IMPROVE Carbon Analysis - Colorado State...
Transcript of IMPROVE Carbon Analysis - Colorado State...
IMPROVE Carbon Analysis
Judith C. Chow ([email protected]) Xiaoliang Wang Dana L. Trimble
L.-W. Antony Chen John G. Watson
Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV
Presented at
the IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting
Incline Village, NV
October 23, 2012
Objectives
• Report status and improvements of IMPROVE carbon analyses
• Update progress on next-generation carbon analyzer (DRI Model 20XX)
Carbon Laboratory Operations (July 2011 to June 2012)
• Received ~1,900 samples per month (between
800 – 3292)
• Maintained 24 hours per day/6-7 days per week operation with seven staff
• Analyzed ~21,000 IMPROVE samples per year (800 to 3,394 per month)
• Averaged ~3,000 samples per month in the queue (1,000 to 4,455)
• Participated in UC Davis Artifact Study (~560
samples for December 2011, January and August 2012)
IMPROVE Carbon Analysis following
the IMPROVE_Aa Protocol (July 2011 to June 2012)
Sampling Period Samples Received
Analysis Completion Date
7/1/11-12/31/11 12,794 April 2012
1/1/12-6/30/12 10,850 October 2012
a Chow et al. (2007) JAWMA
Regular oxygen performance tests show values within the
100 ppm tolerance (Tested every six months)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CA #6 CA #7 CA #8 CA #9 CA #10 CA #11 CA #12 CA #13 CA #16 CA #19
Tra
ce
Ox
yg
en
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n (
pp
m O
2)
Instrument ID
Aug 2011 Feb 2012 Aug 2012
OC1 at 140
C in 100% Helium atmosphere
Low OC and EC levels found on pre-fired
quartz-fiber filters (Acceptance testing, August 2011-July 2012)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Q539
8A
Q66
01B
Q66
10B
Q66
19B
Q66
28B
Q66
37B
Q66
46B
Q66
55B
Q66
64B
Q66
73B
Q66
82B
Q66
92A
Q67
01A
Q67
10A
Q67
19A
Q67
28B
Q67
37B
Q67
46B
Q67
56B
Q67
65B
Q67
74B
Q67
83B
Q679
2B
Q68
01B
Q68
10B
Q68
19B
Q68
29A
Q68
38A
Q68
47B
Q68
56B
Q68
66B
Q68
75B
Q68
84B
Q68
93B
Q69
02B
Q69
14A
Q69
24A
Q69
33B
Q69
42B
Q69
51B
Q69
60B
Q69
70B
Q69
79B
Q69
88B
Ca
rbo
n M
ea
su
rem
en
t (µ
g C
/cm
2)
Acceptance Quartz Filter ID
OCTRC ECTRC
Acceptable OC (1.5 µgC/cm²) Acceptable EC (0.5 µgC/cm²)
Average OC (0.24±0.22 µgC/cm²) Average EC (0.005±0.024 µgC/cm²
March 2012
Daily instrument auto-calibrationa is
within ±5% tolerance
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
7/1
/2011
8/6
/2011
9/1
2/2
011
10/1
8/2
011
11/2
4/2
011
12/3
0/2
011
2/5
/2012
3/1
2/2
012
4/1
8/2
012
5/2
4/2
012
6/3
0/2
012
Perc
en
tag
e D
iffe
ren
ce
of
Au
to-C
ali
bra
tio
n
Pea
k R
es
po
ns
e (
%)
Date of Auto-calibration Analysis
CA#6 CA#7 CA#8 CA#9 CA#10
CA#11 CA#12 CA#13 CA#16 CA#19
a With He, He/O2 and CH4
Quarterly standard calibration is within ±5%
tolerance (Sucrose; thrice per week)
16.0
16.5
17.0
17.5
18.0
18.5
19.0
19.5
20.07
/1/2
01
1
8/6
/20
11
9/1
2/2
01
1
10
/18
/20
11
11
/24
/20
11
12
/30
/20
11
2/5
/20
12
3/1
2/2
01
2
4/1
8/2
01
2
5/2
4/2
01
2
6/3
0/2
01
2
To
tal
Ca
rbo
n M
ea
su
rem
en
t (µ
g C
)
Date of Sucrose Analysis
