PE etraining mtg

44

description

ADPH – PUBLIC HEALTH AREA VIII TRAINING FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS And Associated Onsite System Professionals

Transcript of PE etraining mtg

Page 1: PE etraining mtg
Page 2: PE etraining mtg
Page 3: PE etraining mtg

One of the 6 factors (Rule 420-3-1-.71)Certain limits for OSS on steeper slopes

There are 4 soil related factors And 2 site related factors

All are to be evaluated on each site

Page 4: PE etraining mtg

What is the slope?% Slope = (Rise ÷ Run) x 100

Rise

Run

40 ft

100 ft% Slope =

(40/100) x 100 = 40%

Page 5: PE etraining mtg

• Requires Engineer Design• Start with Table 4 in Rules• Rules require

Deeper trenches More space between trenchesMore cover over trenches

Page 6: PE etraining mtg

MinimumTrench

Depth**

MinimumCover

Percent Slope

Trench Spacing (Side Wall to Side Wall)*

26-30 6 feet 28” 16”31-40 7 feet 33” 21”

Page 7: PE etraining mtg

Table 4SlopeSpacing of TrenchesBased on Width of Trenchand Slope

* The distances between trenches are measured between adjacent sidewalls.

** If the minimum trench depth is measured on the downhill side of the trench, the minimum cover as listed in the table should be assured.

Page 8: PE etraining mtg

Some general guidelines are:• Make a detailed evaluation of the site to

determine optionsGenerally, the larger the lot, the more optionsThe steeper the slope, the more difficult to overcome

• Select the best location and landform• Keep it as simple as possible• Use a pump (effluent) if needed• Renew your liability insurance

Then:• If it doesn’t pass the “feel good” test; walk away

Page 9: PE etraining mtg

• Gravity • Erosion • Soil Stability • Variable Soil Depth• Shallow Rock• Surface Water• Spring Activity

Page 10: PE etraining mtg

Certain Landforms• Headslopes• Toeslopes• Depressions• (These are all concave

shapes)

• Also:• Drains• Rock Outcrops• Complex Slopes

Page 11: PE etraining mtg
Page 12: PE etraining mtg

Focus On The Better Landforms Where Waters Diverge• Convex Ridges,

Sideslopes

Page 13: PE etraining mtg
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Another view of slope names.
Page 14: PE etraining mtg

Requires deep soils

Must meet setbacks• Uphill • Downhill• Over Rock

Page 15: PE etraining mtg
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The steeper the slope, the deeper the cut must be to have enough space to install. We can’t just bench line by line (Unless there is a large area to be used), but must bench out for the entire system. 10’ cut compared on different slopes.
Page 16: PE etraining mtg

.67(2)c Requires geologist’s report & PSC map

(subject to LHD)

Page 17: PE etraining mtg
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Conventional Situation – Cut has no restriction per .67 (or .95) – 15’ setback due to treatment used Three lines 1 and 2 deep enough – no cover Line 3 – Entire trench is in ground but needs cover. Pushover can be used if it meets rules.
Page 18: PE etraining mtg

.67(2)f Does not allow downhill pushover fill for EDF for >25% slope

Page 19: PE etraining mtg
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Conventional Situation - No restriction – Treatment to reduce setback Lines 1-3 – same as previous Line 4 – In pushover, NOT ALLOWED 9>67, (.95))
Page 20: PE etraining mtg

The amount of wastewater that can be applied each day over an indefinite period of time to a square foot of soil such that the effluent is absorbed and properly treated.

Page 21: PE etraining mtg

Horizontal Flow

1

2

3

Presenter
Presentation Notes
On any given septic system 3 zones of infiltration or infiltrative surfaces need to be considered. Zone A is the trench bottom and biomat, zone B is the most limiting zone below the trench, and zone C is the “window” or horizontal zone that water must move through as it moves down gradient from the system. The ability to keep the system aerobic will depend on not exceed the hydraulic conductivity of the most limiting of these layers, thus the most limiting layer is the ones that must be considered for design purposes.
Page 22: PE etraining mtg

If Benching is proposed• Setbacks may be difficult to meet• 25’ setback from uphill cut unless pretreatment• 25’ setback from downhill slope over 40%

