Performance Tests in Tennessee 2011 · 2014-06-09 · Angela Thompson McClure Extension Specialist...
71
Research Report 12-03 Soybean Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee Fred L. Allen Coordinator Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations Richard Johnson Research Associate Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations Robert C. Williams Jr. Extension Area Specialist Grain Crops Angela Thompson McClure Extension Specialist Corn and Soybeans Melvin Newman Professor Entomology and Plant Pathology Pat Donald Research Plant Pathologist USDA-ARS Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Knoxville, Tennessee Telephone: 865-974-8821 • Fax: 865-974-1947 Email: [email protected] Variety test results are posted on UT’s website at: http://varietytrials.tennessee.edu and www.utcrops.com RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTERS AND COUNTY STANDARD TESTS 2011
Transcript of Performance Tests in Tennessee 2011 · 2014-06-09 · Angela Thompson McClure Extension Specialist...
Research Report 12-03
Soybean Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee
Fred L. Allen Coordinator Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations
Richard Johnson Research Associate Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations
Robert C. Williams Jr.Extension Area Specialist Grain Crops
Angela Thompson McClureExtension Specialist Corn and Soybeans
Melvin Newman Professor Entomology and Plant Pathology
Pat DonaldResearch Plant Pathologist USDA-ARS
Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and DemonstrationsDepartment of Plant Sciences
University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Knoxville, Tennessee
Telephone: 865-974-8821 • Fax: 865-974-1947 Email: [email protected]
Variety test results are posted on UT’s website at:http://varietytrials.tennessee.edu and www.utcrops.com
RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTERS AND COUNTY STANDARD TESTS
2011
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station and UT Extension with partial funding from participating companies. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following individuals in conducting these experiments: Dept. of Plant Sciences Vince Pantalone, Professor and Soybean Breeder Virginia Sykes, Graduate Research Assistant, Agronomic Variety Testing Program Victoria Knapp, Undergraduate Assistant Effion Hughes, Undergraduate Assistant Research & Education Centers: East Tennessee: East Tennessee Research & Education Center, Knoxville Robert Simpson, Center Director Bobby McKee, Sr. Farm Crew Leader Lee Ellis, Research Assistant Middle Tennessee: Highland Rim Research & Education Center, Springfield Barry Sims, Center Director Brad Fisher, Research Assistant West Tennessee: Research & Education Center at Milan, Milan Blake Brown, Center Director Jason Williams, Research Associate James McClure, Research Associate Research & Education Center at Ames Plantation, Grand Junction Rick Carlisle, Center Director Marshall Smith, Research Associate Jamie Evans, Research Associate
2
2011 County Standard Tests -- Soybean Cooperators & Agents Group III Cooperator(s) Agent Coffee L.A. Teal & Mike England Steve Harris Dyer Alan Burchfield Tim Campbell Fulton, KY Johnson Linder Ben Mullins/Cam Kenimer Gibson Denton Clay Parkins Philip Shelby Lake Jack Haynes Greg Allen Madison Matt Griggs Bill Wyatt/Jake Mallard REC at Milan 1 & 2 Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman Obion Kenneth & Blake Cheatham Tim Smith Weakley Ronnie & Jay Yeargin Jeff Lannom WTREC Dr. Bob Hayes Dr. Angela McClure Group IV Early Ballard, KY Jeff Sullivan Bob Middleton Coffee L.A. Teal & Mike England Steve Harris Dyer Mike Underwood Tim Campbell Fulton, KY Johnson Linder Ben Mullins/Cam Kenimer Gibson Denton Clay Parkins Philip Shelby Hickman Clint & Claude Callicott Troy Dugger Lake Jon Dickey Greg Allen Lauderdale 1 & 2 Dr. Melvin Newman REC at Milan 1 & 2 Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman Obion Kenneth & Blake Cheatham Tim Smith Weakley J.D. McDaniel Jeff Lannom Group IV Late Coffee L.A. Teal & Mike England Steve Harris Dyer Mike Underwood Tim Campbell Fayette Lee Graves Jeff Via Franklin Sam Jones Ed Burns/Creig Kimbro Fulton, KY Mark Yaussi Cam Kenimer/Ben Mullins Gibson Denton Clay Parkins Philip Shelby Giles Brian Flowers Kevin Rose Hardeman Daniel Jacobs Lee Sammons/Mike Morris Haywood John King Walter Battle Lake Jon Dickey Greg Allen Lauderdale 1 & 2 Dr. Melvin Newman Madison Matt Griggs Bill Wyatt/Jake Mallard Marion Dewey & Randy Gilliam Matt Webb/Jared Goad McCracken, KY Lester & Tracy Sullivan Bob Middleton Montgomery Steve Joiner/Michael Suiter Rusty Evans REC at Milan 1 & 2 Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman Obion Kenneth & Blake Cheatham Tim Smith Weakley Brian Garner Jeff Lannom
3
Group V Early Cooperator(s) Agent Carlisle, KY Curtsinger Farms Bob Middleton Coffee L.A. Teal & Mike England Steve Harris Crockett Stoney Hargett Richard Buntin Dyer David Sentell Tim Campbell Franklin Sam Jones Ed Burns/Creig Kimbro Gibson Denton Clay Parkins Philip Shelby Hardeman Daniel Jacobs Lee Sammons/Mike Morris Haywood John King Walter Battle Lake Jack Haynes Greg Allen Lauderdale 1 & 2 Dr. Melvin Newman REC at Milan 1 & 2 Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman Obion Bill Thompson Tim Smith Shelby Scott Johnson Becky Muller Shelby Jerry Tolbert Becky Muller Liberty Link MG4 Late (4.6 – 4.9) Dyer Tommy Cross Tim Campbell Lake Keith Hulme Greg Allen REC at Milan (irr./fung.) Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman REC at Milan (irr./no fung.) Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Melvin Newman REC at Milan Dr. Blake Brown Dr. Angela McClure Obion Bill Sellers Tim Smith
4
Table of Contents
Experimental Procedures................................................................................................... 6 Interpretation of data.......................................................................................................... 7 Results……………….......................................................................................................... 7 Location information from Research and Education Centers where the soybean variety tests were conducted in 2011………………………………………………………….. 9 Roundup Ready Maturity Group III Soybean Tests………………………………………….. 10 Roundup Ready Early Maturity Group IV Soybean Tests (4.0 – 4.5)………………………. 15 Roundup Ready Late Maturity Group IV Soybean Tests (4.6 – 4.9)………………..…....... 24 Roundup Ready Early Maturity Group V Soybean Tests (5.0 – 5.5)……………..………… 35 Roundup Ready Late Maturity Group V Soybean Tests (5.6 – 5.9)………………………... 45 Conventional / Liberty Link Maturity Group IV Soybean Tests……………….……………... 49 Conventional / Liberty Link Maturity Group V Soybean Tests……………….…………….... 57 Soybean Characteristics………………………………………………………………………… 63 Seed Company Contact Information…………………………………………………………… 69
5
PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN TENNESSEE RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTERS AND COUNTY STANDARD TESTS
Experimental Procedures
Research & Education Center Tests: All soybean variety trials were conducted in each of the physiographic regions of the state. Tests were conducted at the Ames Plantation (Grand Junction), Highland Rim (Springfield), East Tennessee (Knoxville), and Milan (Milan), Research & Education Centers (REC). Three of the Roundup Ready tests (RR4 early, RR4 late, RR5 early) were also planted at the Agricenter International Research Center (Memphis), but were not harvested due to intense weed competition from Palmer pigweed. Duplicate plantings of all seven tests [Maturity Group 3 Roundup Ready (i.e., RR3), RR4 early (relative maturity 4.0– 4.5), RR4 late (RM 4.6-4.9) RR5 early (RM 5.0-5.5), RR5 late (RM 5.6-5.9), Conventional / Liberty Link RM 4, and Conventional / Liberty Link RM5] were made at the Milan and Highland Rim RECs for performance testing with and without irrigation. The plot size at all REC locations was two rows, 30 feet in length with 30 inch row spacings. All varieties were planted at approximately 10 seeds per foot of row (i.e., approximately 175,000 seed per acre REC tests). Plots were replicated three times at each location in a randomized complete block design. Plots at Milan and Springfield were sprayed with a foliar fungicide approximately one month after planting, and again approximately 21 days later as a preventative treatment for fungal diseases such as soybean rust. Soybean rust was not detected in Tennessee this year. Because of the large number of varieties in some tests and the field variation at each location, an incomplete block design was imposed ex post facto prior to data analysis in order to reduce the within-block field variability and the experimental error. Genetics and Seed Treatments: Seed of all varieties included in the REC tests were treated with one or more fungicides plus an insecticide. Research has shown that seed treatments can influence yield, therefore the yields of varieties reported herein are the combined result of the genetic potential of the varieties plus the seed treatment “packages”. The seed treatments that were included on each variety were determined by the company or organization and are listed in Table 57. Many soybean varieties are now being marketed with combinations of fungicide and insecticides on the seed, similar to corn. A decision was made to test the varieties in the UT soybean performance tests with the seed treatments so the results would be comparable to what producers could expect from seed they purchase. County Standard Tests: The County Standard Soybean Tests were conducted in 18 counties in Tennessee, and 4 in Western Kentucky. The number of county locations depended on the test (e.g., 6 - 20). The County Standard Tests were divided into RR3, RR4 early (relative maturity 4.0-4.5), RR4 late (RM 4.6-4.9), RR5 early (RM 5.0-5.5) and a Liberty Link (RM 4) test. Each variety was evaluated in a large strip-plot at each location, thus each county test was considered as one replication of the test in calculating the overall average yield and in conducting the statistical analysis to determine significant differences. At each location, plots were planted, sprayed, fertilized, and harvested with the equipment used in the cooperating producer’s farming operation. The width and length of strip-plots were different in each county; however, within a location in a county, the strips were trimmed on the ends so that the lengths were the same for each variety, or if the lengths were different then the harvested length was measured for each variety and appropriate harvested area adjustments were made to determine the yield per acre.
6
Interpretation of Data
The tables on the following pages have been prepared with the entries listed in order of performance, the highest-yielding entry being listed first. All yields presented have been adjusted to 13% moisture. At the bottom of the tables, LSD values stand for Least Significant Difference. The mean yields of any two varieties being compared must differ by at least the amount shown (minimum) to be considered different in yielding ability at the 5% level of probability of significance. For example, given that the LSD for a test is 8.0 bu/a and the mean yield of Variety A was 30 bu/a and the mean yield of Variety B was 35 bu/a, then the two varieties are not statistically different in yield because the difference of 5 bu/a is less than the minimum of 8 bu/a required for them to be significant. Similarly, if the average yield of Variety C was 43 bu/a then it is significantly higher yielding than both Variety B (43 - 35 = 8 bu/a = LSD of 8) and Variety A (43 - 30 = 13 bu/a > LSD of 8). Also, the coefficient of variation (C.V.) values are shown at the bottom of each table. This value is a measure of the error variability found within each experiment. It is the percentage that the error variation is of the overall test mean yield at that location. For example, a C.V. of 10% indicates that the size of the error variation is about 10% of the size of the test mean. Similarly, a C.V. of 30% indicates that the size of the error variation is nearly one-third as large as the test mean. A goal in conducting each yield test is to keep the C.V. as low as possible, preferably below 20%.
RESULTS Yield and Agronomic Traits. Two hundred and twenty four soybean varieties were evaluated in the 2011 Research & Education Center (REC) tests in Tennessee. There were five varieties in the RR3, 37 in the RR4E, 69 in the RR4L, 47 in the RR5E, 11 in the RR5L, 27 in the conventional / Liberty Link MG4, and 28 in the conventional / Liberty Link MG5 test. The County Standard tests (CST) involved 55 varieties total, consisting of a RR3 test (7 varieties at 11 locations), a RR4E test (12 varieties at 13 locations), a RR4L test (19 varieties at 20 locations), a RR5E test (10 varieties at 15 locations) and a Conventional / Liberty Link MG4/MG5 test (7 varieties at 6 locations). In addition to 18 Tennessee counties, the County Standard Tests involved four counties in Western Kentucky (Ballard, Carlisle, Fulton, and McCracken). Tables 2-56 contain data on yield and agronomic traits such as maturity, plant height, lodging, shattering, seed quality, seed protein and oil content. Table 57 lists the names and the companies descriptive characteristics of the varieties included in the REC tests in 2011. Table 58 contains the contact information for each soybean seed company with entries in the 2011 REC tests. Growing Season: The 2011 growing season was characterized by a wet spring resulting in some flooded fields and planting delays followed by hotter than normal conditions through June. However, much of the state received frequent rains from the second week of June through the second week of July. Afterwards, the weather conditions were hot and dry through August with cooler and wetter conditions in September providing relief for the double-crop soybeans. According to the Tennessee Agricultural Statistics Service, acreage harvested is projected to be 1.25 million acres, down 160,000 acres from last season. Soybean production for 2011 is projected to be 42.5 million bushels, down about 3 percent from the previous year. The state soybean yield average is projected to be 34 bu/a, 3 bushels above the 2010 yield.
7
CST Disease & SCN Ratings: Ratings on variety reactions to SDS, frogeye leaf spot, anthracnose, stem canker, and cercospora blight are presented in Tables 7, 16, 25, 34, and 49 (data provided by Dr. Melvin Newman, professor, Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, UT). Soybean cyst nematode (races 2, 3, and 5) ratings in these tables provided by Dr. Pat Donald, USDA-ARS, Jackson, TN.
8
Table 1. Location information from research centers where the soybean variety tests were conducted in 2011.Planting Harvest Seeding
Research Center Location Date Date Rate Soil TypeRoundup Ready Maturity Group IIIHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/5/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/18/2011 10/7/2011 175000 Dickson Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 4/25/2011 9/12/2011 175000 Sequatchie Fine Sandy LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 9/29/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 9/29/2011 175000 Grenada Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) planting 2 " 7/6/2011 10/11/2011 175000 Grenada Silt Loam
Roundup Ready Maturity Group Early IV (4.0 - 4.5)Ames Grand Junction 5/7/2011 9/29/2011 175000 Lexington Silt LoamHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/5/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/10/2011 175000 Dickson Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 4/25/2011 9/27/2011 175000 Sequatchie Fine Sandy LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/4/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/3/2011 175000 Grenada Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) planting 2 " 7/6/2011 10/21/2011 175000 Grenada Silt Loam
Roundup Ready Maturity Group Late IV (4.6 - 4.9)Ames Grand Junction 5/7/2011 9/30/2011 175000 Lexington Silt LoamHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/10/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/11/2011 175000 Dickson Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 4/25/2011 10/4/2011 175000 Sequatchie Fine Sandy LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/6/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/11/2011 175000 Grenada Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) planting 2 " 7/6/2011 11/8/2011 175000 Grenada Silt Loam
Roundup Ready Maturity Group Early V (5.0 - 5.5)Ames Grand Junction 5/7/2011 10/3/2011 175000 Lexington Silt LoamHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/17/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/26/2011 175000 Hamblen Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 4/25/2011 10/21/2011 175000 Sequatchie Fine Sandy LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/17/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/21/2011 175000 Grenada Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) planting 2 " 7/6/2011 11/9/2011 175000 Grenada Silt Loam
Roundup Ready Maturity Group Late V (5.6 - 5.9)Ames Grand Junction 5/7/2011 10/3/2011 175000 Lexington Silt LoamHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/20/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/26/2011 175000 Hamblen Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 4/25/2011 10/25/2011 175000 Sequatchie Fine Sandy LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/17/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 5/31/2011 10/21/2011 175000 Grenada Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) planting 2 " 7/6/2011 11/9/2011 175000 Grenada Silt Loam
Conventional / Liberty Link Maturity Group IVHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/6/2011 175000 Sango Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/18/2011 10/12/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 5/2/2011 10/10/2011 175000 Stasser Silt LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/7/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 6/2/2011 10/6/2011 175000 Memphis, Loring Silt Loam
Conventional / Liberty Link Maturity Group VHighland Rim (Irrigated) Springfield 5/17/2011 10/17/2011 175000 Sango Silt LoamHighland Rim (Non Irrigated) " 5/18/2011 11/2/2011 175000 Mountview Silt LoamKnoxville Knoxville 5/2/2011 10/25/2011 175000 Stasser Silt LoamMilan (Irrigated) Milan 6/1/2011 10/20/2011 175000 Loring Silt LoamMilan (Non Irrigated) " 6/2/2011 10/20/2011 175000 Memphis, Loring Silt Loam
9
Tabl
e 2.
Mea
n yi
elds
† o
f fiv
e M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
ixen
viro
nmen
ts in
Ten
ness
ee d
urin
g 20
11. Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
S
prin
gfie
ld
Mila
n
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=6)
Kno
xvill
eIrr
.N
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.N
on-Ir
r 2
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---b
u/a-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
Pro
geny
3911
RY
(RR
2Y)
44 ±
171
4023
6735
30N
KS
39-
U2
(RR
2Y)
44 ±
177
4121
5639
31Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
38R
10 (R
R)
44 ±
168
4126
6238
29D
airy
land
DS
R-3
805/
R2Y
42 ±
179
4023
5530
27N
KS
38-
H8
(RR
)41
± 1
6540
2558
3427
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)43
7240
2459
3529
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
39
68
57
3C
.V. (
%)
8.3
6.6
8.6
18.2
4.6
10.4
6.6
Tabl
e 3.
Mea
n yi
elds
† a
nd a
gron
omic
cha
ract
eris
tics
of fi
ve M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in
six
envi
ronm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=6
)(n
=6)
(n=2
)(n
=6)
(n=6
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
Pro
geny
3911
RY
(RR
2Y)
44 ±
113
.11.
634
117
1.0
2.0
40.7
22.2
1.2
NK
S 3
9-U
2 (R
R2Y
)44
± 1
13.4
2.6
3211
71.
01.
838
.722
.61.
5Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
38R
10 (R
R)
44 ±
112
.62.
336
117
1.0
1.7
39.1
23.1
1.0
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-380
5/R
2Y42
± 1
12.5
2.7
3211
91.
01.
738
.722
.71.
5N
KS
38-
H8
(RR
)41
± 1
12.6
2.1
3211
71.
01.
338
.223
.31.
2A
vera
ge43
12.9
2.3
3311
71.
01.
739
.122
.81.
3†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.Lo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.S
eed
Qua
lity
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f see
ds s
how
ing
dise
ase
or s
plit
seed
coa
ts; 5
=95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
2/11
.
10
Tabl
e 4.
Mea
n yi
eld
† of
one
Mat
urity
Gro
up II
I Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
tyev
alua
ted
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=10)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
± St
d Er
r.
Spr
ingf
ield
M
ilan
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
0)K
noxv
ille
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--bu
/a--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd38
R10
(RR
)42
± 1
5233
2261
41A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4252
3322
6141
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
C.V
. (%
)†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a R
R a
ppea
rs in
side
par
enth
eses
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
Tabl
e 5.
Mea
n yi
eld
† an
d ag
rono
mic
cha
ract
eris
tics
of o
ne M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
varie
ty e
valu
ated
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=10)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=10)
(n=1
0)(n
=5)
(n=1
0)(n
=8)
(n=5
)(n
=1)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
----
- Sco
re --
----
----
----
-%
%S
core
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd38
R10
(RR
)42
± 1
13.2
1.7
3712
21.
24.
33.
140
.822
.71.
0A
vera
ge42
13.2
1.7
3712
21.
24.
33.
140
.822
.71.
0†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5=9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Pro
tein
& O
il on
dry
wei
ght b
asis
.Fr
ogey
e =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
; 5 =
95%
+ o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts. R
atin
gs fr
om K
noxv
ille
on 8
/22/
11.
11
Tabl
e 6.
Yie
lds
† of
sev
en M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s in
11
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts in
Ten
ness
ee &
Ken
tuck
ydu
ring
2011
.R
ECR
ECat
atM
ilan
Mila
nA
vg.
(KY)
irrig
.irr
ig.
Wes
t TN
MS
Bra
nd/V
arie
tyYi
eld
Moi
stur
e ‡
Cof
fee
Dye
rFu
lton
Gib
son
Lake
Mad
ison
fung
.no
fung
.O
bion
Wea
kley
REC
bu/a
%5/
10 §
5/17
6/14
5/31
6/4
5/12
5/10
5/10
6/1
6/10
5/10
ATe
rral
RE
V-3
8R10
48.1
10.7
71.9
41.4
43.1
43.1
52.7
46.7
56.0
50.8
60.7
14.0
48.3
AB
Asg
row
AG
3831
GE
NR
R2Y
46.9
11.8
65.3
42.1
43.7
32.8
54.4
46.3
50.7
49.1
67.6
13.0
51.4
AB
CD
airy
land
380
5 R
R2Y
45.6
10.4
66.0
37.4
39.8
33.1
58.2
47.0
50.2
45.6
66.6
11.6
46.7
AB
C**
*NK
Bra
nd S
39-A
344
.510
.668
.838
.926
.739
.450
.346
.847
.739
.269
.615
.147
.2A
BC
Ste
yer 3
402R
2 G
EN
RR
2Y44
.410
.166
.838
.631
.743
.251
.444
.147
.044
.755
.912
.751
.7B
CA
sgro
w A
G38
03R
R44
.111
.170
.839
.538
.730
.149
.543
.847
.445
.655
.714
.349
.4C
Ste
yer 3
102R
2 G
EN
RR
2Y42
.010
.867
.136
.624
.140
.956
.143
.643
.437
.144
.714
.753
.2A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
45.1
10.8
68.1
39.2
35.4
37.5
53.2
45.5
48.9
44.6
60.1
13.6
49.7
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ M
oist
ure
at h
arve
st.
§ P
lant
ing
date
.E
ach
varie
ty w
as e
valu
ated
in a
larg
e st
rip-p
lot a
t eac
h lo
ctio
n, th
us e
ach
coun
ty te
st w
as c
onsi
dere
d as
one
repl
icat
ion
of
the
test
in c
alcu
latin
g th
e av
erag
e yi
eld
and
in c
ondu
ctin
g th
e st
atis
tical
ana
lysi
s to
det
erm
ine
sign
ifica
nt d
iffer
ence
s (M
S).
Var
iety
den
oted
with
an
aste
risk
(***
) was
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0, 2
009
and
2008
.M
S=
Var
ietie
s w
ith a
ny M
S le
tter i
n co
mm
on a
re n
ot s
tatis
tical
ly d
iffer
ent a
t the
5%
leve
l of p
roba
bilit
y.D
ata
prov
ided
by
Rob
ert C
. Will
iam
s, E
xt. A
rea
Spe
cial
ist,
Gra
in C
rops
, and
the
exte
nsio
n ag
ents
in th
e co
untie
s sh
own
abov
e.
12
Tabl
e 7.
Yie
lds
† an
d di
seas
e ra
tings
§ o
f sev
en M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in 1
1 Te
nnes
se a
nd K
entu
cky
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts d
urin
g 20
11. CST
Avg
.
------
------
-- R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan
------
------
----
Yiel
dSp
raye
d ¶
Uns
pray
edSC
NM
SB
rand
/Var
iety
(n=1
1)M
oist
ure
‡SD
SFr
ogey
eA
nthr
acno
seYi
eld
Yiel
dR
ace
2R
ace
3R
ace
5bu
/a%
2009
/ 10
/ 20
1120
09 /
10 /
2011
2010
/ 11
bu/a
bu/a
2011
2011
2011
ATe
rral
RE
V-3
8R10
48.1
10.7
---
/
/ 0.
0
/ 4.
856
.050
.8S
RS
AB
Asg
row
AG
3831
GE
NR
R2Y
46.9
11.8
---
/
/ 0.8
/
4.3
50.7
49.1
SR
SA
BC
Dai
ryla
nd 3
805
RR
2Y45
.610
.4--
-
/
/
1.0
/
4.5
50.2
45.6
SR
HS
AB
C**
*NK
Bra
nd S
39-A
344
.510
.61.
7 / 0
.0 /
2.
3 / 7
.5 /
5.5
5.
3 / 5
.547
.739
.2S
RS
AB
CS
teye
r 340
2R2
GE
NR
R2Y
44.4
10.1
---
/
/ 0
.0
/ 4.
847
.044
.7S
RM
RB
CA
sgro
w A
G38
03R
R44
.111
.12.
3 / 0
.0 /
0.7
/ 2.0
/ 0.
8
3.3
/ 4.5
47.4
45.6
SR
SC
Ste
yer 3
102R
2 G
EN
RR
2Y42
.010
.8--
-
/
/
0.0
/
8.0
43.4
37.1
SM
RS
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)45
.110
.848
.944
.6†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
Moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.§
Dis
ease
ratin
gs fo
r SD
S, F
roge
ye L
eaf S
pot,
and
Ant
hrac
nose
are
from
0-1
0, w
here
0=n
o di
seas
e &
10=m
axim
um le
vel o
f dis
ease
or p
lant
dea
th.
SD
S =
Sud
den
Dea
th S
yndr
ome.
¶ S
pray
ed p
lots
at M
ilan
treat
ed w
ith H
eadl
ine
@ 6
oz.
/Acr
e +
0.25
% P
enet
rato
r Plu
s at
20
gpa
at R
3 gr
owth
sta
ge.
Dis
ease
ratin
gs c
ompi
led
by D
r. M
elvi
n N
ewm
an fr
om re
plic
ated
plo
ts a
t the
Res
earc
h an
d E
duca
tion
Cen
ter a
t Mila
n.S
CN
ratin
gs; H
S =
hig
hly
susc
eptib
le, S
= s
usce
ptib
le, M
S =
mod
erat
ely
susc
eptib
le, M
R =
mod
erat
ely
resi
stan
t R =
resi
stan
t. R
ace
2 (H
G T
ype
1.2.
5.7)
; Rac
e 3
(HG
Typ
e 5.
7); R
ace
5 (H
G T
ype
2.5.
7)S
CN
Gre
enho
use
Rat
ings
com
pile
d by
Dr.
Pat
Don
ald,
Res
earc
h P
lant
Pat
h., U
SD
A-A
RS
, Wes
t TN
RE
C.
