Pilot Smart Mapping Documentation

Pilot SMART Mapping Workshop

1 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 2 O c c u p a t i o n a l S a f e t y a n d H e a l t h C e n t e r , D O L E , N o r t h A v e n u e , A g h a m R o a d , Q u e z o n C i t y

Catalyzing New Mobility in Cities: The Case of Metro Manila

Catalyzing New Mobility in Cities: The Case of Metro Manila Pilot SMART Mapping Workshop 1 February 2012 Occupational Safety and Health Center, DOLE, North Avenue, Agham Road Quezon City, Philippines

i

Table of Contents Executive Summary

I. Opening Program

A. Welcome Remarks by Dean Antonio La Viña, ASoG

II. Introduction of the participants

III. SMART Mapping Overview

IV. Walking Tour of Quezon City North Central Business District: Trinoma – SM

North Area

V. SMART Mapping Workshop Process Briefing

VI. Mapping Workshop and Group Presentations

VII. Synthesis and Next Steps Forward

VIII. Annexes

A. List of participants for Pilot SMART Mapping Workshop

B. SMART Mapping Workshop Guide

C. Transcript of Note Takers

D. Summary of Group Outputs

E. Photo Documentation

F. Certificate of Completion

Executive Summary This pilot mapping workshop on Catalyzing New Mobility in Cities is a half-day activity co-organized with the University of Michigan-SMART Centre held last 1 February 2012 at the Occupational Safety and Health Center, DOLE, North Avenue, Agham Road, Quezon City. It was attended by various 38 individuals from 25 private organizations, government and academic institutions, and individuals working on transportation in Metro Manila namely ASEAN GTZ Clean Air for Small Cities Project, CAI-ASIA, OSHC DOLE, Ayala Land Inc., Parasatabi, The Nature Group, NEDA, OpenStreetMap Philippines, Philippine Science High School, ASCENT, Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC), Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Barangay South Triangle, Palafox Associates, Entrepreneur Society of the Philippines, League of Cities of the Philippines, INNOVENSY, GTVSP Philippines. With support from the Rockefeller Foundation, this undertaking was organized by the Innovations at the Base of the Pyramid in Southeast Asia (iBoP Asia) Program of the Ateneo School of Government in partnership with SMART Center of the University of Michigan. Following a new mobility forum the previous day, the New Mobility mapping workshop’s primary objectives were: 1) reveal existing and potential transport mobility grid including informal hubs and other uncharted transport system features; 2) provide stakeholders an opportunity to work together in accelerating and advancing implementation of sustainable, connected, inclusive transport and generating and sharing related information, and policy initiatives; and 3) build on and further extend the shareable knowledge base of inclusive mobility-enhancing features of the informal transport system. The mapping exercise was deemed necessary because of the existing complex and diverse transportation modes in Metro Manila. In addition, the growing number of unaccounted public transport terminals and hubs hinders the walkability and sometimes obstruct the flow of transport. The country lacks readily available and accessible information where they are. LGUs and other government agencies lack capability to produce up-to-date map and mapping requires much time and resources. In this exercise, Ms. Susan Zielinski, Managing Director of SMART, explained that the participants would reveal the existing New Mobility Grid of the Quezon City North business district area. The grid they would come up with will be very useful, customized and special to everyone. This process allowed them to see what they got, what they are working with and together come up with collective solutions. Regarded not just a brainstorming activity, two possible outcomes were expected from this exercise: one was to share this experience to others and second use the map as a tool. The participants were divided into 4 groups and during the workshop proper, the following were some of the things observed in terms of group dynamics, group process, strengths and weaknesses:

Group members were actively engaged and attentive to one another. The groups had a great mix of technical and creative minds in the presence of

planners, researchers, entrepreneurs, IT specialists, policy makers, private sector representatives, writers and concerned citizens. The variety of experiences from each member provided very vast information and details on each map.

