Chapter 8 Ion Implantation Instructor: Prof. Masoud Agah
description
Transcript of Chapter 8 Ion Implantation Instructor: Prof. Masoud Agah
C08- 1Virginia Tech
Chapter 8Ion Implantation
Instructor: Prof. Masoud Agah
C08- 2Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION
Two problems associated with diffusion especially for IC fabrication:– High-temperature process– Unable to provide shallow junction depths
Ion implantation is a relatively simple means to place a known number of atoms in a wafer.
Ion implantation process:– Ionization of the dopant source to form positive ions– Acceleration of ions through a high voltage field to reach the required
energy– Projection of high-energy ions towards the wafer surface (target)– Collision of ions with silicon atoms resulting in energy loss– End of penetration of ions in the substrate (coming to rest)
C08- 3Virginia Tech
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
May achieve better control of distribution of dopants
versus depth with ion implantation
Process can be faster
Process does not require as much thermal
processing
C08- 4Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION SYSTEM
Ion implanter is a high-voltage accelerator of high-
energy impurity ions
Major components are:
– Ion source (gases such as AsH3 , PH3 , B2H6)
– Mass Spectrometer (selects the ion of interest.
Gives excellent purity control)
– HV Accelerator (voltage up to 1 MeV)
– Scanning System (x-y deflection plates for
electronic control)
– Target Chamber (vacuum)
C08- 5Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION SYSTEM
Cross-section of an ion implanter
2
1
3
90o
analyzingmagnet
25 kV
Ionsouce
Resolving aperture
R R R
C C C
0 to 175kV
Accelerationtube
Focus
Neutral beam trapand beam gate
Neutral beam
Beam trap
y-axisscanner x-axis
scanner4
5
Wafer in process chamber
Integrator
Q
C08- 6Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION SYSTEM
Cross-section of an
ion implanter
ELECTROSTATICDEFLECTION
TARGET
IONACCELERATION
MAGNET
IONSOURCE
IONEXTRACTION
IONSEPARATION
MAGNET
MAGNETANODE
ANODEFILAMENTCATHODE
SOURCE OFELEMENT
ELECTROSTATICDEFLECTION
TARGET
IONACCELERATION
MAGNET
IONSOURCE
IONEXTRACTION
IONSEPARATION
MAGNET
MAGNETANODE
ANODEFILAMENTCATHODE
SOURCE OFELEMENT
C08- 7Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION
High energy ion enters crystal lattice and collides with
atoms and interacts with electrons
Each collision or interaction reduces energy of ion
until it comes to rest
Interactions are a complex distribution. Models have
been built and tested against observation
C08- 8Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION
To prevent channeling, implantation is normally performed at an angle of about 8° off the normal to the wafer surface.
An annealing step is required to repair crystal damage and to electrically activated the dopants.
The implanted dose can be accurately measured by monitoring the ion beam current.
Complex-doping profiles can be produced by superimposing multiple implants having various ion energies and doses.
Lateral scattering effects are smaller than lateral diffusion.
Expensive $$$$$
C08- 9Virginia Tech
ION IMPLANTATION
Projected range (RP): the average distance an ion travels before it stops.
Projected straggle (RP): deviation from the projected range due to multiple collisions.
http://eserver.bell.ac.uk
C08- 10Virginia Tech
MODEL FOR ION IMPLANTATION
Distribution is Gaussian
Np = peak concentration
Rp = range
Rp = straggle
N x N ( x – Rp ) 2 Rp p( ) exp 22
C08- 11Virginia Tech
MODEL FOR ION IMPLANTATION
The implanted impurity
profile can be
approximated by the
Gaussian distribution
function.
