Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)

43
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?) Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan INT Program 2010; LBL ..

description

Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?). INT Program 2010; LBL. Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University. Purpose of this discussion. To complete n Standard Model (SM + n mass + lepton mixing) measurement of CP phase (KM type) d and q 13 is necessary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)

Page 1: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)

Hisakazu Minakata

Tokyo Metropolitan University

INT Program 2010; LBL ..

Page 2: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Purpose of this discussion

• To complete Standard Model (SM + mass + lepton mixing) measurement of CP phase (KM type) and13is necessary

• It seems that is not so easy to determine them, in particular

• If any theoretical issues involved we shall try to remove them

• One of them is P degeneracy

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 3: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P degeneracy

• P degeneracy is the fact that measurement of oscillation probability P and -bar oscillation probability bar-P at an energy (which would determine 13 and actually do NOT lead to a unique solution of 13 and

• Experts may say that they know everything

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Is this true? To what extent?

Page 4: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

An example; Intrinsic degeneracy

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

P degeneracy is simplest to see by bi-P plot (HM-H.Nunokawa 01)

Page 5: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Is P degeneracy necessarily two-fold?

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Intrinsic degeneracy; S. Uchinami for PhD thesis

But, the answer is NO !People suspect

the answer is YES because

Page 6: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

ParameterDegeneracy;

definition

Page 7: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P degeneracy

• Let us assume that all the mixing parameters besides 13 and are known

• measurement of oscillation probability Pe and bar- oscillation probability bar-Pe at an energy E (which would determine 13 and do NOT lead to unique solution of 13 and

• Easy to solve mathematically: measurement at E=E1 and E2 (or adding more channel) solves the degeneracyJuly 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Intrinsic degeneracy (Burguet-C. et al. 01)

Page 8: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P degeneracy (continued)

• the mixing parameters besides 13 and are not known so precisely

• Mass hierarchy is not known, and may not be known either at the time of measurement of CP phase

• More solutions of 13 and

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Sign m231

degeneracy (HM-Nunokawa 01)

23 octant degeneracy (Fogli-Lisi 96)

Page 9: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

P degeneracy is doubled by unknown mass hierarchy

• You can draw two ellipses from a point in P-Pbar space

• Intrinsic degeneracy

• Doubled by the unknown sign of m2

• 4-fold degeneracy

Page 10: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

A well-defined

framework for P

degeneracy

Page 11: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

I use Cervera et al. formula for oscillation probabilities

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

You can show 2x2x2=8

Page 12: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P degeneracy; Generalized version

• Similar degeneracy occurs in, in addition to (P, PCP),

• T-conjugate (P=Pe, PT=Pe)

• CPT-conjugate (P, PCPT)

• Golden-silver (PT, PS) channels

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Generally, P degeneracy has simpler structure

Page 13: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

P-degenerac

y as an invariance

of P

Page 14: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P-dege. from symmetry of the probability

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

are invariant under transf.

PT and PS are also invariant under the same transformation

(1) P degeneracy obvious (2) Form of the degeneracy solutions are determined by the symmetry

Page 15: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

How to obtain

degeneracy solutions?

Page 16: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

An example; intrinsic degeneracy

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 17: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

An example; intrinsic degeneracy2

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

4th-order eq. of s13!

Page 18: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

P degeneracy as a re-parametrization invariance

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Degeneracy solutions form network!

Page 19: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Degeneracy

solutions; how they look like?

Page 20: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

13

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

II

III

V

Page 21: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 22: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

I focus energy dependence; 13

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 23: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

I focus energy dependence;

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 24: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

How to solve P

degeneracy?