Each group member had a story to share. The entire exercise was based on not only the things they saw or observed during the walking tour but it also consisted of their own experience while commuting or traversing the metro.

Some of their innovative ideas were based on their positive personal experiences in other cities that they wanted to replicate.

The good thing about this exercise was the creative juices kept flowing and it probed each participant to raise queries especially at times when they feel like an idea will be challenging or if they have a different opinion. There were a number of healthy arguments that made the groups active.

Some of the common themes that came out during the plenary presentations were: Bike lanes, single ticketing, commuter friendly stuff, walkways, improve communication, and need of better signage. In general, the participants found the mapping workshop very useful and they learned a lot from it. Their main concern was how to make the map more accessible to target users. The participants are envisaged to eventually form a more permanent group, like an e-forum that tackles the issue on mobility. They acknowledge current government initiatives, but they prefer a more visionary approach rather than solution finding. They all have high hopes for new mobility in Metro Manila and so the workshop ended on a high note.

Catalyzing New Mobility in Cities: The Case of Metro Manila Pilot SMART Mapping Workshop

1 February 2012

1

I. Welcome Remarks Dr. Antonio La Viña, Dean, Ateneo School of Government

The Pilot Mapping Workshop of Catalyzing New

Mobility in Cities in Metro Manila co-organized by ASoG with University of Michigan-SMART Centerheld at the Occupational Safety and Health Center of DOLE in North Avenue corner Agham Road, Quezon City started at around 9:00 a.m. with Ms. Cddyqa Rogel leading the Invocation and National Anthem. She welcomed the various participants in the event. She then called Dean La Viña to give the welcome remarks.

Dean La Viña thanked her and greeted the

participants a pleasant morning. He said that the project launch the day before was heightened by the quality of participation. Aside from technical research activities with an overall objective of a better city, it is time to catalyze a coalition of individuals and organizations that advocates and push for a more livable city. He shared that every time he meets Chairman Tolentino, the good Chair always speak out that the agency automatically gets sued once they take action because of the nature of the law that created MMDA. Dean La Viña personally noted the he was almost sure that MMDA would get sued in the unified ticketing system being proposes. He also shared that Chairman Tolentino also said that when they get sued no one is behind them, and that there is no citizen organization to back them up. This does not go for MMDA only but also for other government institutions and LGUs who begin to think of innovative things being implement. Therefore, he called for everyone to catalyze and organize their efforts to support good projects being implemented by government agencies like MMDA.

This activity is in line with that approach, where a group of individuals and

organizations from all parts and discipline could help, guide and also learn. He expressed his excitement to learn a new approach to mapping in transportation.

As to why the mapping exercise was done at the Occupational Safety and Health

Center, Dean La Viña said because it is an area where all could have a short walking tour of a central business district and discover possibilities in transportation. This activity would bring minds together to bring innovative solutions to problems that are centered to why transportation immobility is experienced in the metropolis. Other responsibilities hindered him to stay for the mapping activity but he wished everyone to have a fruitful time.

II. Introduction of Participants

Dr. Segundo Joaquin Romero, Director, iBoP Asia

Dr. Romero mentioned that this is already the fourth activity of the New Mobility project. They started with a forum in Ayala, followed by the inception meeting then the project launch yesterday. These are not unrelated events but they all lead to hopefully a more permanent


1 February 2012

2

group that will advocate for new mobility. He hopes that New Mobility could be one of the innovations of ASoG similar to how Transparency and Accountability (TAN), the biggest anti-corruption group in the Philippines, was formed. This could be New Mobility’s vision or goal especially since the people from yesterday’s project launch were pushing to have more discussion in new mobility. A huge map, as big as the billboards found in malls is being hoped at the end of the project. But before producing such, they should begin with this SMART approach in mapping exercise and in connecting the dots.

