1 STABLE ISOTOPIC AND FATTY ACID EVIDENCE FOR UPTAKE OF FISH FARMING INDUCED ORGANIC POLLUTANTS BY...
-
Upload
aileen-lindsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 STABLE ISOTOPIC AND FATTY ACID EVIDENCE FOR UPTAKE OF FISH FARMING INDUCED ORGANIC POLLUTANTS BY...
1
STABLE ISOTOPIC AND FATTY ACID EVIDENCE FOR UPTAKE OF FISH FARMING INDUCED ORGANIC
POLLUTANTS BY FILTER-FEEDING MUSSELS (PERNA VIRIDIS) IN A POLYCULTURE SYSTEM
Kevin Q F Gao1, S G Cheung1, G H Lin2,3; S P Chen2; Paul K S Shin1
1Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong.2Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
3Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, USA.
2
Introduction: Fish farming is an important economic activity world-wide.
3
Introduction: Fish farming leads to pollution due to uneaten feed, faeces and excretion.
4
Introduction: Bivalve mussels can filter particulate matter in high efficiency.
5
Introduction: Polyculture, combining fish and mussels, can achieve an environmental and economic Win-Win solution.
Canadian Mussel Export Values (X106US$)
0
5
10
15
20
25
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Year
Ex
po
rt V
alu
e
6
Introduction: Trophic markers
Stable Isotopes:
Changes in stable isotope ratios (e.g., 13C/12C and 15N/14N) are predictable when matter is transported along trophic levels; they can thus be used as markers to trace matter flow: food or pollutant sources and fates.
7
Introduction: Trophic markers
Fatty Acid Profile
Sink-specific and conservative in transportation and transformation
Use of Multiple Markers
Improve the accuracy of determining source and sink
8
Objectives
1 To quantify the contribution of potential food sources to the mussel ration.
2 To evaluate the feasibility and capability of filter-feeding bivalves as biofilters for organic wastes from fish farming activities in a polyculture system.
9
Experimental site: Kau Sai marine fish culture zone - a semi-enclosed bay
10
Methods
1 Mussels transplanted to fish rafts and a reference site (without effects from fish farms).
11
Methods
2. Sampling from fish raft and reference site: mussels, particulate matter, fish feed and fish faeces after 3 months in the field.
3. Sample analysis: 2 aliquots for all samples
Aliquot 1 for stable isotope ratios (13C/12C and 15N/14N) with EA-IRMS;
Aliquot 2 for fatty acid profiles with GC-FID
4. Data analysis:
Comparison: Mussel tissue between fish raft and reference site with t-test.
Isotope mixing model: Contribution of food sources to mussel tissue.
Principle Component Analysis (PCA) ordination: For fatty acid profiles.
12
Results: Stable Isotopes
Comparison of stable isotope values in mussel tissue between fish raft and reference site
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Reference site
Fish Raft
δ13C (‰)
δ15N (‰)
δ13C=[(13C/12C)smpl/ (13C/12C)std-1]X1000‰
δ15N=[(15N/14N)smpl/ (15N/14N)std-1]X1000‰
13
Results: Stable Isotopes
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-22.0 -21.0 -20.0 -19.0 -18.0 -17.0 -16.0
δ13C (‰)
δ15N
(‰
)
mussel
POM
fish feed
fish feces
Dual isotope plot showing the food source of mussels at fish raft site
Contributions of food sources to mussel ration:
Based on isotope mixing model,
POM: 68.3%;
Fish feed: 27.5%;
Fish faeces: 4.2%,
14
Results: Overall Fatty Acid Profiles
Fatty Acids MFR MRS PFR PRS FFD FFC
Saturated Fatty Acids
11:0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01±0.00 0.00
12:0 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.17±0.02 0.00
14:0 7.55±0.51 5.96±0.45 3.41±0.35 3.06±0.22 5.27±0.88 1.17±0.68
15:0 0.90±0.22 0.71±0.03 0.24±0.02 0.42±0.09 0.72±0.06 0.23±0.01
16:0 30.31±3.82 35.04±3.22 29.41±2.33 24.34±2.15 32.70±1.66 8.80±1.11
18:0 10.59±0.78 7.53±0.46 2.48±0.30 4.26±0.48 9.16±1.10 7.72±0.35
