Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard
-
Upload
thomas-blomqvist -
Category
Documents
-
view
144 -
download
0
Transcript of Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard
![Page 1: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The purpose of this presentation is to:
• Define the issues. • Conclude on strategic options and their
barriers to success.• Recommendation.
![Page 2: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Todays presentation adresses 3 questions:
Which are thestrategic issues?
Which strategicoption should
be prioritized?What is the
recommendation?
![Page 3: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PRG should strive for a position among the top 3 players in the market!
• Importent to frame the problem in order to identify the strategic issues.
• Cornerstones in Company vision- Building strong brand positions- Presence in all Scandinavian countries- Inspiring every day
• Problem definition:What can be done in a 3-year period in order to achieve a position among the top 3 players in the market, and a EBITA margin of minimum 15%?
![Page 4: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Players applying the generic strategy Low cost & Wide Scope are the winners!
Low priced fashion retail, KSFs• Fast product turnaround• Flexibility in production• Speed to market• Only PL.• High volume/low cost• Own stores/franchise• Scale• Low priced fashion
Performance• High profitability level• Strong sales growth• Increased market shares• New store openings• High stock turnover
![Page 5: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Players applying the generic strategy Low cost & Wide Scope are the winners!
Low priced grocery retail, KSFs• High volumes• Low cost• Low price points• Buying power• Own stores• Operational efficiency
Performance• Significant growth in
market shares.• Strong sales growth.
![Page 6: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PRG apply the generic strategy Wide Scope/Differentiation
Low/Medium priced suppliers, KSFs
• The service concept• Distribution level &
sales channel.• Innovation• Strong brand• Heavy investments in
media.
Performance• High Profitability• Strong CAGR• High Distribution level• Successfull innovations• High share of voice
![Page 7: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Suppliers in Denmark are struggeling
Low priced suppliers,performance• Negative CAGR.• Declining profitability.
High priced suppliers,performance• High Profitability level• Negative CAGR• High brand awareness• Declining market shares
![Page 8: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Matching O & T with S & W defines possible issues • Copy/Paste sales concept. SO• Consider Acquisitions.• Multi sales channel strategy, but
different offerings in each channel.
• Adjust sales concept & STadd new value adding activities.
• Establish Danish subsidiary• Offer different price levels that
meets custome demands.
Overcome weaknessess and WTthreats by: • Consider Acquisitions.• Consider Joint Ventures.• Do not enter Denamark.
• Consider Acquisitions. WO• Offer the service concept to the
grocery trade in DK.• Consider wholesale of product
concept that adds value.• Apply Multiple sales channel
strategy, but not the grocery.
![Page 9: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Prioritizing the issues by matching them with the problem definition• Copy/Paste sales concept. SO• Consider Acquisitions.
• Consider Acquisitions. WO
• Adjust sales concept and STadd new value adding activities.
Overcome weaknessess and WTthreats by: • Consider Acquisitions.• Consider Joint Ventures.
![Page 10: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ConclusionWhich are the strategic issues?
Conclusion:3 Strategic options
1. Enter DK on its own.2. Enter DK by acquisition.
3. Enter DK by a JV.
Which strategicoption should
be prioritized?What is the
recommendation?
![Page 11: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Hypotheses 1To reach the target on its own, the company needs initiatives that at least enable a turnover of approx. $30 million in year 3.
• KSFs of PRG + external opportunities (market growth and size) - Grocery channel best alternative.
• Full market entry required, i.e. preferred supplier to all the major chains. 63% av the total accessible market is needed in order to reach the target.
• To become preferred partner, PRG need to add more/different values than competitors.
![Page 12: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusion - Hypotheses 1PRG would probably not be able to enter DK on its own. The barriers to success are high.
• PRG neither have the knowledge of the market, nor any relations with key customers.
• This entry strategy is dependent on agreements with all major customers, i.e. no/few agreements – no entry.
• If only some product concepts would be listed in each chain, i.e. entering with a broad scope/nische strategy, would significantly reduce the possibilities to build a strong brand.
![Page 13: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hypotheses 2PRG can reach the targeted position in Denmark by an acquisition.
• The targeted position, top 3, can be reached by aquiring either Jbs, Hb Textil, Triumph or SOS Distribution (Bjorn Borg).Main barriers to success.
• The willingness to sell is crucial.• Important the achieve synergies in order to reach the target.• The evaluation of the company might differ between the
parties.• The culture in Jbs might not fit with the culture of PRG.• The core competencies, and resources that are available to
make the acquisition work, could cause problems.
![Page 14: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusion Hypotheses 2PRG would be able to achieve the target by an acquisition of Jbs, or Hb Textil.
• Jbs offers the best strategic fit, and are close to the required level of profitability.
![Page 15: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hypotheses 3PRG can reach the targeted position in Denmark by entering a joint venture.
• A joint venture with Jbs, HB Textil or Triumph could solve the problem.
Triumph winAdd. product categories.Increased sales byentering grocery channel.Lower costPRG winAccess wide distribution& to new channels.Increased Know-How.Low risk
HB Textil winSuppl. price segments.Higher sales & lower costMore attractive supplier.Increased profitability.PRG winRelations key customers.Access to grocery channelAssortment suppl. Thelow priced of Hb Textil.Lower cost/Less risk.
Jbs winNew prod. categories +prod. for ladies/childr.Opport. to expand toother countriesPRG winRelations key customersSupplementing assort.Opportunities in No, SweAccess to channels.Lower cost, less risk.
![Page 16: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusion Hypotheses 3PRG would be able reach the targeted position in Denmark by entering a joint venture with either Jbs, or HB Textil.
• Despite the Barriers to success- process of partnering with other business can be complex.- It might reduce focus from core business in Swe, No.- Different objectives and cultures in each company might cause problems.
![Page 17: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Conclusion Hypotheses 3PRG would be able reach the targeted position in Denmark by entering a joint venture with either Jbs, or HB Textil.
HB Textil winSuppl. price segments.Higher sales & lower costMore attractive supplier.Increased profitability.PRG winRelations key customers.Access to grocery channelAssortment suppl. Thelow priced of Hb Textil.Lower cost/Less risk.
Jbs winNew prod. categories +prod. for ladies/childr.Opport. to expand toother countriesPRG winRelations key customersSupplementing assort.Opportunities in No, SweAccess to channels.Lower cost, less risk.
![Page 18: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusion - Which strategic option should be prioritized?
Conclusion:3 Strategic options
1. Enter DK on its own.2. Enter DK by acquisition.
3. Enter DK by a JV.
Conclusion:
PRG should not enter on its own.
Aquisition & Joint Ventureare both viable alternatives.
What is the recommendation?
![Page 19: Pierre Robert Group Issue Analysis Storyboard](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082908/58724fb71a28ab852f8b6c5f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
PRG should strive for an aquisition.
• Several key advantages- Reduce its cost base- Economies of scale- Access to valuable skills
• Could vastly improve competitive position, and reduce any learning curve, that otherwise would take years.
• Would remove one key competitor from market.• Allow for entering in new sale channels in Swe and No.