MS
= V
arie
ties
with
one
or m
ore
lette
rs in
com
mon
are
not
sta
tistic
ally
diff
eren
t at t
he .0
5 le
vel o
f pro
babi
lity.
Var
iety
den
oted
with
an
aste
risk
(***
) was
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0, 2
009
& 2
008.
Dat
a pr
ovid
ed b
y R
ober
t C. W
illia
ms,
Ext
. Are
a S
peci
alis
t, G
rain
Cro
ps.
13
Tabl
e 8.
Ove
rall
aver
age
yiel
ds †
and
moi
stur
es o
f tw
o M
atur
ity G
roup
III R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
(n=1
1) a
nd R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
rs (n
=6) i
n Te
nnes
see
durin
g 20
11.
R
esea
rch
and
Ave
rage
s of
CST
& R
EC T
ests
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tria
ls E
duca
tion
Cen
ter T
rials
Avg
.A
vg.
Avg
.B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
bu/a
%bu
/a%
bu/a
%Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
38R
10 (R
R)
4612
4810
.744
12.6
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-380
5/R
2Y44
1146
10.4
4212
.5A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4511
.647
10.6
4312
.6†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
14
Table 9. Mean yields † of 37 Early Maturity Group IV (4.0 - 4.5) Roundup Ready soybean varietiesevaluated in seven environments in Tennessee during 2011.
Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=7) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. Non-Irr2 Ames ---------------------------------------bu/a------------------------------------------------
Steyer 4501 R2 (RR2Y/STS) 57 ± 1 80 85 39 69 40 32 56Croplan R2C 4541 (RR2Y) 56 ± 1 88 70 34 69 40 35 53USG 74H81 (RR) 55 ± 1 79 78 39 55 46 31 57Dairyland DST45-001/R2Y 55 ± 1 87 73 32 64 40 34 54Dairyland DST43-001/R2Y 55 ± 1 78 82 36 64 41 28 56Progeny 4510 RY (RR2Y) 54 ± 1 81 75 34 65 40 37 48Croplan R2C 4391 (RR2Y) 54 ± 1 74 78 32 61 36 33 61Armor 46-R42 (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 74 80 29 62 37 36 55Progeny 4211 RY (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 79 80 33 55 37 33 55Dyna-Gro 39RY43 (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 76 79 32 62 35 32 56Armor 44-R08 (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 73 79 28 62 37 33 59Armor 46-R64 (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 69 75 30 69 42 33 52Asgrow AG4531 GENRR2Y (STS) 53 ± 1 72 80 34 61 41 34 47USG 74B58 (RR/STS) 52 ± 1 75 67 30 65 39 35 56Schillinger Seed 458 RCS 52 ± 1 71 73 35 68 38 27 54Dyna-Gro V42N9RS 52 ± 1 73 77 29 68 34 29 53Asgrow AG4232 GENRR2Y (STS) 52 ± 1 69 73 31 68 36 33 53Dyna-Gro 31RY45 (RR2Y) 52 ± 1 76 70 31 59 41 33 52Caverndale Farms CF 436 RR2Yn 51 ± 1 67 76 32 58 37 33 57Dairyland DSR-4300 RR 51 ± 1 64 70 35 64 36 34 53Steyer 4430 RR (STS) 51 ± 1 73 67 31 62 32 34 58USG 74D41R (RR2Y) 50 ± 1 65 75 35 58 35 32 53Dairyland DSR-4242/R2Y 50 ± 1 70 69 31 63 39 28 51Beck's XL Brand 432NR (RR/STS) 50 ± 1 64 67 30 65 37 35 52Dyna-Gro 35X43 (RR) 50 ± 1 69 68 30 62 35 33 53Croplan R2C 4520 (RR2Y) 50 ± 1 71 69 34 59 31 33 53NK S 44-D5 Brand (RR) 50 ± 1 68 73 32 62 38 29 46Dairyland DST45-002/R2Y 50 ± 1 74 70 33 57 34 28 51USG 74F11R (RR2Y) 49 ± 1 65 70 28 62 36 29 54Terral-REV Brand 45R10 (RR) 49 ± 1 70 63 23 64 34 33 56Delta Grow 4460 RR 48 ± 1 63 60 35 61 37 29 50Dairyland DSR-4500 RR/STS 47 ± 1 60 67 30 64 33 32 45Terral-REV Brand 44R22 (RR) 46 ± 1 60 63 28 54 35 31 52TN Exp TN09-45,432 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 58 67 31 53 31 35 45TN Exp TN09-46,551 (RR2Y) 43 ± 1 50 67 32 56 31 30 37TN Exp TN09-47,387 (RR2Y) 43 ± 1 55 63 32 40 36 31 44TN Exp TN09-47,024 (RR2Y) 39 ± 1 51 58 28 37 29 29 40Average (bu/a) 51 70 71 32 61 36 32 52L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 3 12 9 6 7 7 4 7C.V. (%) 9.3 10.0 8.0 12.1 7.3 11.0 7.6 7.7† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.
15
Tabl
e 10
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
37
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.0
- 4.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in s
even
env
ironm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=7
)(n
=7)
(n=3
)(n
=6)
(n=6
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
Ste
yer
4501
R2
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
57 ±
113
.52.
039
128
1.0
1.8
39.8
22.0
3.2
Cro
plan
R2C
454
1 (R
R2Y
)56
± 1
13.3
2.5
4012
81.
02.
237
.523
.11.
0U
SG
74H
81 (R
R)
55 ±
113
.32.
442
128
1.0
2.5
40.3
22.1
1.0
Dai
ryla
ndD
ST4
5-00
1/R
2Y55
± 1
13.5
1.8
4012
81.
02.
837
.523
.21.
0D
airy
land
DS
T43-
001/
R2Y
55 ±
113
.22.
141
127
1.0
2.5
40.5
22.1
1.3
Pro
geny
4510
RY
(RR
2Y)
54 ±
112
.92.
340
128
1.0
2.0
39.6
22.1
3.3
Cro
plan
R2C
439
1 (R
R2Y
)54
± 1
12.6
2.3
3712
51.
02.
838
.723
.01.
2A
rmor
46-R
42 (R
R2Y
)53
± 1
13.2
1.3
3712
51.
02.
038
.823
.01.
5P
roge
ny42
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)53
± 1
12.9
2.2
3712
51.
02.
539
.123
.12.
0D
yna-
Gro
39R
Y43
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
113
.22.
336
125
1.0
2.7
39.3
22.8
2.7
Arm
or44
-R08
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
113
.02.
136
125
1.0
1.8
39.1
22.9
2.0
Arm
or46
-R64
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
113
.72.
239
128
1.0
2.5
37.5
22.8
1.0
Asg
row
AG
4531
GE
NR
R2Y
(STS
)53
± 1
13.8
1.9
3912
81.
02.
340
.221
.72.
7U
SG
74B
58 (R
R/S
TS)
52 ±
112
.41.
535
124
1.0
2.5
39.0
23.1
1.2
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
458
RC
S52
± 1
13.2
1.9
3912
81.
02.
340
.422
.11.
3D
yna-
Gro
V42
N9R
S52
± 1
12.8
2.0
3712
41.
03.
238
.323
.41.
2A
sgro
wA
G42
32 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
52 ±
112
.62.
039
124
1.0
2.3
38.6
22.4
1.5
Dyn
a-G
ro31
RY
45 (R
R2Y
)52
± 1
12.8
2.3
3912
71.
02.
337
.023
.31.
0C
aver
ndal
e Fa
rms
CF
436
RR
2Yn
51 ±
113
.12.
335
125
1.0
2.8
39.2
22.9
1.2
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-430
0 R
R51
± 1
12.3
2.8
3912
41.
02.
540
.222
.62.
8S
teye
r44
30 R
R (S
TS)
51 ±
112
.32.
336
125
1.0
1.8
39.2
22.8
1.0
US
G74
D41
R (R
R2Y
)50
± 1
13.3
2.4
3612
71.
02.
040
.821
.11.
2D
airy
land
DS
R-4
242/
R2Y
50 ±
112
.72.
040
127
1.0
2.7
40.2
21.7
2.2
Bec
k's
XL
Bra
nd43
2NR
(RR
/STS
)50
± 1
12.7
1.8
3512
41.
02.
039
.622
.61.
2D
yna-
Gro
35X
43 (R
R)
50 ±
113
.02.
838
124
1.0
2.5
40.2
22.8
2.2
Cro
plan
R2C
452
0 (R
R2Y
)50
± 1
12.6
1.3
3612
61.
01.
738
.223
.21.
5N
KS
44-
D5
Bra
nd (R
R)
50 ±
112
.61.
937
127
1.0
2.0
40.4
21.7
2.5
Dai
ryla
ndD
ST4
5-00
2/R
2Y50
± 1
13.5
1.9
4112
81.
01.
840
.622
.02.
3U
SG
74F1
1R (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
11.9
1.9
3912
31.
02.
338
.822
.41.
2Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
45R
10 (R
R)
49 ±
113
.52.
143
124
1.0
2.0
39.6
22.9
1.3
Del
ta G
row
4460
RR
48 ±
112
.42.
341
127
1.0
2.2
39.1
22.5
1.3
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-450
0 R
R/S
TS47
± 1
12.8
2.9
4012
71.
02.
239
.023
.02.
5Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
44R
22 (R
R)
46 ±
112
.12.
238
126
1.0
1.8
41.2
22.2
1.0
TN E
xpTN
09-4
5,43
2 (R
R2Y
)46
± 1
14.7
2.1
3812
91.
02.
037
.921
.91.
0TN
Exp
TN09
-46,
551
(RR
2Y)
43 ±
115
.83.
146
129
1.0
2.8
38.2
22.5
1.0
TN E
xpTN
09-4
7,38
7 (R
R2Y
)43
± 1
13.0
2.2
4112
71.
02.
839
.422
.01.
0TN
Exp
TN09
-47,
024
(RR
2Y)
39 ±
114
.42.
846
127
1.0
2.8
39.3
22.3
1.0
Ave
rag e
5113
.12.
239
126
1.0
2.3
39.2
22.5
1.6
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Lo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5=9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
2/11
.
16
Tabl
e 11
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 1
5 Ea
rly M
atur
ity G
roup
IV (4
.0 -
4.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
six
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
2) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
S
prin
gfie
ld
Mila
n
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
Kno
xvill
eIrr
.N
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.A
mes
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
bu/a
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--S
teye
r45
01 R
2 (R
R2Y
/STS
)53
± 1
7157
3667
3947
Pro
geny
4510
RY
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
176
5532
6641
46S
chill
inge
r See
d45
8 R
CS
51 ±
165
5036
6740
48N
KS
44-
D5
Bra
nd (R
R)
50 ±
167
5239
6139
44A
sgro
wA
G45
31 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
50 ±
165
5632
6542
42U
SG
74B
58 (R
R/S
TS)
50 ±
167
4834
6341
45D
yna-
Gro
V42
N9R
S50
± 1
6251
3266
3946
Ste
yer
4430
RR
(STS
)49
± 1
6547
3460
3750
Dyn
a-G
ro35
X43
(RR
)49
± 1
6249
3660
3946
Bec
k's
XL
Bra
nd43
2NR
(RR
/STS
)49
± 1
6045
3567
3945
Cro
plan
R2C
452
0 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
6247
3562
3747
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-430
0 R
R48
± 1
5850
3460
4147
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-450
0 R
R/S
TS47
± 1
6346
3360
3743
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd44
R22
(RR
)46
± 1
5545
3357
4048
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd45
R10
(RR
)46
± 1
6142
2762
3745
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)49
6449
3463
3946
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
39
79
75
6C
.V. (
%)
10.0
9.8
9.1
17.5
7.4
9.0
8.9
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
17
Tabl
e 12
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
15
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.0
- 4.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in s
ix e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
a fSe
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=7)
(n=1
1)(n
=10)
(n=5
)(n
=1)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
-- S
core
----
----
----
-%
%S
core
Ste
yer
4501
R2
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
53 ±
113
.21.
738
129
1.0
1.5
2.0
40.6
21.8
3.2
Pro
geny
4510
RY
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
113
.01.
839
129
1.0
1.2
2.2
40.4
21.9
3.3
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
458
RC
S51
± 1
12.5
1.6
4013
01.
02.
82.
641
.521
.81.
3N
KS
44-
D5
Bra
nd (R
R)
50 ±
112
.41.
637
128
1.0
1.5
2.1
40.8
22.0
2.5
Asg
row
AG
4531
GE
NR
R2Y
(STS
)50
± 1
13.8
1.6
3812
91.
02.
02.
741
.521
.52.
7U
SG
74B
58 (R
R/S
TS)
50 ±
112
.31.
434
126
1.0
1.2
2.7
40.3
22.7
1.2
Dyn
a-G
roV
42N
9RS
50 ±
112
.81.
537
125
1.1
1.2
3.3
39.6
23.1
1.2
Ste
yer
4430
RR
(STS
)49
± 1
12.1
1.8
3612
61.
01.
52.
340
.522
.51.
0D
yna-
Gro
35X
43 (R
R)
49 ±
112
.42.
239
125
1.0
1.2
2.5
40.7
22.9
2.2
Bec
k's
XL
Bra
nd43
2NR
(RR
/STS
)49
± 1
12.3
1.5
3412
51.
01.
72.
840
.722
.31.
2C
ropl
anR
2C 4
520
(RR
2Y)
49 ±
112
.31.
136
126
1.0
1.0
2.0
39.2
23.0
1.5
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-430
0 R
R48
± 1
11.9
2.3
3912
51.
01.
02.
540
.322
.92.
8D
airy
land
DS
R-4
500
RR
/STS
47 ±
112
.92.
541
129
1.1
1.7
2.4
39.8
23.0
2.5
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd44
R22
(RR
)46
± 1
12.3
1.7
3712
71.
01.
02.
241
.522
.21.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
45R
10 (R
R)
46 ±
112
.91.
743
126
1.1
1.7
2.6
40.6
22.7
1.3
Ave
rage
4912
.61.
738
127
1.0
1.5
2.5
40.5
22.4
1.9
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
2/11
.
18
Tabl
e 13
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of s
even
Ear
ly M
atur
ity G
roup
IV (4
.0 -
4.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
5) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r thr
ee y
ears
, 200
9 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Sprin
gfie
ld
Mila
n
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
5)K
noxv
ille
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Am
es
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---b
u/a-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-S
chill
inge
r See
d45
8 R
CS
55 ±
171
4166
4752
US
G74
B58
(RR
/STS
)55
± 1
7042
6548
48S
teye
r44
30 R
R (S
TS)
54 ±
169
4361
4554
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd45
R10
(RR
)51
± 1
6635
6245
48D
yna-
Gro
V42
N9R
S51
± 1
6539
6242
47D
airy
land
DS
R-4
300
RR
50 ±
163
4060
4544
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-450
0 R
R/S
TS49
± 1
6638
5841
43A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5267
4062
4548
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
38
87
67
C.V
. (%
)9.
78.
512
.58.
29.
610
.6†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
19
y
Tabl
e 14
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
sev
en E
arly
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.0
- 4.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=15)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
edSD
S±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
litPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eD
ID
SD
XB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
5)(n
=15)
(n=1
0)(n
=14)
(n=1
0)(n
=6)
(n=1
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
- Sco
re --
----
----
----
%%
Sco
re%
0 - 9
inde
xS
chill
inge
r See
d45
8 R
CS
55 ±
113
.41.
540
130
1.0
2.8
2.7
41.1
21.8
1.3
56.7
1.3
8.2
US
G74
B58
(RR
/STS
)55
± 1
13.3
1.5
3512
61.
01.
22.
639
.922
.81.
231
.71.
34.
7S
teye
r44
30 R
R (S
TS)
54 ±
113
.01.
535
126
1.0
1.5
2.3
40.0
22.7
1.0
17.0
1.0
1.9
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd45
R10
(RR
)51
± 1
13.8
1.8
4412
61.
11.
72.
440
.122
.71.
350
.01.
712
.2D
yna-
Gro
V42
N9R
S51
± 1
13.5
1.5
3612
51.
11.
23.
439
.223
.11.
230
.32.
09.
5D
airy
land
DS
R-4
300
RR
50 ±
113
.12.
340
125
1.0
1.0
2.6
40.1
22.8
2.8
48.3
1.7
10.2
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-450
0 R
R/S
TS49
± 1
13.7
2.4
4012
81.
11.
72.
439
.523
.02.
563
.32.
017
.0A
vera
ge52
13.4
1.8
3912
61.
01.
62.
640
.022
.71.
642
.51.
69.
1†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
2/11
.D
I = d
isea
se in
cide
nce
= pe
rcen
tage
of p
lant
s w
ith s
ympt
oms
DS
= d
isea
se s
ever
ity =
sco
re o
f lea
f chl
oros
is a
nd n
ecro
sis;
0 =
no
sym
ptom
s; 9
= p
lant
dea
th b
efor
e no
rmal
def
olia
tion
due
to s
enes
cenc
e.D
X =
dis
ease
inde
x =
(DI x
DS
/ 9)
; rat
ings
wer
e m
ade
at a
ppro
xim
atel
y R
6 w
hen
gree
n po
ds w
ith s
eed
have
reac
hed
full
size
at K
noxv
ille
on 8
/26/
09.
20
D
Tabl
e 15
. Yi
elds
† o
f 12
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.0
- 4.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s in
13
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts in
Ten
ness
eean
d K
entu
cky
durin
g 20
11.
REC
REC
atat
Mila
nM
ilan
Avg
.(K
Y)(K
Y)La
uder
dale
irrig
.irr
ig.
MS
Bra
nd/V
arie
tyYi
eld
Moi
st‡
Bal
lard
Cof
fee
Dye
rFu
lton
Gib
son
Hic
kman
Lake
fung
.no
fung
.fu
ng.
no fu
ng.O
bion
Wea
kley
bu/a
%7/
7 §
5/10
6/1
6/14
5/31
5/31
5/31
6/7
6/7
5/10
5/10
5/26
6/9
AA
rmor
46-
R64
RR
2Y55
.411
.855
.672
.866
.540
.447
.163
.534
.458
.455
.350
.650
.962
.162
.0A
BA
rmor
46-
R42
RR
2Y54
.510
.957
.872
.361
.140
.043
.061
.544
.956
.454
.751
.350
.263
.352
.5A
B*A
sgro
w A
G45
31 G
EN
RR
2Y54
.512
.258
.865
.260
.446
.041
.561
.541
.961
.858
.951
.344
.361
.055
.5A
BC
Pro
geny
451
0 R
Y/S
TS52
.812
.055
.659
.761
.443
.337
.660
.442
.962
.657
.747
.640
.258
.259
.8A
BC
**A
sgro
w A
G43
0352
.411
.348
.164
.763
.235
.745
.364
.943
.052
.348
.352
.251
.954
.457
.7B
CD
Dai
ryla
nd 4
300R
R51
.811
.051
.458
.060
.241
.337
.565
.338
.454
.851
.554
.641
.861
.857
.0B
CD
NK
Bra
nd S
44-D
551
.111
.750
.365
.156
.136
.434
.260
.145
.458
.453
.946
.240
.462
.755
.4C
DU
SG
74A
45 R
R50
.311
.748
.460
.859
.535
.031
.154
.147
.457
.449
.547
.946
.460
.856
.0C
DS
teye
r 443
0 R
R/S
TS49
.810
.944
.168
.453
.527
.434
.862
.234
.652
.056
.149
.051
.252
.861
.1C
DTe
rral
RE
V-4
4R22
49.7
11.4
52.5
45.4
58.4
44.6
34.5
54.2
34.2
57.3
54.9
47.9
46.8
57.8
58.0
DS
chill
inge
r 458
RC
S
49.2
12.3
46.1
65.3
57.5
35.4
32.1
61.3
44.5
46.6
47.4
47.6
37.4
52.6
65.6
EU
SG
74B
58 R
R/S
TS45
.511
.045
.568
.357
.021
.732
.560
.139
.136
.537
.239
.940
.155
.458
.5A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
51.4
11.5
51.2
63.8
59.6
37.3
37.6
60.8
40.9
54.5
52.1
48.8
45.1
58.6
58.3
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ M
oist
ure
at h
arve
st.
§ P
lant
ing
date
.E
ach
varie
ty w
as e
valu
ated
in a
larg
e st
rip-p
lot a
t eac
h lo
ctio
n, th
us e
ach
coun
ty te
st w
as c
onsi
dere
d as
one
repl
icat
ion
of
the
test
in c
alcu
latin
g th
e av
erag
e yi
eld
and
in c
ondu
ctin
g th
e st
atis
tical
ana
lysi
s to
det
erm
ine
sign
ifica
nt d
iffer
ence
s (M
S).
Var
iety
den
oted
with
an
aste
risk
(*) a
nd/o
r (**
) wer
e in
the
top
perfo
rmin
g gr
oup
in 2
010
and/
or 2
009,
resp
ectiv
ely.
MS
= V
arie
ties
with
any
MS
lette
r in
com
mon
are
not
sta
tistic
ally
diff
eren
t at t
he 5
% le
vel o
f pro
babi
lity.
Dat
a pr
ovid
ed b
y R
ober
t C. W
illia
ms,
Ext
. Are
a S
peci
alis
t, G
rain
Cro
ps, a
nd th
e ex
tens
ion
agen
ts in
the
coun
ties
show
n ab
ove.
21
e
Tabl
e 16
. Yi
elds
† a
nd d
isea
se ra
tings
§ o
f 12
early
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.0
- 4.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in 1
3 Te
nnes
see
and
Ken
tuck
y C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
dur
ing
2011
. C
STA
vg.
---
------
------
-- R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan
------
------
------
Yiel
dSp
raye
d ¶
Uns
pray
edSC
NM
SB
rand
/Var
iety
(n=1
3)M
oist
ure
‡SD
SFr
ogey
eA
nthr
acno
sYi
eld
Yiel
dR
ace
2R
ace
3R
ace
5bu
/a%
2009
/ 10
/ 20
1120
09 /
10 /
2011
2010
/ 11
bu/a
bu/a
2011
2011
2011
AA
rmor
46-
R64
RR
2Y55
.411
.8--
-
/
/
0.0
/
4.0
50.6
50.9
SM
RS
AB
Arm
or 4
6-R
42 R
R2Y
54.5
10.9
---
/
/ 4
.0
/ 3.
851
.350
.2S
RS
AB
*Asg
row
AG
4531
GE
NR
R2Y
54.5
12.2
/ 0
.0 /
/ 5
.8 /
5.5
3.
0 / 3
.551
.344
.3S
HS
SA
BC
Pro
geny
451
0 R
Y/S
TS52
.812
.0--
-
/
/
6.3
/
3.3
47.6
40.2
MS
MS
SA
BC
D**
Asg
row
AG
4303
52.4
11.3
0.
7 / 0
.0 /
0.
0 / 0
.3 /
0.3
2.
8 / 3
.552
.251
.9S
SS
BC
DD
airy
land
430
0RR
51.8
11.0
2.
0 / 0
.0 /
3.7
/ 6.3
/ 7.
3
4.0
/ 3.0
54.6
41.8
SS
MS
BC
DN
K B
rand
S44
-D5
51.1
11.7
/ 0
.0 /
/ 3.
3 / 4
.8
2.5
/ 3.0
46.2
40.4
MS
RM
SC
DU
SG
74A
45 R
R50
.311
.7--
-
/
/
3.0
/
3.0
47.9
46.4
SR
MS
CD
Ste
yer 4
430
RR
/STS
49.8
10.9
1.
0 / 0
.0 /
0.0
/ 0.0
/ 0.
8
4.0
/ 3.8
49.0
51.2
SM
RM
SC
DTe
rral
RE
V-4
4R22
49.7
11.4
---
/
/ 0
.0
/ 3.
047
.946
.8H
SR
SD
Sch
illin
ger 4
58R
CS
49
.212
.3
0.3
/ 0.0
/
2.
7 / 4
.0 /
5.8
3.
8 / 3
.047
.637
.4M
SR
SE
US
G 7
4B58
RR
/STS
45.5
11.0
0.
3 / 0
.0 /
0.0
/ 0.0
/ 0.
0
3.3
/ 3.5
39.9
40.1
MS
MS
SA
vera
ge (b
u/a)
51.4
11.5
48.8
45.1
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ M
oist
ure
at h
arve
st.
§ D
isea
se ra
tings
for S
DS
, Fro
geye
Lea
f Spo
t, an
d A
nthr
acno
se a
re fr
om 0
-10,
whe
re 0
=no
dise
ase
&
10
=max
imum
leve
l of d
isea
se o
r pla
nt d
eath
. S
DS
= S
udde
n D
eath
Syn
drom
e.¶
Spr
ayed
plo
ts a
t Mila
n tre
ated
with
Hea
dlin
e @
6 o
z./A
cre
+ 0.
25%
Pen
etra
tor P
lus
at 2
0 gp
a at
R3
grow
th s
tage
.D
isea
se ra
tings
com
pile
d by
Dr.
Mel
vin
New
man
from
repl
icat
ed p
lots
at t
he R
esea
rch
and
Edu
catio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan.
SC
N ra
tings
; HS
= h
ighl
y su
scep
tible
, S =
sus
cept
ible
, MS
= m
oder
atel
y su
scep
tible
, MR
= m
oder
atel
y re
sist
ant R
= re
sist
ant.
Rac
e 2
(HG
Typ
e 1.
2.5.
7); R
ace
3 (H
G T
ype
5.7)
; Rac
e 5
(HG
Typ
e 2.
5.7)
SC
N G
reen
hous
e R
atin
gs c
ompi
led
by D
r. P
at D
onal
d, R
esea
rch
Pla
nt P
ath.
