Paul Fallon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratorybrown/EFES-2010/pdf/fallon.pdf · Paul Fallon...
-
Upload
truongtuyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Paul Fallon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratorybrown/EFES-2010/pdf/fallon.pdf · Paul Fallon...
Paul Fallon
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Measurements of B(E2) transition rates in neutron rich carbon isotopes, 16C-20C.
EFES-NSCL Workshop on
Perspectives on the modern shell model and related experimental topics.
MSU Feb 4-6, 2010
Marina Petri, R. M. Clark, M. Cromaz, S. Gros, H. B. Jeppesen,
I-Y. Lee, A. O. Macchiavelli, S. Paschalis
LBNL
K. Starosta, T. Baugher, D. Bazin, H. Crawford, A. Gade, Grinyer, S. McDaniel,
D. Miller, A. Ratkiewicz, P. Voss, K. Walsh, D. Weisshaar
NSCL/MSU
M. Wiedeking
LLNL
A. Dewald, M. Hackstein, W. Rother
Cologne
Energy Levels in a Woods Saxon Potential
A second distinct effect is due to
weakly bound levels
• low l levels (s, p) extended
wavefunctions (“halos”)
• Spatially extended valence particles
can have less influence on the core
(“decoupled”)
• Coupling to continuum statesA.Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, vol. 1
In a well bound nucleus
• steady evolution of energy levels in a
1 body potential
• modified by 2-body NN interaction
(s.t, Tensor)
PHYSICAL REVIEW C 76, 054319 (2007)
Nilsson diagrams for light neutron-rich nuclei with weakly-bound neutrons
Ikuko Hamamoto
PHYSICAL REVIEW C 76, 054319 (2007)
Nilsson diagrams for light neutron-rich nuclei with weakly-bound neutrons
Ikuko Hamamoto
Carbon Nuclei
• N=8 closed p-shell (14C)
• N=16 dripline 22C (cf 24O)
• Occupation of n(s1/2) (A≥15)
• Weak binding (15,17,19C)
N > 8
g.s. large ns1/2 component
2+ dominant neutron excitation
B(E2) wavefunction; charge distribution; en(eff)
F.Rintaro. PhD Thesis (U.Tokyo 2002)Data from A. Ozawa, et al., NPA691, 599 (2001).
8 neutrons
Interaction cross sections for
carbon isotopes.
Oxygen Carbon
M.Staniou et al., PHYSICAL REVIEW C 78, 034315 (2008)
Disappearance of the N = 14 shell gap in the carbon isotopic chain
TBME Vpn
pp1/2 - nd5/2 attracts
pp1/2 - ns1/2 repels
Constant 2+
16C and 18O 2+ state - dominant neutron excitation
18O: B(E2) = 9.5(3) e2fm4
= 3.2 W.u.
16C: B(E2) = 4.15(73) e2fm4
= 1.73 W.u.
Core polarization ~ Z
B(E2)18O *(6/8)2 = 1.8 W.u
~ B(E2) 16C
N=10: 2n valence nuclei 16C and 18O
( ( 22
12 pds pn
Interaction matrix element V
in β between proton holes
and neutrons is ~ 1 MeV.
→ Consistent with p-1 and
(sd)4 value in 19F
Arima and Hamamoto, Ann.
Rev. Nucl. Sci. 21 (1971).
