Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

36
Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Transcript of Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 1: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 2: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Prepared for Oxfam Australia by the Climate Change Adaptation Program (CCAP), RMIT University, Melbourne

Supported by Australian aid.

Dr Iftekhar Ahmed, Research Fellow, CCAPDr Hartmut Fuenfgeld, Research Fellow, CCAPProf Darryn McEvoy, Principal Researcher, CCAPProduced by Annette Salkeld, Oxfam Australia

Published November 2012

132 Leicester Street Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: +61 3 9289 9444 Fax: +61 3 9347 1983 www.oxfam.org.au

Design: Jeffrey Paul

Print Production: Jocelyn Tan

Printed with vegetable based inks on Cyclus print matt, an unbleached coated paper made from 100% recycled post-consumer waste.

Cover photo: Ngaunta Ienraoi stands where her grandmother’s house once was. “More than 10 people lost their houses [during a king tide]. The land in front of them was washed away. I remember seeing all the houses … floating in the water. They lost everything,” says Ngaunta. Her grandmother and neighbours have since moved further inland, an increasingly common occurrence in low-lying Kiribati. Photo: Rodney Dekker/OxfamAUS

Page 3: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Key Climate Change and Disasters Concepts 2

3. Key PCVA Concepts 3

4. Getting Started 5

5. Working with Communities 7

6 Other Points to Consider 9

7. Guidance on PCVA Stages 11

8. Annexes 25

9. Key Resources and References 31

Page 4: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 1

1. Introduction

This toolkit assembles a set of tools and describes the process for conducting a Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) of disaster and climate change risks at the community level. This PCVA toolkit is targeted primarily for community-based staff members of development agencies such as Oxfam and national agencies. It follows an integrated approach to assessing disaster and climate change risk, and using this information to support communities to develop community action plans for disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA).

While the process of conducting PCVA can be elaborate, for simplicity this toolkit highlights the key components and processes of a PCVA — it does not provide a detailed description for using each tool. Links to further resources are provided where relevant, and annexes at the end summarises the different tools used in the PCVA.

There are many other PCVA or related manuals; some of them are listed in the Key Resources section at the end of this document. Some of these manuals have been adapted to the local context or are available in local languages, or may target a specific sector, such as agriculture. The PCVA facilitation team should read these additional documents as necessary, particularly those written in the local language, where further guidance is needed. The PVCA process is a flexible one; different tools can be used where they are considered more appropriate.

It should be highlighted that the PCVA process is not a toolkit for extracting information from communities. It is a process where communities willingly participate in analysing their capacity and vulnerability regarding climate change and disasters. It is a stepping stone to the community’s own action plans for strengthening its capacity and reducing vulnerability. The role of the organisation conducting the PCVA with the community is to facilitate the process and assist the community to undertake their own analysis.

This toolkit begins with a brief background on disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and explains some key concepts. The main aspects of PCVA and the approach followed in this toolkit are also presented briefly, followed by some guidance notes.

There are nine stages in this PVCA; each of them is discussed here with regards to the purpose, the tasks to be conducted and the tools to be used. The first two stages are pre-facilitation stages, which allow the PCVA facilitators to prepare for the PVCA and become familiar with relevant resources. The next seven stages are about facilitating the PCVA and build upon one another to undertake the whole PCVA process. The PCVA stages are shown in Fig. 1.

Stage 1

Preparing for PCVA

Re-Facilitation stages

Stage 2

Collecting secondary data

Stage 3

Generating a community view

Facilitation Stages

Stage 4

Understanding vulnerability to hazards and stresses

Stage 5

Livelihood analysis

Stage 6

Analysing future uncertainty

Stage 7

Governance Analysis

Stage 8

Prioritising and action plan

Stage 9

Finalising the PCVA

Fig. 1: Stages of conducting a PCVA

Page 5: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 2

2. Key Climate Change and Disasters Concepts

Climate or disaster risk is the probability or likelihood that a hazard or long term change will cause injury, damage or loss. It is related to the magnitude of the hazard, and to capacity and vulnerability of the community. If the capacity in a community is high, risk is low, but if vulnerability is high, risk will also be high. Therefore risk reduction involves both increasing capacity and reducing vulnerability.

Climate change: a change in climate patterns that persists for decades or longer. It arises from human activity that alters the composition of the atmosphere(ie greenhouse gas emissions) that is over and above natural climate variability.

Climate change adaptation (CCA): actions that people and institutions make in anticipation of, or in response to, a changing climate. This includes altering things they do and/or the way they do them.

Climate change mitigation (CCM): An activity to reduce the drivers of climate change, by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In the context of disasters, “mitigation” means the measures taken before the impact of a disaster to minimise its effects.

Resilience: The ability of a system or community to resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient way.

Disaster: A serious disruption of the functioning of a community causing widespread human, material or environmental losses and impacts, which exceeds the ability of the affected community to cope using its own resources.

Disaster risk reduction (DRR): The systematic effort to analyze and manage the causal factors of disasters, i.e. reduce exposure to hazards, lessen vulnerability of people and property, wise environmental management, and improved preparedness for adverse events.

Hazard: Event that has the potential for causing injuries to life and damaging property and the environment.

Capacity: Positive conditions or abilities which increase a community’s ability to deal with hazards.

Vulnerability: Conditions that reduce people’s ability to prepare for, withstand or respond to a hazard.

Disasters can result from natural and human induced hazards. There are three main types of natural hazards – geological (earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides etc), hydro-meteorological (floods, cyclones, drought, etc) and human induced (conflict, chemical spills, industrial accidents etc). A disaster occurs when the impacts of a hazard exceeds a community’s ability to cope using its own resources.

Climate change is impacting on hydro-meteorological (or weather-related) hazards by altering their frequency or intensity, and is expected to become more extreme in the future. Climate change will also have long term impacts such as gradually increasing temperatures, changing seasons, unpredictable rain and rising sea levels.

This PVCA can analyse all types of hazards, how climate change may alter their nature and the long term impacts of climate change.

Understanding the following terms is essential for conducting an integrated climate change and disaster PCVA.

Page 6: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 3

3. Key PCVA Concepts

The PCVA toolkit is one of a range of program tools designed at different organisational levels for addressing climate change and disaster risk. For example, decision-making tools support program managers when developing new programs and screening tools allow a higher level assessment of climate or disaster risk in current projects or program portfolios. The PCVA toolkit is designed to be used by field staff and at the community level to help design both new and existing programs.

There are three main objectives:

1. To analyse vulnerability to climate change and disasters at the community level, and the potential capacity within the community for dealing with climate change and disasters.

2. To combine community knowledge and scientific data to gain understanding about local risks.

3. To directly inform local level action plans to reduce the risks from disasters and climate change impacts.

In order to reduce climate and disaster risks, communities need to increase their capacity and reduce their vulnerability. PCVA is a systematic way of understanding and analysing the capacity and vulnerability of communities, and distinct groups within a community, to climate change and disaster risks, and is an important step in planning for and implementing CCA and DRR initiatives.

While many development programs focus on vulnerability, as it is often more evident, there are often hidden capacities – social networks, local knowledge, community resilience, etc – which are not easily revealed. The capacity of marginal groups – women, children, elderly, etc – is often overlooked, although that may have potential for CCA and DRR. Therefore the PCVA approach in this toolkit highlights analysis of capacity as an important way of offsetting vulnerability.

PCVA places importance on local knowledge and draws on information and knowledge of communities, and their analysis of the information. However, as important can be the introduction and analysis of outside information – such as climate information, weather forecasting and disaster records, to support a greater understanding of local risk. It is a participatory process — local communities are at the heart of conducting the PCVA. The main features of a PCVA are shown in Table 1.

PCVA can allow collecting and analysing information to develop specific CCA/DRR initiatives, preferably in an integrated way. It also allows the integration of CCA and DRR into other sector programs such as natural resource, water management/water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and sustainable livelihoods. The results of a PCVA can also provide practical evidence for advocacy on climate change and disasters issues.

The PCVA toolkit is primarily used at the beginning of a program to inform program plans and activities. However it can also be undertaken after a program has begun where climate change and disaster risks have not been considered. In this situation a PVCA can help to adjust program activities to better address these risks.

The data and analysis documents and materials (maps, diagrams, charts, etc) can also be used as a baseline to evaluate the project’s outcomes and to understand if and how capacities have been strengthened and vulnerabilities reduced. This can be done during midterm or final evaluations of the program. Therefore it is essential that all such documents and resources are stored and maintained until project completion, and to be accessible even afterwards as reference material for other projects.

Page 7: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 4

Table 1: Key features of PCVA

Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA)

Brief description PCVA is a risk analysis process that is designed to engage with communities in contexts where disasters and climate change are significant drivers of poverty and suffering.

Objectives A PCVA process may be undertaken to achieve a range of objectives, including the following:

• To integrate disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) into an existing program

• To inform the design of a new program that will integrate DRR and CCA measures

• To monitor/evaluate the impact of actions taken to reduce risk and enable CCA, and assist in the identification of new ones

• To guide advocacy strategies for DRR and adaptation.

Scale Community

Framework 1. Collecting secondary data

2. Generating contextual information

3. Conducting analysis

4. Risk prioritisation

5. Formulating action

6. Moving towards implementation

Methods Community and stakeholder consultations, participatory methods, background research

Page 8: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

4. Getting Started

This section outlines some of the logistic and management considerations to address when you are planning a PVCA process.

Establishing the Facilitation Team• Decide the specific role(s) of each facilitation team

member. Ensure a balanced representation of women and men in the team.

• The facilitation team leader should have significant experience in using participatory tools, strong facilitation skills and a good knowledge of climate change science and impacts.

• Members of the facilitation team should have experience in participatory methods and the PCVA preparatory training in Stage 1 should strengthen their skills. Additionally understanding and knowledge of the local context, as well as a knack for working with communities, are key qualities that the facilitation team members should have.

• Facilitating a PCVA also requires sensitivity and understanding of the potential and challenges of the local context. Team members should have these attributes.

• If necessary, less experienced team members should be accompanied by somebody who is experienced and can provide in-situ training during the process of conducting the PCVA.

• If it is a large team, decide if it can be divided into smaller groups (2–3 team members in each group) to conduct the same exercises to achieve triangulation.

• Ideally women team members will conduct the PCVA process with women community members, or at least include some women team members. It might be necessary to include team members with local language skills or interpreters to ensure adequate participation across the community.

• In some communities, elderly or powerful male community members might feel disturbed by the presence of women team members. Be aware of such local sensitivities and respect them to the extent that they do not affect the outcomes of the PCVA.

• Develop a system for collating, organising and storing documents and other materials. Identify the team member who will be responsible for this.

Time• Decide how much time will be allocated for the

PCVA process and, if it is part of a larger project, how the PCVA timeline will fit into the overall project time-frame.

• Make a rough estimate of how much time each stage might require. Time requirements will depend on a number of issues such as if previous assessments have been undertaken, the size/scope of the program, and the time availability of the community. As a guide, the community component should be no less than 5 days.

• The PVCA process can be undertaken with communities in one block of time, or spread out over a number of visits, depending on local circumstances.

• For all the PCVA stages, develop a draft schedule and finalise through discussion with the community to ensure suitability and availability of community members. Consider if people will have to take time off from work or other commitments to take part and whether it can be scheduled for when they have free time. This may be different for different groups in the community.

• It is very important to be flexible. It may not always be possible to stick to the schedule, so build in generous allowances. PCVA is an elaborate process, so anticipate significant time involvement.

• Also anticipate surprises and unpredictable changes, and be prepared to make last moment changes and revise plans.

Budget• Decide the budget. Do not spend unnecessarily,

but also do not be thrifty at the expense of safety, comfort and well-being of the facilitation team and community participants. Utilise funds in a balanced way, in tune with the local context and living standards.

• Allow a budget for: (a) Transport; estimate how much travel is involved and then budget for it; (b) Equipment (photographic, laptops, recorders, batteries, first-aid kit, or any other as required) and stationery (flipcharts, markers, index cards, notebooks, etc); make a list of what will be required and prepare a budget; (c) Daily expenses of facilitation team members; estimate what will be necessary to support carrying out the work effectively.

Page 9: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

• Consider a provision for meals, tea/coffee and snacks, and related catering arrangements. Estimate days required, who will supply it, and the required food items, so that a budget can be prepared. Consider if there will be any large community-wide events requiring substantial catering, such as at the PCVA process outset and/or completion. Discuss with the community how this is to be best arranged as well as funding requirements.

• As a general policy, do not offer payment to community members for participating in the PCVA. This can potentially cause problems with the facilitation team and within the community, and may even skew the results of the PCVA. Pay only if any services from the community are used, such as venue rental, catering or transport, but make sure to match it to local standards.

• Budget some money for sundry expenses related to the PCVA. For example, paying for transport of community members to participate in the PCVA; or, paying somebody to relieve women of their household tasks so that they are free to engage in the PCVA. Make allowances for expenses which cannot be anticipated.

Health• PCVA can at times be a physically demanding

process, and in many countries field conditions can be harsh. Ensure that facilitation team members are in good health and able to withstand hardship, if necessary.

• There should be a plan for medical emergencies. Carry a well-equipped first-aid kit, and if possible, at least one of the team members should be trained in basic first-aid.

• Make a note of the nearest health clinic or medical centre in case of emergencies, and have an understanding of the travelling time required and mode of quickest transfer.