After which, he then asked each participant to introduce themselves by stating

their name, occupation and affiliation. (See Annex A for Attendance Sheets)

III. SMART Mapping Overview Ms. Susan Zielinski, Managing Director, SMART Centre University of Michigan

Numbers and words on new mobility were presented yesterday and they were

all great, but today Ms. Zielinski said the participants would be taking a different toll by going around the room and getting physical. With that she did a little exercise with the participants. She made them stand up and raise their right arm. Then asked them to put their left hand on their right wrist and move their left hand up to right arm. Next she asked them to raise their left arm, put their left hand on their right wrist and move left hand to right arm. What happened was, they all rolled up their sleeves which was what today’s mapping activity was about. The participants were encouraged to stand beside each other and interact. Each participant had colored dots on their nametag and the idea was to have as many colors per table as possible. The more they were next to someone they did not know was a great thing. They were given a workshop guide in case they got off track. (See Annex B)

In this exercise, Ms. Zielinski said that the participants would reveal the existing

New Mobility Grid of the area. The grid they would come up is expected to be very


1 February 2012

3

useful, customized and special to everyone. This process allowed them to see what they got, what they are working with and together come up with collective solutions. She informed the group that she had done similar mapping process to different communities and maps come out unique every time. She then reminded everyone the three things they were aiming for: connecting the dots, moving minds and moving money.

This exercise is not just a brainstorming activity. Two possible outcomes were

expected from this exercise, one was to share this experience to others and second use the map as a tool. Ms. Zielinski instructed the participants to take this mapping as a dry run and way of learning together in the process. The map could be made into something that would be useful by combining different things.

Maps were placed on each table and all materials were provided. This activity

aimed for knowledge, connectivity and implementation. In the walking tour, she asked the participants to think of the following guide questions: How things are connected to each other? How things might have economic or innovation opportunities? Describe the transformation of the sights in a new way? They should be able to tell a story.

Question from Benjie dela Peña: what are we looking for when we go out? What

are we paying attention to? Response from Susan: Looking at all the different modes of transportation, the

way information is given out, the juxtaposition, is it easy to get off and get in? How do people use the transportation and connectivity of the system? Economic opportunities and tell a new story about it. When is it going to be enhanced? What works, what doesn’t and what would you do better?


1 February 2012

4

IV. Walking Tour of QC North CBD: Trinoma-SM North Area

The participants walked along the sidewalk

of North Avenue, crossed the street using the overpass, passed through the North Avenue terminal station, crossed the pedestrian crossing area and back to the venue.

Aside from the formal transport terminal

found in SM North EDSA, there was also an informal transport terminal of pedicabs along the North Avenue road. The different modes of transport seen plying along the North Avenue

road were private vehicles, two-wheeled MVs, Public Utility Jeepneys (PUJs), Pedicabs, Taxi cabs, AUVs, Van shuttles going from one point to another, and the Metro Rail Transit (MRT) train. But despite this, it is interesting to observe a lot of people are seen walking along the road or crossing the road.

V. SMART Mapping Workshop Process Briefing

Ms. Susan Zielinski, Managing Director, SMART Centre University of Michigan

Ms. Zielinski reminded everyone that each table should have a good mix of colors representing different sectors and join people that they do not know. She said that enough tools and supplies were made available for each working group. The participants should not be constraint to only one plan and asked to feel free to take more tracing paper from the workshop team in case they needed more. Less tangible resources were also present at the participants’ disposal such as:

Group members Knowledge of some of the transport features of the selected focus map segment Some knowledge of what is connected


1 February 2012

5

Sense of humor and creativity Sense of civic duty/ passion for improvement

She then enumerated the

workshop tasks. First she instructed the group to find a note taker to take down crucial discussion points. The group should also select a reporter to present the group output at the end of the workshop. Everyone gets 12 minutes to present their output after 2 hours. A facilitator was also required but the discussion may start without it. Then she instructed each one to introduce themselves to their group mates by saying their name

followed by what they are hopeful about, something positive or what they love in Manila’s transportation.

