Philippe de Lapérouse - Global Aquaculture Alliance · 2019-09-19 · Philippe de Lapérouse...
Transcript of Philippe de Lapérouse - Global Aquaculture Alliance · 2019-09-19 · Philippe de Lapérouse...
1
Philippe de Lapérouse
HighQuest Partners United States Philippe de Lapérouse is director of HighQuest Partners’ global food and agribusiness practice. He has more than 20 years experience in senior leadership positions with global companies in the agroindustrial and value-added food chain, as well as in private-equity investing. Previously, de Lapérouse was a principal at Vanikoro Advisory LLC and director of business development for Bunge North America Inc.
Trends in Global Feed Demand for Aquaculture
Philippe de Lapérouse
Managing Director HighQuest Partners
Global daily calorie intake per capita
3
• World: 2780 kcal/person/day • Developed countries: 3420 kcal/person/day • Developing World: 2630 kcal/person/day • Sub-Saharan Africa: 2240 kcal/person/day • Central Africa: 1820 kcal/person/day • Kilocalorie: A unit of measurement of dietary energy. One kcal equals 1,000 calories and one kJ equals 1,000 joules.
In the International System of Units (ISU), the universal unit of dietary energy is the joule (J). One kcal = 4.184 kJ.
Source: UNEP-GRID-Arendal based on FAO Statistics Division Food Balance Sheets (2010)
4
Source: UNEP-GRID-Arendal based on FAO STATS(2010)
Global meat consumption per capita
Global fish consumption (2006)
5
Source: FAO SOFIA
Note: ‘Fish’ includes wild caught fish as well as commercial aquaculture products.
Global aquaculture production(1000 MT)
6
Source: UNEP-GRID-Arendal based on FAOSTAT (2011)
China is by far leading global producer of aquaculture
7
Source: FAO Fishstat Database.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1950
19
52
1954
19
56
1958
19
60
1962
19
64
1966
19
68
1970
19
72
1974
19
76
1978
19
80
1982
19
84
1986
19
88
1990
19
92
1994
19
96
1998
20
00
2002
20
04
2006
20
08
2010
MM
T
Aquaculture Production by Country 1950-2011 Source: FAO
Other
Egypt
Thailand
Norway
Korea, Republic of
Bangladesh
Philippines
Vietnam
India
Indonesia
China
8
Total seafood production and consumption per capita
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1980
19
81
1982
19
83
1984
19
85
1986
19
87
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
19
93
1994
19
95
1996
19
97
1998
19
99
2000
20
01
2002
20
03
2004
20
05
2006
20
07
2008
20
09
kg/c
apita
/yea
r
MM
T
Historical Seafood Production and Per Capita Consumption (1980-2009)
Source: FAO
Production Per Capita Consumption
Source: FAO FishStat Database
Projected seafood consumption by source through 2050
9
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1950
19
53
1956
19
59
1962
19
65
1968
19
71
1974
19
77
1980
19
83
1986
19
89
1992
19
95
1998
20
01
2004
20
07
2010
20
13
2016
20
19
2022
20
25
2028
20
31
2034
20
37
2040
20
43
2046
20
49
MM
T
Projected Global Seafood Production through 2050 Source: FAO, HighQuest Analysis
Wild Catch Aquaculture
HQP estimate based on linear growth rate (1980-2011) of production for wild catch(1.0%) and aquaculture(8.1%): • 2013 - 2021 at historical growth rate • 2022 - 2031 at 75% of historical growth rate • 2032 - 2041 at 50% of historical growth rate • 2042 - 2050 at 25% of historical growth rate
Breakdown of total wild catch and aquaculture production
10
Aquatic plants
1%
Crustaceans 7% Diadromous
fish 2%
Freshwater fish 10%
Marine fish 72%
Misc. aquatic animals
1%
Molluscs 7%
2011 Wild Capture Production Source: FAO
Aquatic plants 25%
Crustaceans 7%
Diadromous fish 5%
Freshwater fish 43%
Marine fish 2%
Misc. aquatic animals
1% Molluscs
17%
2011 Aquaculture Production Source: FAO
Global protein consumption demand
11
• Shrimp has the fastest growth rate out of all animal proteins at 4.6% annually.
