· Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as...

28

Transcript of  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as...

Page 1:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 2:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 3:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 4:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 5:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 6:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 7:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 8:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 9:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 10:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 11:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 12:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 13:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 14:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 15:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 16:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 17:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 18:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 19:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 20:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 21:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 22:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 23:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 24:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 25:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 26:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 27:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 28:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later