Page 25: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Varying E at long enough baseline

• Vacuum effect comes in with L/E• Matter effect comes in with aL• Varying E implies to change relative importance

between vacuum and matter effects (varying L not)• powerful for mass hierarchy

a=sqrt{2}GFNea=sqrt{2}GFNe

atmosphericatmospheric

solarsolar

the best way for everything if perfect event reconstruction with 2-3 oscillation periods spanned

the best way for everything if perfect event reconstruction with 2-3 oscillation periods spanned

Page 26: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Project X: Off-axis NOVA --> VLBL multi-OM type approachProject X: Off-axis NOVA --> VLBL multi-OM type approach

Page 27: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Practical issues in VLBL approach• In water background at low

energies for high energy beam highly nontrivial -> see next page

• How reliable is the event reconstruction & background rejection algorithm ?

• Energy resolution • Alternative way; ~100 kt scale

Liquid Ar detector => feasible when?

Page 28: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Background at low E for HE beam

Fanny Dufour@3rd T2KK WSFanny Dufour@3rd T2KK WS

Page 29: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Varying L

• Matter effect comes in with (aL/2) = ~0.27 and relatively small even at L ~ 1000 km

• By varying L, the trigonometric nature of the oscillations manifests itself (spectrum analysis helps)

• Good for CPV search (w. spectrum analysis)

If a=sqrt{2}GFNe is small If a=sqrt{2}GFNe is small

Page 30: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Two detector

method is powerful

Page 31: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Kamioka-Korea 2 detector setting

Why don’t you bring one of the 2 tanks to Korea? (@EPP2010)

Why don’t you bring one of the 2 tanks to Korea? (@EPP2010)

Page 32: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Original idea: sensitive because dynamism in 2nd oscillation maximum

Page 33: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Spectral information solves intrinsic degeneracy

from 1000 page Ishitsuka file

from 1000 page Ishitsuka file

SK momentum resolution ~30 MeV at 1 GeVSK momentum resolution ~30 MeV at 1 GeV

T2KT2K T2KKT2KK

2 detector method powerful!2 detector method powerful!

Ishitsuka-Kajita-HM-Nunokawa 05

Page 34: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Two-detector setting is powerful

• With the same input parameter and Korean detector of 0.54 Mt the sign-m2 degeneracy is NOT completely resolved

T2KKT2KK Korea onlyKorea only

Page 35: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

T2KK vs. T2K II Comparison T2KK vs. T2K II Comparison Total mass of the detectors = 0.54 Mton fid. mass4 years neutrino beam + 4 years anti-neutrino beam

Total mass of the detectors = 0.54 Mton fid. mass4 years neutrino beam + 4 years anti-neutrino beam

3 (thick)3 (thick) 2 (thin)2 (thin)

Mass hierarchyMass hierarchy CP violation (sin≠0)CP violation (sin≠0)

hep-ph/0504026

T2K

T2KK

Page 36: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Relative cross section error does matter

• Identical 2 detector setting robust to larger systematic error • It gives conservative lower bounds on sensitivity estimate

of mass hierarchy and CP

Barger et al. 07

Barger et al. 07

T2K IIT2K II

T2KKT2KK

Page 37: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

T2KK can solve 23 degeneracy in situ

T2K-II + phase II reactorT2KK=0 assumed

sin

2 2

13

sin2 23

sin

2 2

13

> 32~3

T2KK 2(rough)

T2KK has better sensitivityat sin2 213 < 0.06~0.07 .

hep-ph/0601258

Page 38: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Conclusion

• Global overview of P degeneracy is given

• In some cases, P degeneracy can be understood by the symmetry argument

• More generically it is an invariance under discrete mapping of mixing parameters whose explicit form should be obtained by solving equations

• Sign-m2 and 23 octant degeneracies are robust against spectrum analysis

• Some ideas are discussed on how to solve P degeneracy

Page 39: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Another example; sign-m2 degeneracy

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 40: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Another example; sign-m2 degeneracy2

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 41: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

Another example; sign-m2 degeneracy3

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Page 42: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Neutrino factory

Page 43: Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations  (and how to solve it?)

July 27, 2010 INT Program LBL

Nufact