Consider Drip technology

Page 23: PE etraining mtg

Try to read and interpret • Landforms• Soils• Water movement & concentration

Use these to best advantage – avoid bad locationsDesign for the long termCall in other professionals if needed

Page 24: PE etraining mtg
Page 25: PE etraining mtg

PermeabilityDepth To ASHES (ave seasonal high extended saturation)Depth To Rock and Other RestrictionsSlope and Landform LimitationsFlooding FrequencyHydric Soils

Page 26: PE etraining mtg

ABILITY OF SOIL TO ALLOW WATER TO PASS THRU IT

Permeability is affected by anything that affects PORES (pathways for water to travel)

TextureStructureConsistenceBulk DensityClay MineralogyDissimilar Layers

Page 27: PE etraining mtg
Page 28: PE etraining mtg

From Surface To Gray Colors Chroma 2 or less2% or more of the volume6” or more thick

Page 29: PE etraining mtg

>2%

6”Thick

Page 30: PE etraining mtg

OBVIOUS COLOR CONTRAST LESS OBVIOUS

Page 31: PE etraining mtg
Page 32: PE etraining mtg

HARD VS. SOFT ROCK

Page 33: PE etraining mtg

THEY SAID DIDN’T FLOODWATER FRONT LOTS FOR SALE

Page 34: PE etraining mtg

SOUTH AL HYDRIC SOIL NORTH AL HYDRIC SOIL

Page 35: PE etraining mtg

If perc test are used check results against what the soil says

Some signs are obviousSome are more subtle

Page 36: PE etraining mtg

A 10 min/Inch perc rate during the dry season in a sticky, plastic clay in an area dominated by cedars and red buds is a...

Non-Representative Perc Result.

Page 37: PE etraining mtg

A 10 Min/Inch Perc Rate In A Soil With A Sandy Loam Texture

But Has A High Bulk Density Layer at ~ 24” (Fragipan)

Is Also Non-Representative

Page 38: PE etraining mtg

A 10 min/inch perc rate at 12” in this sandy topsoil is likely

System may actually be underdesigned for the long term

Because of the clay texture just below.

Page 39: PE etraining mtg

Consider all 6 factors or limitations

Interpret the soil and site characteristics

Compare test results w/ what’s present

If questions arise – ask for assistance

If we can a avoid a problem down the road - we all win

Page 40: PE etraining mtg
Page 41: PE etraining mtg

Filling a drainage channel for an EDF is not recommendedMost undisturbed natural soils are stable• They can be trusted to stay in place and retain

their integrityFill requires time to develop stability• Or use stabilizing practices

Establish vegetationRetaining wallsExtended shoulders (aprons)

Page 42: PE etraining mtg
Page 43: PE etraining mtg

SYSTEM CONVENTIONAL ENGINEERED

LIMITATION SLIGHT MODERATE SEVERE EXTREME

AT Required1. Percolation(Min/In) (1) 5-30 31-90 91-120 1-<5 121-240 >240 1-<5<1

1a MVS (2) fromRedox(3) 24 18 18 36 18 12

24w/AT

1b MVS fromHard Rock 18 18 18 18 12

1c MVS fromOther R/L (4) 12 12 12 12 6

Min trench depthfor above 12” below NGS Natural Ground Surface (3) May vary but either 6” above or below(not

exactly at) the fill/soil interface

2% Slope (%) 0-15 16-25 26-40 >40 (7)

3. Flooding Frequency Chance/Year None Rare

<5%Occasional

5-50%Frequent (7)

>50%

4. Landform(Slope Position)

Summit Shoulder Back & Other

Linear or Convex

Lower Back Foot & Other

Slightly Concave

ToeHead

Depression& Other Concave

Swamp, Wetlands, FloodplainDrain, Gully, Mine Spoil, Hydric

Soil Area (7)

Table 15

Page 44: PE etraining mtg

Conv Conv Conv Eng Eng Eng*

Perc Rate

5-60 61-90 91-120

120-240

>240 w/AT

1-<51-<5

MVS /2

24” 18” 18” 18” 12” 36”24”

Hard Rock

18” 18” 18” 18” 12” 24”

Soft Rock

12” 12” 12” 12” 6” 24”

Other 12” 12” 12” 12” 6” 24”

Slope 0-6 7-15 16-25 26-40 > 40