• Catfish and poultry follow with a
10 year forecasted CAGR of 2.7% and 2.3% respectively.
• As seafood demand grows and
aquaculture production replaces wild-caught harvests, demand for feed within the aquaculture industry, specifically soybean meal, will increase rapidly.
Seafood and poultry will see the largest increases in demand in the coming decade
Source: FAO; HighQuest Partners
-
50,000,000
100,000,000
150,000,000
200,000,000
250,000,000
300,000,000
350,000,000
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
2020
Global Protein Demand
Poultry
Beef
Pork
Salmon
Shrimp
Catfish
Pellagic fish 1%
0.7%
2.3%
2.7% 4.6%
Aquaculture growth exceeds other animal proteins
12
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1980
19
82
1984
19
86
1988
19
90
1992
19
94
1996
19
98
2000
20
02
2004
20
06
2008
MMT
Global Growth in Protein Production (1980-2009)
Source: FAO
Meat
Eggs
Milk
Wild Catch
Aquaculture
CAGR (1980-2009)
+8.2% +1.0% +1.4% +3.2% +2.6%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1961
19
64
1967
19
70
1973
19
76
1979
19
82
1985
19
88
1991
19
94
1997
20
00
2003
20
06
2009
MM
T
Global Animal Protein Production for Food Consumption (1960-2009)
Source: FAO
Seafood Meat Eggs Milk
Feed requirements for aquaculture
13
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1990
19
92
1994
19
96
1998
20
00
2002
20
04
2006
20
08
2010
20
12
2014
20
16
2018
20
20
1,00
0 M
T
Projected Feed Requirements Source: USDA FAS, FAO, HighQuest Analysis
Land-Based Protein
Aquaculture
Aquaculture Share of Feed Demand
+2.2% CAGR
+6.4% CAGR -
100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000
1990
19
92
1994
19
96
1998
20
00
2002
20
04
2006
20
08
2010
20
12
2014
20
16
2018
20
20
1,00
0 M
T
World Protein Production Source: USDA FAS, FAO, HighQuest Analysis
Land-Based Protein Aquaculture
Note: Land-based protein includes pork, beef, broilers, dairy, and eggs.
Rising demand as per capita acreage declines
14 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
• Global consump/on of corn, soybeans and wheat has increased 291%, 768% and 170% respec/vely to 870 million MT 260 million MT and 680 million MT.
• Per capita soybean consump/on has been growing significantly (by 302% to 37 kg/ person since 1964) thanks to increasing demands from industrial sector and animal feed sector, while per capita corn and wheat consump/on reached 123 kg/ person (growth of 81%) and 96 kg/person (growth of 25%) respec/vely in 2012.
• Global harvested acreage has increased by 33% to 913 million hectares in 2012 from 689 million hectares in 1964. • Global harvested acreage on a per capita basis has dropped 38% to es/mated 0.13 ha/person in 2012 from 0.21 ha/person in
1964. • Note: The crops include barley, corn, millet, oats, rye, sorghum, wheat, mixed grain, rice and oilseeds (copra , palm kernel,
co:onseed, peanut, rapeseed, soybean, sunflower seed).
Market vola5lity driven by uncertainty of available supply
15 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
Historical global per capita feed grain and oilseed ending stocks (MT) (1964 – 2012 proj.)
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.10
Per capita feed grains ending stock Per capita oilseeds ending stock
• Global feed grains ending stock has grown by 108% to es/mated 354.7 million MT in 2012 from 170 million MT in 1964 while it has decreased by 4% to 0.05 MT/ person in 2012 on a per capita basis.
