CA/ANE/WG/7 – C/CAR/WG/9 – DP/06

GULF RNAV ROUTES AD HOC MEETING6-7 MARCH 2012

Participants:p• FAA • SENEAMSENEAM• DGAC Mexico• IATAIATA

Federal AviationAdministration

1

Order of Discussion

• Conducted Project OverviewUpdated Ro te Operating Polic Doc ment• Updated Route Operating Policy Document

• Discussed traffic routing on draft RNAV RoutesDi l d RNAV Vid– Displayed RNAV Video

– Reviewed SENEAM Routing Notes• Discussed Route Re Design Options/Concerns• Discussed Route Re-Design Options/Concerns

Federal AviationAdministration

2

Order of Discussion• Discussed draft Route Benefits Analysis

FAA Technical Center comparison of route lengths– FAA Technical Center comparison of route lengths and fuel burn on existing vs new RNAV routes

• Reviewed Route/Waypoint Publication ypSchedule for the FAA and SENEAM

• Discussed routing during transition period using g g p gstand-alone waypoints

• Discussed Transition Sequence of Events Plan

Federal AviationAdministration

3

Order of Discussion

Other issues addressed:• Air Traffic Service Provider (ATSP) Letters of

Agreement• Sharing of Controller Training information• CAR/SAM Air Navigation Plan revisiong

– Updated draft list of waypoints to be added & delete• Route and waypoint naming update

Federal AviationAdministration

4

Current GOMEX ATS Routes with Approximate Radar Coverage

Federal AviationAdministration

5

GOMEX RNAV Routes – as of 23 Feb 2012

Federal AviationAdministration

6

Route Proposal 1CRoute Proposal 1C--2B2B--4A4A--5B5B--6B6B

Option 2 March 6

Federal AviationAdministration

7

Agreed Follow Up Actions

• Continue to communicate between FAA, SENEAM, DGAC Mexico and IATA users

• Quality check and finalize FAA Technical Center Route Analysis

• Analyze potential enhancements provided by Option 2 route design

Federal AviationAdministration

8

Follow Up Actions

• Note: significant changes to the 23 February g g yroute design would make it unlikely to be able to complete necessary tasks to implement in Sept 2012

• In approximately 10 days, conduct a telcon to finalize the decision to pursue implementation in Sept 2012 or to pursue January 2013 implementation of a route design incorporatingimplementation of a route design incorporating Option 2 modifications

Federal AviationAdministration

9