The first step is revealing the new mobility grid. Look at the maps on their table and

identify connection points. Find places you can connect using small or big ideas (e.g. Signboards to understand the system or an application for iPhone).

Second is to identify the area where you can start working with your idea. Then

think about what economic benefits activities you can think of? How can you save money? How could you invent new businesses/ services/ innovation to connect the dots? What are the economic ideas that can create job, save money, invest in business?

Third is moving minds, where participants portrayed their project. How do you put

the signage up? How do you tell a story of the integrated system? It involves marketing, finding a way and helping people figure out how things are connected.

She instructed the note takers to tally at least five research questions needed in

order to serve the project. Note takers were also instructed to jot down policies that are needed to implement the innovation project. The groups were also asked to identify people that they believe should be at the table with them.

Then the groups will come back in plenary and report their outputs. They were

instructed that if they are stuck on one thing, they should try moving to another just to keep the flow going.

VI. Mapping Workshop

The room was divided into 4 groups. In the workshop proper, the following were some of the things observed in terms of group dynamics, group process, strengths and weaknesses: (See Annex C for transcript of note takers)


1 February 2012

6

Most groups were very active where the group members actively engaged and attentive to one another.

The activity was done with almost everyone from the group standing up and doing their share in mapping.

Most groups also used all the tools available for them but the most commonly used tool was the colored dots to represent various transport terminals. The groups assigned legends to describe what they saw during the walking tour.

The groups had a great mix of technical and creative minds in the presence of planners, researchers, writers and concerned citizens. The variety of experiences from each member provided very vast information and details on each map.

Each group member almost had a story to share. The entire exercise was based on not only the things they saw or observed during the walking tour but also consisted of their own experience while commuting or traversing the metro.

Some of their innovative ideas were based on their positive personal experiences in other cities that they wanted to replicate.

The good thing about this exercise was the creative juices kept flowing and it probed each participant to raise queries especially at times when they feel like an idea will be challenging or if they have a different opinion. There were a number of healthy arguments that made the groups active.

In each group, there was always one that stood out as a natural facilitator without having to volunteer or be chosen and this is usually someone who has technical knowledge on the various transport systems.

After lunch, each group was called to present to plenary what they have discussed.

(See Annex D for summary of the group outputs in order of presentation and Annex E for photos of actual group outputs)


1 February 2012

7

During plenary, everyone was intently listening to each other’s output. Ms. Zielinski said that this was the quietest group that she had handled. Common themes that came out from the presentations were: Bike lanes, single ticketing, commuter friendly stuff, walkways, improve communication, and need of better signage.

VII. Awarding of Certificates

Certificates were awarded to all who attended the workshop. The certificate, signed by Dean La Viña and Ms. Zielinski read (See Annex F):

SMART New Mobility Mapping and Implementation Seminar. <Name of Participant> has completed the University of Michigan SMART Program’s New Mobility Mapping and Implementation Seminar and has gained skills related to advancing and accelerating integrated and sustainable transportation systems in communities and regions.

VIII. Synthesis and Next Steps Forward Dr. Marie Danielle Guillen, Project Manager Finding New Mobility in Metro Manila

Dr. Guillen thanked everyone for participating and

encouraged all to be part of a catalyzing project. She was interested to see that people learned something new and inspired by their optimism. She posed finding new mobility as a challenge for all. That in order for Metro Manila to be livable, they need to help each other. The issue is not really competition but complementing and finding innovative ideas to improve the current situation.

The event ended at around 1:00 pm.

ANNEX A List of Participants

ANNEX B Pilot SMART Mapping Workshop Guide

CATALYZING NEW MOBILITY IN CITIES PROJECT

PILOT METRO MANILA SMARTMAPPING UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-SMART (Sustainable Mobility, Accessibility,

Research and Transformation) Centre with

Innovations at the Base of the Pyramid in Asia (iBoP Asia) Program ATENEO SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

WORKSHOP GUIDE

WELCOME to the Pilot Metro Manila SMART Mapping Workshop, a half-day

event that gives participants the opportunity to collaboratively improve

transportation in Metro Manila.