For an implant
contained within silicon:
Q = (2π)0.5
NP RP
C08- 12Virginia Tech
MODEL FOR ION IMPLANTATION
Model developed by Lindhard, Scharff and Schiott
(LSS)
Range and straggle roughly proportional to energy
over wide range
Ranges in Si and SiO2 roughly the same
Computer models now available at low cost for PCs
C08- 13Virginia Tech
MODEL FOR ION IMPLANTATION
Range of impurities in Si
10 100 1000Acceleration energy (keV)
Rp
0.01
0.1
1.0 B
P
As
Sb
Pro
ject
ed r
ange
(m
)
C08- 14Virginia Tech
MODEL FOR ION IMPLANTATION
Straggle of impurities in Si
BSb
AsP
Rp
R
0.10
0.01
0.00210 100 1000
Acceleration energy (keV)
Nor
mal
and
tran
sver
se s
trag
gle
(m
)
C08- 15Virginia Tech
SiO2 AS A BARRIER
SiO2 serves as an excellent barrier against ion-implantation
SiO2Silicon
Np
NB
N(X0)
0 Rp X0 Depth, x
C08- 16Virginia Tech
SiO2 AS A BARRIER
The minimum oxide thickness for selective implantation:
Xox = RP + RP (2 ln(10NP/NBulk))0.5
An oxide thickness equal to the projected range plus six times the straggle should mask most ion implants.
A silicon nitride barrier layer needs only be 85% of the thickness of an oxide barrier layer.
A photoresist barrier must be 1.8 times the thickness of an oxide layer under the same implantation conditions.
Metals are of such a high density that even a very thin layer will mask most implantations.
C08- 17Virginia Tech
ADVANTAGES
Advantages over diffusion:
– low temperature process
– allows wider range of barrier materials
– permits wider range of impurities
– better control of dose
– wider range of dose
– can control impurity concentration profile
– can introduce very shallow layers
C08- 18Virginia Tech
PROFILE CONTROL
Various shapes of profiles can be created by varying the energy of the incident beam
200 KILOELECTRONVOLTS
FINAL PROFILE
100
50
2010
15
10
5
00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
DEPTH (NANOMETERS)
NIT
RO
GE
N C
ON
CE
NT
RA
TIO
N (
AT
OM
IC P
ER
CE
NT
)
C08- 19Virginia Tech
RADIATION DAMAGE
Impact of incident ions knocks atoms off lattice sites With sufficient dose, can make amorphous Si layer
C08- 20Virginia Tech
RADIATION DAMAGE
Critical dose to make layer amorphous varies with temperature and impurity
Radiation damage can be removed by annealing at 800-1000oC for 30 min. After annealing, almost all impurities become electronically active.
1018
1017
1016
1015
1014
1013
Temperature, 1000/T (K-1)
B
P
SbCri
tical
dos
e (a
tom
/cm
2 )
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C08- 21Virginia Tech
Ion Implantation
Implanting through a sacrificial oxide layer:
– Large ions (arsenic) can be slowed down a little before
penetrating into the silicon.
– The crystal lattice damage is suppressed (at the expense
of the depth achieved).
– Collisions with the thin masking layer tends to cause the
dopant ions to change direction randomly, thereby
suppressing channeling effect.
– The concentration peak can be brought closer to the silicon
surface.
C08- 22Virginia Tech
Ion Implantation
For deep diffusion (>1µm), implantation is used to
introduce a certain dose, and thermal diffusion is
used to drive in the dopants.
The resulting profile after diffusion can be
determined by:
C08- 23Virginia Tech
Ion Implantation
A boron implantation is to be performed through a 50nm oxide so that the peak concentration is at the Si-SiO2 interface. The implant dose in silicon is to be
1013/cm2. What are the energy of the implant and the peak concentration at the interface?
– Peak at Si-oxide interface RP = 0.05µm Energy = 15keV (RP=0.023µm)
– Implanted dose in silicon = 1013 Q=2x1013 NP = Q/2.5RP = 3.5x1018/cm3
How thick should the oxide layer be to mask the implant if the background concentration is 1016/cm3?
– Xox = 0.05 + 0.023(2 ln(10 x 3.5 x 1018/1016))0.5 = 0.14µm
If the oxide layer is 50nm, how much photoresist is required on top of the oxide to completely mask the implant?
– PR thickness = 1.8 x (oxide thickness) = 1.8 x (0.14 – 0.05) = 0.16µm