• As with the facilitation team, ensure that excessive demands are not placed on the community participants. While maintaining that PCVA is a time-consuming and intensive process, care should be taken that the PCVA sessions and exercises do not exhaust the team and participants. Note the weather conditions (too hot, too cold, rainy, etc) and adjust the sessions accordingly so as not to cause discomfort or physical exertion.

• Ensure all team members are briefed on any security guidelines and that these are followed.

Page 10: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 7

Groundwork• If the facilitation team is not familiar with the

community, make an initial visit to establish preliminary contacts. Try to identify and meet a few key members or leaders of the community, including women leaders, who may act as focal contact points during the PCVA stages. Always be open about the purpose of the PCVA and take care that no expectations are created in regards to funding or material inputs in association with the facilitation team.

• At the early stages of the PCVA, identify key informants within the community – people who have deep knowledge of the local context and the community, or are networked to a wider set of links. Such people can be interviewed separately to complement the findings of the PCVA. This should include a range of people from young to old, women and men.

• Explore options for venues where the PCVA process will be undertaken, which are most preferable to the community. Find out if there is a community meeting hall or communal building where the PCVA can be conducted, and what facilities it has. It may be preferable to conduct the PVCA in a few different locations that are more appropriate for specific groups. There might not be a building or built facility for meetings, so it might be necessary to conduct the PCVA in houses, homesteads, courtyards or fields.

• Make an effort right from the beginning to understand the basic work schedules of the community members, both women and men, and different livelihood groups. Based on this, plan the PCVA sessions around the availability of community members according to time of the day and year. This will vary by season, location, nature of community, gender etc. In many cases shorter seasons are likely to have more people attending. For example in some agricultural communities, a slow period follows the harvest of the main crop, and this might prove to be a suitable time for the PCVA.

• Remember that in marginal or subsistence communities, people have heavy workloads, so do not place undue demands on their time for participating in the PCVA process. Discuss with them to what extent they are able to contribute their time and adjust the scope and schedule of the PCVA accordingly.

5. Working with Communities

Gender and Inclusion• In all cases attempt to ensure balanced

representation of women and men in the PCVA process.

• As part of the preparation, meet with local leaders and other community members to discuss who will participate in the PCVA process.

• Find out the most vulnerable groups in the community (including the elderly, disabled and ethnic/social minority groups) and identify the best ways to involve them. Separate PCVA sessions or individual meetings might be necessary, requiring a corresponding set of skills within the facilitation team.

• Ensure that barriers to participation for women are addressed as much as possible from the beginning. For example, provisions for childcare might allow participation of women, especially if nearby to the place where the PCVA is held. Or paying somebody to collect firewood would release women from this task and allow them to participate in the PCVA.

• In most societies, women have responsibility for childcare, domestic and livelihood activities. In such situations, while women may be quite visible in the community they are likely to have a heavy work burden, often working longer hours than men. The facilitation team will need to be sensitive, and plan and conduct the PCVA without making undue demands on time, and make provisions for women’s participation.

• It is important that the PVCA group processes are undertaken separately with groups of women and groups of men, ideally led by female and male facilitators respectively. Women and men are likely to speak more freely in separate groups, and it removes gendered roles that often see women sitting quietly in mixed gender meetings. Women and men will often have different knowledge bases, vulnerabilities and capacities, which are critical to capture through the PVCA processes.

• Where separate PVCA groups have been used, a final plenary session including all the groups should be held, where the PCVA findings are presented and discussed. This would promote transparency and minimise any potential for misunderstanding between the different groups.

• In many societies, children begin taking part in household work and community matters from an early age, and hence can have valuable knowledge and experience that can contribute

Page 11: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 8

to the PCVA process. Make an effort to include children as active participants in the PCVA process, and make provisions that their education or household activities are not affected. For example, pay somebody from the community to provide tuition to make up for lost time at school, or arrange for other children to help in household tasks of those children who participate in the PCVA process.

• The elderly often have knowledge and understanding that is not always easily apparent. Endeavour to get the elderly to contribute to the PCVA process and to have a stake in the community’s planning for CCA and DRR. The knowledge of the elderly, both women and men, can provide valuable contributions to the outcomes of the Historical Timeline and Long Term Trend Analysis (see Annexes 7 and 9).

Language and Literacy• While noting PCVA outcomes on paper is ideal for

capturing information and keeping a record, in some cases it might be more appropriate to draw or write on the ground with sticks, or use some other local materials. In such cases, try to take photographs of the outcomes so as to have a record for future reference. Prints of the photos should be given to the community so that they have ownership of the PCVA outcomes.

• Literacy might be an issue — some communities might be partly or not literate. Often women will have higher illiteracy rates. In such cases, pictures and symbols that are locally used and understood should be identified, and if necessary, the facilitation team should familiarise itself with them. During the course of the PCVA, such pictures and symbols should be used. Even where communities are literate, pictures/symbols can be used effectively to communicate information and ideas; be open to using such techniques.

• It is important that the community owns the data and analysis documents, and it stays in the community as an ongoing reference point for future projects. With the community’s permission, the facilitation team should make a set of copies of all the documents for the organisation’s archives; leaving originals in the community.

Malawi: Leyla Kayere, aged 76, works her rice field. Photo: Abbie Trayler-Smith/Oxfam.

Page 12: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 9

Selecting the Relevant Tools • The tools and resources presented in this toolkit

are some of the important ones and if used properly, should yield useful results. They are, however, by no means a complete set of tools. Participatory methods (RRA, PRA, PLA, etc) have been developed and used for a wide range of purposes during the last few decades.

• Many participatory methods have been adapted to local situations and used according to local needs. The first task in conducting a PCVA process is to become informed about the range of relevant toolkits available, and review them. This should be followed by an examination of the tools and resources presented here, and a decision made as to which ones are most suitable for the particular context.

• If there are other tools that seem potentially useful, consider how they might be used in the PCVA. Do not follow this toolkit mechanically; apply judgement based on the local situation and its needs and thereby decide what may or may not work. Be open to using other tools and resources, and combine and balance these with those in this toolkit.

Triangulation of Data • Some of the tools in this toolkit provide analysis

of similar issues in different ways (for example, Resource Map/ Hazard Map and Transect Walk; Historical Timeline and Long Term Trend Analysis). This allows cross-checking for inconsistencies in information, a process known as ‘triangulation’.

• Other tools beyond this toolkit can be used to triangulate the information. Therefore, even if some of the tools seem repetitious, still use a number of tools to collect and analyse similar types of information, as this will give more accurate results.

• Triangulation can also be done by asking different groups about the various issues as they relate to the community. For example ask men about women’s activities and vice versa.

• Also, conduct the same exercises with different groups that characterise the community (see Annex 1) – women and men, poor and wealthy, etc – which will allow a comparison of perceptions across the different groups.

• If resources allow, triangulate further by having different members of the facilitation team collect the same information independently and then cross-check.

6. Other Points to Consider

Involving local Authorities• Although the PCVA is intended as a community-

based exercise, in many places it can be difficult to carry out the work without the approval of local government authorities. While this can present a challenge, it can also be an opportunity. Firstly, local officials can be useful key informants and can contribute to the PCVA sessions on Governance Analysis and other local knowledge. Secondly, it may help to increase government understanding of local issues and create better linkages between the community to the government for support in implementation of community action plans.

Understanding and Addressing the Root Causes• Be careful to understand the key differences

between disasters and climate change impacts. Climate variability and weather fluctuations due to climate change can lead to extreme weather events, which can result in disasters, discussed above in the section on Key Climate Change and Disasters Concepts. However climate change is also gradually altering long-term seasonal patterns. Although this may not result in disasters directly, it can be a hazard in itself as it may affect agriculture and eco-systems based livelihoods, on which many communities are reliant.

• To understand future uncertainty (Stage 6), it will be necessary to identify hazards that may possibly be caused by climate change and/or could increase because of climate change in the future.

• Climate related changes (variable rainfall, increased heat or cold, etc) are often hard to separate from other factors causing change such as deforestation, urbanisation and population growth. Significant time and effort need to be given to find out all the changes affecting the community, to review secondary information and analyse with the community what the actual climate-related impacts are and other root factors that may be impacting communities.

• Similarly, infrastructure development can cause environmental problems (eg reduced water flow in a river due to a dam). Caution is necessary so that such effects are not confused with climate change impacts. However, there could be linkages; such developments combine with climate change and magnify impacts on communities. The PCVA should examine such changes that contribute to the community’s vulnerability.

Page 13: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 10

• The actual activities identified by the PCVA might be work being done already (tree planting, drought resistant crops, etc), but the analysis should be documented to identify any DRR activity that is being modified or expanded based on the climate change analysis. For example, a well might be built to store water in an area experiencing longer dry seasons. But if that area is also experiencing heavier rainfall during the wet season, building a check dam would regulate excess water flow. The well is a DRR measure and the check dam is a CCA measure. The PCVA should help identify such measures that link DRR and CCA for the community’s action plans.

Sre Kosaing village, Cambodia: Villagers with a water level gauge installed as part of a disaster preparedness plan. Photo: Sak Sivin/OxfamAUS.

Page 14: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

7. Guidance on PCVA Stages

This section provides guidance on each of the nine stages of the PCVA process. A set of instructions and requirements are listed first for each stage, followed by a table with an explanation of its purpose, the tasks required and questions to be answered, and the key related resources.

Stage 1 is about preparation for the PCVA and Stage 2 is concerned with supplementary secondary sources. Stages 3 to 8 comprise the main body of the PCVA, which include a series of activities to analyse various aspects of the community’s capacity and vulnerability to climate change and disasters. Stage 9 is about completion and follow-up. The annexes following this section provide details on the specific tools required to carry out the PCVA process.

Lepo village, Timor-Leste: Secondary school student Juvita Soares in Lepo village where work is being undertaken to identify and act on the impacts of climate change. Photo: Timothy Herbert/OxfamAUS.

Page 15: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 12

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Sta

ge

1 –

Pr

epa

rin

g f

or

a P

VCA

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

Prep

arin

g fo

r a P

CVA

To p

repa

re fo

r co

nduc

ting

the

PCVA

Defin

e an

d de

velo

p Te

rms

of R

efer

ence

(ToR

) for

the

proc

ess.

Key

co

nsid

erat

ions

:

•W

hat w

ill b

e th

e ro

le o

f the

faci

litat

ion

team

?

•W

ill th

ere

be n

eed

for c

onsu

ltan

ts to

be

part

of t

he te

am o

r to

supp

ort

the

team

(eg

in-s

itu

trai

ning

)?

•W

ho in

the

team

will

be

acco

unta

ble

for l

eade

rshi

p an

d re

port

ing?

Sele

ct a

nd tr

ain

the

faci

litat

ion

team

. Key

con

side

rati

ons:

•W

ho w

ill p

rovi

de th

e tr

aini

ng (w

ithi

n th

e or

gani

sati

on o

r fro

m o

utsi

de)?

•Ho

w m

any

team

mem

bers

?

•Ge

nder

bal

ance

and

sen

siti

vity

?

•Av

aila

bilit

y an

d ti

me

com

mit

men

t?

Allo

cate

nec

essa

ry re

sour

ces

and

orga

nise

logi

stic

s. K

ey c

onsi

dera

tion

s:

•Co

st-e

ffec

tive

ness

?

•Ti

me-

fram

e?

•Ve

nue?

•M

ater

ial a

nd e

quip

men

t?

•Th

is to

olki

t its

elf w

ill b

e a

key

trai

ning

reso

urce

. To

use

it

as a

trai

ning

tool

, Pow

erPo

int p

rese

ntat

ions

will

nee

d to

be

prep

ared

and

trai

ning

exe

rcis

es d

evel

oped

.

•Ge

nera

l Tra

inin

g of

Tra

iner

s (T

oT) t

oolk

its,

suc

h as

: Fr

anki

ewic

z, C

. and

Par

rott

, L (2

006)

Par

tici

pant

’s M

anua

l: A

Guid

e to

Key

Con

tent

and

Res

ourc

es: T

rain

ing

of T

rain

ers.

Ke

nya,

Mic

roSa

ve. h

ttp:

//w

ww

.mic

rosa

ve.o

rg/t

oolk

it/

trai

ning

-of-

trai

ners

-too

lkit

•Re

leva

nt O

xfam

trai

ning

reso

urce

s, s

uch

as: T

urvi

ll,

E. a

nd D

ios,

H.B

.D. (

2009

) Par

tici

pato

ry C

apac

ity

and

Vuln

erab

ility

Ana

lysi

s Tr

aini

ng P

ack.

Oxf

ord,

Oxf

am. h

ttp:

//di

sast

erm

anag

emen

tban

glad

esh.

org/

oxfa

m_t

ools

/ind

ex.p

hp

•It

is im

port

ant t

o be

wel

l pre

pare

d be

fore

sta

rtin

g th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss. I

f don

e pr

oper

ly, P

CVA

can

be a

n el

abor

ate

and

deta

iled

proc

ess

requ

iring

sig

nific

ant

tim

e an

d sk

ill in

puts

, as

wel

l as

fund

ing.

Ade

quat

e pr

epar

atio

n pr

even

ts

any

disr

upti

on to

and

dis

cont

inui

ty o

f the

seq

uenc

e of

the

PCVA

sta

ges

and

ensu

res

its

smoo

th o

pera

tion

.