We do this specifically today by “revealing the existing New Mobility Grid”

generating hitherto unrecorded information about the location and

interconnectivity of transport facilities and features within a selected slice

of Metro Manila – the Quezon City North Central Business District (around

the Trinoma and SM North EDSA Area).

We are taking an approach developed by SMART at the University of

Michigan to identify, reveal and enhance the multi-modal/New Mobility

Grid in communities and regions around the world. The approach also

facilitates exploration of economic development, employment, and

innovation opportunity as well as approaches to marketing and

communicating about the enhanced system.

Today’s Pilot SMART Mapping demonstrates process which if, relevant and

applicable can be replicated in other areas of Metro Manila by other

stakeholders, the resulting maps of which can be consolidated with the

incremental database of sectional SMART Maps. At the same time, the

connectivity maps can be easily made into door-to-door transport maps for

users and distributed in print or online. This both provides a tool for users

for the short-term, and a tool for identifying future enhancements for the

long term.

Objectives of the Exercise In Brief

1. Reveal existing and potential transport connectivity grid including

informal hubs and other uncharted transport system features.

2. Provide stakeholders an opportunity to work together in

accelerating and advancing implementation of sustainable,

connected, inclusive transport and generating and sharing related

information, and policy initiatives

3. Build on and further extend the shareable knowledge base of

inclusive mobility-enhancing features of the informal transport

system

AVAILABLE TOOLS

Mapping Tools and Supplies

The following workshop tools and supplies are available for each workshop

group:

1. An easel or flipchart for documenting discussions

2. Tracing paper for providing information without marking the base

focus map (to increase its reusability).

3. Round colored sticker dots (0.5 inch and 0.25 inch in diameter in

red, blue, green, purple, orange, yellow, and white colors)

4. Color markers for labeling added map features onto post-it notes

5. Post-it notes

6. Masking Tape for general use

7. Scissors for general use

8. Magnifying glass for general use

Less tangible Resources You have at Your Disposal

1. Diverse colleagues/group members

2. Knowledge of some of the transport features of the selected focus

map segment

3. Some knowledge of what is connected

4. Sense of humour and creativity

5. Sense of civic duty/passion for improvement

Finding Your Group (as you Find NeMo)

You will be in one of four workshop groups. Look at the colour of your name

tag dot. It tells whether you represent government, and NGO, big business,

a small venture, or academe. Please make sure that in your group every

colour is represented. Please also favour group in which you know the least

number of people.

Getting Started

*First, please identify a rapporteur to take notes. * Next, please identify a volunteer to report back to the larger group. * Next, please identify, a group chair or facilitator to organize and steer the work of the group according to the steps below.

Workshop Tasks:

1. Reveal your new mobility grid. Using your focus map, use the red

dot stickers to identify the New Mobility Grid by marking as many

connection points as possible between two or more modes and

services.

2. Identify implementation opportunities. Using your revealed grid,

identify immediate, short-term, and long term opportunities for

enhancing the grid.

3. Identify opportunities for “moving money” (economic benefit).

Using your revealed grid, identify economic benefits and

opportunities specific to your grid including creating jobs, saving

money, boosting business (new innovations, new markets), and

revitalizing local economies.

4. Identify opportunities for “moving minds”. Identify at least three

key strategies for “moving minds” of both users and decision-

makers.

5. Raise queries to enhance grid. Identify at least 5 research questions

or areas of knowledge or data pursuit that will help you enhance

your New Mobility Grid.

6. Shape policy. Identify policies that will remove barriers to (or

provide incentives to) integrated innovation and implementation.

