Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

download Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

of 23

Transcript of Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    1/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    2/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    3/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    4/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    5/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    6/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    7/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    8/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    9/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    10/23

    BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNALSOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

    Application No. 23 of 2014 (SZ)and

    M.A. No. 21 of 2014 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)K. Mari, Ramnagar Vs. The Chairman, Tamil NaduCoimbatore Pollution Control Board and others

    Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s)

    M/s. M. Samuel Raja and S. Kalai Selvi

    Legal practitioners for respondent(s)

    Smt. H. Yasmeen Ali for R-1 and R-2

    Ms. J.Hemamalini for R-3.

    Note of the Registry Orders of the Tribunal

    Order No. Date: 9thJuly, 2014

    When the matter is taken up today, the counsel

    for the applicant is present. The counsel for the

    respondents 1 and 2 have filed their reply.

    Ms.J.Hemamalini, the counsel undertakes to file

    vakalat for the 3rdrespondent. Despite the service

    of notice, the 4threspondent has not appeared. The

    Non-bailable warrant is issued for the production of

    the 4th respondent in the next hearing. It is

    submitted by the counsel for the applicant that

    though a show cause notice was served on the 4th

    respondent Unit for closure which was also followed

    by an order of closure, the 4 th respondent illegally

    continues the operation of the Unit. The statement

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    11/23

    of the counsel for the applicant is recorded. The 2nd

    respondent is directed to make an inspection and

    file a status report in the next hearing.

    The matter is posted to 13.8.2014.

    Prof. Dr. R. Nagendran Justice M. Chockalingam

    (Expert Member) (Judicial Member)

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    12/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    13/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    14/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    15/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    16/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    17/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    18/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    19/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    20/23

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    21/23

    BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNALSOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

    Application No. 23 of 2014 (SZ)and

    M.A. No. 21 of 2014 (SZ)

    Applicant(s) Respondent(s)K. Mari, Ramnagar Vs. The Chairman, Tamil NaduCoimbatore Pollution Control Board and others

    Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s)

    M/s. M. Samuel Raja and S. Kalai Selvi

    Legal practitioners for respondent(s)

    Smt. H. Yasmeen Ali for R-1 and R-2

    Ms. J.Hemamalini for R-3.

    Note of the Registry Orders of the Tribunal

    Order No. Date: 9thJuly, 2014

    When the matter is taken up today, the counsel

    for the applicant is present. The counsel for the

    respondents 1 and 2 have filed their reply.

    Ms.J.Hemamalini, the counsel undertakes to file

    vakalat for the 3rdrespondent. Despite the service

    of notice, the 4threspondent has not appeared. The

    Non-bailable warrant is issued for the production of

    the 4th respondent in the next hearing. It is

    submitted by the counsel for the applicant that

    though a show cause notice was served on the 4th

    respondent Unit for closure which was also followed

    by an order of closure, the 4 th respondent illegally

    continues the operation of the Unit. The statement

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    22/23

    of the counsel for the applicant is recorded. The 2nd

    respondent is directed to make an inspection and

    file a status report in the next hearing.

    The matter is posted to 13.8.2014.

    Prof. Dr. R. Nagendran Justice M. Chockalingam

    (Expert Member) (Judicial Member)

  • 8/10/2019 Patelroad Scribd Upload 2

    23/23