Nutrient Trading: Principles and Issues April 7, 2006 presentation to Potomac Watershed Roundtable.
Pennsylvania’s proposed changes to nutrient trading program
-
Upload
jan-jarrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
22 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Pennsylvania’s proposed changes to nutrient trading program
Pennsylvania’s Nutrient Credit Trading Program
What clean water advocates need to know
Chesapeake Bay is in serious trouble
Susquehanna provides ½ of the Bay’s fresh water
Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia have been cooperating in cleanup for 25 years
Major pollutants are nitrogen and phosphorus (nutrients) and sediment
Most of the pollution comes from agriculture
Cleaning up the Susquehanna Cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay
The 2010 Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load – required reductions by 2025:
Nitrogen 33 million pounds
Phosphorus 1 million pounds
Sediment 524 million pounds
Pollution caps and required reductions – the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Developed by DEP to meet voluntary Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy goals
Goal Achieve reductions in nitrogen and phosphorus pollution at
lower cost
Method - Allow sewage treatment plants to comply with their nutrient caps by purchasing credits rather than by installing new, expensive pollution control technology from: other sewage treatment plants that reduce pollution below
requirements
farming operations that comply with all requirements and install extra practices to get greater reductions
Pennsylvania’s Trading Program
How does nutrient credit trading work?
Sewage treatment plant discharges 10,000 pounds of nitrogen – must reduce to 7,500 pounds – cost to upgrade $1 million
Farms already in compliance with pollution control requirements go further and install extra conservation measures and generate nitrogen credits
Plant buys 2500 nutrient credits at $15/lb for 10 years
Credits cost $375,000 – Plant saves $625,000
Where do credits come from?
Farm, business or municipality proposes a project that reduces nutrient pollution below what is required by law
DEP reviews proposal and approves or rejects the proposal – if approved, the amount of reduction is “certified” creating a credit – project need not be installed, but a verification plan must be in place outlining how the reduction will be demonstrated
Buyers and sellers enter into a contract specifying price per pound of reduction and length of sale. Buyers can buy directly from a credit generator, buy from a company that bundles credits or participate in the PENNVEST nutrient credit auctions
DEP registers the credits – once registered, the credits can be used by a discharger to comply with its permit limits – registration is noticed in the PA Bulletin
Credits Certified Nitrogen Phosphorus
4,877,721 358,170
Credits Verified
WWTFs – treatment 275,993 27,576
WWTFs – under capacity 761,105 44,782
Ag non-point 32,981 443
Manure Hauling 136,966 17,119
Credits Registered 533,188 25,527
Current Credits Available
If trades occur between a downstream seller and upstream buyer, or between buyers and sellers in different watersheds, local water quality could get worse
Estimates of reductions attributable to agricultural BMPs may be too high and installed BMPs may fail
Minimum level of compliance with clean water requirements must be strong enough to guarantee that reductions are truly extra – beyond what would be achieved by simple compliance with the law
What could go wrong?
Some important definitions
Baseline =Compliance with all legal requirements
Threshold = A set of extra practices that must be installed if an entity wants to trade
Minimum requirements – the all-important baseline and threshold
Current baseline Must be in compliance and implementing nutrient
management, manure management and erosion and sedimentation plans
Current threshold – must have of the following three practices:
100 foot manure setback
35 foot vegetative buffer
Reduce nutrient 20% below requirement
What’s a trading ratio
Margin of safety that an non-point source pollution reduction practice will deliver adequate reductions to Chesapeake Bay
PA’s safety ratio is 1:1 reduced by 10%, reduced further by delivery ratios and edge of segment ratios
For example:
Farmer X installs practices to reduce N pollution by 100 pounds per year – reduction to Chesapeake Bay calculated at 66 pounds per year – 10% reserve requirement leaves 60 credits for sale
EPA evaluation based on optimistic assumptions found PA’s trading baseline:
Falls short of meeting TMDL allocation for nitrogen by 41 percent
Falls short of meeting TMDL allocation for phosphorus by 9 percent
Falls short of meeting TMDL allocation for sediment by 4 percent
EPA Evaluation PA’s Trading Program Inadequate
DEP’S Proposed Changes to Trading Program Threshold
Non-point source
No change until 9/30/15
Existing credits will expire 2015
After 2015 – performance based adjusted with new stricter trading ratio
No more credits for manure hauling
Point source
No credits for under capacity
2014 – must achieve treatment of 8 mg/l TN, 1 mg/l TP
2015 – must achieve treatment of 6 mg/l TN, 0.8 mg/l TP
No trading ratio
Certify by location (current program)
Certify by pollution reduction activity Certify common practices
Register aggregators, individuals expected to generate credits
Certify “approved generators” Define pollution reduction activities and general area
Identify qualifications
Tailored process For forward sale – detailed review, definition of sites
For spot sale – end of year, once and done, expidited verification based on pre-certification
DEP considering options for credit certification
Verification plan needed for credit registration
Program currently allows self-verification
DEP proposes random audits done by private contractor with priority for certification application comments and complaints
CURRENTLY NO FUNDING
Key consideration credit verification
Conflicts of interest
Acts as lender for sewage plant upgrades
Acts as seller in nutrient credit marketplace
Acts as liaison between buyers and sellers
Does not protect interests of purchasers
Does not disclose unsuccessful buyers and sellers
Problems with PENNVEST auction
NO NEW CREDIT CERTIFICATIONS UNTIL BASELINE MEETS REDUCTION GOALS
Baseline requirements must at least meet TMDL agricultural load allocation – if not, there are no extra reductions to trade
No self-verification, annual verification of compliance with baseline and threshold
DEP should charge fee to process credit applications to fund verification program, administration of trading program
Credit calculations must be done on site-specific basis to ensure operation meets baseline and threshold
Trading ratio must include retirement of credits
Discontinue or reform PENNVEST auction to eliminate conflicts of interest
Our recommendations
DEP will change program through policy guidance where possible
DEP will begin to develop regulations
Will run changes by appropriate advisory groups
The public will have the opportunity to comment once changes are published
What’s next?
Pennsylvania’s Trading Program – DEP official site - http://www.dep.state.pa.us/river/Nutrient%20Trading.htm
Chesapeake Bay Commission Economic Study - http://www.chesbay.us/Publications/nutrient-trading-2012.pdf
PennFuture’s evaluation of Pennsylvania’s trading program http://www.pennfuture.org/UserFiles/File/Water/RespFarm/Report_NutrientTradingEval_20110919.pdf
Conservation Pennsylvania’s comment letter -
Resources