, US
DA
-AR
S, W
est T
N R
EC
.M
S=
Var
ietie
s w
ith o
ne o
r mor
e le
tters
in c
omm
on a
re n
ot s
tatis
tical
ly d
iffer
ent a
t the
.05
leve
l of p
roba
bilit
y.V
arie
ties
deno
ted
with
an
aste
risk
(*) a
nd/o
r (**
) w
ere
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0 an
d/or
200
9, re
spec
tivel
y.D
ata
prov
ided
by
Rob
ert C
. Will
iam
s, E
xt. A
rea
Spe
cial
ist,
Gra
in C
rops
.
22
Tabl
e 17
. O
vera
ll av
erag
e yi
elds
† a
nd m
oist
ures
of 1
0 Ea
rly M
atur
ity G
roup
IV (4
.0 -
4.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts (n
=13)
and
Res
earc
h an
d Ed
ucat
ion
Cen
ters
(n=7
) in
Tenn
esse
e du
ring
2011
.
R
esea
rch
and
Ave
rage
s of
CST
& R
EC T
ests
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tria
ls
Edu
catio
n C
ente
r Tria
lsA
vg.
Avg
.A
vg.
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡Yi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
ebu
/a%
bu/a
%bu
/a%
Arm
or46
-R64
(RR
2Y)
5412
.855
11.8
5313
.7A
rmor
46-R
42 (R
R2Y
)54
12.0
5510
.953
13.2
Asg
row
AG
4531
GE
NR
R2Y
(STS
)54
13.0
5412
.253
13.8
Pro
geny
4510
RY
(RR
2Y)
5312
.553
12.0
5412
.9D
airy
land
DS
R-4
300
RR
5111
.652
11.0
5112
.3S
chill
inge
r See
d45
8 R
CS
5112
.749
12.3
5213
.2N
KS
44-
D5
Bra
nd (R
R)
5112
.151
11.7
5012
.6S
teye
r44
30 R
R (S
TS)
5011
.650
10.9
5112
.3U
SG
74B
58 (R
R/S
TS)
4911
.746
11.0
5212
.4Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
44R
22 (R
R)
4811
.850
11.4
4612
.1A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5112
.251
11.5
5212
.9†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
23
Table 18. Mean yields † of 69 Late Maturity Group IV (4.6 - 4.9) Roundup Ready soybean varieties evaluated in seven environments in Tennessee during 2011.
Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=7) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. Non-Irr. 2 Ames --------------------------------------bu/a----------------------------------------------
Morsoy Xtra 46X29 (RR2Y/STS) 49 ± 1 74 43 33 65 45 36 52Progeny 4611 RY (RR2Y) 49 ± 1 73 43 25 68 43 35 54Armor 48-R40 (RR2Y/STS) 49 ± 1 80 41 37 56 46 34 47Asgrow AG4632 GENRR2Y 48 ± 1 74 39 28 65 44 37 52Delta Grow 4670 R2Y 48 ± 1 79 36 33 66 41 32 52Morsoy Xtra 47X31 (RR2Y) 48 ± 1 70 42 34 67 42 31 50Beck's XL Brand 477NR (RR) 48 ± 1 68 39 37 63 44 34 50Progeny 4710 RY (RR2Y) 48 ± 1 68 42 35 60 45 38 45Progeny 4908 RR 48 ± 1 61 53 36 60 40 38 45Dairyland DST47-002/R2Y 48 ± 1 65 43 34 68 41 34 48Terral-REV Brand 48R33 (RR) 47 ± 1 69 43 31 66 40 33 50Asgrow AG4730 GENRR2Y (STS) 47 ± 1 72 41 34 58 43 33 49Dairyland DSR-4810 RR 47 ± 1 73 41 32 59 43 32 52Morsoy Xtra 46X71 (RR2Y) 47 ± 1 77 38 34 64 38 32 47Armor X1209 (RR2Y/STS) 47 ± 1 67 37 28 72 42 34 49Caverndale Farms CF 476 RR2Yn 47 ± 1 71 45 34 58 38 31 52USG 74A79R (RR2Y/STS) 47 ± 1 66 38 31 62 41 37 52Armor 48-R91 (RR2Y/STS) 47 ± 1 65 39 35 64 41 34 49Morsoy Xtra 49X10 (RR2Y) 47 ± 1 63 37 33 59 46 39 50Dyna-Gro 33RY47 (RR2Y) 47 ± 1 67 43 30 62 44 31 50Delta Grow 4875 R2Y 47 ± 1 69 43 27 65 39 33 50Asgrow AG4832 GENRR2Y 47 ± 1 66 44 34 64 39 31 49Steyer 4701 R2 (RR2Y) 47 ± 1 74 37 31 62 39 30 54Dyna-Gro 39D48 (RR) 47 ± 1 71 36 32 60 39 33 53Croplan R2C 4801 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 68 40 28 65 41 34 50Progeny 4811 RY (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 66 37 33 64 42 35 49Asgrow AG4732 GENRR2Y 46 ± 1 76 37 36 55 38 33 51Hornbeck HBK RY 4620 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 70 42 31 64 38 32 47Armor X1211 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 61 37 34 58 46 40 46Morsoy Xtra 48X00 (RR2Y/STS) 46 ± 1 67 39 36 55 37 34 53Dyna-Gro 37RY47 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 69 37 32 61 44 34 46TN Exp TN09-48,552 (RR2Y) 46 ± 1 59 40 34 59 38 43 49Terral-REV Brand 47R53 (RR) 46 ± 1 64 40 36 56 38 32 55Dairyland DSR-8482 RR 46 ± 1 58 39 36 59 39 38 51Armor X1247 (RR2Y/STS) 45 ± 1 64 37 34 58 42 33 51MO Exp S08-14087 (RR) 45 ± 1 63 45 30 60 36 35 48Delta Grow 4880 RR 45 ± 1 67 43 32 50 44 30 50Schillinger Seed 495 RC 44 ± 1 59 42 35 61 37 35 43Terral-REV Brand 48R21 (RR) 44 ± 1 69 41 30 50 39 33 50Terral-REV Brand 49R43 (RR) 44 ± 1 59 37 34 62 40 31 46Terral-REV Brand 48R10 (RR) 44 ± 1 66 41 32 57 37 29 49Terral-REV Brand 49R22 (RR) 44 ± 1 64 39 32 58 40 33 43NK S 49-A5 Brand (RR) 44 ± 1 69 30 34 54 39 36 46Delta Grow 4770 RR 44 ± 1 60 38 27 62 35 33 53Terral-REV Brand 49R11 (RR) 44 ± 1 61 34 29 58 41 30 54Armor X1210 (RR) 44 ± 1 62 37 32 54 40 30 52USG 74E88 (RR) 44 ± 1 59 40 30 59 36 29 53Progeny 4906 RR 44 ± 1 57 43 32 50 41 36 47Croplan RC 4877 RR 44 ± 1 61 39 26 59 37 36 46NK S 47-R3 Brand (RR) 43 ± 1 58 38 26 55 45 34 47USG 74A91 (RR) 43 ± 1 56 36 30 56 38 34 51Terral-REV Brand 47R22 (RR) 43 ± 1 63 39 31 61 34 27 46
24
Table 18 (continued)Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=7) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. Non-Irr. 2 Ames --------------------------------------bu/a----------------------------------------------
Beck's XL Brand 495NR 43 ± 1 53 38 33 63 37 34 44Asgrow AG4932 GENRR2Y 43 ± 1 67 41 26 58 34 30 44Terral-REV Brand 48R22 (RR) 43 ± 1 63 43 26 55 34 29 50Terral-REV Brand 49R10 (RR) 43 ± 1 61 40 34 53 38 34 40Hornbeck HBK R 4924 (RR) 43 ± 1 67 40 27 52 38 30 44NK S 46-A1 (RR2Y) 42 ± 1 62 37 30 49 36 33 50Schillinger Seed 478 RCS 42 ± 1 67 40 27 54 35 33 40TN Exp TN09-48,343 (RR2Y) 42 ± 1 55 37 34 57 35 33 43TN Exp TN09-46,128 (RR2Y) 42 ± 1 50 36 32 56 38 41 42Hornbeck HBK R 4829 (RR) 42 ± 1 64 38 29 55 35 29 46Schillinger Seed 4990 RC 42 ± 1 62 39 27 53 41 33 38Delta Grow 4970 RR 42 ± 1 54 44 35 54 35 33 37Steyer 4710 RR 41 ± 1 59 29 26 58 35 31 53Delta Grow 4975 RR 41 ± 1 55 38 31 55 33 30 48Progeny 4911 RY (RR2Y) 41 ± 1 50 38 39 48 41 36 38Hornbeck HBK R 4729 (RR) 40 ± 1 63 36 27 46 32 29 45Hornbeck HBK R 4830 (RR) 37 ± 1 49 42 25 55 32 25 34Average (bu/a) 45 65 39 32 59 39 33 48L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 3 10 9 7 7 5 4 7C.V. (%) 10.2 9.9 13.6 13.9 7.9 8.6 7.7 8.8† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.
25
Tabl
e 19
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
69
Late
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
even
env
ironm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
in 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Seed
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=7)
(n=7
)(n
=2)
(n=6
)(n
=6)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
-- S
core
----
----
%%
Sco
reM
orso
y X
tra46
X29
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
49 ±
112
.22.
035
132
1.0
2.5
39.1
22.1
3.0
Pro
geny
4611
RY
(RR
2Y)
49 ±
112
.21.
937
131
1.0
2.3
37.2
22.9
1.0
Arm
or48
-R40
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
49 ±
112
.02.
434
132
1.0
1.8
38.9
21.9
3.2
Asg
row
AG
4632
GE
NR
R2Y
48 ±
112
.42.
436
132
1.0
2.3
36.8
22.6
1.0
Del
ta G
row
4670
R2Y
48 ±
111
.72.
035
131
1.0
2.8
37.1
23.0
1.0
Mor
soy
Xtra
47X
31 (R
R2Y
)48
± 1
12.5
2.2
3913
31.
03.
538
.421
.81.
2B
eck'
s X
L B
rand
477N
R (R
R)
48 ±
112
.02.
741
130
1.0
2.5
38.5
22.8
1.0
Pro
geny
4710
RY
(RR
2Y)
48 ±
112
.31.
835
133
1.0
1.5
39.3
22.4
2.0
Pro
geny
4908
RR
48 ±
112
.82.
537
136
1.0
2.2
39.4
22.1
1.5
Dai
ryla
ndD
ST4
7-00
2/R
2Y48
± 1
12.2
2.3
3913
31.
02.
838
.721
.81.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
48R
33 (R
R)
47 ±
111
.92.
039
130
1.0
2.3
38.0
23.0
1.0
Asg
row
AG
4730
GE
NR
R2Y
(STS
)47
± 1
12.1
2.5
3412
91.
01.
539
.022
.41.
2D
airy
land
DS
R-4
810
RR
47 ±
112
.03.
037
132
1.0
2.5
40.4
21.9
1.0
Mor
soy
Xtra
46X
71 (R
R2Y
)47
± 1
11.9
2.1
3613
01.
02.
736
.622
.91.
0A
rmor
X12
09 (R
R2Y
/STS
)47
± 1
12.7
2.0
3713
31.
02.
338
.722
.61.
5C
aver
ndal
e Fa
rms
CF
476
RR
2Yn
47 ±
112
.22.
236
129
1.0
2.3
38.4
22.1
1.0
US
G74
A79
R (R
R2Y
/STS
)47
± 1
11.8
2.3
3513
11.
02.
238
.722
.43.
0A
rmor
48-R
91 (R
R2Y
/STS
)47
± 1
12.4
2.2
3913
21.
03.
038
.121
.81.
0M
orso
y X
tra49
X10
(RR
2Y)
47 ±
113
.02.
635
136
1.0
2.5
39.6
21.7
3.0
Dyn
a-G
ro33
RY
47 (R
R2Y
)47
± 1
12.2
2.2
3913
21.
03.
038
.121
.91.
8D
elta
Gro
w48
75 R
2Y47
± 1
12.2
2.7
3913
21.
03.
338
.421
.91.
3A
sgro
wA
G48
32 G
EN
RR
2Y47
± 1
12.7
1.9
3913
41.
02.
738
.722
.31.
3S
teye
r47
01 R
2 (R
R2Y
)47
± 1
12.0
1.7
3512
91.
02.
238
.022
.21.
0D
yna-
Gro
39D
48 (R
R)
47 ±
111
.92.
639
131
1.0
2.8
40.3
21.8
1.3
Cro
plan
R2C
480
1 (R
R2Y
)46
± 1
12.3
2.6
4013
21.
03.
338
.521
.91.
2P
roge
ny48
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)46
± 1
12.5
2.7
4013
31.
03.
038
.621
.81.
0A
sgro
wA
G47
32 G
EN
RR
2Y46
± 1
12.1
2.4
3913
21.
02.
838
.022
.41.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
Y 4
620
(RR
2Y)
46 ±
111
.92.
334
132
1.0
2.0
38.3
22.4
3.3
Arm
orX
1211
(RR
2Y)
46 ±
112
.82.
835
134
1.0
3.0
39.4
21.9
2.7
Mor
soy
Xtra
48X
00 (R
R2Y
/STS
)46
± 1
11.9
2.3
3413
31.
02.
538
.522
.62.
3D
yna-
Gro
37R
Y47
(RR
2Y)
46 ±
112
.12.
136
131
1.0
1.7
38.9
21.9
3.7
TN E
xpTN
09-4
8,55
2 (R
R2Y
)46
± 1
13.1
2.2
3513
51.
01.
737
.622
.01.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
47R
53 (R
R)
46 ±
111
.52.
836
132
1.0
2.5
39.4
23.7
1.0
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-848
2 R
R46
± 1
12.6
2.6
3713
51.
02.
039
.522
.02.
2A
rmor
X12
47 (R
R2Y
/STS
)45
± 1
12.3
2.4
3313
31.
02.
339
.421
.83.
2M
O E
xpS
08-1
4087
(RR
)45
± 1
12.1
2.2
3813
21.
02.
339
.222
.72.
0D
elta
Gro
w48
80 R
R45
± 1
11.9
3.6
3713
31.
02.
541
.621
.11.
0
26
Tabl
e 19
(con
tinue
d)A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=7
)(n
=7)
(n=2
)(n
=6)
(n=6
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
495
RC
44 ±
113
.03.
739
134
1.0
2.7
40.6
21.5
1.0
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R21
(RR
)44
± 1
11.7
1.8
3513
41.
02.
238
.123
.03.
7Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
43 (R
R)
44 ±
111
.43.
637
134
1.0
2.5
40.0
22.7
1.2
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R10
(RR
)44
± 1
11.8
2.0
3713
11.
02.
038
.322
.72.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
22 (R
R)
44 ±
111
.82.
440
131
1.0
1.5
39.8
21.2
1.5
NK
S 4
9-A
5 B
rand
(RR
)44
± 1
11.2
2.4
4113
21.
02.
538
.422
.81.
0D
elta
Gro
w47
70 R
R44
± 1
12.1
2.8
3812
71.
02.
239
.022
.32.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
11 (R
R)
44 ±
110
.91.
835
130
1.0
2.3
42.0
21.6
1.3
Arm
orX
1210
(RR
)44
± 1
12.2
3.7
3613
31.
01.
842
.121
.11.
0U
SG
74E
88 (R
R)
44 ±
111
.71.
739
129
1.0
2.2
38.6
24.0
2.3
Pro
geny
4906
RR
44 ±
113
.12.
337
135
1.0
2.0
40.1
21.8
1.8
Cro
plan
RC
487
7 R
R44
± 1
11.8
2.7
3813
31.
01.
838
.222
.81.
2N
KS
47-
R3
Bra
nd (R
R)
43 ±
112
.23.
438
135
1.0
2.7
41.1
21.0
1.0
US
G74
A91
(RR
)43
± 1
12.7
2.4
3913
41.
02.
239
.722
.02.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
47R
22 (R
R)
43 ±
111
.52.
539
130
1.0
1.7
40.2
21.7
1.0
Bec
k's
XL
Bra
nd49
5NR
43 ±
111
.43.
636
133
1.0
2.0
39.7
22.8
1.0
Asg
row
AG
4932
GE
NR
R2Y
43 ±
112
.12.
239
133
1.0
3.0
38.4
21.7
1.0
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R22
(RR
)43
± 1
11.2
2.5
3413
11.
02.
239
.121
.81.
3Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
10 (R
R)
43 ±
112
.13.
342
132
1.0
2.5
39.6
22.7
1.2
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
924
(RR
)43
± 1
13.3
2.8
4113
41.
01.
837
.922
.81.
0N
KS
46-
A1
(RR
2Y)
42 ±
111
.41.
836
129
1.0
1.8
39.9
21.8
2.3
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
478
RC
S42
± 1
12.2
2.3
3613
41.
02.
338
.521
.82.
0TN
Exp
TN09
-48,
343
(RR
2Y)
42 ±
112
.41.
532
133
1.0
1.5
39.6
21.3
2.7
TN E
xpTN
09-4
6,12
8 (R
R2Y
)42
± 1
12.6
1.7
3413
31.
01.
739
.421
.41.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
482
9 (R
R)
42 ±
112
.03.
136
134
1.0
2.0
41.3
21.6
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
4990
RC
42 ±
113
.42.
637
136
1.0
2.3
39.4
21.9
1.0
Del
ta G
row
4970
RR
42 ±
113
.63.
639
135
1.0
2.8
40.3
21.6
1.0
Ste
yer
4710
RR
41 ±
111
.32.
238
132
1.0
2.0
37.1
23.0
1.0
Del
ta G
row
4975
RR
41 ±
112
.42.
738
135
1.0
2.0
39.2
22.2
2.5
Pro
geny
4911
RY
(RR
2Y)
41 ±
112
.62.
841
133
1.0
1.8
40.3
21.3
1.7
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
729
(RR
)40
± 1
11.7
2.3
3413
21.
01.
840
.822
.03.
8H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
483
0 (R
R)
37 ±
112
.83.
439
133
1.0
1.5
37.5
22.8
1.2
Ave
rage
4512
.22.
537
132
1.0
2.3
39.1
22.2
1.6
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e >4
5°.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5=9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Pro
tein
& O
il on
dry
wei
ght b
asis
.M
atur
ity =
day
s af
ter p
lant
ing
(DA
P).
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.Fr
ogey
e =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
; 5 =
95%
+ o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts. R
atin
gs fr
om K
noxv
ille
on 9
/1/1
1.
27
Tabl
e 20
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 3
3 La
te M
atur
ity G
roup
IV (4
.6 -
4.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
six
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
2) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Sp
ringf
ield
M
ilan
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
2)K
noxv
ille
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Am
es
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--bu
/a--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Mor
soy
Xtra
46X
29 (R
R2Y
/STS
)51
± 1
7336
3765
4945
Arm
or48
-R40
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
50 ±
178
3640
5845
44D
airy
land
DS
R-4
810
RR
50 ±
175
3738
5843
50A
sgro
wA
G47
30 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
50 ±
173
3739
5944
48H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
492
4 (R
R)
50 ±
177
3637
6039
48P
roge
ny49
08 R
R50
± 1
6844
3960
4246
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-848
2 R
R49
± 1
6836
4061
4049
US
G74
A79
R (R
R2Y
/STS
)49
± 1
6734
3664
4349
Dyn
a-G
ro37
RY
47 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
7331
3761
4345
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
RY
462
0 (R
R2Y
)48
± 1
7336
3165
3947
Mor
soy
Xtra
49X
10 (R
R2Y
)48
± 1
6933
3361
4645
Mor
soy
Xtra
48X
00 (R
R2Y
/STS
)47
± 1
6836
3759
3847
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd49
R22
(RR
)47
± 1
7237
3657
4043
Arm
orX
1211
(RR
2Y)
47 ±
168
3434
5944
44N
KS
49-
A5
Bra
nd (R
R)
47 ±
172
3234
6140
45S
chill
inge
r See
d49
5 R
C47
± 1
6538
4055
3844
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
478
RC
S46
± 1
6934
3462
3842
Del
ta G
row
4880
RR
46 ±
166
3736
4943
46Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
47R
22 (R
R)
46 ±
169
3430
6240
43Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
10 (R
R)
46 ±
166
3636
5442
42U
SG
74A
91 (R
R)
46 ±
166
3236
5540
47Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
48R
22 (R
R)
46 ±
167
3731
5641
44N
KS
47-
R3
Bra
nd (R
R)
46 ±
166
3429
5843
46P
roge
ny49
06 R
R46
± 1
6336
3356
4245
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R21
(RR
)46
± 1
6835
3650
4144
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
4990
RC
46 ±
170
3629
5542
42Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
48R
10 (R
R)
45 ±
170
3630
5538
41D
elta
Gro
w47
70 R
R45
± 1
6133
3059
4146
Del
ta G
row
4970
RR
45 ±
163
4036
5339
38H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
482
9 (R
R)
45 ±
167
3435
5038
45Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
11 (R
R)
45 ±
160
3030
6044
44D
elta
Gro
w49
75 R
R44
± 1
6032
3458
3844
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
729
(RR
)43
± 1
6932
3247
3544
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)47
6835
3558
4145
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
310
68
75
6C
.V. (
%)
10.3
9.5
12.1
16.0
8.3
8.9
8.3
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
28
Tabl
e 21
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
33
Late
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
ix e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=6)
(n=1
1)(n
=8)
(n=5
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
-- S
core
----
----
----
-%
%S
core
Mor
soy
Xtra
46X
29 (R
R2Y
/STS
)51
± 1
12.2
1.6
3713
61.
01.
32.
640
.221
.93.
0A
rmor
48-R
40 (R
R2Y
/STS
)50
± 1
11.7
1.9
3613
61.
01.
22.
339
.921
.83.
2D
airy
land
DS
R-4
810
RR
50 ±
112
.02.
340
135
1.0
1.1
2.8
39.9
22.4
1.0
Asg
row
AG
4730
GE
NR
R2Y
(STS
)50
± 1
11.9
1.9
3613
41.
01.
52.
139
.522
.51.
2H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
492
4 (R
R)
50 ±
113
.72.
544
138
1.0
1.5
2.0
38.7
22.7
1.0
Pro
geny
4908
RR
50 ±
112
.52.
141
139
1.0
1.5
2.6
39.8
22.3
1.5
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-848
2 R
R49
± 1
12.5
2.3
4113
81.
11.
52.
539
.922
.22.
2U
SG
74A
79R
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
49 ±
111
.61.
937
136
1.0
1.3
2.6
39.7
22.3
3.0
Dyn
a-G
ro37
RY
47 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
12.2
1.6
3813
51.
01.
32.
440
.121
.83.
7H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
Y 4
620
(RR
2Y)
48 ±
112
.22.
036
137
1.0
1.3
2.6
39.6
22.3
3.3
Mor
soy
Xtra
49X
10 (R
R2Y
)48
± 1
13.2
2.0
3713
91.
01.
52.
839
.722
.03.
0M
orso
y X
tra48
X00
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
47 ±
112
.12.
036
137
1.0
1.3
2.9
39.7
22.5
2.3
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd49
R22
(RR
)47
± 1
12.0
1.8
4213
61.
01.
21.
840
.321
.31.
5A
rmor
X12
11 (R
R2Y
)47
± 1
12.7
2.1
3713
81.
01.
53.
239
.622
.12.
7N
KS
49-
A5
Bra
nd (R
R)
47 ±
111
.31.
944
137
1.0
1.4
2.8
38.3
23.2
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
495
RC
47 ±
114
.02.
942
137
1.0
1.1
2.9
41.3
21.3
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
478
RC
S46
± 1
13.3
1.9
3913
81.
01.
32.
538
.921
.92.
0D
elta
Gro
w48
80 R
R46
± 1
11.8
2.6
3913
61.
01.
22.
742
.021
.31.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
47R
22 (R
R)
46 ±
111
.21.
942
134
1.0
1.3
2.3
40.4
21.8
1.0
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd49
R10
(RR
)46
± 1
12.1
2.4
4613
71.
01.
02.
739
.723
.11.
2U
SG
74A
91 (R
R)
46 ±
112
.81.
840
139
1.0
1.3
2.5
39.8
22.5
2.0
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R22
(RR
)46
± 1
10.6
2.0
3813
51.
01.
02.
339
.622
.11.
3N
KS
47-
R3
Bra
nd (R
R)
46 ±
111
.82.
340
138
1.0
1.3
2.8
40.9
21.5
1.0
Pro
geny
4906
RR
46 ±
112
.91.
841
138
1.0
1.3
2.5
39.2
22.4
1.8
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R21
(RR
)46
± 1
12.0
1.5
3813
71.
01.
22.
338
.623
.13.
7S
chill
inge
r See
d49
90 R
C46
± 1
14.3
2.4
4013
91.
11.
32.
439
.921
.81.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
48R
10 (R
R)
45 ±
111
.81.
638
135
1.0
1.2
2.4
38.8
23.0
2.0
Del
ta G
row
4770
RR
45 ±
111
.92.
040
132
1.0
1.1
2.7
39.2
22.5
2.0
Del
ta G
row
4970
RR
45 ±
115
.03.
242
137
1.0
1.6
3.0
41.2
21.3
1.0
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
829
(RR
)45
± 1
12.4
2.6
3813
71.
01.
12.
441
.721
.61.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
11 (R
R)
45 ±
111
.11.
436
135
1.0
1.1
2.9
41.9
22.1
1.3
Del
ta G
row
4975
RR
44 ±
112
.81.
840
137
1.0
1.2
2.4
39.1
22.7
2.5
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
729
(RR
)43
± 1
12.1
2.1
3713
71.
01.
12.
241
.821
.73.
8A
vera
ge47
12.4
2.1
3913
71.
01.
32.
540
.022
.11.
9†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.M
atur
ity =
day
s af
ter p
lant
ing
(DA
P).
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 45
°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Pro
tein
& O
il on
dry
wei
ght b
asis
.S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Leaf
Ret
entio
n (a
t har
vest
) = 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
t har
vest
mat
urity
; 5=9
5+%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
and
gre
en s
tem
s at
har
vest
mat
urity
.S
eed
Qua
lity
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f see
ds s
how
ing
dise
ase
or s
plit
seed
coa
ts; 5
= 9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11
29
Table 22. Mean yields † of 15 Late Maturity Group IV (4.6 - 4.9) Roundup Ready soybean varietiesevaluated in five environments (n=15) in Tennessee for three years, 2009 - 2011.
Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=15) Knoxville Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. Ames --------------------------------------bu/a--------------------------------------
Armor 48-R40 (RR2Y/STS) 57 ± 1 80 44 63 51 46USG 74A79R (RR2Y/STS) 57 ± 1 73 44 67 50 49Hornbeck HBK R 4924 (RR) 56 ± 1 80 44 61 46 51Dairyland DSR-8482 RR 56 ± 1 71 45 65 45 54Dairyland DSR-4810 RR 56 ± 1 76 43 65 48 49Progeny 4908 RR 55 ± 1 70 45 63 48 49Progeny 4906 RR 53 ± 1 68 40 61 48 50USG 74A91 (RR) 53 ± 1 69 42 58 45 51Schillinger Seed 4990 RC 53 ± 1 71 38 59 48 47Delta Grow 4975 RR 52 ± 1 65 40 62 45 48Delta Grow 4970 RR 51 ± 1 65 43 55 46 45Terral-REV Brand 49R10 (RR) 50 ± 1 67 42 53 48 43Schillinger Seed 495 RC 50 ± 1 62 46 54 44 43Delta Grow 4770 RR 49 ± 1 67 35 59 40 46Hornbeck HBK R 4729 (RR) 48 ± 1 68 38 53 39 44Average (bu/a) 53 70 42 60 46 48L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 3 8 7 8 7 7C.V. (%) 9.7 8.1 11.7 9.2 10.3 9.9† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.
30
Tabl
e 23
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
15
Late
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=15)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
edSD
S±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
DI
DS
DX
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=15)
(n=1
5)(n
=10)
(n=1
4)(n
=8)
(n=6
)(n
=2)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
--- S
core
----
----
----
--%
%S
core
%0
- 9in
dex
Arm
or48
-R40
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
57 ±
112
.61.
838
135
1.0
1.2
2.4
39.7
21.9
3.2
20.3
1.0
4.5
US
G74
A79
R (R
R2Y
/STS
)57
± 1
12.3
1.8
3813
51.
01.
32.
639
.522
.33.
05.
01.
00.
7H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
492
4 (R
R)
56 ±
114
.22.
447
139
1.0
1.5
2.3
38.8
22.7
1.0
12.0
1.0
1.3
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-848
2 R
R56
± 1
13.3
2.2
4313
81.
11.
52.
739
.822
.22.
223
.31.
74.
3D
airy
land
DS
R-4
810
RR
56 ±
112
.92.
142
135
1.0
1.1
2.7
40.0
22.2
1.0
41.7
2.7
13.3
Pro
geny
4908
RR
55 ±
113
.12.
243
139
1.0
1.5
2.7
39.5
22.4
1.5
7.0
1.0
0.8
Pro
geny
4906
RR
53 ±
113
.31.
844
138
1.0
1.3
2.5
39.0
22.6
1.8
26.7
1.7
4.8
US
G74
A91
(RR
)53
± 1
13.1
1.9
4313
81.
01.
32.
539
.422
.52.
030
.31.
76.
7S
chill
inge
r See
d49
90 R
C53
± 1
14.5
2.1
4313
91.
11.
32.
639
.921
.91.
053
.32.
314
.4D
elta
Gro
w49
75 R
R52
± 1
13.7
1.8
4313
71.
01.
22.
738
.922
.72.
530
.02.
39.
2D
elta
Gro
w49
70 R
R51
± 1
15.7
2.7
4314
01.
01.
62.
940
.721
.51.
066
.73.
022
.6Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
49R
10 (R
R)
50 ±
112
.92.
747
137
1.0
1.0
2.7
39.9
22.9
1.2
53.3
2.0
11.9
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
495
RC
50 ±
114
.43.
045
138
1.0
1.1
2.9
41.1
21.5
1.0
73.3
4.0
32.9
Del
ta G
row
4770
RR
49 ±
112
.62.
042
132
1.0
1.1
2.7
39.1
22.4
2.0
56.7
2.3
14.8
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
729
(RR
)48
± 1
12.7
2.1
3913
71.
01.
12.
441
.721
.63.
866
.73.
022
.2A
vera
ge53
13.4
2.2
4313
71.
01.
32.
639
.822
.21.
937
.82.
011
.0†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
DI =
dis
ease
inci
denc
e =
perc
enta
ge o
f pla
nts
with
sym
ptom
sD
S =
dis
ease
sev
erity
= s
core
of l
eaf c
hlor
osis
and
nec
rosi
s; 0
= n
o sy
mpt
oms;
9 =
pla
nt d
eath
bef
ore
norm
al d
efol
iatio
n du
e to
sen
esce
nce.
DX
= d
isea
se in
dex
= (D
I x D
S /
9); r
atin
gs w
ere
mad
e at
app
roxi
mat
ely
R6
whe
n gr
een
pods
with
see
d ha
ve re
ache
d fu
ll si
ze a
t Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
6/09
.
31
Tabl
e 24
. Yi
elds
† o
f 19
Late
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
-4.9
) Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
in 2
0 C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
in T
enne
ssee
and
Ken
tuck
y du
ring
2011
.
REC
REC
atat
Mila
nM
ilan
Avg
.(K
Y)La
uder
dale
(KY)
irrig
.irr
ig.
MS
Bra
nd/V
arie
tyYi
eld
Moi
st‡
Cof
fee
Dye
rFay
ette
Fran
klin
Fulto
nG
ibso
nG
iles
Har
din
Hay
ww
odLa
kefu
ng.n
o fu
ng.M
adis
onM
ario
nM
cCra
cken
Mon
tgom
ery
fung
.no
fung
.Obi
onW
eakl
eybu
/a%
5/11
§
6/1
6/8
5/24
6/6
5/31
5/19
6/3
6/7
5/31
6/7
6/7
5/12
5/24
5/15
7/1
5/10
5/10
5/26
6/14
AA
rmor
48-
R91
RR
2Y/S
TS47
.412
.464
.063
.519
.543
.060
.231
.842
.018
.629
.641
.750
.249
.271
.143
.957
.449
.355
.949
.969
.038
.1A
BM
orso
y R
TS46
X29
RR
2Y/S
TS45
.511
.257
.064
.320
.233
.263
.838
.837
.614
.529
.744
.658
.354
.454
.739
.257
.350
.446
.641
.466
.338
.1A
B*S
chill
inge
r 499
0RC
45.1
12.5
57.8
62.8
16.7
31.1
59.4
41.9
37.9
24.7
33.2
50.8
52.8
54.4
45.9
38.4
57.0
47.7
52.2
47.3
57.0
33.5
BC
US
G 7
4A79
R R
R2Y
/STS
44.9
11.7
58.0
66.7
20.3
37.6
63.8
39.8
38.2
18.7
29.7
39.7
59.1
57.2
48.2
40.2
61.3
53.5
40.9
36.9
57.6
31.3
BC
DA
sgro
w A
G49
07 R
R44
.911
.658
.164
.222
.239
.663
.730
.634
.017
.631
.745
.955
.355
.851
.639
.256
.045
.647
.241
.967
.230
.2B
CD
EA
sgro
w A
G47
30 G
EN
RR
2Y/S
TS44
.711
.754
.062
.422
.530
.564
.133
.737
.721
.231
.442
.653
.254
.053
.434
.657
.949
.547
.043
.365
.434
.9B
CD
ETe
rral
RE
V-4
8R22
44.5
11.3
63.2
58.8
19.8
36.7
60.2
35.9
36.9
16.9
31.8
45.4
55.6
54.8
56.2
32.7
58.3
51.1
44.6
39.0
63.8
27.5
BC
DE
Dyn
a-G
ro V
47N
8RR
44.4
11.2
51.8
64.9
19.8
36.3
62.4
30.8
40.9
10.5
32.3
41.4
49.3
51.9
50.1
37.7
58.0
48.0
49.2
43.9
72.2
36.8
BC
DE
Arm
or 4
8-R
40 R
R2Y
/STS
44.3
11.5
55.9
64.0
19.7
32.2
63.5
31.8
37.2
15.0
32.9
44.5
53.9
51.0
54.9
35.4
65.1
47.7
46.7
39.4
63.6
31.1
BC
DE
FD
yna-
Gro
37R
Y47
GE
NR
R2Y
/STS
44.0
11.5
59.5
60.7
15.1
36.0
62.8
33.7
43.6
20.2
30.5
44.5
57.9
53.1
54.1
30.4
56.3
48.8
39.1
37.6
64.0
32.6
BC
DE
FTe
rral
RE
V-4
9R22
43.8
11.3
53.7
61.4
16.1
36.6
60.3
36.2
35.9
21.2
30.2
41.1
54.6
53.6
46.5
31.1
55.4
47.3
48.2
43.0
67.4
36.6
BC
DE
FH
ornb
eck
R49
2443
.513
.053
.962
.216
.139
.957
.236
.543
.814
.936
.135
.256
.451
.642
.849
.250
.645
.948
.441
.458
.130
.6C
DE
FGU
SG
74E
88 R
R/S
TS42
.711
.457
.260
.721
.934
.955
.336
.033
.925
.529
.545
.753
.950
.152
.424
.053
.542
.644
.540
.056
.735
.9C
DE
FGD
airy
land
481
0RR
42.7
11.8
57.6
60.9
19.3
32.0
61.8
30.5
43.4
16.4
29.4
39.6
51.9
47.9
52.2
28.3
54.7
46.7
47.3
44.2
65.5
24.4
CD
EFG
Dai
ryla
nd 8
482R
R42
.611
.948
.261
.625
.333
.560
.631
.737
.218
.732
.039
.950
.851
.646
.536
.854
.838
.845
.440
.760
.238
.2D
EFG
Dyn
a-G
ro V
48N
7RS
42.5
11.4
52.4
63.3
21.9
34.8
60.2
34.2
37.6
13.8
25.5
47.2
38.5
41.3
47.3
41.3
60.0
42.6
48.1
46.0
62.0
32.4
EFG
Sch
illin
ger 4
78R
CS
RR
/STS
42.4
12.3
61.4
63.7
16.7
37.1
53.2
31.4
41.0
17.9
27.5
39.1
52.4
49.4
46.4
31.5
54.8
44.6
40.4
36.5
68.5
35.0
FGP
roge
ny 4
908R
R41
.811
.548
.161
.315
.227
.760
.036
.741
.120
.729
.536
.652
.147
.743
.136
.353
.642
.350
.344
.661
.728
.2G
NK
Bra
nd S
49-A
540
.710
.941
.563
.314
.431
.059
.532
.733
.711
.033
.840
.549
.848
.341
.732
.856
.942
.847
.041
.661
.829
.8A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
43.8
11.7
55.4
62.6
19.1
34.9
60.6
34.5
38.6
17.8
30.9
42.4
52.9
51.4
50.5
35.9
56.8
46.6
46.8
42.0
63.6
32.9
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ M
oist
ure
at h
arve
st.
§ P
lant
ing
date
.E
ach
varie
ty w
as e
valu
ated
in a
larg
e st
rip-p
lot a
t eac
h lo
ctio
n, th
us e
ach
coun
ty te
st w
as c
onsi
dere
d as
one
repl
icat
ion
of
the
test
in c
alcu
latin
g th
e av
erag
e yi
eld
and
in c
ondu
ctin
g th
e st
atis
tical
ana
lysi
s to
det
erm
ine
sign
ifica
nt d
iffer
ence
s (M
S).
Var
iety
den
oted
with
an
aste
risk
(*) w
as in
the
top
perfo
rmin
g gr
oup
in 2
010.
MS
= V
arie
ties
with
any
MS
lette
r in
com
mon
are
not
sta
tistic
ally
diff
eren
t at t
he 5
% le
vel o
f pro
babi
lity.
Dat
a pr
ovid
ed b
y R
ober
t C. W
illia
ms,
Ext
. Are
a S
peci
alis
t, G
rain
Cro
ps, a
nd th
e ex
tens
ion
agen
ts in
the
coun
ties
show
n ab
ove.
32
Tabl
e 25
. Yi
elds
† a
nd d
isea
se ra
tings
§ o
f 19
late
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in 2
0 Te
nnes
see
and
Ken
tuck
yC
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
dur
ing
2011
. CST
Avg
.
--
------
------
------
--- R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan
------
------
------
------
-Yi
eld
Stem
Spra
yed
¶U
nspr
ayed
SCN
MS
Bra
nd/V
arie
t y(n
=20)
Moi
stur
e ‡
SDS
Frog
eye
Ant
hrac
nose
Can
ker
Yiel
dYi
eld
Rac
e 2
Rac
e 3
Rac
e 5
bu/a
%20
09 /
10 /
2011
2009
/ 10
/ 20
1120
10 /
1120
10 /
11bu
/abu
/a20
1120
1120
11A
Arm
or 4
8-R
91 R
R2Y
/STS
47.4
12.4
---
/
0.0
/
3.8
/ 0
.055
.949
.9S
RS
AB
Mor
soy
RTS
46X
29 R
R2Y
/STS
45.5
11.2
---
/
5.5
/
4.3
/ 3
.046
.641
.4S
HS
MS
AB
*Sch
illin
ger 4
990R
C45
.112
.5 /
0.0
/
/
0.0
/ 0.
0
2.3
/ 2.
8
0.0
/ 0.0
52.2
47.3
SR
MS
BC
US
G 7
4A79
R R
R2Y
/STS
44.9
11.7
---
/ 4.8
/
3.3
/ 2
.340
.936
.9H
SH
SS
BC
DA
sgro
w A
G49
07 R
R44
.911
.6--
-
/ 7
.3
/ 3
.3
/ 0.0
47.2
41.9
SR
MS
BC
DE
Asg
row
AG
4730
GE
NR
R2Y
/STS
44.7
11.7
/ 0.
0 /
/ 4
.3 /
4.8
2.
3 / 4
.0
0.3
/ 0.0
47.0
43.3
SM
RS
BC
DE
Terr
al R
EV
-48R
2244
.511
.3--
-
/
4.3
/
3.3
/ 0
.044
.639
.0S
RS
BC
DE
Dyn
a-G
ro V
47N
8RR
44.4
11.2
---
/ 0.
3
/ 1
.5
/ 0.0
49.2
43..9
SR
SB
CD
EA
rmor
48-
R40
RR
2Y/S
TS44
.311
.5 /
0.0
/
/
7.0
/ 5.
8
2.0
/ 4.
8
0.5
/ 0.0
46.7
39.4
SS
SB
CD
EF
Dyn
a-G
ro 3
7RY
47 G
EN
RR
2Y/S
TS44
.011
.5
/ 0.0
/
/
6.5
/ 5.
3
3.0
/ 4.
8
0.0
/ 2.0
39.1
37.6
SR
SB
CD
EF
Terr
al R
EV
-49R
2243
.811
.3--
-
/
7.0
/
4.0
/ 0
.048
.243
.0M
SR
SB
CD
EF
Hor
nbec
k R
4924
43.5
13.0
---
/ 4.
5
/ 3
.0
/ 0.0
48.4
41.4
SR
SC
DE
FGU
SG
74E
88 R
R/S
TS42
.711
.4--
-
/
7.3
/
1.5
/ 0
.044
.540
.0S
RM
SC
DE
FGD
airy
land
481
0RR
42.7
11.8
/ 0
.0 /
/ 0
.3 /
2.3
2
.8 /
4.0
0.
0 / 0
.047
.344
.2S
MS
SC
DE
FGD
airy
land
848
2RR
42.6
11.9
1.3
/ 0.
0 /
2.7
/ 5.
0 / 5
.8
2.0
/ 2.
0
0.0
/ 0.0
45.4
40.7
SS
MS
DE
FGD
yna-
Gro
V48
N7R
S42
.511
.4--
-
/ 0
.0
/ 4
.5
/ 0.0
48.1
46.0
HS
RS
EFG
Sch
illin
ger 4
78R
CS
RR
/STS
42.4
12.3
3
.3 /
0.0
/
5
.7 /
8.5
/ 7.0
2
.3 /
4.3
0.
0 / 0
.040
.436
.5M
SR
SFG
Pro
geny
490
8RR
41.8
11.5
1
.0 /
0.0
/
3
.7 /
5.5
/ 5.3
2
.5 /
3.0
0.
0 / 0
.050
.344
.6S
SS
GN
K B
rand
S49
-A5
40.7
10.9
/
0.0
/
/ 0.
0 / 0
.0
2.3
/ 2.
8
0.0
/ 0.0
47.0
41.6
SR
MS
Ave
rage
(bu/
a )43
.811
.746
.841
.9†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
Moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.§
Dis
ease
ratin
gs fo
r SD
S, F
roge
ye L
eaf S
pot,
Ant
hrac
nose
and
Ste
m C
anke
r are
from
0-1
0, w
here
0=n
o di
seas
e &
10=m
axim
um le
vel o
f dis
ease
or p
lant
dea
th.
SD
S =
Sud
den
Dea
th S
yndr
ome.
¶ S
pray
ed p
lots
at M
ilan
treat
ed w
ith H
eadl
ine
@ 6
oz.
/Acr
e +
0.25
% P
enet
rato
r Plu
s at
20
gpa
at R
3 gr
owth
sta
ge.
Dis
ease
ratin
gs c
ompi
led
by D
r. M
elvi
n N
ewm
an fr
om re
plic
ated
plo
ts a
t the
Res
earc
h an
d E
duca
tion
Cen
ter a
t Mila
n.S
CN
ratin
gs; H
S =
hig
hly
susc
eptib
le, S
= s
usce
ptib
le, M
S =
mod
erat
ely
susc
eptib
le, M
R =
mod
erat
ely
resi
stan
t R =
resi
stan
t. R
ace
2 (H
G T
ype
1.2.
5.7)
; Rac
e 3
(HG
Typ
e 5.
7); R
ace
5 (H
G T
ype
2.5.
7)S
CN
Gre
enho
use
Rat
ings
com
pile
d by
Dr.
Pat
Don
ald,
Res
earc
h P
lant
Pat
h., U
SD
A-A
RS
, Wes
t TN
RE
C.
MS
= V
arie
ties
with
one
or m
ore
lette
rs in
com
mon
are
not
sta
tistic
ally
diff
eren
t at t
he .0
5 le
vel o
f pro
babi
lity.
Var
iety
den
oted
with
an
aste
risk
(*) w
as in
the
top
perfo
rmin
g gr
oup
in 2
010.
Dat
a pr
ovid
ed b
y R
ober
t C. W
illia
ms,
Ext
. Are
a S
peci
alis
t, G
rain
Cro
ps.
33
Tabl
e 26
. O
vera
ll av
erag
e yi
elds
† a
nd m
oist
ures
of 1
6 La
te M
atur
ity G
roup
IV (4
.6 -
4.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts (n
=20)
and
Res
earc
h an
d Ed
ucat
ion
Cen
ters
(n=7
) in
Tenn
esse
e du
ring
2011
.
Res
earc
h an
d A
vera
ges
of C
ST &
REC
Tes
ts C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
rials
E
duca
tion
Cen
ter T
rials
Avg
.A
vg.
Avg
.B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
Yiel
dM
oist
ure
bu/a
%bu
/a%
bu/a
%M
orso
y X
tra46
X29
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
4711
.746
11.2
4912
.2A
rmor
48-R
91 (R
R2Y
/STS
)47
12.4
4712
.447
12.4
Arm
or48
-R40
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
4711
.744
11.5
4912
.0U
SG
74A
79R
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
4611
.845
11.7
4711
.8A
sgro
wA
G47
30 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
4611
.945
11.7
4712
.1D
yna-
Gro
37R
Y47
(RR
2Y)
4511
.844
11.5
4612
.1P
roge
ny49
08 R
R45
12.1
4211
.548
12.8
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-481
0 R
R45
11.9
4311
.847
12.0
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR
-848
2 R
R44
12.3
4311
.946
12.6
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd49
R22
(RR
)44
11.6
4411
.344
11.8
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd48
R22
(RR
)44
11.2
4411
.343
11.2
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
4990
RC
4413
.045
12.5
4213
.4U
SG
74E
88 (R
R)
4311
.543
11.4
4411
.7H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
492
4 (R
R)
4313
.144
13.0
4313
.3N
KS
49-
A5
Bra
nd (R
R)
4211
.141
10.9
4411
.2S
chill
inge
r See
d47
8 R
CS
4212
.342
12.3
4212
.2A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
44.6
12.0
43.8
11.7
45.5
12.2
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
34
Table 27. Mean yields † of 47 Early Maturity Group V (5.0 - 5.5) Roundup Ready soybean varietiesevaluated in seven environments in Tennessee during 2011.
Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=7) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. Non-Irr2 Ames --------------------------------------bu/a----------------------------------------------
USG 75T40 (RR) 54 ± 1 67 56 59 63 46 40 48Terral-REV Brand 51R53 (RR) 54 ± 1 66 54 50 66 46 37 59Armor X1217 (RR2Y/STS) 54 ± 1 57 59 68 67 44 41 42Armor X1255 (RR2Y) 54 ± 1 59 61 63 67 42 40 43Schillinger Seed 5220 RC 53 ± 1 68 58 57 57 42 41 51Croplan RC 5007S (RR/STS) 53 ± 1 67 61 53 66 42 36 48Delta Grow 5565 R2Y 53 ± 1 67 52 63 65 38 38 46Armor X1215 (RR2Y) 53 ± 1 57 53 62 68 41 42 46Asgrow AG5532 GENRR2Y 52 ± 1 69 56 54 56 42 42 45Morsoy Xtra 54X41 (RR2Y) 52 ± 1 66 48 60 67 42 41 42Delta Grow 5275 R2Y 52 ± 1 55 58 53 72 46 37 43Armor 55-R22 (RR2Y) 52 ± 1 69 50 59 65 41 37 42Asgrow AG5232 GENRR2Y 52 ± 1 69 50 53 65 45 37 43Armor 53-R15 (RR2Y) 52 ± 1 71 49 48 65 43 37 48USG 7553nRS (RR2Y) 52 ± 1 63 55 59 63 44 34 44Delta Grow 5300 RR/STS 51 ± 1 59 47 62 64 43 38 47Armor X1213 (RR2Y) 51 ± 1 71 54 48 55 48 36 48Schillinger Seed 557 RC 51 ± 1 65 65 43 60 44 42 39USG 75B21R (RR2Y) 51 ± 1 69 59 47 63 41 36 43TN Exp TN09-46,277 (RR2Y) 51 ± 1 56 60 59 52 45 42 40Dyna-Gro 37RY52 (RR2Y) 51 ± 1 56 52 59 64 43 36 44Asgrow AG5332 GENRR2Y 50 ± 2 57 57 43 60 48 38 51Progeny 5330 RR 50 ± 1 65 52 50 56 41 39 49USG 75M49 (RR) 50 ± 1 56 48 60 65 40 38 42Progeny 5210 RY (RR2Y) 50 ± 1 57 57 56 61 38 37 43Armor X1253 (RR2Y) 50 ± 1 58 48 53 65 43 36 46Armor X1216 (RR2Y) 50 ± 1 63 52 46 56 42 37 51NK S 51-J3 (RR2Y) 49 ± 1 61 58 51 55 39 39 42Morsoy Xtra 51X31 (RR2Y) 49 ± 1 67 49 49 57 38 36 45Terral-REV Brand 55R21 (RR) 49 ± 1 54 57 50 56 45 39 39Progeny 5111 RY (RR2Y) 49 ± 1 64 52 45 61 41 35 42Delta Grow 5160 RR/STS 48 ± 1 61 51 50 48 44 35 51Dyna-Gro 35P53 (RR) 48 ± 1 63 49 53 50 39 38 47TN Exp TN09-48,205 (RR2Y) 48 ± 1 57 45 49 65 39 40 41Delta Grow 5555 RR 47 ± 1 65 49 44 49 43 37 45Terral-REV Brand 54R10 (RR) 47 ± 1 59 58 40 48 43 38 45USG 75J32 (RR) 47 ± 1 51 53 53 61 38 29 43Hornbeck HBK R 5525 (RR) 47 ± 1 66 47 51 58 31 35 39Hornbeck HBK R 5529 (RR) 46 ± 1 60 41 47 58 35 36 46Delta Grow 5280 RR 46 ± 1 62 51 49 47 35 35 41NK S 51-T8 Brand (RR) 46 ± 1 48 52 52 46 39 38 43USG 75T18 (RR) 45 ± 1 54 42 51 52 37 38 41Hornbeck HBK R 5226 (RR) 44 ± 1 50 53 52 42 35 35 41Progeny 5321 RY (RR2Y) 44 ± 1 44 55 47 52 34 36 39Morsoy Xtra 53X51 (RR2Y) 44 ± 1 49 54 48 51 30 34 41USG 75R31R (RR2Y) 43 ± 1 49 43 50 50 40 33 37Delta Grow 5545 RR 43 ± 1 49 54 47 44 31 30 43Average (bu/a) 49 60 53 52 58 41 37 44L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 4 14 10 15 9 7 5 6C.V. (%) 12.6 14.7 11.3 18.3 9.3 10.4 7.5 8.3† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.
35
Tabl
e 28
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
47
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.0
- 5.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in s
even
env
ironm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=7
)(n
=7)
(n=4
)(n
=6)
(n=6
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
US
G75
T40
(RR
)54
± 1
12.6
1.5
3914
01.
01.
337
.722
.21.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
51R
53 (R
R)
54 ±
112
.01.
840
137
1.0
2.5
40.3
22.7
3.0
Arm
orX
1217
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
54 ±
112
.71.
739
138
1.0
1.8
37.8
23.0
1.3
Arm
orX
1255
(RR
2Y)
54 ±
112
.92.
139
141
1.0
1.8
39.1
21.5
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
5220
RC
53 ±
112
.41.
742
138
1.0
3.0
41.3
21.7
1.2
Cro
plan
RC
500
7S (R
R/S
TS)
53 ±
112
.22.