CA#6 CA#7CA#8 CA#9CA#10 CA#11CA#12 CA#13CA#16 CA#19Upper Acceptable Limit (18.9 µg C) Lower Acceptable Limit (17.1 µg C)
Improvements in Carbon Analyzer (DRI Model 2001)
• Updated oven relay (with active air cooling) to reduce electrical resistance, ensure sufficient heat dissipation, and minimize outages
• Installed a new coupler (between light pipe to optical fiber) to ensure stability and reduce laser drift (<1.5%)
Worldwide Helium Shortage Mitigation Strategy
• Current helium (He) consumption is 2,500 L/day with an annual cost exceeding $10,000
• Plans to reduce He consumption by 50% (Add new
circuit board with valves)
– Stop He-3 venting through methanator during analysis (50
mL/min)
– Toggle make-up He valves (i.e., He-3, He-2, and CH4)
• Eventually replace He with another non-oxidizing gas (e.g., nitrogen or argon)
Helium Tanks
Gas Regulator
Implement EUSAAR-IIa Protocol in
DRI Model 2001 Temperature Residence Timeb
OC in 100% He IMPROVE_A EUSAAR-II EUSAAR-II
OC1 140 °C 200 °C 120 sec
OC2 280 °C 300 °C 150 sec
OC3 480 °C 450 °C 180 sec
OC4 580 °C 650 °C 180 sec
EC in 98% He/2% O2
EC0 -- 500 °C 120 sec
EC1 580 °C 550 °C 120 sec
EC2 740 °C 700 °C 70 sec
EC3 840 °C 850 °C 80 sec
a European Supersites for Atmospheric Aerosol Research protocol b IMPROVE_A residence times are predicated on peak and return-to-baseline
and range from 120 to 580 seconds.
Revised carbon analysis SOP to reflect
improvements (Number 2-216r3, October 22, 2012)
• Revised daily calibration schedule
• Updated QA/QC activities
• Enhanced troubleshooting guide
Chow et al., ABC, 2011
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Morning (Startup; 7 a.m.)
System blank, lab blank, Autocalib
Lab blank, sucrose
Lab blank, Autocalib, KHP
Lab blank, sucrose
Lab blank, Autocalib, KHP
Lab blank, sucrose
Lab blank, Autocalib
Evening (7 p.m.)
CO2 injection
Autocalib CO2 injection
Autocalib CO2 injection
Autocalib CO2 injection
Efforts in Carbon Research • Examined data trendsa between EC and filter
reflectance (EC–τR) to resolve questions about consistency after instrument upgrade (2005) with IMPROVE_A protocola
• Obtained NSF grant ($390,000 from Environmental Chemical
Science Program) to characterize source and chemical structures of brown carbon and compounds in thermal fractions (integrates Model 2001 with soft
photoionization TOF-MS)
• Conducted feasibility experiments for next generation DRI Model 20XX (Enhanced optical [λ=400–900 nm]
and elemental detection [C, H, N, S, O, and m/z spectra])
• Found changes in filter mass that may be related to organic vapor adsorption
aChen et al., 2012 AMT
Consistent Decreasing Trends in EC and
Reflectance (2000–2009)
Similar downward trends at 65 sites with average rates (relative
to the 2000–2004 baseline medians) of 4.5%/yr for EC and 4.1%/yr
for τR.
Chen et al., 2012 AMT
EC-τR Relationship shows minor changes for
most IMPROVE sites
EC+ (after 2005) vs. EC− (before
2005) relationships derived from robust regression analysis through τR
measurements show changes within
10% except for low-
loading samples (
20%).