Note that they don’t all have to be transportation policies. They

may be policies relating to land use, energy, economic and finance,

information and communications, innovation, social, tourism, and

other policies.

Workshop Output Presentation

1. Each group will be given 10-12 minutes to report on the results of

their performance on the six tasks.

2. In plenary, the groups identify

Common Themes across the 4 tables

Common Ground across the 4 tables

Points of innovation and variation across the 4 tables

Next Steps

The workshop working in plenary identify the following:

Strategy for more SMART Mapping

Strategy for organizing for implementing identified initiatives

ANNEX C Transcript of Note Takers

Annex C Transcript of Note Takers

1

GROUP NO.

MEMBERS NOTES

ONE Ronald Cartagena Third Espero Tieza Santos Bert Suansing Buddy Tan Art Cacdac

Legend Blue – challenge spots Yellow – infrastructure/ facility Pink – information/ billboards Orange – economic development Green line - employment opportunity Fuchsia – housing Green rectangle – major transportation terminal

TWO Dinna Dayaw Daniel Ngilay Jay-R Cordova Cristy Llacer-Oreta Elisa Del Rosario Glynda Bathan Kimleye Ng

Who should be at the table? MMDA Chairman Tolentino DPWH Secretary Singson Persons with disabilities QC Mayor Herbert Bautista Bus operators COSE elderly Department of Public Order and Safety of QC SM and Trinoma Mall Managers TODA Barangay officials JODA Cycling advocates and entrepreneurs

Quezon Avenue Connectivity

Bus stop before and after flyover, for Metro Manila buses MRT Quezon Avenue Centris jeepney and taxi terminal, AUV for provincial trips


2

Q. Avenue jeepney stops Provincial bus stop under Q. Avenue flyover Tricycle line, Panay Avenue Taxi line (informal) near MRT Q. Avenue Central terminal, EDSA

Legend

Purple dot – formal modes of transport/ terminals Purple rectangle – informal modes of transport/ terminals Yellow dot – business models Orange line – bicycle lanes Blue line – overhead pedestrians Black line – informal pedestrians

Research questions

Are there policies regulating pedicabs? How are they to be located? How do you ease the congestion of jeepneys lining up along streets occupying some of the

pathways? o How do you make drivers more productive during non-peak hours? o How do they get formal terminals?

How do you establish formal terminals? What are the necessary permits needed? Study n the “Bandera System”, a monitoring and regulatory mechanism among organized

jeepney and tricycle groups. What are its features that can be replicated to be used in formal organizations?

Business Models

Charging stations in terminals Establish cooperatives for financing


3

Livelihood activities for organized groups of drivers Bike parking, shower and locker Greening the roads like nurseries and gardeners, landscapers

Facilities:

Protected bicycle lanes along major roads Covered walkways and overpasses

Policy

Establish color coding of tricycles and pedicabs by their routes and destinations Unified ticketing system for the trains Regulations regarding pedicab routes and design pedestrian friendly crossings at street levels Traffic calming: traffic signals) timed for cars and pedestrians

Creative

Flash mobbing to model desired behavior, like falling in line, obeying traffic rules THREE Doc Jun Castro

Nordy Pimentel Marty Abuzo Michelle Ann Santillan Caroline Mendoza Rosemarie Pariñas

Something Positive "ONE STOP AREA"

o hospital, school, shopping mall, work opportunities, hotel, etc. Available spaces for future development expansion Intermodal transfer area

o jeep, MRT, bus, UV Express, tricycle Policy/Project we can do right away

Central Bus Terminal --- maximize its use Unified vendor stalls similar to Makati (Jupiter St. area)

o small booth for vendors, create economic activity (e.g. food deliveries, loading center), assign to them the cleanliness of the area and


4

minimization of trash Park n' Bike

o be bicycle friendly o to be located at MRT, shopping malls, offices, etc. o bike lanes connecting QC Circle, malls, major stations

Provide info maps and signage o important locations, contact numbers, etc.