340
138
1.0
1.8
38.4
22.0
1.8
Del
ta G
row
5565
R2Y
53 ±
112
.51.
938
141
1.0
1.7
38.9
21.7
1.0
Arm
orX
1215
(RR
2Y)
53 ±
114
.42.
540
142
1.0
2.0
40.3
21.5
1.0
Asg
row
AG
5532
GE
NR
R2Y
52 ±
111
.91.
740
138
1.0
2.0
39.6
21.7
3.5
Mor
soy
Xtra
54X
41 (R
R2Y
)52
± 1
12.5
1.8
3914
21.
01.
838
.621
.81.
0D
elta
Gro
w52
75 R
2Y52
± 1
13.1
2.8
3813
81.
02.
038
.522
.21.
0A
rmor
55-R
22 (R
R2Y
)52
± 1
12.5
1.7
4014
01.
01.
738
.921
.81.
2A
sgro
wA
G52
32 G
EN
RR
2Y52
± 1
12.2
1.9
3713
71.
02.
038
.322
.51.
0A
rmor
53-R
15 (R
R2Y
)52
± 1
13.4
2.5
3713
81.
02.
238
.422
.41.
0U
SG
7553
nRS
(RR
2Y)
52 ±
112
.12.
139
139
1.0
1.8
39.3
21.7
1.2
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
51 ±
112
.02.
039
138
1.0
1.8
38.8
22.1
1.3
Arm
orX
1213
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
113
.62.
837
139
1.0
1.7
39.7
21.9
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
557
RC
51 ±
112
.01.
638
140
1.0
1.8
40.2
21.5
1.0
US
G75
B21
R (R
R2Y
)51
± 1
12.6
2.2
4113
61.
02.
338
.622
.61.
0TN
Exp
TN09
-46,
277
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
115
.52.
540
142
1.0
1.7
38.2
22.2
1.0
Dyn
a-G
ro37
RY
52 (R
R2Y
)51
± 1
12.6
2.2
3913
81.
01.
838
.022
.41.
0A
sgro
wA
G53
32 G
EN
RR
2Y50
± 2
12.2
3.1
3913
91.
03.
239
.921
.51.
0P
roge
ny53
30 R
R50
± 1
12.6
2.5
4013
81.
01.
839
.422
.31.
0U
SG
75M
49 (R
R)
50 ±
113
.22.
538
139
1.0
1.7
40.1
22.5
1.0
Pro
geny
5210
RY
(RR
2Y)
50 ±
113
.02.
539
138
1.0
1.8
38.1
22.5
1.0
Arm
orX
1253
(RR
2Y)
50 ±
113
.22.
438
138
1.0
1.7
38.6
22.3
1.2
Arm
orX
1216
(RR
2Y)
50 ±
112
.81.
837
136
1.0
1.5
40.1
21.7
2.7
NK
S 5
1-J3
(RR
2Y)
49 ±
112
.21.
337
135
1.0
2.0
38.5
22.5
1.0
Mor
soy
Xtra
51X
31 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
12.3
2.2
4213
61.
02.
038
.322
.71.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
55R
21 (R
R)
49 ±
112
.82.
241
142
1.0
1.8
39.9
22.0
1.0
Pro
geny
5111
RY
(RR
2Y)
49 ±
112
.41.
940
136
1.0
2.2
38.3
22.7
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5160
RR
/STS
48 ±
112
.53.
041
136
1.0
2.5
40.1
22.2
2.8
Dyn
a-G
ro35
P53
(RR
)48
± 1
12.0
2.8
4114
01.
01.
740
.221
.31.
3TN
Exp
TN09
-48,
205
(RR
2Y)
48 ±
112
.51.
839
141
1.0
1.8
38.3
21.9
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5555
RR
47 ±
112
.32.
739
141
1.0
1.8
40.0
21.6
1.7
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd54
R10
(RR
)47
± 1
11.9
3.1
4213
91.
01.
840
.321
.31.
0U
SG
75J3
2 (R
R)
47 ±
112
.31.
537
138
1.0
2.3
39.7
21.7
1.0
36
Tabl
e 28
(con
tinue
d)A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=7
)(n
=7)
(n=4
)(n
=6)
(n=6
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)47
± 1
13.3
2.0
3714
01.
01.
738
.822
.31.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
552
9 (R
R)
46 ±
112
.42.
236
139
1.0
1.8
39.8
22.6
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5280
RR
46 ±
113
.62.
639
140
1.0
1.3
39.6
22.2
1.0
NK
S 5
1-T8
Bra
nd (R
R)
46 ±
112
.12.
044
137
1.0
4.0
41.4
21.4
2.0
US
G75
T18
(RR
)45
± 1
12.7
2.7
3713
51.
01.
737
.923
.01.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
522
6 (R
R)
44 ±
112
.93.
038
139
1.0
2.2
39.8
22.1
1.2
Pro
geny
5321
RY
(RR
2Y)
44 ±
112
.22.
548
137
1.0
2.2
41.3
21.6
1.0
Mor
soy
Xtra
53X
51 (R
R2Y
)44
± 1
12.4
3.0
3914
11.
01.
540
.921
.12.
8U
SG
75R
31R
(RR
2Y)
43 ±
112
.62.
847
137
1.0
2.0
41.7
21.3
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5545
RR
43 ±
112
.82.
938
140
1.0
1.8
40.6
21.9
1.2
Ave
rage
4912
.72.
339
139
1.0
2.0
39.4
22.0
1.3
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle
>45°
. M
atur
ity =
day
s af
ter p
lant
ing
(DA
P).
Sha
tterin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= n
o sh
atte
ring;
5 =
90+
% o
f pod
s sh
atte
red.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5=9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Pro
tein
& O
il on
dry
wei
ght b
asis
.Fr
ogey
e =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
; 5 =
95%
+ o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts. R
atin
gs fr
om K
noxv
ille
on 9
/1/1
1.
37
Tabl
e 29
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 2
2 Ea
rly M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.0 -
5.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
six
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
2) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Spr
ingf
ield
Mila
n
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
2)K
noxv
ille
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Am
es
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--bu
/a--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
US
G75
T40
(RR
)49
± 1
6842
3958
4441
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
557
RC
48 ±
167
4732
5744
41A
rmor
53-R
15 (R
R2Y
)48
± 1
7337
3059
4346
US
G75
M49
(RR
)48
± 1
6438
3961
4144
Pro
geny
5330
RR
48 ±
168
4137
5539
45D
elta
Gro
w52
75 R
2Y48
± 1
5545
3469
4636
Cro
plan
RC
500
7S (R
R/S
TS)
47 ±
167
4634
6142
34D
yna-
Gro
37R
Y52
(RR
2Y)
47 ±
164
4035
6141
40D
yna-
Gro
35P
53 (R
R)
47 ±
169
3937
4940
47Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
55R
21 (R
R)
47 ±
162
4337
5443
42P
roge
ny52
10 R
Y (R
R2Y
)47
± 1
6741
3458
3942
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
47 ±
161
3841
6141
37D
elta
Gro
w55
55 R
R46
± 1
6942
3349
4045
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)46
± 1
6937
3858
3240
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
529
(RR
)44
± 1
6634
3153
3942
US
G75
J32
(RR
)44
± 1
5540
3757
3837
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
226
(RR
)44
± 1
6142
3846
3739
US
G75
T18
(RR
)43
± 1
6137
3450
3840
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd54
R10
(RR
)43
± 1
6543
3043
3839
Del
ta G
row
5160
RR
/STS
43 ±
161
3928
5139
40D
elta
Gro
w52
80 R
R42
± 1
6540
3442
3437
NK
S 5
1-T8
Bra
nd (R
R)
41 ±
155
4133
4436
39A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4664
4135
5440
41L.
S.D
. .05 (b
u/a)
411
710
86
8C
.V. (
%)
12.6
11.2
11.9
19.9
10.3
10.2
12.9
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
38
Tabl
e 30
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
22
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.0
- 5.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s
eval
uate
d in
six
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
2) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Leaf
Seed
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Ret
entio
nQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
2)(n
=12)
(n=6
)(n
=11)
(n=8
)(n
=6)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
----
Sco
re --
----
----
---
%%
Sco
reU
SG
75T4
0 (R
R)
49 ±
111
.71.
437
144
1.0
1.3
1.7
37.3
22.3
1.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
557
RC
48 ±
111
.41.
636
145
1.0
1.2
1.7
39.8
21.7
1.0
Arm
or53
-R15
(RR
2Y)
48 ±
111
.82.
336
143
1.0
1.1
2.1
38.1
22.6
1.0
US
G75
M49
(RR
)48
± 1
11.9
2.4
3614
31.
01.
42.
140
.322
.51.
0P
roge
ny53
30 R
R48
± 1
11.6
2.4
3914
31.
01.
31.
939
.222
.41.
0D
elta
Gro
w52
75 R
2Y48
± 1
11.6
2.4
3714
31.
01.
42.
839
.721
.71.
0C
ropl
anR
C 5
007S
(RR
/STS
)47
± 1
11.1
2.1
3714
31.
01.
01.
938
.122
.11.
8D
yna-
Gro
37R
Y52
(RR
2Y)
47 ±
111
.22.
137
143
1.0
1.3
1.8
37.6
22.7
1.0
Dyn
a-G
ro35
P53
(RR
)47
± 1
11.9
2.7
3914
41.
01.
01.
740
.221
.41.
3Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
55R
21 (R
R)
47 ±
112
.92.
239
146
1.0
1.3
1.8
39.7
22.0
1.0
Pro
geny
5210
RY
(RR
2Y)
47 ±
112
.02.
238
143
1.0
1.4
1.8
37.8
22.6
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
47 ±
110
.81.
938
143
1.0
1.2
1.8
38.3
22.2
1.3
Del
ta G
row
5555
RR
46 ±
112
.44.
440
145
1.0
1.1
1.8
40.1
21.5
1.7
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)46
± 1
13.3
1.9
3714
51.
01.
31.
939
.322
.41.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
552
9 (R
R)
44 ±
111
.72.
235
144
1.0
1.5
2.1
39.9
22.7
1.0
US
G75
J32
(RR
)44
± 1
10.9
1.4
3714
31.
01.
72.
340
.021
.51.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
522
6 (R
R)
44 ±
112
.52.
737
144
1.0
1.3
1.8
39.5
22.3
1.2
US
G75
T18
(RR
)43
± 1
11.2
2.4
3514
01.
01.
01.
737
.723
.01.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
54R
10 (R
R)
43 ±
111
.33.
040
144
1.0
1.2
1.9
39.8
21.4
1.0
Del
ta G
row
5160
RR
/STS
43 ±
111
.12.
841
141
1.0
1.3
3.1
40.0
22.7
2.8
Del
ta G
row
5280
RR
42 ±
113
.02.
737
145
1.0
1.7
1.8
39.6
22.3
1.0
NK
S 5
1-T8
Bra
nd (R
R)
41 ±
111
.12.
243
143
1.0
1.1
3.8
40.8
21.8
2.0
Ave
rage
4611
.72.
338
144
1.0
1.3
2.1
39.2
22.2
1.2
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
39
Tabl
e 31
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 1
0 Ea
rly M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.0 -
5.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
5) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r thr
ee y
ears
, 200
9 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Sprin
gfie
ld
M
ilan
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=15)
Kno
xvill
eN
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.A
mes
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-bu/
a---
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
US
G75
T40
(RR
)55
± 1
7047
6248
49U
SG
75M
49 (R
R)
54 ±
166
4566
4946
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
54 ±
160
4866
4846
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
557
RC
52 ±
164
4060
4845
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)50
± 1
6343
5940
44D
elta
Gro
w55
55 R
R49
± 1
6038
5546
49U
SG
75J3
2 (R
R)
49 ±
156
4261
4441
Del
ta G
row
5160
RR
/STS
49 ±
165
4058
4536
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
226
(RR
)46
± 1
5642
4842
42D
elta
Gro
w52
80 R
R43
± 1
5638
4637
40A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5062
4258
4544
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
411
109
79
C.V
. (%
)13
.012
.317
.010
.711
.314
.7†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
40
Tabl
e 32
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
10
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.0
- 5.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
sev
alua
ted
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=15)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
edSD
S±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
DI
DS
DX
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=15)
(n=1
5)(n
=11)
(n=1
4)(n
=10)
(n=6
)(n
=2)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
--- S
core
----
----
----
--%
%S
core
%0
- 9in
dex
US
G75
T40
(RR
)55
± 1
12.7
1.7
3714
71.
01.
51.
837
.622
.21.
013
.333
1.66
72.
8U
SG
75M
49 (R
R)
54 ±
112
.92.
136
146
1.0
1.8
2.2
40.3
22.5
1.0
66.7
2.3
17.4
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
54 ±
112
.11.
939
145
1.0
1.3
2.1
38.6
22.1
1.3
68.3
2.3
22.0
Sch
illin
ger S
eed
557
RC
52 ±
112
.61.
738
147
1.0
1.3
1.9
40.0
21.5
1.0
68.3
4.3
37.2
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)50
± 1
14.3
2.0
3714
71.
01.
52.
039
.322
.31.
071
.73.
330
.3D
elta
Gro
w55
55 R
R49
± 1
13.3
3.6
4014
61.
01.
21.
940
.021
.41.
776
.75.
356
.7U
SG
75J3
2 (R
R)
49 ±
112
.21.
438
144
1.0
2.3
2.4
40.0
21.4
1.0
56.7
2.3
21.9
Del
ta G
row
5160
RR
/STS
49 ±
112
.32.
544
141
1.0
1.7
3.4
40.1
22.9
2.8
56.7
1.8
11.5
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
226
(RR
)46
± 1
13.2
2.7
3714
51.
01.
52.
139
.722
.11.
210
0.0
5.0
55.6
Del
ta G
row
5280
RR
43 ±
113
.92.
737
146
1.0
2.3
2.1
40.0
22.2
1.0
93.3
5.0
52.6
Ave
rage
5013
.02.
238
145
1.0
1.7
2.2
39.6
22.1
1.3
67.2
3.4
30.8
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
DI =
dis
ease
inci
denc
e =
perc
enta
ge o
f pla
nts
with
sym
ptom
sD
S =
dis
ease
sev
erity
= s
core
of l
eaf c
hlor
osis
and
nec
rosi
s; 0
= n
o sy
mpt
oms;
9 =
pla
nt d
eath
bef
ore
norm
al d
efol
iatio
n du
e to
sen
esce
nce.
DX
= d
isea
se in
dex
= (D
I x D
S /
9); r
atin
gs w
ere
mad
e at
app
roxi
mat
ely
R6
whe
n gr
een
pods
with
see
d ha
ve re
ache
d fu
ll si
ze a
t Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
6/09
.
41
Tabl
e 33
. Yi
elds
† o
f 10
Early
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.0
- 5.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s in
15
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts in
Ten
ness
ee a
nd K
entu
cky
durin
g 20
11.
R
ECR
ECat
atM
ilan
Mila
nA
vg.
KY
Cro
cket
tLa
uder
dale
irrig
.irr
ig.
Shel
byM
SB
rand
/Var
iet y
Yiel
dM
oist
‡C
arlis
leC
offe
e(ir
rig.)
Fran
klin
Gib
son
Har
dem
anH
ayw
ood
Lake
fung
.no
fung
.fun
g.no
fung
.Obi
on(J
ohns
on)
(Tol
bert
)bu
/a%
6/21
§5/
106/
245/
245/
316/
36/
76/
96/
76/
75/
105/
106/
25/
196/
8A
Asg
row
AG
5332
GE
NR
R2Y
48.3
11.8
41.0
57.9
69.0
40.5
49.8
34.5
26.0
66.6
59.7
63.0
55.3
51.2
35.3
40.2
34.8
AB
*Mor
soy
RT5
429
RR
46.7
12.1
41.2
58.6
64.5
45.7
46.9
29.9
28.5
57.2
60.5
59.0
42.8
42.4
36.5
40.9
45.4
AB
CA
rmor
53-
R15
RR
2Y46
.311
.937
.651
.663
.147
.745
.530
.226
.662
.757
.861
.848
.246
.435
.540
.038
.9B
CS
chill
inge
r 557
RC
45.1
12.0
41.8
53.8
58.5
46.6
43.5
31.4
29.1
55.5
62.1
59.4
40.4
38.9
39.8
37.2
38.8
BC
Asg
row
AG
5532
GE
NR
R2Y
44.9
11.5
34.6
51.4
64.4
48.3
44.1
31.1
30.4
58.1
58.6
59.2
42.8
37.5
37.1
35.0
41.4
BC
Dyn
a-G
ro 3
5P53
RR
44.3
11.6
35.9
38.7
62.4
33.1
47.1
32.0
37.7
48.7
61.5
71.3
39.0
40.1
31.2
38.0
48.6
BC
DH
ornb
eck
R55
2544
.012
.929
.942
.967
.647
.346
.831
.330
.752
.258
.255
.043
.440
.435
.734
.843
.7B
CD
Pro
geny
533
0RR
43.6
11.7
35.8
35.1
64.7
38.2
41.4
30.0
37.6
52.3
61.9
66.8
43.9
39.4
31.8
36.0
39.8
CD
Dai
ryla
nd 8
509
43.3
11.6
38.3
58.4
62.9
35.3
39.5
28.7
25.2
61.9
54.8
53.4
51.5
41.9
31.2
32.0
35.1
DN
K B
rand
S51
-T8
40.8
11.7
30.8
49.5
53.1
35.2
35.9
28.1
25.6
59.6
51.4
53.1
42.5
37.7
35.0
35.6
39.1
Ave
rage
(bu/
a )44
.711
.936
.749
.863
.041
.844
.130
.729
.757
.558
.760
.245
.041
.634
.937
.040
.6†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
Moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.§
Pla
ntin
g da
te.
Eac
h va
riety
was
eva
luat
ed in
a la
rge
strip
-plo
t at e
ach
loct
ion,
thus
eac
h co
unty
test
was
con
side
red
as o
ne re
plic
atio
n of
t
he te
st in
cal
cula
ting
the
aver
age
yiel
d an
d in
con
duct
ing
the
stat
istic
al a
naly
sis
to d
eter
min
e si
gnifi
cant
diff
eren
ces
(MS
).V
arie
ty d
enot
ed w
ith a
n as
teris
k (*
) was
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0.M
S=
Var
ietie
s w
ith a
ny M
S le
tter i
n co
mm
on a
re n
ot s
tatis
tical
ly d
iffer
ent a
t the
5%
leve
l of p
roba
bilit
y.D
ata
prov
ided
by
Rob
ert C
. Will
iam
s, E
xt. A
rea
Spe
cial
ist,
Gra
in C
rops
, and
the
exte
nsio
n ag
ents
in th
e co
untie
s sh
own
abov
e.
42
Tabl
e 34
. Yi
elds
† a
nd d
isea
se ra
tings
§ o
f 10
early
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.0
- 5.
5) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in 1
5 Te
nnes
see
and
Ken
tuck
y C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
dur
ing
2011
. C
STA
vg.
------
------
------
------
---- R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan
------
------
------
------
------
----
Yiel
dC
erco
spor
aSt
emSp
raye
d ¶
Uns
pray
edSC
NM
SB
rand
/Var
iety
(n=1
5)M
oist
ure
‡SD
SFr
ogey
eB
light
Can
ker
Ant
hrac
nose
Yiel
dYi
eld
Rac
e 2
Rac
e 3
Rac
e 5
bu/a
%20
09 /
10 /
2011
2009
/ 10
/ 20
1120
10 /
1120
1120
11bu
/abu
/a20
1120
1120
11A
Asg
row
AG
5332
GE
NR
R2Y
48.3
11.8
---
/
4.0
/ 0
.50.
31.
855
.351
.2M
SR
SA
B*M
orso
y R
T542
9 R
R46
.712
.1
/ 0
.5 /
/ 0.8
/ 0.
5
0.5
/ 7.5
1.5
2.0
42.8
42.4
SM
RS
AB
CA
rmor
53-
R15
RR
2Y46
.311
.9--
-
/ 1
.3
/ 7.0
0.0
3.0
48.2
46.4
SR
SB
CS
chill
inge
r 557
RC
45.1
12.0
/
0.5
/
/
5.8
/ 4.5
5.
5 / 8
.30.
03.
040
.438
.9M
SM
RS
BC
Asg
row
AG
5532
GE
NR
R2Y
44.9
11.5
---
/
5.0
/ 6
.80.
05.
842
.837
.5M
SR
SB
CD
yna-
Gro
35P
53 R
R44
.311
.6--
-
/ 4
.5
/ 5.8
2.0
5.5
39.0
40.1
SH
SS
BC
DH
ornb
eck
R55
2544
.012
.9--
-
/ 0
.3
/ 6.5
1.3
2.0
43.4
40.4
SM
SS
BC
DP
roge
ny 5
330R
R43
.611
.7
/ 0
.8 /
/
1.0
/ 0.0
3.
5 / 6
.50.
52.
043
.939
.4S
HS
SC
DD
airy
land
850
943
.311
.6
7.0
/ 1.
0 /
0.0
/ 1.
8 / 6
.3
0.5
/ 0.0
0.0
6.0
51.5
41.9
SR
SD
NK
Bra
nd S
51-T
840
.811
.7--
-
/ 7
.3
/ 0.0
0.0
5.3
42.5
37.7
SR
MS
Ave
rage
(bu/
a )44
.711
.945
.041
.6†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
Moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.§
Dis
ease
ratin
gs fo
r SD
S, F
roge
ye L
eaf S
pot,
and
Cec
ospo
ra B
light
, Ste
m C
anke
r, an
d A
nthr
acno
se a
re fr
om 0
-10,
whe
re 0
=no
dise
ase
&
10
=max
imum
leve
l of d
isea
se o
r pla
nt d
eath
. S
DS
= S
udde
n D
eath
Syn
drom
e.¶
Spr
ayed
plo
ts a
t Mila
n tre
ated
with
Hea
dlin
e @
6 o
z./A
cre
+ 0.
25%
Pen
etra
tor P
lus
at 2
0 gp
a at
R3
grow
th s
tage
.D
isea
se ra
tings
com
pile
d by
Dr.
Mel
vin
New
man
from
repl
icat
ed p
lots
at t
he R
esea
rch
and
Edu
catio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan.
SC
N ra
tings
; HS
= h
ighl
y su
scep
tible
, S =
sus
cept
ible
, MS
= m
oder
atel
y su
scep
tible
, MR
= m
oder
atel
y re
sist
ant R
= re
sist
ant.
Rac
e 2
(HG
Typ
e 1.
2.5.
7); R
ace
3 (H
G T
ype
5.7)
; Rac
e 5
(HG
Typ
e 2.
5.7)
SC
N G
reen
hous
e R
atin
gs c
ompi
led
by D
r. P
at D
onal
d, R
esea
rch
Pla
nt P
ath.
, US
DA
-AR
S, W
est T
N R
EC
.M
S=
Var
ietie
s w
ith o
ne o
r mor
e le
tters
in c
omm
on a
re n
ot s
tatis
tical
ly d
iffer
ent a
t the
.05
leve
l of p
roba
bilit
y.V
arie
ty d
enot
ed w
ith a
n as
teris
k (*
) was
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0.D
ata
prov
ided
by
Rob
ert C
. Will
iam
s, E
xt. A
rea
Spe
cial
ist,
Gra
in C
rops
.
43
Tabl
e 35
. O
vera
ll av
erag
e yi
elds
† a
nd m
oist
ures
of s
even
Ear
ly M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.0 -
5.5)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts (n
=15)
and
Res
earc
h an
d Ed
ucat
ion
Cen
ters
(n=7
) in
Tenn
esse
e in
201
1.
R
esea
rch
and
Ave
rage
s of
CST
& R
EC T
ests
C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
rials
E
duca
tion
Cen
ter T
rials
Avg
.A
vg.
Avg
.B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Yi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
ebu
/a%
bu/a
%bu
/a%
Asg
row
AG
5332
GE
NR
R2Y
4912
.048
11.8
5012
.2A
rmor
53-R
15 (R
R2Y
)49
12.7
4611
.952
13.4
Asg
row
AG
5532
GE
NR
R2Y
4811
.745
11.5
5211
.9S
chill
inge
r See
d55
7 R
C48
12.0
4512
.051
12.0
Dyn
a-G
ro35
P53
(RR
)46
11.8
4411
.648
12.0
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 5
525
(RR
)45
13.1
4412
.947
13.3
NK
S 5
1-T8
Bra
nd (R
R)
4311
.941
11.7
4612
.1A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4712
.245
11.9
4912
.4†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
44
Tabl
e 36
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 1
1 La
te M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.6 -
5.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
sev
enen
viro
nmen
ts in
Ten
ness
ee d
urin
g 20
11.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Spr
ingf
ield
M
ilan
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=7)
Kno
xvill
eIrr
.N
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.N
on-Ir
r2A
mes
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
bu/a
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-P
roge
ny57
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)60
± 1
9158
6869
4640
44TN
Exp
TN09
-44,
121
(RR
2Y)
56 ±
184
5562
5654
4336
Pro
geny
5655
RY
(RR
2Y)
55 ±
184
5558
6045
4245
Cro
plan
R2C
582
0 (R
R2Y
)55
± 1
7565
5761
4140
46U
SG
Alle
n (R
R)
54 ±
181
5161
6343
4040
Asg
row
AG
5831
GE
NR
R2Y
53 ±
175
5559
6141
3443
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd56
R21
(RR
)52
± 1
7150
5864
4236
43A
sgro
wA
G56
32 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
52 ±
174
6053
5442
3740
Pro
geny
5610
RY
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
163
5957
6243
3839
TN E
xpTN
09-4
8,26
3 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
5953
5655
4642
33P
roge
ny58
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
6843
5653
4236
43A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5374
5658
6044
3941
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
314
137
97
57
C.V
. (%
)10
.210
.913
.56.
68.
910
.16.
99.
6†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
45
Tabl
e 37
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
11
Late
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.6
- 5.