•A

few

key

per

sons

at m

anag

emen

t lev

el w

ithi

n th

e or

gani

sati

on w

ill n

eed

to o

vers

ee th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss in

clud

ing

budg

etin

g, fi

nanc

ial a

ccou

ntab

ility

, se

lect

ion

of fa

cilit

atio

n te

am m

embe

rs, a

rran

ging

trai

ning

and

revi

ew o

f re

port

ing

by th

e fa

cilit

atio

n te

am. A

t thi

s st

age,

the

man

agem

ent s

taff

will

pla

y th

e ke

y ro

le, i

n co

nsul

tati

on w

ith

the

faci

litat

ion

team

.

•Se

lect

the

appr

opria

te p

erso

ns fo

r the

faci

litat

ion

team

. It i

s im

port

ant t

hat

they

hav

e th

e rig

ht s

kills

to c

ondu

ct th

e PC

VA –

und

erst

andi

ng o

f the

loca

l co

ntex

t, e

mpa

thy

for v

ulne

rabl

e an

d m

argi

nal g

roup

s, g

ende

r sen

siti

vity

, as

wel

l as

abili

ty fo

r pro

long

ed c

omm

unit

y en

gage

men

t. T

he te

am le

ader

sho

uld

have

sig

nific

ant e

xper

ienc

e in

com

mun

ity

leve

l fac

ilita

tion

.

•Th

e m

anag

emen

t sta

ff s

houl

d de

cide

who

will

con

duct

the

trai

ning

/ind

ucti

on

of fa

cilit

ator

s. W

heth

er th

e tr

aine

rs c

an b

e dr

awn

from

wit

hin

the

orga

nisa

tion

or

con

sult

ants

will

be

requ

ired

shou

ld b

e as

sess

ed.

•De

cide

how

muc

h ti

me

this

sta

ge is

like

ly to

take

. As

a ro

ugh

guid

e,

man

agem

ent,

sta

ff s

elec

tion

and

trai

ning

arr

ange

men

ts s

houl

d be

reso

lved

w

ithi

n on

e m

onth

and

the

trai

ning

of t

he fa

cilit

atio

n te

am s

houl

d no

t tak

e m

ore

than

7 d

ays.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, the

faci

litat

ion

team

will

be

staf

fed

by s

uita

bly

skill

ed m

embe

rs, b

oth

wom

en a

nd m

en, w

ho w

ill h

ave

stro

ng u

nder

stan

ding

of

the

tool

s an

d te

chni

ques

requ

ired

for t

he P

CVA

proc

ess

Page 16: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 13

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Sta

ge

2 –

Co

llec

tin

g S

eco

nd

ar

y In

for

mat

ion

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

Prep

arin

g fo

r a P

CVA

To p

repa

re fo

r co

nduc

ting

the

PCVA

Colle

ct, c

ompa

re a

nd re

view

info

rmat

ion

abou

t loc

al, r

egio

nal a

nd n

atio

nal

leve

l iss

ues,

suc

h as

:

•Lo

cal d

emog

raph

ic a

spec

ts –

pop

ulat

ion

dens

ity

and

grow

th tr

ends

, m

igra

tion

pat

tern

s, e

tc.

•Co

mm

unit

y st

ruct

ure,

incl

udin

g ge

nder

dis

aggr

egat

ed in

form

atio

n. K

ey

aspe

cts

incl

ude

mal

e–fe

mal

e ra

tio,

age

gro

ups,

eth

nici

ty a

nd re

ligio

n,

cult

ure

and

beha

viou

r pat

tern

s.

Sour

ces

for n

atio

nal,

regi

onal

and

loca

l dat

a in

clud

ing:

•Na

tion

al c

ensu

s an

d st

atis

tics

off

ices

.

•Lo

cal,

mun

icip

al a

nd d

istr

ict g

over

nmen

t off

ices

.

•Re

sour

ce c

entr

es o

f NGO

s an

d UN

age

ncie

s.

•Lo

cal u

rban

and

regi

onal

dev

elop

men

t pla

nnin

g of

fices

.

•GI

S an

d ca

rtog

raph

y of

fices

for m

aps.

•Be

fore

sta

ring

the

PCVA

pro

cess

, an

exte

nsiv

e an

d th

orou

gh re

view

of l

ocal

ly

rele

vant

sec

onda

ry in

form

atio

n w

ill a

llow

the

faci

litat

ion

team

to g

ain

the

nece

ssar

y ba

ckgr

ound

kno

wle

dge.

Thi

s se

cond

ary

info

rmat

ion

will

als

o al

low

cr

oss-

chec

king

and

com

parin

g of

the

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in th

e PC

VA

proc

ess.

•A

com

preh

ensi

ve li

st is

pro

vide

d be

low

, but

not

all

the

info

rmat

ion

mig

ht b

e av

aila

ble

or e

ven

exis

t in

man

y pl

aces

. Att

empt

to c

olle

ct a

s m

uch

as p

ossi

ble

wit

hin

the

limit

atio

ns o

f the

sit

uati

on.

•On

the

othe

r han

d, d

o no

t col

lect

too

muc

h in

form

atio

n w

hich

can

lead

to

over

load

. Kee

p a

focu

s on

the

proj

ect a

t han

d an

d th

e le

vel o

f inf

orm

atio

n an

d de

tail

requ

ired.

Use

judg

emen

t to

scre

en in

form

atio

n so

that

info

rmat

ion

rela

ting

dire

ctly

to th

e co

ntex

t and

the

com

mun

ity

is s

elec

ted.

•Co

llate

the

info

rmat

ion

unde

r a fe

w k

ey g

roup

ings

: (a)

Dem

ogra

phic

, soc

ial a

nd

econ

omic

(inc

ludi

ng li

velih

oods

info

rmat

ion)

; (b)

Env

ironm

ent a

nd re

sour

ces;

(c

) Dis

aste

rs a

nd h

azar

ds; (

d) C

limat

e ch

ange

; (e)

Dev

elop

men

t and

pov

erty

. Th

is w

ill a

llow

link

ing

the

info

rmat

ion

to th

e ke

y co

ncer

ns o

f the

PCV

A.

•A

syst

em fo

r col

lati

ng, o

rgan

isin

g an

d fil

ing

info

rmat

ion

will

nee

d to

be

deve

lope

d ba

sed

on th

e gr

oupi

ngs

abov

e. D

ecid

e w

ho w

ill b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r do

ing

this

and

man

agin

g th

e sy

stem

.

•In

terp

reti

ng th

e in

form

atio

n w

ill b

e lin

ked

to h

ow it

rela

tes

to th

e co

mm

unit

y.

Wid

er n

atio

nal l

evel

dat

a w

ill n

eed

to b

e in

terp

rete

d at

the

scal

e of

the

com

mun

ity.

•Th

e in

form

atio

n m

ight

be

in v

ario

us fo

rms

– bo

oks,

repo

rts,

pol

icy

docu

men

ts,

map

s, e

tc. E

ach

of th

ese

will

hav

e to

be

revi

ewed

and

inte

rpre

ted

diff

eren

tly,

bu

t wit

h th

e co

mm

on o

bjec

tive

of u

nder

stan

ding

how

it re

late

s to

the

com

mun

ity.

•If

it is

a li

tera

te c

omm

unit

y, m

ake

a se

t of c

opie

s fo

r the

com

mun

ity

so th

at it

ca

n be

sto

red

toge

ther

wit

h th

e PC

VA o

utco

mes

. You

may

nee

d to

sum

mar

ise

or

sim

plify

info

rmat

ion

that

is c

ompl

ex o

r tec

hnic

al, o

r con

vert

into

form

ats

that

ar

e m

ore

acce

ssib

le to

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

.

•Es

tabl

ish

key

cont

act p

oint

s at

sou

rces

of s

econ

dary

info

rmat

ion.

Use

loca

l kn

owle

dge

and

netw

orks

to id

enti

fy th

e rig

ht p

eopl

e an

d so

urce

s. M

ake

arra

ngem

ents

for g

etti

ng p

erm

issi

on if

nec

essa

ry to

acc

ess

and

use

the

info

rmat

ion.

.

•Di

vide

the

key

task

s am

ong

the

faci

litat

ion

team

– c

olle

ctin

g, c

olla

ting

, in

terp

reti

ng –

acc

ordi

ng to

ski

ll se

ts. A

ltho

ugh

all t

eam

mem

bers

sho

uld

have

a

leve

l of i

nvol

vem

ent i

n al

l the

task

s, d

ivid

ing

up th

e m

ain

role

s w

ill a

llow

bet

ter

utili

sati

on o

f tim

e an

d re

sour

ces.

•Ar

rang

emen

ts fo

r mak

ing

and

fund

ing

phot

ocop

ies

will

hav

e to

be

mad

e.

•Ar

rang

emen

ts a

nd fu

ndin

g fo

r tra

nspo

rt o

f dat

a co

llect

ion

will

hav

e to

be

mad

e.

•De

cide

how

muc

h ti

me

this

sta

ge is

like

ly to

take

. Do

not s

pend

a s

igni

fican

t am

ount

of t

ime

on th

is s

tage

, rou

ghly

a c

oupl

e of

wee

ks, s

o th

at m

ore

tim

e ca

n be

allo

cate

d fo

r the

PCV

A it

self.

•At

the

end

of th

is s

tage

, the

faci

litat

ion

team

sho

uld

have

a g

ood

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

loca

l con

text

and

how

key

issu

es re

late

to th

e co

mm

unit

y. T

he te

am s

houl

d al

so h

ave

a co

llect

ion

of s

econ

dary

reso

urce

s to

co

mpa

re w

ith

the

findi

ngs

of th

e PC

VA.

Page 17: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 14

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

•Li

velih

oods

: Key

loca

l liv

elih

oods

, inc

ludi

ng g

ende

r dis

aggr

egat

ed

info

rmat

ion.

Info

rmat

ion

on h

ome-

base

d liv

elih

oods

and

wor

k by

ch

ildre

n an

d th

e el

derly

.

•En

viro

nmen

t: B

oth

natu

ral (

topo

grap

hy, e

leva

tion

, for

est c

over

, wat

er

bodi

es, e

tc) a

nd m

an-m

ade

(land

-use

pat

tern

s, a

gric

ultu

re, s

ettl

emen

t pa

tter

ns, i

nfra

stru

ctur

e, e

tc).

•Na

tura

l res

ourc

es: W

ater

, soi

l, m

iner

als,

veg

etat

ion,

fore

st, r

iver

ine

and

mar

ine

prod

ucts

.

•Di

sast

er p

rofil

e: H

azar

d ty

pes,

freq

uenc

y an

d in

tens

ity.

Foc

us

prim

arily

on

hydr

o-m

eteo

rolo

gica

l dis

aste

rs, b

ut if

oth

er d

isas

ters

ar

e si

gnifi

cant

in th

e ar

ea, t

hose

wou

ld a

lso

need

to b

e ta

ken

into

co

nsid

erat

ion.

•Ch

ange

s in

wea

ther

pat

tern

s an

d re

sour

ce a

vaila

bilit

y: L

ocal

wea

ther

da

ta a

nd h

isto

rical

tren

ds, a

nd w

heth

er th

ese

have

am

plifi

ed re

cent

ly.

Pay

part

icul

ar a

tten

tion

to ra

infa

ll, h

eat,

col

d an

d dr

ynes

s.

•Cl

imat

e pr

ojec

tion

s: D

owns

cale

d lo

cal c

limat

e ch

ange

mod

els,

and

na

tion

al a

nd lo

cal c

limat

e st

udie

s.

•De

velo

pmen

t pla

ns, p

olic

ies

and

stra

tegi

es: N

atio

nal p

over

ty re

duct

ion

stra

tegy

pap

ers,

clim

ate

chan

ge s

trat

egie

s, d

isas

ter r

isk

redu

ctio

n po

licie

s, a

nd u

rban

and

regi

onal

pla

nnin

g po

licy

fram

ewor

ks.

•Or

gani

sati

ons

wor

king

on

DRR/

CCA:

Ded

icat

ed n

atio

nal l

ine

min

istr

ies

and

depa

rtm

ents

, key

bi/

mul

ti-l

ater

al p

rogr

ams,

INGO

s, lo

cal N

GOs

and

CBOs

. Foc

us o

n th

ose

that

are

mos

t act

ive

in th

e ar

ea w

here

the

PCVA

is

bei

ng c

ondu

cted

.

•Re

mot

e se

nsin

g of

fices

for s

atel

lite

phot

os a

nd m

aps.

•M

eteo

rolo

gica

l off

ices

and

wea

ther

sta

tion

s.

•Na

tion

al a

nd lo

cal l

ibra

ries.

•Ci

vil s

ecto

r for

ums.

Key

polic

y an

d st

rate

gy d

ocum

ents

incl

udin

g:

•Na

tion

al d

evel

opm

ent p

lan,

pov

erty

redu

ctio

n st

rate

gy

pape

r.

•Na

tion

al A

dapt

atio

n Pr

ogra

m o

f Act

ion

(NAP

A), c

limat

e ch

ange

targ

et p

rogr

am o

r str

ateg

y pa

per.

•Na

tion

al D

RR p

latf

orm

.

•Hy

ogo

Fram

ewor

k of

Act

ion

mon

itor

ing

repo

rts.

•UN

FCCC

nat

iona

l com

mun

icat

ions

.

•In

terg

over

nmen

tal P

anel

on

Clim

ate

Chan

ge (I

PCC)

as

sess

men

t rep

orts

– re

gion

al c

hapt

ers.

