PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR REFINERY WASTEWATER

24
TM

Transcript of PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR REFINERY WASTEWATER

TM

• Biological IWWTP & GAC Columns

• PACT WWTP

• MBR & GAC Columns

• PAC MBR (Carbon Enhanced MBR)

• GAC MBR

High Temp (> 50 C) – Bio Difficult

High Chlorides (->1,000 mg/L )

V. High TDS (5,000 + mg/L)

V. High Feed Conc. Changes

High Ammonia/Phenol Concentrations

Frequent Flow interruptions

Refractory Organics

Conventional WWTP – Not Feasible

Carbon Adsorption Required

Conventional IWWTP & GAC Columns

PACT IWWTP

MBR & GAC Columns

PAC MBR (Carbon Enhanced)

GAC MBR – EcoRight MBR

To Effluent

Lagoons

Storm

Water

Basin

Walnut

Shell

Filters Activated

Sludge with

DAF???

Refinery Stormwater,

Process Wastewater,

Oil to Slop

Oil System

Chiller Polymer

Methanol &

pH Control

Biosludge

Thickening Dewatered Biosludge

to Disposal

Sanitary

Wastewater

API

Separators

EQ

Tanks

GAC M

Phosphate

Chlorination

• Most common system

• Biomass unstable – feed fluctuations = upsets

• Solids won’t settle in Clarifier

• Can’t meet effluent requirements w/o GAC

• Ammonia may be toxic

• Extensive plot area required to accommodate equipment – Space Limitations

MBR

Marine

Discharge

WW from

Primary

Treatment

GAC

Columns

• No Clarifier = No Settling Problems • Smaller Footprint

• More Stable Biomass

• Membrane Fouling • High Cost for GAC Replacement / Regeneration

WW from

Primary

Treatment

PAC

MBR

Marine

Discharge

~400 mg/L (~4 mg/L)

99%

(~5 mg/L)

99%

~750 mg/L (151 mg/L)

81%

(46 mg/l)

92%

~200 mg/L (27 mg/L)

86%

(11 mg/L)

94%

1.1 mg/L <0.2 mg/L

0.43 NTU <0.18 NTU

238 mg/L 27 mg/L

• No Clarifier = No Settling Problems

• Smaller Footprint

• More Stable Biomass

• Lower Cost for Carbon

• No Fouling

• Reuse Possible

• Membrane Abrasion

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

PreGAC GAC Acclimation Acclimated

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Feed

Residual %

Ae

rob

ic

Ta

nk

An

ox

ic

Ta

nk

Control Panel M

OS

TM

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Feed

Effluent

BOD (mg/L)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Feed

Effluent

Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L)

• Very Tolerant of Upsets • High Removal Efficiencies Possible • Allows Reuse – RO Not Affected by Discharge

• GAC Regeneration – Equilibrium Established • Suspension Patents Effective • GAC Not Damaged by Aeration • System Not Sensitive to High [Oil] • Nitrification Temperature Sensitive – Cooling Req’d • GAC Lasts > 6 Months • COD Analytical Problems – Chlorides / Carbonates??

• Small footprint

• High COD, TOC, and TSS removal efficiency

• Bio-refractory organics removal

• No gravity clarification

• More stable – Less upsets

• Wastewater reuse potential

• Lower capital, operating & maintenance costs

• Lower abrasion rate

• Less carbon use and less sludge

CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS

Biological

Reactor

Reclaimed

WW for

Reuse

Clarifier

(Gravity) Tertiary

Filter Carbon

Filter

WW from

Primary

Treatment

CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR PROCESS

MBR Reclaimed

WW for

Reuse

WW from

Primary

Treatment

Carbon

Filter

GAC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR PROCESS

GAC

MBR

Reclaimed

WW for

Reuse

WW from

Primary

Treatment