9) R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
varie
ties
eval
uate
d in
sev
en e
nviro
nmen
ts in
Ten
ness
ee d
urin
g 20
11.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Seed
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=7)
(n=7
)(n
=3)
(n=6
)(n
=6)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
-- S
core
----
----
%%
Sco
reP
roge
ny57
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)60
± 1
12.8
2.1
3814
41.
02.
537
.222
.11.
2TN
Exp
TN09
-44,
121
(RR
2Y)
56 ±
115
.32.
138
145
1.0
2.5
38.5
21.1
1.0
Pro
geny
5655
RY
(RR
2Y)
55 ±
112
.61.
440
143
1.0
2.7
37.5
22.3
1.5
Cro
plan
R2C
582
0 (R
R2Y
)55
± 1
12.8
1.6
3814
21.
02.
237
.221
.71.
2U
SG
Alle
n (R
R)
54 ±
113
.51.
640
145
1.0
2.0
39.2
21.3
1.0
Asg
row
AG
5831
GE
NR
R2Y
53 ±
113
.21.
435
142
1.0
1.8
38.0
21.0
1.0
Terr
al-R
EV
Bra
nd56
R21
(RR
)52
± 1
13.2
2.0
3914
31.
02.
238
.821
.61.
0A
sgro
wA
G56
32 G
EN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
52 ±
112
.51.
840
141
1.0
1.8
37.5
22.3
1.7
Pro
geny
5610
RY
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
112
.81.
738
143
1.0
1.7
37.3
21.7
1.0
TN E
xpTN
09-4
8,26
3 (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
13.1
1.5
3614
41.
01.
537
.021
.11.
0P
roge
ny58
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)49
± 1
12.4
1.9
3814
21.
02.
239
.421
.01.
0A
vera
ge53
13.1
1.7
3814
31.
02.
138
.021
.61.
1†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e >4
5°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.S
eed
Qua
lity
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f see
ds s
how
ing
dise
ase
or s
plit
seed
coa
ts; 5
=95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
46
Tabl
e 38
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of t
hree
Lat
e M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.6 -
5.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
anva
rietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
ix e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
± St
d Er
r.
Spr
ingf
ield
M
ilan
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
Kno
xvill
eIrr
.N
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.A
mes
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---b
u/a-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
Pro
geny
5610
RY
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
175
4541
6142
41U
SG
Alle
n (R
R)
50 ±
183
4042
6137
38Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
56R
21 (R
R)
49 ±
173
4140
5739
41A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5077
4241
6040
40L.
S.D
. .05 (b
u/a)
311
105
78
9.0
C.V
. (%
)10
.79.
513
.77.
38.
211
.813
.6†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a R
R a
ppea
rs in
side
par
enth
eses
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
Tabl
e 39
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
thre
e La
te M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.6 -
5.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
anva
rietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
ix e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
a fSe
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=5)
(n=1
1)(n
=10)
(n=6
)(n
=1)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
-- S
core
----
----
----
-%
%S
core
Pro
geny
5610
RY
(RR
2Y)
51 ±
111
.51.
737
144
1.0
1.2
2.0
37.7
22.0
1.0
US
GA
llen
(RR
)50
± 1
13.0
1.7
3914
81.
01.
71.
939
.521
.41.
0Te
rral
-RE
V B
rand
56R
21 (R
R)
49 ±
111
.62.
039
145
1.0
1.5
2.0
39.1
21.8
1.0
Ave
rage
5012
.01.
838
146
1.0
1.4
2.0
38.8
21.7
1.0
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
47
Tabl
e 40
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of o
ne L
ate
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
(5.6
- 5.
9)R
ound
up R
eady
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in fo
ur e
nviro
nmen
ts(n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
± St
d Er
r.Sp
ringf
ield
M
ilan
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
Kno
xvill
eN
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
--bu
/a--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-U
SG
Alle
n (R
R)
58 ±
177
4763
47A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
5877
4763
47L.
S.D
. .05 (b
u/a)
411
710
8C
.V. (
%)
10.7
10.6
10.0
10.9
10.5
Tabl
e 41
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
one
Lat
e M
atur
ity G
roup
V (5
.6 -
5.9)
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
anva
rietie
s ev
alua
ted
in fo
ur e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
edSD
S±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
DI
DS
DX
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=9)
(n=1
2)(n
=12)
(n=6
)(n
=1)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
--- S
core
----
----
----
--%
%S
core
%0
- 9in
dex
US
GA
llen
(RR
)58
± 1
13.8
1.9
4215
01.
01.
72.
139
.821
.41.
080
.03.
026
.9A
vera
ge58
13.8
1.9
4215
01.
01.
72.
139
.821
.41.
080
.03.
026
.9†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
DI =
dis
ease
inci
denc
e =
perc
enta
ge o
f pla
nts
with
sym
ptom
sD
S =
dis
ease
sev
erity
= s
core
of l
eaf c
hlor
osis
and
nec
rosi
s; 0
= n
o sy
mpt
oms;
9 =
pla
nt d
eath
bef
ore
norm
al d
efol
iatio
n du
e to
sen
esce
nce.
DX
= d
isea
se in
dex
= (D
I x D
S /
9); r
atin
gs w
ere
mad
e at
app
roxi
mat
ely
R6
whe
n gr
een
pods
with
see
d ha
ve re
ache
d fu
ll si
ze a
t Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
6/09
.
48
Table 42. Mean yields † of 27 Maturity Group IV Conventional, Liberty Link and RoundupReady soybean varieties evaluated in five environments in Tennessee during 2011.
Avg. Yield ± Std Err. Springfield Milan Brand Variety ‡ (n=5) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr.
---------------------------------bu/a---------------------------------------TN Exp TN05-5018 53 ± 1 42 61 44 65 52Stine 47LC32 (LL) 51 ± 1 52 61 39 58 47VA Hanover 51 ± 1 41 64 36 66 46NC Exp NCC06-339 49 ± 1 41 60 29 62 51GoSoy 4411 LL 48 ± 1 54 52 32 60 44MO Exp S08-17361 48 ± 1 49 51 34 64 41Beck's 426NL 47 ± 1 47 57 29 61 39USG 74B58 (RR Check) 46 ± 1 44 58 29 59 40Halo 4:65 (LL) 46 ± 1 53 49 34 55 40Stine 45LC82 (LL) 46 ± 1 49 46 30 65 39Beck's 456NL 45 ± 1 47 54 26 62 38Progeny 4910 45 ± 1 42 57 34 56 38USG 74A91 (RR Check) 45 ± 1 42 54 31 56 42USG 74G99L (LL) 44 ± 1 40 63 33 46 41TN Exp TN09-029 44 ± 1 37 54 33 58 40Stine 43LC23 (LL) 44 ± 1 47 50 27 55 41AR UA 4910 44 ± 1 39 45 35 62 38GoSoy 4810 LL 44 ± 1 42 47 35 54 40Progeny 4928 LL 44 ± 1 46 51 28 50 44TN Exp TN09-016 44 ± 1 34 54 29 59 43Halo 4:94 (LL) 44 ± 1 45 48 33 49 43Hornbeck HBK C 4926 43 ± 1 38 57 31 52 40Beck's 476NL 43 ± 1 42 48 28 54 42Halo 4:75 (LL) 42 ± 1 49 44 29 50 36TN Exp TN10-4037 41 ± 1 43 49 29 53 33Delta Grow 4861 LL 41 ± 1 43 46 29 52 36Beck's 392NL 39 ± 1 40 44 23 52 36Average (bu/a) 45 44 52 31 57 41L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 3 8 11 8 7 3C.V. (%) 10.8 10.5 12.8 16.5 7.9 5.2† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (LL), then it is not part of the variety name.
49
Tabl
e 43
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
27
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
Con
vent
iona
l, Li
bert
y Li
nk, a
nd R
ound
up R
eady
soyb
ean
varie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=5
)(n
=5)
(n=2
)(n
=5)
(n=5
)(n
=2)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
TN E
xpTN
05-5
018
53 ±
115
.01.
136
138
1.0
1.8
40.1
20.9
1.2
Stin
e47
LC32
(LL)
51 ±
114
.72.
846
135
1.0
3.0
40.9
21.3
1.2
VA
Han
over
51 ±
117
.01.
237
137
1.0
1.5
41.4
20.6
1.0
NC
Exp
NC
C06
-339
49 ±
114
.41.
035
136
1.0
1.5
40.1
20.7
1.7
GoS
oy44
11 L
L48
± 1
13.3
2.3
4113
01.
02.
539
.223
.11.
0M
O E
xpS
08-1
7361
48 ±
118
.72.
342
139
1.0
1.5
37.4
22.6
2.3
Bec
k's
426N
L47
± 1
12.7
2.0
3912
71.
12.
540
.422
.62.
2U
SG
74B
58 (R
R C
heck
)46
± 1
12.6
1.6
3512
81.
12.
239
.922
.31.
0H
alo
4:65
(LL)
46 ±
113
.12.
540
128
1.2
2.2
39.1
23.2
1.2
Stin
e45
LC82
(LL)
46 ±
113
.51.
941
129
1.0
2.5
38.7
22.9
1.2
Bec
k's
456N
L45
± 1
14.2
2.4
4112
91.
02.
539
.722
.51.
0P
roge
ny49
1045
± 1
16.6
2.8
4413
61.
02.
339
.122
.13.
7U
SG
74A
91 (R
R C
heck
)45
± 1
13.3
2.1
3913
41.
02.
540
.421
.53.
0U
SG
74G
99L
(LL)
44 ±
115
.81.
841
137
1.0
2.0
37.9
22.7
1.2
TN E
xpTN
09-0
2944
± 1
12.9
1.2
3613
41.
01.
538
.820
.31.
0S
tine
43LC
23 (L
L)44
± 1
12.9
2.3
4113
11.
33.
339
.623
.01.
2A
RU
A 4
910
44 ±
113
.91.
538
134
1.0
2.0
39.2
21.6
2.5
GoS
oy48
10 L
L44
± 1
12.1
2.7
4013
11.
02.
038
.822
.41.
2P
roge
ny49
28 L
L44
± 1
13.5
1.6
3913
51.
01.
838
.422
.21.
2TN
Exp
TN09
-016
44 ±
114
.81.
336
134
1.0
1.3
40.2
20.6
1.0
Hal
o4:
94 (L
L)44
± 1
13.6
1.8
4013
51.
01.
838
.222
.31.
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K C
492
643
± 1
13.1
3.3
4113
31.
01.
539
.122
.71.
0B
eck'
s47
6NL
43 ±
113
.53.
142
132
1.2
2.2
40.4
21.9
1.0
Hal
o4:
75 (L
L)42
± 1
12.7
1.4
4312
91.
11.
839
.323
.71.
0TN
Exp
TN10
-403
741
± 1
11.3
2.8
3712
21.
81.
840
.221
.92.
8D
elta
Gro
w48
61 L
L41
± 1
12.9
2.3
4313
01.
02.
240
.323
.51.
0B
eck'
s39
2NL
39 ±
112
.02.
334
124
1.5
1.8
41.4
21.4
1.3
Ave
rage
4513
.92.
040
132
1.1
2.1
39.6
22.1
1.5
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle
>45°
. M
atur
ity =
day
s af
ter p
lant
ing
(DA
P).
Sha
tterin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= n
o sh
atte
ring;
5 =
90+
% o
f pod
s sh
atte
red.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5=9
5+%
of s
eed
are
dise
ased
or h
ave
split
see
d co
ats.
Pro
tein
& O
il on
dry
wei
ght b
asis
.Fr
ogey
e =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
; 5 =
95%
+ o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts. R
atin
gs fr
om K
noxv
ille
on 9
/1/1
1.
50
Tabl
e 44
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 1
0 M
atur
ity G
roup
IV C
onve
ntio
nal,
Libe
rty
Link
, and
Rou
ndup
Rea
dyso
ybea
n va
rietie
s ev
alua
ted
in fi
ve e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=10)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
wo
year
s, 2
010
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
±
Std
Err.
S
prin
gfie
ld
Mila
n
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
0)K
noxv
ille
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---b
u/a-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
VA
Han
over
43 ±
141
4727
5941
Hal
o4:
65 (L
L)43
± 1
4642
3052
44U
SG
74A
91 (R
R C
heck
)42
± 1
4443
2657
40P
roge
ny49
1042
± 1
4547
2753
37A
RU
A 4
910
42 ±
141
4129
5938
US
G74
G99
L (L
L)41
± 1
4350
2746
39H
alo
4:94
(LL)
40 ±
145
4028
4541
Pro
geny
4928
LL
39 ±
144
4425
4341
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
C 4
926
38 ±
140
4427
4436
Del
ta G
row
4861
LL
38 ±
142
3924
4937
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)41
4344
2751
39L.
S.D
. .05 (b
u/a)
36
88
104
C.V
. (%
)12
.09.
412
.718
.313
.15.
9†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
51
Tabl
e 45
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
10
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
Con
vent
iona
l, Li
bert
y Li
nk, a
nd R
ound
up R
eady
soyb
ean
varie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
0) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Lea f
Seed
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Ret
entio
nQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
0)(n
=10)
(n=5
)(n
=10)
(n=1
0)(n
=5)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
----
Sco
re --
----
----
---
%%
Sco
reV
AH
anov
er43
± 1
14.8
1.7
3613
51.
01.
41.
941
.721
.01.
0H
alo
4:65
(LL)
43 ±
112
.42.
140
127
1.2
1.2
2.7
39.7
23.3
1.2
US
G74
A91
(RR
Che
ck)
42 ±
112
.41.
839
133
1.0
1.8
3.1
40.5
22.2
3.0
Pro
geny
4910
42 ±
114
.82.
544
134
1.0
1.7
2.9
39.6
22.4
3.7
AR
UA
491
042
± 1
12.5
1.4
3813
21.
01.
42.
339
.422
.32.
5U
SG
74G
99L
(LL)
41 ±
113
.71.
740
134
1.0
1.2
2.4
39.1
22.3
1.2
Hal
o4:
94 (L
L)40
± 1
12.6
1.7
3913
31.
11.
32.
139
.122
.21.
0P
roge
ny49
28 L
L39
± 1
12.7
1.5
3813
31.
01.
32.
239
.022
.31.
2H
ornb
eck
HB
K C
492
638
± 1
12.2
2.8
4113
11.
01.
31.
839
.523
.01.
0D
elta
Gro
w48
61 L
L38
± 1
12.2
1.8
4312
91.
11.
43.
041
.123
.61.
0A
vera
ge41
13.0
1.9
4013
21.
01.
42.
439
.922
.41.
7†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
52
Tabl
e 46
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of t
wo
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
Con
vent
iona
l and
one
Libe
rty
Link
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in fo
ur e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
inTe
nnes
see
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
± St
d Er
r.Sp
ringf
ield
M
ilan
B
rand
Varie
ty(n
=12)
Kno
xvill
eN
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
--bu
/a--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--A
RU
A 4
910
49 ±
148
3662
48P
roge
ny49
1047
± 1
5136
5546
US
G74
G99
L (L
L)44
± 1
4138
5445
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)47
4737
5746
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
49
810
7C
.V. (
%)
11.4
12.1
13.4
11.5
8.5
Tabl
e 47
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
two
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
Con
vent
iona
l and
one
Lib
erty
Lin
k so
ybea
n va
rietie
sev
alua
ted
in fo
ur e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
Le
afSe
edSD
S±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gR
eten
tion
Qua
lity
Prot
ein
Oil
Frog
eye
DI
DS
DX
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=9)
(n=1
2)(n
=12)
(n=6
)(n
=2)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
--- S
core
----
----
----
--%
%S
core
%0
- 9in
dex
AR
UA
491
049
± 1
13.3
1.4
3913
31.
01.
42.
839
.322
.42.
570
.01.
712
.2P
roge
ny49
1047
± 1
15.1
2.6
4513
51.
01.
73.
239
.722
.63.
766
.72.
318
.3U
SG
74G
99L
(LL)
44 ±
114
.61.
642
135
1.0
1.2
2.7
39.5
22.4
1.2
98.3
5.0
55.0
Ave
rage
4714
.31.
942
135
1.0
1.4
2.9
39.5
22.4
2.4
78.3
3.0
28.5
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
§ A
vera
ge m
oist
ure
at h
arve
stLo
dgin
g =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= 9
5% o
f pla
nts
erec
t; 2.
5 =
~50%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
ang
le ≥
45°
; 5 =
95+
% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
n an
gle ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
DI =
dis
ease
inci
denc
e =
perc
enta
ge o
f pla
nts
with
sym
ptom
sD
S =
dis
ease
sev
erity
= s
core
of l
eaf c
hlor
osis
and
nec
rosi
s; 0
= n
o sy
mpt
oms;
9 =
pla
nt d
eath
bef
ore
norm
al d
efol
iatio
n du
e to
sen
esce
nce.
DX
= d
isea
se in
dex
= (D
I x D
S /
9); r
atin
gs w
ere
mad
e at
app
roxi
mat
ely
R6
whe
n gr
een
pods
with
see
d ha
ve re
ache
d fu
ll si
ze a
t Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
6/09
.
53
Tabl
e 48
. Yi
elds
† o
f sev
en L
ate
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) L
iber
ty-L
ink
(LL)
soy
bean
var
ietie
s in
six
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Te
sts
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.
REC
REC
atat
REC
Avg
.M
ilan
Mila
nat
MS
Bra
nd/V
arie
tyYi
eld
Moi
st‡
Dye
rLa
keirr
ig./f
ung.
irrig
./no
fung
.M
ilan
Obi
onbu
/a%
6/6
§6/
75/
105/
106/
26/
15A
*US
G 7
4G99
LL48
.911
.658
.051
.455
.750
.640
.038
.0A
BW
arre
n S
eed
Mic
ah 4
900L
L48
.712
.457
.954
.548
.842
.445
.443
.1A
BC
Hor
nbec
k H
ALO
4:9
447
.211
.856
.152
.545
.645
.640
.842
.4A
BC
Sch
illin
ger G
o-S
oy 4
910L
46.7
12.1
55.2
53.6
42.0
41.0
45.4
43.1
AB
C*P
roge
ny 4
928L
L45
.612
.150
.650
.651
.546
.738
.535
.5B
CP
roge
ny 4
960L
L44
.411
.150
.749
.951
.645
.436
.132
.7C
War
ren
See
d M
icah
460
0LL
43.3
11.4
51.9
53.0
38.5
37.9
36.9
41.9
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)46
.411
.854
.452
.247
.744
.240
.439
.5†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
Moi
stur
e at
har
vest
.§
Pla
ntin
g da
te.
Eac
h va
riety
was
eva
luat
ed in
a la
rge
strip
-plo
t at e
ach
loct
ion,
thus
eac
h co
unty
test
was
con
side
red
as o
ne re
plic
atio
n of
t
he te
st in
cal
cula
ting
the
aver
age
yiel
d an
d in
con
duct
ing
the
stat
istic
al a
naly
sis
to d
eter
min
e si
gnifi
cant
diff
eren
ces
(MS
).V
arie
ties
deno
ted
with
an
aste
risks
(*)
wer
e in
the
top
perfo
rmin
g gr
oup
in 2
010.
MS
= V
arie
ties
with
any
MS
lette
r in
com
mon
are
not
sta
tistic
ally
diff
eren
t at t
he 5
% le
vel o
f pro
babi
lity.
Dat
a pr
ovid
ed b
y R
ober
t C. W
illia
ms,
Ext
. Are
a S
peci
alis
t, G
rain
Cro
ps, a
nd th
e ex
tens
ion
agen
ts in
the
coun
ties
show
n ab
ove.
54
Tabl
e 49
. Yi
elds
† a
nd d
isea
se ra
tings
§ o
f sev
en L
ate
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
(4.6
- 4.
9) L
iber
ty L
ink
(LL)
soy
bean
var
ietie
s ev
alua
ted
in s
ix
Tenn
esse
e C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
ests
dur
ing
2011
. C
STA
vg.
--
------
------
-- R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan
------
------
------
Yiel
dC
erco
spor
aSp
raye
d ¶
Uns
pray
edSC
NM
SB
rand
/Var
iety
(n=6
)M
oist
ure
‡SD
SFr
ogey
eB
light
Ant
hrac
nose
Yiel
dYi
eld
Rac
e 2
Rac
e 3
Rac
e 5
bu/a
%20
1020
10 /
1120
10 /
1120
11bu
/abu
/a20
1120
1120
11A
*US
G 7
4G99
LL48
.911
.60.
81.
8 / 0
.01.
8 / 0
.03.
555
.750
.6S
HS
SA
BW
arre
n S
eed
Mic
ah 4
900L
L48
.712
.4--
-
/ 0
.5
/ 0
.02.
448
.842
.4S
SS
AB
CH
ornb
eck
HA
LO 4
:94
47.2
11.8
---
/
0.0
/
0.1
3.8
45.6
45.6
SS
SA
BC
Sch
illin
ger G
o-S
oy 4
910L
46.7
12.1
---
/
0.0
/
0.3
3.3
42.0
41.0
SS
SA
BC
*Pro
geny
492
8LL
45.6
12.1
0.3
1.8
/ 0.0
0.8
/ 0.1
3.1
51.5
46.7
SS
SB
CP
roge
ny 4
960L
L44
.411
.1--
-
/ 0.0
/
0.0
3.0
51.6
45.4
SH
SS
CW
arre
n S
eed
Mic
ah 4
600L
L43
.311
.4--
-
/ 0.0
/
0.1
3.5
38.5
37.9
SR
SA
vera
ge (b
u/a)
46.4
11.8
47.7
44.2
† Y
ield
s ha
ve b
een
adju
sted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ M
oist
ure
at h
arve
st.
§ D
isea
se ra
tings
for S
DS
, Fro
geye
Lea
f Spo
t, C
ecos
pora
Blig
ht, a
nd A
nthr
acno
se a
re fr
om 0
-10,
whe
re 0
=no
dise
ase
&
10
=max
imum
leve
l of d
isea
se o
r pla
nt d
eath
. S
DS
= S
udde
n D
eath
Syn
drom
e.¶
Spr
ayed
plo
ts a
t Mila
n tre
ated
with
Hea
dlin
e @
6 o
z./A
cre
+ 0.
25%
Pen
etra
tor P
lus
at 2
0 gp
a at
R3
grow
th s
tage
.D
isea
se ra
tings
com
pile
d by
Dr.
Mel
vin
New
man
from
repl
icat
ed p
lots
at t
he R
esea
rch
and
Edu
catio
n C
ente
r at M
ilan.
SC
N ra
tings
; HS
= h
ighl
y su
scep
tible
, S =
sus
cept
ible
, MS
= m
oder
atel
y su
scep
tible
, MR
= m
oder
atel
y re
sist
ant R
= re
sist
ant.
Rac
e 2
(HG
Typ
e 1.
2.5.
7); R
ace
3 (H
G T
ype
5.7)
; Rac
e 5
(HG
Typ
e 2.
5.7)
SC
N G
reen
hous
e R
atin
gs c
ompi
led
by D
r. P
at D
onal
d, R
esea
rch
Pla
nt P
ath.
, US
DA
-AR
S, W
est T
N R
EC
.M
S=
Var
ietie
s w
ith o
ne o
r mor
e le
tters
in c
omm
on a
re n
ot s
tatis
tical
ly d
iffer
ent a
t the
.05
leve
l of p
roba
bilit
y.V
arie
ties
deno
ted
with
an
aste
risk
(*) w
ere
in th
e to
p pe
rform
ing
grou
p in
201
0.D
ata
prov
ided
by
Rob
ert C
. Will
iam
s, E
xt. A
rea
Spe
cial
ist,
Gra
in C
rops
.
55
Tabl
e 50
. O
vera
ll av
erag
e yi
elds
† a
nd m
oist
ures
of t
wo
Mat
urity
Gro
up IV
Lib
erty
Lin
k so
ybea
n va
rietie
s ev
alua
ted
in
Cou
nty
Stan
dard
Tes
ts (n
=6) a
nd R
esea
rch
and
Educ
atio
n C
ente
rs (n
=5) i
n Te
nnes
see
in 2
011.
R
esea
rch
and
Ave
rage
s of
CST
& R
EC T
ests
C
ount
y St
anda
rd T
rials
E
duca
tion
Cen
ter T
rials
Avg
.A
vg.
Avg
.B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Yi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
eYi
eld
Moi
stur
ebu
/a%
bu/a
%bu
/a%
US
G74
G99
L (L
L)46
13.7
4911
.644
15.8
Pro
geny
4928
LL
4512
.846
12.1
4413
.5A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4613
.247
11.8
4414
.6†
Yie
lds
have
bee
n ad
just
ed to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
56
Table 51. Mean yields † of 28 Maturity Group V Conventional, Liberty Link, and RoundupReady soybean varieties evaluated in five environments in Tennessee during 2011.
Avg. Yield± Std Err. Springfield Milan
Brand Variety ‡ (n=5) Knoxville Irr. Non-Irr. Irr. Non-Irr. ----------------------------------------bu/a------------------------------------------
NC Exp NCC06-579 55 ± 1 54 60 38 70 50USG Allen (RR Check) 54 ± 1 52 59 36 69 52USG 5601T 54 ± 1 52 62 37 66 52NC Exp NCC04-1555 53 ± 1 44 63 39 61 58NC Exp NCC06-2188 52 ± 1 46 61 39 66 48GoSoy 5111 LL 52 ± 1 45 54 39 68 54AR Osage 50 ± 1 48 57 31 65 51AR R04-357 50 ± 1 50 53 36 61 48Progeny 5261 LL 49 ± 1 43 62 31 62 48Progeny 5191 49 ± 1 43 58 25 69 50Halo 5:65 (LL) 49 ± 1 45 55 39 58 48Progeny 5960 LL 48 ± 1 46 51 33 66 46AR Ozark 48 ± 1 46 60 27 59 49Hornbeck HBK C 5528 48 ± 1 52 49 39 61 39Progeny 5770 48 ± 1 48 51 30 64 47NC Exp NCC05-1261 48 ± 1 43 57 28 65 46Progeny 5160 LL 48 ± 1 40 57 31 60 50NC Exp NCC05-1168 48 ± 1 42 59 26 65 45TN Exp TN09-008 47 ± 1 43 50 27 65 52USDA - NC Exp N02-417 47 ± 1 40 57 33 57 49Halo 5:25 (LL) 47 ± 1 43 50 34 58 49VA Glenn 47 ± 1 42 51 26 64 52USDA-TN JTN-5203 45 ± 1 40 49 23 66 46USDA-TN JTN-4408 45 ± 1 43 48 28 60 46USDA-TN JTN-5110 44 ± 1 42 49 26 58 46Delta Grow 5461 LL 44 ± 1 46 54 22 52 48Progeny 5460 LL 43 ± 1 46 52 22 52 42USG 75J32 (RR Check) 43 ± 1 38 44 25 60 46Average (bu/a) 48 45 55 31 62 48L.S.D..05 (bu/a) 3 5 8 6 8 5C.V. (%) 8.3 6.5 8.9 12.6 7.6 6.8† All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‡ If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.