•UN

ISDR

cam

paig

ns.

•UN

DP, U

NOCH

A or

UN

coun

try

offic

e jo

urna

l art

icle

s.

Sta

ge

2 –

Co

llec

tin

g S

eco

nd

ar

y In

for

mat

ion

co

nt

...

Page 18: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 15

Sta

ge

3 –

Gen

erat

ing

a c

om

mu

nit

y o

ver

vie

w

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

(Mos

t of t

he fo

llow

ing

also

app

lies

to s

ubse

quen

t Sta

ges

4–8)

•Th

is is

a c

ritic

al s

tage

as

it p

rom

otes

a b

ette

r und

erst

andi

ng o

f the

nat

ure

of

the

com

mun

ity,

its

envi

ronm

ent a

nd re

sour

ces;

ser

ving

as

a st

eppi

ng s

tone

to

an a

naly

sis

of c

apac

ity

and

vuln

erab

ility

. Tim

e sp

ent o

n th

is s

tage

als

o he

lps

to

build

and

str

engt

hen

rapp

ort w

ith

the

com

mun

ity.

•Es

tabl

ish

cont

act w

ith

the

com

mun

ity

and

deci

de a

dat

e, ti

me

and

plac

e fo

r an

init

ial c

omm

unit

y m

eeti

ng.

•Fo

r tra

nspa

renc

y an

d ac

coun

tabi

lity,

mak

e su

re th

at th

e co

mm

unit

y is

aw

are

of th

e na

ture

and

pur

pose

of t

he P

CVA

proc

ess,

and

und

erst

and

that

the

info

rmat

ion

will

be

used

for a

ctio

n pl

anni

ng fo

r CCA

and

DRR

of t

he c

omm

unit

y.

Spen

d as

muc

h ti

me

as n

eces

sary

at t

he b

egin

ning

so

that

the

com

mun

ity

is

fully

aw

are

of th

is a

nd th

ere

are

no w

rong

exp

ecta

tion

s.

•Hi

ghlig

ht th

at th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ion

of c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs is

vol

unta

ry a

nd

conn

ecte

d to

str

engt

heni

ng c

apac

ity

and

redu

cing

vul

nera

bilit

y w

ithi

n th

eir

own

com

mun

ity,

and

the

orga

nisa

tion

doe

s no

t hav

e an

y ve

sted

inte

rest

. Ex

plai

n th

at p

arti

cipa

nts

are

free

to w

ithd

raw

at a

ny s

tage

of t

he P

CVA,

but

it

wou

ld b

e us

eful

to d

iscu

ss th

e re

ason

s fo

r tha

t wit

h th

e fa

cilit

atio

n te

am.

•Th

e te

am s

houl

d be

ope

n to

rece

ivin

g an

y fe

edba

ck, q

uest

ions

and

com

plai

nts

thro

ugho

ut th

e co

urse

of t

he P

CVA,

and

exp

lain

that

all

effo

rt w

ill b

e m

ade

to

addr

ess

thes

e to

mut

ual s

atis

fact

ion.

•De

cide

the

loca

tion

(s) w

here

the

PCVA

pro

cess

will

be

unde

rtak

en. I

f the

re is

no

com

mun

ity

build

ing,

dis

cuss

and

see

k ag

reem

ent o

n su

itab

le p

lace

s w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y.

•Co

llabo

rati

vely

dec

ide

who

and

how

man

y pe

rson

s fr

om th

e co

mm

unit

y w

ill

part

icip

ate

in th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss.

•En

sure

bal

ance

d re

pres

enta

tion

(the

par

tici

pati

on o

f wom

en, c

hild

ren

and

the

elde

rly).

•If

it is

eas

ier,

the

faci

litat

ion

team

can

iden

tify

a li

st o

f spe

cific

que

stio

ns to

an

swer

thro

ugh

this

pro

cess

, rel

evan

t to

the

com

mun

ity

and

the

proj

ect/

proc

ess

the

PVCA

is c

onne

cted

to. T

his

may

hel

p to

mai

ntai

n a

focu

s,

part

icul

arly

if th

ere

are

tim

e lim

itat

ions

. How

ever

, thi

s do

es n

ot m

ean

disc

ussi

ons

led

by c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs s

houl

d be

sto

pped

if th

ey d

o no

t an

swer

que

stio

ns, r

athe

r the

y ca

n ac

t as

a gu

ide

for f

acili

tati

ng d

iscu

ssio

ns.

•Sh

ould

invo

lve

sess

ions

wit

h a

rang

e of

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

to tr

iang

ulat

e th

e in

form

atio

n ga

ther

ed (s

ee s

ecti

on 6

abo

ve).

Depe

ndin

g on

the

loca

l ci

rcum

stan

ces,

tria

ngul

atio

n m

ight

invo

lve

mee

ting

sep

arat

ely

wit

h co

mm

unit

y le

ader

s an

d th

en w

ith

spec

ific

grou

ps (e

.g. w

omen

and

men

, wea

lthy

and

rich

, di

ffer

ent l

ivel

ihoo

d gr

oups

, etc

). It

is a

lway

s us

eful

to id

enti

fy k

ey in

form

ants

an

d ha

ve s

epar

ate

mee

ting

s w

ith

them

.

•Fi

nalis

e th

e sc

hedu

le th

roug

h di

scus

sion

wit

h th

e co

mm

unit

y ac

cord

ing

to

suit

abili

ty a

nd a

vaila

bilit

y of

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

. Con

side

r if p

eopl

e w

ill

have

to ta

ke ti

me

off f

rom

wor

k to

take

par

t in

the

PCVA

and

whe

ther

it c

an

be s

ched

uled

for w

hen

they

hav

e fr

ee ti

me.

Con

side

r if s

peci

al p

rovi

sion

s an

d as

soci

ated

fund

ing

will

be

requ

ired

for w

omen

and

oth

er v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

to

part

icip

ate.

•En

sure

pro

visi

on a

nd fu

ndin

g fo

r equ

ipm

ent a

nd s

tati

oner

y. F

ind

out i

f the

se

mat

eria

ls c

an b

e st

ored

saf

ely

in th

e co

mm

unit

y du

ring

the

dura

tion

of t

he

PCVA

. If t

hese

mat

eria

ls a

re n

ot a

ppro

pria

te fo

r the

com

mun

ity,

ass

ess

loca

lly

suit

able

mat

eria

ls (e

g st

icks

to d

raw

on

the

grou

nd, s

tone

s, s

eeds

, etc

).

•M

ake

arra

ngem

ents

and

pro

vide

fund

ing

for l

ocal

tran

spor

t to

the

com

mun

ity.

Fi

nd o

ut if

com

mun

ity

part

icip

ants

will

requ

ire fu

ndin

g fo

r tra

nspo

rt to

att

end

the

PCVA

.

•De

velo

p a

syst

em fo

r col

lati

ng, o

rgan

isin

g an

d fil

ing

info

rmat

ion.

Onc

e ag

ain,

di

strib

ute

thes

e ta

sks

betw

een

the

team

.

•De

cide

how

muc

h ti

me

this

sta

ge w

ill ta

ke a

nd h

ow m

uch

tim

e to

allo

cate

for

each

ses

sion

. Pre

pare

a w

orks

hop-

type

age

nda

wit

h ti

me

slot

s fo

r diff

eren

t se

ssio

ns. H

owev

er, b

e fle

xibl

e. It

may

not

alw

ays

be p

ossi

ble

to s

tick

to th

e sc

hedu

le, s

o bu

ild in

allo

wan

ce fo

r tha

t in

the

sche

dule

. As

a ro

ugh

esti

mat

e,

a fe

w d

ays

shou

ld b

e ad

equa

te, b

ut w

ill d

epen

d on

a ra

nge

of fa

ctor

s —

tim

e av

aila

bilit

y of

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

, wea

ther

, pre

viou

s as

sess

men

ts e

tc.

•Co

nsid

er if

ther

e w

ill b

e pr

ovis

ion

for l

unch

es, t

ea/c

offe

e an

d sn

acks

, and

re

late

d ca

terin

g ar

rang

emen

ts.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, the

faci

litat

ion

team

sho

uld

have

an

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

how

the

com

mun

ity

is s

truc

ture

d, w

hat g

roup

s ex

ist w

ithi

n it

an

d th

eir r

elat

ive

sign

ifica

nce.

Kno

wle

dge

shou

ld a

lso

be g

aine

d of

the

livin

g pa

tter

ns o

f the

com

mun

ity,

pow

er s

truc

ture

s, it

s en

viro

nmen

t, re

sour

ces

and

infr

astr

uctu

re.

Page 19: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 16

Sta

ge

3 –

Gen

erat

ing

a c

om

mu

nit

y o

ver

vie

w c

on

t ..

.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Orga

nise

com

mun

ity

mee

ting

to in

trod

uce

purp

ose,

pro

cess

, who

is in

volv

ed

and

expe

ctat

ions

of t

he c

omm

unit

y.

Begi

n th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss th

roug

h pa

rtic

ipat

ory

com

mun

ity

enga

gem

ent.

Find

out

the

follo

win

g co

ntex

tual

info

rmat

ion:

•Ge

nder

and

gen

erat

iona

l rol

es in

the

com

mun

ity.

•Co

mm

unit

y po

wer

str

uctu

res

and

hier

arch

ies.

•W

hich

gro

ups

and

orga

nisa

tion

s ex

ist w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y,

part

icul

arly

wit

h re

gard

s to

CCA

and

DRR

.

•W

hich

gov

ernm

enta

l, NG

O an

d pr

ivat

e se

ctor

inst

itut

ions

exi

st w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y, a

nd w

hat o

ther

ext

erna

l ins

titu

tion

s do

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

inte

ract

wit

h.

•W

hat n

atur

al a

nd p

hysi

cal r

esou

rces

are

impo

rtan

t to

livel

ihoo

ds, l

ife

and

wel

l-be

ing

in th

e co

mm

unit

y.

•Pl

ate

Diag

ram

to s

how

the

com

posi

tion

of p

opul

atio

n gr

oups

(Ann

ex 1

).

•Da

ily T

ime

Char

t to

show

how

peo

ple

spen

d th

eir t

ime

over

th

e co

urse

of a

day

(Ann

ex 2

).

•Ve

nn/C

ircle

Dia

gram

to s

how

diff

eren

t act

ors

in th

e co

mm

unit

y an

d ho

w th

ey in

tera

ct (A

nnex

3).

•Re

sour

ce m

ap to

reco

rd in

form

atio

n ab

out n

atur

al a

nd

phys

ical

reso

urce

s (A

nnex

4).

•Tr

anse

ct w

alk

to m

ake

obse

rvat

ions

abo

ut th

e co

mm

unit

y,

its

reso

urce

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

(Ann

ex 5

). Th

is c

an a

lso

be a

tool

to lo

ok fo

r evi

denc

e of

pas

t haz

ards

and

cha

nge,

fe

edin

g in

to th

e w

ork

done

in th

e ne

xt S

tage

4.

Gene

rati

ng a

co

mm

unit

y ov

ervi

ewTo

gen

erat

e a

shar

ed

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

th

e co

mm

unit

y’s

com

posi

tion

, so

cial

and

pol

itic

al

stru

ctur

es,

livel

ihoo

ds a

nd

reso

urce

s.

Page 20: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 17

Sta

ge

4 —

An

aly

sis

of

ha

zar

ds

an

d s

tres

ses,

an

d v

uln

era

bil

ity

an

d c

apa

city

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•M

uch

of th

e in

stru

ctio

ns/r

equi

rem

ents

for S

tage

3 w

ill a

lso

appl

y to

this

sta

ge

incl

udin

g th

ose

conc

erni

ng g

ende

r bal

ance

, inc

lusi

on o

f vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

flexi

bilit

y, tr

iang

ulat

ion

and

logi

stic

s (t

imin

g, lo

cati

on, c

ater

ing,

etc

).

•Th

is is

a k

ey s

tage

as

it b

uild

s on

the

prev

ious

sta

ges

to fo

cus

on is

sues

ce

ntra

l to

the

PCVA

, tha

t is,

cap

acit

y an

d vu

lner

abili

ty.

•At

this

sta

ge it

is im

port

ant t

o go

bey

ond

only

pas

t haz

ards

and

dis

aste

rs

and

iden

tify

cha

ngin

g cl

imat

ic p

atte

rns.

Thi

s ca

n in

clud

e ch

ange

d ra

infa

ll an

d se

ason

al p

atte

rns,

var

iati

on in

rive

r flo

ws,

sal

twat

er in

trus

ion,

and

oth

er

rela

ted

chan

ges

such

as

frui

t/ve

geta

ble

ripen

ing,

inse

ct in

fest

atio

n or

bird

m

igra

tion

.

•Th

e se

cond

ary

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in S

tage

2 c

an b

e us

eful

at t

his

stag

e. T

his

outs

ide

info

rmat

ion

can

be u

sed

to c

ompl

emen

t the

dis

cuss

ions

on

com

mun

ity

know

ledg

e an

d ex

perie

nce

on c

limat

e ch

ange

and

dis

aste

rs.

•Du

ring

this

sta

ge a

lso

obse

rve

and

reco

rd e

vide

nce

of h

azar

ds, i

f any

— m

arks

le

ft b

y flo

odin

g in

dica

ting

floo

d le

vel,

dam

aged

hou

ses,

dry

wel

ls o

r fie

lds,

etc

. Th

e Tr

anse

ct W

alk

tool

dis

cuss

ed in

Sta

ge 3

can

be

usef

ul a

t thi

s st

age

to lo

ok

for e

vide

nce

of p

ast h

azar

ds a

nd c

hang

e.