• Global oilseeds ending stock has grown over 42 /mes to es/mated 73.9 million MT in 2012 while on a per capita basis, it has grown by less than 20 /mes to es/mated 0.01 MT/ person in 2012.
Declining yield gains in major crops – can trend be reversed?
16 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
-0.01
0.01
0.03
0.05 Soybeans
-1%
1%
3%
5% Corn
-1%
1%
3%
5% Rice
-1%
1%
3%
5%
1971
19
74
1977
19
80
1983
19
86
1989
19
92
1995
19
98
2001
20
04
2007
20
10
Wheat 0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Global Yields for 4 Major Crops Historical and Projected
(MT / ha) Corn
Rice
Wheat
Soy
Source: USDA; HighQuest Analysis
Trailing 10-Year Yield Improvement
Demand for commodi5es driven by rapid GDP/capita growth in developing and emerging markets
17 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
Animal protein consump5on highly correlated with per capita GDP
18 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
Animal Protein Consumption(kg) Per Capita vs. GDP Per Capita(PPP basis) - 2010
R² = 0.67086
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
- 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
Consum
p5on
per cap
ita (k
g)
GDP per capita(PPP)
Australia USA
Japan
UAE
S. Korea Norway
New Zealand
China
Higher GDP driving demand for oilseed meal
19 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
R² = 0.93
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Oils
eed
Mea
l Con
sum
ptio
n/Cap
ita
GDP/Capita (PPP-basis)
2009 Oilseed Protein Meal Consumption/Capita vs. GDP/Capita (PPP-basis)
US
Canada
EU
Argentina
Middle EastFSU-12SE AsiaN. AfricaSSA
IndiaS. Asia
China – meal demand forecast to increase 60%
20 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
Over the past 15 years, meal consump/on in China has had a 99% correla/on with GDP per capita. Based on this correla/on and OECD projec/ons for future GDP growth in China, HighQuest projects that Chinese meal consump/on will increase by 60% over the next decade (50 to 80 million MT).
Impact of exports to China and ethanol produc5on on US farmland use
21 Proprietary information – not for distribution. Copyright © 2013 by HighQuest Partners LLC. All rights reserved.
Tilapia and shrimp production in the Americas
22
• From 1971 through 2008, Central and South America have experienced a 4.9% CAGR increase in shrimp aquaculture production.
• Mexico has experienced a 17% CAGR in shrimp
and tilapia aquaculture production during the same period.
• Central America has experienced a 3% CAGR
in shrimp production during this period while South America has experienced an11% CAGR increase.
While tilapia production in the Americas is smaller than shrimp production, it is ramping up quickly.
Source: FAO, HighQuest Analysis
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1950
19
53
1956
19
59
1962
19
65
1968
19
71
1974
19
77
1980
19
83
1986
19
89
1992
19
95
1998
20
01
2004
20
07
MT Prod
uc5o
n
Americas Tilapia Production* (1950-2008)
South America
Mexico
0 50,000
100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000
1950
19
53
1956
19
59
1962
19
65
1968
19
71
1974
19
77
1980
19
83
1986
19
89
1992
19
95
1998
20
01
2004
20
07
MT P
rodu
ctio
n
Americas Shrimp Production* (1950-2008)
South America Central America Mexico
Soybean meal demand for aqua feed in the Caribbean Basin and Canada
23
• Soybean meal required for aquaculture rations in the Caribbean Basin and Canada will continue to increase to over 450,000 tons per year by 2030.
• US suppliers can expect to supply
most of the additional soybean meal required by these regions due to landed price competitiveness, preferential trade relationships and the positive marketing of US soybeans and soy bean products throughout the region.