57
Tabl
e 52
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
28
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
Con
vent
iona
l, Li
bert
y Li
nk, a
nd R
ound
up R
eady
soyb
ean
varie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
in T
enne
ssee
dur
ing
2011
.A
vg. Y
ield
Se
ed±
Std
Err.
Moi
stur
e §
Lodg
ing
Hei
ght
Mat
urity
Shat
terin
gQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=5
)(n
=5)
(n=2
)(n
=5)
(n=5
)(n
=2)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
Sco
re --
----
--%
%S
core
NC
Exp
NC
C06
-579
55 ±
113
.61.
641
148
1.0
2.3
40.7
20.9
2.2
US
GA
llen
(RR
Che
ck)
54 ±
113
.11.
342
149
1.0
2.3
39.6
21.5
1.5
US
G56
01T
54 ±
112
.41.
340
144
1.0
2.7
41.6
20.8
1.3
NC
Exp
NC
C04
-155
553
± 1
12.9
1.3
3514
71.
02.
537
.223
.01.
3N
C E
xpN
CC
06-2
188
52 ±
112
.41.
339
144
1.0
2.3
41.5
20.6
2.8
GoS
oy51
11 L
L52
± 1
12.4
1.4
3514
21.
02.
340
.222
.51.
0A
RO
sage
50 ±
112
.41.
032
143
1.2
2.2
42.8
20.6
1.2
AR
R04
-357
50 ±
112
.92.
039
145
1.2
2.3
40.5
20.8
1.0
Pro
geny
5261
LL
49 ±
112
.91.
536
142
1.0
1.7
41.1
21.7
1.2
Pro
geny
5191
49 ±
112
.61.
835
142
1.0
3.3
41.0
21.0
1.0
Hal
o5:
65 (L
L)49
± 1
12.5
1.2
3714
61.
01.
840
.420
.91.
0P
roge
ny59
60 L
L48
± 1
13.3
1.2
3514
61.
02.
240
.221
.21.
0A
RO
zark
48 ±
113
.01.
937
141
1.2
2.5
39.5
21.5
1.0
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
C 5
528
48 ±
115
.01.
841
149
1.0
2.2
41.3
20.9
1.0
Pro
geny
5770
48 ±
113
.41.
937
148
1.0
2.2
39.9
21.9
1.0
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-126
148
± 1
12.9
1.8
3514
01.
02.
541
.020
.21.
0P
roge
ny51
60 L
L48
± 1
12.3
1.3
3214
31.
02.
040
.022
.31.
2N
C E
xpN
CC
05-1
168
48 ±
112
.61.
835
140
1.0
3.0
40.6
20.6
1.0
TN E
xpTN
09-0
0847
± 1
12.8
1.3
3514
41.
22.
738
.721
.11.
0U
SD
A -
NC
Exp
N02
-417
47 ±
113
.21.
334
145
1.2
2.3
38.3
22.4
1.0
Hal
o5:
25 (L
L)47
± 1
12.5
1.5
3314
31.
02.
740
.721
.91.
0V
AG
lenn
47 ±
112
.71.
931
141
1.2
3.0
41.2
21.0
1.3
US
DA
-TN
JTN
-520
345
± 1
13.0
1.4
3514
31.
32.
241
.020
.61.
0U
SD
A-T
NJT
N-4
408
45 ±
112
.41.
837
141
1.0
2.8
40.5
21.4
1.2
US
DA
-TN
JTN
-511
044
± 1
12.7
1.4
3614
31.
21.
840
.221
.31.
2D
elta
Gro
w54
61 L
L44
± 1
12.4
1.3
3814
11.
23.
238
.722
.41.
2P
roge
ny54
60 L
L43
± 1
12.6
1.3
3814
11.
22.
538
.422
.61.
5U
SG
75J3
2 (R
R C
heck
)43
± 1
12.1
1.1
3614
41.
02.
740
.421
.12.
3A
vera
ge
4812
.81.
536
144
1.1
2.4
40.3
21.4
1.3
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e >4
5°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.S
eed
Qua
lity
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f see
ds s
how
ing
dise
ase
or s
plit
seed
coa
ts; 5
=95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.Fr
ogey
e =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
; 5 =
95%
+ o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts. R
atin
gs fr
om K
noxv
ille
on 9
/1/1
1.
58
Tabl
e 53
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of 1
9 M
atur
ity G
roup
V C
onve
ntio
nal,
Libe
rty
Link
, and
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
0) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld±
Std
Err.
Spr
ingf
ield
M
ilan
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡(n
=10)
Kno
xvill
eIrr
.N
on-Ir
r.Irr
.N
on-Ir
r.
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
bu/a
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
US
G56
01T
49 ±
151
5231
6645
US
GA
llen
(RR
Che
ck)
49 ±
154
4830
7043
AR
R04
-357
48 ±
155
4832
6641
NC
Exp
NC
C06
-218
848
± 1
4751
3168
43A
RO
sage
48 ±
152
4827
6447
NC
Exp
NC
C04
-155
548
± 1
4848
3265
45A
RO
zark
47 ±
150
4826
6445
Hal
o5:
65 (L
L)46
± 1
4747
3261
43P
roge
ny57
7045
± 1
4945
2663
41N
C E
xpN
CC
05-1
261
45 ±
145
4826
6144
VA
Gle
nn45
± 1
4444
2664
45P
roge
ny59
60 L
L44
± 1
4545
2865
38U
SD
A -
NC
Exp
N02
-417
44 ±
141
4727
6142
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-116
844
± 1
4747
2359
43TN
Exp
TN09
-008
43 ±
144
4526
5843
Hal
o5:
25 (L
L)43
± 1
4443
2658
42P
roge
ny51
60 L
L43
± 1
4045
2658
45U
SG
75J3
2 (R
R C
heck
)41
± 1
4139
2459
41P
roge
ny54
60 L
L39
± 1
4146
2150
38A
vera
ge (b
u/a)
4547
4727
6243
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
35
65
84
C.V
. (%
)9.
27.
28.
914
.29.
47.
2†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.
59
Tabl
e 54
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
19
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
Con
vent
iona
l, Li
bert
y Li
nk, a
nd R
ound
up R
eady
soyb
ean
varie
ties
eval
uate
d in
five
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
0) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r tw
o ye
ars,
201
0 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Leaf
Seed
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Ret
entio
nQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
0)(n
=10)
(n=7
)(n
=10)
(n=1
0)(n
=4)
(n=1
)(n
=2)
(n=2
)(n
=2)
(n=1
)bu
/a%
Sco
rein
.D
AP
--
----
----
----
Sco
re --
----
----
---
%%
Sco
reU
SG
5601
T49
± 1
11.6
1.5
3914
11.
02.
52.
341
.521
.31.
3U
SG
Alle
n (R
R C
heck
)49
± 1
13.0
1.5
4014
51.
01.
22.
440
.121
.51.
5A
RR
04-3
5748
± 1
11.8
2.2
3814
21.
02.
02.
240
.721
.01.
0N
C E
xpN
CC
06-2
188
48 ±
111
.81.
539
141
1.0
2.3
2.4
41.3
21.1
2.8
AR
Osa
ge48
± 1
11.2
1.1
3214
01.
02.
02.
342
.621
.01.
2N
C E
xpN
CC
04-1
555
48 ±
112
.21.
434
145
1.0
1.0
2.3
37.9
23.1
1.3
AR
Oza
rk47
± 1
12.0
1.7
3513
91.
01.
51.
939
.321
.91.
0H
alo
5:65
(LL)
46 ±
111
.41.
236
142
1.0
1.5
1.8
40.3
21.4
1.0
Pro
geny
5770
45 ±
112
.52.
137
144
1.0
2.5
2.1
39.8
22.5
1.0
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-126
145
± 1
12.0
1.6
3413
61.
01.
02.
341
.020
.91.
0V
AG
lenn
45 ±
111
.92.
030
138
1.0
1.3
2.3
40.9
21.5
1.3
Pro
geny
5960
LL
44 ±
111
.81.
236
141
1.0
1.2
1.8
39.7
21.6
1.0
US
DA
- N
C E
xpN
02-4
1744
± 1
12.5
1.4
3314
21.
01.
31.
938
.122
.91.
0N
C E
xpN
CC
05-1
168
44 ±
111
.41.
834
136
1.0
1.7
2.5
40.5
21.3
1.0
TN E
xpTN
09-0
0843
± 1
11.9
1.5
3414
11.
01.
72.
238
.621
.81.
0H
alo
5:25
(LL)
43 ±
111
.21.
531
139
1.0
2.0
2.2
40.8
22.0
1.0
Pro
geny
5160
LL
43 ±
111
.11.
530
139
1.0
1.3
2.2
40.3
22.4
1.2
US
G75
J32
(RR
Che
ck41
± 1
11.0
1.2
3614
11.
02.
32.
840
.821
.32.
3P
roge
ny54
60 L
L39
± 1
11.6
1.4
3813
71.
01.
32.
538
.622
.81.
5A
vera
ge45
11.8
1.5
3514
11.
01.
72.
240
.121
.71.
3†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
60
Tabl
e 55
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
of n
ine
Mat
urity
Gro
up V
Con
vent
iona
l soy
bean
var
ietie
s an
d on
eR
ound
up R
eady
che
ck e
valu
ated
in fo
ur e
nviro
nmen
ts (n
=12)
in T
enne
ssee
for t
hree
yea
rs, 2
009
- 201
1.A
vg. Y
ield
± St
d Er
r.Sp
ringf
ield
Mila
n
B
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
2)K
noxv
ille
Non
-Irr.
Irr.
Non
-Irr.
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---b
u/a-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-N
C E
xpN
CC
04-1
555
54 ±
154
4068
53U
SG
Alle
n (R
R C
heck
)54
± 1
5537
7152
AR
Osa
ge53
± 1
5338
6756
AR
Oza
rk53
± 1
5536
6754
AR
R04
-357
53 ±
155
4067
49U
SG
5601
T53
± 1
5139
6853
VA
Gle
nn52
± 1
4936
6855
US
DA
- N
C E
xpN
02-4
1749
± 1
4437
6251
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-126
148
± 1
4935
6049
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-116
848
± 1
5131
6149
Ave
rage
(bu/
a)52
5237
6652
L.S.
D. .0
5 (b
u/a)
48
68
6C
.V. (
%)
10.1
10.6
12.0
9.5
8.7
† A
ll yi
elds
are
adj
uste
d to
13%
moi
stur
e.‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
61
Tabl
e 56
. M
ean
yiel
ds †
and
agr
onom
ic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
nin
e M
atur
ity G
roup
V C
onve
ntio
nal s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
and
one
Rou
ndup
read
y ch
eck
eval
uate
d in
four
env
ironm
ents
(n=1
2) in
Ten
ness
ee fo
r thr
ee y
ears
, 200
9 - 2
011.
Avg
. Yie
ld
Lea f
Seed
SDS
± St
d Er
r.M
oist
ure
§Lo
dgin
gH
eigh
tM
atur
itySh
atte
ring
Ret
entio
nQ
ualit
yPr
otei
nO
ilFr
ogey
eD
ID
SD
XB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
(n=1
2)(n
=12)
(n=1
0)(n
=12)
(n=1
2)(n
=5)
(n=1
)(n
=3)
(n=3
)(n
=3)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
(n=1
)(n
=1)
bu/a
%S
core
in.
DA
P
----
----
----
- Sco
re --
----
----
----
%%
Sco
re%
0 - 9
inde
xN
C E
xpN
CC
04-1
555
54 ±
113
.41.
734
146
1.0
1.0
2.3
38.2
22.7
1.3
75.0
2.0
16.7
US
GA
llen
(RR
Che
ck)
54 ±
114
.11.
740
147
1.0
1.2
2.4
40.1
21.5
1.5
93.3
3.7
39.3
AR
Osa
ge53
± 1
12.5
1.4
3314
11.
02.
02.
342
.720
.81.
283
.32.
725
.9A
RO
zark
53 ±
113
.51.
936
141
1.0
1.5
1.9
39.4
21.7
1.0
83.3
2.0
18.5
AR
R04
-357
53 ±
113
.12.
638
143
1.0
2.0
2.2
40.6
21.0
1.0
86.7
3.7
36.3
US
G56
01T
53 ±
112
.81.
838
142
1.0
2.5
2.5
41.5
21.4
1.3
100.
03.
337
.0V
AG
lenn
52 ±
113
.12.
231
139
1.0
1.3
2.6
41.0
21.5
1.3
93.3
2.3
24.4
US
DA
- N
C E
xpN
02-4
1749
± 1
13.6
1.6
3314
31.
01.
32.
038
.023
.01.
098
.33.
032
.9N
C E
xpN
CC
05-1
261
48 ±
113
.31.
934
136
1.0
1.0
2.7
40.8
20.8
1.0
45.0
2.3
13.0
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-116
848
± 1
12.7
2.1
3413
61.
01.
72.
940
.421
.31.
050
.02.
314
.4A
vera
ge52
13.2
1.9
3514
11.
01.
62.
440
.321
.61.
280
.82.
725
.8†
All
yiel
ds a
re a
djus
ted
to 1
3% m
oist
ure.
‡ If
a tra
it ap
pear
s in
side
par
enth
eses
i.e.
(RR
), th
en it
is n
ot p
art o
f the
var
iety
nam
e.§
Ave
rage
moi
stur
e at
har
vest
Lodg
ing
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
95%
of p
lant
s er
ect;
2.5
= ~5
0% o
f pla
nts
lean
ing
at a
ngle
≥ 4
5°; 5
= 9
5+%
of p
lant
s le
anin
g at
an
angl
e ≥
45°.
Mat
urity
= d
ays
afte
r pla
ntin
g (D
AP
).S
hatte
ring
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
no
shat
terin
g; 5
= 9
0+%
of p
ods
shat
tere
d.Le
af R
eten
tion
(at h
arve
st) =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of p
lant
s ho
ldin
g le
aves
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity; 5
=95+
% o
f pla
nts
hold
ing
leav
es a
nd g
reen
ste
ms
at h
arve
st m
atur
ity.
See
d Q
ualit
y =
1 to
5 s
cale
; whe
re 1
= <
5%
of s
eeds
sho
win
g di
seas
e or
spl
it se
ed c
oats
; 5 =
95+
% o
f see
d ar
e di
seas
ed o
r hav
e sp
lit s
eed
coat
s.P
rote
in &
Oil
on d
ry w
eigh
t bas
is.
Frog
eye
= 1
to 5
sca
le; w
here
1 =
< 5
% o
f lea
f sur
face
s co
ntai
ning
dis
ease
spo
ts; 5
= 9
5% +
of l
eaf s
urfa
ces
cont
aini
ng d
isea
se s
pots
. Rat
ings
from
Kno
xvill
e on
9/1
/11.
DI =
dis
ease
inci
denc
e =
perc
enta
ge o
f pla
nts
with
sym
ptom
sD
S =
dis
ease
sev
erity
= s
core
of l
eaf c
hlor
osis
and
nec
rosi
s; 0
= n
o sy
mpt
oms;
9 =
pla
nt d
eath
bef
ore
norm
al d
efol
iatio
n du
e to
sen
esce
nce.
DX
= d
isea
se in
dex
= (D
I x D
S /
9); r
atin
gs w
ere
mad
e at
app
roxi
mat
ely
R6
whe
n gr
een
pods
with
see
d ha
ve re
ache
d fu
ll si
ze a
t Kno
xvill
e on
8/2
6/09
.
62
Tabl
e 57
. Cha
ract
eris
tics
of s
oybe
an v
arie
ties
eval
uate
d in
Ten
ness
ee d
urin
g 20
11, a
s pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e se
ed c
ompa
ny.
2011
Rel
ativ
eH
erbi
cide
SCN
Stem
Flow
erPu
besc
ence
Seed
Bra
ndVa
riety
‡Te
stM
atur
ityTo
lera
nce
Res
ista
nce
Can
ker
SDS
Frog
eye
Col
orC
olor
Trea
tmen
tA
RU
A 4
910
Cv/
LL4
4.9
------
---R
RW
TA
pron
Max
xA
RO
sage
Cv/
LL5
5.6
------
RR
RP
GA
pron
Max
xA
RO
zark
Cv/
LL5
5.2
---3
RR
RP
GA
pron
Max
xA
RR
04-3
57C
v/LL
55.
6---
---R
------
PG
Apr
on M
axx
Arm
or44
-R08
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
4R
R2Y
------
MM
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
or46
-R42
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
4R
R2Y
---R
MR
MR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
or46
-R64
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
4R
R2Y
---R
MM
RP
LTA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
48-R
40 (R
R2Y
/STS
)R
R4L
4.8
RR
2Y/S
TS---
MS
MR
MS
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
or48
-R91
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
/STS
---R
MM
RP
LTA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X120
9 (R
R2Y
/STS
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2Y/S
TS---
MR
MM
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
orX1
210
(RR
)R
R4L
4.8
RR
---R
MR
MR
WT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
orX1
211
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
9R
R2Y
---R
MM
SP
LTA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X124
7 (R
R2Y
/STS
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2Y/S
TS---
MS
MR
MS
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
or53
-R15
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
3R
R2Y
---R
MM
RP
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X121
3 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.4
RR
2Y---
R---
RP
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X121
5 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.5
RR
2Y---
R---
RP
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X121
6 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.5
RR
2Y---
R---
MP
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erA
rmor
X121
7 (R
R2Y
/STS
)R
R5E
5.4
RR
2Y/S
TS---
RM
RM
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
or55
-R22
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
5R
R2Y
---R
MR
MR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
orX1
253
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
3R
R2Y
---R
MS
MR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Arm
orX1
255
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
5R
R2Y
---R
MR
MR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
Asg
row
AG
4232
GEN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
RR
4E4.
2R
R2Y
/STS
R3
MR
MS
MS
PLT
Acc
eler
onA
sgro
wA
G45
31 G
ENR
R2Y
(STS
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
2Y/S
TSS
SM
RM
SP
LTA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
4632
GEN
RR
2YR
R4L
4.6
RR
2YM
R3
MR
MS
MR
PLT
Acc
eler
onA
sgro
wA
G47
30 G
ENR
R2Y
(STS
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2Y/S
TSS
SM
SM
SP
LTA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
4732
GEN
RR
2YR
R4L
4.7
RR
2YR
3M
RM
SM
RP
LTA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
4832
GEN
RR
2YR
R4L
4.8
RR
2YR
3M
SM
SM
SP
LTA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
4932
GEN
RR
2YR
R4L
4.9
RR
2YR
3M
RM
RM
RP
TA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
5232
GEN
RR
2YR
R5E
5.2
RR
2YR
3M
SM
SM
SP
GA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
5332
GEN
RR
2YR
R5E
5.3
RR
2YR
3M
RM
SM
RP
TA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
5532
GEN
RR
2YR
R5E
5.5
RR
2YS
MS
---M
SW
GA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
5632
GEN
RR
2Y (S
TS)
RR
5L5.
6R
R2Y
/STS
R3
MR
---M
RW
GA
ccel
eron
Asg
row
AG
5831
GEN
RR
2Y
RR
5L5.
7R
R2Y
SM
SM
RM
SP
TA
ccel
eron
Bec
k's
392N
LC
v/LL
43.
9LL
R3,
MR
14M
RM
RM
RW
LTEs
cala
teB
eck'
s42
6NL
Cv/
LL4
4.2
LLR
3, M
R14
MR
MR
MR
WLT
Esca
late
Bec
k's
456N
LC
v/LL
44.
5LL
R3,
MR
14M
RM
RM
RP
LTEs
cala
teB
eck'
s47
6NL
Cv/
LL4
4.7
LLR
3, M
R14
MR
MR
MR
PG
Esca
late
Bec
k's
XL B
rand
432N
R (R
R/S
TS)
RR
4E4.
3R
R/S
TSR
3, M
R14
MR
MR
MR
PLT
Esca
late
Bec
k's
XL B
rand
477N
R (R
R)
RR
4L4.
7R
RR
3, M
R14
MR
MR
MR
PT
Esca
late
Bec
k's
XL B
rand
495N
RR
R4L
4.9
RR
R3,
MR
14M
RM
RM
RW
TEs
cala
teC
aver
ndal
e Fa
rms
CF
436
RR
2Yn
RR
4E4.
3R
R2Y
R3,
R14
RM
RM
RP
GR
anco
nna,
Met
asta
r, O
ptom
izC
aver
ndal
e Fa
rms
CF
476
RR
2Yn
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
R3,
R14
RM
RM
RP
GR
anco
nna,
Met
asta
r, O
ptom
izC
ropl
anR
2C 4
391
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
3R
R2Y
------
------
PG
Acc
eler
on
63
Tabl
e 57
(con
tinue
d)20
11R
elat
ive
Her
bici
deSC
NSt
emFl
ower
Pube
scen
ceSe
edB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Test
Mat
urity
Tole
ranc
eR
esis
tanc
eC
anke
rSD
SFr
ogey
eC
olor
Col
orTr
eatm
ent
Cro
plan
R2C
452
0 (R
R2Y
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
2YR
3,1
4R
RR
PG
Acc
eler
onC
ropl
anR
2C 4
541
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
5R
R2Y
------
---R
PLT
Acc
eler
onC
ropl
anR
2C 4
801
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
8R
R2Y
---R
SR
PLT
Acc
eler
onC
ropl
anR
C 4
877
RR
RR
4L4.
8R
RR
3R
RR
PT
Acc
eler
onC
ropl
anR
C 5
007S
(RR
/STS
)R
R5E
5.0
RR
/STS
R 3
RR
RW
GA
ccel
eron
Cro
plan
R2C
582
0 (R
R2Y
)R
R5L
5.8
RR
2YR
3, 1
4R
------
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DSR
-380
5/R
2YR
R3
3.8
RR
2YM
R3
------
---W
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR-4
242/
R2Y
RR
4E4.
2R
R2Y
MR
3---
------
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DSR
-430
0 R
RR
R4E
4.3
RR
MR
3---
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DSR
-450
0 R
R/S
TSR
R4E
4.5
RR
/STS
MR
3---
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DST
43-0
01/R
2YR
R4E
4.3
RR
2YR
3---
------
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DST
45-0
01/R
2YR
R4E
4.5
RR
2YR
3---
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DST
45-0
02/R
2YR
R4E
4.5
RR
2YR
3---
------
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
airy
land
DSR
-481
0 R
RR
R4L
4.8
RR
R3
------
---P
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Dai
ryla
ndD
SR-8
482
RR
RR
4L4.
8R
R---
------
---W
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Dai
ryla
ndD
ST47
-002
/R2Y
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
R3
------
---P
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4861
LL
Cv/
LL4
4.8
LL3,
9,14
,r.kn
otR
MR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w54
61 L
LC
v/LL
55.
4LL
3,9,
rt k
not
RR
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4460
RR
RR
4E4.
4R
R3,
14---
------
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w46
70 R
2YR
R4L
4.6
RR
2Y3,
14R
MR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w47
70 R
RR
R4L
4.7
RR
3, 6
, 14
RR
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4875
R2Y
RR
4L4.
8R
R2Y
3,14
RM
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4880
RR
RR
4L4.
8R
R3,
9R
RM
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4970
RR
RR
4L4.
9R
R3,
14
RR
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
4975
RR
RR
4L4.
9R
RS
RR
MR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w51
60 R
R/S
TSR
R5E
5.1
RR
/STS
3, 1
4R
RR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w52
75 R
2YR
R5E
5.2
RR
2Y3,
14
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w52
80 R
RR
R5E
5.2
RR
3,14
, rt k
not
RR
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Del
ta G
row
5300
RR
/STS
RR
5E5.
3R
R/S
TS2,
3,6,
9,14
MR
MR
MR
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w55
45 R
RR
R5E
5.5
RR
3,9,
14R
RR
------
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w55
55 R
RR
R5E
5.5
RR
1,3,
5,9
MR
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xD
elta
Gro
w55
65 R
2YR
R5E
5.5
RR
2Y3
MM
MP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Dyn
a-G
ro31
RY4
5 (R
R2Y
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
2Y3,
14R
MS
RP
LTA
ccel
eron
Dyn
a-G
ro35
X43
(RR
)R
R4E
4.3
RR
MR
3R
RM
SP
LTA
pron
Max
x/G
auch
oD
yna-
Gro
39R
Y43
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
3R
R2Y
3,14
---M
rM
SP
GA
ccel
eron
Dyn
a-G
roV4
2N9R
SR
R4E
4.2
RR
/STS
R 3
, MR
14
RM
RR
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Gau
cho
Dyn
a-G
ro33
RY4
7 (R
R2Y
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2Y3,
14R
MR
RP
LTA
ccel
eron
Dyn
a-G
ro37
RY4
7 (R
R2Y
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2Y/S
TSS
MS
RS
PLT
Acc
eler
onD
yna-
Gro
39D
48 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
R3
RM
RR
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Gau
cho
Dyn
a-G
ro35
P53
(RR
)R
R5E
5.3
RR
2R
MR
RP
GA
pron
Max
x/G
auch
oD
yna-
Gro
37R
Y52
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
2R
R2Y
R3,
MR
14
RM
SR
PG
Acc
eler
onG
oSoy
4411
LL
Cv/
LL4
4.4
LL3
MR
MR
MR
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xG
oSoy
4810
LL
Cv/
LL4
4.8
LL3
MR
MS
---P
GC
ruis
er M
axx
64
Tabl
e 57
(con
tinue
d)20
11R
elat
ive
Her
bici
deSC
NSt
emFl
ower
Pube
scen
ceSe
edB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Test
Mat
urity
Tole
ranc
eR
esis
tanc
eC
anke
rSD
SFr
ogey
eC
olor
Col
orTr
eatm
ent
GoS
oy51
11 L
LC
v/LL
55.