•Th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ion

of e

lder

ly c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs, b

oth

wom

en a

nd m

en, i

s ve

ry

impo

rtan

t at t

his

stag

e to

get

an

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

hist

ory

of d

isas

ters

and

ch

ange

d cl

imat

ic p

atte

rns.

•If

it is

eas

ier,

the

faci

litat

ion

team

can

iden

tify

a li

st o

f spe

cific

que

stio

ns

to a

nsw

er th

roug

h th

is p

roce

ss, r

elev

ant t

o th

e co

mm

unit

y co

ntex

t and

th

e pr

ojec

t/pr

oces

s th

e PV

CA is

con

nect

ed to

. Thi

s m

ay h

elp

to m

aint

ain

a fo

cus,

par

ticu

larly

if th

ere

are

tim

e lim

itat

ions

. How

ever

, thi

s do

es n

ot m

ean

disc

ussi

ons

led

by c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs s

houl

d be

sto

pped

if th

ey d

o no

t an

swer

que

stio

ns, r

athe

r the

y ca

n ac

t as

a gu

ide

for f

acili

tati

ng d

iscu

ssio

ns.

•As

this

sta

ge is

cen

tral

to th

e PC

VA, d

evot

e ad

equa

te ti

me

to it

. Alt

houg

h th

ere

are

few

er e

xerc

ises

com

pare

d to

som

e of

the

othe

r ses

sion

s, s

pend

suf

ficie

nt

tim

e in

the

anal

ysis

and

tria

ngul

atio

n pr

oces

s. T

his

stag

e ca

n ta

ke u

p to

one

w

eek.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, the

com

mun

ity

shou

ld h

ave

a cl

eare

r un

ders

tand

ing

of it

s ca

paci

ty a

nd v

ulne

rabi

lity

and

the

faci

litat

ion

team

m

embe

rs s

houl

d ha

ve a

n ex

pand

ed u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he c

onte

xt a

nd

com

mun

ity

in te

rms

of it

s pa

st a

nd p

rese

nt h

azar

ds, w

eath

er a

nd c

limat

ic

patt

erns

.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Anal

ysis

of h

azar

ds

and

stre

sses

, and

vu

lner

abili

ty a

nd

capa

city

To e

nabl

e co

mm

unit

y m

embe

rs to

an

alys

e di

ffer

ent

haza

rds

and

thei

r st

ress

es, a

nd th

eir

vuln

erab

ility

and

ca

paci

ty to

dea

l wit

h th

em.

Iden

tify

asp

ects

of v

ulne

rabi

lity

bein

g ex

perie

nced

in th

e co

mm

unit

y,

disc

ussi

ng a

nd c

olle

ctin

g in

form

atio

n on

:

•Hi

stor

y of

dis

aste

rs in

the

area

, and

if p

atte

rns

rela

ting

to th

ese

even

ts

have

cha

nged

(and

why

).

•Ob

serv

atio

ns o

n ot

her c

hang

es to

clim

ate

cond

itio

ns.

•Ot

her e

vent

s, c

ondi

tion

s or

tren

ds th

at th

e co

mm

unit

y fe

els

unab

le to

co

pe w

ith

or a

dapt

to.

•W

hat t

he im

pact

of s

uch

even

ts a

nd c

hang

es h

as b

een.

•Ho

w c

omm

unit

ies

(and

diff

eren

t gro

ups)

hav

e m

anag

ed th

ese

even

ts

and

chan

ges.

•So

cial

, env

ironm

enta

l or e

cono

mic

ass

ets

wit

hin

the

com

mun

ity

that

ha

ve b

een

relie

d on

.

•So

cial

, env

ironm

enta

l or e

cono

mic

ass

ets

outs

ide

of th

e co

mm

unit

y th

at h

ave

been

relie

d on

.

•Ha

zard

Map

to re

cord

info

rmat

ion

abou

t diff

eren

t typ

es o

f ha

zard

s (A

nnex

4).

•Se

ason

al C

alen

dar f

or w

eath

er p

atte

rns

durin

g an

ann

ual

cycl

e (A

nnex

6).

•Hi

stor

ical

Tim

elin

e to

und

erst

and

the

broa

d hi

stor

y of

di

sast

ers,

and

clim

atic

tren

ds o

ver t

ime

(Ann

ex 7

).

•Ke

y in

form

ant i

nter

view

s to

find

out

abo

ut d

iffer

ent s

ocia

l an

d liv

elih

ood

grou

ps in

the

com

mun

ity

and

thei

r per

cept

ions

ab

out v

ulne

rabi

lity

and

capa

city

. Pos

sibl

y sp

ecifi

c m

embe

rs

of th

e co

mm

unit

y m

ay h

ave

bett

er k

now

ledg

e on

the

abov

e is

sues

(esp

ecia

lly e

lder

ly p

erso

ns) t

han

the

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

taki

ng p

art i

n th

e PC

VA. S

eek

the

help

of s

uch

peop

le a

s ke

y in

form

ants

.

•Ha

zard

Map

to re

cord

info

rmat

ion

abou

t diff

eren

t typ

es o

f ha

zard

s (A

nnex

4).

Page 21: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 18

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

•Ex

perie

nces

of h

ouse

hold

food

sec

urit

y.

•Gr

oups

livi

ng in

pov

erty

and

the

reas

ons

for t

hat (

gend

er, d

isab

ility

, re

ligio

n, e

thni

city

, etc

).

Build

on

the

abov

e in

form

atio

n an

d fin

d ou

t mor

e in

-dep

th in

form

atio

n on

di

ffer

ent t

ypes

of h

azar

ds a

nd s

tres

ses

that

impa

ct o

n th

e co

mm

unit

y, a

nd

capa

city

wit

hin

the

com

mun

ity

for r

esili

ence

and

ada

ptat

ion.

Expl

ore

beyo

nd th

e ob

viou

s an

d tr

y to

reve

al h

idde

n st

reng

ths

and

pote

ntia

l re

sour

ces.

•Se

ason

al C

alen

dar f

or w

eath

er p

atte

rns

durin

g an

ann

ual

cycl

e (A

nnex

6).

•Hi

stor

ical

Tim

elin

e to

und

erst

and

the

broa

d hi

stor

y of

di

sast

ers,

and

clim

atic

tren

ds o

ver t

ime

(Ann

ex 7

).

•Ke

y in

form

ant i

nter

view

s to

find

out

abo

ut d

iffer

ent

soci

al a

nd li

velih

ood

grou

ps in

the

com

mun

ity

and

thei

r pe

rcep

tion

s ab

out v

ulne

rabi

lity

and

capa

city

. Pos

sibl

y sp

ecifi

c m

embe

rs o

f the

com

mun

ity

may

hav

e be

tter

kn

owle

dge

on th

e ab

ove

issu

es (e

spec

ially

eld

erly

pe

rson

s) th

an th

e co

mm

unit

y m

embe

rs ta

king

par

t in

the

PCVA

. See

k th

e he

lp o

f suc

h pe

ople

as

key

info

rman

ts.

Sta

ge

4 —

An

aly

sis

of

ha

zar

ds

an

d s

tres

ses,

an

d v

uln

era

bil

ity

an

d c

apa

city

co

nt

...

Page 22: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 19

Sta

ge

5 —

An

aly

sis

of

liv

elih

oo

ds

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•M

uch

of th

e in

stru

ctio

ns/r

equi

rem

ents

for S

tage

3 w

ill a

lso

appl

y to

this

sta

ge

incl

udin

g th

ose

conc

erni

ng g

ende

r bal

ance

, inc

lusi

on o

f vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

flexi

bilit

y, tr

iang

ulat

ion

and

logi

stic

s (t

imin

g, lo

cati

on, c

ater

ing,

etc

).

•Th

is s

tage

is im

port

ant a

s it

will

allo

w a

bet

ter u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he im

pact

s of

di

sast

ers

and

clim

ate

chan

ge o

n liv

elih

oods

in th

e co

mm

unit

y. P

arti

cula

rly in

po

or a

nd m

argi

nal c

omm

unit

ies,

live

lihoo

ds a

re c

ruci

al a

nd h

ighl

y vu

lner

able

to

haza

rds

and

wea

ther

fluc

tuat

ions

. It i

s th

eref

ore

very

impo

rtan

t to

incl

ude

such

in

form

atio

n in

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f com

mun

ity

acti

on p

lans

.

•Ho

wev

er a

focu

s on

live

lihoo

ds s

houl

d no

t exc

lude

dis

cuss

ion

on o

ther

issu

es

impo

rtan

t to

the

com

mun

ity.

Add

itio

nal t

ools

/act

ivit

ies

can

be u

nder

take

n to

an

alys

e ot

her s

ecto

rs s

uch

as h

ealt

h, W

ASH

or n

atur

al re

sour

ce m

anag

emen

t.

•Di

scus

sion

s on

live

lihoo

ds, i

ncom

e an

d po

vert

y ca

n be

sen

siti

ve. R

espe

ct lo

cal

sens

itiv

itie

s an

d th

e va

lues

of t

he P

CVA

part

icip

ants

and

oth

er c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs.

•In

som

e ca

ses,

it m

ight

be

usef

ul to

mak

e si

te v

isit

s to

pla

ces

whe

re p

eopl

e w

ork.

Wit

h pe

rmis

sion

reco

rd th

e de

tails

of s

uch

wor

k pl

aces

wit

h ph

otog

raph

s as

futu

re re

fere

nce

mat

eria

l.

•Th

e Tr

anse

ct W

alk

tool

can

als

o be

use

ful t

o kn

ow a

bout

the

plac

es w

here

pe

ople

wor

k an

d th

e im

port

ant l

ivel

ihoo

d ar

eas

of th

e co

mm

unit

y.

•En

sure

that

the

anal

ysis

of l

ivel

ihoo

ds is

dis

aggr

egat

ed b

y ge

nder

. Exp

lore

the

invo

lvem

ent o

f chi

ldre

n an

d th

e el

derly

in li

velih

ood

acti

viti

es.

•Th

is is

a re

lati

vely

focu

sed

stag

e an

d sh

ould

requ

ire u

p to

a fe

w d

ays

to

com

plet

e, a

nd c

an b

e un

dert

aken

in c

onju

ncti

on w

ith

Stag

e 4.

•At

the

end

of th

e st

age

the

faci

litat

ion

team

sho

uld

know

wha

t the

mai

n liv

elih

oods

are

in th

e co

mm

unit

y, h

ow th

ey a

re v

ulne

rabl

e an

d w

hat p

oten

tial

ex

ists

for i

ncre

asin

g ca

paci

ty. F

or th

e co

mm

unit

y, th

e an

alys

is s

houl

d as

sist

no

t onl

y in

und

erst

andi

ng th

e vu

lner

abili

ty o

f the

ir liv

elih

oods

, but

als

o w

hat u

nder

lyin

g st

reng

ths

exis

t in

the

com

mun

ity

that

can

redu

ce ri

sks

and

faci

litat

e ad

apta

tion

of l

ivel

ihoo

ds to

pre

sent

(and

futu

re) h

azar

ds a

nd c

limat

e ch

ange

.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Anal

ysis

of

livel

ihoo

dsTo

iden

tify

so

cio-

econ

omic

ch

arac

teris

tics

of

gro

ups

in th

e co

mm

unit

y an

d un

ders

tand

thei

r re

sour

ces

for

resi

lienc

e to

clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd d

isas

ters

.

•Ta

ke in

to a

ccou

nt in

form

atio

n al

read

y co

llect

ed, p

arti

cula

rly in

Sta

ges

2 an

d 3,

and

di

scus

s fu

rthe

r and

col

lect

mor

e in

form

atio

n to

com

plet

e a

livel

ihoo

ds a

naly

sis:

•M

ain

livel

ihoo

d gr

oups

wit

hin

the

com

mun

ity

and

wha

t cyc

les

they

follo

w.

•W

hat o

ther

ext

erna

l age

nts

are

invo

lved

in th

e liv

elih

ood

grou

ps (e

.g. m

arke

ts,

tran

spor

t, in

put p

rovi

ders

).

•W

hich

gro

ups

or li

velih

oods

are

mor

e ec

onom

ical

ly v

ulne

rabl

e or

una

ble

to c

ope

wit

h ha

zard

s or

str

esse

s (e

g w

omen

).

•Po

siti

ve a

nd n

egat

ive

copi

ng s

trat

egie

s.

•Ke

y co

nstr

aint

s an

d op

port

unit

ies

face

d by

eac

h vu

lner

able

live

lihoo

d gr

oup.

•W

heth

er li

velih

oods

are

bei

ng a

ffec

ted

by lo

nger

term

cha

nges

(eg

wea

ther

pat

tern

s an

d cl

imat

e), w

hich

will

nee

d to

be

expl

ored

mor

e.

•W

here

com

mun

ity

mem

bers

mig

ht s

eek

supp

ort i

n de

velo

ping

thei

r liv

elih

oods

.

•Al

tern

ativ

e liv

elih

ood

oppo

rtun

itie

s.

•Ga

ps a

nd o

ppor

tuni

ties

in re

lati

on to

ext

erna

l ins

titu

tion

s w

hich

aff

ect l

ivel

ihoo

ds.