Wemianche Wilderness
Brigantine National Wildlife Refuge
Hance Camp at Grand Canyon National Park
Corr
esp
on
din
g E
C+ b
y S
ite
(µ
g/c
m3)
10th to 90th Percentile EC- by Site (µg/cm2)
Washington, DC
Alaska
Integrated Model 2001 DRI carbon analyzer with
Photoionization Time-of-Flight/Mass Spectrometer (PI-TOF/MS; U. of Rostock, Germany)
Grabowski et al. (2012), ABC
y-scale x 0.25 !
y-scale x 0.25 !
y-scale x 1
OC I
OC II
OC III
IP
Sn
S0 REMPI Zimmermann, 2011
Mass spectra of
thermal carbon
fractions from Model
2001 with Resonance
Enhanced Multi-
Photon Ionization-
Time-of-Flight/Mass
Spectrometry (REMPI-
TOF/MS)
Potential configuration for next generation
thermal/optical carbon analyzer (DRI Model 20XX)
Flow Control
NetworkCHNS Reactor
(MnO2)
C→CO2, H→H2O,
N→NOx/N2, S→SO2
NDIR CO2
Detector
Carrier/Reaction
Gases
98
% H
e,2
% O
2
He
He
, C
H4
He
, O
2, N
O, S
O2
Calibration
Gases
Oven
Filter Loading
Push Rod
UV-VIS-NIR
Light Source
(λ=400-900 nm)
Optical
Spectrometer
(Reflectance)
Optical
Spectrometer
(Transmittance)
Optical
Fibers
Filter
Filter
Holder
Thermocouple
Heated Fused
Silica Capillary
Unoxidized species
Mass
Spectrometer
Vent
Four-Way
Solenoid Valve
Flow
Splitter
Outputs:
Reflectance/
Transmittance
Spectra
O
Mass Spectra
C, H, N, S
O Reactor
(C/Ni)
O→CO
Oxidation
Oven
(CuO)
CO→CO2
Oxidation
Oven
(CuO)
CO→CO2
Oxidation
Reactor
C→CO2
FIDMethanator
CO2→CH4
From
Oven
DRI Model 2001 Carbon Analyzer
C
DRI Model 2001
Carbon Analyzer
Outputs:
Use annular oven to measure key
elements and mass spectra Septum for
calibration gas
Outlet for un-oxidized fragments
Dual catalytic ovens
Reflectance Arm
Transmittance Arm
Sample Cross
• Allow the evolved gases to be analyzed with or without pre-catalytic conversion.
• Two ovens contain MnO2 or Ni/C catalyst for C, H, N, S, or O analysis
MnO2 Ni/C
MS signals are linear with C, H, N, and S quantities
in various calibration chemicals
y = 0.0694xR² = 0.998
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 50 100 150 200
MS
m/z
= 4
4 (
CO
2+)
Sig
na
l
Mass of C (µg)
Sulfanilamide
L-Cystine
CO2
CH4
C:
y = 0.2329xR² = 0.993
0
1
2
3
4
0 5 10 15 20
MS
m/z
= 1
8 (
H2O
+)
Sig
na
l
Mass of H (µg)
Sulfanilamide
L-Cystine
(NH4)2SO4
NH4NO3
CH4
H:
y = 0.0121xR² = 0.960
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 20 40 60 80
MS
m/z
= 3
0 (
NO
+)
Sig
nal
Mass of N (µg)
Sulfaniamide
L-Cystine
(NH4)2SO4
NH4NO3
N:
y = 0.0423xR² = 0.996
0
1
2
3
0 20 40 60 80
MS
m/z
= 6
4 (
SO
2+)
Sig
nal
Mass of S (µg)
Sulfanilamide
L-Cystine
(NH4)2SO4
S:
Sulfanilamide: C6H8N2O2S; L-Cystine: C6H12N2O4S2
Use reverse flow for O analysis to minimize
baseline drift (Reduce holding times by 45 minutes)
y = 0.75xR² = 0.92
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 20 40 60
Ex
pe
cte
d O
(µ
g)
NDIR Signal (mV)
Sucrose
KHP
Levoglucosan
O:
Non-dispersive infrared detector
Time (min)
20 40 60 80
Ion
Sig
nal
(a.u
.)
