dose
-the population PK model
![Page 13: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
50
max
CCONC
ECONCDV
Emax = 100% (FIXED)C50 = 1.35 g/mL = 5.98 Rufinamide concentrations (g/mL)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
% o
f m
ice
pro
tect
ed
fro
m t
on
ic h
ind
limb
se
izu
re
0
20
40
60
80
100
ObservationsPredictions
Rufinamide data: Observed and predicted % of protected mice from MES Test
![Page 14: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
50
max
CCONC
ECONCDV
Emax = 76.4%
C50 = 1.64 g/mL
Rufinamide data: observed and predicted % of protected mice from PTZ Test
Rufinamide concentrations (g/mL)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
% o
f m
ice
pro
tect
ed
fro
m c
lon
ic s
eizu
re
0
20
40
60
80
100
ObservationsPredictions
![Page 15: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
Drug X data: observed and predicted % of protected mice from MES Test
50
max
CCONC
ECONCDV
Emax = 100% (FIXED)C50 = 141.6 ng/mL = 4.56
Drug X concentrations (ng/mL)
0 50 100 150 200 250
% o
f m
ice
pro
tect
ed
fro
m t
on
ic h
ind
limb
se
izu
re
0
20
40
60
80
100
ObservationsPredictions
![Page 16: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
50
max
CCONC
ECONCDV
Emax = 100% (FIXED)C50 = 88.1 ng/mL
Drug X concentrations (ng/mL)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
% o
f m
ice
pro
tect
ed
fro
m c
lon
ic s
eizu
re
0
20
40
60
80
100
ObservationsPredictions
Drug X data: observed and predicted % of protected mice from PTZ Test
![Page 17: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
PKPD modeling in patients:
Cavss rufinamide concentrations (g/mL)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pre
dict
ed to
tal s
eizu
re f
requ
ency
per
28
days
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
avsse CfrequencyseizuretotalLog 0187.0893.0)(
Rufinamide: PD model based on clinical data
![Page 18: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
Link from mice to humans:assumes that the effective concentrations in mice are also effective in humans
A generic mathematical link function (Weibull) was used to relate rufinamide preclinical effects to its clinical response (Loge of total seizure frequency over a period of 28 days).
![Page 19: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1Rufinamide preclinical effect (MES test): the link function shows that effective concentrations in the preclinical MES test are not effective clinically.Is the approach wrong? Not necessarily, but MES is definitely not a suitable preclinical test.
Predicted % of protected mice from tonic hind limb seizure
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pre
dict
ed L
oge
(tot
al s
eizu
re f
requ
ency
per
28
days
)
-2.8
-2.6
-2.4
-2.2
-2.0
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
an ideal relationship:
50% protected mice are related to half the maximal reduction in seizure frequency in patients.
![Page 20: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
Rufinamide preclinical effect (PTZ test): the link function shows that concentrations which protect more than 50% of mice also reduce total seizure frequency per 28 days in patients. The relationship is not ideal but sensitive enough to be used for the following extrapolation (next slide).
Predicted % of protected mice from clonic seizure
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pre
dic
ted
Lo
g e (t
ota
l se
izu
re f
requ
en
cy p
er
28
days
)
-2.8
-2.6
-2.4
-2.2
-2.0
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
Weibull Function
![Page 21: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
○ Extrapolation from known to unknown:
− assuming that the link between the preclinical and the clinical test is generally valid and independent of the pharmacologic agent used to cause the response,
− the PTZ preclinical effect measurements of Drug X are used to predict total seizure frequency per 28 days (clinical response).
![Page 22: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
The link function is now applied to drug X: whatever drug X concentration is related to 70% of mice protected from seizures (PTZ test) is expected to be related to a clinical response of 28·e-1.3 =7.6 seizures in 28 days, a minimal response.
Predicted % mice protected from clonic seizure
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pre
dic
ted L
og e
(to
tal s
eiz
ure
fre
qu
en
cy p
er
28
days
)
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Answer: ~200ng/ml
![Page 23: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
○ Extrapolation from response to concentration:
− the preclinical PD model for PTZ test of Drug X is used to predict the concentration in humans necessary to achieve a certain clinical response.
