Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

16
Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Transcript of Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Page 1: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

PersuasionThroughRhetoric

Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Page 2: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

RHETORIC is the art of PERSUASION.

It differs from LOGIC, which seeks to establish a conclusion.

2

Page 3: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Rhetoric uses the psychological (rhetorical)

force of expressions to influence our attitudes.

3

Page 4: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

EXAMPLE:

4

Calling a scientist a “so-called” scientist suggests he/she is something less than a true scientist.

It DOWNPLAYS his/her credentials.

Page 5: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

NOTHING WRONG with trying to be persuasive or

with using rhetoric to dress up or sell an argument.

Good writers choose words carefully, to make their writing

persuasive.

5

Page 6: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

But this is CRITICAL THINKING!

It means not being SEDUCED by rhetoric.

6

Page 7: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Being able to make wise decisions and reasonable and

well-founded judgments…

…depends largely on our ability to “see through” rhetoric to evidence and argument.

7

Page 8: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Distinguish between rhetoric and argument

Be able to identify the more common forms of rhetoric

We should be able to do this:

8

Page 9: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Specifically, these: Euphemism/

dysphemism Persuasive analogy,

persuasive definition, and persuasive explanation

Innuendo Loaded question

Hyperbole Stereotype Ridicule/

sarcasm Weaseler Downplayer Proof surrogate

9

Page 10: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Ridicule/Sarcasm“John McCain made a great speech last night.

Everyone awakened feeling refreshed.”

Specific rhetorical devices.

10

Page 11: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Hyperbole (hype; exaggeration)“Is Deborah generous? She’d give you her life

savings if she thought you were in need.”

Specific rhetorical devices.

11

Page 12: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Euphemism (makes it sound better)“collateral damage”; “sleeping around” Dysphemism (makes it sound worse)“junk food”; “geezer”

Specific rhetorical devices.

12

Page 13: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Rhetorical definition“An environmentalist is a tree-hugging

extremist.” Rhetorical explanation“The reason environmentalists won’t let you cut

down a tree is they want to put everyone out of work.”

Rhetorical analogy“Your average environmentalist is about as

smart as a toilet seat.”

13

Page 14: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Stereotype“What did he expect marrying her? She’s just a

dumb blond.” Downplayer“Pornography is a problem, but we must protect

free speech.”

“These self-appointed experts on the environment are just trying to scare us.”

Proof surrogate“Clearly she shouldn’t have done that.”

14

Page 15: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Innuendo“I didn’t say Bush invaded Iraq to help his

buddies in the oil industry. I just said his buddies have done very well since the invasion.”

Weaseler Loaded question —rests on an

assumption that should have been established but wasn’t

“When did you stop cheating on your girl friend?”

15

“This may cure your problem.”

Page 16: Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

NEVER dismiss a statement or argument simply because it contains rhetoric. Rhetoric has a legitimate place in discourse. A solid claim or a good argument may well contain powerful rhetoric.

But don’t accept a statement/argument BECAUSE of its rhetorical force. Evaluate it on its MERITS!

One final caution:

16