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
8.0e+4
1.0e+5
1.2e+5
8.0e+5
1.0e+6
1.2e+6
Oven
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
m/z=44 (CO2
+)
m/z=18 (H2O+) m/z=30 (NO
+)
m/z=64 (SO2
+)
CalibrationCH
4 Injection
Temperature
100% He 98% He / 2% O2
140°C
280°C
480°C
580°C
740°C
840°C
(a)
m/z=28 (CO+, N
2
+)
time vs Temp
Time vs m/z18
Time vs m/z28
Time vs m/z30
Time vs m/z64
Time (min)
20 40 60 80
ND
IR S
ign
al
(mV
)
40
60
80
100
400500
Oven
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
140°C
280°C480°C
580°C
CalibrationO
2 Injection
NDIR
Temperature
100% He(b)
y = 0.926x - 0.104
R² = 0.989
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Car
bo
n M
ass
by
Elem
en
tal A
nal
yzer
(µg)
Carbon Mass by Carbon Analyzer (µg)
EC1
OC3
OC2OC4
OC1
EC2EC3
1:1 Line
Quantify C, H, N, S, and O using the IMPROVE_A
protocol
Thermogram of Fresno ambient aerosol sample for (a) CHNS, and (b) O following the IMPROVE_A protocol.
Comparison of carbon fractions measured by elemental analyzer and DRI Model 2001
MS
Sig
nal (a
.u.)
Mass
spectrometry
produced
elemental
concentrations
comparable with
other detectors
IC-CD: Ion chromatography with conductivity detector FID: Flame ionization detector
Elemental composition varies between
summer and winter (Fresno, California)
Abundant (NH4)2SO4 in summer (Decompose at 200‒400
C; OC2 at 280
C in 100% Helium) (EC/TC=0.23)
Abundant NH4NO3 in winter (Dissociation starts at room temperature; OC1 at 140
C in 100% Helium) (EC/TC=0.28)
Source profiles vary between gasoline and
diesel samples for carbon fractions
Most carbon is in EC2; S is low due to low-S fuel. (EC/TC=0.62)
Increased C in OC and EC1 compared to diesel soot. (EC/TC=0.73)
Unoxidized mass spectra show different patterns
between gasoline and diesel exhaust samples
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
0.0
6.0e+4
1.2e+5
1.8e+5
2.4e+5
Ion m/z
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Ion
co
un
t (a
.u.)
0.0
6.0e+5
1.2e+6
1.8e+6
2.4e+6
Gasoline Engine Exhaust
OC1: 140 °C
OC2: 280 °C
OC3: 480 °C
OC4: 580 °C
207
219233
252
57
71 9781
111
149125
341281
0
1e+5
2e+5
3e+5
4e+5
0
2e+5
4e+5
6e+5
0
1e+5
2e+5
3e+5
4e+5
5e+5
Ion m/z
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Ion
co
un
t (a
.u.)