•Se

ason

al C

alen

dar t

o id

enti

fy li

velih

ood

acti

viti

es d

urin

g th

e ye

ar (A

nnex

6).

•Ra

nkin

g th

roug

h fo

cus

grou

p di

scus

sion

s to

id

enti

fy k

ey p

oor a

nd v

ulne

rabl

e liv

elih

ood

grou

ps (A

nnex

8).

Also

cro

ss-r

efer

to

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in S

tage

3 a

nd S

tage

4.

•Ke

y in

form

ant i

nter

view

s or

gro

up in

terv

iew

s re

pres

enti

ng d

iffer

ent v

ulne

rabl

e liv

elih

ood

grou

ps. I

f it p

rove

s co

nven

ient

, com

bine

thes

e in

terv

iew

s w

ith

key

info

rman

t int

ervi

ews

of

Stag

e 4.

Page 23: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 20

Sta

ge

6 —

An

aly

sis

of

futu

re

un

cer

tain

ty

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•M

uch

of th

e in

stru

ctio

ns/r

equi

rem

ents

for S

tage

3 w

ill a

lso

appl

y to

this

sta

ge

incl

udin

g th

ose

conc

erni

ng g

ende

r bal

ance

, inc

lusi

on o

f vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

flexi

bilit

y, tr

iang

ulat

ion

and

logi

stic

s (t

imin

g, lo

cati

on, c

ater

ing,

etc

).

•Th

is is

an

impo

rtan

t sta

ge a

s it

sho

uld

reve

al lo

ng te

rm is

sues

aff

ecti

ng th

e co

mm

unit

y, e

spec

ially

clim

ate

chan

ge. T

houg

h ef

fort

s sh

ould

be

mad

e to

un

ders

tand

clim

ate

chan

ge im

pact

s, b

ecau

se o

f dis

cuss

ions

on

disa

ster

s as

w

ell,

less

sco

pe fo

r dis

cuss

ion

on lo

ng te

rm im

pact

s of

clim

ate

chan

ge m

ight

be

ava

ilabl

e. In

this

sta

ge m

ore

focu

sed

atte

ntio

n ca

n be

giv

en.

•In

Sta

ge 4

, som

e of

the

key

issu

es re

gard

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge s

houl

d ha

ve b

een

disc

usse

d. In

this

sta

ge, d

iscu

ss th

em fu

rthe

r to

expl

ore

how

thes

e ch

ange

s ar

e co

ntrib

utin

g to

futu

re u

ncer

tain

ty.

•Th

e di

scus

sion

s in

this

sta

ge w

ill e

labo

rate

on

the

impa

cts

of h

azar

ds a

nd

clim

ate

chan

ge, a

nd h

ighl

ight

the

vario

us s

tran

ds th

at c

ontr

ibut

e to

risk

faci

ng

the

com

mun

ity.

•At

this

sta

ge, t

he s

econ

dary

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in S

tage

2 c

an b

e pa

rtic

ular

ly u

sefu

l. It

will

allo

w c

ross

-che

ckin

g an

d an

alys

ing

cons

iste

ncie

s or

in

cons

iste

ncie

s of

the

com

mun

ity’

s ob

serv

atio

ns a

nd e

xper

ienc

es o

f clim

ate

chan

ge w

ith

scie

ntifi

c da

ta.

•Sp

end

tim

e on

find

ing

out a

ll th

e ch

ange

s af

fect

ing

the

com

mun

ity,

revi

ew th

e se

cond

ary

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in S

tage

2 a

nd a

naly

se w

ith

the

com

mun

ity

wha

t the

act

ual c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts

are,

dis

tinc

t fro

m o

ther

fact

ors

(urb

anis

atio

n, p

opul

atio

n gr

owth

, inf

rast

ruct

ure,

etc

).

•In

clud

e in

vest

igat

ion

of h

ow th

e co

mm

unit

y cu

rren

tly

acce

sses

new

kno

wle

dge

and

reso

urce

s, a

nd w

hat h

as w

orke

d su

cces

sful

ly. F

ocus

spe

cific

ally

on

know

ledg

e re

late

d to

clim

ate

and

haza

rds

data

.

•Th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ion

of e

lder

ly c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs, b

oth

wom

en a

nd m

en, i

s im

port

ant a

t thi

s st

age

to g

et a

n un

ders

tand

ing

of h

isto

rical

pat

tern

s.

•In

som

e ca

ses,

it m

ight

be

nece

ssar

y to

invo

lve

som

e pe

ople

from

out

side

th

e co

mm

unit

y, s

uch

as lo

cal g

over

nmen

t off

icia

ls o

r loc

al N

GOs/

CBOs

, to

get

a go

od u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he k

now

ledg

e ne

twor

ks in

the

area

and

how

the

com

mun

ity

mig

ht b

e ab

le to

acc

ess

them

.

•Fo

r the

sto

ryte

lling

ses

sion

s, e

xplo

re if

this

can

be

done

info

rmal

ly. B

e in

nova

tive

– s

pend

tim

e in

the

com

mun

ity

and

inte

ract

cas

ually

aft

er w

ork

hour

s, in

loca

l tea

hous

es o

r res

taur

ants

, or s

hare

mea

ls, o

r oth

er s

uch

info

rmal

ac

tivi

ties

.

•As

by

this

tim

e si

gnifi

cant

gro

undw

ork

has

alre

ady

been

don

e, th

e an

alys

is a

t th

is s

tage

can

be

focu

sed

and

com

plet

ed w

ithi

n a

few

day

s.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, bot

h th

e fa

cilit

atio

n te

am a

nd th

e co

mm

unit

y pa

rtic

ipan

ts w

ill h

ave

an u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he lo

ng te

rm tr

ends

(inc

ludi

ng

clim

ate

chan

ge) r

elat

ing

to th

e co

mm

unit

y. It

will

als

o id

enti

fy th

e so

urce

s of

sc

ient

ific

and

tech

nica

l inf

orm

atio

n an

d ho

w s

uch

info

rmat

ion

can

be m

erge

d w

ith

com

mun

ity

know

ledg

e fo

r an

adeq

uate

ana

lysi

s of

pos

sibl

e fu

ture

impa

cts

on th

e co

mm

unit

y.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Anal

ysis

of f

utur

e un

cert

aint

yTo

und

erst

and

sign

ifica

nt c

hang

es

over

tim

e th

at a

re

cont

ribut

ing

to

peop

le’s

vul

nera

bilit

y,

and

how

they

cou

ld

build

resi

lienc

e an

d ad

apti

ve c

apac

ity.

Taki

ng in

to a

ccou

nt in

form

atio

n al

read

y ga

ther

ed, f

urth

er e

xplo

re fu

ture

un

cert

aint

y an

d po

ssib

le im

pact

s on

the

com

mun

ity.

Iden

tify

:

•lo

ng te

rms

tren

ds in

clud

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge a

ffec

ting

the

com

mun

ity.

•ho

w c

hang

es m

ay a

ffec

t wom

en a

nd m

en d

iffer

entl

y.

•ho

w p

eopl

e un

ders

tand

the

caus

es o

f the

se tr

ends

or c

hang

es.

•ho

w p

eopl

e ac

cess

(or d

on’t)

rele

vant

and

tim

ely

info

rmat

ion

to h

elp

them

re

duce

risk

or a

dapt

.

•ho

w p

eopl

e ar

e ad

apti

ng to

cha

nge

now

, and

wha

t res

ourc

es th

ey h

ave

for

adap

tati

on.

•w

heth

er th

ey fe

el c

onfid

ent a

bout

thei

r abi

lity

to a

dapt

to fu

ture

cha

nges

.

•Lo

ng T

erm

Tre

nd A

naly

sis

to e

xplo

re h

isto

rical

pat

tern

s of

issu

es th

at a

ffec

t dev

elop

men

t (An

nex

9).

•Kn

owle

dge

Netw

ork

Map

ping

to e

xplo

re d

iffer

ent

sour

ces

of in

form

atio

n re

lati

ng to

clim

ate

chan

ge o

r ot

her t

rend

s (A

nnex

10)

.

•St

oryt

ellin

g an

d di

scus

sion

to a

llow

peo

ple

to s

hare

ex

perie

nces

of h

ow th

eir l

ivel

ihoo

ds h

ave

been

im

pact

ed b

y tr

ends

.

•Re

view

of s

econ

dary

sci

enti

fic in

form

atio

n to

ana

lyse

co

nsis

tenc

ies

or in

cons

iste

ncie

s of

the

com

mun

ity’

s ob

serv

atio

ns a

nd th

ereb

y sy

nthe

sisi

ng th

e tw

o st

rand

s.

Page 24: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 21

Sta

ge

7 —

Go

ver

na

nce

an

aly

sis

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•M

uch

of th

e in

stru

ctio

ns/r

equi

rem

ents

for S

tage

3 w

ill a

lso

appl

y to

this

sta

ge

incl

udin

g th

ose

conc

erni

ng g

ende

r bal

ance

, inc

lusi

on o

f vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

flexi

bilit

y, tr

iang

ulat

ion

and

logi

stic

s (t

imin

g, lo

cati

on, c

ater

ing,

etc

).

•Th

e im

port

ance

of t

his

stag

e lie

s in

the

poss

ibili

ty o

f ach

ievi

ng c

larit

y on

the

conn

ecti

ons

of th

e co

mm

unit

y w

ith

gove

rnan

ce s

truc

ture

s, in

ord

er th

at ri

ghts

an

d en

titl

emen

ts a

re u

nder

stoo

d an

d ch

anne

ls fo

r adv

ocac

y id

enti

fied.

•Di

scus

sion

s on

gov

erna

nce

can

som

etim

es b

e se

nsit

ive

depe

ndin

g on

the

polit

ical

sit

uati

on in

the

coun

try.

The

com

mun

ity

can

also

be

divi

ded

alon

g po

litic

al li

nes.

Loc

al g

over

nmen

t rep

rese

ntat

ives

may

wan

t to

part

icip

ate

in

or o

bser

ve th

e PC

VA. T

his

stag

e re

quire

s a

care

ful a

sses

smen

t of t

he lo

cal

situ

atio

n an

d in

terp

reti

ng th

e an

alys

is a

ccor

ding

ly.

•Lo

cal g

over

nmen

t off

icia

ls c

an o

ften

be

usef

ul k

ey in

form

ants

for t

his

stag

e.

Som

etim

es a

ppro

val b

y lo

cal a

utho

ritie

s fo

r con

duct

ing

the

PCVA

mig

ht b

e re

quire

d; in

volv

ing

them

in s

ome

sess

ions

, or a

s ke

y in

form

ants

, can

ens

ure

thei

r coo

pera

tion

and

sup

port

.

•Si

mila

rly, l

ocal

NGO

s/CB

Os m

ight

be

acti

ve in

the

area

and

hav

e st

rong

co

nnec

tion

s w

ith

the

com

mun

ity.

Som

e of

them

mig

ht b

e in

volv

ed in

adv

ocac

y fo

r the

com

mun

ity.

See

k to

gai

n th

eir i

nput

s as

key

info

rman

ts a

nd in

som

e se

ssio

ns in

this

sta

ge.

•Go

vern

ance

sho

uld

cons

ider

bot

h go

vern

men

t and

trad

itio

nal/

loca

l lea

ders

hip

and

pow

er s

truc

ture

s. C

onsi

der b

oth

fem

ale

and

mal

e st

ruct

ures

. Ana

lyse

loca

l pa

tron

age

links

and

pow

er n

etw

orks

.

•Un

ders

tand

the

lega

l obl

igat

ions

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

of d

iffer

ent g

over

nanc

e st

ruct

ures

and

wha

t the

com

mun

ity

is e

ntit

led

to a

nd w

hat i

ts ri

ghts

are

. The

se

cond

ary

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

in S

tage

2, p

arti

cula

rly re

gard

ing

nati

onal

po

licie

s on

DRR

/CCA

and

pov

erty

, can

be

utili

sed

to e

nabl

e th

e co

mm

unit

y to

an

alys

e th

eir r

ight

s an

d en

titl

emen

ts.

•Se

ek th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ion

of lo

cal t

rade

rs fo

r the

mar

ket m

appi

ng s

essi

ons.

•M

arke

t map

ping

mig

ht n

ot b

e ap

plic

able

to a

ll co

ntex

ts. I

n a

com

mun

ity

whe

re

trad

ing

or fa

rmin

g is

of l

ess

sign

ifica

nce

this

tool

is n

ot re

leva

nt.

•Sp

end

up to

a d

ay o

n th

is s

tage

.

•Af

ter c

ompl

etin

g th

is s

tage

, all

part

icip

ants

sho

uld

have

an

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

com

mun

ity’

s lin

kage

s w

ith

diff

eren

t ext

erna

l and

inte

rnal

gov

erna

nce

and

inst

itut

iona

l str

uctu

res,

incl

udin

g m

arke

ts, a

nd h

ow s

uch

linka

ges

can

cont

ribut

e to

DRR

and

CCA

.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Gove

rnan

ce a

naly

sis

To u

nder

stan

d th

e ro

les

play

ed

by d

iffer

ent

orga

nisa

tion

s bo

th

wit

hin

and

outs

ide

the

com

mun

ity,

how

ac

cess

ible

they

ar

e, a

nd h

ow th

ey

are

cont

ribut

ing

to

impr

ovem

ents

in th

e co

mm

unit

y.