Source: FAO; HighQuest Analysis
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1950
19
54
1958
19
62
1966
19
70
1974
19
78
1982
19
86
1990
19
94
1998
20
02
2006
20
10
2014
20
18
2022
20
26
2030
MT
Caribbean Basin and Canada Soybean Meal Usage for Aqua feed
1950-2030F
Honduras
El Salvador
Panama
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Colombia
Canada
Ecuador
Mexico
Salmon feed rations
24
Salmon feed ra@ons are becoming less dependent on fish meal , using soy isolates and meals as replacements.
Source: Jan Van Eys, PhD
Blood gluten meal 2%
Corn gluten meal 2%
Fish meal Hi CP 30%
Fish meal Low CP 9%
Meat + bone meal 2%
Meat meal 3%
Rice bran 2%
Soybean Meal, CF<5-7 %; CP < 44 %
1%
Soybean Meal, CF<5-7 %; CP > 44 %
5%
Soy Protein Conc 10%
Wheat 10%
Wheypowder 2%
All Additives (oil+vit+min+carbs)
22%
Salmon Feed Ra5ons • Salmon feed is likely to reduce its dependence on fish meal for protein
content. • Soybean isolates and new varieties of conventional and GM
soybeans are being developed to replace the amino acids that are predominantly provideed by fish meal.
• These new varieties of soybeans are not yet commercially available.
• Fish meal or oil is currently needed to provide salmon with Omega-3 fatty
acids, methionine and cystine. • Soybean meal will still grow a viable fish stock, however the
Omega-3’s touted as the primary health benefit of salmon consumption is dependent on the amount of Omega-3 fatty acids in the diet.
• Soybean meal is unpalatable to Chinook salmon and most carnivorous
fish at certain stages of development. • Development in additives are being tested.
• There are lectins present in SBM that reduce nutrient absorption in salmonids, however lectins can be deactivated by treatment during processing.
• Trypsin inhibitors also present in SBM inhibit some protein absorption .
Salmon feed rations
25
Currently, farmed salmon require only 39% fish meal and oil in their diet compared with almost 80% less than a decade ago. This percentage is expected to continue decreasing. • Despite a stagnant supply of fish meal, salmon
production has been increasing. Soybean meal and other protein substitutes are increasingly being formulated into rations for farmed salmon in an effort to reduce costs and compensate for the decreasing supply of fish meal.
• A minimum of 15% of the feed ration for salmon needs to composed of fish oil as this is the main source of omega-3-fatty acids, which is an important marketing characteristic of salmon.
– Commercial rations could reduce the use of fish oil further if a plant based or other plausible source of omega-3-fatty acids were discovered.
– Currently there are no restrictions on nor monitoring of the levels of Omega-3’s present in salmon.
Source: Marine Harvest
Tilapia feed rations
26
Tilapia are herbivorous fish and therefore require little animal protein in their diet; soybean meal currently accounts for 27% of tilapia commercial rations.
Bloodmeal sp.dr. 2%
Corn 8%
Corn gluten 3%
Cottonseed ext 4%
DDGS 7%
Feathermeal, hydr 2%
Fish meal; CP 3%
Fish meal; Low 4%
Peanut ext 2%
Meat + bone meal 2%
Meat meal 3%
Rape seed, ext 3%
Rice 3%
Rice bran 6%
Soybean Meal, CF<5-7 %; CP < 44 %
7%
Soybean Meal, CF<5-7 %; CP > 44 %
20%
Wheat 8%
Wheat bran 3%
Wheat middlings 2%
All Additives 9%
Tilapia Protein Feed Rations • As tilapia are herbivorous, there are several viable
plant protein options that can be used in tilapia feed. • Experiments have been conducted testing
various alternatives such as algae, insect meals and plant fodder that is readily available depending on location.
• For example, in Mexico wheat is used on talipia feed rations as it is a readily available and an abundant crop.
• Other locally sourced feeds may include pig manure or other natural fertilizers that promote the growth of algae and other organisms that tilapia consume.
• Tilapia require minimal fish meals and oils in their diet for optimal development.
Source: Jan Van Eys, PhD
Commercial feed rations for shrimp
27
• High-quality shrimp feed is essential as these organisms have highly sensitive response systems.