Integration of terminals (FX, Jeep, Tricycle)

Research Questions Public Transport Terminal (one place to another)

o Trip characteristics o Users, user's needs o Trip chain o Modes o Trip fare o Trip purpose

Bike lanes o Feasibility o Background of transport users

Policies

No politicking ---- Political will Coordination of Public/Private stakeholders thru Private Public Partnership

Who should be at the table?

Government group Business group


5

Public Utility Vehicle operators (Jeep, Tricycle, Pedicab, FX, Taxi, Bus) FOUR Gabriel Catapang

Hailey Meriel Rally de Leon Elma Arboleras Dexter Cardenas Cholo Asis Benjamin Dela Peña Andre Quintos

Suggestions Color code for vehicles (PUVs)

o Labeling Route labels for jeepneys, bus (same with trains/ subways)

o Visible (way finding) Data map of routs (start- end) Road network for pedicabs Additional walk bridge (Mcdo/ Trinoms) Uniform sidewalk specifications Less stops (unloading/ loading)

o One bus (BRT) Like a light rail transit Prevents loading/ unloading practices in the middle of the road

Positive

SM/ Trinoma transport terminals o Multi-modal hubs

MRT 7 – Commonwealth/ Fairview o Via North Avenue

Pedicab stop (near OSHC) Two main malls – employment hub MRT 3 – North Avenue Station Food stalls in transport terminal Construction

o Economic activity o Employment (local)

Mix of institutions: schools, malls, hospitals


6

Partnership (e.g. malls) in terms of establishment of facilities: walkways, terminals Connectivity

Organized route map Business opportunity

Single ticketing system (central) o Chip/ MRT style o Tap to pay concept

Marketing

Route map (available/ customizable) o Attractions

Payment from advertisers e.g. malls, parks Policy/ research

LTFRB- assignment of codes/ per route Frequency/ traffic projections Travel time

ANNEX D Summary of Group Outputs

Annex D Summary of Group Outputs

1

GROUPS IDEAS/ LEGENDS BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

FACILITIES POLICIES RESEARCH QUESTIONS

WHO SHOULD BE SITTING

HERE? The Mobilizers Presented by Dinna Dayaw

Learned a lot of new things about what was available and what was not

Drew a wish list of things they wished to see

LRT users are more disciplined to line up. Flash mobbing – carry a certain behavior at a certain time, which appears as a normal behavior. Can be used in cycling.

Legend: o Purple dots:

formal modes of transport and terminals

o Purple rectangles: informal

o Orange lines: bicycle lanes. They almost placed it everywhere imagining

Bike stations located very near train stations that have lockers and showers.

Charging stations (phone, electronic gadgets)

Livelihood activities and organizing group of drivers of TODA and JODA. Pedicab drivers can do the same things. Coop benefits, micro business opportunities and health, learn skills of vehicle maintenance, micro lending

Greening the roads for landscapers and gardeners. Little nurseries to be maintained by the nearby communities

Protected bike lanes

Covered walkways and overpasses. Senior citizen friendly. Currently, overpass is not covered, dark at night and vendors occupy space.

Color-coding scheme for tricycles and pedicabs to know which grounds or area they cover. Make sure that all areas will be sufficiently covered

Unified ticketing system for trains. Connect or close the loop. One ticket system for all three lines.

Pedicabs supposed to obey traffic rules and design

Allow pedestrian friendly crossing at

How do you ease congestion of PUJs along streets? Often occupying a lane

How do you make drivers more productive during non-peak hours? Can they be taught other skills and businesses?

How do they get formal terminals? Possibly asking veterans memorial to give or lend space to jeepney terminal

How do you establish formal terminals in the first place? Who do you talk to?