17:0 1.73±0.55 2.36±0.55 0.46±0.03 0.90±0.08 1.01±0.05 0.41±0.02
20:0 0.97±0.08 0.55±0.06 0.49±0.07 0.00 0.83±0.07 0.75±0.06
21:0 0.13±0.01 0.76±0.05 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.24±0.16
22:0 0.00 0.00 0.24±0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
subtotal 52.18±1.85 52.92±1.66 36.72±1.58 33.00±1.55 49.87±1.34 20.32±1.22
MFR-mussel of Fish Raft, MFS-Mussel of Ref. Site, PFR-POM of Fish RaftPFS-POM of Ref. Site, FFD- Fish Feed, FFC-Fish faeces (meanSD, N=3-9)
15
Results: Overall Fatty Acid ProfilesMonounsaturated Fatty Acids
15:1n5 0.00 0.00 0.84±0.03 1.79±0.01 0.04 0.00
17:1n7 0.21±0.01 0.68±0.02 3.16±0.16 7.25±0.22 0.60±0.03 0.64±0.03
16:1n7 10.65±0.68 8.47±0.56 17.76±1.23 17.73±1.33 8.28±1.02 8.67±0.89
18:1n9 4.66±0.16 2.27±0.09 2.38±0.09 2.11±0.11 12.75±1.35 24.86±1.88
18:1n7 3.85±0.11 3.52±0.15 7.67±0.22 9.78±0.36 3.89±0.11 3.55±0.15
20:1n9 2.35±0.08 3.21±0.18 0.00 0.00 0.16±0.02 0.00
22:1n9 0.45±0.05 0.61±0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39±0.05
subtotal 22.16±1.55 18.75±1.63 31.80±2.15 38.66±2.30 25.71±2.10 38.11±1.59
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
18:2n6 1.46±0.12 1.50±1.08 1.58±0.15 0.35±0.01 0.91±0.09 1.47±0.12
18:3n6 0.20±0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.28±0.01
20:2n6 0.72±0.03 0.48±0.05 0.21±0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
20:3n3 0.14±0.01 0.20±0.01 0.21±0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
20:4n6 3.30±0.22 2.97±0.36 0.77±0.05 0.00 3.42±0.25 5.26±0.26
20:5n3 8.24±0.22 12.21±1.23 16.06±1.25 14.37±1.36 7.00±0.79 7.74±0.88
22:2n6 0.00 0.92±0.05 0.25±0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
22:6n3 11.59±0.98 10.04±0.88 12.41±1.23 13.62±1.33 13.07±1.56 26.84±2.32
subtotal 25.66±1.52 28.32±2.21 31.48±3.32 28.34±2.35 24.45±2.01 41.59±3.32
16
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5
PC1 (34.9%)
PC
2 (
21
.8%
)
MFR
MRS
PFR
PRS
FFD
FFC
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5
PC1 (34.9%)
PC
2 (
21
.8%
)
MFR
MRS
PFR
PRS
FFD
FFC
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5
PC1 (34.9%)
PC
2 (
21
.8%
)
MFR
MRS
PFR
PRS
FFD
FFC
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
-1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
MFR
MRS
FFD
Results: Overall Fatty Acid Profiles
PCA ordination plot showing the Overall fatty acid profiles of mussels and their food sources
POM at reference site
POM at fish raft
Fish feed, fish raft only
Fish feces, fish raft only
Mussels at fish raft
Mussels at reference site
17
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
14:0 18:0 18:1n9 20:5n3 16:0 18:1n7 22:6n3
Fat
ty a
cid
conc
(%
)Results: Single Fatty Acids
Effects of fish feed fatty acids on mussel tissue
No effectS
ources identical
Negative
Effect
Positive Effect
Mu
ssel, fish
raft
Fish
fee
d, ra
ft o
nly
PO
M, fish
raft
PO
M, re
f. site
Mu
ssel, re
f site
18
Discussion
2. Combined evidence of stable isotopes and fatty acid profiles showed that filter-feeding mussels could directly consume the organic wastes derived from fish farming activities.
1. The distinct stable isotopic and fatty acid signatures of different sources can be used as trophic markers to trace the transfer of organic matter along the food chains.
3. Eutrophic nitrogen and phosphorus could be fixed by mussel assimilation before the waste mineralization.
4. The mussels in a polyculture system can function as biofilters to reduce the nutrient released from uneaten fish feed and egested fish faeces in fish farms.
19
Acknowledgements
• Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) of Hong Kong government for funding;
• Group colleagues for sampling assistance;
• Technicians in Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences;
• Department technicians
20
Thank You!