0
6e+5
1e+6
2e+6
2e+6
3e+6
Diesel Engine Exhaust
OC1: 140 °C
OC2: 280 °C
OC3: 480 °C
OC4: 580 °C
207 233 251
429
73
95 147281
355
341
325267
219
415399
327
221207
55
Experimental Configuration Using Xenon Lamp
and Spectrophotometers
Sample filter
Quartz light pipe
Xenon lamp Reflectance Spectrophotometer (200-1100 nm)
Transmittance Spectrophotometer (200-1100 nm)
Oven
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
350 400 450 500 550 600 650Re
fle
cta
nc
e A
tte
nu
ati
on
(-)
Wavelength (nm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
No
rma
lize
d L
as
er
Refl
ec
nta
nce
,Tra
ns
mit
tan
ce,
FID
Sig
na
l
Sa
mp
le O
ve
n T
em
pe
ratu
re ( C
)
Anaylsis Time (sec)
TempR (633 nm)T (633 nm)FID
Spectral reflectance distinguishes native and charred light-
absorbing carbon in wood smoke
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Re
fle
cta
nc
e A
tte
nu
ati
on
(-)
Wavelength (nm)
Spectral reflectance reveals brown carbon absorption for humic acid
33 DRI publications using IMPROVE protocol since 2011 meeting
• Bell, S.W.; Hansell, R.A.; Chow, J.C.; Tsay, S.C.; Wang, S.H.; Ji, Q.; Li, C.; Watson, J.G.; Khlystov, A. (2012). Constraining aerosol optical models using ground-based, collocated particle size and mass measurements in variable air mass regimes during the 7-SEAS/Dongsha experiment. Atmos. Environ., online.
• Cao, J.J.; Li, H.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Lee, S.C.; Rong, B.; Dong, J.G.; Ho, K.F. (2011). Chemical composition of indoor and outdoor atmospheric particles at Emperor Qin's terra-cotta museum, Xi'an, China. AAQR, 11(1):70-79. http://aaqr.org/VOL11_No1_February2011/8_AAQR-10-10-OA-0088_70-79.pdf.
• Cao, J.J.; Chow, J.C.; Tao, J.; Lee, S.C.; Watson, J.G.; Ho, K.F.; Wang, G.H.; Zhu, C.S.; Han, Y.M. (2011). Stable carbon isotopes in aerosols from Chinese cities: Influence of fossil fuels. Atmos. Environ., 45(6):1359-1363.
• Cao, J.J.; Shen, Z.X.; Chow, J.C.; Lee, S.C.; Watson, J.G.; Tie, X.X.; Ho, K.F.; Wang, G.H.; Han, Y.M. (2012). Winter and summer PM2.5 chemical compositions in 14 Chinese cities. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 62(10):1214-1226. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.701193. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10962247.2012.7011933 .
33 DRI publications using IMPROVE protocol since 2011 meeting
(continued)
• Cao, J.J.; Wang, Q.Y.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Tie, X.X.; Shen, Z.X.; An, Z.S. (2012). Impacts of aerosol compositions on visibility impairment in Xi'an, China. Atmos. Environ., 59:559-566.
• Cao, J.J.; Huang, H.; Lee, S.C.; Chow, J.C.; Zou, C.W.; Ho, K.F.; Watson, J.G. (2012). Indoor/outdoor relationships for organic and elemental carbon in PM2.5 at residential homes in Guangzhou, China. AAQR, 12(5):902-910. http://aaqr.org/VOL12_No5_October2012/18_AAQR-12-02-OA-0026_902-910.pdf.
• Chen, L.-W.A.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; DuBois, D.W.; Herschberger, L. (2011). PM2.5 source apportionment: Reconciling receptor models for U.S. non-urban and urban long-term networks. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 61(11):1204-1217.
• Chen, L.-W.A.; Robles, J.A.; Wang, X.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G. (2011). Thermal pretreatment for online measurement of black carbon. Presented at 10th International Conference on Carbonaceous Particles in the Atmosphere (ICCPA), Vienna, Austria, 6/26-29/2011.
• Chen, L.-W.A.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Schichtel, B.A. (2012). Consistency of long-term elemental carbon trends from thermal and optical measurements in the IMPROVE network. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussion, 5:2329-2338. http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/5/2329/2012/amt-5-2329-2012.pdf.
• Chen, L.-W.A.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Green, M.C.; Inouye, D.; Dick, K. (2012). Wintertime particulate pollution episodes in an urban valley of the western U.S.: A case study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12(1):36. http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/15801/2012/acpd-12-15801-2012.pdf.