− knowing… that for rufinamide the link function relates effective concentrations in mice to effective concentrations in humans.
− assuming… that the link function has general applicability and is thus also valid for drug X.
![Page 24: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
Drug X: Finding the necessary concentrations to achieve a certain total seizure frequency per 28 days (response)
Drug X concentrations (ng/mL)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pre
dic
ted
to
tal s
eiz
ure
fre
que
ncy
pe
r 2
8 d
ays
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
![Page 25: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
○ Extrapolation from concentration to dose:
− a PK model for Drug X established in epileptic patients in a phase IIa pilot study is used to predict the dosing regimen to produce the necessary concentrations.
− this PK model takes the drug interaction with CYP3A4 inducers into account. The recommended dosage is stratified accordingly:
![Page 26: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
In order to achieve similar decrease (2.8 per 28 days) of total seizure frequency as with a typical Cavss (15 μg/ml) of rufinamide, the following daily doses for Drug X are likely to produce a Cavss of 215 ng/mL:
○ Sub-population 1, without co-administration of CYP3A4 inducers: 1.8 units ○ Sub-population 1, with co-administration of CYP3A4 inducers: 7.7 units○ Sub-population 2, without co-administration of CYP3A4
inducers: 4 units○ Sub-population 2, with co-administration of CYP3A4 inducers: 15 units
Note: a Cavss of 215 ng/mL was observed in healthy subjects following repeated daily doses of 4 units which were well tolerated.
![Page 27: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
PKPD workshop: Example 1PKPD workshop: Example 1
workshop…english
atelier……..français
Werkstatt…deutsch
This is not a place to shop for work but a place to work.
Before I go on to my second example I would like to solicit contributions, comments, anecdotes… from the attendees.
![Page 28: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
…from the work of EMF-Consulting: Example 2
Selection of an optimal biomarker for neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitors in humans.
A.C. Heatherington, S. Sultana, R. Hidi, M. Boucher, E. Fuseau, M. Marchand, P. Ellis, S.W. Martin Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich, UK; EMF Consulting, Aix-en-Provence, France
Objectives:○ to select a reliable soluble biomarker for NEP inhibitors○ to compare clinical PD models to in vitro PD models○ to build a suitable PKPD model to optimally design future
clinical studies
![Page 29: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Background:Neutral endopeptidase (NEP) is a metallopeptidase enzyme involved in the degradation of a number of endogenous peptides, including
○ vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)○ substance P○ endothelins (hydrolysis of big endothelin, Big ET-1, to endothelin)○ atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP).
It is hypothesized that NEP inhibitors would increase VIP leading to enhanced vasodilatation in genital tissues. Two molecules, UK-447,841 (in vitro IC50 10 nM) and UK-505,749 (in vitro IC50 1.1nM), have undergone pharmacological evaluation to assess their effect on plasma Big ET-1 and ANP levels.
