Perna viridis, to Predict the Potential Spread in ... · Invasion of the Green Mussel Native to the...
Transcript of Perna viridis, to Predict the Potential Spread in ... · Invasion of the Green Mussel Native to the...
KATIE MCFARLAND, MOLLY RYBOVICH, ASWANI K. VOLETY
F L O R I D A G U L F C O A S T U N I V E R S I T Y, M A R I N E A N D E C O L O G I C A L S C I E N C E S , 1 0 5 0 1 F G C U B LV D , F O RT
M Y E R S , F L
Investigation of Environmental Tolerances of the Invasive Green Mussel,
Perna viridis, to Predict the Potential Spread in Southwest Florida
Invasion of the Green Mussel
Native to the Indo-Pacific (Vakily, 1989)
Subtidal Tropical to subtropical
First observed in Tampa Bay in 1999 (Benson et al., 2011; Ingrao et al., 2001)
Ballast water and/or biofouling from ships coming to port from the Caribbean
Free swimming larval stage has allowed for a rapid spread throughout Southwest Florida including Estero Bay
Invasive species can pose a serious threat to ecosystems and infrastructure Biofouling organisms coat boat hulls, docks and pilings Compete with local bivalves for substrate and food
Competition with Oysters
Oysters form permanent 3-dimensional habitat essential to many economically and ecologically important species of fish and crab
Oyster reefs form natural break walls that help prevent erosion and increase sedimentation
Green mussels form more of a 2-dimensional mat over hard substrate and disarticulate upon death Tampa Bay observed a nearly 50% displacement of the oyster population upon the arrival of the green mussel (Baker et al., 2006)
While locally green mussels are currently primarily found in the more marine portions of the estuary, some isolated individuals have been found on reefs within the bay
Local Watershed and Environmental Characteristics
• Shallow estuaries (average of 3 feet) allow for rapid environmental changes (Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve Management Plan, March 2013)
• Temperature remains fairly stable ranging with averages from 16 - 32˚C (Barnes, et al., 2007)
• Desiccation stress: With the already shallow water and most hard substrate in the intertidal region organism living on oyster reefs must be adapted to periods areal exposure
• Extreme wet and dry seasons cause drastic variations in salinity (Barnes, et al., 2007)
– Winter: 28-38 ppt – Summer: 0-10 ppt
• Anthropogenic forces have drastically altered the watersheds of Southwest Florida estuaries
- Estuaries have gained more tributaries many of which run through areas of increased urbanization
Objectives
Understand environmental boundaries of the invasive green mussel and predict the potential for spread
Salinity Survival is a clear indication of environmental limits But sub-lethal effects can also limit the spread of a new species
Desiccation Are green mussels capable of occupying hard substrate in the shallow
waters of Southwest Florida estuaries?
Do green mussels pose a threat to our native oyster reefs? How can we reduce this risk to oysters?
Methods: Physiological Response to Decreased Salinities
Osmolality An acute salinity change for both oysters and green mussels (5,
10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 ppt)
Hemolymph was drawn at T = 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 96, 120 hours
Hemolymph osmolality of bivalves was compared with that of the exposure seawater using a vapor pressure osmometer
Clearance Rate Clearance rates were measured for both oysters and green
mussels following an acute salinity change (10, 15, 25, 35 ppt)
Bivalves were fed the phytoplankton T. iso in a static system
Algal cell concentration monitored over time using flow cytometery
Internal Osmolality at Decreased Salinities
Green mussels were unable to reach osmotic equilibrium with the external environment at salinities of 5 and 10 ppt after 1 week of exposure
Oysters reached equilibrium at 10 ppt and above within 24 hours and as low as 5 ppt within the week exposure Well adapted for low salinities
prevailing in SW Florida summers
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Green mussels
Oysters
Water
Time (Hours)
Osm
ola
lity
(mO
sm /
L)
5 ppt 10 ppt
15 ppt 20 ppt
30 ppt25 ppt
Changes in Clearance Rates in response to an Acute Salinity Decrease
Green mussels showed a significant decrease in clearance rates at salinities of 10 and 15 ppt compared to optimal salinities of 25 and 35 ppt
Oysters did not show any significant differences in clearance rate at all salinities
Methods: Survival in Response to Decreased Salinity Exposures
Acute Salinity Changes
Salinity adjusted from 30 ppt to 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 (control), 35 ppt in triplicate tanks (N=20 / tank)
Test conditions were maintained for 56 days with survival monitored daily
Gradual Salinity Change
Salinity was adjusted gradually from 30 ppt by 3 ppt every other day to final salinities of 30 (control), 27, 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9, 6, 3 ppt in triplicate tanks (N=20 / tank)
Final salinities were maintained for an additional 28 days
Acute Salinity Decrease
Time (days)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% S
urvi
val
0
20
40
60
80
100
5 ppt E
10 ppt E
15 ppt D
20 ppt A
25 ppt A
30 ppt B
35 ppt C
Poor survival below 20 ppt and 100% mortality at 5 and 10 ppt
Gradual Salinity Decrease
≥97% survival at salinities of 9 ppt and above
After only 13 days at 3 ppt 100% mortality was observed