• Chen, L.-W.A.; Tropp, R.J.; Li, W.-W.; Zhu, D.Z.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Zielinska, B. (2012). Aerosol and air toxics exposure in El Paso, Texas: A pilot study. AAQR, 12(2):169-189. http://aaqr.org/VOL12_No2_April2012/3_AAQR-11-10-OA-0169_169-179.pdf.
• Cheng, Y.; Zou, S.C.; Lee, S.C.; Chow, J.C.; Ho, K.F.; Watson, J.G.; Han, Y.M.; Zhang, R.J.; Zhang F.; Yau, P.S.; Huang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wu, W.J. (2011). Characteristics and source apportionment of PM1 emissions at a roadside station. J. Hazard. Mat., 195:82-91.
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Robles, J.; Wang, X.L.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Trimble, D.L.; Kohl, S.D.; Tropp, R.J.; Fung, K.K. (2011). Quality assurance and quality control for thermal/optical analysis of aerosol samples for organic and elemental carbon. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401(10):3141-3152. DOI 10.1007/s00216-011-5103-3.
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Motallebi, N. (2011). PM2.5 source profiles for black and organic carbon emission inventories. Atmos. Environ., 45(31):5407-5414.
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G. (2012). Chemical analyses of particle filter deposits. In Aerosols Handbook : Measurement, Dosimetry, and Health Effects, 2; Ruzer, L., Harley, N. H., Eds.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, 179-204.
• Cortez-Lugo, M.; Escamilla-Nunez, C.; Barraza-Villarreal, A.; Texcalc-Sangrador, J.L.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Hernandez-Cadena, L.; Romieu, I. (2012). Association between light absorption measurements of PM2.5 and distance from heavy traffic roads in the Mexico City metropolitan area. Salud publica de Mexico, submitted
• Grabowsky, J.; Streibel, T.; Sklorz, M.; Chow, J.C.; Mamakos, A.; Zimmermann, R. (2011). Hyphenation of a carbon analyzer to photo-1 ionization mass spectrometry to unravel the organic composition of particulate matter on a molecular level. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401(10):3153-3164.
• Green, M.C.; Chow, J.C.; Chang, M.C.O.; Chen, L.W.A.; Kuhns, H.D.; Etyemezian, V.R. (2012). Source apportionment of atmospheric particulate carbon in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Particuology, in press.
• Gyawali, M.; Arnott, W.P.; Zaveri, R.A.; Song, C.; Moosmüller, H.; Liu, L.; Mischchenko, M.L.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Green, M.C.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C. (2012). Photoacoustic optical properties at UV, VIS, and near IR wavelengths for laboratory generated and winter time ambient urban aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12:2587-2601. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2587/2012/acp-12-2587-2012.pdf.
• Han, Y.M.; Cao, J.J.; Yan, B.Z.; Kenna, T.C.; Jin, Z.D.; Cheng, Y.; Chow, J.C.; An, Z.S. (2011). Comparison of elemental carbon in lake sediments measured by three different methods and 150-year pollution history in eastern China. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(12):5287-5293.
33 DRI publications using IMPROVE protocol since 2011 meeting
(continued)
• Ho, S.S.H.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Ng, L.P.T.; Kwok, Y.; Ho, K.F.; Cao, J.J. (2011). Precautions for in-injection port thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD-GC/MS) applied to aerosol filter samples. Atmos. Environ., 45(7):1491-1496.
• Hu, T.F.; Cao, J.J.; Ho, K.F.; An, Z.S.; Lee, S.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Li, H. (2011). Winter and summer characteristics of airborne particles Inside Emperor Qin's Terra-Cotta Museum, China: A study by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 61(9):914-922.
• McDonald, J.D.; White, R.K.; Holmes, T.; Mauderly, J.L.; Zielinska, B.; Chow, J.C. (2012). Simulated downwind coal combustion emissions for laboratory inhalation exposure atmospheres. Inhal. Toxicol., 24(5):310-319.