1LL
3M
RM
RM
RP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Hal
o4:
65 (L
L)C
v/LL
44.
6LL
MR
3R
MR
RP
LTTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hal
o4:
75 (L
L)C
v/LL
44.
7LL
---R
---M
RP
TTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hal
o4:
94 (L
L)C
v/LL
44.
9LL
MR
3R
MR
MR
PG
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
alo
5:25
(LL)
Cv/
LL5
5.2
LLM
R 3
RM
RM
RW
TTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hal
o5:
65 (L
L)C
v/LL
55.
6LL
MR
3R
MR
RW
GTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
C 4
926
Cv/
LL4
4.9
---S
3R
---R
PG
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K C
552
8C
v/LL
55.
5---
R 3
R---
RP
TTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
729
(RR
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
MS
3M
R---
MR
PT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
482
9 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
RM
R3
RM
RR
WT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
483
0 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
RS
3R
MS
RS
LTTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
R 4
924
(RR
)R
R4L
4.9
RR
R 3
, MR
14
RM
RM
RP
LTTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
Hor
nbec
kH
BK
RY
4620
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
8R
R2Y
MR
3M
SR
MS
PLT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
522
6 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
2R
RM
R 3
RM
SR
PT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
552
5 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
5R
RM
R 3
,14
RM
RR
PT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0H
ornb
eck
HB
K R
552
9 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
5R
RM
E 1,
2R
MS
RW
TTr
ilex
2000
, Gau
cho
600
MO
Exp
S08-
1736
1C
v/LL
44.
9---
---R
---S
WT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0M
O E
xpS0
8-14
087
(RR
)R
R4L
4.6
RR
---R
---S
PLT
Trile
x 20
00, G
auch
o 60
0M
orso
y Xt
ra46
X29
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
RR
4L4.
6R
R2Y
/STS
------
------
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xM
orso
y Xt
ra46
X71
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
6R
R2
3,14
R---
RP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Mor
soy
Xtra
47X3
1 (R
R2Y
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
2---
R---
RP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Mor
soy
Xtra
48X0
0 (R
R2Y
/STS
)R
R4L
4.8
RR
2Y/S
TS---
MR
------
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xM
orso
y Xt
ra49
X10
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
9R
R2Y
---M
R---
---P
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Mor
soy
Xtra
51X3
1 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.1
RR
2---
S---
RW
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Mor
soy
Xtra
53X5
1 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.3
RR
2---
R---
SP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Mor
soy
Xtra
54X4
1 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.4
RR
2---
RM
RR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xN
C E
xpN
CC
06-3
39C
v/LL
44.
9---
------
------
PT
Thira
m C
ruis
erN
C E
xpN
CC
04-1
555
Cv/
LL5
5.7
------
------
---P
TTh
iram
Cru
iser
NC
Exp
NC
C05
-116
8C
v/LL
55.
0---
------
------
WG
Thira
m C
ruis
erN
C E
xpN
CC
05-1
261
Cv/
LL5
5.0
------
------
---W
GTh
iram
Cru
iser
NC
Exp
NC
C06
-218
8C
v/LL
55.
6---
------
------
WG
Thira
m C
ruis
erN
C E
xpN
CC
06-5
79C
v/LL
55.
8---
------
------
PG
Thira
m C
ruis
erN
KS
38-H
8 (R
R)
RR
33.
8R
RR
3, M
R 1
4R
SS
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xN
KS
39-U
2 (R
R2Y
)R
R3
3.9
RR
2YR
3, 1
4---
RS
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xN
KS
44-D
5 B
rand
(RR
)R
R4E
4.4
RR
R 3
,14
RR
SW
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
NK
S 46
-A1
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
6R
R2Y
R3,
MR
14
RR
SP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
NK
S 47
-R3
Bra
nd (R
R)
RR
4L4.
7R
RR
3, M
R 1
4R
RR
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xN
KS
49-A
5 B
rand
(RR
)R
R4L
4.9
RR
R 3
, MS
14R
RR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xN
KS
51-J
3 (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.1
RR
2YM
R 3
, 14
---S
RP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
NK
S 51
-T8
Bra
nd (R
R)
RR
5E5.
1R
RR
3, M
R 1
4R
RS
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y49
10C
v/LL
44.
9---
R 3
,MR
14
RS
RS
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
4928
LL
Cv/
LL4
4.9
LLM
R3
------
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y51
91C
v/LL
55.
1---
---M
SR
RW
TC
ruis
er M
axx
65
Tabl
e 57
(con
tinue
d)20
11R
elat
ive
Her
bici
deSC
NSt
emFl
ower
Pube
scen
ceSe
edB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Test
Mat
urity
Tole
ranc
eR
esis
tanc
eC
anke
rSD
SFr
ogey
eC
olor
Col
orTr
eatm
ent
Prog
eny
5770
Cv/
LL5
5.7
---R
3, M
R 6
,9R
RT
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y51
60 L
LC
v/LL
55.
1LL
---M
RM
RM
RW
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5261
LL
Cv/
LL5
5.2
LL---
MR
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y54
60 L
LC
v/LL
55.
4LL
---M
RM
SM
RP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5960
LL
Cv/
LL5
5.9
LL---
MR
MR
MR
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y39
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)R
R3
3.9
RR
2Y---
RR
RP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
4211
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
2R
R2Y
------
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y45
10 R
Y (R
R2Y
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
2Y---
MS
RS
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y46
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)R
R4L
4.6
RR
2Y---
RM
SM
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
4710
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
---M
SM
RM
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
4811
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
8R
R2Y
---R
MS
MR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y49
06 R
RR
R4L
4.9
RR
---S
MR
MR
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y49
08 R
RR
R4L
4.9
RR
MR
3M
RM
RM
RW
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
4911
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
9R
R2Y
---M
SM
RM
SP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5111
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
1R
R2Y
---M
SM
SM
RW
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5210
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
2R
R2Y
R3,
MR
14R
MS
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y53
21 R
Y (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.3
RR
2Y---
MR
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y53
30 R
RR
R5E
5.3
RR
R 1
, MR
2R
MR
RP
TC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5610
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
5L5.
6R
R2Y
R3,
MR
14---
---M
SP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5655
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
5L5.
6R
R2Y
---M
SM
SM
SW
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Prog
eny
5711
RY
(RR
2Y)
RR
5L5.
7R
R2Y
---M
S---
MS
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xPr
ogen
y58
11 R
Y (R
R2Y
)R
R5L
5.8
RR
2Y---
R---
RP
GC
ruis
er M
axx
Schi
lling
er S
eed
458
RC
SR
R4E
4.5
RR
/STS
R 3
RM
SR
WLT
Cru
iser
Max
xSc
hilli
nger
See
d47
8 R
CS
RR
4L4.
7R
R/S
TS3
RM
RM
SP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Schi
lling
er S
eed
495
RC
RR
4L4.
9R
RR
3R
SR
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xSc
hilli
nger
See
d49
90 R
CR
R4L
4.9
RR
R 3
RM
RM
RP
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Schi
lling
er S
eed
5220
RC
RR
5E5.
2R
R3
R---
---W
LTC
ruis
er M
axx
Schi
lling
er S
eed
557
RC
RR
5E5.
5R
RR
3R
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xSt
eyer
4430
RR
(STS
)R
R4E
4.4
RR
/STS
R 3
, MR
14
SM
RM
RP
TTr
ilex,
Alle
gian
ce, G
auch
oSt
eyer
4501
R2
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
RR
4E4.
5R
R2Y
/STS
R 3
, MR
14
SM
RM
SP
LTTr
ilex,
Alle
gian
ce, G
auch
oSt
eyer
4701
R2
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
R 3
, MR
14
------
------
---Tr
ilex,
Alle
gian
ce, G
auch
oSt
eyer
4710
RR
RR
4L4.
7R
RR
3, M
R 1
4S
MR
MR
PT
Trile
x,A
llegi
ance
, Gau
cho
Stin
e43
LC23
(LL)
Cv/
LL4
4.3
LL---
------
------
---C
ruis
er M
axx
Stin
e45
LC82
(LL)
Cv/
LL4
4.5
LL---
------
------
---C
ruis
er M
axx
Stin
e47
LC32
(LL)
Cv/
LL4
4.7
LL---
------
------
---C
ruis
er M
axx
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
38R
10 (R
R)
RR
33.
8R
R3
---R
RP
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
44R
22 (R
R)
RR
4E4.
4R
R---
---M
RR
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd45
R10
(RR
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
3M
RM
RS
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd47
R22
(RR
)R
R4L
4.7
RR
------
RM
RW
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
47R
53 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
7R
R---
------
------
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
48R
10 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
R3
RM
RS
WT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd48
R21
(RR
)R
R4L
4.8
RR
------
MR
SP
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
48R
22 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
R---
---M
RS
WT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
y
66
Tabl
e 57
(con
tinue
d)20
11R
elat
ive
Her
bici
deSC
NSt
emFl
ower
Pube
scen
ceSe
edB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Test
Mat
urity
Tole
ranc
eR
esis
tanc
eC
anke
rSD
SFr
ogey
eC
olor
Col
orTr
eatm
ent
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
48R
33 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
8R
R---
------
------
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
49R
10 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
9R
R9
MR
MR
SW
TA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
49R
11 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
9R
R3
RM
RS
WT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd49
R22
(RR
)R
R4L
4.9
RR
------
R---
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd49
R43
(RR
)R
R4L
4.9
RR
------
------
---T
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd51
R53
(RR
)R
R5E
5.1
RR
------
------
---T
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd54
R10
(RR
)R
R5E
5.4
RR
3R
MR
SP
GA
pron
Max
x/M
oly
Terr
al-R
EV B
rand
55R
21 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
5R
R3
RM
RR
WG
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTe
rral
-REV
Bra
nd56
R21
(RR
)R
R5L
5.6
RR
---M
RM
RS
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Mol
yTN
Exp
TN05
-501
8C
v/LL
44.
9---
------
------
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-016
Cv/
LL4
4.9
---3,
14
------
---P
TC
ruis
er M
axx
TN E
xpTN
09-0
29C
v/LL
44.
8---
2, 3
, 14
------
---P
TC
ruis
er M
axx
TN E
xpTN
10-4
037
Cv/
LL4
4.3
------
------
---W
GC
ruis
er M
axx
TN E
xpTN
09-0
08C
v/LL
55.
1---
2, 1
4---
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-45,
432
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
1R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-46,
551
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
3R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-47,
024
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
4R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-47,
387
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
0R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-46,
128
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-48,
343
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
9R
R2Y
------
------
------
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-48,
552
(RR
2Y)
RR
4L4.
9R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-46,
277
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
5R
R2Y
------
------
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-48,
205
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
5R
R2Y
------
------
------
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-44,
121
(RR
2Y)
RR
5L5.
9R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xTN
Exp
TN09
-48,
263
(RR
2Y)
RR
5L5.
9R
R2Y
------
------
PT
Cru
iser
Max
xU
SDA
- N
C E
xpN
02-4
17C
v/LL
55.
5---
------
------
PG
Apr
on M
axx
USD
A-T
NJT
N-4
408
Cv/
LL5
5.0
---M
R 2
, R 3
,14
MR
MR
RW
TA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SDA
-TN
JTN
-511
0C
v/LL
55.
5---
2,3
R---
---P
TA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SDA
-TN
JTN
-520
3C
v/LL
55.
3---
2, 3
, 14
RR
RW
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG74
A91
(RR
Che
ck)
Cv/
LL4
4.9
RR
------
MR
MR
PLT
Cru
iser
Max
xU
SG74
B58
(RR
Che
ck)
Cv/
LL4
4.5
RR
/STS
R 3
, MR
14
RM
RS
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
74G
99L
(LL)
Cv/
LL4
4.9
LL---
---M
RR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
5601
TC
v/LL
55.
6---
------
MR
MR
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xU
SG75
J32
(RR
Che
ck)
Cv/
LL5
5.3
RR
MR
3,1
4R
MR
MR
PG
Cru
iser
Max
xU
SGA
llen
(RR
Che
ck)
Cv/
LL5
5.6
RR
------
MR
MR
WG
Cru
iser
Max
xU
SG74
B58
(RR
/STS
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
/STS
R 3
, MR
14
RM
RS
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
74D
41R
(RR
2Y)
RR
4E4.
4R
R2Y
------
MR
MR
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
74F1
1R (R
R2Y
)R
R4E
4.1
RR
2YM
R 3
---M
RM
RW
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG74
H81
(RR
)R
R4E
4.5
RR
R3,
MR
14---
------
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
74A
79R
(RR
2Y/S
TS)
RR
4L4.
7R
R2Y
/STS
---M
SM
R---
PLT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
74A
91 (R
R)
RR
4L4.
9R
R---
---M
RM
RP
LTA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG74
E88
(RR
)R
R4L
4.6
RR
M 3
RM
R---
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
7553
nRS
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
5R
R2Y
---S
MR
MR
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
67
Tabl
e 57
(con
tinue
d)20
11R
elat
ive
Her
bici
deSC
NSt
emFl
ower
Pube
scen
ceSe
edB
rand
Varie
ty ‡
Test
Mat
urity
Tole
ranc
eR
esis
tanc
eC
anke
rSD
SFr
ogey
eC
olor
Col
orTr
eatm
ent
USG
75B
21R
(RR
2Y)
RR
5E5.
2R
R2Y
R 3
MR
MR
MR
PT
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
75J3
2 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
3R
RM
R 3
,14
RM
RM
RP
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG75
M49
(RR
)R
R5E
5.4
RR
MR
3R
MR
RW
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG75
R31
R (R
R2Y
)R
R5E
5.3
RR
2Y---
------
MR
PG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
75T1
8 (R
R)
RR
5E5.
1R
RM
R 3
,14
---R
---P
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erU
SG75
T40
(RR
)R
R5E
5.3
RR
------
------
WG
Apr
onM
axx/
Cru
iser
USG
Alle
n (R
R)
RR
5L5.
6R
R---
---M
RM
RW
GA
pron
Max
x/C
ruis
erVA
Han
over
Cv/
LL4
4.9
------
------
---P
TC
ruis
er M
axx
VAG
lenn
Cv/
LL5
5.3
---2,
3R
------
WT
Cru
iser
Max
xR
R /
RR
2Y =
Con
tain
s a
gene
for t
oler
ance
to g
lyph
osat
e he
rbic
ide;
STS
= to
lera
nce
to s
ulfo
nylu
rea
clas
s of
her
bici
des;
LL
= co
ntai
ns a
gen
e fo
r tol
eran
ce to
glu
fosi
nate
her
bici
de.
R =
resi
stan
t, M
R =
mod
erat
ely
resi
stan
t, M
S =
mod
erat
ely
susc
eptib
le, S
= s
usce
ptib
le, V
S =
ver
y su
scep
tible
.Fl
ower
& P
ubes
cenc
e co
lors
:P =
pur
ple,
W =
whi
te, S
= s
egre
gatin
g, T
= ta
wny
, LT
= lig
ht ta
wny
, B =
Bro
wn,
G =
gra
y.M
ost i
nfor
mat
ion
supp
lied
by c
ompa
nies
.R
R3
= R
ound
up R
eady
3R
5E =
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy E
arly
Gro
up 5
R4E
= R
ound
up R
eady
Ear
ly G
roup
4R
5L =
Rou
ndup
Rea
dy L
ate
Gro
up 5
R4L
= R
ound
up R
eady
Lat
e G
roup
4C
v/LL
4, C
v/LL
5 =
Con
vent
iona
l Gro
up 4
& 5
(with
LL
& R
R C
heck
s)‡
If a
trait
appe
ars
insi
de p
aren
thes
es i.
e. (R
R),
then
it is
not
par
t of t
he v
arie
ty n
ame.
68
Tabl
e 58
. Con
tact
info
rmat
ion
for s
oybe
an s
eed
com
pani
es e
valu
ated
in y
ield
test
s in
Ten
ness
ee d
urin
g 20
11.
Com
pany
Con
tact
Phon
eEm
ail
Web
site
Add
ress
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
sP
engy
in C
hen
479-
575-
7564
pche
n@ua
rk.e
duD
ept o
f Cro
p, S
oil &
Env
. Sci
ence
s11
5 P
lant
Sci
ence
Bld
gFa
yette
ville
, AK
727
01
Arm
or S
eed
877-
336-
2290
ww
w.a
rmor
seed
.com
2528
Ale
xand
er D
rive,
Jon
esbo
ro, A
R 7
2401
Lane
Dill
901-
233-
0274
lane
dill@
arm
orse
ed.c
omP
.O. B
ox 1
78, F
ishe
r, A
R 7
2429
Jim
my
Wra
y27
0-83
2-38
43jim
myw
ray@
arm
orse
ed.c
om64
97 T
urne
r Lan
ding
Rd.
, LaC
ente
r, K
Y 4
2056
Asg
row
(Mon
sant
o)La
rry
Gan
ann
901-
3267
140
larr
y.w
.gan
ann@
mon
sant
o.co
mw
ww
.asg
row
andd
ekal
b.co
m
Bec
k's
Sup
erio
r Hyb
rids
800-
937-
2325
ww
w.b
ecks
hybr
ids.
com
6767
Eas
t 276
th S
treet
, Atla
nta,
IN 4
6031
(Bec
k's
& X
L B
rand
)
Cav
ernd
ale
Farm
sB
arry
Wel
ty85
9-23
6-21
50bw
elty
@ky
wim
ax.c
omw
ww
.cav
ernd
alef
arm
s.co
m19
21 B
lueg
rass
Pik
e, D
anvi
lle, K
Y 4
0422
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
sJe
sse
Witt
256-
221-
5932
JBW
itt@
land
olak
es.c
omw
ww
.cro
plan
gene
tics.
com
Con
solid
ated
Ag
Pro
duct
s (A
grili
ance
)(L
and
o La
kes)
Kei
th S
aum
731-
610-
7006
kdsa
um@
land
olak
es.c
oman
dD
arrin
Hol
der
270-
207-
0190
Tenn
esse
e Fa
rmer
s C
o-op
Jim
Pay
ne90
1-65
2-09
03jp
ayne
@ou
rcoo
p.co
mw
ww
.our
coop
.com
Loca
tions
Ash
ley
Ply
mal
e27
0-71
9-15
70M
att S
owde
r90
1-35
5-72
67
Dai
ryla
nd S
eed
Co
Lann
y W
arre
n73
1-23
4-29
21la
nny.
war
ren@
char
ter.n
etw
ww
.dai
ryla
ndse
ed.c
om20
8 S
outh
Tho
mps
on S
t., U
nion
City
, TN
382
61
Del
ta G
row
See
dLe
e H
ughe
s80
0-53
0-79
33le
ehug
hes1
9@ho
tmai
l.com
ww
w.d
elta
grow
.com
P O
Box
219
, Eng
land
, AR
720
46
Dyn
a-G
roTo
dd T
heob
ald
731-
885-
1212
todd
.theo
bald
@cp
sagu
.com
ww
w.d
ynag
rose
ed.c
om71
0 S
. Firs
t Stre
et, U
nion
City
, TN
382
61(C
rop
Pro
duct
ion
Ser
vice
s)
GoS
oy (S
tratto
n S
eed
Co.
)Ji
m C
raig
870-
673-
4433
jcra
ig@
stra
ttons
eed.
com
ww
w.s
tratto
nsee
d.co
m15
30 H
wy
79 S
outh
, Stu
ttgar
t, A
R 7
2160
Sco
oter
Hod
ges
shod
ges@
stra
ttons
eed.
com
Hal
o (U
S S
eeds
)Ja
mie
Boo
ne87
0-33
6-01
11ja
mie
boon
e@us
seed
s.ne
t25
28 A
lexa
nder
Driv
e, J
ones
boro
, AR
724
01
Hor
nbec
k S
eed
Co
Mon
te M
alon
e87
0-35
1-03
90m
onty
.mal
one@
baye
r.com
ww
w.h
bkse
ed.c
omP
O B
ox 4
72, 2
10 D
rier R
d, D
eWitt
, AR
720
42S
unni
Boo
ker
501-
472-
2507
sunn
i.boo
ker@
baye
r.com
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mis
sour
i, 14
7 S
tate
Hw
y T
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mis
sour
iG
rove
r Sha
nnon
573-
379-
5431
shan
nong
@m
isso
uri.e
duP
arta
gevi
lle, M
O 6
3873
Mor
soy
Xtra
Josh
Rup
ard
870-
897-
9112
josh
r@cr
vsee
d.co
mw
ww
.crv
seed
.com
P.O
. Box
10,
Cas
h, A
R 7
2421
(Cac
he R
iver
Val
ley
See
d)
NK
Bra
nd (S
ynge
nta)
Mik
e S
axto
n27
0-74
5-73
33m
ike.
saxt
on@
syng
enta
.com
ww
w.n
k-us
.com
424
Jam
ie W
ayB
owlin
g G
reen
, KY
421
04
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Sta
te U
niv.
And
rea
Car
dina
l91
9-51
3-09
13an
drea
_car
dina
l@nc
su.c
om
69
Tabl
e 58
(con
tinue
d)C
ompa
nyC
onta
ctPh
one
Emai
lW
eb s
iteA
ddre
ss
Pro
geny
(Erw
in K
eith
See
d In
c)B
rian
Mur
ray
870-
238-
2079
bmur
ray@
prog
enya
g.co
mw
ww
.pro
geny
ag.c
om15
29 H
wy
193,
Wyn
ne, A
R 7
2396
Sch
illin
ger G
enet
ics
and
Jim
Cra
ig80
0-26
4-44
33jc
raig
@st
ratto
nsee
d.co
mw
ww
.eM
erge
Gen
etic
s.co
m44
01 W
esto
wn
Par
kway
, Sui
te 2
25
e
Mer
ge G
enet
ics
Cor
y N
ikke
l51
5-22
5-11
66cn
ikki
el@
schi
llgen
.com
Wes
t Des
Moi
nes,
IA 5
0266
Ste
yer S
eeds
Phi
l Cof
fman
270-
832-
7362
ww
w.s
teye
rsee
ds.c
omC
lay,
KY
Tom
Jon
es27
0-21
3-00
20S
ebre
e, K
YJo
e S
teye
r80
0-23
1-42
74jo
este
yer@
yaho
o.co
m61
54 N
. Co.
Rd.
33,
Tiff
in, O
H 4
4883
Stin
eB
rian
Cor
nelio
us90
1-57
4-22
13br
ianc
@m
erte
cllc
.com
ww
w.s
tines
eed.
com
252
Bla
ir D
rive,
Mar
ion,
AR
723
64
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ten
ness
eeV
ince
Pan
talo
ne86
5-97
4-88
01vp
anta
lo@
utk.
edu
Dep
t. of
Pla
nt S
cien
ces,
Elli
ngto
n 25
224
31 J
oe J
ohns
on D
rive
Kno
xvill
e, T
N 3
7996
-456
1
Terr
al S
eed
Inc
Larr
y M
ulle
n31
8-23
1-88
11lm
ulle
n@te
rral
seed
.com
ww
w.te
rral
seed
.com
P O
Box
826
, Lak
e P
rovi
denc
e, L
A 7
1254
US
DA
-AR
S N
CLi
llian
Mira
nda
919-
856-
4387
lillia
m.m
irand
a@ar
s.us
da.g
ov
US
DA
-AR
S T
NP
raka
sh A
relli
731-
425-
4736
pare
lli@
ars.
usda
.gov
605
Airw
ays
Blv
d, J
acks
on, T
N 3
8301
Uni
sout
h G
enet
ics
(US
G)
Sta
cy B
urw
ick
800-
505-
3133
sbur
wic
k@us
gsee
d.co
mw
ww
.usg
seed
.com
3205
-C H
ighw
ay 4
6S, D
icks
on, T
N 3
7055
Dav
id F
andr
ich
931-
967-
3377
fand
richs
uppl
y@ao
l.com
Fand
rich
Sup
ply
Co,
Bel
vide
re, T
NM
ark
Huf
fste
tler
731-
235-
2167
huffy
1@cr
unet
.com
Huf
fste
tler &
Son
s S
eed
Inc,
Gre
enfie
ld, T
NTr
ey H
urt
731-
836-
7574
treyh
urt@
bells
outh
.com
Hur
t See
d C
o. In
c, H
alls
, TN
Wes
Mill
er73
1-53
6-62
51w
es@
obio
ngra
in.c
omO
bion
Gra
in C
o. In
c, O
bion
, TN
Bill
y S
elle
rs73
1-53
8-29
90S
elle
rs S
eed,
Obi
on, T
N
Virg
inia
Tec
hB
ruce
Bea
hm80
4-74
6-48
84bb
eahm
@riv
net.n
etw
ww
.virg
inia
crop
.org
Virg
inia
Cro
p Im
prov
emen
t Ass
oc.
Kat
y R
aine
y54
0-23
1-64
96km
rain
ey@
vt.e
duP
.O. B
ox 7
8M
t. H
olly
, VA
225
24
70
Research Report 12-03 2M 1/12 12-0092 R12-2816-032-005-12
The University of Tennessee is an EEO/AA/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA/ADEA institution in the provision of its education and employment programs and services. All qualified applicants will receive equal consideration for employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
pregnancy, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, physical or mental disability, or covered veteran status.