Time (days)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Sur
viva
l (%
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
30 ppt
27 ppt
24 ppt
21 ppt
18 ppt
15 ppt
12 ppt
9 ppt
6 ppt
3 ppt
Methods: Desiccation
Green mussels and oysters exposed
to desiccation under direct sunlight
(intertidal exposure) or underwater
(subtidal) conditions for 0, 2, 4, 6,
and 8 hours
Internal temperature of organisms measured using a temperature probe inserted into the shell cavity through a narrow hole that was sealed after insertion
External temperature measured using an aquarium thermometer
Survival of oysters and green mussels were noted in both experimental and control treatments and expressed as cumulative mortality
B C A
Desiccation: High Temperatures
97% mortality in green mussels while oysters showed only 4% mortality
Both showed similar internal temperatures, but mussels died with increasing frequency as temperature increased
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 100 200 300 400 500
Inte
rn
al
Te
mp
(˚C
)
Elapsed Time (Minutes)
Average GM Internal Temp Average O Internal Temp
0102030405060708090
0 10 20 30 40
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Mo
rta
lity
(%
)
Internal Temperature (OC)
Green Mussels
Oysters
Desiccation: Low temperatures
Field observations in the winter of 2012 High numbers of juvenile recruitment was observed in the
intertidal zone in December of 2011
A month later in January 2012 found dead
Lab experiments documented
in the literature confirm an
intolerance of P. viridis to
desiccation under cold air
temperatures (Firth et al., 2011; Urian et al., 2011)
Red Tide Blooms
Previously documented die offs following Red Tide blooms in Tampa Bay (Baker et al., 2012)
Field monitoring in Estero Bay (March 2011 – current): During periods of Red Tide observed:
Increased mortalities Slowed growth Decreased juvenile recruitment
Brevetoxin ELISA’s showed an accumulation of toxins in the tissues
Lack of sufficient co-evolution period between Perna viridis and
Karenia brevis
Trophic Transfer?
Month
Feb Mar April June Aug
Ave
rage
Bre
veto
xin
Con
cent
ratio
n (n
g/g)
0
5e+4
1e+5
2e+5
2e+5
3e+5
3e+5
In Conclusion: What is the Potential Threat?
Salinity is a limiting factor When the change is a acute P. viridis is unable to adapt If the change is gradual P. viridis may be capable of pushing into lower
salinity regions of the estuary
Desiccation With the shallow waters of Estero Bay, P. viridis is unlikely to be able to
populate the intertidal zone Air temperatures can be significantly lower than winter water temperatures
However, deep estuaries may be at risk even if salinities drop as low as 15ppt
Oysters were able to adapt to all test salinities and showed high tolerance to desiccation stress even at high internal temperatures Well adapted to harsh conditions in SW Florida estuaries Will likely remain the dominant intertidal bivalve
Acknowledgements
Funding: U. S. Department of Education
U. S. EPA
Marco Island Shell Club
South Florida Water Management District
Technical and field support: Vester Marine Field and Research Station
Coastal Watershed Institute
Lesli Haynes, Robert Wasno, Jeffrey Devine, David Segal Rheannon Ketover, Julie Neurohr and Brooke Denkert.
References
Baker, P., J. S. Fajans, W. S. Arnold, D. A. Ingrao, D. C. Marelli, and S. M. Baker. 2007. Range and dispersal of a tropical marine invader, the Asian green mussel, Perna viridis, in subtropical waters of the southeastern United States. Journal of Shellfish Research 26:345-355.
Baker, P., J. S. Fajans, and S. M. Baker. 2012. Habitat dominance of a nonindiginous tropical bivalve, Perna viridis (Linnaeus, 1758), in a subtropical estuary in the Gulf of Mexico Journal of Molluscan Studies 78:28-33.
Baker, P., J. S. Fajans, S. M. Baker, and D. Bergquist. 2006. Green mussels in Florida, USA: Review of trends and research. World Aquaculture 37:43-67.
Barnes, T., A. Volety, K. Chartier, F. Mazzotti, and L. Pearlstine. 2007. A habitat suitability index model for the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), a tool for restoration of the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida. Journal of Shellfish Research 26:949-959.
Benson, A. J., D. C. Marelli, M. E. Frischer, J. M. Danforth, and J. D. Williams. 2001. Establishment of the green mussel, Perna viridis (Linnaeus 1758)(Mollusca: Mytilidae) on the west coast of Florida. Journal of Shellfish Research 20:21-30.
Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, March 2013. Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve: Management Plan. (Award No. NO11NOS4190077-CM227)
Firth, L. B., A. M. Knights, and S. S. Bell. 2011. Air temperature and winter mortality: Implications for the persistence of the invasive mussel,< i> Perna viridis</i> in the intertidal zone of the south-eastern United States. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 400:250-256.
Ingrao, D. A., P. M. Mikkelsen, and D. W. Hicks. 2001. Another introduced marine mollusk in the Gulf of Mexico: the Indo-Pacific green mussel, Perna viridis, in Tampa Bay, Florida. Journal of Shellfish Research 20:13-19.
Urian, A. G., J. D. Hatle, and M. R. Gilg. 2011. Thermal constraints for range expansion of the invasive green mussel, Perna viridis, in the southeastern United States. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 315:12-21.
Vakily, J. 1989. The biology and culture of mussels of the genus Perna. The World Fish Center.