• Pope, C.A., III; Ayala, A.; Bailar, J.C.; Bell, M.; Boyle, K.J.; Brandt, S.; Bui, L.; Corbett, J.J.; Fernandez, I.J.; Frey, H.C.; Fuglestvedt, J.; Gerking, S.; Helble, J.J.; Jacobson, M.Z.; Levy, J.; Menon, S.; Poirot, R.L.; Russell, A.G.; Walsh, M.; Watson, J.G. (2011). Review of the draft report to Congress on black carbon. prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,DC, http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/fedrgstr_activites/38059D3EA6FE3A19852578EA004A7469/$File/EPA-COUNCIL-11-002-unsigned.pdf.
• Sahu, M.; Hu, S.; Ryan, P.H.; LeMasters, G.; Grinshpun, S.A.; Chow, J.C.; Biswas, P. (2011). Chemical compositions and source identification of PM2.5 aerosols for estimation of a diesel source surrogate. Sci. Total Environ., 409(13):2642-2651. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711002853.
• Soto-Garcia, L.L.; Andreae, M.O.; Andreae, T.W.; Artaxo, P.; Maenhaut, W.; Kirchstetter, T.; Novakov, T.; Chow, J.C.; Mayol-Bracero, O.L. (2011). Evaluation of the carbon content of aerosols from the burning of biomass in the Brazilian Amazon using thermal, optical and thermal-optical analysis methods. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11(9):4425-4444.
33 DRI publications using IMPROVE protocol since 2011 meeting
(continued)
• Wang, X.L.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Kohl, S.D.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Sodeman, D.A.; Legge, A.H.; Percy, K.E. (2012). Measurement of real-world stack emissions with a dilution sampling system. In Alberta Oil Sands: Energy, Industry, and the Environment, Percy, K. E., Ed.; Elsevier Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in press.
• Wang, X.L.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Gronstal, S.; Kohl, S.D. (2012). An efficient multipollutant system for measuring real-world emissions from stationary and mobile sources. AAQR, 12(1):145-160. http://aaqr.org/VOL12_No2_April2012/1_AAQR-11-11-OA-0187_145-160.pdf.
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C. (2011). Ambient aerosol sampling. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques and Applications, Third Edition, 3; Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., Willeke, K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 591-614.
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Wang, X.L.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Kohl, S.D.; Gronstal, S. (2011). Real-world emissions from non-road mining trucks. Report Number 010109-123109; prepared by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, for Ft. McMurray, AB, Canada, Wood Buffalo Environmental Association.
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Wang, X.L.; Kohl, S.D.; Gronstal, S. (2011). Winter stack emissions measured with a dilution sampling system. prepared by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, for Ft. McMurray, AB, Canada, Wood Buffalo Environmental Association.
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.L. (2012). Reformulation of PM2.5 mass reconstruction assumptions for the San Joaquin Valley. prepared by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, for San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Fresno, CA.
• Zhou, J.M.; Cao, J.J.; Zhang, R.J.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G. (2012). Carbonaceous and ionic components of atmospheric fine particles in Beijing and their impact on atmospheric visibility. AAQR, 12(4):492-502. http://aaqr.org/VOL12_No4_August2012/4_AAQR-11-11-OA-0218_492-502.pdf.
33 DRI publications using IMPROVE protocol since 2011 meeting
(continued)
Canada and China have adopted
IMPROVE_A for their long-term networks
Future Activities
• Retrofit new valves and circuit boards to reduce helium consumption on carbon analyzers.
• Evaluate comparability and differences between IMPROVE_A and EUSAAR-II protocols.
• Participate in European efforts for round-robin carbon intercomparison and standard reference material (SRM) development.
• Develop algorithm to convert reflectance/transmission signal to absorption and compare Angstrom Absorption Exponent to quantify OC, brown carbon, and EC.
• Integrate C, H, N, S, with O analysis.