DPWH head Singson

PWDs Mayor of QC,

Herbert Bautista

MMDA Chair Tolentino

Bus operators Coalition of

services for the elderly

SM and Trinoma, Mall Managers

Dept of Public Order and Safety of QC

Barangay officials

Different drivers associations

Cycling advocates and entrepreneurs


2




HERE? protected bike lanes

o Yellow dots: business models

o Blue lines: pedestrians walkways above the streets

o Black lines: informal or non-existent pedestrian walkways

street level from North Ave station all along EDSA. Not everyone can go up the steps. Putting traffic signals on EDSA.

What facilities are required? Permits?

Use of bandera system, monitoring and regulatory mechanisms. What are its feautres that can be replicated and use in formal orgs?

Presented by Tieza Santos and Bert Suansing

Color coded based on thematic issues

Several opportunities designed does not suit metro manila which we can turn around

Blue: challenged spots, major transport spots that are not connected but can be improved to help

Formalize and replicate Informal transport modes such as pedicabs not registered by providing transport services to people and door-to-door service. Make it more formal and more efficient mobility structure

Develop north triangle. Incorporate

If there is a way to translate into a more useful public information, then that is one way of educating people and pedestrian

Corner of Mindanao Ave and North


3




HERE? improve mobility of people

Yellow: facilities that can either help of facilitate. Recurring in areas where there are major transportation hubs

Pink: information and education materials. Irony is that public information materials have huge discrepancy in design and location.

Orange: economic areas/ commercial areas/ economic development/ enterprise opportunities.

Green: major employment opportunities that surround economic centers

Fuchsia (rectangle): major residential

a dwelling place for the people settling there, dormitory type.

Golf course: Veteran’s

Ave, pedxing for PWDs

Turn Agham road into a pedestrian way


4




HERE? areas. To see how far they are to areas where they need to access goods and services

Green (rectangle): major transportation terminals

Green lines: major employment opportunities

Presented by Marty Abuzo

Blue dots: Attraction Transport and people go Formal and informal transport terminals

Lessen informal terminals by centralizing them from one place to another

Place small uniform stalls similar to the kiosks in Makati

Recycle bins to be placed near these stalls

One stop area: schools, hospital, park, shopping centers, intermodal transport terminals can be found. There

Bikelines to connect existing bike lanes. Connected to malls and major roads.

Zero waste program

Apolitical policies

Public private partnership

What mode of transport do the passengers use everyday?

Purpose of travelling?

Travel cost? Travelling

time incurred everyday?

Business groups

Transport operators


5




HERE? is still space for improvement and development

Presented by Andre Quintos

Positive things in the area mapped o SM trinoma

multi-modal transport provides a lotof choices

o Pedicab stop o Two main

malls o Food stalls o Mixed of

institutions present: schools, malls etc.

Route map should be made publicly available paid for by a mall or private establishment. Map that will highlight certain attractions.

Information kiosk for commuters

Map posted in terminal to identify which public transport to use from point to point

Additional walkbridge from McDo to Trinoma

Give codes to buses to easily identify their route

Establish road network for pedicabs

Uniform sidewalk specifications

Less stops for unloading and loading. BRT.

LTFRB to establish color coded routes for every type of transportation

Single ticketing system using chip or MRT style

How to help people navigate the area?

Frequency and traffic projections and travel time from one area to another?

ANNEX E Photo Documentation

Annex E Photo Documentation

1


2


3


4


5


6


7

ANNEX F Certificate of Completion

Certificate of Completion

SMART New Mobility Mapping and Implementation Seminar

has completed the University of Michigan SMART Program’s New Mobility Mapping and Implementation Seminar

and has gained skills related to advancing and accelerating integrated and sustainable transportation systems in

communities and regions.

On this ______ day of ______ in _______.

Susan Zielinski Segundo Romero Managing Director, SMART Director, iBoP Asia University of Michigan Ateneo School of Government

Pilot Smart Mapping Documentation

Business

Transcript of Pilot Smart Mapping Documentation