PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for...

17
PISA 2015 Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría London, UK 6 December 2016

Transcript of PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for...

Page 1: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

PISA 2015Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education

Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

OECD Secretary-General Angel GurríaLondon, UK

6 December 2016

Page 2: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

We live in an age of unprecedented science innovation, but science

education isn’t keeping up.

Science

Page 3: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Student expectations of a science-related career, 2006 and 2015

Mont

eneg

roUn

ited

King

dom

Israe

lCr

oatia

Mexi

coAu

stria

Norw

ayTu

rkey

Esto

nia

Aust

ralia

Unite

d St

ates

Rom

ania

Maca

o (C

hina

)Jo

rdan

Braz

ilRu

ssia

Hong

Kon

g (C

h...

Lithu

ania

Japa

nNe

w Ze

alan

dSp

ain

Latv

iaCa

nada

Slov

enia

Bulg

aria

Hung

ary

Swed

enGr

eece

Finla

ndSw

itzer

land

OECD

ave

rage

-35

Irela

ndTu

nisia

Chile

Fran

ceCz

ech

Repu

blic

Neth

erla

nds

Kore

aSl

ovak

Rep

ublic

Germ

any

Icela

ndLu

xem

bour

gBe

lgiu

mUr

ugua

yCh

ines

e Ta

ipei

Denm

ark

Italy

Colo

mbi

aPo

land

Portu

gal

Indo

nesia

Thai

land

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2015-NS Students in 2006 who expect to work in science

%

Page 4: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Geor

gia

Alba

nia

Mold

ova

Portu

gal

Sing

apor

eRo

man

iaBu

lgar

iaRu

ssia

Japa

nBr

azil

Esto

nia

Malta

Italy

Mexi

coTu

rkey

Urug

uay

Chin

ese

Taip

eiTu

nisia

Irela

ndUn

ited

King

dom

Germ

any

Switz

erla

ndBe

lgiu

mVi

et N

amJo

rdan

Aust

riaHo

ng K

ong

(Chi

na)

Aust

ralia

Cost

a Ri

caIce

land

Slov

ak R

epub

licUn

ited

Arab

Em

irate

s

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

Average three-year trend in science across PISA assessments

Scor

e-po

int d

iffer

ence

Average three-year trend in science performance since 2006

(51)

Page 5: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Spending per student from the age of 6 to 15 and science performance

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Hungary

Costa Rica

Chinese Taipei

Chile

Brazil

TurkeyUruguayBulgaria

MexicoThailandMontenegro

Colombia

Dominican Republic

PeruGeorgia

Luxembourg

SwitzerlandNorwayAustria

Singapore

United States

United Kingdom

Malta

Sweden

BelgiumIceland

DenmarkFinland NetherlandsCanada

Japan

Slovenia

AustraliaGermany

IrelandFranceItaly

PortugalNew Zealand

Korea

SpainPoland

Israel

Estonia

Czech Rep.Latvia

Slovak Rep.

RussiaCroatiaLithuania

R² = 0.363584735029022

R² = 0.0354531836854977

Average spending per student from the age of 6 to 15 (in thousands USD, PPP)

Scie

nce

perf

orm

ance

(sc

ore

poin

ts)

Page 6: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Mean science performance

410

430

450

470

490

510

530

550

SingaporeJapan EstoniaChinese Taipei FinlandMacao (China)

CanadaViet NamHong Kong (China)B-S-J-G (China)KoreaNew ZealandSloveniaAustralia United KingdomGermany

NetherlandsIreland BelgiumDenmark Poland

Portugal NorwayUnited StatesAustria FranceSweden Czech RepublicSpain

LatviaRussia

LuxembourgItalyHungary LithuaniaCroatiaCABA (Argentina)

IcelandIsrael

MaltaSlovak Republic

Greece

ChileBulgaria

United Arab EmiratesRomaniaUruguay

MoldovaAlbaniaTurkey

Trinidad and Tobago ThailandCosta RicaQatar ColombiaMexico

GeorgiaMontenegro

Mean score

10 countries perform below this line…

Page 7: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Percentage of low-achievers in scienceVi

et N

amEs

toni

aSi

ngap

ore

Cana

daCh

ines

e Ta

ipei

Slov

enia

Denm

ark

Pola

ndLa

tvia

Unite

d Ki

ngdo

mAu

stra

liaSp

ain

Neth

erla

nds

Belg

ium

Czec

h Re

publ

icOE

CD a

vera

ge-3

5Fr

ance

Italy

Lithu

ania

Luxe

mbo

urg

Slov

ak R

epub

licMa

ltaCh

ileRo

man

iaAl

bani

aMo

ldov

aTr

inid

ad a

nd T

obag

oTh

aila

ndCo

lom

bia

Qata

rMo

nten

egro

Braz

ilLe

bano

nTu

nisia

Alge

ria

0102030405060708090

Percentage of students below proficiency level 2%

Page 8: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Singapore’s 15-year-olds are above the OECD average in each science category

Sing

apor

e

OECD

ave

rage

350

400

450

500

550

600

556

493

553

493

560

493

556

493

Mean performance in science (overall science scale)

Explain phenomena scientifically

Evaluate and design scientific enquiry Interpret data and evidence scientificallyScore points

Page 9: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

The last decade has seen an

improvement in education equity.