– For this reason, most all shrimp production uses commercial feed rations.
– As any fluctuation is the amount of soybean meal used to feed shrimp can be disruptive to nutrient absorption in the digestive tract and cause loss in the shrimp population, typically there is not much variation in the use of soybean meal.
Commercial shrimp feed consists of 24% soybean meal (incl. soy protein concentrate).
Whey powder mealdr. 1%
Corn 5%
Corn glutenmeal 5%
Fish meal; CP 10%
Fish meal; Low CP 5%
Fish oil 3%
Meat meal 3%
Rice 5%
Soybean Meal, CF<5-‐7 %; CP > 44 %
19%
Soy Protein Conc 5%
Wheat 13%
Wheat glutenmeal 10%
Wheat middlings 2%
Wheypowder 2%
All addi/ves (fats+carb+min+vit)
12%
Shrimp Feed Rations
Source: Jan Van Eys, PhD
Protein meal - historical prices
28
Fish meal prices are expected to continue rising as restrictions on wild catch remain in place and constrains the total fishmeal supply.
Source: The Jacobsen; HighQuest Analysis
• Soybean meal prices are approximately 30% of the FOB cost of fish meal; $410 / MT for soybean meal compared to $1420 / MT for fish meal.
• The price of fish meal has been extremely volatile over the past 3 - 4 years, ranging between $900 - $1900/ton due to shrinking stocks.
• Fish meal prices will continue rising as fishing bans are implemented and wild fish populations continue depleting due to over fishing.
• Current fish meal stocks cannot support the growing aquaculture industry and it is unlikely that new sources of fishmeal will be discovered.
• Advances in developing new amino acid profiles for soybean meal will determine whether soybean meal will be able to completely subsititute for fish meal as a feed ingredient in aquaculture production.
Fish Meal vs. Soybean Meal Prices
SBM: C. Illinois
Corn Gluten Meal
Fish Meal: Peru
29
Alternative protein meals in aquaculture feed
Alternative feeds for both carnivorous and herbivorous fish are being explored based on the recent increases in feed ingredient prices, particularly soybean meal and fish meal. • Herbivorous feeds substitutes for tilapia include algae, paraphytin and other grains or oilseed meals including copra,
rapeseed, jatropha. – Jatropha is being researched heavily to be made commercially available, however soybean meal currently
has a better nutritional profile and has not acted as a full substitute in most aqua feeds. – Algae research is being conducted based on ideal nutrition profiles along with how to make the algae
commercially available. There are algal oils currently being used in the human food market that contain Omega-3’s, however these oils are not economically efficient to extract and therefore are mainly being used in the human food market where retail prices for the products are much higher than fish feeds.
• Alternative feeds for carnivorous species include: – Copepods can be grown on substrates such as woodchips while also acting as a filtration system, thus this is
potentially a low cost way of providing feed (this is not yet a commercial viable option but is being researched as such).
– Insect meal is not commercially available, but could provide a high quality nutrition source for a wider variety of amino acids than vegetable proteins provide.
– Fish by-products include fish heads, tails, entrails, etc. Fish by-products are difficult to use on a large scale as they require expensive container shipment. Fish meal prices would have to continue to rise to make this worthy of investment. In Alaska alone there are 1MMT of fish byproducts produced per year. This is the entire fish meal demand of US fish farm operations and could feed one billion fish. However, the cost to gather and process fish by-products is not competitive with wild caught fish meal prices.
Specialty soybeans and soy isolates will increasingly replace fish meal and other animal proteins.
Informed decision making for global agricultural investing
30
Philippe de Lapérouse
Managing Director HighQuest Partners, LLC
314-994-3282
[email protected] www.highquestpartners.com
1005 North Warson Road, Suite 226 – St. Louis, Missouri 63124 – USA (314) 994-3282 | www.highquestpartners.com