Usin

g th

e in

form

atio

n ga

ther

ed a

nd is

sues

rais

ed in

pre

viou

s st

ages

(esp

ecia

lly S

tage

s 2

and

3) id

enti

fy:

•w

hat a

genc

ies,

org

anis

atio

ns, c

omm

unit

y or

gov

erna

nce

stru

ctur

es e

xist

wit

hin

the

area

and

how

do

com

mun

itie

s in

tera

ct w

ith

them

?

•w

hat g

over

nanc

e st

ruct

ures

(and

pol

icie

s) h

ave

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

for s

uppo

rtin

g co

mm

unit

ies

in D

RR, C

CA o

r liv

elih

oods

(or o

ther

rele

vant

sec

tors

)?

•w

hich

org

anis

atio

ns, p

olic

ies

and

proc

esse

s ar

e co

ntrib

utin

g to

the

occu

rren

ce o

f ha

zard

s, e

xpos

ure

to h

azar

ds, l

ivel

ihoo

d vu

lner

abili

ty, o

r fut

ure

unce

rtai

nty?

•w

hich

org

anis

atio

ns, p

olic

ies

or p

roce

sses

cou

ld (o

r hav

e) s

tren

gthe

n liv

elih

oods

se

curit

y an

d di

vers

ifica

tion

, sup

port

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

effo

rts

and/

or a

dapt

ive

capa

city

? Ho

w?

•w

hat c

onst

rain

ts a

nd o

ppor

tuni

ties

exi

st fo

r im

prov

ing

the

gove

rnan

ce s

itua

tion

?

•w

hat a

re th

e ef

fect

ive

chan

nels

for a

dvoc

acy

and

lobb

ying

for s

uppo

rt to

DRR

and

CCA

? W

hat h

as w

orke

d in

the

past

and

wha

t cou

ld b

e st

reng

then

ed?

•Pr

oble

m T

ree

to id

enti

fy p

olic

y an

d in

stit

utio

nal b

lock

ages

that

may

und

erlin

e a

part

icul

ar p

robl

em (A

nnex

11)

.

•In

stit

utio

nal M

appi

ng to

map

diff

eren

t in

stit

utio

nal s

ervi

ce p

rovi

ders

(Ann

ex 1

0;

Anne

x 3)

.

•M

arke

t Map

ping

to id

enti

fy d

iffer

ent m

arke

t ch

ain

acto

rs to

iden

tify

bot

tlen

ecks

and

op

port

unit

ies

(Ann

ex 1

2).

•In

terv

iew

s w

ith

key

info

rman

ts to

pro

vide

fu

rthe

r ins

ight

into

inst

itut

iona

l lim

itat

ions

an

d op

port

unit

ies.

Can

be

com

bine

d w

ith

inte

rvie

ws

of S

tage

s 4

and

5, if

con

veni

ent.

Page 25: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 22

Sta

ge

8 —

Pr

ior

itis

atio

n a

nd

act

ion

pla

n

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•M

uch

of th

e in

stru

ctio

ns/r

equi

rem

ents

for S

tage

3 w

ill a

lso

appl

y to

this

sta

ge

incl

udin

g th

ose

conc

erni

ng g

ende

r bal

ance

, inc

lusi

on o

f vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

flexi

bilit

y, tr

iang

ulat

ion

and

logi

stic

s (t

imin

g, lo

cati

on, c

ater

ing,

etc

).

•Th

is is

a c

oncl

usiv

e st

age

of th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss, w

here

the

info

rmat

ion

from

pr

evio

us s

tage

s ar

e sy

nthe

sise

d w

ith

the

obje

ctiv

e of

dev

elop

ing

com

mun

ity

acti

on p

lans

. The

PCV

A is

not

a s

tand

alon

e pr

oces

s, b

ut p

art o

f a s

eque

nce

of

acti

viti

es th

at a

re e

vent

ually

tran

slat

ed in

to a

ctio

n. T

his

stag

e is

impo

rtan

t for

un

ders

tand

ing

how

the

wor

k do

ne s

o fa

r can

lead

to c

oncr

ete

acti

ons.

•Be

fore

beg

inni

ng th

is s

tage

it w

ill b

e ne

cess

ary

to re

view

wha

t has

bee

n do

ne,

feed

ing

back

info

rmat

ion

gath

ered

and

ana

lyse

d to

the

com

mun

ity

to e

nsur

e al

l par

tici

pant

s ar

e aw

are

of, a

nd u

nder

stan

d, it

s im

plic

atio

ns. T

riang

ulat

e th

is

revi

ew w

ith

diff

eren

t com

mun

ity

grou

ps, s

o th

at g

aps

in u

nder

stan

ding

can

be

iden

tifie

d an

d ad

dres

sed.

Thi

s w

ill p

rom

ote

agre

emen

t on

the

accu

racy

and

us

eful

ness

of t

he in

form

atio

n be

fore

init

iati

ng th

e ac

tion

pla

nnin

g.

•Di

ffer

ent m

embe

rs w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y m

ay h

ave

diff

eren

t prio

ritie

s, a

nd

haza

rds

may

aff

ect t

hem

diff

eren

tly.

The

refo

re H

azar

d Ra

nkin

g ca

n be

a

sens

itiv

e ex

erci

se. U

se tr

iang

ulat

ion

as a

way

of u

nder

stan

ding

the

diff

eren

ces

and

then

dev

elop

pla

ns th

at m

ost c

omm

unit

y m

embe

rs a

gree

wou

ld b

enef

it th

e co

mm

unit

y as

a w

hole

.

•Ke

y el

emen

t to

disc

uss

at th

is s

tage

is w

ho w

ill ta

ke o

wne

rshi

p of

the

acti

on

plan

and

be

acco

unta

ble

for i

mpl

emen

ting

it. T

he n

eed

to a

rtic

ulat

e w

ho fr

om

the

com

mun

ity

will

be

invo

lved

in im

plem

enti

ng th

e ac

tion

pla

n (a

nd w

hat

role

the

orga

nisa

tion

faci

litat

ing

the

PCVA

will

hav

e in

the

acti

on p

lan)

is a

lso

requ

ired.

•Ne

ed to

ens

ure

that

toge

ther

wit

h pa

st h

azar

ds a

nd c

urre

nt ri

sks,

futu

re

anti

cipa

ted

slow

ons

et c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts

are

also

add

ress

ed in

the

acti

on p

lans

.

•As

this

is a

cru

cial

pla

nnin

g st

age

and

vario

us p

riorit

ies

and

agen

das

wit

hin

the

com

mun

ity

wou

ld h

ave

to b

e ta

ken

into

con

side

rati

on, i

t mig

ht re

quire

a lo

t of

disc

ussi

on, t

ime

and

sens

itiv

ity.

Thi

s co

uld

take

sev

eral

day

s.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, the

com

mun

ity

shou

ld h

ave

an im

plem

enta

ble

com

mun

ity

acti

on p

lan

wit

h cl

early

out

lined

role

s w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y an

d of

th

e or

gani

sati

on.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Prio

ritis

atio

n an

d ac

tion

pla

nTo

prio

ritis

e is

sues

id

enti

fied

for

incl

usio

n in

act

ion

plan

.

Usin

g th

e in

form

atio

n ga

ther

ed in

the

prev

ious

sta

ges

iden

tify

:

•w

hich

haz

ards

and

str

esse

s pr

esen

t the

hig

hest

risk

to th

e co

mm

unit

y? T

his

shou

ld

incl

ude

diff

eren

t gro

ups

wit

hin

the

com

mun

ity

(wom

en, y

oung

peo

ple,

peo

ple

wit

h di

sabi

litie

s, e

lder

ly e

tc)

•w

hich

haz

ards

and

str

esse

s th

e co

mm

unit

y w

ould

like

to a

ddre

ss (p

rese

nt a

nd fu

ture

) as

a re

sult

?

•ho

w th

e co

mm

unit

y w

ould

like

to a

ddre

ss p

riorit

ised

haz

ards

and

str

esse

s (p

rese

nt

and

futu

re)?

•ho

w th

ey w

ould

like

to m

anag

e ris

k an

d un

cert

aint

y?

•ho

w th

ey w

ould

like

to a

ddre

ss th

e un

derly

ing

caus

es o

f vul

nera

bilit

y an

d in

crea

se

adap

tive

cap

acit

y?

•Ri

sk Q

uadr

ant t

o de

velo

p a

com

mon

un

ders

tand

ing

of ri

sk a

nd to

com

pare

di

ffer

ent s

ourc

es o

f ris

k (A

nnex

13)

.

•Ra

nkin

g to

iden

tify

key

haz

ards

and

st

ress

es c

omm

unit

y m

embe

r wou

ld li

ke to

ad

dres

s (A

nnex

8).

•Va

lidit

y Qu

adra

nt to

dev

elop

a c

omm

on

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s an

d su

stai

nabi

lity

of d

iffer

ent s

trat

egie

s se

lect

ed (A

nnex

13)

.

•So

luti

on tr

ee a

nd T

ree

Prun

ing

(Ann

ex 1

1) to

id

enti

fy k

ey a

ctio

ns to

be

incl

uded

in a

ctio

n pl

an.

Page 26: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 23

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Unde

rtak

e to

reco

rd th

is in

form

atio

n in

to a

n ac

tion

pla

n:

•Di

rect

act

ions

and

who

is/a

re re

spon

sibl

e.

•In

dire

ct a

ctio

ns a

nd w

ho is

/are

resp

onsi

ble.

•W

hen

acti

ons

will

take

pla

ce.

•W

hat r

esou

rces

they

requ

ire (c

omm

unit

y, o

ther

).

•Co

sts.

Pres

ent d

raft

act

ion

plan

to c

omm

unit

y as

sem

bly

to d

iscu

ss a

nd a

gree

up

on:

•Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f ada

ptat

ion

and

risk

redu

ctio

n co

mm

itte

e (b

alan

ced

mal

e/fe

mal

e re

pres

enta

tion

)

•Br

iefin

gs w

ith

stak

ehol

ders

to ta

ke fo

rwar

d ac

tion

s.

•W

all p

lan,

impa

ct c

hain

or l

og fr

ame

to re

cord

key

in

terv

enti

ons

plan

ned

(Ann

ex 1

4).

Sta

ge

8 —

Pr

ior

itis

atio

n a

nd

act

ion

pla

n c

on

t ..

.

Page 27: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 24

Sta

ge

9 —

Fin

ali

sin

g t

he

PCVA

pr

oce

ss

In

str

uct

ion

s/R

equ

irem

ents

:

•Ne

ed to

be

clea

r wha

t inf

orm

atio

n th

e co

mm

unit

y w

ants

and

if th

ere

is a

ny

addi

tion

al in

form

atio

n th

ey w

ant a

cces

s to

.

•It

is im

port

ant a

t thi

s st

age

to h

ighl

ight

con

tinu

ity

in te

rms

of fo

llow

up

and

poss

ible

sup

port

for i

mpl

emen

ting

the

acti

on p

lans

.

•Ne

ed to

est

ablis

h fo

cal p

erso

ns in

bot

h th

e fa

cilit

atio

n te

am a

nd c

omm

unit

y w

ho w

ill le

ad fu

ture

liai

son

and

follo

w-u

ps.

•Sp

end

a da

y or

two

on th

is w

rap-

up s

tage

, but

bui

ld in

ext

ra ti

me

for f

ollo

w-u

p ac

tivi

ty.

•At

the

com

plet

ion

of th

is s

tage

, the

com

mun

ity

shou

ld k

now

how

to a

ppro

ach

the

orga

nisa

tion

in th

e fu

ture

and

acc

ess

any

furt

her i

nfor

mat

ion

if ne

cess

ary.

•Yo

u m

ay w

ant t

o co

nsid

er a

cel

ebra

tion

/eve

nt to

cel

ebra

te th

e co

mpl

etio

n of

th

e PV

CA a

nd to

sho

wca

se th

e ne

w c

omm

unit

y pl

ans.

Stag

ePu

rpos

eTa

sks

and

Ques

tion

sTo

ols

and

Reso

urce

s

Fina

lisin

g th

e PC

VA

proc

ess

To fi

nalis

e th

e PC

VA

proc

ess

and

set

in p

lace

follo

w-u

p ac

tion

s.

Prio

r to

depa

rtin

g th

e te

am s

houl

d:

•Es

tabl

ish

a lia

ison

gro

up w

ithi

n th

e co

mm

unit

y an

d a

syst

em fo

r com

mun

icat

ion.

•Ag

ree

on a

pro

cess

to c

ompi

le th

e PC

VA o

utpu

ts, p

repa

re a

repo

rt a

nd s

hare

it.

•Ar

rang

e fo

llow

up

mee

ting

(s) w

ith

the

com

mun

ity.

•Co

mpi

le a

repo

rt o

n th

e PC

VA p

roce

ss in

clud

ing

of c

omm

unit

y ac

tion

pla

n to

be

impl

emen

ted.

•Em

ail l

ist,

writ

ten

cont

act g

roup

and

/or

orga

nisa

tion

al c

hart

.

•Re

port

tem

plat

e.

Page 28: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 25

Annex 1: Plate/Circle Diagram or Pie Chart Plate or Circle Diagrams (also called Pie charts) are used for comparisons of a small number of categories (see Fig. 4, right). Using more than five categories can make a Plate Diagram difficult to read. It is very important to label the slices to make the comparison easier. The slices should be also coloured or shaded differently for easier comparison.

Discuss with the participants what the key different groups in the community are. This can be along the lines of gender, age, religion, ethnicity or any other grouping that they think characterises their community.