222 22)2( pEpUSDEUSDEB
3 e2fm4 from USD model 3.7 e2fm4 from 14C4.15 e2fm4 from 16C
( ( 2216
1 24.097.0;2 pdsC pn
94% 6%
15C d5/2s1/2 transition; derive en ~ 0.4
(assume “neutrons” only)
en ~ 0.4 16C B(E2;USD) ~ 3 e2fm4
proton admixture
The 16C B(E2) – “components”
Vint
2+
2+
( 2dsn
( 2pp
0+
B(E2) = 1/(2Ji+1) * | Mn*en + Mp*ep |2
B(E2)
…. from M.Wiedeking et al., PRL 100, 152501 (2008)
Effective Charges
• 16,18C B(E2) strong dependence on en(eff)
neutron excitation
• 14C B(E2) weak dependence on en(eff)
proton excitation
B(E2) “constrains” e(eff)n,p
S. Fujii et al. Phys. Lett. B 650 (2007) 9–14
14C expt 3.74(50)
B(E2) = 1/(2Ji+1) * | Mn*en + Mp*ep |2
• Effective charge – a measure of
coupling between valence particles
and core (binding)
• Model-space dependent
Isospin Dependence of Effective Charges(Bohr Mottelson Vol 2)
Carbon Isotopes (A)
en
Epol ~ Z/A
Sagawa et al PRC 70 (2004) 054316
B(E
2)
[e2fm
4]
12C 14C 16C 18C 20C
Ong
Wiedeking
Ong
Shell Model
H. Sagawa
Carbon Isotopes B(E2) Systematics
B(E2) = 1/(2Ji+1) * | Mn*en + Mp*ep |2
Elekes
Inelastic scattering on C, Pb
Lifetime measurement
B(E2) = 1/(2Ji+1) * | Mn*en + Mp*ep |2
Z. Elekes et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C 79, 011302(R) (2009)
Carbon Isotopes (A)
en
A campaign of experiments (Feb 2009) to measure the lifetime of the
2+ state in 16,18,20C was carried out at the NSCL
Lifetimes were measured using the Recoil Distance Method with fast
RI beams (v ~0.4c)
2+ states were populated using the knockout reactions
a)b)c)
C C C C C C
Carbon B(E2: 2+→ 0+) Systematics
(1)
(2)
(1) This work – M.Petri (LBNL)
(2) This Work – P.Voss (MSU)
t = 10(3) ps (preliminary)
B(E2) ~ 7.2 +3.1/-1.7 e2fm4
Lifetime (ps)
2 for 30 and 140 degree detectors
30 degree detectors
140 degree detectors
20C 2+ State Mean Lifetime
data6ps
15ps10ps
a)b)c)
Carbon B(E2: 2+→ 0+) Systematics
x
xx
Shell Model: B.A.Brown
WBP interaction
“A-dependent” e(p,n)(1)
(2)
(1) This work – M.Petri (LBNL)
(2) This Work – P.Voss (MSU)
(3) This work – M.Petri (LBNL)
(3)
B(E2) = 1/(2Ji+1) * | Mn*en + Mp*ep |2
Z. Elekes et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C 79, 011302(R) (2009)
This work
e(p)
15C (expt)
16C
18C
20C
B(E2) = |Mpep + Mnen|2 /(2Ji+1)
e(n) smooth dependence on A
16C (expt)
20C(Elekes)
18C (expt)
20C “expected”
p-sd shell model H.O wavefunctions WBP interaction (Alex Brown)
Sagawa PRC 70, 054316 (2004)
20C (LBL/MSU)
B(E
2)
[e2fm
4]
12C 14C 16C 18C 20C
Shell Model
H. Sagawa
Carbon Isotopes B(E2) Systematics
“↑ proton” “neutron” “↑ proton”
2+ state component
Proton ESPE (Z=6)
F.Rintaro. PhD Thesis (U.Tokyo 2002)
• Reduced p3/2-p1/2 gap
1-Proton Knockout Spectroscopic FactorsA+1N AC
Calculated
s (0+/2+
13% 21% 57%
Measured
s (0+/2+
10% 20%
( ( 22
12 pds pn
In 1-p knockout population of 2+
proceeds through the proton component
SF (2+/0+ = s (2+/0+ ~ 2* 5/2
Calculated amplitudes and occupations
(16C) ~ 0.2 ~5% proton occ.
( 18C ) ~ 0.3 ~8% proton occ.
( 20C ) ~ 0.5 ~23% proton occ.
20C 2+ is a mixed state
Neutron Contribution
Shell Model (A. Brown)M_p M_n
16C 1.54 9.2218C 1.9 11.1120C 3.33 11.65
( ( 22
12 pds pn
Seniority Scheme B(E2, n) = [n (2j+1-n)/(2(2j-1)]* B(E2, n=2)
Neutron shell closed at 14C (N=8) and 22C (N=16) 2j+1=8 (ns1/2+nd5/2)
16C M(E2, n=2) ~ 20C M(E2, n=6)
22C M(E2, n=8) ~ 0 (if N=16 closed) 0 (if N=16 broken)
20C M_n remains high
Oxygen Carbon
• Experiments with Fast beams
- most neutron-rich
• RDDS (DSAM lineshape?) lifetimes
• good energy resolution
• efficiency
GRETINA has efficiency and resolution
to extend experimental reach
Future … GRETINA
• GRETINA
• An array of highly segmented
Germanium Detectors
• Measure location and energy of
g-ray interactions
• Gamma-ray tracking
• 1p coverage
• Experiments in 2011
• Influence of weak binding
–Coupling to continuum, extended wavefunctions, …
• Transition rates can, in some circumstances, provide a way to isolate new effects of weak binding
• Extracted transition rates from 16C 20C (near dripline)
– Quantitative test of model(s) - require a consistent description from stable ”dripline” nuclei
• No evidence (here) for dramatic changes
– shell model appears to be able to track 2+ energies and B(E2)
– Mixed 2+ implies n-p coupling
Proton contributions important - measure proton spectroscopic factor: p1/2,3/2 (need to know this to understand (de)coupling)
Summary