![Page 30: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Studies: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers
UK-447,841 UK-505,749 Design Cross-over Parallel group Cross-over Dosing Single escalating oral
doses, 3 to 800 mg
Multiple daily oral doses, 100, 400
and 800 mg
Single escalating oral doses,
0.1 to 540 mg PK data 14 samples up to 48 h 13 + 15 up to 48h 14 samples up to 48h PD data
(big ET-1 and ANP) 3 samples up to 8h
7 samples up to 12h
7 samples up to 12h
![Page 31: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Time (h)
0 10 20 30 40 50
UK
-44
7,8
41 m
ed
ian c
once
ntr
atio
n
(mg/L
)
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
1003 mg10 mg30 mg100 mg200 mg400 mg800 mg
UK-447,841
median PK data, Phase I, healthy volunteers
![Page 32: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
Time (h)0 10 20 30 40 50
UK
-505,7
49 m
edia
n c
once
ntr
atio
n
(mg/L
)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100 0.1 mg0.3 mg1 mg3 mg10 mg30 mg90 mg270 mg540 mg
UK-505,749
median PK data, Phase I, healthy volunteers
![Page 33: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Combined PKPD population model (NONMEM) fortwo drugs (PK) and two biomarkers (PD indirect response model for Big ET-1 and ANP)
•the NEP inhibitors slow down the degradation (kout1,2) of Big ET-1 and ANP •Big ET-1 stimulates production rate (kin2) of ANP
•ANP stimulates production rate (kin1) of Big ET-1
•age enhances production rate (kin2) of ANP •Emax , the maximum decrease in kout , is the same for both drugs but different
for ANP (41%) and for Big ET-1 (66%) •age increases Emax for ANP•IC50, the drug concentration at half-maximal effect, if different for Big ET-1
and ANP and different for UK-505,749 and UK-447,841•also in vivo UK-505,749 is 10 times more potent than UK-447,841
![Page 34: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
kin1kout1
kin2kout2
Emax
IC50IC50
Emax 2
Pop PK model
Pop PD model
IC50 IC50
RCIC
CE
CIC
CEkk
pred
pred
pred
predoutin
)505()505(50
)505(max
)447()447(50
)447(max )()(1
Response compartment
η (IIV)
Cpred (447)
Cpred (505)
Age effect (+)
Age effect (+)
ANP
η (IIV)
η (IOV)
η (IIV)
η (IIV)
η (IIV)
η (IIV)BigET1
+
+
PD indirect response model for Big ET-1 and ANP
![Page 35: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Time (h)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Media
n B
ig E
T-1
(pg/m
L)
0
2
4
6
8
10Doses 3 to 800 mg of UK-447,841Doses 0.1 to 540 mg of UK-505,749
![Page 36: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Time (h)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Me
dia
n A
NP
(pg
/mL
)
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Doses 3 to 400 mg of UK-447,841Doses 0.1 to 540 mg of UK-505,749
![Page 37: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
UK-505,749 predicted concentration in effect compartment (mg/L)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Big
En
do
the
lin (
pg/m
L)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
observed Big ET1Population prediction of Big ET1Individual prediction of Big ET1
![Page 38: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
after UK447,841 treatment
Time (h)
0 5 10 15 20
Big
E c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
s (
pg
/mL
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
P5, P50 and P95 SimP5, P50 and P95 Obs
(3 to 800 mg)
![Page 39: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
after UK505,749 treatment
Time (h)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Big
E c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
s (
pg
/mL
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
P5, P50 and 95 SimP5, P50 and P95 Obs
(0.1 to 540 mg)
![Page 40: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
after UK447,841 treatment
Time (h)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
AN
P c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
s (
pg
/mL
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
P5, P50 and P95 SimP5, P50 and P95 Obs
(3 to 400 mg)
![Page 41: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
after UK505,749 treatment
Time (h)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
AN
P c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
s (
pg
/mL
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
P5, P50 and P95 SimP5, P50 and P95 Obs
(0.1 to 540 mg)
![Page 42: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
PKPD workshop: Example 2PKPD workshop: Example 2
Conclusion
○ Big ET-1 plasma concentration and, to a lesser extent, ANP plasma concentration can be used as a pharmacological biomarker for the inhibitory drug effect on enzyme (NEP) activity in healthy volunteers.
○ Big ET-1 has ideal characteristics of a soluble biomarker: it demonstrates dose-concentration-effect, time-linearity, reproducibility of effect with similar Emax for two NEP inhibitors.
○ The ratio of the in vivo IC50 of the 2 compounds is similar to the in vitro ratio. This allows extrapolation between species and between different drugs.
![Page 43: PK and PD as predictors of clinical effect. 2 PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I drug action – the interaction of the drug molecule at the binding site.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070308/551b9a1c550346167e8b56db/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
PKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase IPKPD workshop at AGAH/Club Phase I
I hope to meet many of you again at the PAGE meeting in June 2007 in Copenhagen!