Explain the Plate Diagram using an illustration and ask participants to draw such a diagram using the categories they suggested. Remember to mention that the proportions do not have to be exact, but can be approximate.

Divide the participants into groups of 4–5 per group, taking care that each group represents a balance in gender, age, etc. Once the Plate Diagrams are completed, have an open discussion and compare them to arrive at a final diagram.

Annex 2: Daily Time ChartA Daily Time Chart (see Fig. 5, below) allows collecting information on the daily activity patterns of community members and to compare the patterns of different

8. AnNexes

Fig. 4: Example of a Plate Diagram showing age groups in a community

groups in the community (women, men, old, employed, unemployed, etc). Based on the Plate Diagram, Daily Time Charts to be prepared for each group identified as important in the community through discussions with each group.

If the participants find it difficult to easily identify general patterns, individual Daily Time Charts should be made and then compiled into a general one for the group.

Do remember that this does not have to be perfect. The aim should be to understand the overall general pattern. Focus on what is important and do not make the diagram too complex. Facilitate the discussion to make the participants concentrate on the general pattern of time allocation to different activities and use of the time.

Fig. 5: Example of a Daily Time Chart of women’s activities in the Gaza Strip (from Theis and Grady 1991)

Page 29: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 26

Fig. 6: Example of a Venn Diagram showing water use/control in Sudan (from Theis and Grady 1991)

Fig. 7: Example of a Resource Map using symbols to show natural and human-made features of an area in Kenya (from Kalibo and Medley 2007)

Fig. 8: Example of a Hazard Map in a village in Ghana (Daze et al 2009)

Annex 3: Venn Diagram A Venn or Circle Diagram (Fig. 6) shows the key institutions in a community and their importance and relationships. Discuss with participants and identify the key institutions in their community and also those that have a relationship with the community. Identify the degree of contact and overlap between the institutions and with the community in terms of decision-making or services delivery.

Follow the basic guide: Separate circles = no contact; Touching circles = information passes between the institutions and/or to the community; Small overlap = some cooperation; Large overlap = significant cooperation. Most important institutions should be drawn as the largest circles and less important ones as smaller circles.

Venn Diagrams might be difficult for those not familiar to them, so draw a simple example. Draw the diagram in pencil first and adjust the size and arrangement until participants are satisfied.

Annex 4: Resource Map/ Hazard Map A Resource Map (Fig. 7, above) is prepared by a community to provide an understanding of which places and resources are used for what purposes in their locality. A simple sketch map with hand-drawn symbols is the most common type, but communities can also be trained to use more sophisticated methods such as the use of a GPS. Do not look for accuracy as such maps typically are not to scale. The Resource Map is mainly used to indicate the spatial layout and accessibility of the community’s natural and physical resources and features, and their inter-relationships.

Similarly, a Hazard Map (Fig. 8, below) of the community can be prepared. First plot the main features of the area such as houses, community buildings, fields, natural features, etc. Once again, exact details are not necessary. For example, not all the houses have to be mapped, only the area where the houses are located, using the symbol for a house. Then identify the hazards and which areas and resources are the most affected.

Page 30: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 27

Fig. 10: Example of a Seasonal Calendar from a village in Sudan showing rainfall, crop patterns and labour demand (from Theis and Grady 1991)

Annex 5: Transect Walk A Transect Walk is a diagram of main land-use zones in an area. It complements a Resource Map by comparing the main features, resources, uses and problems of different zones.

Walk with community participants through their area and surroundings and discuss the characteristics of each zone. After returning from the walk, work with the participants to prepare the transect walk diagram, as shown in below in Fig. 9 (right). Ask participants to use symbols that they are familiar with, as in the Resource Map. A Transect Walk can also be used to complement a Hazard Map.

Annex 6: Seasonal Calendar A Transect Walk is a diagram of main land-use zones in an area. It complements a Resource Map by comparing the main features, resources, uses and problems of different zones.

Walk with community participants through their area and surroundings and discuss the characteristics of each zone. After returning from the walk, work with the participants to prepare the transect walk diagram, as shown in below in Fig. 10 (below). Ask participants to use symbols that they are familiar with, as in the Resource Map. A Transect Walk can also be used to complement a Hazard Map.

Fig. 9: Example of a Transect Walk diagram from a village in Sudan (from Theis and Grady 1991)

Page 31: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 28

Annex 7: Historical Timeline A Historical Timeline (Fig. 11) reveals information for understanding the present situation in a community. It allows insight into past hazards and changes in their nature and intensity, and how they have resulted into the current situation.

Ask the participants to list major events and disasters in chronological order. Events that may have contributed to vulnerability or capacity, such as change in government or major political events, should also be listed. Seek the help of key informants such as elderly members of the community.

Fig. 11: Example of a Historical Timeline prepared in Niger showing events such as famines gradually weakening the community (Daze et al 2009)

Annex 8: Ranking Ranking of wealth or wellbeing can be elaborate when used for poverty alleviation programs. For the PCVA, a simple ranking of different livelihood groups should be done to understand vulnerability.

In consultation with the participants, decide on a few main wealth groups (see Fig. 12 for an example). This can also be based on the findings of the Plate Diagram (Annex 1). Allocate a number to each household in the community and write each number on separate cards. Divide participants into three or more groups and ask each group separately to order the cards into the different wealth groups. Use separate baskets or boxes to sort the cards according to each wealth group.

Compile the findings from the different participant groups into one ranking table. Seek the help of key informants if the ranking between the groups vary too much and also validate by observing the living conditions of the different households. Note the criteria used by the participants for ranking (see Fig. 12).

Fig. 12: Example of a Ranking of well-being in Cambodia (CWS 2010)

Hazard Ranking can be done similarly, listing hazards affecting the community from the most severe hazards to less severe ones.

Annex 9: Long Term Trend Analysis A Long Term Trend Analysis can be done using the findings of the Daily Time Chart (Annex 2), Seasonal Calendar (Annex 6) and Historical Timeline (Annex 7). For the PCVA, this tool is used to understand future uncertainty, particularly climate change, based on past trends.

Participants should be asked to analyse what the root causes of the changes are and how they vary between different wealth/ social groups within the community. Having analysed important historical trends, participants can then be asked what changes they expect to take place over the next 10–15 years or so. Using familiar symbols, the analysis can be compiled into a diagram as a series of pictures showing the nature of change (see Fig. 13 below).

Fig. 13: Example of a Long Term Trend Analysis (CIDT 2001)

Page 32: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 29

Annex 10: Knowledge Network Mapping With participants, list the knowledge sources on climate change and disasters within the community and outside within and external to the community. These can be organisations, social groups, households and/or individuals.

Draw a diagram with these sources represented as circles or some other shape and label them (Fig. 14, above). Place the sources within the community inside an inner circle and the others outside the circle. Use different types of lines to connect the sources (such as dotted, thick, thin, etc) or use different colours to represent strong to weak connections or networks between them. The direction of the arrows can be used to indicate direction of knowledge flow.

Knowledge Network Mapping can also be done using a Venn Diagram (see Annex 3). A technique similar to Knowledge Network Mapping or a Venn Diagram can be used for Institutional Mapping to identify key institutional service providers and connections between them and links to the community.

Annex 11: Problem/Solution Tree & Tree PruningThe Problem Tree shows the relationships between different aspects of a problem. It allows understanding of the root causes of the problem and the consequences. It helps to develop actions to address the root causes of vulnerability, in the case of the PCVA, to disasters and climate change.

Give participants small pieces of paper and ask them to write one major problem relating to disasters and/or climate change. Then group the problems according to similarity. Then draw the Problem Tree – the trunk represents the problems, the roots the causes and the leaves the effects. Identify institutional and policy blockages.

In the same way, a Solution Tree can be produced.

Fig. 14: Example of a Network Map from India showing different types of links between various groups by using different types of lines (Benecke 2011)

Here instead of problems, list the solutions. The trunk represents the solutions; the roots are the actions for implementing the solutions and the leaves the results of the actions.

Tree Pruning can be used to further define the Solution Tree. Remove the leaves and roots that represent problems that would be impossible to address in the short term. Keep the leaves and roots that can be addressed through feasible action plans.

Fig. 15: Example of a Problem Tree to analyse social problems (Community Media undated)

Page 33: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 30

Annex 12: Market MappingMarket Mapping allows small-scale farmers, traders or producers to make action plans to access markets and sell their products. This can reduce economic vulnerability and increase capacity of community members.

As in the Knowledge Network Mapping (Annex 10) first create a diagram of the main actors of the market supply chain of a particular product important in the community and identify their relationships (see Fig. 16, below). At a later session, include as many representatives from these actors as possible and discuss to identify barriers, and ‘win-win’ solutions agreeable to all the actors. Then develop an action plan to overcome the barriers and move the solutions forward.

Annex 13: Risk QuadrantUse information from the Hazard Map (Annex 4) and Hazard Ranking (Annex 8), and also the Historical Timeline (Annex 7). The hazards affecting the community can be displayed in a Risk Quadrant or Matrix to understand risk in terms of impact and probability (Fig. 14).

Draw a four-quadrant matrix as shown in Fig. 17 (right) . Ask the participants to list the hazards that are most likely and can have high impact in the top right box. Hazards that can have high impact, but low likelihood should be listed in the top left box. Less likely and low impact hazards should be listed in the bottom left box. Hazards that are very likely, but having low impact

Fig. 16: Example of Market Mapping for bee products in Nepal (Practical Action 2008)

should be listed in the bottom right box. This allows analysing which hazards pose most risk and hence should be prioritised for action.

A guide to develop risk reduction action plans based on the Risk Quadrant can be as follows: High–High – work actively to prevent these hazards; Low–Low – keep a watch-out; High–Low – reduce likelihood of impact; Low–High – be prepared for this to happen.

Similarly, a Validity Quadrant can be made. Here plot the different ARR action plans or strategies according to effectiveness and sustainability in four boxes. Strategies in the High (effectiveness) – High (sustainability) box should be prioritised, while those in the Low–Low box can be considered for action much later in the future.

Fig. 17: Example of a Risk Quadrant

Page 34: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 31

Annex 14: Wall Plan/ Impact Chain/ Log FrameThere are various project management tools and the action plan developed through the PCVA process will have to utilise such a tool to monitor progress and measure its impact.

A simple Wall Plan involves listing the action plan or project timeline on a series of large sheets of paper fixed to the wall of the project office or the place in the community from where the project is being managed. It should indicate regular milestones for reviewing progress and developing actions to keep progress on track. An Impact Chain is another such tool. It answers a key question, “What do we want to achieve?” according to resources, activities, output, usage/target group and impact.

The Log Frame (Fig. 15) is a more sophisticated tool, and although it can be effective, it requires substantial training to understand and use it. The Log Frame should be used right from the beginning of project design. It allows defining what the project will do, and produce, its objectives and assumptions, and how the project’s impact will be measured, monitored and evaluated.

Fig. 18: Example of a Log Frame matrix (AusAID 2005)

Page 35: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

Page 32

Resources and Further Information

• CIDT (2001) Participatory Learning and Action Training Course. Walsall (UK), Centre for International Development and Training (CIDT).

• Daze, A., Ambrose, K. and Ehrhart (2009) Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis Handbook. Canberra, CARE. http://www.careclimatechange.org/tk/integration/en/quick_links/tools/climate_vulnerability.html

• Regmi, B.R. et al (2010) Participatory Tools and Techniques for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Exploring Adaptation Options: A Community Based Tool Kit for Practitioners. London, DFID (Department for International development) and Kathmandu, LFP (Livelihoods and Forestry Programme). http://www.forestrynepal.org/publications/reports/4667

• IFRC (2008) What is VCA? An Introduction to Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment and VCA Toolbox. Geneva, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/vca/vca-toolbox-en.pdf

• Oxfam GB (2010) Oxfam Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide. Oxford, Oxfam.

• Theis, J. and Grady. H.M. (1991) Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development. London, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). http://pubs.iied.org/8282IIED.html

• Turvill, E. and Dios, H.B.D. (2009) Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis Training Pack. Oxford, Oxfam. http://disastermanagementbangladesh.org/oxfam_tools/index.php

9. Key Resources and References

References in Annexes

• AusAID (2005) AusGuideline:The Logical Framework Approach. Canberra, AusAID.

• Kalibo, H.W. and Medley, K.E. (2007) “Participatory Resource Mapping for Adaptive Collaborative Management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya”. Landscape and Urban Planning, no. 82.

• CWS (Church World Service) (2010) Participatory Rural Appraisal and Wealth Ranking (presentation). Phnom Penh, Act Alliance.

• Benecke, E. (2011) “Networking for Climate Change: Agency in the Context of Renewable Energy Governance in India”. International Environmental Agreements, vol. 11, no. 1.

• Practical Action (2008) Learning from Practice: Lessons on Facilitating Participatory Market Mapping Workshops. Rugby (UK), Practical Action.

• CIDT (2001) Participatory Learning and Action Training Course. Walsall (UK), CIDT (Centre for International Development and Training).

• Community Media (undated) Participatory Learning Manual. Dublin, Community Media.

Page 36: Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis (PCVA) Toolkit

132 Leicester Street Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: +61 3 9289 9444 Fax: +61 3 9347 1983 www.oxfam.org.au

Oxfam Australia is working for a future free from poverty. Oxfam Australia is a Public Benevolent Institution. ABN 18 055 208 636.