Equity

Page 10: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Across OECD countries, disadvantaged students are almost 3 times more likely to be low

performers in science

Dom

inica

n Re

publ

icPe

ruFr

ance

B-S-

J-G (C

hina

)Ch

ileBe

lgiu

mSl

ovak

Rep

ublic

Switz

erla

ndNe

w Ze

alan

dAu

stria

Portu

gal

Aust

ralia

Urug

uay

Malta

Gree

ceLe

bano

nSl

oven

iaIta

lyFin

land

Neth

erla

nds

Braz

ilLit

huan

iaQa

tar

Denm

ark

Indo

nesia

Norw

ayUn

ited

Arab

Em

irate

sRu

ssia

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Viet

Nam

Esto

nia

Latv

iaKo

sovo

Thai

land

Alge

ria

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Increased likelihood of students in the bottom quarter of ESCS scoring below Level 2 in science, relative to non-disadvantaged students (3 other quarters of ESCS1)

Odds ratio

Page 11: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Disadvantaged students ─ resilienceVi

et N

amHo

ng K

ong

(Chi

na)

Japa

nCh

ines

e Ta

ipei

Finla

ndSp

ain

Portu

gal

Latv

iaPo

land

Aust

ralia

Neth

erla

nds

Irela

ndSw

itzer

land

Belg

ium

Italy

Aust

riaCz

ech

Repu

blic

Croa

tiaTu

rkey

Luxe

mbo

urg

Thai

land

Slov

ak R

epub

licIsr

ael

Chile

Bulg

aria

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Colo

mbi

aIn

done

siaBr

azil

Unite

d Ar

ab E

mira

tes

Geor

gia

Leba

non

Tuni

sia Peru

Dom

inica

n Re

publ

ic0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Percentage of resilient students%

Resilient students come from the bottom 25% of the ESCS index within their country/econ-omy and perform among the top 25% across all countries/economies, after accounting for socioeconomic status

Page 12: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Percentage of low performers in science, by immigrant background

Esto

nia

Hong

Kon

g (C

hina

)Ca

nada

Sing

apor

eMa

cao

(Chi

na)

Switz

erla

ndGe

rman

yDe

nmar

kSl

oven

iaIre

land

Belg

ium

New

Zeal

and

Unite

d Ki

ngdo

mAu

stria

Neth

erla

nds

Norw

aySp

ain

Luxe

mbo

urg

Aust

ralia

Swed

enPo

rtuga

lUn

ited

Stat

esRu

ssia

Fran

ceCA

BA (A

rgen

tina)

OECD

ave

rage

Italy

Croa

tiaIsr

ael

Gree

ceCo

sta

Rica

Jord

anUn

ited

Arab

Em

irate

sQa

tar0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Non-immigrant students Second-generation immigrant students First-generation immigrant students

Perc

enta

ge o

f low

per

form

ers

(bel

ow p

rofic

ienc

y Le

vel 2

)

Only countries where the immigrant student population >6.25% are shown

Page 13: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Students with an immigrant background ─ resilience

Hong

Kon

g (C

hina

)Ma

cao

(Chi

na)

Esto

nia

Sing

apor

eSp

ain

Portu

gal

Cana

daSw

itzer

land

Unite

d Ki

ngdo

mGe

rman

ySl

oven

iaAu

stra

liaNe

ther

land

sNe

w Ze

alan

dAu

stria

Belg

ium

OECD

ave

rage

Denm

ark

Norw

ayUn

ited

Stat

esIre

land

Swed

enFr

ance

Italy

Russ

iaCr

oatia

Luxe

mbo

urg

Gree

ceCA

BA (A

rgen

tina)

Israe

lCo

sta

Rica

Jord

anUn

ited

Arab

Em

irate

sQa

tar0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Non-immigrant students Immigrant students%

Only countries where the immigrant student population

>6.25% are shown

Resilient students come from the bottom 25% of the ESCS index within their country/economy and perform

among the top 25% across all countries/economies, after taking socioeconomic status into account

Page 14: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Turk

eyVi

et N

amTu

nisia

Chin

ese

Taip

eiGr

eece

Czec

h Re

publ

icEs

toni

aFr

ance

CABA

(Arg

entin

a)Me

xico

Indo

nesia

Swed

enMa

ltaLa

tvia

B-S-

J-G (C

hina

)Sl

oven

iaUn

ited

King

dom

Norw

ayCr

oatia

Peru

Cost

a Ri

caCh

ileKo

rea

Cana

daIre

land

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Germ

any

Leba

non

Pola

ndUn

ited

Arab

Em

irate

s

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

After accounting for socio-economic status

Scor

e-po

int d

iffer

ence

Public and private schools, and students’ science performance

Students in private schools perform better

Students in public schools perform better

Page 15: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

The difference is not how good they are at

science but in their attitudes to science.

 

Gender

Page 16: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Dom

inica

n Re

publ

icAl

geria

Indo

nesiaPeru

Mexi

coAl

bani

aTh

aila

ndMo

nten

egro

Mold

ova

Braz

ilTr

inid

ad a

nd T

obag

oUr

ugua

yGr

eece

Unite

d Ar

ab E

mira

tes

CABA

(Arg

entin

a)Sl

ovak

Rep

ublic

Russ

iaHu

ngar

ySp

ain

Malta

Hong

Kon

g (C

hina

)Vi

et N

amPo

land

Czec

h Re

publ

icFr

ance

Portu

gal

Maca

o (C

hina

)Sl

oven

iaSw

itzer

land

Kore

aAu

stra

liaFin

land

New

Zeal

and

B-S-

J-G (C

hina

)Ja

pan0

5

10

15

20

25

30Boys Girls%

Gender differences among top performers in science

Page 17: PISA 2015 - Volume I: Excellence and Equity in Education and Volume II: Policies and Practices for Successful Schools

Expectations of a science career, boys and girls (OECD average)

...science and engineering professionals

...health professionals

...information and communication technology (ICT) professionals

...science-related technicians or as-sociate professionals

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Boys Girls

%

Students who expect to work as...